kinetic and equilibrium studies of the adsorption of cd...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 3
Kinetic and equilibrium studies of the adsorption of Cd (II) from aqueous
solutions by wood apple shell activated carbon
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
113
3.1 INTRODUCTION
With the rapid increase in population and growth of industrialization
worldwide, quality of both surface and ground water is deteriorating day by day.
Industrial uses of metals and other processes have introduced substantial amounts
of potentially toxic heavy metals into the environment [1]. Modern societies use
many goods and amenities involving an increasing range of metallic products.
High consumptions, frequent disposal and replacement of disposable items are
generating diverse types of metallic wastes. These wastes are invariably
discharged into the environment and thus are poisoning the biosphere [2]. Heavy
metals are toxic to aquatic flora, animals and human beings, even at relatively low
concentrations. Some of them (such as, cadmium, mercury, chromium, etc.) are
capable of being assimilated, stored and concentrated by organisms. Cadmium is
introduced into water from smelting, metal plating, cadmium nickel batteries,
phosphate fertilizers, mining, paint, pigments, plastics, stabilizers, alloy industries,
mining, ceramics and sewage sludge etc [3 - 5].
Cadmium is present in air in the form of particles in which cadmium oxide
is probably an important constituent. Cigarette smoking increases cadmium
concentrations inside houses. The average daily exposure from cigarette smoking
(20 cigarettes a day) is 2 to 4 μg of cadmium. Cadmium concentrations in
unpolluted natural waters are usually below 1 μg/dm3. Contamination of drinking-
water may occur as a result of the presence of cadmium as an impurity in the zinc
of galvanized pipes or cadmium-containing solders in fittings, water heaters, water
coolers and taps. Food is the main source of cadmium intake for non-
occupationally exposed people. Crops grown in polluted soil or irrigated with
polluted water may contain increased concentration of Cd(II). Animal kidneys and
livers concentrate cadmium. Levels of Cd(II) concentrations in fruit, meat and
vegetables are usually below 10 μg/kg, in liver 10–100 μg/kg and in kidney 100 –
1000 μg/kg. Cadmium concentrations in tissues increase with age. Both kidney
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
114
and liver act as cadmium stores; 50–85% of the body burden is stored in kidney
and liver, 30–60% being stored in the kidney alone [6].
The biological half-life of cadmium in humans is in the range of 10 – 35
years. With chronic oral exposure, kidney appears to be the most sensitive organ.
Cadmium affects the resorption function of the proximal tubules, the first
symptom being an increase in the urinary excretion of low-molecular-weight
proteins, known as tubular proteinuria. The results of studies of chromosomal
aberrations in the peripheral lymphocytes of patients with itai-itai disease exposed
chronically to cadmium via the diet were contradictory. There is some evidence
that cadmium is carcinogenic by the inhalation route, and IARC (1987) has
classified cadmium and cadmium compounds in group 2A. On the assumption of
an absorption rate for dietary cadmium of 5% and a daily excretion rate of 0.005%
of body burden, JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives)
remarked that, if levels of cadmium in the renal cortex are not to exceed 50 mg/kg,
the total intake of cadmium should not exceed 1 μg/kg of body weight per day [6].
The metals cannot be degraded further to non-toxic products or recovered
economically from such a contaminated environment. There are several methods
developed to remove Cd(II) such as ion exchange [7], coagulation [8], flotation
[9], co-precipitation [10], solvent extraction [11], membrane technology [12, 13],
adsorption etc. With increasing environmental awareness and legal constraints
being imposed on discharge of effluents, a need for cost effective alternative
technologies are essential. So amongst all, adsorption process is a promising
technique for the removal of heavy metal ions from waste water, because of its
wide range of target pollutants, high adsorption capacity, possibly selective
adsorbent and hence many researchers have made interest towards the
development of many adsorbents which are being good alternatives for
commercial adsorbents like activated carbon [1]. But commercially available
activated carbon is costly, so there is need to develop economical alternative to
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
115
activated carbon. In the present study, wood apple shell activated carbon as
economical and effective adsorbent was developed to get maximum adsorption as
well as used to study the isotherm and kinetic models.
3.2 LITERATURE SURVEY OF ADSORPTION OF Cd(II)
With better awareness of the problems associated with cadmium came an
increase in research studies related to methods of removing cadmium from waste
water, for which a number of technologies have been developed over the years.
The process of adsorption is considered as one of the most suitable methods of the
removal of contaminants from water and a number of low cost adsorbents have
been reported for the removal of heavy metals (ions) from aqueous solutions [14].
Several types of adsorbents are developed to get enhanced adsorption
capacity in inexpensive way. In this invention many researchers have contributed
for development of adsorbents from natural sources, industrial wastes, agricultural
wastes, food waste etc. Amongst various adsorbent the application of riverbed
sand for adsorptive separation of cadmium from aqueous solutions had studied and
0.150 mg/g as adsorption capacity and 56.4% removal of Cd(II) was reported at
298 K [15]. The volcanic rocks, Pumice and Scoria had been used for adsorption
purpose, rock types which are readily available in Ethiopia and other countries,
had 3.84 and 2.24 mg/g adsorption capacity respectively [16]. Local United Arab
Emirates (UEA) sand as a low cost adsorbent was investigated by L. Pappalardo et
al. (2010). The removal efficiency of Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Ni(II) from
aqueous solution by white, yellow and red UAE sand at 298 K was found capacity
as with sand yellow > white > red. In case of metal ion Pb(II), Cu(II), Cd(II) and
Ni(II) the removal efficiencies were, respectively 95, 86, 33 and 23% for yellow
sand; 89, 86, 30 and 18% for white sand; and 75, 63, 12 and 13% for red sand,
where results indicated that the removal of Cd(II) was not significant [17]. The
mesoporous silica (SBA-15) has been chemically modified with 2-
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
116
mercaptopyrimidine and 3-chloropropyltriethoxysilane prior to immobilization on
the support. The results indicate that under the optimum conditions, the maximum
adsorption value for Cd(II) was 111.3 mg/g, where as the adsorption capacity of
the unmodified mesoporous silica was only 4.50 m/g [18].
Like sand, the various types of local clays are being used anciently. Y. C.
Sharma (2006) had used indigenous clay i.e. china clay as adsorbent and 80.3%
removal at low concentration of metal ion was reported at pH 6.5 [19, 20]. Local
illitic clay, from Jebel Tejra located at South West of Tunisia in North Africa, was
studied for removal of Cr(III) and Cd(II) and found to show 35.70 mg/g and 52.5
mg/g adsorption capacity respectively. In this study it requires 20 h for maximum
adsorption [21]. Brazilian vermiculite was used for the removal of specific toxic
metal as zinc, cadmium, chromium and manganese from aqueous solution.
Amongst all, Cd(II) had been maximum adsorbed to 63.281 mg/g while other
Cr(III), Zn(II), Mn(II) reported as, 39.05, 41.77, 31.53 mg/g [22]. C. N. Haas and
N. D. Horowitz (1986) had determined the chemical conditions which would favor
such binding in the Cd-kaolinite system. Alginic and humic acid, both of which
are sorbable, were found to enhance Cd uptake by kaolinite [23]. Modification of
kaolinite clay mineral with orthophosphate (p-modified sample) enhanced
adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solutions of the metal ions. In
binary solution of same, the removal of Cd(II) by orthophosphate modified
kaolinite clay and unmodified kaolinite clay were found to be 14.03 mg/g and 9.23
mg/g respectively [24]. In recent trade, the polymers are emerging and found
successful towards modification of the clay. Kaolinite clay was treated with
polyvinyl alcohol to produce a novel water stable composite called polymer clay
composite adsorbent. This modified adsorbent was found to have a maximum
adsorption capacity for Cd(II) of 1236 mg/g [25].
Loess soils in China have proven to be a potential adsorbent for Cd(II)
removal from waste water. The adsorption capacity of Loess towards Cd(II) has
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
117
been reported to be about 9.37 mg/g [26]. The adsorption of heavy metal cations
Pb(II), Cr(III), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous solution by a mine tailing
which mainly contains muscovite was investigated. The maximum adsorption
capacity (molar basis) followed the order of Cr(III) > Pb(II) > Cu(II) > Ni(II) >
Cd(II). The adsorption capacities for Cd(II) were found to be 3.52 and 8.83 mg/g
at 303 and 323 K respectively [27]. Calcitic limestone was used as more effective
adsorbent for lead but it had very less capacity towards the cadmium. Limestone
solid with 41.0% of calcite was found to be most effective in removing Pb(II) with
a maximum adsorption capacity of 40 mg/g, while maximum cadmium adsorption
capacity was 1.3 mg/g [28]. Jordanian low grade phosphate is suitable adsorbent
for Zn(II) and Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions in single or binary systems.
It has higher affinity for Zn(II) than that for Cd(II). The Langmuir adsorption
capacity 10.32 mg/g for zinc and 7.54 mg/g for cadmium was reported [29]. The
common minerals or low grade ore waste was used for the Cd(II) removal.
Synthetic goethite prepared by ageing a ferric hydroxide gel at high pH and room
temperature was used and shows the lowest initially adsorbed Cd(II)
approximately 45% [30]. Low grade manganese ore (LMO) of Orissa containing
58.37% SiO2, 25.05% MnO2, 8.8% Al2O3, and 5.03% Fe2O3 as the main
constituents was taken to study its adsorption behaviour for Pb(II), Cd(II) and
Zn(II) from aqueous solutions. Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacities for
Pb(II), Cd(II) and Zn(II) were estimated to be 142.85, 59.17 and 98.0 mg/g of
LMO respectively [31]. The feasibility of using hematite for the removal of Cd(II)
from aqueous solutions was investigated by employing an adsorption technique;
the maximum removal was found to be 98% of the cadmium at 293 K and pH 9.2
after 2 h [32]. Colemanite ore waste (CW) is a waste material that originated from
boron plants. It is primarily composed of fine particles of silica, calcium, boron,
magnesium, iron and potassium oxides. The adsorption capacity of CW was found
to be 33.6 mg/g for Pb(II) and 29.7 mg/g for Cd(II) ions [33].
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
118
Amongst the various adsorbents, zeolite is one of the well known
adsorbent, the equilibrium of adsorption of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) on regional
low cost natural clinoptilolite containing zeolite tuff (ZEO) and commercial
granulated activated carbon (GAC) was studied. The same metal ion selectivity
series, Pb(II) > Cd(II) > Zn(II), was obtained for both adsorbent and alone Cd(II)
had 5.157 and 17.153 mg/g adsorption capacity by ZEO and GAC respectively
[34].
