kick off meeting
DESCRIPTION
Kick Off Meeting. Toledo 29th April 2005. Agenda 28/04/2005. 17:30 Presentation on proposal for Detailed Plan for the first eight months period. 18:00 Discussion and agreement on workplan. 19:30 Closure. Agenda 29/04/05. 9:00 Welcome and presentation of all participants (2 min each) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Slide 2
Agenda 28/04/2005
17:30 Presentation on proposal for Detailed Plan for the first eight months period.
18:00 Discussion and agreement on workplan.
19:30 Closure.
Slide 3
Agenda 29/04/059:00 Welcome and presentation of all participants (2 min each)9:30 Presentation/discussion of Draft workplan (INNOPOLE).11:30 Coffee Break12:00 Detailed Plan for the first eight months period. Discussion, definition of individual
tasks and responsibilities.– WP1 - Establish Network - information exchange platform– WP2 - Data collect. & Analysis of Regional, National RTD strategies. – WP3 - Create Consensus on Regional Strategies for Collaborative Working in Agrifood networked
businesses.– WP4 - Dissemination & Networking– WP5 - Project Management & Coordination
14:00 Lunch15:30 Detailed Plan for the first eight months period (continued)16:30 Additional Issues (Financial issues, Contractual issues, Coordination to other
Roadmap projects, EOI monitoring, VI Framework Programme Issues, etc) 17:30 Wrap-up. Conclusions. Definition of date & place for the next meeting.18:00 Closure.
Slide 4
Kick Off Meeting
Slide 5
P E
Slide 6
Project ObjectivesAnnex I
1. Design and refine a proposal for RTD roadmap through shared knowledge, policy consensus and peer validation workshops.
2. Generate a sensible implementation model agreed by a number of EU regions/Nations to perform, in 5 years, the selected research activities in support including potential ERA Pilot joint activities to be implemented by a group of regions/nations in a short term.
3. Design, implement and run a sustainable network as a collaboration platform to implement future activities
4. Facilitate coordination and exchange of knowledge of actual RTD work performed in the domain subject to the project in different projects AMI@Netfood intends to cooperate with.
P E
Slide 7
Project ObjectivesObjective 1 & 2
1. Design and refine a proposal for RTD roadmap (SRA) through shared knowledge, policy consensus and peer validation workshops.
• Define ONE proposal for RTD roadmap (SRA) agreed by minimum 10 EU national or regional Policy Makers.
• Develop at least 14 validation/awareness workshops.
2. Generate a sensible implementation model including potential ERA Pilot joint activities to be implemented by a group of regions/nations.
• One proposal for a Technology Platform or Integrated Project agreed by at least 7-8 EU nations/regions (call 5 or 7th FP).
• Propose FIVE different potential joint activities (ERA Pilots).
P E
Slide 8
Project ObjectivesObjective 3 & 4
3. Design, implement and run a sustainable collaboration network.
• Design and run a knowledge exchange platform grouping at least: 40 RTD partners, 100 Industrial partners and 25 Policy Makers from at least 14 regions/nations.
4. Facilitate coordination and exchange of knowledge with other projects AMI@Netfood intends to cooperate with.
• Establish Active Cooperation Channels with at least FIVE related EU projects.
• Dissemination, THREE newsletters to at least 750 & Participate in THREE International workshops.
P E
Slide 9
The AMI@NetfoodDomain Keywords
• Information Society Technologies• AMI technologies• Applications and services for collaborative working
Applicable to AGRIFOOD and RURAL DEVELOPMENT.
P E
Slide 10
OUR Objective
• To define a strategy to develop a sectoral approach for future EU/Regional/National RTD Policy in the area of ICTs applicable to Agrifood and Rural development
• To implement it in a form of a more ambitious project as IP (call 5) or ETP.
• HOW1. Produce EXCELLENT project results (SRA, Era PILOT).2. Make EU commission and EU constituency aware of such results (actively
disseminate).3. Demonstrate EC that we have the potential and capacity to lead the task.Thus Create a strong public-private constituency supporting the results.1. Extend the consortium with all necessary actors that will add value to the IP.2. Prepare a sound proposal for an IP.
P E
Slide 11
How to do this?
First task is to achieve all stated Technical objectives (deliverables) in time, quality, cost (NO SECOND CHANCE). The tasks to be developed are simple but all have to be developed on time and with high quality.
To be proactive demonstrating that our project has succeeded in the task and has sound knowledge on the issue.
