keystone xl pipeline project pipeline route variation...

9
KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE: Refinement: Reroute: X Footprint: Design: Centerline: X Pump Station: Valve Site: CAR: 2 LOCATION: Sketch: Pictures: N/A State: SD County: Various Quad Map: Township: Various Range: Various Aerial Map: Section: Various Centerline: 6/11/2013 MP: XXX.X to XXX.X 3 REASON FOR ROUTE VARIATION (Please include reason for route variation): DETAIL ROUTE VARIATION (Please describe route variation in detail): ADDITIONAL IMPACTS (Please include any additional impacts which may affect cost; crossings, induction bends, etc.): 9 10 Originator: Received by: Date: Date: Fax to: ? 11 12 Assigned Tracking Number: Filed by: Date: Fax to: ? 0512-SD-P4-XXX.X-XXX.X-S Attached N/A See attached map sheets KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION FORM This report consists of 4 proposed CL route variations to shift the CL a minimum of 150 ft away from all field survey verified water wells. The primary reason for this route variation is to shift the CL a minimum distance of 150 ft. away from all registered domestic and livestock wells that are currently located within that radius, so as to avoid testing of water wells within 150 ft. of the CL as part of the blasting mitigative measures per the Construction Mitigation and Reclamation Plan (CMRP) under Section 4.7 "Trenching". The route variations are proposed by Engineering based on field verification by civil survey. Listed in "Supplemental Info" Tab. No new landowners have been affected by the proposed route variations. The tracts impacted are as follows: No new landowners are impacted due to these reroutes RV-0512-01: 1 tract impacted: ML-SD-ME-00700.000 – Green Valley Limited Partnership RV-0512-02: 1 tract impacted: ML-SD-ME-01240.000 – Howes Grazing Association, Inc. RV-0512-03: 2 tracts impacted: ML-SD-TR-10150.000 and ML-SD-TR-10170.000 – T.J. Knutson RV-0512-04: 2 tracts impacted: ML-SD-TR-11280.000 – James E. & Katherine M. Cahoy ML-SD-TR-11290.000 – Rory M. Klein, Roderick G. Klein, Hustin D. Klein, Sharon Klein Listed in "Cost Analysis" Tab. Miscellaneous Costs savings include: Well testing/sampling costs ($5,500/field visit, includes costs for mobilization to site+field screening+lab testing+letter report), anticipated a minimum of 2 visits pre-construction to establish baseline and during pipeline operations. Sampling includes: analyses for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH), Gasoline range organics (GRO) and Diesel Range organics (DRO), Well water quality testing for domestic suitability (Fecal Coliform, E-Coli, Nitrate/Nitrite, Hardness, Total dissolved solids (TDS), Total suspended solids). 10/14/2013 10/14/2013 Engineering 0512-SD-P4-XXX.X-XXX.X-S * Evaluation Criteria is located in Route Refinement and Reroute Process, Section 3 FORM 1 Document Control Number: KXL10-00006-01-AA-180 (Form 1)

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT

1

VARIATION TYPE: Refinement: Reroute: X Footprint: Design:

Centerline: X Pump Station: Valve Site: CAR:

2

LOCATION: Sketch: Pictures: N/A

State: SD County: Various Quad Map:

Township: Various Range: Various Aerial Map:

Section: Various Centerline: 6/11/2013 MP: XXX.X to XXX.X

3

REASON FOR ROUTE VARIATION (Please include reason for route variation):

DETAIL ROUTE VARIATION (Please describe route variation in detail):

ADDITIONAL IMPACTS (Please include any additional impacts which may affect cost; crossings, induction bends, etc.):

9 10

Originator: Received by:

Date: Date:Fax to: ?

11 12

Assigned Tracking Number: Filed by:

Date:Fax to: ?

0512-SD

-P4-X

XX

.X-X

XX

.X-S

Attached

N/A

See attached map sheets

KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECTPIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION FORM

This report consists of 4 proposed CL route variations to shift the CL a minimum of 150 ft away from all field survey verified water wells. The primary reason for this route variation is to shift the CL a minimum distance of 150 ft. away from all registered domestic and livestock wells that are currently located within that radius, so as to avoid testing of water wells within 150 ft. of the CL as part of the blasting mitigative measures per the Construction Mitigation and Reclamation Plan (CMRP) under Section 4.7 "Trenching".

The route variations are proposed by Engineering based on field verification by civil survey.

