knowledge orchestration for sustained competitive advantage
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
1/15
Knowledge Orchestration for
Sustained Competitive Advantage
44th Hawaiian Conference on System Sciences
Koloa, Kaui, Hawaii, January 4-7 2011
Department of Information Systems and
Operations Management
Max Rohde and David Sundaram
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
2/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 2
Motivation
Do we really know what we are talking about when we are
talking about knowledge?
How do I design, implement and evaluate a system, which is goodat supporting work
with knowledge and unstructured information?
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
3/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 3
How we use the word knowledge?
Knowledge Management
Knowledge SharingKnowledge Repository
Knowledge Storage, Retrieval, Application and Creation
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
4/15
3/1/2011
The knowledge language trap.
More knowledge is better.
Organizations can possess and store knowledge.
Knowledge is maybe the most valuable organizational resource.
We can manage knowledge.
(Kogut & Zander, 1992; Grant, 1996)
BUT: Knowledge is not a thing. What is the value of knowledge?
What is the value of knowledge?
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
5/15
3/1/2011
Knowing as alternative for knowledge?
Knowing emphasizes the behavioural dimension of knowledge.
Knowing is bound to actions and individuals.
(Orlikowski, 2002; Thompson & Walsham, 2004)
BUT: Knowledge related capability is sticky. Organizations cannot know.
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
6/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 6
Theoretical Perspectives
(Cook & Brown, 1998)
(Orlikowski, 2002)(Kogut & Zander, 1992; Grant, 1996)
Epistemology of Possession Epistem
Collective knowing driven by
individuals
Strategic capabilities of
organizations
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
7/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 7
IssuesEpistemology
Value
Aggregation
Possession or Practice
Resource or Action
Organization or Individual
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
8/15
3/1/2011 8
Value
The structures, which make up knowledge (formal routines,
technologies, human resources, )
only potentially enable action leading to competitive advantage
or lead to unmindful action and competitive disadvantage.
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
9/15
9
A Definition
A knowledge potential describes an organizational
capability, which might or might not be enacted. The value
of this capability depends on whether it will (1) enable the
organization to take mindful actions, (2) to innovate,
and/or (3) to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.
(formal routines,
technologies, human
resources, )
(Blackler, 1995)
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
10/15
3/1/2011
A Comparison with Organizational Routines
Possession
Ostensive
(Feldman & Pentland, 2003
Formalized best practice,
technologies, organizational
structures
Every routine is executed
differently depending on a
changing environment.
Epistemology
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
11/15
3/1/2011
The mindful execution of routines requires both
sufficient structural stability
and
situational flexibility.
(Weick & Sutcliffe, 2006; Levinthal & Rerup,
applying this lens to knowledge
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
12/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 12
Alignment between Structural
and Situational Dimension
Bridging the ostensive and performative is a way to enable context-informed
organizational decisions, flexibility, and learning (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2006; Levinthal &
Rerup, 2006)
Kno
wledge
Potentials
Environment
Kn
owing
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
13/15
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
14/15
3/1/2011 HICSS 11 14
Some Implications of this Model
The value of the knowledge related capability (knowledge potential)heavily depends on the environment.
Aligning knowledge potentials with a changing environment is facilitatedby the process of knowing, which in turn is enrooted in the actions of
individuals.
The focus lies therewith not on managing knowledge potentials butrather on their alignment with a constantly changing environment.
-
8/7/2019 Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage
15/15
3/1/2011 Max Rohde and David Sundaram 15
Questions?
Special thanks to the reviewers and editors of HICSS-44. We gratefully
acknowledge the support by the University of Auckland Council, theUniversity of Auckland Business School, the Faculty Research and
Development Fund (UoA) and the Department of Information Systems
and Operations Management (UoA).
Thank You for Your Attention!