Achieve a big constituency (Public Governments & Private Key Players)
P E
Slide 12
Give evidence of IP management capabilities.
All partners will have to work in the same direction. All same objectives.
We should not admit any deviation – neither on deadlines, nor on task performance. The ones that do not provide the minimum required quality and effort might be out of the project.
P E
How to do this?
Slide 13
Extend the consortium with all necessary actors that will add value to the IP.
AMI@netfood will receive quite a high number of interested parties (in fact a number of them have already approached us).
We will have to first consolidate a strong Core Group and after that extend the consortium with VALUABLE PARTNERS (not any partner).
Prepare a sound proposal for an IP. Start as soon as possible, using results and feedback adapting our views to updated EC requirements (5th Call for proposals under 6th FP)
P E
How to do this?
Slide 14
Finally
P E
We are all in the same boat. Competition will be very high but we have an excellent competitive position.
We need to work together in one and only one direction not accepting any deviation.
SRA
Integrated Project Call 5
ETP
Slide 15
The project
P E
Work package
WP WP title Leader MM Start End Deliv
WP1 Establish Network - information exchange platform
INNOPOLE 22 M1 M5 D1.1, D1.2, D1.3
WP2 Data collect. & Analysis of Regional, National RTD strategies. Tech. Independent
ATB 22 M3 M12 D2.1, D2.2
WP3 Create Consensus on Regional Strategies for Collaborative Working in Agrifood networked businesses.
NYHERJI 31,8 M6 M12 D3.1, D3.2, D3.3
WP4 Dissemination & Networking INNOPOLE 36,6 M1 M15 D4.1, D4.2.1-2
D4.3
WP5 Project Management & Coordination INNOPOLE 6,5 M1 M15 D5.1, D5.2.1-2
D5.3, D5.4. D5.5
Slide 16
Work plan
P E
MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
1st April 2005
Slide 17
Deliverables (I)
P E
Deliverables
D Deliverable Title Date Lead Partic. MM
D1.1 Database of Regional/National RTD Policy makers of the ICT & Agri-food domain and list of network nodes from RTD projects
M3 INNOPOLE 7
D1.2 Information exchange model design M3 ATB 7,5
D1.3 Questionnaires and web based questionnaires and description of on-the-field activities.
M5 WIRELESS 8,5
D2.1 Identification of RTD strategies in the target regions and data validation
M9 ATB 12
D2.2 Inventory of identified constrains by sector (EU, relevant, current and future legal, regulatory and standards)
M12 ATB 9
Slide 18
Deliverables (II)
P E
Deliverables
D Deliverable Title Date Lead Partic. MM
D3.1 Common basis Policy making for introduction of innovative approaches of Collab. working in Agrifood (Draft roadmap)
M10 NYHERJI 12
D3.2 Consensus report resulting from Roadmap validation process & Common policy statement
M13 CIMRU 12,8
D3.3 Rough proposal for TP for the 7th FP M13 INNOPOLE 7
D4.1 Dissemination & Networking strategy M3 INNOPOLE 6
D4.2.1 Dissemination & Networking plan as the first version of the PUDK. Impact indicators. List of proposal for Joint Activities
M3 INNOPOLE 9
D4.2.2 Final version of PUDK and dissemination evaluation report M15 INNOPOLE 9
D4.3 Dissemination material M3-M15 INNOPOLE 16,6
Slide 19
Deliverables (III)
P E
Deliverables
D Deliverable Title Date Lead Partic. MM
D5.1 Self assessment procedures and indicators M3 ATB 1
D5.2.1-2 6, 12 Month progress reports M6, M12 INNOPOLE 3
D5.3 Project presentation M6 INNOPOLE 1
D5.4 Final report for publications M15 INNOPOLE 1
Slide 20
P E
Slide 21 P E
WP1 - Objectives
• WP responsible: INNOPOLE
• Partners Involved: ALL.
• Define what is the common understanding of the domain for different participants in the design of RTD policies in different EU countries and regions.
• Identify, contact and select the adequate Organizations and representatives responsible for the design of RTD policies at each target Region/Country.
