key worker housing and community... · introduction 1.1.1. in september 2018, the director general...
TRANSCRIPT
Government of Jersey
Key Worker Housing Final Report
December 2018
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | i
Contents
Executive Summary 1
Section 1: Introduction and Context 7
Introduction 8
Socio-Economic Context 9
Political Context 11
Population Context 13
Housing in Jersey 16
Section 2: Key Worker Definition 19
International use of the term ‘Key Worker’ 20
Developing a Definition 22
Recommended Government of Jersey Key Worker Definition 25
Section 3: Key Worker Situation and Drivers for Change 28
Recruitment 29
Retention 32
Implications of Recruitment and Retention Challenges 34
Section 4: Key Worker Accommodation Options 36
Introduction to Key Worker Accommodation 37
Options for Key Worker Accommodation 39
Affordable Leasing 41
Affordable Ownership 47
Section 5: Recommendations 51
Options Appraisal 52
Suggested Approach 54
Financial Implications 58
Recommendations and Next Steps 61
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | ii
Appendix 1 | Document Review List 62
Appendix 2 | Interviewees and Focus Groups 64
Appendix 3 | Affordability Calculations 65
Appendix 4 | Financial Assumptions 69
Appendix 5 | Best Practice Case Studies 71
Appendix 6 | Technical Annex: Housing Demand Analysis 73
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | iii
Tables and Figures Table 1: Key Worker Recruitment Push and Pull Factors 2
Table 2: Key Worker Retention Push and Pull Factors 3
Figure 3: Options for a key worker housing solution 4
Figure 4: Key worker journey 5
Table 5: Residential and employment statuses 14
Table 6: Rental Affordability Calculations 17
Table 7: Example Uses Of the term ‘Key Worker’ 21
Figure 8: Stepped key worker definition 22
Table 9: Suggested key worker definition 26
Table 10: Aspects of a key worker definition 27
Table 11: International approaches to key worker accommodation 38
Figure 12: Options for a key worker housing solution 39
Table 13: SFA analysis 40
Table 14: Illustrative financial performance of the leasing options 43
Table 15: SFA analysis of short-term leasing 44
Table 16: SFA analysis of long-term leasing 45
Table 17: Illustrative financial performance of the ownership options 48
Table 18: SFA analysis of partial ownership 49
Table 19: SFA analysis of full ownership 50
Table 20: Summary of SFA for key worker options 52
Figure 21: Key worker journey 54
Table 22: Demand Analysis of Three Housing Options 56
Table 23: Unit mix required for key worker accommodation based on census data 57
Table 24: Assumed delivery of Key Worker Accommodation 58
Figure 25: Annual Surplus for Block Leasing and Development approaches 58
Table 26: Business plan debt and financial ratios 59
Figure 27: Interest Cover 59
Figure 28: Debt per Unit 59
Figure 29: Net Debt 60
Figure 30: Operating Costs per Unit excluding inflation 60
Table 31: Assumptions for illustrative modelling of options 69
Table 32: Base assumptions for financial modelling 70
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | iv
Our report is addressed to the Government of Jersey. We stress that our report is confidential and
prepared for the addressees only. It should not be used, reproduced or circulated for any other purpose,
whether in whole or in part without our prior written consent, which consent will only be given after full
consideration of the circumstances at the time.
If the report is released to a third party without prior consent from Altair, we do not acknowledge any duty
of care to the third party and do not accept liability for any reliance placed on the report.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 1
Executive Summary
1.1. Introduction
1.1.1. In September 2018, the Director General Department for Strategic Policy,
Performance and Population (SPPP) appointed Altair to undertake research into the
suitability of a key worker accommodation solution to address staff recruitment and
retention difficulties faced by a number of the Government of Jersey’s (GoJ’s)
departments. This report summarises our findings and makes recommendations as
to:
▪ How the term key worker could be defined for use by GoJ
▪ Options for delivering a key worker accommodation solution
1.2. Context
1.2.1. Jersey has high vacancy rates in a number of areas of Health, Education and
Children’s Services provision, and there have been difficulties in both the recruitment
and retention of staff in these areas. Jersey’s island geography and limited training
opportunities means that Jersey often has to rely on off-island recruitment (whether of
people new to Jersey or returnees) to fill vacant positions.
1.2.2. The provision of services, and therefore the need for staff, in these departments can
be seen as essential to the health and wellbeing of the island, but are made more
critical by both the findings of the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry (IJCI) and
subsequent OFSTED inspection which found failings in Jersey’s child care system,
and changing demographics on the island as the population, in common with many
other Western nations ages.
1.2.3. On the island, restricting access to work and housing is used to control population
(e.g. inward migration) but can create difficulties for key workers and their families
when moving to the island. However, the government has taken steps to reduce
these barriers, and while our qualitative research suggests these measures are not
currently widely understood, it is hoped that this will in future support key workers and
their families to remain on the island.
1.2.4. Jersey has a high cost of living, and low housing affordability in both the rental and
ownership markets. This can make it challenging for all residents, including key
workers to afford accommodation. However, housing assistance through the housing
gateway is only open to those who have been resident on the island for ten years.
This has left many key workers in the private leased sector where accommodation is
reported to be of a low standard, although the introduction of the recent Public Health
and Safety (rented dwellings) Law should begin to address this.
1.2.5. In addition to the private market, GoJ provides c.224 homes in locations located near
to key worker workplaces. Of these 134 (60%) are provided to Health or Education
staff.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 2
1.3. Key Worker Definition
1.3.1. The term ‘key worker’ is widely used in the UK and has also been adopted by the
States of Guernsey, and to some extent in New Zealand and Australia. The term is
specifically linked to housing solutions for particular employee groups where there are
skills shortages, or their roles are seen as essential. The purpose of defining what it
means to be a key worker is to enable policy interventions targeted at this group of
workers. Internationally approaches generally focus on four key factors:
▪ The service that the key worker is involved in providing
▪ A skills shortage, or other recruitment difficulties
▪ The public sector as an employer
▪ Income threshold that determines qualification
1.3.2. Through workshops with cross-departmental stakeholder engagement, we developed
the following recommended definition of key worker in the context of Jersey:
Those in (1) delivering statutory services or those akin to statutory services, where
there is (2) evidenced difficulty in recruiting and retaining staff, who have a (3)
household income below a minimum threshold.
1.3.3. Further analysis will be required for this definition to be able to be adopted, and
Jersey will need to determine:
▪ Which roles are statutory or akin to statutory for the delivery of public services?
▪ Which roles are difficult to recruit to and retain staff in?
▪ What should be the household income threshold?
1.4. Barriers to Recruiting and Retaining Key Workers
1.4.1. Key workers in Jersey come from both on-island (where training may be required) and
off-island (whether having previously lived in Jersey, those from the UK or those from
other nations). While there are common pull factors and barriers in recruitment for
these pools, some factors may be specific to the expectations and experiences of
each group. Further, an individual’s circumstances (e.g. household composition,
lifestyle preferences, culture and values) will influence the extent to which they
experience the pull factors and barriers.
1.4.2. Table 1, below highlights the competing recruitment pressures for key workers
Table 1: Key Worker Recruitment Push and Pull Factors
Pull Factors Barriers
▪ Funding for training
▪ Higher salaries
▪ Additional responsibilities
▪ Low tax regime
▪ Similar culture to the UK
▪ Moving benefits
▪ Perceived lifestyle benefits
▪ International skills shortages
▪ Significance of moving to Jersey
▪ Employment, health and housing
▪ Difficulties in securing accommodation prior to moving
▪ Probation period
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 3
1.4.3. In terms of key worker retention there is also a competing set of pressures
determining whether a key worker is retained or exits (either by leaving the island or
leaving the profession). These are summarised in table 2.