Listed in "Supplemental Info" Tab.

No new landowners have been affected by the proposed route variations. The tracts impacted are as follows:No new landowners are impacted due to these reroutes

RV-0512-01: 1 tract impacted: ML-SD-ME-00700.000 – Green Valley Limited Partnership RV-0512-02: 1 tract impacted: ML-SD-ME-01240.000 – Howes Grazing Association, Inc.

RV-0512-03: 2 tracts impacted: ML-SD-TR-10150.000 and ML-SD-TR-10170.000 – T.J. Knutson

RV-0512-04: 2 tracts impacted:ML-SD-TR-11280.000 – James E. & Katherine M. CahoyML-SD-TR-11290.000 – Rory M. Klein, Roderick G. Klein, Hustin D. Klein, Sharon Klein

Listed in "Cost Analysis" Tab.Miscellaneous Costs savings include: Well testing/sampling costs ($5,500/field visit, includes costs for mobilization to site+field screening+lab testing+letter report), anticipated a minimum of 2 visits pre-construction to establish baseline and during pipeline operations. Sampling includes: analyses for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH), Gasoline range organics (GRO) and Diesel Range organics (DRO), Well water quality testing for domestic suitability (Fecal Coliform, E-Coli, Nitrate/Nitrite, Hardness, Total dissolved solids (TDS), Total suspended solids).

10/14/2013 10/14/2013

Engineering

0512-SD-P4-XXX.X-XXX.X-S

* Evaluation Criteria is located in Route Refinement and Reroute Process, Section 3 FORM 1Document Control Number:

KXL10-00006-01-AA-180 (Form 1)

Page 2: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

Keystone XL Pipeline - Supplemental Information for Route Variation Report 0512Prepared: 2013-10-14

RV ID MP Start MP End State County Section Township RangeOriginal Length

(ft)Reroute Length

(ft)Change in Length (ft)

Max. Perp. Deviation (ft)

Reason for Variation Brief Variation DescriptionAdditional

Impacts/CommentsOriginator

0512-01 406.62 406.96 SD Meade 019 009N 015E 1,800 1,821 20.42 115.10Shift CL to be 150' from existing water well.

The proposed route variation starts near ~MP 406.6 and continues straight at the existing PI for ~474 ft then deviates eastwards to parallel the current centerline for ~372 ft and finally deviates eastwards again for ~976ft to tie back in at ~MP 406.9. Proposed Route Variation shifts Current CL away from water well (The distance is currently 39.34 ft.).

- Well data source was Survey Data. - RV also diminishes the Risk to the pipeline in the event of an unplanned release.

Engineering

0512-02 428.81 429.10 SD Meade 002 006N 017E 1,541 1,549 8.50 46.87Shift CL to be 150' from existing water well.

The proposed route variation starts near ~MP 428.8 and deviates slightly southwest for ~1,374 ft and then deviates back southeast for ~175 ft to tie back in at MP429.1. Proposed Route Variation shifts Current CL away from water well (currently located at a distance of 25.71 ft. from the current CL).

- Well data source was Survey Data. - RV also diminishes the Risk to the pipeline in the event of an unplanned release.

Engineering

0512-03 546.04 546.20 SD Tripp 011 102N 078W 823 860 37.64 117.85Shift CL to be 150' from existing water well.

The proposed route variation starts near ~MP 546.04 and deviates southeast for ~574 ft and then deviates back in the south direction for ~286ft to tie back in at ~MP 546.2. Proposed Route Variation shifts Current CL away from water well (located a distance of 29.71 ft. from the current CL).

- Well data source was Survey Data.- RV also diminishes the Risk to the pipeline in the event of an unplanned release.

Engineering

0512-04 576.76 577.08 SD Tripp 027 098N 076W 1,695 1,836 140.87 268.97Shift CL to be 150' from existing water well.

The proposed route variation starts near MP576.8 and deviates southwest for ~1466ft and then deviates back eastwards to tie back in at ~MP577.078. Proposed Route Variation shifts Current CL away from water well that is located a distance of 22.42 ft. from the current CL. Well data Source was Survey Data. This route variation has been verified by field inspector and civil survey.

- Well data source was Survey Data. - RV also diminishes the Risk to the pipeline in the event of an unplanned release.

Engineering

RV IDCivil Survey Complete?

Civil Survey Needed (ft)

Moves Pump Station?

Moves Valve Site?

In Co-located Area?