Chitosan is obtained from the deacetylation of the natural biopolymer
chitin, found in crustaceous shells, insects, and fungal cell walls. For chitosan
maximum adsorption capacity was reported as 557 and 499 mg/g at 1000 mg/dm3
of Pb(II) and Cd(II) metal ions in the solution [35]. Chitosan consists of β-(1,4)-2-
acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose and β-(1,4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose units
and contains high contents of amino and hydroxyl groups, which favors the
modification of this biopolymer and the introduction of new functional groups; it
had the adsorption capacity for cadmium 83.75 mg/g [36]. Chitosan was coated
on perlite, and the coated adsorbent was prepared as spherical beads. The
maximum adsorption capacity of chitosan coated perlite beads was determined to
be 178.6 mg/g of bead at 298 K when the Cd(II) concentration was 5000 mg/dm3
at pH 6.0 [37]. Chitosan developed with alumina which reported improvement in
adsorption capacity with increasing in amount of alumina; a maximum recovery of
77% for Cd(II) and 75% for Cr(III) at 30 min was reported [38]. Chitosan
phthalocyanine complex finds applications in heavy metal removal in order of Pb
(98.8%) > Ni (43.6%) > Cd (39.8%) > As (18.0%) and also for adsorption of
several mutagens and carcinogens [39]. Porous beads were prepared by mixing a
chitosan solution in acetic acid and a pectinate solution in water. The obtained
suspension was dropped into a CaCl2 solution. This had 95% removal capacity for
cadmium after 150 min [40].
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
119
Many researchers have developed the new adsorbents like polymers,
carbon nanotubes or impregnated the substances with polymer. Novel
nanocomposite adsorbent materials were synthesized by dehydroxylation
condensation of tetraethoxy silane in the presence of guar gum-graft-
polyacrylamide using ammonium hydroxide as catalyst and ethanol as co-solvent.
The maximum adsorption capacity for the composite was found to be significantly
very high i.e. 2000 mg/g [41]. Natural biosorbent like tamarind fruit shell was
polymerized with formaldehyde having sulphonic acid groups and it had 92.988
mg/g Cd(II) ion adsorption capacity [42]. A Cadmium imprinted mercapto
functionalized silica gel adsorbent was synthesized via a surface imprinting
technique for selective adsorbent of Cd(II) ion in aqueous solution. The adsorbent
of Cd(II) ion imprinted ionic polymer (Cd(II)-IIP) has higher capacity and
selectivity than the non imprinted polymer (NIP) adsorbent. Adsorption capacity
of Cd(II)-IIP and NIP adsorbents has 83.89 and 35.91 mg/g respectively [43].
Commercially available resins were utilized to report the good Cd(II) adsorption
capacity. Duolite ES 467 has 13.77mg/g adsorption capacity [44] while, D152
resin [45] and MnO2-loaded D301 [46] shows the 378 and 21.45 mg/g adsorption
capacity respectively.
Carbonaceous nanostructures of different forms, specifically as single and
multiwalled carbon nanotubes are currently considered to be the key elements in
nanotechnology. These are being extensively studied to take advantage of their
properties in numerous fields. The adsorption capacity of nitrogen-doped
multiwalled carbon nanotubes for Cd(II) and Pb(II) was reported 9.33 and 28.80
mg/g respectively [47]. Carbon nanotubes were oxidized with H2O2, KMnO4 and
HNO3; however Cd(II) adsorption capacity was only 1.1 mg/g for carbon
nanotubes, while it reaches 2.6, 5.1 and 11.0 mg/g respectively with oxidized
carbon nanotubes [48]. Surface functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes
by ethylenediamine, via chemical modification of carboxyl groups, using O-(7-
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
120
azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N, N, N’, N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate, was
performed with maximum capacity 25.7 mg/g, at 318 K [49].
Fly ash is a waste substance from thermal power plants, steel mills, etc.
and found in abundance all over the world. In recent years, utilization of fly ash
has gained much attention in public and industry, which helps to reduce the
environmental burden and enhance economic benefit. Chemical treatment of fly
ash converts it into a more efficient adsorbent for gas and water cleaning.
Investigations also revealed that unburned carbon component in fly ash plays an
important role in adsorption capacity [50]. The equilibrium adsorption is affected
by the initial pH of the solution and was shown by using bagasse fly ash, which is
a waste material obtained from the flue gas of the bagasse fired boilers of sugar
mills, having adsorption capacity 6.194 mg/g [51]. In another case with same
adsorbent 90% removal of cadmium was reported in about 60 min with 1.24 mg/g
adsorption capacity [52]. Fired coal fly ash, is the residue from lignite combustion
recovered from cyclones and electrostatic filters of the power plant and is
produced worldwide in millions of tones. Fly ash was shaped into pellets with
diameter between 3–8 mm, high relative porosity and very good mechanical
strength which had the adsorption capacities of 20.92 and 18.98 mg/g respectively
for copper and cadmium metal ion [53]. Like fly ash other industrial wastes were
used for the removal of cadmium. The electroplating industry has the metal sludge
as waste which shows 40 mg/g adsorption capacity at 298 K to remove the Cd(II)
metal ion [54]. The manufacture of phosphoric acid by wet process generates the
phosphogypsum, a waste material which shows the good adsorption capacity. The
maximum adsorption capacity of lime preconditioned phosphogypsum was found
to be 131.58 mg/g [55]. Turkish tea waste (fibrous) obtained from various tea-
processing factories was investigated for the removal of Cu(II) and Cd(II) from
single (non-competitive) and binary (competitive) aqueous systems. The
maximum adsorption capacities of Cu(II) and Cd(II) per gram tea waste were
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
121
calculated as 8.64±0.51 and 11.29±0.48 mg for single and 6.65±0.31 and
2.59±0.28 mg for binary systems, respectively [56]. Along with waste, the
industrial fungus, Rhizopus cohni, was used as an efficient adsorbent giving the
maximum uptake of cadmium 40.5 mg/g in the optimal conditions [57].
The food waste from food industries or domestic mainly contain the
cellulosic matrix rich of potential metal binding active sites which help to enhance
the adsorption. Areca nut is known since the pre-Christian era and is still very
popular chewing nut in different area of the world. Areca catechu produces the
well-known betel nut of commerce, which is in great demand in eastern countries
for chewing. This when used as adsorbent shows the maximum uptake 1.12 mg/g
for cadmium [58]. The vegetable waste was also reported as adsorbent. Orange
bark, olive cores and olive waste were used as adsorbent which had the adsorption
capacity, 31.01, 12.56 and 6.55 mg/g respectively [59]. Orange peel is one of the
valuable biomass wastes. In world, orange takes up 75% of the total citrus fruits.
Orange waste from the orange juice industry can be considered as a potential
adsorbent. Cadmium uptake is strongly affected by pH, when the pH was
increased from 2 to 6, the percentage of cadmium uptake for a cadmium solution
of 100 mg/dm3 increases from 8 to 98% [60]. Orange peel was washed with 20%
iso-propyl alcohol and alkali saponification had done with NaOH and this material
was modified with oxalic acid which gives 127.01 mg/g adsorption capacity of
Cd(II) ion [61]. In another report the orange waste material was studied for the
effects of alkali saponification, different cross linking temperatures and different
citric acid concentrations on the adsorbent characters and discovered that the
optimum cross linking temperature was 353 K and the optimum citric acid
concentration was 67.44 g/dm3. The maximum cadmium capacity was found to be
101 mg/g in 120 min at pH 6 [62]. The waste pulp of sugar beet remaining from
extraction of sugar was used as adsorbent for Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions. The
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
122
maximum metal adsorption capacity of adsorbent was 46.1 mg/g for Cd(II) and
43.5 for Pb(II) ion at 298 K [63].
There are numerous numbers of adsorbents commercially available but
amongst them few are effectively applied and they are expensive so there is need
of developing the alternatives for same. The biosorption of Cd(II) and Zn(II) ions
on to dried Fontinalis antipyretica, a widely spread aquatic moss is reported. The
maximum biosorption capacity of 28.0 mg/g of cadmium was reported which was
independent on temperature. Cadmium uptake was unaffected by the presence of
calcium ions [64]. Dead red macroalga Mastocarpus stellatus was used for
determination of the adsorption of Cd(II) in which isotherms at constant pH
showed uptake values as 55.08 mg/g (at pH 2.4), 62.95 mg/g (at pH 4) and 66.32
mg/g (at pH 6) [65]. Another red alga Ceramium virgatum was reported with 39.7
mg/g adsorption capacity [66]. Cadmium (II) adsorption properties of pre-treated
biomass of marine alga Durvillaea potatorum were investigated. At pH 5, the
maximum adsorption capacity of Cd(II) of the pre-treated biomass was 123.64
mg/g [67]. Biosorption of Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution onto immobilized
cells of Pycnoporus sanguineus was investigated in a batch system. The results
showed that biosorption of Cd(II) ions was spontaneous and of endothermic nature
and with 3.18 mg/g adsorption capacity [68].
Sheep manure waste (SMW) had been shown to be very efficient in
removing nickel and cadmium from dilute aqueous solutions which shows the
relatively higher affinity for cadmium binding than that for nickel. The removal of
cadmium was up to 71% when Cd(II) concentration was 100 ppm and SMW
adsorbent 8 mg/dm3 [69]. Crayfish carapace was applied to remove divalent heavy
metal ions Cu, Cd, Zn and Pb from wastewater where recorded maximum uptakes
are of 200, 217.39, 80, and 322.58 mg/g for Cu, Cd, Zn, and Pb, respectively [70].
Cadmium, lead and nickel from industrial waste waters have been separated by
using tea waste as a natural adsorbent. The removal efficiency was highest for lead
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
123
and was less for cadmium. The removal efficiency was found to be 100% for lead,
for nickel 85.7 and 77.2% for cadmium [71]. Along with this, brewer’s yeast was
used as adsorbent for the removal of Ni(II) and Cd(II) metal ions from aqueous
solution. Maximum uptakes of Ni(II) and Cd(II) by brewer’s yeast were estimated
to be 5.34 and 10.17 mg/g, respectively [72].