• Design information exchange model and tools adequate to the potential network members who will in a medium term support network sustainability
Slide 22 P E
WP1 - Workpackage planning
• T1.1 Review agri-food & ICT domain key players in EU regions/nations. INNOPOLE
• T1.2 Define and design information exchange models and tools. ATB
• T1.3 Evaluate and select network nodes from FP5 roadmaps and FP6 running projects and ERA pilots. DEMOCENTRE
• T1.4 Design of data collection methodology. CIMRU
• T1.5 Questionnaire design for distribution, web based questionnaire design. WIRELESSINFO
• T1.6 Definition of on the field activities. INNOPOLE
Slide 23
Workplan
P E
MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5
WP1
T1.1 D1.1
T1.2 D1.2
T1.3
T1.4
T1.5
T1.6
D1.3
Slide 24
WP1 – Actions(INNOPOLE)
List of proposed actions Task 1.1
Review agri-food & ICT domain key players in EU regions/nations
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.1-1 Proposal on DB structure (see AFORO & P2P + change Activity Type)
INNOPOLE ALL 06-05-’05
T1.1-2 Proposal sectoral division of Agri-food / Rural domain.
INNOPOLE ALL 06-05-’05
T1.1-3 Proposal of organisations at each country (and more) (in coordination with T4.1)*
ALL INNOPOLE 15-05-’05
T1.1-4 Feedback on DB structure & sectoral ALL INNOPOLE 15-05-’05
T1.1-5 Definitive DB, sectoral division and Organisations.
INNOPOLE ALL 20-05-’05
P E
Slide 25
Organizations in DB
• Project partners will identify at each participating country (and some additional ones) key representatives belonging to Organizations with responsibility in the design of RTD policies, contact them and contribute to the creation of a database of who is who in the EU.
• In total 40 RTD partners, 100 Industrial partners and 25 Policy Makers from at least 14 regions/nations.
• All partners propose: 10-20 Industry (big), 5-10 RTD, 5-10 Policy Makers. Domain is Agri-food, ICT & Rural.
Slide 26
WP1 - Actions
• T.1.2. Define and Design Information Exchange Models and Tools– Portal:
• Repository for Data Collection and Analysis (re-use of AFORO Repository)
• Collaborative Environment (TWIKI Tool)
• This task will be developed in paralell with T1.4 (CIMRU), T1.5 (WIRELESSINFO) and WP3 (DEMOCENTER).
Slide 27
Approach: Collection of information – the data
repository
Slide 28
Approach: Collection of information – the data
repository
Slide 29
Approach: Collection of information – webpage
example
Slide 30
Approach: Analysis of information – webpage
example
Slide 31
WP1 – Actions(ATB)
List of propossed actions Task 1.2
Define and design information exchange models and tools
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.2-1 Propose model and tools for information exchange – draft of D.1.2
ATB ALL 06.05.05.
T1.2-2 Feedback on proposal ALL ATB 10.05.05
T1.2-3 Establishment of repository at Internet; provisions of other tools for collaborative work (draft version)
ATB ALL 10.06.05
T1.2-4 Testing and feedback ALL ATB 17.06.05
T1.2-5 Final version of tools- Deliverable D.1.2
ATB ALL - CEC 24.06.05
P E
Slide 32
WP1 – ActionsDEMOCENTER
List of propossed actions Task 1.3:Evaluate and select network nodes from FP5 roadmaps and FP6 running projects and ERA pilots
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.3-1 Draft Schema for information collection DemoCenter ALL 06-05-’05
T1.3-2 Preliminary list of project names DemoCenter ALL 13-05-’05
T1.3-3 Additional project names ALL DemoCenter 20-05-’05
T1.4-4 Feedback on Schema ALL DemoCenter 20-05-’05
T1.4-5 Definitive Schema DemoCenter (and Innopole) ALL 27-05-’05
T1.5-6 Complete list of project names and related partner (the list of course can be updated with additional projects)
DemoCenter (and Innopole) ALL 27-05-’05
T1.5-7 For each project the related partner fill in the Schema
ALL DemoCenter ???
Slide 33
WP1 – Actions(CIMRU)
List of propossed actions Task 1.4
Design data collection methodology
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.4-1 Design a questionnaire template for collection of AS-IS situation (current practice, technology implementation review, regulation standards)
CIMRU ALL 20-06-05’
T1.4-2 Design a questionnaire template for collection of TO-BE situation (vision)
CIMRU ALL 27-06-05’
T1.4-3 Feedback on AS-IS questionnaire ALL CIMRU 04-07-05’
T1.4-4 Feedback on TO-BE questionnaire ALL CIMRU 11-07-05’
T1.4-4 Distribute questionnaires CIMRU ALL 20-07-05’
P E
Slide 34
WP1 – Actions(WIRELESS)
List of proposed actions Task 1.5
Questionnaire design for distribution, web based questionnaire No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.5-1
T1.5-2
T1.5-3
T1.5-4
T1.5-5
P E
Slide 35
WP1 - Actions
List of proposed actions Task 1.6
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T1.6-1 Draft Proposal on information collection and validation, on the field actions.