Does route variation

impact ABB areas?

Biological Survey

Complete for Existing

Corridor?

Cultural Survey Complete for

Existing Corridor?

Biological Survey

Complete for Proposed Corridor?

Cultural Survey Complete for

Proposed Corridor?

Estimated Length

Requiring new Environmental

Surveys (ft)

Number of New Landowners impacted by reroute

Number of Landowners on current route impacted by reroute

Is the affected landowner a possible condemnation?

Number of tracts

purchased on original route.

Does proposed route variation impact Tribal

Lands?

Does proposed route variation

impact any Federal/State

Lands?

0512-01 YES 0 NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES 0 0 1 NO NO NO

0512-02 YES 0 NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES 0 0 1 NO NO NO

0512-03 YES 0 NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES 0 0 2 NO NO NO

0512-04 YES 0 NO NO NO NO YES YES NO NO 807 0 2 NO NO NO

Page 3: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

Keystone XL Pipeline - Cost Analysis for Route Variation Report 0512Prepared: 2013-10-14

RV IDAdditional length (ft)

Cost $360/ft

Additional length of wetland

construction (ft)

Cost $195/ft

Additional length of side

hill construction (ft)

Cost $19/ft

Additional bore length (ft)

Cost $540/ft

Additional Waterbody crossings

Cost ($77,250/EA btw

10' - 19')($32,500/EA

< 10')

Cost of Environmental

survey($5,300/mile)

Cost of Civil survey

($5,000/mile)

Approximate cost for land purchased on

current centerline

Miscellaneous cost for

additional impacts

Total Cost

0512-01 20.42 7,351.20$ 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ -$ (11,000.00)$ (3,648.80)$

0512-02 8.50 3,060.00$ 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ -$ (11,000.00)$ (7,940.00)$

0512-03 37.64 13,550.40$ 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ -$ (11,000.00)$ 2,550.40$

0512-04 140.87 50,713.20$ 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ 810.13$ -$ (11,000.00)$ 40,523.33$

Overall Estimated Costs of Routes Variations= 31,484.93$

Page 4: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

Key

ston

eX

LP

ipel

ine

-A

ppro

val

form

for

Rou

teV

aria

tion

Rep

ort

0512

Pre

par

ed:

201

3-1

0-1

4

RHID

0512

-el

0512

-02

0512

-03

0512

-04

App

rova

l(Y

IN)

LAN

D(T

rarr

Can

ado)

corr

rron

lvT

ine

App

rova

l(Y

IN)

-

-

oj

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G(T

r000

Con

ada)

Cor

rrro

rrn

°)(/[

Snno

wrr

App

rova

YIN

)V

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G)o

vp(

Cvr

rvev

lvK

nvin

McG

lyrn

Sig

rolo

ro4

((/(//4

)/-

/iy

App

rovo

l(Y

IN)

YV

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

(Tro

rroC

anod

o)co

rrrr

evln

‘So

ndro

BOrn

eOi_

f2SN

rarO

ro

App

rova

l(Y

IN)

FAC

ILIT

IES

(Tre

roC

oned

a)Co

rvrro

rOS

andr

aG

Igov

Iv

Sigr

olur

e

App

rova

lcr

’IN)

PRO

JEC

TM

AN

AG

EMEN

T-MON

TAN

A(T

rons

Cev

ade)

Com

mer

ls

Ale

nLi

elo

Slgr

alvr

e

App

rvva

YIN

)N

.(

—PR

OJE

CT

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

-SOUT

HD

AK

OT

A

(Tra

nsC

onod

a)C

vmrr

ovlS

Jarg

onO

rivr

r

App

rova

l(Y

IN)

PRO

JEC

TM

AN

AG

EMEN

T-NEB

RA

SKA

(Tra

vsC

arad

a)C

omm

enls

Rob

erl

Bra

dley

Sigr

alvr

e

App

rova

l(Y

IN)

KE

YST

ON

EX

LM

AN

AG

ER

(Tra

nsC

ofla

da)

Com

mer

o

Slo

vo

Mar

r

Sign

arvr

e

Page 5: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

I)

CCC

0

>C

0

0

E0

0CC

C

CC

—I

0.