The agro wastes are abundantly available all over which introduced a new
application as an adsorbent in recent years by many researchers. The feasibility of
using various agricultural residues viz. sugarcane bagasse (SCB), maize corncob
(MCC) and Jatropha oil cake (JOC) for the removal of Cd(II) from aqueous
solution is checked. The maximum adsorption of cadmium (II) metal ions was
observed at pH 6 for all the adsorbents viz. 99.5, 99 and 85% for JOC, MCC and
SCB respectively [73]. Grape bagasse as an alternative natural adsorbent to
remove Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from laboratory effluent was developed. The
Langmuir model shows adsorption to be 86.99 and 88.68 mg/g for Cd(II) and
Pb(II) respectively [74]. Coconut copra meal, a waste product of coconut oil
production used as adsorbent for biosorption of cadmium ions from solution,
which was spontaneous and exothermic process. The saturated monolayer
biosorption capacity of the copra meal for cadmium ions at 299K was calculated
to be 4.92 mg/g [75]. Husk of Lathyrus sativus was used as adsorbent which had
the very fast process and more than 90% of the total adsorption took place within
the first 5 min having final maximum adsorption capacity 35 mg/g [76]. Corncob
is plentifully available agro waste; it is used as it is natural and had 0.0772 mmol/g
adsorption capacity [77]. The modifications were carried out in corncob to
improve the capacity and the Cd(II) ions were adsorbed mainly at the carboxylic
sites. The adsorption capacity is directly proportionally to the concentration of
carboxylic sites in the corncob. The adsorption capacity of natural corncob was
increased to 10.8 and 3.8 times when the corncob was oxidized with citric acid and
nitric acid respectively. The adsorption capacity of natural corncob was 4.73 mg/g
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
124
and that of oxidized with 0.6 M citric acid and 1M nitric acid 52.1 mg/g 19.3 mg/g
was observed respectively [78]. The corn stalk modified using graft
copolymerization to produce absorbent and raw corn stalk showed the 22.17 and
3.81 mg/g adsorption capacity respectively [79].
The leaves of olive tree (Olea europaea) were used as adsorbent by three
methods and they had monolayer adsorption capacity as 42.19, 55.87 and 64.94
mg/g for the conventional method, the ultrasound assisted method and the
combined method, respectively [80]. Olive cake is a waste of olive factory and
usually used as fertilizer and as feeding material. Its structure contains organic
compounds like lignocellulosic material, polyphenols and also amino acid, protein,
oil, and tannins. It is used as adsorbent and Langmuir adsorption capacity was
found to be 10.560 mg/g and Freundlich adsorption capacity 0.196 mg/g at 308 K
and pH 4.50 [81]. The use of natural adsorbent such as olive cake to replace
expensive imported synthetic adsorbent is particularly appropriate for developing
countries. Cadmium ions from its aqueous solution using olive cake as adsorbent
shown that with an increase in temperature from 301 to 318 K, the adsorption
capacity is decreased from 65.4 to 44.4 mg/g [82]. The removal characteristics of
cadmium and nickel ions from aqueous solution by exhausted olive cake ash were
studied. The estimated maximum capacities of nickel and cadmium ions adsorbed
were 8.38 and 7.32 mg/g, respectively [83]. An agricultural solid by-product olive
stone was converted to activated carbon with 20% ZnCl2 solution and was found
to be the best sample of the produced activated carbons from olive stone with the
specific surface area of 790.25 m2/g and has 1.851 mg/g adsorption capacity at
293K [84].
Rice husk as well its modified conversions or activated carbon were used
as adsorbents. In case of rice husk the maximum adsorption reported was 98.65%
with 21.28 mg/g adsorption capacity [85]. Some simple and low-cost chemical
modifications resulted in increasing the adsorption capacity of raw rice husk
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
125
(RRH) from 8.58 mg/g to 11.12, 20.24, 16.18 mg/g and reducing the equilibrium
time from 10 h of RRH to 2, 4 and 1 h for epichlorohydrin treated rice husk,
NaOH treated rice husk, sodium bicarbonate treated rice husk respectively [86].
Low cost rice husk ash shows maximum metal ions removal of 35.3% for Zn(II),
27.8% for Ni(II) and 23.3% for Cd(II) at initial concentration of 500 mg/dm3 at 10
kg/m3 adsorbent dosage [87]. Novel bio-adsorbent wheat bran has been
successfully utilized for the removal of Cd(II) from wastewater. The maximum
removal of Cd(II) was found to be 87.15% at pH 8.6, at initial Cd(II)
concentration of 12.5 mg/dm3 with 0.703 mg/g adsorption capacity [88]. In one
another case wheat bran was used without any treatment and 15.71 mg/g
adsorption capacity was reported [89]. By using sulphuric acid as impregnating
agent for wheat bran the cadmium adsorption capacity was increased from 43.1
mg/g to 101 mg/g [90].
Various biomasses were used as adsorbent like, juniper wood and bark was
applied to adsorb cadmium. The pseudo second order had given the equilibrium
adsorption capacity of Cd(II) 10.30 mg/g for juniper bark and 3.18 mg/g for
juniper wood [91]. Using maize tassel as an alternative adsorbent for the removal
of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solutions, an adsorption capacity of 79.1%
for Cr(VI) at pH 2, exposure time of 1h at 298 K and maximum adsorption
capacity of Cd(II) of 88% was obtained in the pH range of 5-6 at 298 K after
exposure time of 1 h [92]. Castor (Ricinus communis) seed hull is an agricultural
residue obtained during processing of castor seeds before oil extraction. It is high
in fiber content that is expected to provide ample negatively charged sites for
capturing positively charged species which explored 6.983 mg/g as adsorption
capacity at pH 5.8 [93]. The biosorption capability of Ulmus leaves and their ash
for Cd(II) ions removal from wastewaters has been investigated which was found
to be rapid and reached to 92% of equilibrium capacity in 60 minutes [94]. A
biosorbent, neem leaf powder (NLP), was prepared from the mature leaves of the
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
126
Azadirachta indica (neem) tree. Adsorption increases from 8.8% at pH 4.0 to
70.0% at pH 7.0 and 93.6% at pH 9.5. The Langmuir monolayer adsorption
capacity for Cd(II) of NLP was 158 mg/g reported from aqueous solution [95]. In
another case the Cd(II) was removed by neem saw dust which has 26.73 mg/g and
neem bark has 25.57 mg/g adsorption capacity respectively [96]. Tree sawdust of
walnut in Turkey is explored for the removal of toxic heavy metal ions such as
Pb(ll), Cd(1I) and Ni(II) from aqueous solutions, amongst them Cd(II) was
adsorbed to 5.76, 5.69, 5.70 mg/g with respect at 298, 318, 333 K temperature
respectively [97].
Extensive research has been carried out during the past few years to find
low cost and high capacity adsorbents for the removal of metal ions. A wide range
of adsorbents have been developed and tested, including several activated carbons
such as, bone char which has high adsorption capacities for cadmium, copper and
zinc ions, namely 53.62, 45.06 and 33.01 mg/g respectively [98]. The jackfruit
peels, an agricultural waste from food processing industry, after carbonization can
be employed for the economical removal of Cd(II) from aqueous solution. With
increase in Cd(II) concentration from 20 to 40 mg/dm3, the amount of Cd(II)
adsorbed increased from 28.3 to 50.6 mg/g at equilibrium time [99]. In another
report the jack fruit seed carbon (JFSC) was compared with the commercial
activated carbon (CAC) which concluded that, Cd(II) was found to adsorb strongly
on the surface of both commercial activated carbon and jack fruit seed. JFSC
possess 1.215 mg/g and CAC had 0.695 mg/g as adsorption capacity, hence it is an
effective adsorbent for the removal of Cd(II) [100]. The walnut (Juglans regia L.),
hazelnut (Corylus avellana), pistachio (Pistaca), almond (Amygdolus) shells and
apricot (Armeniaca bulgar) stone precursor were found to be good raw materials
for developing activated carbons. Cd(II) was removed by walnut, hazelnut,
almond and apricot as 50.9, 90.5, 74.8 and 86.0% respectively while pistachio had
shown only 33.8% removal [101].
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
127
Ceiba pentandra tree is widely distributed in the deciduous forests of
western and eastern India especially in hotter areas. The plant parts, root, bark,
gum and leaf have high medicinal applications except hulls. Activated carbon
prepared from Ceiba pentandra hulls, an agricultural solid waste by-product was
used for removal of copper and cadmium and adsorption capacity was found to be
20.8 and 19.5 mg/g, respectively [102]. Another waste, bean husk (Phaseolus
vulgaris) was developed into activated carbon at 643 K in Argon (Ar), followed by
chemical activation using HNO3. The maximum uptake of Cd(II) was 11, 60 and
180 mg/g for commercial carbon, bean husk carbon and activated carbon,
respectively [103]. Bamboo charcoal was produced from the rapidly growing
moso bamboo plants, which had the maximum adsorption capacity of 12.08 mg/g
[104]. Cashew nut shells were converted into activated carbon powders using
KOH activation plus CO2 gasification at 1027 K. The adsorption capacity of
activated carbon prepared from cashew nut shells for Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions was
reported 28.90 and 14.29 mg/g respectively [105]. Apricot stones were carbonized
and activated after treatment with sulphuric acid (1:1) at 473 K having ability to
adsorb metal ions were obtained in the descending order of Cr(VI) > Cd(II) >
Co(II) > Cr(III) > Ni(II) > Cu(II) > Pb(II). Highest adsorption occurred at pH 1–2
for Cr(VI) and at pH 3–6 for the rest of the metal ions, respectively. In case of
Cd(II), as the pH was increased from 1 to 6 the capacity was also increased from
3.08 to 3.57 mg/g [106]. Recently a new form of activated carbon has appeared:
carbon aerogel, which has the maximum adsorption capacity of 15.53 mg/g of
Cd(II) [107].
The adsorption technique is the effective and economical to application
level. The regular commercial activated carbon is expensive, so there is a need of
alternatives for same. In present study, wood apple (Limonia acidissima) shell
activated carbon has developed as an adsorbent. The activated carbon developed
by using impregnating agent which has helped to make the porous which is
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
128
responsible for the more adsorption capacity of metal ion. In present study, well
known isotherms are applied, while kinetic study was carried out using two
models. The thermodynamic study was carried for Cd(II) adsorption on Wood
Apple Shell Activated Carbon (WASAC).
The wood apple has medicinal uses as well as it is used in making sweet in
Kolhapur and Belgaum District (India). Wood apple shell is unemployed easily
and abundantly available which could be applied as current need of humankind to
remove heavy metal pollutants as its application. It helps to remove Cd(II) very
effectively and economical.