INNOPOLE ALL 20-06-’05
T1.6-2 Feedback on proposal ALL INNOPOLE 27-06-’05
T1.6-3 On-the field action plan (input to D1.3)
INNOPOLE ALL 08-07-’05
P E
Slide 36
Kick Off Meeting
Slide 37
WP2 - Objectives
WP Responsible: ATBPartners involved: All • Objectives:
– to identify the potential demand of additional Research and development activities on ICT technologies and collaborative tools that will lead to the incorporation of AMI technologies into industries and organisations belonging to the extended Agri-food / Rural sector.
– collecting data, information and knowledge, related to agri-food sector, from previous RTD activities and programmes and collecting the needs according to different agri-food / Rural sectors.
Slide 38
WP2 - Objectives
• Objectives:
– structuring the data within the repository which enables multiple layers of analysis, allowing for the development of multiple versions of current states and multiple future visions.
– analysing and synthesising the collected data from actual regional or national RTD strategies with the first hand experiences of the policy makers as identified in WP1 to give a clear expression of the AS-IS and TO-BE states.
– identifying current and future legal constraints
Slide 39
Methodology
CollaborativeEnvironment
WP1
Technology Visions - Questionnaries (WP1)
Knowledge Acquisition (WP2)
Model Storage (WP2)
Model Discussion & Consensus (WP3)
Risk Analysis (WP3)
Roadmap – Consolidated PolicyStrategy Statement
Slide 40
WP2 - Workpackage planning
Tasks:
T2.1 Collect, collate and synthesise information by country/region
T2.2 Identify the current and future legal, regulatory and standards constraints including food safety issues.
Slide 41
WP2 - Workpackage planning
MONTHS3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
WP2
T2.1 D2.1
T2.1 D2.2
Slide 42
WP2 - Workpackage planning
Deliverables
D2.1 Month 9: Identification of RTD strategies in the target regions and data validation
D2.2 Month 12: Inventory of identified constraints by sector (EU relevant, current and future legal, regulatory and standards)
Slide 43
WP2 - ActionsList of proposed actions Task 2.1
Collect, Collate and Synthesize Information by Coutry/region
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T2.1-1 Template for Collection of Information on running and recently completed projects related to AMI@NETFOOD (Agrifood Industry and NEW METHODS OF WORK)
DEMO-CENTER
ALL 07.06.05
T2.1-2 Partners fill-in templates on projects (agreed under task 1.3)
ALL ATB 27.06.05.
T2.1-3 Preparation of AMI@Netfood repository (based on AFORO - adapted to the objectives of AMI@Netfood)
ATB ALL 31.08.05.
T2.1-4 Collection of policy requirements based on questionnaire (Task 1.5) – Each partner at least 10-20 organisations
ALL ATB 30.09.05.
Slide 44
WP2 - ActionsList of proposed actions Task 2.1
Collect, Collate and Synthesize Information by Coutry/region
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T2.1-5 (Re-)Structuring of filled-in questionnaires into data-base (parallel to Task 2.1.-4)- iterations
ATB ALL 14.10.05.
T2.1-6 Proposed structure/template of the deliverable D.2.1. ATB ALL 27.06.05
T2.1-7 Feedback on template ALL ATB 04.07.05
T2.1-8 First draft version of D.2.1. ATB ALL 28.10.05
T2.1-9 Feedback ALL ATB 11.11.05
T2.1-10 Final Version of D2.1 ATB ALL 25.11.05
Slide 45
WP2 - ActionsList of proposed actions Task 2.2
Identify the current and future legal, regulatory and standards constraints including food safety issues.
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T2.2-1 Define aspects: govermental, legislative...constraints to be analysed - Template(s) for collection of data
DEMO-CENTER
ALL 07.06.2005?
T2.2-2 Feedback on template(s) for analysis ALL DEMO-CENTER
27.06.2005
T2.2-3 Partners provide information on constraints in their countries and EU (each partner must provide for its country and for EU)
ALL ATB 30.09.2005.
Slide 46
WP2 - ActionsList of proposed actions Task 2.2
Identify the current and future legal, regulatory and standards constraints including food safety issues.
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T2.2-4 Proposed structure/template of the deliverable D.2.2.