Table 2: Key Worker Retention Push and Pull Factors
Key Push Factors
▪ Provision of key worker accommodation (where this is available)
▪ ‘Settling’ of family members (particularly dependents)
▪ Lifestyle benefits
▪ Reported good work-life balance
▪ Better career progression opportunities
▪ Cost of living, particularly housing affordability
▪ Housing quality
▪ Lack of preparedness to make the move to Jersey
▪ Weaknesses in the on-boarding process
▪ Lack of clarity over employment and housing policy
▪ Sense of inequity between permanent and locum / agency staff
1.4.4. The recruitment and retention difficulties for GoJ have implications both in terms of
the need to rely on short-term staff and increases in the cost of recruitment. This has
not only financial consequences for GoJ, but creates difficulties in workforce
sustainability, morale, quality of service delivery, and the relationships with service
users.
1.5. Key Worker Accommodation
1.5.1. Internationally there are a range of approaches to key worker accommodation,
including both leased and ownership models. As such GoJ could offer key-workers
one of four tenures:
▪ Short-term leasing (‘Landing’ accommodation)
▪ Long-term leasing at an affordable rate
▪ Part-ownership which may function similarly to Andium Home Buy
▪ Full-ownership
1.5.2. With housing being delivered through:
▪ Development or refurbishment to provide new or renovated homes
▪ Block leasing from the private sector and social housing providers and sub-leased on to key workers
▪ Private sector subsidy (e.g. a rental subsidy scheme, or money towards home purchase on the private market)
1.5.3. There is potential overlap between tenures in the delivery mechanisms, as illustrated
in figure 3 below.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 4
Figure 3: Options for a key worker housing solution
1.5.4. We tested each of these options with key stakeholders, and considered their
appropriateness in meeting Jersey objectives, how implementable they would be for
GoJ, and their acceptability to key stakeholders including politicians and the Jersey
public. This is called an SFA analysis.
1.5.5. On the basis of this analysis the full ownership tenure was excluded as it was seen as
inequitable to offer this opportunity to key workers when other groups on the island
were also struggling with the affordability of home ownership. Further, full ownership
models result in a permanent loss of the home into the general market, whereas in a
partial ownership scheme, a home can be affordable in perpetuity and recycled for
use by another key worker in the future.
1.5.6. Private sector subsidy was also ruled out as a delivery route. This was due to the
likely market distorting effects that any such subsidy would have on the already
expensive private leased and home ownership markets in Jersey.
1.5.7. The recommended approach is therefore a combined offer of:
▪ Landing accommodation: Short-term leased accommodation available for 6 – 9 months and open to all key workers (regardless of income) arriving on the island, at a market rent. This will provide the opportunity for key workers to settle and become familiar with the housing market in Jersey before moving to longer term accommodation.
▪ Long-term leasing: Accommodation leased on 3 – 4-year terms (to allow a review of key worker circumstances), to those below an income threshold at the social rent rate to ensure the accommodation is affordable and provide security of tenure.
▪ Partial ownership: Sale of homes at a discount (c.25%) with the homes covenanted to remain within the key worker ownership scheme and to be affordable in perpetuity.
1.5.8. The way a key worker may interact with these different types of accommodation
throughout their career is shown in figure 4.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 5
Figure 4: Key worker journey
1.5.9. Our initial modelling suggests that to deliver this mixed offer through development of
new homes would be financially viable for GoJ, although the landing accommodation
is cross subsidised by other tenures. However, block leasing would have a cost to
GoJ and require ongoing revenue subsidy. Once, the definition has been determined,
further demand analysis is required to inform more detailed financial modelling to
understand the impact of a key worker offer on GoJ budgets and financing
requirements.
1.6. Recommendations
1.6.1. Based on the findings of this report we recommend that GoJ:
▪ adopt the key worker definition: ‘those in (1) delivering statutory services or those akin to statutory services, where there is (2) evidenced difficulty in recruiting and retaining staff, who have a (3) household income is below a minimum threshold.
▪ review employment practices, such as the use of probations and other non-accommodation barriers to recruitment and retention which it has control over
▪ develops key worker accommodation provision made up of three offers:
Short-term ‘landing’ accommodation for new arrivals
Long-term leased accommodation
Partial ownership
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 6
1.7. Next Steps
1.7.1. To implement the recommendation GoJ, need to:
1. Agree how the minimum income threshold will be calculated to inform further key worker accommodation research.
2. Obtain or collect more detailed data on skills shortages, and vacancies to evidence those roles that will fit within the key worker definition, and to inform more detailed demand analysis.
3. Undertake more detailed financial modelling to establish the likely level of subsidy required to deliver the scheme, but also to quantify likely savings in recruitment costs and the use of short-term staff.
4. Consult more widely on the proposed approach to further test the suggested offer with stakeholders, and potentially key workers as the target market.
5. Seek approval of the newly formed Housing Policy Development Board and incorporate the approach into relevant strategic documents.
6. Make any required changes in legislation to facilitate the delivery of the key worker accommodation solution.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 7
Section 1: Introduction and Context
Overview
This section summarises key contextual considerations identified in the desktop and
qualitative research phases of the project, which inform our understanding of the challenges
facing the Government of Jersey (GoJ) in relation to key workers, and more specifically key
worker accommodation.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 8
Introduction
2.1.1. In September 2018, the Director General Department for Strategic Policy,
Performance and Population (SPPP) appointed Altair to undertake research into the
suitability of a key worker accommodation solution to address staff recruitment and
retention difficulties faced by a number of the Government of Jersey’s (GOJ’s)
departments, including Health, Education and Children’s Services.
2.1.2. From September 2018 to November 2018, Altair undertook research into key worker
housing as a recruitment and retention tool for essential public sector workers and
developed options for housing delivery for Jersey. This report provides the findings of
this work.
2.1.3. The aim of the research of was to deepen GoJ’s knowledge base about key worker
recruitment and retention challenges related to housing. The scope of the project was
to:
▪ Research who Jersey’s key workers are and understand the extent to which the availability and affordability of housing impacts the recruitment and retention of key workers
▪ Define what the term ‘key worker’ should mean for Jersey with a particular focus on the use of the term for GoJ’s internal policies
▪ Outline and recommend high-level options for delivering a key worker housing solution to address challenges identified in the research
2.1.4. Our approach to this research was based on five key activities:
▪ A desktop review of State’s policy framework, the external operating environment in Jersey, market analysis and other relevant data to establish the context of housing affordability and accessibility for key workers
▪ Qualitative research engaging in one-on-one conversations and focus groups with staff from relevant government departments (including Health, Education and Children’s Services), and currently employed key workers to understand the extent of the impact of housing on key worker recruitment and retention and to explore potential solutions
▪ A best practice review examining international approaches to housing solutions for key workers
▪ Options development and appraisal including assessing high-level financial implications and working with key government stakeholders.
▪ Presentation of recommendations in this report
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 9
Socio-Economic Context
3.1. Overview
3.1.1. The socio-economic context of Jersey is important in defining the key worker
experience outside of the workplace, particularly in relation to affordability. It also
underscores the importance of key workers on the island and can be seen as a key
factor shaping the public acceptability of particular solutions.
3.2. Geography and Economy
3.2.1. Jersey is an independent Crown Dependency. It forms part of the British Isles but has
its own laws and its own parliament. Jersey is the largest of the Channel Islands.