3.3 EXPERIMENTAL
3.3.1 Preparation of materials and characterization of adsorbent
Sample of Limonia acidissima (wood apple) shell was collected from local
market. The procedure of preparation of material was followed as that reported in
Chapter 2 (2.3.1). The stock solution of Cd(II) 1g/dm3 was prepared from
CdSO4.8H2O. By using this stock solution the desired dilutions were made and
used throughout the study.
The developed adsorbent was characterized as discussed in chapter 2 (2.3.2).
3.3.2 Batch adsorption experiment
Batch mode adsorption studies were carried out with 400 mg of adsorbent
and 50 mL of Cd(II) solution of desired concentrations at an initial pH of 6.5 in
250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and agitated at 150 rpm for predetermined time
intervals at constant temperature on an orbital shaker. The concentration of free
Cd metal ion in the effluent was determined with atomic adsorption spectroscopy
(A Analyzer 300).
Adsorption isotherm study was done with varying the concentration
of Cd(II) from 100 to 420 mg/dm3 at 299 ± 2 K, pH 6.5 and time of contact 4h at
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
129
150 rpm in the Erlenmeyer flasks. For the thermodynamic study, temperature was
varied from 303 K to 323 K. The equilibrium adsorption capacity of WASAC was
evaluated using the equation, which is given in chapter 2 (2.3.3).
3.4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 3.4.1 Effect of pH
The effect of pH on adsorption of Cd(II) was studied with varying the pH
from 1to 9. The concentration of Cd(II) was taken to be 100 mg/dm3 while the
volume of solution was kept to 50 mL, at constant temperature 299 ± 2 K and it
was agitated for 4 h at 150 rpm. From Fig. 3.1, (Table 3.1) it clearly indicates that,
the adsorption was significant above pH 6. For the further study pH 6.5 was
confirmed because, above neutral pH the reaction mixture forms precipitate. The
cadmium percentage removal and adsorption capacity was found to be 98.80% and
12.35 mg/g respectively for WASAC.
The pH of the solution was found to have a great effect on the adsorption
of Cd(II) ions. The adsorption increased sharply in the pH range 3 to 5 attaining
almost a constant value at higher pH. Such results could be attributed on the basis
of the change in the carbon surface charge with change in pH of the solution [108].
The lower adsorption capacity observed at low pH may be explained on
the basis on electrostatic repulsive forces between positively charged H3O+ and
Cd(II) ions. At low pH values, the concentration of H3O+ is higher than that of
Cd(II) ions and, hence, these ions are adsorbed on the active sites of activated
adsorbents, leaving Cd(II) ions free in the solution. When the pH was increased,
Cd(II) ions would replace with H3O+ ions. Competing effect of H3O
+ decreased
with increase of the pH, which increases the adsorption yield of the Cd(II) ions.
The adsorption capacity increases with increase in pH value up to 6 and remains
constant up to pH 9.0 but we have considered range of pH 6 - 7; as the removal
takes place by adsorption as well as precipitation of Cd(II) ions in the form of
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
130
Cd(OH)2. The decrease in adsorption yield at alkaline conditions can be attributed
to the formation of Cd(OH)3− ions taking place as a result of dissolution of
Cd(OH)2 due to its amphoter characteristic. The hydrolysis and precipitation of
metal ions affect adsorption by changing the concentration and form of soluble
metal species those are available for adsorption. The hydrolysis of Cd(II) ions may
be represented by following reaction,
Cd2+ + 2nH2O ↔ Cd(OH)n2−n +nH3O+ (1)
Depending upon the pH of the solution, various species of cadmium can be formed
during the hydrolysis. The hydrolysis extent of Cd(II) ions is unimportant up to
approximately pH 7.5 and cadmium is in the form of Cd2+ ions at this pH. For that
reason it can be said that the adsorption mechanisms can be explained on the basis
of H3O+–Cd2+ exchange reaction [90].
Initial pH of solution was varied within the range 1 – 7. This pH range was
chosen in order to avoid metal hydroxide precipitation. The metal hydroxide
precipitation was observed from pH 7.5 [109]. The effect of initial pH of solution
on the sorption dynamics for cadmium onto WASAC is shown in Fig. 3.1 (Table
3.1). It was observed from the results, negligible precipitations occurred at
pH<8.0, but at higher pH (namely pH 12) more precipitation occurred, and the
initial concentration (C0 = 100 mg/dm3) decreased to 89.4 mg/dm3.
3.4.2 Effect of time
It’s very normal observation among all adsorption studies that, as per the
increase in the contact time there is enhancement in the adsorption of adsorbate in
both cases in percentage as well as amount adsorbed. This is probably due to a
larger surface area of the WASAC being available at the beginning for the
adsorption of cadmium. As the surface adsorption sites become exhausted, the
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
131
uptake rate is controlled by the rate at which the adsorbate is transported from the
exterior to the interior sites of the adsorbent particles. Present experiments were
done at the constant temperature. The cadmium metal ion concentration was 100
mg/dm3 while, other remaining conditions pH, rpm etc. were constant. Effect of
shaking period was done at various time intervals from 30 min to 360 min. The
increase in percentage adsorption from 31.78% to 98.80% (Table 3.2, Fig. 3.2)
was observed up to 220 min. After that, there was no any significant change
observed. So, for further study the 240 min was fixed as contact time.
3.4.3 Effect of initial concentration of Cd(II)
The effect of initial cadmium concentration in the range of 100 to 420
mg/dm3 on adsorption was investigated (Fig. 3.3). Along with pH all parameters
were kept constant in this study. It is evident from the Fig. 3.3 that, as the
concentration of Cd(II) was increased, the amount adsorbed was increased but,
there was decrease in percentage removal. It is because, the initial cadmium
concentration provides the necessary driving force to overcome the resistances to
the mass transfer of cadmium between the aqueous phase and the solid phase. The
increase in initial cadmium concentration also enhances the interaction between
cadmium and WASAC i.e. adsorbent. Therefore, an increase in initial
concentration of cadmium enhances the adsorption uptake of cadmium and results
in higher adsorption, while the adsorption was carried out for fixed number of
active sites, there was decrease in percentage removal of Cd(II). The amount
adsorbed of Cd(II) was increased from 12.35 to 27.64 mg/g (Table 3.3) as the
initial metal ion concentration increased.
3.4.4 Effect of adsorbent dosage
Adsorption dosage is one of the vital parameter in the study. The adsorbent
dosage i.e. WASAC was varied from 50 − 400 mg/dm3, to study the effect on the
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
132
adsorption of Cd(II). To study this effect, the concentration of Cd(II) was taken as
100 mg/dm3 and other parameters were kept constant. As the amount of adsorbent
was increased, the amount adsorbed and percentage removal of Cd(II) was
respectively increased. The adsorbent dosage affects directly on the adsorption
capacity, as there is increase in dosage more active sites becomes available for
adsorbate and it was confirmed from the Fig. 3.4 and Table 3.4. The maximum
amount of 12.35 mg/g of Cd(II) was adsorbed for 400 mg of WASAC and 98.80%
removal of Cd(II) was found, so throughout the study the 400 mg/dm3 amount of
WASAC as adsorbent was kept constant.
3.4.5 Effect of agitation speed
The agitation speed effect on the adsorption amount and percentage
removal has investigated. To study this parameter, rpm was varied from 50-200
rpm. For this experiment, the period of agitation was 4 h and temperature was 299
± 2 K with remaining all optimum conditions kept constant. In present study, it
was observed that, the interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent was effective
at high speed i.e. 150 rpm and more up to 200 rpm. It is very clear from the Fig.
3.5 (Table 3.5) that, there was increase in adsorption with respect to rpm and
above 150 rpm no any significant change was observed. So the rpm was fixed at
150 for the further study.
3.4.6 Adsorption isotherm
Adsorption equilibrium isotherms are basic requirements for designing any
adsorption system. The adsorption isotherm indicates how the adsorbate
distributes between the liquid phase and the solid phase when the adsorption
process reaches an equilibrium state. Fig. 3.6 (Table 3.6) presents the plot of
amount of cadmium adsorbed against its concentration in aqueous phase at
equilibrium. Isotherm data obtained with a range of initial cadmium concentration
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
133
showed an increase in the amount of cadmium adsorbed when the initial metal
concentration was raised from 100 to 420 mg/dm3. The shape of the curves clearly
indicated that the isotherms for all temperatures belong to L-type according to the
classification of equilibrium isotherm in solution [89].
Adsorption isotherms express the mathematical relationship between the
quantity of adsorbate and equilibrium concentration of adsorbate remaining in the
solution at a constant temperature. The adsorption data has been analyzed with,
Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.
3.4.7 Langmuir isotherm
Langmuir isotherm model is based on assumption that a saturated
monolayer of adsorbate molecules is present on the adsorbent surface, the
adsorption energy is constant and there is no migration of adsorbate molecules in
the surface plane when maximum adsorption capacity occurs. The Langmuir
equation is as given in chapter 2 (2.4.7).
A plot of Ce/qe versus Ce (Fig. 3.7, Table 3.7) indicates a straight line of
slope 1/qm and an intercept of 1/KLqm. A further analysis of the Langmuir equation
can be made on the basis of a dimensionless equilibrium parameter, RL also known
as the separation factor, as discussed in chapter 2 (2.4.7).
The Langmuir constants (qm and KL) are calculated from the plots (Fig.
3.7) and are presented in Table 3.8. The data related to the equilibrium obeyed
well the Langmuir models. The maximum adsorption capacity of adsorption of
Cd(II) by Langmuir isotherm was 28.33 mg/g which is more agreed to calculated
value 27.64 mg/g (Table 3.8). The value of was RL subsist in between 0.049 to
0.896 which indicates the favour of adsorption i.e. formation of monolayer of
Cd(II) ions on the surface of WASAC.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
134
3.4.8 Freundlich isotherm
The Freundlich isotherm model is the empirical relationship and is based
on an assumption that the adsorption energy of a metal ion binding to a site of an
adsorbent depends on whether the adjacent sites are already occupied or not. The
experiments were carried out when the agitating period was 4 h and temperature
was 299 ± 2 K with remaining parameters kept steady. The Freundlich equation
used is as given in chapter 2 (2.4.8). The plot the log qe vs. log Ce (Fig. 3.8, Table
3.9) gives a linear trace with a slope of 1/n and intercept of log Kf. The Kf is the
measure of adsorption capacity and n is the adsorption intensity which is given in
table 3.10. The Freundlich adsorption capacity by this plot is 11.280 mg/g and
regression factor (R2) was 0.953.