ATB ALL 27.06.05
T2.2-5 Feedback on template ALL ATB 04.07.05
T2.2-6 First draft version of D.2.2. ATB ALL 28.10.05
T2.2-7 Feedback ALL ATB 11.11.05
T2.1-8 Final Version of D2.2 ATB ALL 25.11.05
Slide 47
Slide 48
WP3 - Objectives• Objectives:Define a common policy RTD agenda in a form of a coordinated
action Plan To provide a roadmap which reflects the business demands for
Collaborative working and future technologies supported by ambient mobile intelligence for the agrifood industry & Rural domain.RTD Agenda has to - Reflect the needs of the business and its current and future standards and regulations from the perspective of networked businesses- Show future agri-food/Rural needs in comparison with potentially available ICT technologies.
• Responsible: Nýherji
Slide 49
WP3 - Workpackage planning
• T3.1 Identify the key defining parameters for the new collaborative working environments in agrifood.
• T3.2 Design a common basis for policymaking and programme forming
• T3.3 Validate by testing on peers (Workshop)• T3.4 Create consolidated common policy strategy statement • T3.5 Implementation models definition.
• Main milestone – Generation of Common Policy Statement and operational IST technology implementation approaches (M13)
Slide 50
WP3 - Workpackage planning
MONTHS6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
WP3
T3.1
T3.2 D3.1
T3.3 D3.2
T3.4
T3.5 D3.3
Slide 51
WP3 - ActionsList of proposed actions
Identify the key defining parameters for the new collaborative working environments in agrifood
No. Action Responsible Due date
A3.1 Identify key defining parameters WirelessInfo M 8
Slide 52
WP3 - ActionsList of proposed actions
Design a common basis for policymaking and programme forming
No. Action Responsible Due date
A3.2 Draft version of SRA Nýherji M10
Slide 53
WP3 - ActionsList of proposed actions
Validate by testing on peers (Workshop)
No. Action Responsible Due date
A3.3 Agrifood /Rural SRA – Draft1 INESC M15
Slide 54
WP3 - ActionsList of proposed actions
Create consolidated common policy strategy statement
No. Action Responsible Due date
A3.4 Implement models definition
- Rough Implementation plan
INNOPOLE M15
Slide 55
WP3 - ActionsList of proposed actions
Implementation Models Definition
No. Action Responsible Due date
Slide 56
Kick Off Meeting
P E
Slide 57 P E
WP4 - Objectives
• WP responsible: INNOPOLE
• Reinforce the already established agri-food network as a base for future activities. AGRI RURAL CONSTITUENCY
• Disseminate Strategic Research Agenda.
• Strengthen cooperation with other RTD initiatives.
Slide 58 P E
WP4 - Workpackage planning
• T4.1 Dissemination & Networking strategy definition. • T4.2 Dissemination & Networking Action-Plan Design. • T4.3 Design of a set of potential joint activities.• T4.4 Dissemination material preparation.• T4.5 Development of dissemination and networking
activities.• T4.6 Evaluation of results of dissemination and
networking activities
Slide 59
Work plan
P E
MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
WP4
T4.1D4.1
D4.2.1
T4.2
T4.3
T4.4D4.2.2
T4.5
T4.6D4.3 D4.3 D4.3 D4.3 D4.3 D4.3
Slide 60
WP4 – T4.1 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.1
Dissemination & Networking strategy definition
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.1-1 Draft of the D4.1 “Dissemination & Networking strategy” document.
INNOPOLE ALL 15-05-’05
T4.1-2 Feedback on document D4.1 ALL INNOPOLE 28-05-’05
T4.1-3 List of target audience on each country
(in coordination with T1.1)
ALL INNOPOLE 15-05-’05
T4.1-4 Definitive document D4.1 INNOPOLE ALL 15-06-’05
Slide 61
WP4 – T4.2 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.2
Dissemination & Networking action Plan design
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.2-1 Proposal for Dissemination & Networking Action-Plan. Incl. Tools.
INNOPOLE ALL 15-06-’05
T4.2-2 Identification on Target Audience per country.
ALL INNOPOLE 24-06-’05
T4.2-3 Proposal on a set of dissemination assessment indicators.