3.2.2. Jersey has a constitutional relationship with UK that gives Jersey the rights to self-
govern and have independent courts, but Jersey is neither part of, nor independent of
the UK. Jersey is not part of the EU but is treated as part of the EU for the purposes
of free trade of goods. Jersey’s culture is influenced by its Norman heritage and
English and French cultural traditions and today Jersey has a similar culture to that of
the UK. English is Jersey’s main language but Jèrriais (Jersey French) is taught in
most schools as a traditional language1.
3.2.3. Jersey’s island geography has a number of implications for its society and economy.
Formal professional training, and other upskilling opportunities are limited in Jersey
due to the size of Jersey’s economy, so it is not uncommon for Jersey natives to
leave the island for a period to study or undertake specialist training courses early in
their careers. These movements may be encouraged by employers because they
allow prospective employees to gain international insight with the hope that Jersey
natives will return to work on the island. However, one possible effect of this trend is
that gaps exist in particular employment skills. For example, in the sectors which are
the focus of this report:
▪ GoJ has budget for 34 Psychologists, and currently has 6 vacancies (18% vacancy rate)
▪ GoJ has budget for 51 Children’s Social Workers, and currently has 25 vacancies (48% vacancy rate)
▪ GoJ has budget for 117 Mental Health Nurses, and currently has 21 vacancies (18% vacancy rate)2
3.2.4. Some Jersey natives leave the island for most, or for the duration of their careers.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that some individuals return to Jersey later in life for
healthcare reasons or for a change in lifestyle due to retirement. A continued increase
in the population of these individuals has important implications on health and social
care systems on the island.
3.2.5. Although Jersey’s tourism industry developed as an important industry post-WWII, the
financial services sector has grown in importance to the Jersey economy since the
last quarter of the twentieth century. Today, financial services make up nearly 40% of
1 Jèrriais: Jersey's traditional language, GOV.je 2 Key Worker and Vacancy Analysis - August 2018
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 10
Jersey’s Gross Value Added (GVA), whereas hotels, bars and restaurants make up
4.2% of Jersey’s GVA3.
3.3. Cost of Living
3.3.1. The cost of living in Jersey is high, with monthly expenditure on all non-housing
goods and services about 33% higher in Jersey than in the UK and about 15% higher
than in the UK’s most expensive region (London)45.
3.3.2. In 2013 the Jersey Statistics Unit found that price levels for consumer goods and
services (excluding housing costs, health and education) in Jersey were 9% greater
than the UK average and were marginally greater in Jersey than in London (by
2%).When housing, health and education was also taken into account the overall
price level for consumer goods and services in Jersey was a fifth higher than the UK
average.
3.3.3. This high cost of living is likely to be a result of the combined effect of Jersey’s
geography and housing, and the impact of leisure offers for the financial sector.
3 National accounts: GVA and GDP, GOV.je 4 Jersey Household spending 2014/15 5 Family spending in the UK: financial year ending March 2016 RPI increase in Jersey was broadly comparable to that of the UK and London over the RPI publishing period of 2016-2018 so these 2014/15 figures for household spending are a sound proxy for current household spending.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 11
Political Context
4.1. Overview
4.1.1. The political context has a direct impact on the importance of the priority given to any
key worker housing solution, and also the possibility of any solution being
implemented by GoJ. This is particularly true where changes will require new primary
legislation.
4.2. Political system and elections
4.2.1. The States of Jersey is Jersey’s parliament. The States Assembly comprises eight
Senators, twenty-nine Deputies and twelve parish Connétables. These positions are
decided by popular vote. Deputies and Connétables each represent a parish or in the
case of larger parishes, a Deputy may represent an electoral district within a parish.6
This system acts to ensure the population is evenly represented and that political
figures are accountable to their local jurisdictions.
4.2.2. Jersey currently has only one registered political party, Reform Jersey, who have five
seats in the States Assembly. A majority of postholders in the States Assembly are
independent.
4.2.3. The Council of Ministers contains the ministry lead for the government’s various
departments. Each Minister is nominated by the Chief Minister and then appointed by
the States.
4.2.4. In May 2018, the Jersey General Election led to changes in the ministerial team,
including of most relevance to this work, the appointment of Senator Sam Mézec as
the Minister of Housing in June 2018. In July 2018, the role was widened to become
the Minister of Children and Housing.
4.2.5. This ministerial change came as the result of the government’s commitment to the
outcomes of the 2017 Independent Jersey Care Inquiry (IJCI), which found
systematic failings in the delivery of Children’s Services in Jersey from the post-war
period to the present. A 2018 OFSTED inspection confirmed these findings.
4.3. Independent Jersey Care Inquiry
4.3.1. One of the recommendations from the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry (IJCI) report
focused on building a sustainable workforce. As a result, recent government policies,
such as £686,000 worth of government investment into on-island training programme
for social workers7, have been implemented to develop a stable and skilled children’s
service workforce and to reduce Jersey’s reliance on contract and other temporary
staff.
4.3.2. Whilst the IJCI did not directly reference housing as a barrier to the recruitment and
retention of a sustainable childcare workforce, qualitative evidence suggests access,
availability and affordability of housing are inhibitors to both recruitment and retention.
6 States of Jersey States Assembly, GOV.je 7 “A new social work degree course for Jersey” from July 2018
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 12
4.3.3. This assumption is in line with the government’s latest Housing Strategy, which sets
out that a key priority for the Minister is the development of a definition of and a
housing strategy for key workers, especially those in health and social work.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 13
Population Context
5.1. Overview
5.1.1. Jersey’s population policies, which control access to work and housing, act to
preserve Jersey’s finite resources and the way of life for residents. A successful
housing solution for key workers must work within the framework of these priorities.
5.2. Population Changes
5.2.1. Jersey’s resident population is approximately 105,500. During 2017, the resident
population increased by 1,300 of which net-inward migration accounted for 1,200 and
natural growth (the excess of births over deaths) accounted for 100.
5.2.2. Jersey has unique population demographics characterised by three distinct groups:
▪ Permanent residents
▪ Long-term temporary residents
▪ Seasonal residents
5.2.3. Each group has a different household and age profile.8 The age profile of the latter
two population groups is markedly differently to the permanent resident population,
with mainly working-age people, which makes it difficult for Jersey to model their
future dependency ratio (the ratio of non-working age population to the working age
population), and the accompanying effect on Jersey’s heath and care resources. This
is further complicated by the non-standard ageing of Jersey’s permanent resident
population, since as mentioned previously some of this group will move and return to
Jersey or will not return at all.
5.2.4. However, despite these difficulties, it can be said that in line with other developed
nations Jersey has an ageing population characterised by a low mortality rate and a
high life expectancy. The crude mortality rate was 7.6 deaths per 1,000 population,
which is a figure that has been falling over time. Moreover, the average (mean) age
at death for Jersey residents was 79 years, which is an increase of 12 years since
1960.9
5.2.5. In addition to an ageing population, Jersey has recently experienced relatively high
net-inward migration figures. In 2015, 1,500 individuals migrated to the island, a figure
which rose from an estimated baseline of net-inward migration of 700 people per
annum in 2013 and 2014,10 population growth caused by net-inward migration may
have implications of the island’s resources and can impact residents’ quality of life.
5.3. Effect on work and housing
5.3.1. While anyone from the UK or the EEA can move to Jersey11, access to certain
categories of housing and work is controlled. The purpose of the legislation is to
8 Oxera, What is the economic impact of Jersey’s aging population 9 Annual Mortality Statistics, GOV.je 10 Jersey population projections 2016 release 11 Control of Housing and Work (Jersey) Law 2012
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 14
control overall population density of Jersey and protect the availability of work and
housing to individuals from Jersey or who have close associations with Jersey. This is
summarised in table 5, below.
