knowledge orchestration for sustained competitive advantage

Upload: max-erik-rohde

Post on 08-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    1/15

    Knowledge Orchestration for

    Sustained Competitive Advantage

    44th Hawaiian Conference on System Sciences

    Koloa, Kaui, Hawaii, January 4-7 2011

    Department of Information Systems and

    Operations Management

    Max Rohde and David Sundaram

    [email protected] [email protected]

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    2/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 2

    Motivation

    Do we really know what we are talking about when we are

    talking about knowledge?

    How do I design, implement and evaluate a system, which is goodat supporting work

    with knowledge and unstructured information?

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    3/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 3

    How we use the word knowledge?

    Knowledge Management

    Knowledge SharingKnowledge Repository

    Knowledge Storage, Retrieval, Application and Creation

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    4/15

    3/1/2011

    The knowledge language trap.

    More knowledge is better.

    Organizations can possess and store knowledge.

    Knowledge is maybe the most valuable organizational resource.

    We can manage knowledge.

    (Kogut & Zander, 1992; Grant, 1996)

    BUT: Knowledge is not a thing. What is the value of knowledge?

    What is the value of knowledge?

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    5/15

    3/1/2011

    Knowing as alternative for knowledge?

    Knowing emphasizes the behavioural dimension of knowledge.

    Knowing is bound to actions and individuals.

    (Orlikowski, 2002; Thompson & Walsham, 2004)

    BUT: Knowledge related capability is sticky. Organizations cannot know.

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    6/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 6

    Theoretical Perspectives

    (Cook & Brown, 1998)

    (Orlikowski, 2002)(Kogut & Zander, 1992; Grant, 1996)

    Epistemology of Possession Epistem

    Collective knowing driven by

    individuals

    Strategic capabilities of

    organizations

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    7/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 7

    IssuesEpistemology

    Value

    Aggregation

    Possession or Practice

    Resource or Action

    Organization or Individual

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    8/15

    3/1/2011 8

    Value

    The structures, which make up knowledge (formal routines,

    technologies, human resources, )

    only potentially enable action leading to competitive advantage

    or lead to unmindful action and competitive disadvantage.

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    9/15

    9

    A Definition

    A knowledge potential describes an organizational

    capability, which might or might not be enacted. The value

    of this capability depends on whether it will (1) enable the

    organization to take mindful actions, (2) to innovate,

    and/or (3) to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

    (formal routines,

    technologies, human

    resources, )

    (Blackler, 1995)

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    10/15

    3/1/2011

    A Comparison with Organizational Routines

    Possession

    Ostensive

    (Feldman & Pentland, 2003

    Formalized best practice,

    technologies, organizational

    structures

    Every routine is executed

    differently depending on a

    changing environment.

    Epistemology

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    11/15

    3/1/2011

    The mindful execution of routines requires both

    sufficient structural stability

    and

    situational flexibility.

    (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2006; Levinthal & Rerup,

    applying this lens to knowledge

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    12/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 12

    Alignment between Structural

    and Situational Dimension

    Bridging the ostensive and performative is a way to enable context-informed

    organizational decisions, flexibility, and learning (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2006; Levinthal &

    Rerup, 2006)

    Kno

    wledge

    Potentials

    Environment

    Kn

    owing

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    13/15

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    14/15

    3/1/2011 HICSS 11 14

    Some Implications of this Model

    The value of the knowledge related capability (knowledge potential)heavily depends on the environment.

    Aligning knowledge potentials with a changing environment is facilitatedby the process of knowing, which in turn is enrooted in the actions of

    individuals.

    The focus lies therewith not on managing knowledge potentials butrather on their alignment with a constantly changing environment.

  • 8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

    15/15

    3/1/2011 Max Rohde and David Sundaram 15

    Questions?

    Special thanks to the reviewers and editors of HICSS-44. We gratefully

    acknowledge the support by the University of Auckland Council, theUniversity of Auckland Business School, the Faculty Research and

    Development Fund (UoA) and the Department of Information Systems

    and Operations Management (UoA).

    Thank You for Your Attention!