From the results it was clearly observed that both models were well suited
for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC, but the regression factor as well as the
calculated and experimental values correlates more correctly with the Langmuir
values; on this basis it could be concluded that, Cd(II) ion form monolayer on
surface of WASAC and the adsorption was chemisorption.
3.4.9 Adsorption kinetics
The study of adsorption kinetics describes the solute uptake rate and
evidently these rate controls the residence time of adsorbate uptake at the solid–
solution interface including the diffusion process [96]. The kinetic study for the
adsorption of Cd(II) was conducted at optimum pH 6.5, where maximum
adsorption takes place. The adsorption study was tested for two models i.e. pseudo
first and pseudo second order model. The experiments were carried out for time
intervals varied from the 0 to 240 min at constant temperature, with 100 mg/dm3
concentration of Cd(II) by keeping other parameters constant. The pseudo first
order was studied with Lagergren equation, as discussed in chapter 2 (2.4.9). Plot
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
135
of log (qe − qt) vs. t (Fig. 3.9, Table 3.11) gives a straight line for first order
adsorption kinetics, which allow computation of the adsorption rate constant k1.
For pseudo-second order rate equation was used as discussed chapter 2
(2.4.9). The rate parameters k2 and qe can be directly obtained from the intercept
and slope of the plot of t/qt vs. t (Fig. 3.10, Table 3.12). For pseudo first order and
pseudo second order model the equilibrium adsorption capacity was 13.652 and
17.762 mg/g respectively. The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity was
12.35 mg/g. The rate constant and other results obtained graphically for both
adsorption models are listed in Table 3.13. The calculated and experimental results
reveal that, the pseudo-first order model provided a better approximation to the
experimental kinetic data than the pseudo-second order model for adsorption of
Cd(II) ion from aqueous solution.
3.4.10 Intraparticle diffusion study
There are essentially three consecutive mass transport steps associated with
the adsorption of solute from the solution by an adsorbent. These are (i) film
diffusion, (ii) intraparticle or pore diffusion, and (iii) sorption into interior sites.
The third step is very rapid and hence film and pore transports are the major steps
controlling the rate of adsorption. In order to understand the diffusion mechanism,
kinetic data was further analyzed using the intraparticle diffusion model based on
the theory proposed by Weber and Morris [54]. The amount of cadmium adsorbed
(qt) at time (t), was plotted against (t1/2), from the intraparticle diffusion equation,
(which is discussed in chapter 2 (2.4.10)) and the resulting plot is shown in Fig.
3.11 (Table 3.14). In present experiment, concentration of Cd(II) was 100 mg/dm3
and all other conditions were kept constant including temperature. The rate
constants of intraparticle diffusion are given in Table 3.15. The intraparticle
diffusion process is controlled by the diffusion of ions within the adsorbent.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
136
3.4.11 Adsorption thermodynamics
As the theory of adsorption gives the general information about the
influence of temperature on the adsorption, the study of adsorption
thermodynamic is essential. We have used 420 mg/dm3 Cd(II) ion concentration to
study the adsorption on 400 mg WASAC and agitation was done for 4h at 150
rpm. The adsorption was increased with increase in temperature from 303 to 323
K with 5 K (Fig. 3.12, Table 3.16). This indicates that the adsorption reaction was
endothermic in nature. The enhancement in the adsorption capacity may be due to
the chemical interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent, creation of some new
adsorption sites or the increased rate of intraparticle diffusion of Cd(II) ions into
the pores of the adsorbent at higher temperatures.
For the above condition, the standard Gibb’s energy (∆G○), standard
enthalpy (∆H○) and standard entropy (∆S○) were calculated from well known
standard Gibb’s energy and Van’t Hoff’s equations which as given in chapter 2
(2.4.11). The ∆H○ and ∆S○ were obtained from the slope and intercept of Van’t
Hoff’s plot of lnKc versus 1/T (Fig. 3.13, Table 3.17). The positive value of ΔH○
indicates that the adsorption process is endothermic. The negative values of ΔG○
reflect the feasibility of the process and the values become more negative with
increase in temperature. Standard entropy determines the disorderliness of the
adsorption at solid–liquid interface, Table 3.19 summarizes the results. The
positive value of ΔS° shows that increasing randomness at the solid/liquid
interface during the adsorption of Cd(II) ions on WASAC.
3.5 COMPARISON OF ADSORPTION CAPACITY OF WASAC WITH
OTHER ADSORBENT
In present study, the different parameters were investigated to get
equilibrium concentration as well as to determine the maximum adsorption with
isotherm model. The obtained adsorption capacity has been compared with
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
137
another reported adsorbents and given in Table 3.20, which shows that, the
WASAC has good adsorption capacity.
3.6 CONCLUSION
1) This study clearly suggests that, the use of WASAC as adsorbent is much
effective and economical, as it is abundant. It can be efficiently used to remove
cadmium ions up to 98.80% from aqueous solution.
2) The different operational parameters observed during the process of
investigations reveal that the contact time, initial concentration, adsorbent
mass, pH, stirring speed and temperature govern the overall process of
adsorption.
3) The experimental data fitted for both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The
adsorption constants and regression factor indicates that the Langmuir fits
better than Freundlich isotherm with 28.33 mg/g maximum adsorption
capacity.
4) The increase in the adsorption capacity observed with increasing temperature
showed that the adsorption process was chemisorption, being feasible,
spontaneous and endothermic as confirmed by the evaluation of the relevant
thermodynamic parameters, viz. ∆H0, ΔG0 and ∆S0.
5) Kinetic study of the adsorption was tested with help of pseudo first and pseudo
second order models. From the results it was concluded that, pseudo first order
which has 13.652 mg/g equilibrium adsorption capacity was agreed more
finely than pseudo second order.
6) It could be concluded that, WASAC is a good adsorbent as it is inexpensive
and has high efficiency of adsorption of Cd(II) as well as abundantly available.
It could be applied for removal of Cd(II) from waste water effectively.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
138
Table 3.1
Effect of pH on removal, % and amount adsorbed, mg/g of Cd(II)
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, Time = 240 min. T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation
speed = 150 rpm
pH Amount adsorbed, q mg/g Removal of Cd(II), %
1 4.61 36.88
2 5.32 42.58
3 7.98 63.78
4 10.34 82.73
5 11.79 94.31
6 12.35 98.80
6.5 12.35 98.80
7 12.35 98.80
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
139
Table 3.2
Effect of shaking period on removal, % and amount adsorbed, mg/g of Cd(II)
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
Time, min
Amount adsorbed, qt mg/g
Removal of Cd(II), %
30 3.98 31.78
60 6.56 52.48
90 7.80 62.42
120 10.36 82.22
180 11.35 90.78
210 11.84 94.72
240 12.35 98.80
300 12.35 98.80
360 12.35 98.80
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
140
Table 3.3
Effect of initial concentration of Cd(II) on amount adsorbed mg/g and removal, %
of Cd(II)
Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Initial Conc Cd(II)
mg/dm3
q mg/g amount
adsorbed
Removal of Cd(II) %
100 12.35 98.80
120 14.55 97.03
140 16.59 94.80
160 18.48 92.38
180 18.83 83.67
200 20.22 80.89
220 20.98 76.31
240 21.47 71.55
260 22.64 68.55
280 22.64 64.67
300 24.73 65.95
320 26.21 65.53
340 26.82 63.11
360 27.33 60.72
380 27.47 57.82
400 27.56 55.12
420 27.64 52.64
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
141
Table 3.4
Effect of adsorbent dosage on Cd(II) removal, % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II) = 100 mg/dm3, Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, agitation speed =
150 rpm
WASAC, mg Amount adsorbed, q mg/g Removal of Cd(II) %
50 5.05 5.05
100 6.94 13.88
150 7.25 21.77
200 9.26 37.0.3
250 9.43 47.11
300 10.11 60.63
350 10.81 75.73
370 12.29 90.92
390 12.34 96.24
400 12.35 98.80
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
142
Table 3.5
Effect on agitating speed of Cd(II) on removal, % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, time=240 min, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, rpm= 150
Agitation speed, rpm Amount adsorbed, q mg/g Removal of Cd(II), %
50 4.71 37.67
70 6.53 52.24
100 7.83 62.6
120 10.91 87.30
130 12.21 97.70
140 12.35 98.80
150 12.35 98.80
160 12.35 98.80
180 12.35 98.80
200 12.35 98.80
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
143
Table 3.6
Adsorption isotherm for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Ce q
1.20 12.35
3.56 14.55
7.28 16.59
12.19 18.48
29.38 18.83
38.22 20.22
52.11 20.98
68.27 21.47
81.78 22.64
98.90 22.64
102.15 24.73
110.30 26.21
125.45 26.82
141.40 27.33
160.27 27.47
179.54 27.56
198.92 27.64
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
144
Table 3.7
Langmuir isotherm for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Ce Ce/q
1.20 0.0972
3.56 0.2454
7.28 0.4388
12.19 0.6596
29.38 1.5903
38.22 1.8902
52.11 2.4838
68.27 3.1798
81.78 3.6722
98.90 4.3684
102.15 4.1307
110.30 4.2083
125.45 4.6775
141.40 5.1738
160.27 5.8344
179.54 6.5145
198.92 7.1968
Table 3.8
Langmuir constant for the adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
qm (mg/g) KL (1/mg) R2
28.33 0.0967 0.986
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
145
Table 3.9
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for Cd(II) on WASAC
Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
log Ce log qe
0.792 1.0917
0.5527 1.1628
0.8621 1.2199
1.086 1.2667
1.468 1.2749
1.5823 1.3058
1.7169 1.3218
1.8643 1.3318
1.9127 1.3477
1.9952 1.3549
2.0092 1.3932
2.0426 1.4185
2.0985 1.4285
2.1505 1.4366
2.2049 1.4388
2.2542 1.4403
2.2987 1.4415
Table 3.10
Freundlich constant for the adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Kf n R2
11.280 5.935 0.953
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
146
Table 3.11
Pseudo first order for Cd(II) adsorption on WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
t min log (qe-qt)
0 1.0917
30 0.9227
60 0.7627
90 0.6580
120 0.2989
180 -0.0044
210 -0.2924
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
147
Table 3.12
Pseudo second order for Cd(II) adsorption on WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
t t/qt
0 0
30 7.5377
60 9.1464
90 11.5385
120 11.5830
180 15.8450
210 17.7365
240 19.4332
Table 3.13
Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Cd(II) Ions onto WASAC
Pseudo first order Pseudo second order
qe exp.