Table 5: Residential and employment statuses
Status Definition Working rights Housing market
access
Entitled
10+ years
continuous
residence
Can work anywhere Full access
Licensed ‘Essential employee’
Employer needs
permission to
employ
Cannot access first
time buyer or social
rented housing
Entitled for
Work Only
5+ years residence,
or married to an
entitled, licensed or
entitled for work
person
Can work anywhere
Can buy property jointly
with an ‘entitled’ spouse
or civil partner.
Can only lease
‘registered’
accommodation.
Registered Other persons
Employer needs
permission to
employ
Can only lease
‘registered’
accommodation.
5.3.2. The Government of Jersey limits migration by approving work applications which
deliver the greatest social and economic value. The government will grant “Licensed”
or “Registered” status to individuals who demonstrate economic and social value and
where “Entitled” or “Entitled for Work” staff are unavailable. The government
population policies limit the kind of housing that new arrivals to the island have
access to. Currently, over four-fifths of the resident population possessed housing
qualifications (enabling them to access all areas of the housing market), whereas one
in eight (13%) people were not-locally qualified.12
5.3.3. Population policies also mandate who in a household can work. This is driven by the
employment and residential status of the sponsored worker. Generally, family
members of a sponsored worker will have no rights to employment. However, in
January 2018, following the combined pressures of recruitment and retention
difficulties faced by Health and Social Services and the recommendations made in
the IJCI, it became law to exempt the co-habiting partner of a specified key worker
from the maximum number of Registered individuals a business can employ, making
it easier for the partners of key workers to work in Jersey.13 A similar law for the
children of key workers aged under-25 is in draft. These policies are designed to
reduce the burden on key workers whose partners and children have not been able to
participate in Jersey’s job market openly prior to 2018.
5.3.4. The Housing and Work Advisory Group, which falls under the responsibility of the
Chief Minister, is due to review the population strategy in Spring of 2019. One of the
12 2011 Census 13 Control of Housing and Work (Exemptions) (Jersey) Order 2013
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 15
proposed changes includes a work permit system whereby employees are permitted
to stay in Jersey for 10 months before re-applying for a further 10-month work permit.
It is currently unknown if employees under this system would qualify for access to
open market housing, or if these individuals would be able to accrue time to reach
qualifications under the proposed system.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 16
Housing in Jersey
6.1. Overview
6.1.1. Housing affordability is a problem in both the rental and ownership markets in Jersey.
For those moving to the island restrictions on access to accommodation can
exacerbate this issue. Housing difficulties have been cited as a barrier to key worker
recruitment, but any solution needs to be seen as fair to the wider population who are
also facing housing stress.
6.2. The Housing Market: Ownership
6.2.1. Buying a home in Jersey is difficult for many. The overall housing affordability index
has declined by 7% over the past 5-year period, making it increasingly more difficult
for households to own a home. In 2017, a working household with a mean net income
was not able to service a mortgage affordably on the purchase price of a median-
priced house of any size, but they could afford to purchase a median priced two
bedroom flat.14 For many, including key workers, home ownership in Jersey is out of
reach at current prices.
6.2.2. New arrivals to the island who wish to purchase a home, have a six-month residential
waiting period to qualify for a Jersey mortgage. This waiting period gives some newly-
arrived key workers no choice but to enter into one- or two-year rental contracts in the
private rental sector.
6.3. The Housing Market: Leasing
6.3.1. At the most recent census (2011) leasing accounted for 46% of housing tenure in
Jersey. Residential leases are governed by the Residential Tenancy (Jersey) Law
2011. Leases are normally for a period of one or two years. Leases of more than 9
years are known as ‘contract leases’, while shorter leases are described as ‘paper
leases’. As contract leases are required to be passed before the Royal Court leases
of this length are uncommon in the residential leasing market.
6.3.2. The issue of housing affordability is also a challenge in the private leased sector.
Based on the JHAI definition of accommodation being affordable at 30% of household
income15, even a one-bedroom flat is likely to be unaffordable for the average FTE
employee (based on 2018 average earnings of c. £3,200pm or c. £38,400 pa16). This
is shown in table 6 below.
14 JHAI, 2017 15 JHAI definition of affordability 16Government of Jersey Index of Average Earnings from June 2018
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 17
Table 6: Rental Affordability Calculations
Bedroom Size Median monthly rental Required income to
affordably rent
1-bedroom £1,200pm £48,000pa
2-bedroom £1,750pm £70,000pa
3-bedroom £2,375pm £95,000pa
6.3.3. A further analysis of affordability by government employee pay band is included in
Appendix 3.
6.3.4. The quality of housing in the private rental sector is relatively poor. To address this,
the government has recently passed legislation17 mandating that homes available for
rent meet minimum standards for environmental health. This law in conjunction with
GoJ’s Rent Safe landlord accreditation scheme may go some way to improve quality
in privately leased accommodation.
6.4. Social and Affordable Housing
6.4.1. Jersey operates a social housing service via the Affordable Housing Gateway, a
waiting list for those registered for social housing in Jersey. The Gateway contains six
priority bands including a high-priority Band 1, a request for homeownership
assistance Band 4, and an extra-care Band 6. Financial, medical and housing
circumstances all affect which band someone is placed in.18
6.4.2. While GoJ operates the waiting list, placements are made in partnership with Andium
Homes (“Andium”), Jersey’s largest affordable housing provider, and other affordable
housing providers who allocate social units on the Gateway. Andium has a portfolio of
c. 4,500 homes and four other providers have a combined c. 1,300 homes, totalling c.
5,800 social homes in Jersey.
6.4.3. Social housing rents are generally charged at about 90% of the market equivalent for
each property type. Andium estimates this to approximately:
▪ £965 per month for a 1-bedroom flat
▪ £1,157 per month for a 2-bedroom flat
▪ £1,356 per month for a 3-bedroom flat
▪ £1,603 for a 3-bedroom house
6.4.4. Although these rents are set below the market rate, due to the high prices in the
market, 90% of the market rate may still be unaffordable for many households. To
address this issue, Andium’s Board has discussed replacing annual rent increases of
5% with increases of RPI +0.75%. However, it is important to note that rent levels are
key to funding the delivery of new housing by Andium and it is likely any downward
pressure on rents would require subsidy.
6.4.5. Andium also operates an affordable home ownership scheme through Andium
HomeBuy, a programme which allows first time buyers to apply for a 25% deferred
payment on a property sold by Andium. To qualify for the scheme, individuals must
17 Public Health and Safety (rented dwellings) Law 18 Affordable Housing Gateway, GOV.je
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 18
apply to be registered to the Housing Gateway Band 5. As of September 2018, 1,169
individuals were registered at Band 5 however in 2017, Andium sold only 28
properties under the scheme.
6.4.6. While interest in the scheme is high there is conflict between the pressure of meeting
first time buyer demand, and concerns that the sale of homes removes them from the
pool of much-needed social stock. Andium have increased their sales target under
the scheme to 40 existing homes per annum from 2018. Andium understands that
selling existing stock is an inadequate solution and is keen to develop more homes to
meet demand for the programme.
6.5. Key Worker Accommodation
6.5.1. Historically, key worker units owned by GoJ were managed by departments within
GoJ. However, as part of the move to a more collaborative government
administration, Jersey Property Holdings (JPH) has taken over the management of
the portfolio of publicly-owned residential properties and is responsible for organising
the long-term leasing of the units to government’s departments or private tenants.