>

>-‘.

tv“

çv

-‘tc’

‘- \-

oc”

,ft,

U

j

I I I I ‘ j I J I I ‘ I i Zft I I II

C

—U r F r r -b

[

Page 6: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

FIELD

PATH MEADE

COUNTYSEC 19

T 9N R 15EML-SD-ME-00700.000

GREEN VALLEYLIMITED PARTNERSHIP

MP 406.8

MP 406.6

MP 406.9

MP 406.7

RV-0512-01

Boyd

BrownCherry

Holt

KeyaPaha Rock

Adams

Butte

Corson DeweyGregory

HaakonHarding

Jackson

Jones

Lyman

Meade Mellette

Perkins

Stanley

Todd

Tripp

Ziebach

NE

MT

SD

exp Energ y Services Inc.t: +1.850.385.5441 | f: +1.850.385.55231300 Metropolitan Blvd.Tallah assee, FL 32308U.S.A.www.exp.com

• BUILDINGS • EAR TH & ENVIR ONMENT • ENER GY • • INDUSTR IAL • INFR ASTR UCTUR E • SUSTAINABILITY •

PREPARED BY:

SHEET:DWG: XL-46-P-9299-A-R V-0512-01

KEYSTONE XL PROJECT

DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:

COUNTY:STATE:

CCPD

RV-0512-01 PROPOSED CL RV

REVISION

PRELIMINARY

DATE

2013-10-09DATE:

REV. NO.:

0 ISSUED FOR R EVIEW 2013-10-09

PROJECTION: NAD83 | UTM13 N

MEADESOUTH DAKOTA

RV-0512-01 PROPOSED ROUTE VARIATION

Keystone XL Project

LEGEND

°

2010 PICTOMETRY/2012 NAIP

°

0 125 25062.5 Feet

! 1/10 Mile Post! Mile Post (2013-06-11)

#*

# * Valve

Valve Site

Keystone XL Project Centerline (2013-06-11)

Route Variation

Access Road - Permanent

Access Road - Temporary

Workspace

Cultural Site

Pump Station

Property Parcels

Section Line

County Line

Current Waterbody

Current Wetland

1

Page 7: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

Boyd

BrownCherry

Holt

KeyaPaha Rock

Adams

Butte

Corson DeweyGregory

HaakonHarding

Jackson

Jones

Lyman

Meade Mellette

Perkins

Stanley

Todd

Tripp

Ziebach

NE

MT

SD

exp Energ y Services Inc.t: +1.850.385.5441 | f: +1.850.385.55231300 Metropolitan Blvd.Tallah assee, FL 32308U.S.A.www.exp.com

• BUILDINGS • EAR TH & ENVIR ONMENT • ENER GY • • INDUSTR IAL • INFR ASTR UCTUR E • SUSTAINABILITY •

PREPARED BY:

SHEET:DWG: XL-46-P-9299-A-R V-0512-02

KEYSTONE XL PROJECT

DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:

COUNTY:STATE:

CCPD

RV-0512-02 PROPOSED CL RV

REVISION

PRELIMINARY

DATE

2013-10-09DATE:

REV. NO.:

0 ISSUED FOR R EVIEW 2013-10-09

PROJECTION: NAD83 | UTM13 N

MEADESOUTH DAKOTA

RV-0512-02 PROPOSED ROUTE VARIATION

Keystone XL Project

LEGEND

°

2010 PICTOMETRY/2012 NAIP

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

FIELD PATH

MEADECOUNTY

SEC 2T 6N R 17E

ML-SD-ME-01243.000HOWES GRAZING

ASSOCIATION

ML-SD-ME-01240.000HOWES GRAZING

ASSOCIATION, INC.

MP 429

PEM

PEM

INT

INT

MP 428.8

MP 429.1

MP 428.9

RV-0512-02

°

0 125 25062.5 Feet

! 1/10 Mile Post! Mile Post (2013-06-11)

#*

# * Valve

Valve Site

Keystone XL Project Centerline (2013-06-11)

Route Variation

Access Road - Permanent

Access Road - Temporary

Workspace

Cultural Site

Pump Station

Property Parcels

Section Line

County Line

Current Waterbody

Current Wetland

1

Page 8: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

U UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

U

!!

!

!

!