(mg/g)
k1x10–3
(min–1)
qe calc.
(mg/g)
R2
k2 x10–3
qe calc.
(mg/g)
R2
12.35
0.65
13.652
0.982
0.0545
17.762
0.988
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
148
Table 3.14
Intraparticle diffusion plot at different temperature for adsorption of Cd(II) on
WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
t 1/2 qt
5.4773 3.98
7.7460 6.56
9.4869 7.80
10.9545 10.36
13.4164 11.35
14.4914 11.84
15.4919 12.35
Table 3.15
Study of intraparticle diffusion of adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
kid
(mg g−1min−1)
R2
0.834
0.961
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
149
Table 3.16
Effect of temperature on amount adsorbed of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II)=420mg/dm3, Time= 240min, pH=6.5, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
T K Amount adsorbed, q mg/g
303 29.638
308 33.598
313 39.737
318 42.210
323 45.983
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
150
Table 3.17
Van't Hoff plots for removal of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd (II)= 420mg/dm3, Time= 240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg,
agitation speed = 150 rpm
1/T lnKc
0.00330 0.8633
0.00324 0.9887
0.00319 1.1566
0.00314 1.217
0.00309 1.3025
Table 3.18
Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption of Cd (II) on WASAC
T K
ΔG○, kJ/mol
∆H○, kJ/mol
∆S○, J/mol k
303 -1.110
1.582
5.707
308 -1.604
313 -1.824
318 -1.971
323 -2.115
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
151
Table 3.19
Comparison of adsorption capacity of WASAC with other adsorbent
Adsorbent qm (mg/g) Reference
Raw corn stalk
Acrylonitrile modified
3.39
12.73
[1]
[1]
Riverbed sand 0.150 [15]
Volcanic rocks a) Pumice
b) Scoria
3.84
2.24
[16]
[16]
Illitic clay 52.5 [21]
Kaolinite clay a) modified
b) unmodified
14.03
9.23
[24]
[24]
Loess soils 9.37 [26]
Mine tailing 3.52 [27]
Jordanian low grade phosphate 7.54 [29]
Zeolite tuff
Granulated activated carbon
5.157
17.153
[34]
[34]
Duolite ES 467 13.77 [44]
Carbon nanotubes
Oxidized with a) H2O2
b) KMnO4
c) HNO3
1.1
2.6
5.1
11.0
[48]
[48]
[48]
[48]
Bagasse fly ash 6.194 [51]
Bagasse fired fly ash 1.24 [52]
Coal fly ash pellets 18.98 [53]
Betel nut 1.12 [58]
Olive cores
Olive waste
12.56
6.55
[59]
[59]
Red alga Ceramium virgatum 39.7 [66]
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
152
Pycnoporus sanguineus 3.18 [68]
Brewer’s yeast 10.17 [72]
Corncob
Oxidized with 1M nitric acid
4.73
19.3
[78]
[78]
Raw corn stalk
Modified using graft copolymerization
3.81
22.17
[79]
[79]
Olive cake 10.56 [81]
Olive stone activated carbons 1.85 [84]
Rice husk 21.28 [85]
Raw rice husk
Epichlorohydrin treated rice husk
NaOH treated rice husk
Sodium bicarbonate treated rice husk
8.58
11.12
20.24
16.18
[86]
[86]
[86]
[86]
Wheat bran 0.703 [88]
Wheat bran 15.71 [89]
Castor (Ricinus communis) seed hull 6.98 [93]
Walnut tree sawdust 5.76 [97]
Jack fruit seed carbon 1.215 [100]
Ceiba pentandra hulls activated carbon 19.5 [102]
Bamboo charcoal 12.08 [104]
Cashew nut shell activated carbon 14.29 [105]
Wood apple shell activated carbon 27.64 Present study
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
153
.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 6 8
pH
Rem
oval o
f C
d(II), %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Am
ou
nt ad
so
rbed
of C
d(II), m
g/g
Fig. 3.1
Effect of pH on removal of Cd(II), % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, time = 240 min. T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation
speed = 150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
154
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
Time, min
Rem
oval o
f C
d(II), %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Am
ount adsorb
ed o
f C
d(II), m
g/g
Fig. 3.2
Effect of shaking period on removal of Cd(II), % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
155
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400 500
Initial conc. Cd(II), mg/dm3
Rem
oval o
f C
d(II), %
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Am
ou
nt ad
so
rbed
of C
d(II), m
g/g
Fig. 3.3
Effect of initial concentration of Cd(II) on amount adsorbed, mg/g and removal, %
of Cd(II)
Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
156
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 100 200 300 400 500
Adsorbent dose mg
Am
ount ad
sorb
ent C
d(II) m
g/g
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rem
oval
Cd(II) %
Fig. 3.4
Effect of adsorbent dosage on Cd(II) removal, % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II) = 100mg/dm3, time=180min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
157
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200 250
rpm
Rem
ova
l of C
d(II), %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Am
ount ad
sorb
ed o
f C
d(II), m
g/g
Fig. 3.5
Effect on agitating speed on removal of Cd(II), % and amount adsorbed, mg/g
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, time=240 min, T= 299 ± 2 0K, WASAC=400 msg, agitation
speed = 150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
158
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50 100 150 200 250
Ce mg/dm3
qe m
g/g
Fig. 3.6
Adsorption isotherm for adsorption of Cd(II) adsorption on WASAC
Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
159
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 50 100 150 200 250
Ce
Ce/q
Fig. 3.7
Langmuir isotherm for adsorption of adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
160
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
log Ce
log
qe
Fig. 3.8
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg, agitation speed = 150
rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
161
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 50 100 150 200 250
t min
log
(q
e-q
t)
Fig. 3.9
Pseudo first order for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
162
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
t min
t/qt
Fig. 3.10
Pseudo second order for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
163
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 5 10 15 20
t1/2
qt
Fig. 3.11
Intraparticle diffusion plot for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II)=100 mg/dm3, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC=400 mg, agitation speed =
150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
164
0
10
20
30
40
50
300 305 310 315 320 325
T K
Am
ou
nt
ad
so
rbe
nt
of
Cd
(II)
, mg
/g
Fig. 3.12
Effect of temperature on amount adsorbed of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II)=420 mg/dm3, Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg,
agitation speed = 150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
165
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0.00305 0.0031 0.00315 0.0032 0.00325 0.0033 0.00335
1/T K
ln K
c
Fig. 3.13
Van't Hoff plots for adsorption of Cd(II) on WASAC
Cd(II) = 420 mg/dm3,Time=240min, pH=6.5, T= 299 ± 2 K, WASAC= 400 mg,
agitation speed = 150 rpm
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
166
References
[1] L. Zheng, Z. Dang, X. Yi, H. Zhang, Equilibrium and kinetic studies of
adsorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution using modified corn stalk, J.
Hazard. Mater. 176 (2010) 650–656.
[2] M. Athar, S. B. Vohora, Heavy Metals and Environment , Wiley Eastern
Ltd., New Age International publishers Ltd., New Delhi, (1995).
[3] K. Kadirvelu, C. Namasivayam, Activated carbon from coconut coirpith as
metal adsorbent: adsorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution, Adv. Environ.
Res. 7 (2003) 471–478.
[4] L. Nouri, O. Hamdaoui, Ultrasonication-assisted sorption of cadmium
from aqueous phase by wheat bran, J. Phys. Chem. A 111 (2007) 8456-
8463
[5] A. F. Tajar, T. Kaghazchi, M. Soleimani Adsorption of cadmium from
aqueous solutions on sulfurized activated carbon prepared from nut shells
J. Hazard. Mater. 165 (2009) 1159–1164.
[6] Cadmium in Drinking-water, WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality,
Edition 3rd, Geneva, Switzerland (2008).
[7] W. Wang, V. Fthenakis, Kinetics study on separation of cadmium from
tellurium in acidic solution media using ion-exchange resins J. Hazard.
Mater. 125 (2005) 80-88.
[8] J. Nakajima, M. Fujinami, K. Oguma, A Novel separation and
preconcentration method for traces manganese, cobalt, zinc and cadmium
using coagulation of colloidal silica, Anal. Sci. 20 (2004) 1733-1736.
[9] S. E. Ghazy, G. A. Mostafa, Separation of cadmium (II), mercury (II),
bismuth (III) and antimony (III) from drinking and river waters by flotation,
Canad. J. Anal. Sci. Spectro. 53 (2008) 28-35.
[10] K. Inagaki, A. Takatsu, A. Uchiumi, A. Nakama, K. Okamoto,
Determination of cadmium in sediment by isotope dilution inductively
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
167
coupled plasma mass spectrometry using a co- precipitation separation
technique, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 16 (2001) 1370–1374.
[11] C. P. Mane, Analytical applications of 2-octylaminopyridine, Ph. D.
Thesis, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India. (2008).
[12] A. M. Urtiaga, A. Alonso, I. Ortiz, J. A. Daoud, S. A. El-Reefy, S. Pérez
de Ortiz, T. Gallego, Comparison of liquid membrane processes for the
removal of cadmium from wet phosphoric acid, J. Memb. Sci. 164 (2000)
229-240.
[13] B. Bansal, r. Mahajan, Md M. Hossain, M. S. Liaw, Application of liquid
membrane to recover cadmium, Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process. 14
(2006) 227-238.
[14] M. A. Awan, I. A. Qazi, I. Khalid, Removal of heavy metals through
adsorption using sand, J. Environ. Sci. 15 (2003) 413-416.
[15] Y.C. Sharma, S.N. Kaul, C.H. Weng, Adsorptive separation of cadmium
from aqueous solutions and wastewaters by riverbed sand, Environ. Pollut.
150 (2007) 251-257.
[16] E. Alemayehu, B. Lennartz, Virgin volcanic rocks: Kinetics and
equilibrium studies for the adsorption of cadmium from water, J. Hazard.
Mater. 169 (2009) 395–401.
[17] L. Pappalardo, F. Jumean, N. Abdo, Removal of Cadmium, Copper, Lead
and Nickel from Aqueous Solution by White, Yellow and Red United Arab
Emirates Sand, Am. J. Environ. Sci. 6 (2010) 41-44.