6.5.2. Jersey Property Holdings manages c.224 homes of publicly-owned residential
accommodation19. Current use of the stock includes:
▪ 124 units provided for Health and Social Services Departments or affiliated personnel
▪ 10 units provided for the Education Department of affiliated personnel
▪ 59 units provided for private tenants (41 of which have long leaseholds)
▪ 13 units provided for prison staff
▪ 14 units provided for etc. government and military purposes
▪ 4 units currently vacant
6.5.3. The majority of these homes are located near to schools, the hospital or the prison.
56 units are located at Westaway Court and 30 bedrooms are located at Peter Crill
house, within the hospital site in St Helier. These properties are due to be demolished
as part of the Future Hospital project.
6.5.4. Some of the accommodation lost through the demolition, will be replaced through the
renovation of 48 two-bedroom and studio apartments at Convent Court (now Plaisant
Court) made available for Health and Community Services & Children, Education,
Young People and Skills staff.
6.5.5. Key workers’ access to government owned accommodation, and the rent they pay for
the accommodation varies considerably from person-to-person and allocations are
made in an ad-hoc manner. This may be due to historic decentralisation of the
management of the properties, and different HR strategies pursued by departments,
but has led to a sense of inequity amongst key workers, and lack of clarity over the
entitlement of different groups.
19 2018 08 15 All FH & Flying FH Residential Units
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 19
Section 2: Key Worker Definition
Overview
This section addresses how the term key worker is used globally, and can be refined, to
develop a definition that supports GoJ, in making policy interventions to address
recruitment and retention difficulties it experiences in a number of its key public sector
service areas.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 20
International use of the term ‘Key Worker’
7.1. Overview
7.1.1. Globally, the term ‘key worker’ is generally used to describe essential, usually public
sector, workers and is linked to housing solutions. For policy purposes, this definition
is traditionally used in conjunction with criteria to determine who qualifies for public
financial assistance.
7.2. Why ‘Key Worker’?
7.2.1. The term ‘key worker’ is widely used in the UK and has also been adopted by the
States of Guernsey, and to some extent in New Zealand and Australia. The term is
specifically linked to housing solutions for particular employee groups where there are
skills shortages, or their roles are seen as essential. Therefore, the concept of a ‘key
worker’ is embedded in that of key worker housing.
7.2.2. The purpose of defining what it means to be a key worker is to enable policy
interventions targeted at this group of workers. Therefore, any definition is partially
driven by the need for policy interventions, with key workers usually being:
▪ Groups which are recognised as being essential (and often in public sector roles)
▪ Groups where there is a skills shortage, or other difficulties in recruitment and / or retention of staff
▪ Groups where their income from remuneration is insufficient to meet their housing costs, or there is a lack of availability of suitable housing (either due to location, market access, or prices)
7.3. The Government’s Needs for a Key Worker Definition
7.3.1. The government understands that prior to the development of key worker housing
policy, they must first decide a flexible and measurable definition of the term ‘key
worker’, that is able to drive policy interventions and adapt to the changing needs of
the island.
7.3.2. We’ve noted in section 1 that as an island, Jersey has particular skills pressures, and
may face larger obstacles in recruiting and retaining staff with essential skills that
ensure the island’s health and wellbeing. For Jersey, defining key workers may act as
a catalyst for policy intervention to ensure that these essential workers are recruited
and retained on the island.
7.3.3. However, it is worth noting that a definition of key workers is unlikely to provide a
‘silver bullet’ for all skills shortages on the island, and residential and employee status
will also need to be considered as part of the solution for both key worker and non-
key worker skills gaps in Jersey.
7.4. Perspectives on Key Workers: Case Studies
7.4.1. As noted above there are different international approaches to the definition of a key
worker, however in many nations different reward models mean that the term key
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 21
worker or an equivalent is not used in policy, as those in employment receive
remuneration at a sufficient level to meet their living costs, or alternative universal
approaches to subsidising living costs are adopted.
7.4.2. Examples of some of the different definitions of key workers are provided in table 7
below. These show the four key factors that are often considered within a definition:
▪ The service that the key worker is involved in providing
▪ A skills shortage, or other recruitment difficulties
▪ The public sector as an employer
▪ Income threshold that determine qualification
Table 7: Example Uses Of the term ‘Key Worker’
Definition
Example
Essential Service
Delivery Skills shortage
Employer
(Public Sector) Income
HomeBuy Service
(UK)
“who is
considered to
provide an
essential service”
“a public sector
employee”
“with a household
income below
£60k p.a.”
Clarion Housing
Association (UK)
“in a statutory role
delivering an
essential public
service”
“where there are
serious
recruitment and
retention
problems”
“someone
employed by the
public sector”
London Borough
of Southwark
(UK)
“where the
Council
understands the
key recruitment,
issues are in the
borough”
“based on an
analysis of
average key
worker salaries”
Guernsey
“employees that
deliver a statutory
service”
“where the
recruitment and
retention of staff
has proven to be
difficult”
“employees that
deliver a public
service”
“are in receipt of
incomes that do
not enable them
to afford to buy or
rent in the
general housing
market”
7.5. Implications for Jersey
7.5.1. The examples provided show the four components widely used in defining key
workers, which Jersey may wish to adopt. The following section considers how a
definition can be tailored to the needs of Jersey.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 22
Developing a Definition
8.1. Overview
8.1.1. A comparison of the global perspectives outlined in the previous section shows that a
key worker definition can be broken down into four key areas of detail. These can be
understood to form a ‘stepped’ approach to defining Jersey’s key workers.
8.2. Requirements of a Definition
8.2.1. The government needs a flexible definition that can be adapted over time, as the
external context changes, but which also supports the use of interventions where
required to enable GoJ to maintain its essential statutory workforce.
8.2.2. The definition should also be able to justify the use of public funds for interventions in
the context of public sector fiscal constraint, and widespread affordability issues
among the general population. As such it is important that the group to be defined as
‘key workers’ will have public and political support.
8.3. A Stepped Key Worker Definition
8.3.1. Drawing from the key factors highlighted in the previous section a stepped approach
to defining key workers can be taken, where the definition becomes progressively
narrower, as show in figure 8 below.
Figure 8: Stepped key worker definition
8.3.2. The increasing narrowness of the definition helps limit the volume of people to which
it applies, reducing the potential scale of financing required to provide an intervention,
and may also act to allay public concern over any proposed intervention.
8.3.3. Each element of the definition is considered in more detail below.
8.4. Essential Service Delivery
8.4.1. It could be argued that any role that is important or essential to the functioning of
Jersey’s economy and community, or alternatively essential to the health and
Essential Service Delivery
Difficulties in recruitment / retention and / or skills shortage
Employed in the public sector
Income below a threshold
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 23
wellbeing of the populace is a key worker. This approach could encompass the
public, voluntary and private sectors. Given the focus of GoJ in developing key worker
policy, and its role in providing for, and promoting the health and wellbeing of its
citizens, we suggest that the focus of the definition should be on those employees
essential or important to the health and wellbeing of the population of the island.
8.4.2. However, using this definition alone is so broad as to render it impractical for most
policy purposes. Instead, places such as the UK use this basic definition alongside
specific key criteria for policy purposes.
8.5. Difficulties in Recruitment / Retention and Skills Shortages
8.5.1. An additional layer of a definition is to include any role that meets the first criteria of
being important or essential to the health and wellbeing of the people of Jersey,
where there is a skills shortage or recruitment or retention difficulty.
8.5.2. While this approach may be more useful in a policy context (and particularly
residential and employment status determinations), where it includes the private
sector for state-funded interventions, it risks accusations of public subsidy of low
private sector wages.