259TH STREET

TRIPPCOUNTY

SEC 11T 102NR 78W

SEC 14T 102NR 78W

ML-SD-TR-10170.000T.J. KNUTSON

ML-SD-TR-10150.000T.J. KNUTSON

ML-SD-TR-10160.000EULA P. COLE

MP 546

MP 546.1

MP 546.2

RV-0512-03

Antelope

Boone

Boyd

Brown

Butler

Colfax

Dodge

Garfield Greeley

Holt

Howard

KeyaPaha

KnoxMadison

Nance

Pierce

Platte

Polk

Rock

Stanton

Valley

Wheeler

Brule CharlesMix

Gregory

Haakon

Hughes

Jackson

Jones

Lyman

Mellette

Stanley

Sully

Todd

Tripp

NESD

exp Energ y Services Inc.t: +1.850.385.5441 | f: +1.850.385.55231300 Metropolitan Blvd.Tallah assee, FL 32308U.S.A.www.exp.com

• BUILDINGS • EAR TH & ENVIR ONMENT • ENER GY • • INDUSTR IAL • INFR ASTR UCTUR E • SUSTAINABILITY •

PREPARED BY:

SHEET:DWG: XL-46-P-9299-A-R V-0512-03

KEYSTONE XL PROJECT

DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:

COUNTY:STATE:

CCPD

RV-0512-03 PROPOSED CL RV

REVISION

PRELIMINARY

DATE

2013-10-09DATE:

REV. NO.:

0 ISSUED FOR R EVIEW 2013-10-09

PROJECTION: NAD83 | UTM14 N

TR IPPSOUTH DAKOTA

RV-0512-03 PROPOSED CL ROUTE VARIATION

Keystone XL Project

LEGEND

°

2010 PICTOMETRY

°

0 125 25062.5 Feet

! 1/10 Mile Post! Mile Post (2013-06-11)

#*

# * Valve

Valve Site

Keystone XL Centerline (2013-06-11)

Route Variation

Access Road - Permanent

Access Road - Temporary

Workspace

Cultural Site

Pump Station

Property Parcel

Section Line

County Line

Current Waterbody

Currently Wetland

1

Page 9: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT PIPELINE ROUTE VARIATION …puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/... · 2015-04-18 · KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT 1 VARIATION TYPE:

Antelope

Boone

Boyd

Brown

Butler

Colfax

Dodge

Garfield Greeley

Holt

Howard

KeyaPaha

KnoxMadison

Nance

Pierce

Platte

Polk

Rock

Stanton

Valley

Wheeler

Brule CharlesMix

Gregory

Haakon

Hughes

Jackson

Jones

Lyman

Mellette

Stanley

Sully

Todd

Tripp

NESD

exp Energ y Services Inc.t: +1.850.385.5441 | f: +1.850.385.55231300 Metropolitan Blvd.Tallah assee, FL 32308U.S.A.www.exp.com

• BUILDINGS • EAR TH & ENVIR ONMENT • ENER GY • • INDUSTR IAL • INFR ASTR UCTUR E • SUSTAINABILITY •

PREPARED BY:

SHEET:DWG: XL-46-P-9299-A-R V-0512-04

KEYSTONE XL PROJECT

DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:

COUNTY:STATE:

CCPD

RV-0512-04 PROPOSED CL RV

REVISION

PRELIMINARY

DATE

2013-10-08DATE:

REV. NO.:

0 ISSUED FOR R EVIEW 2013-10-08

PROJECTION: NAD83 | UTM14 N

TR IPPSOUTH DAKOTA

RV-0512-04 PROPOSED CL ROUTE VARIATION

Keystone XL Project

LEGEND

°

2010 PICTOMETRY

UU

UU

UU

UU

U

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

UU

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

285TH ST

318TH AVENUE

318TH AVE

285ST STREET

TRIPPCOUNTY

SEC 27T 98NR 76W

SEC 26T 98NR 76W

SEC 34T 98NR 76W

SEC 35T 98NR 76WML-SD-TR-11280.000

JAMES E. &KATHERINE M. CAHOY

ML-SD-TR-11330.000MARLIN & MARILYN HAUKAAS,

WILLIAM & JEANNE MANZER

ML-SD-TR-11290.000RORY M KLEIN,

RODERICK G. KLEIN,HUSTIN D KLEIN,SHARON M KLEIN

MP 577

PEM

INTMP 57

6.9

MP 576.8

MP 577.1

RV-0512-04

0 125 25062.5 Feet

! 1/10 Mile Post! Mile Post (2013-06-11)

#*

# * Valve

Valve Site

Keystone XL Centerline (2013-06-11)

Route Variation

Access Road - Permanent

Access Road - Temporary

Workspace

Cultural Site

Pump Station

Property Parcel

Section Line

County Line

Current Waterbody

Currently Wetland

1

°