[18] D. Quintanilla, I. Hierro, M. Fajardo, I. Sierra, Adsorption of cadmium (II)
from aqueous media onto a mesoporous silica chemically modified with 2-
mercaptopyrimidine, J. Mater. Chem. 16 (2006) 1757–1764.
[19] Y. C. Sharma, V. Shrivastava, Adsorption of cadmium from aqueous
solutions by an indigenous clay mineral, Ind. J. Chem. Technol. 13 (2006)
218-221.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
168
[20] Y.C. Sharma, Thermodynamics of removal of cadmium by adsorption on
an indigenous clay, Chem. Eng. J. 145 (2008) 64–68.
[21] I. G. Abid, K. Galai, M. T. Ayadi, Retention of chromium (III) and
cadmium (II) from aqueous solution by illitic clay as a low-cost adsorbent,
Desalination 256 (2010) 190–195.
[22] M. G. da Fonseca, M. M. de Oliveira, L. N.H. Arakaki, Removal of
cadmium, zinc, manganese and chromium cations from aqueous solution
by a clay mineral, J. Hazard. Mater. B137 (2006) 288–292.
[23] C. N. Haas, N. D. Horowitz, Adsorption of cadmium to kaolinite in the
presence of organic material, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 27 (1986) 131-140.
[24] K. O. Adebowale, I. E. Unuabonah, B. I. Olu-Owolabi, The effect of some
operating variables on the adsorption of lead and cadmium ions on
kaolinite clay, J. Hazard. Mater. B134 (2006) 130–139.
[25] E. I. Unuabonah, B. I. Olu-Owolabi, E. I. Fasuyi, K. O. Adebowale,
Modeling of fixed-bed column studies for the adsorption of cadmium onto
novel polymer–clay composite adsorbent, J. Hazard. Mater. 179 (2010)
415–423.
[26] Y. Wang, X. Tang, Y. Chen, L. Zhan, Z. Li, Q. Tang, Adsorption behavior
and mechanism of Cd(II) on loess soil from China, J. Hazard. Mater. 172
(2009) 30–37.
[27] T. Shi, S. Jia, Y. Chen, Y.Wen, C. Du, H. Guo, Z. Wang, Adsorption of
Pb(II), Cr(III), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) onto a vanadium mine tailing from
aqueous solution, J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009) 838–846.
[28] G. R. Porras, J.B. G. Magno, M.P. G. Muñoz, Lead and cadmium
immobilization on calcitic limestone materials, Desalination 262 (2010)
1–10.
[29] M. I. Kandah, Zinc and cadmium adsorption on low-grade phosphate,
Sep. Purif. Technol. 35 (2004) 61–70.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
169
[30] G. Mustafa, B. Singh, R. S. Kookana, Cadmium adsorption and desorption
behaviour on goethite at low equilibrium concentrations: effects of pH
and index cations, Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1325–1333.
[31] K. Rout, M. Mohapatra, B. K. Mohapatra, S. Anand, Pb(II), Cd(II) and
Zn(II) adsorption on low grade manganese ore, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol.
1 (2009) 106-122.
[32] D.B. Singh, D.C. Rupainwar, G. Prasad, K.C. Jayaprakas, Studies on the
Cd(II)/ removal from water by adsorption, J. Hazard. Mater. 60 (1998)
29–40.
[33] A. Sarı, M. Tuzen, Kinetic and equilibrium studies of Pb(II) and Cd(II)
removal from aqueous solution onto colemanite ore waste, Desalination
249 (2009) 260–266.
[34] M. Minceva, L. Markovska, V. Meshko, Removal of Zn2+, Cd2+ And
Pb2+ from binary aqueous solution by natural zeolite and granulated
activated carbon, Maced. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 26 (2007)125–134.
[35] J. T.Bamgbose, S. Adewuyi, O.Bamgbose, A. A.Adetoye, Adsorption
kinetics of cadmium and lead by chitosan, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9 (2010)
2560-2565.
[36] R. Laus, T. G. Costa, B. Szpoganicz, V. T. Favere, Adsorption and
desorption of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions using chitosan crosslinked with
epichlorohydrin-triphosphate as the adsorbent, J. Hazard. Mater. 183 (2010)
233–241.
[37] S. Hasan, A. Krishnaiah, T. K. Ghosh, D. S. Viswanath, Adsorption of
divalent Cadmium (Cd(II)) from aqueous solutions onto chitosan-coated
perlite bads, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 5066-5077.
[38] M. L. Cervera, M. C. Arnal, M. Guardia, Removal of heavy metals by
using adsorption on alumina or chitosan, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 375
(2003) 820–825.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
170
[39] J. C. Ryu, H. K. Jeon, K. S. Park, Adsorption and removal of heavy metals
by chitosan-phthalocyanine complex, J. Chitin Chitosan 9 (2004) 85-88.
[40] M. S. Rodríguez, M. S. Zalba A. L. Debbaudt, E. Agullo, New chitosan–
calcium pectinate pellets and their adsorption capacity, Colloid. Polym.
Sci. 285 (2006) 119–124.
[41] V. Singh, S. Pandey, S.K. Singh, R. Sanghi, Removal of cadmium from
aqueous solutions by adsorption using poly(acrylamide) modified guar
gum–silica nanocomposites, Sep. Purif. Technol. 67 (2009) 251–261.
[42] T.S. Anirudhan, P.G. Radhakrishnan, Kinetic and equilibrium modelling
of Cadmium (II) ions sorption onto polymerized tamarind fruit shell,
Desalination 249 (2009) 1298–1307.
[43] Buhani, Narsito, Nuryono, E. Sri Kunarti, Production of metal ion
imprinted polymer from mercapto–silica through sol–gel process as
selective adsorbent of cadmium, Desalination 251 (2010) 83–89.
[44] K. S. Rao, G. R. Chaudhury, B.K. Mishra, Kinetics and equilibrium
studies for the removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solutions using
Duolite ES 467 resin, Int. J. Miner. Process. (2010) (article in press)
doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2010.08.003.
[45] C.H. Xiong, C.P. Yao, Study on the adsorption of cadmium(II) from
aqueous solution by D152 resin, J. Hazard. Mater. 166 (2009) 815–820.
[46] L. Dong, Z. Zhu, H. Ma, Y. Qiu, J. Zhao, Simultaneous adsorption of lead
and cadmium on MnO2-loaded resin, J. Environ. Sci. 2 (2010) 225–229.
[47] N.V.P.Aguilar, E. M. Sandoval, P. E. D. Flores, J. R. R. Mendez,
Adsorption of cadmium and lead onto oxidized nitrogen-doped multiwall
carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution: equilibrium and kinetics, J.
Nanopart. Res. 12 (2010) 467–480.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
171
[48] Y. H. Li, S. Wang, Z. Luan, J. Ding, C. Xu, D. Wu, A dsorption of
cadmium(II) from aqueous solution by surface oxidized carbon nanotubes,
Carbon 41 (2003) 1057–1062.
[49] G. D. Vukovic, A. D. Marinkovic, M. Colic, M. Ð. Ristic, R. Aleksic, A.
A. P. Grujic, P. S. Uskokovic, Removal of cadmium from aqueous
solutions by oxidized and ethylenediamine-functionalized multi-walled
carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. J. 57 (2010) 238–248.
[50] S. Wang, H. Wu, Review,Environmental-benign utilisation of fly ash as
low-cost adsorbents, J. Hazard. Mater. B136 (2006) 482–501.
[51] V. C. Srivastava, I. D. Mall, I. M. Mishra, Equilibrium modelling of single
and binary adsorption of cadmium and nickel onto bagasse fly ash, Chem.
Eng. J. 117 (2006) 79–91.
[52] V. K. Gupta, C.K. Jain, I. Ali, M. Sharma, V.K. Saini, Removal of
cadmium and nickel from wastewater using bagasse fly ash—a sugar
industry waste, Wat. Res. 37 (2003) 4038–4044.
[53] A. Papandreou, C.J. Stournaras, D. Panias, Copper and cadmium
adsorption on pellets made from fired coal fly ash, J. Hazard. Mater. 148
(2007) 538–547.
[54] A. Bhatnagar, A. K. Minocha, Utilization of industrial waste for cadmium
removal from water and immobilization in cement, Chem. Eng. J. 150
(2009) 145–151.
[55] N. Balkaya, H. Cesur, Adsorption of cadmium from aqueous solution by
phosphogypsum, Chem. Eng. J. 140 (2008) 247–254.
[56] S. Çay, A. Uyanık, A. Özasık, Single and binary component adsorption of
copper(II) andcadmium(II) from aqueous solutions using tea-industry
waste, Sep. Purif. Technol. 38 (2004) 273–280.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
172
[57] L. Ming, X. Xiao L. Lian, Biosorption Of Cadmium(II) From Aqueous
Solutions By Industrial Fungus Rhizopus Cohnii, Nonferrous Met. Soc.
China 20 (2010) 1104–1111.
[58] W. Zheng, X. Li, F. Wang, Q. Yang, P. Dengb, G. Zeng, Adsorption
removal of cadmium and copper from aqueous solution by areca—A food
waste, J. Hazard. Mater. 157 (2008) 490–495.
[59] N. Azouaou, Z. Sadaoui, H. Mokaddem, Removal of cadmium from
aqueous solution by adsorption on vegetable wastes, J. Appl. Sci. 8
(2008) 4638-4643.
[60] A.B. P. Marın, V. M. Zapata, J.F. Ortuno, M. Aguilar, J. Saez, M. Llorens,
Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange
waste J. Hazard. Mater. B139 (2007) 122–131.
[61] X. Li, Y. Tang, X. Cao, D. Lu, F. Luo, W. Shao, Preparation and
evaluation of orange peel cellulose adsorbents for effective removal of
cadmium, zinc, cobalt and nickel, Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem.
Eng. Aspects 317 (2008) 512–521.
[62] X. Li, Y. Tang, Z. Xuan, Y. Liu, F. Luo, Study on the preparation of
orange peel cellulose adsorbents and biosorption of Cd2+ from aqueous
solution, Sep. Purif. Technol. 55 (2007) 69–75.
[63] E. Pehlivan, B.H. Yanık, G. Ahmetli, M. Pehlivan, Equilibrium isotherm
studies for the uptake of cadmium and lead ions onto sugar beet pulp,
Bioresource Technol. 99 (2008) 3520–3527.