8.6. Employed in the Public Sector
8.6.1. Where the state is making interventions for example. by providing housing at a
reduced cost or subsidising particular services a focus on public sector workers
prevents public money being spent to offset a remuneration issue in the private sector
(e.g. that the private sector is not able to recruit to roles because it does not pay
sufficiently).
8.6.2. However, the breadth of the public sector may mean that this definition is not
sufficiently narrow. One way that this has been overcome in other jurisdictions is to
focus on ‘frontline’ roles. This can often garner wider public support as these tend to
be seen as vital roles. However, defining ‘frontline’ can be difficult, for example would
a manager of a team of frontline workers, who had little if any interaction with service
users be considered frontline? What about a medical professional who primarily
worked in testing samples or reviewing information rather than with patients?
8.6.3. Further, GoJ commissions a number of its public services from third parties, often
voluntary organisations, whose provision and employees may still be essential to the
health and wellbeing of Jersey. Such groups would be excluded from a definition
focussing on public sector workers, or frontline public sector workers.
8.6.4. Therefore, based on work refining the concept of ‘public sector workers’ through
engagement with a cross departmental workshop, rather than using a definition of
‘public sector employees’ we suggest that key workers be considered to be those who
provide statutory services, or those akin to statutory services. This definition is wide
enough to capture those non-public sector organisations acting on behalf of GoJ,
while still being narrow enough to garner public support and be useful in terms of
designing and implementing interventions.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 24
8.7. Income Below a Threshold
8.7.1. Within the public sector salaries can vary significantly. To ensure interventions (which
are likely to have limited financing) can be targeted to those in greatest need, income
thresholds are often used to limit eligibility.
8.7.2. This aspect of the definition may be flexible and used to limit access to certain
interventions, but not to others depending on the purpose of the proposed scheme,
and desired beneficiary group.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 25
Recommended Government of Jersey Key Worker Definition
9.1. Overview
9.1.1. The previous section has summarised the key elements of an approach to defining
key workers. Focussing on the four key elements we propose a single definition,
based on our research and stakeholder feedback.
9.2. Approach
9.2.1. Alongside the focus on key workers in this project, it has also been identified that
there may be a need for policies that address recruitment difficulties or skills
shortages in roles throughout the island’s workforce that support the economy, e.g.
addressing the shortage of skilled chefs to resource the island’s hospitality sector. We
recommend, however, that these policies should not act to subsidise issues of
insufficient private sector remuneration or poor working conditions.
9.2.2. To address this concern GoJ may wish to adopt two categories of essential
employees:
▪ An island workforce wide definition which will inform economic and population policy and strategy, based on statistically evidenced skills shortages, and recruitment difficulties in roles essential to the health and wellbeing of the island, where Jersey pay is below a threshold for affordability
▪ A ‘key worker’ definition which encompasses roles in statutory public sector services or those akin to statutory services, i.e. arms-length services or charitable services, where there is evidenced difficulty in recruiting and retaining staff and where the household income is below a minimum threshold
9.2.3. The first, broad, definition acknowledges that there may be positions that are hard to
recruit to, necessary to Jersey’s health and wellbeing and where market level
remuneration is insufficient to attract or retain staff. Out of scope to this project, other
strategies may be required to ensure recruitment pressures for these roles are
addressed.
9.2.4. For the purposes of this project, the second ‘key worker’ definition is designed to
allow for the development and implementation of policies to support the recruitment
and retention of staff who deliver essential statutory services either for or on behalf of
GoJ.
9.2.5. By adopting two categories of essential employees, GoJ is better able to administer
focused ‘key worker’ policies within their financial constraints.
9.3. Suggested Key Worker Definition
9.3.1. In developing a suggested definition, we have reflected the need to:
1. Enable policy interventions to address the recruitment and retention challenges faced by GoJ’s public services,
2. Warrant financial expenditure in a climate of fiscal constraint.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 26
9.3.2. We suggest that GoJ define key workers as those in (1) delivering statutory services
or those akin to statutory services, where there is (2) evidenced difficulty in recruiting
and retaining staff, who have a (3) household income below a minimum threshold.
9.3.3. Each element of the definition is explored in more detail in table 9 below.
Table 9: Suggested key worker definition
Statutory or akin
to statutory services
Desktop research of other key worker definitions suggests
that statutory public sector roles are often classed as “key
workers”. Qualitative research from key government
stakeholders suggests that key worker policy currently
applies to statutory services such as nurses, teachers and
social workers. In Jersey, arms-length bodies and
charitable organisations also perform statutory services,
and this should be included in the definition.
2. Evidenced difficulty
in recruitment or
retention
Qualitative and quantitative research suggests that a
number of statutory public sector positions do not face
recruitment and retention difficulties. Intervention policies,
therefore, would not improve the delivery of statutory
services in such cases. Limiting the definition to posts
where there are difficulties ensures public spending is
justified.
3. Household income
is below a minimum
threshold
Some statutory public sector roles are remunerated at a
level that mitigates barriers to recruitment and retention.
Intervention policies, therefore, would not improve the
delivery of statutory public services in such cases. Limiting
the definition to lower income posts ensures public
spending is justified and also addresses the political
acceptability of any proposal that may be seen as a
‘housing subsidy’.
As noted in the previous section, GoJ may wish for the use
of an income threshold to be flexible and only apply to
some interventions.
9.4. Further Analysis Needed for Definition
9.4.1. For the suggested key worker definition to be adopted, Jersey will need to determine:
▪ Which roles are statutory or akin to statutory for the delivery of public services? These roles should include arms-length and charitable workers who deliver statutory services, commissioned on behalf of GoJ, or those services akin to statutory.
▪ Which roles are difficult to recruit to and retain staff in? For this to be determined (and to remain agile over time) data on long-term vacancies and staff churn will need to be maintained, which is not currently available.
▪ What should be the household income threshold? Depending on the focus of the intervention, maximum household income thresholds may be determined in
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 27
relation to median costs of living, or to housing affordability.
9.4.2. To ensure this definition functions as a set of key criteria for the application of
intervention policies, its three components should be measurable. This requires
further data gathering and benchmarking.
9.4.3. However, based on data available currently, GoJ may wish to consider the elements
set out in table 10.
Table 10: Aspects of a key worker definition
Statutory or akin to statutory services
Statutory services, are those GoJ have a legal duty to
provide, and will include sectors such as:
▪ Emergency services
▪ Education
▪ Health
▪ Social care (adults and children)
▪ Criminal justice / prisons
Evidenced difficulty in recruitment or retention
Evidence has been provided of difficulty recruiting to roles
including:
▪ STEM secondary school teachers
▪ Children’s social workers
▪ CAMHS workers
Household income is below a minimum threshold
We suggest that long-term key worker housing be
restricted to a combined household income threshold of
three times the median housing cost for a two-bedroom
property in the private rented sector (currently c. £68,000).
The government will need to maintain housing affordability
data to support this approach. Using a housing
affordability metric supports the focus on housing
embedded in this project, alternatively a cost of living
approach may be taken.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 28
Section 3: Key Worker Situation and Drivers for Change
Overview
The desire for an intervention to support the recruitment and retention of key workers,
specifically a key worker housing offer is being driven by five key factors:
1. Anecdotal evidence of barriers to both recruitment and retention of key workers (explored in more detail in the following section)
2. Long term vacancies in key public sector roles
3. The outcome of the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry, and subsequent OFSTED inspections with the identified need to stabilise the children’s workforce
4. Changing island demographics including potential increasing future demands on the health and care system due to people living longer
5. Unstable workforce in several statutory public services and high costs associated with the use of locum and agency staff
This section considers the key barriers to recruitment and retention based on primary
desktop research of public sector remuneration, Jersey policies and legislation.