DEMOCENTER WLSS, CIMRU,
INNOPOLE 24-06-`05
T4.2-4 Draft PUDK, D4.2.1 INNOPOLE ALL 30-06-’05
T4.2-5 Comments on draft PUDK, D4.2.1 ALL INNOPOLE 07-07-’05
T4.2-6 Definitive document D4.2.1 INNOPOLE ALL 15-07-’05
Slide 62
WP4 – T4.3 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.3
Design of a set of potential joint activities
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.3-1 Proposal of ERA pilot potential joint activities
ALL INNOPOLE 15-06-’05
T4.3-2 Collection of proposals, evaluation, and redistribute
INNOPOLE ALL 16-06-’05
T4.3-3 Draft of FIVE ERA pilot joint actions proposal
INNOPOLE ALL 30-06-’05
T4.3-4 Comments on draft ALL INNOPOLE 06-07-’05
T4.3-5 Five Definitive ERA pilot proposals INNOPOLE ALL 11-07-’05
Slide 63
WP4 – T4.4 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.4
Dissemination material preparation
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.4-1 Logo design INNOPOLE ALL 12-04-’05
T4.4-2 Poster preparation INNOPOLE 25-04-’05
T4.4-3 Web page design (ver1.0) to be continuously updated (www.ami-netfood.com already registered)
INNOPOLE 15-05-’05
T4.4-4 Preparation of Project Brochure INNOPOLE 25-05-’05
T4.4-5 Material (paper, …) INNOPOLE 15-05-’05
T4.4-6 Preparation of the newsletters INNOPOLE During the project
T4.4-7 Translation of the common basis to policymaking documents (D3.1) into 14 EU languages
ALL INNOPOLE During the project
Slide 64
WP4 – T4.5 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.5
Development of dissemination and networking activities.
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.5-1 Dissemination planning activities for each country for the following months
ALL INNOPOLE 15-07-’05
T4.5-2 Realization of the dissemination activities
ALL During the project
T4.5-3 Results of the dissemination activities ALL INNOPOLE After each activity
T4.5-4 Draft of the D4.2.2 INNOPOLE ALL 31-05-’06
T4.5-5 Comments on draft of the D4.2.2 ALL INNOPOLE 15-06-’06
T4.5-6 Final version on Draft D4.2.2 INNOPOLE ALL 22-06-’06
Slide 65
WP4 – T4.6 Actions
P E
List of proposed actions Task 4.6
Evaluation of results of dissemination and networking activities
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T4.6-1 Template of questionnaire of satisfaction of dissemination activities
INNOPOLE ALL 15-05-’05
T4.6-2 Questionnaire of satisfaction fulfilled for each activity in each country
ALL INNOPOLE After each activity
T4.6-2 Consolidated document of satisfaction of the dissemination activities
INNOPOLE ALL 15-06-’06
Slide 66
Kick Off Meeting
P E
Slide 67 P E
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan
• WP responsible: INNOPOLE
• Coordinate all the tasks
• T5.1 Define a set of procedures to assess the evolution of project workplan comparing to expected results.
• T5.2 Normal project management procedures (progress report, management reports, review coordination, financial management,…)
Slide 68
Work plan
P E
MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
WP5
T5.1
T5.2
Slide 69
WP5 – Actions(ATB)
List of proposed actions - Task 5.1
Define a set of procedures to assess the evolution of project workplan comparing to expected results
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T5.1-1 Creation of the draft "List of Indicators for self-assessment"
ATB All 09.05.05
T5.1-2 Draft version of the D5.1 - Procedures ATB All 09.05.05
T5.1-3 Comments All ATB 16.05.05
T5.1-4 Final List and Procedure – Self-assessment frequency/Steps
ATB All 23.05.05
Slide 70
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.1
WP Objective Indicator type
Indicator Assess point
Expected Value
Result
WP1 General:
Define the common understanding of the domain ...
Identify, contact and select the adequate Organisations and ...
Design information exchange model and tools ...
Business (B)
S&T (S)
Technical (T)
T1.1 Review agri-food & ICT domain key players in EU regions/nations:
review the multisectoral agri-food domain and division in sectors.
create a hierarchical structure of the a-f domain, and identify the sectors to be.
T1.2 Define & design information exchange models & tools: supporting tool for the exchange of information and consensus
T1.6 Definition of on the field activities.
Define the number and target audience etc).
Deliverables D1.1 Completeness Month 3 Quality " Delivery time " D1.2 Completeness Month 3 Quality " WP2
- Indicators on Consensus Achievement will be of key relevance-
Slide 71
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.1
Procedure for evaluation of the completed list
• Responsible for the List Completion: WP Leader
• Responsible for the List Control: Project Co-ordinator
• Final self assessment report compilation: Project Co-ordinator
• Final self assessment report (s) evaluation: SC (electronically and at the meeting)
• Self-assessment period – each 2 (3) months ?