[64] R. J.E. Martins, R. Pardo, R. A.R. Boaventur, Cadmium(II) and zinc(II)
adsorption by the aquatic moss Fontinalis antipyretica: effect of
temperature, pH and water hardness, Water Res. 38 (2004) 693-699.
[65] R. Herrero, P. Lodeiro, R. Rojo, A. Ciorba, P. Rodrıguez, M. E. S. de
Vicente, The efficiency of the red alga Mastocarpus stellatus for
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
173
remediation of cadmium pollution, Bioresource Technol. 99 (2008) 4138–
4146.
[66] A. Sarı, M. Tuzen, Biosorption of cadmium(II) from aqueous solution by
red algae (Ceramium virgatum): Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic
studies, J. Hazard. Mater. 157 (2008) 448–454.
[67] J. T. Matheickal, Q. Yu, G. M. Woodburn, Biosorption of cadmium(II)
from aqueous solutions by pre-treated biomass of marine alga durvillaea
potatorum, Wat. Res. 33 (1999) 335-342.
[68] M.D. Mashitah, Y. Y. Azila, S. Bhatia, Biosorption of cadmium (II) ions
by immobilized cells of Pycnoporus sanguineus from aqueous solution,
Bioresource Technol. 99 (2008) 4742–4748.
[69] F. A. A. Al-Rub, M. Kandah, N. Al-Dabaybeh, Competitive Adsorption of
Nickel and Cadmium on Sheep Manure Wastes: Experimental and
Prediction Studies, Sep. Sci. Technol. 38 (2003) 483–497.
[70] X. Zheng, B. Li, B. Zhu, R. Kuang, X. Kuang, B. Xu, M. Ma, Crayfish
carapace micro-powder (CCM): A novel and efficient adsorbent for
heavy metal ion removal from wastewater, Water 2 (2010) 257-272.
[71] A. H. Mahvi, D. Naghipour, F. Vaezi, S. Nazmara, Teawaste as An
Adsorbent for Heavy Metal Removal from Industrial Wastewaters,
Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2 (2005) 372-375.
[72] L. Cui, G. Wu, T. Jeong, adsorption performance of nickel and cadmium
ions onto brewer’s yeast, The Can. J. Chem. Eng. 88 (2010) 109-115.
[73] U. Garg, M.P. Kaur, G.K. Jawa, D. Sud, V.K. Garg Removal of cadmium
(II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass, J.
Hazard. Mater. 154 (2008) 1149–1157.
[74] N.V. Farinella, G.D. Matos, E.L. Lehmann, M.A.Z. Arruda, Grape
bagasse as an alternative natural adsorbent of cadmium and lead for
effluent treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 154 (2008) 1007–1012.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
174
[75] Y. Hoa, A. E. Ofomaja, Biosorption thermodynamics of cadmium on
coconut copra meal as biosorbent, Biochem. Eng. J. 30 (2006) 117–123.
[76] G.C. Panda, S.K. Das, S. Chatterjee, P.B. Maity, T.S. Bandopadhyay, A.K.
Guhaa, Adsorption of cadmium on husk of Lathyrus sativus: Physico-
chemical study, Colloid Surfaces B 50 (2006) 49–54.
[77] J. Shen, Z. Duvnjak, Adsorption kinetics of cupric and cadmium ions
on corncob particles, Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 3446–3454.
[78] R. L. Ramos, L.A. B. Jacome, I. A.Rodriguez, Adsorption of cadmium (II)
from aqueous solution on natural and oxidized corncob, Sep. Purif.
Technol. 45 (2005) 41–49.
[79] L. Zheng, Z. Dang, C. Zhu, X. Yi, H. Zhang, Congqiang Liu, Removal of
cadmium(II) from aqueous solution by corn stalk graft copolymers,
Bioresource Technol. 101 (2010) 5820–5826.
[80] O. Hamdaoui, Removal of cadmium from aqueous medium under
ultrasound assistance using olive leaves as sorbent, Chem. Eng. Proc. 48
(2009) 1157–1166.
[81] S. Doyurum, A. Celik, Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions
by olive cake, J. Hazard. Mater. B138 (2006) 22–28.
[82] Z. A. Al-Anber, M. A. D. Matouq, Batch adsorption of cadmium ions
from aqueous solution by means of olive cake, J. Hazard. Mater. 151
(2008) 194–201.
[83] Z. Elouear, J. Bouzid, N. Boujelben, M. Feki, A. Montiel, The use of
exhausted olive cake ash (EOCA) as a low cost adsorbent for the removal
of toxic metal ions from aqueous solutions, Fuel 87 (2008) 2582–2589.
[84] I. Kula, M. Ugurlu, H. Karaoglu, A. Celik, Adsorption of Cd (II) ions from
aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from olive stone by
ZnCl2 activation, Bioresource Technol. 99 (2008) 492–501.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
175
[85] P. S. Kumar, K. Ramakrishnan, S. D. Kirupha, S. Sivanesan,
Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of cadmium adsorption from aqueous
solution onto rice husk, Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 27 (2010) 347 – 355.
[86] U. Kumar, M. Bandyopadhyay, Sorption of cadmium from aqueous
solution using pretreated rice husk, Bioresource Technol. 97 (2006)
104–109.
[87] V. C. Srivastava, I. D. Mall, I. M. Mishra, Characterization of mesoporous
rice husk ash (RHA) and adsorption kinetics of metal ions from aqueous
solution onto RHA, J. Hazard. Mater. B134 (2006) 257–267.
[88] K.K. Singh, A.K. Singh, S.H. Hasan, Low cost bio-sorbent ‘wheat bran’
for the removal of cadmium from wastewater: Kinetic and equilibrium
studies, Bioresource Technol. 97 (2006) 994–1001.
[89] L. Nouri, I. Ghodbane, O. Hamdaoui, M. Chiha, Batch sorption dynamics
and equilibrium for the removal of cadmium ions from aqueous phase
using wheat bran, J. Hazard. Mater. 149 (2007) 115–125.
[90] A. Ozer, H.B. Pirincci, The adsorption of Cd(II) ions on sulphuric acid-
treated wheat bran, J. Hazard. Mater. B137 (2006) 849–855.
[91] E. W. Shin, K.G. Karthikeyan, M. A. Tshabalala, Adsorption mechanism
of cadmium on juniper bark and wood, Bioresource Technol. 98 (2007)
588–594.
[92] C. M. Zvinowanda, J. O. Okonkwo, P. N. Shabalala, N. M. Agyei, A novel
adsorbent for heavy metal remediation in aqueous Environments, Int. J.
Environ. Sci. Tech. 6 (2009) 425-434.
[93] T. K. Sen, M. Mohammod, S. Maitra, B. K. Dutta, Removal of Cadmium
from aqueous solution using castor seed hull: A kinetic and equilibrium
study, Clean – Soil, Air, Water 38 (2010) 850–858.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
176
[94] A.H. Mahvi, F. Gholami, S. Nazmara, Cadmium biosorption from
wastewater by ulmus leaves and their ash, Europ. J. Sci. Res. 23 (2008)
197-203.
[95] A. Sharma, K. G. Bhattacharyya, Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf powder
as a biosorbent for removal of Cd(II) from aqueous medium, J. Hazard.
Mater. B125 (2005) 102–112.
[96] T. K. Naiya, P. Chowdhury, A. K. Bhattacharya, S. K. Das, Saw dust and
neem bark as low-cost natural biosorbent for adsorptive removal of Zn(II)
and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solutions, Chem. Eng. J. 148 (2009) 68–79.
[97] B. Yasemin, T. Zek, Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by
sawdust adsorption, J. Environ. Sci. 19 (2007) 160-166.
[98] K. K.H. Choy, G. McKay, Sorption of cadmium, copper, and zinc ions
onto bone char using Crank diffusion model, Chemosphere 60 (2005)
1141–1150.
[99] B. S. Inbaraj, N. Sulochana, Carbonised jackfruit peel as an adsorbent
for the removal of Cd(II) from aqueous solution, Bioresource Technol.
94 (2004) 49–52.
[100] N. Kannan, T. Veemaraj, Batch adsorption dynamics and equilibrium
studies forthe removal of cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solution using
jack fruit seed and commercial activated carbons – a comparative study,
EJEAFChe. 9 (2010) 327-336.
[101] M. Kazemipour, M. Ansari, S. Tajrobehkar, M. Majdzadeh, H. R.
Kermani, Removal of lead, cadmium, zinc, and copper from industrial
wastewater by carbon developed from walnut, hazelnut, almond,
pistachio shell, and apricot stone, J. Hazard. Mater. 150 (2008) 322–327.
[102] M. M. Rao, A. Ramesh, G. P. C. Rao, K. Seshaiah, Removal of copper
and cadmium from the aqueous solutions by activated carbon derived
from Ceiba pentandra hulls, J. Hazard. Mater. B129 (2006) 123–129.
Chapter 3
REMOVAL OF DYES AND HEAVY TOXIC METALS WITH ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE USING LOW COST
ADSORBENTS
177
[103] L. C. Guerrero, R. R. Mendez, E. M. Sandoval, D. A. Cullen, D. J. Smith,
H. Terrones, M. Terrones, Production and detailed characterization of
bean husk-based carbon: Efficient cadmium (II) removal from aqueous
solutions, Wat. Res. 42 (2008) 3473 – 3479.
[104] F. Y. Wang, H. Wang, J. W. Ma, Adsorption of cadmium (II) ions from
aqueous solution by a new low-cost adsorbent—Bamboo charcoal
adsorption of cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solution by a new low-cost
adsorbent—Bamboo charcoal, J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (2010) 300–306.
[105] S. Tangjuank, N. Insuk, J. Tontrakoon, V. Udeye, Adsorption of
Lead (II) and Cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on
activated carbon prepared from cashew nut shells, World Acad. Sci. Eng.
Technol. 52 (2009) 110-116.
[106] M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, E. Senturk, M. Ince, Adsorption of heavy metal
ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from apricot
stone, Bioresource Technol. 96 (2005) 1518–1521.
[107] J. Goel, K. Kadirvelu, C. Rajagopal, V. K. Garg, Cadmium(II) uptake
from aqueous solution by adsorption onto carbon aerogel using a
response surface methodological approach, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
45(2006) 6531-6537.
[108] R. C. Bansal, M. Goyal, Activated Carbon Adsorption, CRC Press,
Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton (2005) 345.
[109] B. J. Suder, J.P. Wightman, Adsorption from solution, Proceeding of a
symposium, Bristol, (1982), Academic press, Londaon, (1983) 235.