Moreover, qualitative research gathered during key stakeholder interviews with key
government administration and senior Health, Education and Social Care staff, as well
as focus groups with Health, Education and Social Care key workers, have influenced
the identification of factors in the recruitment and retention of key workers.
This section provides evidence for the housing intervention policies suggested in
sections 4 and 5 of this report.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 29
Recruitment
10.1. Overview
10.1.1. Attracting employees to the key worker sector is a key challenge in maintaining the
workforce as is, and replacing those who exit to other locations, or retire. This section
considers the key push and pull factors faced by Jersey when seeking to recruit key
workers.
10.2. Recruitment Sources
10.2.1. In recruiting key workers there are four ‘pools’ of potential employees:
▪ Those already living in Jersey – who may require training to become a key worker
▪ Those living abroad who previously lived in Jersey – but may require an incentive to return
▪ Those living in the UK who have never lived in Jersey – who may require education and incentives to move
▪ Those living in other nations who have never lived in Jersey – who in addition to education and incentives, may have to manage more significant cultural or geographic barriers
10.2.2. While there are common pull factors and barriers in recruitment for these pools, some
factors may be specific to the expectations and experiences of each group. Further,
an individual’s circumstances (e.g. household composition, lifestyle preferences,
culture and values) will influence the extent to which they experience the pull factors
and barriers.
10.3. Recruitment Process
10.3.1. The government advertises key worker vacancies locally and, in the UK, including
forming partnerships with particular institutions as a source of employees, and
attending recruitment events. The government will pay travel costs for attendance at
interviews and all key worker posts benefit from a financial moving package to
incentivise those being recruited to relocate.
10.3.2. For ‘home-grown’ potential key workers funded training programmes are in place and
GoJ has just launched a new social work training programme, to target those looking
to work in Children’s Services.
10.4. Pull-Factors
10.4.1. Pull factors for key workers should be considered so that any intervention policies
acknowledge why those from off-island, and those already living in Jersey choose to
work as key workers in Jersey. We identified seven key factors:
▪ Funding for training
▪ Higher salaries
▪ Additional responsibilities
▪ Low tax regime
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 30
▪ Similar culture to the UK
▪ Moving benefits
▪ Perceived lifestyle benefits
10.4.2. Each of these factors is explored in more detail below.
10.4.3. Funding for training: For those from Jersey, the opportunity to receive funding to train
abroad is a pull-factor into certain key worker industries. Funding for training is seen
by key workers and senior management in government departments as an
opportunity to expand skill-sets and gain international experience.
10.4.4. Higher salaries: Key workers suggested that when compared to the UK equivalent of
posts, many key workers are attracted to the salaries offered in Jersey. For many,
these salaries are why they decided to move to Jersey. However, Jersey does
maintain pay comparability with the UK and is operating fiscal restraint in its public
sector pay offer, so this financial incentive may lessen over time.
10.4.5. Additional responsibilities: Some key workers described that the smaller nature of
Jerseys key worker workforce, and employers meant that they were able to take on
more seniority than they would be able to do in another jurisdiction.
10.4.6. Lower tax regime: Some key workers see a lower tax regime as an incentive to move
to Jersey, with personal income tax at a maximum of 20% and social security
contributions of 6% This compares to a system of tax bands in the UK where while
basic rate income tax is at also 20%, higher rate (for those earning over £46,351) is
40%, and national insurance contributions are at 12%.
10.4.7. Similar culture to the UK: For many key workers coming from off-island, the move to
Jersey is not perceived as “fully moving abroad”, many saw as positive that Jersey
has a similar culture to the UK and that everyone in Jersey speaks English. For some
key workers, this cultural component is comforting while still providing a sense of
change or a “new start”.
10.4.8. Moving benefits: Key workers see GoJ-provided relocation allowance of c. £8,000 as
a significant pull-factor. Most notably, individuals benefited from moving fees and
deposit assistance. For some key workers, GoJ-provided estate fees made it easier
for them to sell their home in the UK.
10.4.9. Perceived lifestyle benefits: Key workers, especially those with families or who are
advanced in their career, are clear about their attraction to Jersey’s lifestyle offer. For
these key workers, Jersey offers a slower pace of life with safety for their families, a
beach and accessible outdoor pursuits, and excellent food and dining options.
10.5. Recruitment Barriers
10.5.1. However, despite the many pull factors to the island, we also identified five critical
barriers to recruitment, that created concern or prevented people from taking up key
worker posts in Jersey. These majority of these barriers applied only to those coming
from off-island to take up roles:
▪ International skills shortages
▪ Significance of moving to Jersey
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 31
▪ Employment, health and housing
▪ Difficulties in securing accommodation prior to moving
▪ Probation period
10.5.2. Each of these factors is explored in more detail below.
10.5.3. International skills shortages: Jersey is competing with other nations, including the UK
to recruit key workers. This is particularly the case in health care, where demand for
high-quality private and public healthcare in developed economies is not met by local,
and sometimes international, supply.
10.5.4. Significance of moving to Jersey: While many key workers note the cultural benefits of
moving to Jersey, moving to Jersey is still a significant action for many. The added
difficulties of maintaining close relationships with families abroad, and the challenges
related to travel and access are all challenges that make moving to Jersey a difficult
choice for key workers.
10.5.5. Employment, health and housing status: Jersey has unique legislation related to
employment, health and housing status of adults, such as the partners of key
workers, or soon to be adults, such as the children of key workers. While sometimes
these individuals do have the rights to work freely throughout Jersey, Jersey’s small
economy may not contain positions partners or children of key workers wish to take.
10.5.6. Difficulties in securing accommodation prior to moving: While key workers see the
benefits of a two-day accommodation visit, the pace of Jersey’s rental market meant
for many key workers, the ability to secure accommodation within the two days was
nearly impossible. While some key workers were able to stay with family or friends at
the beginning of their move, many without local connections paid for additional
accommodation visits or chose a property on-line prior to moving. For key workers
looking to buy upon arrival in Jersey, a six-month probation landing period for
securing a mortgage meant they had no choice but to enter a long-term rental
agreement.
10.5.7. Probation period: The probationary period of six months for staff transferring to Jersey
is not widely advertised and many key workers were not aware of it prior to accepting
the job. However, it was mentioned by many as being seen as off-putting, and also
creating difficulties with their accommodation. For workers transferring between jobs
within the UK it is common for no probationary period to apply due to the amount of
experience they have accrued in their roles. It was noted in discussion with
stakeholders that the use of probation is discretionary, and this may be a barrier GoJ
can easily rectify.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 32
Retention
11.1. Overview
11.1.1. Once Jersey has successfully recruited a key worker it needs to ensure that key
worker stays in post to build a stable workforce for the future. This section explores
the factors influencing GoJ’s ability to retain key workers.
11.2. Exit Routes
11.2.1. Once recruited there are two exit routes for key workers on the island:
▪ To exit the profession, but remain in Jersey – this option is primarily open to those with entitled status
▪ To leave Jersey, but remain in the profession – this option may be taken by those with entitled status, but anecdotally is more often taken by those who do not have entitled status
11.2.2. Overall, we found that while many key workers wished to stay in Jersey, they were
unable to do so due to either one, or more often, a combination of ‘push factors’.