Slide 72
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.1
List of proposed actions - Task 5.1
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T5.1-5 Completed “Lists” for Month 2 WP Leaders (All)
PC (ATB)
12.06.05
T5.1-6 Draft D5.1 – Including “Lists” as examples ATB All 19.06.05
T5.1-7 Comments All ATB 27.06.05
T5.1-8 Final D5.1 – Completed for Month 2 (3) ATB PC 30.06.05
Slide 73
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.1
List of proposed actions - Task 5.1
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T5.1-9 Draft “Project Quality Plan” ATB All 05.06.05
T5.1-10 Comments All ATB 12.06.05
T5.1-11 Final PQP – Within Final D5.1 ATB PC 30.06.05
Slide 74
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.2
List of proposed actions - Task 5.2
Project management procedures
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T5.2-1 Draft Minutes on KoM INNOPOLE All 06.05.05
T5.2-2 Comments on KoM minutes ALL INNOPOLE 13.05.05
T5.2-3 Final KoM minutes INNOPOLE ALL & EC 17.05.05
T5.2-4 Material for 6 months Progress report (resources, dissemination actions, other related activities, etc)
All INNOPOLE 12.09.05
T5.2-5 Draft 6 months Progress report INNOPOLE ALL 19.09.05
T5.2-6 Comments ALL INNOPOLE 23.09.05
Slide 75
WP5 – Objectives and Workplan – T5.2
List of proposed actions - Task 5.2
Project management procedures
No. Action Responsible To Due date
T5.2-7 Final 6 months Progress report INNOPOLE All & EC 30.09.05
Similar action for 12 months Progress Report and review meeting documentation.
Schedule will depend on review meeting dates to be agreed with EC.
Month 6 – Project Presentation
Month 15 – Final report and final public report
Slide 76 P E
Review process
• Review Meeting in Month 3-4, on site, place to be decided (reduced number of partners).
• Intermediate review meeting in Brussels.
• Final one on site (big dissemination event).
Slide 77 P E
Management Issues
VERY IMPORTANT
Project Manager and WP Managers will define deadlines to fulfil specific tasks…. There is nothing worse that spent the whole project chasing partners to answer on time.
We all should try our best to keep deadlines.
The project is simple … let us not to make it difficult.
Slide 78
Kick Off Meeting
P E
Slide 79 P E
The Contract
• Contract will be signed by EC as soon as ALL ACCESSION FORMS are provided to EC.
• Project Duration 15 months.• All rights and duties are documented in both Contract
and Consortium agreement.
Slide 80 P E
Payments
• Only one Project Period, i.e. only one cost reporting period (Final Cost Statement at the end).
• All partners will have to submit one audit certificate (at the end).
• All partners keep track on all costs (labour with record, services with invoices)
• Advanced 68% payment will be received within 40 days after contract signature.
• Bank Guarantee amounting 517.000 EURO has been submitted by INNOPOLE (cost will be shared).
Slide 81
Budget
PartnerCost
ModelPerson Months
Personnel Costs
Non-Personnel Costs
Overall Budget
Requested EC
Contribution
0,68940135
Incl OVHsAdv.
Payment
INNOPOLEFC 20,8 119.772,00
13.030,00 132.802,00 114.516,00 78.947,48
ATB FC 15,5 156.810,00 6.000,00 162.810,00 109.140,00 75.241,26
CIMRU AC 10,6 77.120,00 4.950,00 82.070,00 82.070,00 56.579,17
Nyherji FC 12,3 134.240,00 4.950,00 139.190,00 94.310,00 65.017,44
DemoCenter FC 14,5 89.075,00 4.950,00 94.025,00 66.650,00 45.948,60
CATT FC 3,4 32.272,00 3.500,00 35.772,00 28.380,00 19.565,21
WirelessInfo FCF 10,5 57.500,00 4.950,00 62.450,00 62.450,00 43.053,11
ARA FCF 5,1 16.818,00 5.000,00 21.818,00 21.818,00 15.041,36
UTA AC 3 22.000,00 2.950,00 24.950,00 24.950,00 17.200,56
CYBELIA FC 3 22.000,00 2.950,00 24.950,00 24.950,00 17.200,56
EXODUS FC 3,4 26.139,80 2.950,00 29.089,80 22.322,00 15.388,82
Uni. Rzeszow AC 3,4 16.720,00 2.950,00 19.670,00 19.670,00 13.560,52
INESC P FC 10 83.120,00 4.950,00 88.070,00 59.030,00 40.695,36
HAAI AC 3,4 16.720,00 2.950,00 19.670,00 19.670,00 13.560,52
Total: 118,9870.306,8
067.03
0937.336
,80 749.926 517.000,00
Slide 82 P E
Coordination with other Projects
• A number of EC initiatives are of key relevance for AMI@netfood
• CISTRANA project and ERA Pilot CAs (a coordination meeting already in February with participation of all Era Pilots, Incl. AMI@netfood)
• ABARD• MOSAIC• Brain Bridges
• Specific collaboration links will have to be set-up.
Slide 83 P E
IP, ETP monitoring
• In parallel we should monitor status of development of actual and future IP projects and ETPs.
• There is an opportunity to create a basis for a sectoral activity under 7th FP.
Slide 84
Coordination with other Projects
Slide 85
COMIST Project The COMIST project aims to increase the participation of NMAS
organisations in IST activities according to a systemic innovation approach. COMIST supports and implements a general collaboration and interaction environment through the instrument of virtual or networked communities already experimented with success within the AMI@work.
• The general COMIST project focus is on strengthening the NMAS innovation system in the area of New Work and Business Environments and building strong integrative networking relations with IST.
• The working method of the COMIST project is explicitly inspired to that experimented by the MOSAIC project in the constitution, launch and operation of the AMI@Work family of communities. These communities act as breeding grounds for innovation in bringing together the relevant organisations and stakeholders for the purpose of starting up "innovation cycles". COMIST primary focus is on NMAS SMEs in the manufacturing, agro-food and logistics sectors.
Slide 86 P E
Coordination with other Projects
• COMIST –T1.2• Sectoral deployment strategies for systemic and collaborative innovation• D1.2.1 Develop baseline document• • Define, for each NMAS country, key value chain and sector characteristics,
bottlenecks and challenges in each of the sectoral areas (manufacturing, logistics, agro-food), as far as related to IST (e-work and e-business)
• • Define the IST-based value creation clusters related to the sectors as mentioned, of high potential importance from NMAS perspective and relating to other EU member states clusters.
• • Provide background analysis (must be related to e-work and e-business). • • Assess strengths and weaknesses of NMAS in these clusters. Feed into T1.1• • Identify promising or emerging IST-based clusters NMAS + others • Interior Deadline: 30 April 2005 or 30 May 2005
Slide 87
European Policy, Research Proposals and Communities Linkage Day,Thursday, 19th May, Budapest, BUTEhttp://www.mosaic-network.org/news/events/050519-SpringEvent.html
'Linkage Day - Parallel Sessions'http://www.mosaic-network.org/bscw/bscw.cgi/0/105519
Draft Programme • 09.00 – 09.30 Registration • 09.30 – 09.40 Opening Dr. Etele Baráth, Minister for European Affairs, Hungary • 09.40 – 10.00 A LivingLabs Network for Human-centric Systemic Innovation – • a common innovation platform for global competitiveness of Europe • József Veress, Political state secretary, Prime Minister’s Office, Hungary• 10.00 – 10.30 Collaborative Working Environments - Linking European Policy and Research• Bror Salmelin, Head of Unit, New Working Environments• European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate-General • 10.30 – 11.00 Coffee Break • 11.00 – 11.15 Cross-fertilisation between the European Technology Platforms and advanced AMI applications• José M. Cavanillas, International Activities Director, Atos Origin sae• 11.15 – 11.30 Mobile Individual, mWork and a LivingLabs Network - Systemic Innovation validated by users• Veli-Pekka Niitamo, Director of Mobile Work Research, Nokia Corporation• 11.30 – 11.45 AMI Communities towards i2010• Roberto Santoro, President, European Society of Concurrent Engineering ESoCE NET• Chair, AMI@Work family of communities• 11.45 – 12.30 Discussion• 12.30 – 13.30 Lunch• 13.30 – 18.30 Open proposals / communities sessions • See here the parallel sessions programme for 6 tracks of 3 parallel sessions each
• 18.30 – 19.30 Closing session Moderator: Olavi Luotonen, Scientific Officer, European Commission Information Society and
Media Directorate-General New Working Environments • 20.00 – 22.30 Networking Dinner
Slide 88 P E
Next meeting date
• …….