11.3. Retention Factors
11.3.1. Much like the pull-factors that originally bring key workers to Jersey, or into the key
worker profession, there are a number of factors that mean key workers are keen to
remain working in Jersey. Strengthening these areas will support the retention of key
workers in critical roles:
▪ Provision of key worker accommodation (where this is available)
▪ ‘Settling’ of family members (particularly dependents)
▪ Lifestyle benefits
▪ Reported good work-life balance
▪ Better career progression opportunities
11.3.2. Each of these factors is explored in more detail below.
11.3.3. Provision of key worker accommodation (where this is available): For those key
workers who were provided with accommodation by GoJ this was seen as a crucial
part of enabling them to remain in employment in Jersey.
11.3.4. ‘Settling’ of family members (particularly dependents): For key workers with a family,
them becoming settled on the island was important to why the key worker chose to
stay. This was particularly true with children who were seen to be at a critical stage of
their education (such as GCSEs or A-Levels).
11.3.5. Lifestyle benefits: As noted in the recruitment section above, many key workers
described positively the benefits of living on an island, where you are always close to
the beach and with a wide variety of entertainment and leisure activities.
11.3.6. Reported good work-life balance Those we spoke to also felt that they had a better
work-life balance in Jersey than they would have done working in other locations.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 33
This helped support their commitment to their roles and desire to remain on the
island.
11.3.7. Better career progression opportunities: Some key workers also felt that the relatively
small island environment gave them better opportunities to develop their career than
they would have in the UK, with the ability to take on broader roles or more
responsibility.
11.4. Push-Factors
11.4.1. However, there were a number of reasons being identified as meaning that people
were no longer willing or able to remain in Jersey. These applied only to those who
had come from off-island to take up roles:
▪ Cost of living, particularly housing affordability
▪ Housing quality
▪ Lack of preparedness to make the move to Jersey
▪ Weaknesses in the on-boarding process
▪ Lack of clarity over employment and housing policy
▪ Sense of inequity between permanent and locum / agency staff
11.4.2. Each of these factors is explored in more detail below.
11.4.3. Cost of living, particularly housing affordability: As described in section 1 Jersey has a
relatively high cost of living, and much accommodation is unaffordable. This can
make it difficult for key workers to support themselves and/or their families in Jersey.
Further population policies restrict access to affordable housing for key workers not
from the island.
11.4.4. Housing quality: The low quality of accommodation in the private leased sector was
described as a concern by many key workers, who felt it influenced their decision as
to whether or not to stay in Jersey.
11.4.5. Lack of preparedness to make the move to Jersey: Some key workers underestimate
the significance of moving to Jersey or are not prepared for the difference between
living in Jersey and their previous location, and as a result choose to leave Jersey.
11.4.6. Weaknesses in the on-boarding process: On-boarding processes varied greatly
between departments, and a coordinated centrally resourced approach has not been
developed. For new key workers without links to the island difficulties in their initial
employment experience may mean they choose to leave Jersey.
11.4.7. Lack of clarity over employment and housing policy: Many key workers were confused
about both their entitlement and the entitlement of those in their family to housing and
work. It was also reported that this confusion was mirrored by employers, making it
more difficult for family members to find work. This may in part be as there have been
a number of changes to the law recently.
11.4.8. Sense of inequity between permanent and locum / agency staff: Many key workers
felt frustrated by what they saw as a lack of equity between the higher levels of
remuneration, and the provision of accommodation to locum and agency staff, to
perform the same roles that they were undertaking.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 34
Implications of Recruitment and Retention Challenges
12.1. Overview
12.1.1. The government has identified difficulties in the recruitment and retention of key
worker staff. These difficulties have implications both in terms of the need to rely on
short-term staff and increases in the cost of recruitment.
12.2. Short Term Staffing
12.2.1. While there will always be a requirement to have locum and agency staff as part of
the workforce to provide short term cover, e.g. for sickness, the proportion of
temporary workers in Jersey is significant, and can be linked to difficulties in
recruitment and retention.
12.2.2. Short term staff have higher salary costs, and in many key worker departments have
their accommodation costs fully or partially subsidised, so are more expensive than
permanently employed staff. Short term workers often also stay in designated key
worker accommodation, meaning that it is not available for permanent staff who may
other wise benefit from these homes.
12.2.3. Further, short term staff have been identified as leading to reduced accountability and
continuity of service in some cases, with implications for workforce sustainability,
morale, quality of service delivery, and the relationships with service users.
12.2.4. As noted above the use of short-term staff leads to perceptions of inequity from
permanent staff as to the ‘preferential’ treatment of short-term staff.
12.3. Costs of Recruitment
12.3.1. Where retention fails, GoJ have to undertake multiple recruitment exercises and bear
the costs associated with this. This includes direct costs, such as:
▪ Costs of advertisement
▪ Costs of bringing people to interview
▪ Staff time in the recruitment process
▪ In addition, for key workers there are state funded relocation packages adding to the cost of recruitment.
12.3.2. Further, there are a number of indirect costs to recruiting new staff. New recruits are
likely to be initially, less efficient than exiting employees, as they do not know the
context or process of the new organisation, which will have a cost to GoJ. When a
new key worker joins new and existing employee time is used in onboarding and
training on processes and approaches, and new key workers may also have other
training requirements
12.4. Drivers for Change
12.4.1. There is therefore a direct financial benefit to recruiting staff who are a good fit to key
worker roles and putting in place a framework that enables them to stay in Jersey.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 35
Overall the desire for an intervention to support the recruitment and retention of key
workers, specifically a key worker housing offer is being driven by five key factors:
▪ Anecdotal evidence of barriers to both recruitment and retention of key workers (explored in more detail in the following section)
▪ Long term vacancies in key public sector roles
▪ The outcome of the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry, and subsequent OFSTED inspections with the identified need to stabilise the children’s workforce
▪ Changing island demographics including potential increasing future demands on the health and care system due to people living longer
▪ Unstable workforce in a number of essential public services and high costs associated with the use of locum and agency staff
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 36
Section 4: Key Worker Accommodation Options
Overview
There are a number of different approaches that GoJ could take to addressing the
provision of accommodation for key workers, including looking at different tenures
and delivery options.
This section considers the options available and assesses their suitability, feasibility
and acceptability in Jersey’s context.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 37
Introduction to Key Worker Accommodation
13.1. What is “key worker accommodation”?
13.1.1. Key worker accommodation has been used in a number of countries, most notably
the UK as a recruitment and retention strategy where high housing costs are a key
factor in key worker cost of living.
13.1.2. Jersey fits this description and a key worker accommodation scheme or schemes
could therefore form part of a recruitment and/or retention strategy. Jersey also has
additional restrictions on access to the housing market which make housing a central
concern for key workers.
13.1.3. Alternative approaches would be to review remuneration, or to review housing access
arrangements for key workers, this is explored in more detail below.
13.2. Remuneration Review
13.2.1. A remuneration led approach to key workers would focus on ensuring key workers
were paid sufficiently to afford the housing on offer in Jersey.
13.2.2. However, at a time of public sector pay constraint, and in the context of both equal
pay for equal value and pay comparability with the local and UK market, higher
remuneration may be politically and financially difficult for GoJ to implement.
13.2.3. Further, this is likely to be costlier to GoJ than an accommodation led solution, as
wages spent on accommodation costs is effectively ‘lost’ into the private sector,
whereas in a government led key worker solution this value may be retained.
13.3. Review of Housing Access
13.3.1. For Jersey, a key worker solution could look at reviewing housing access for key
workers without developing any further key worker accommodation measures.
13.3.2. However, housing affordability is a problem across the island, not just for
accommodation currently available to key workers, and it is not clear that increased
housing access would improve housing affordability. Therefore, allowing key workers
access to social rent property will reduce the supply available to other groups in need
and any review of housing access is likely to be politically sensitive.
13.4. Key Worker Housing Solution
13.4.1. Given the difficulties of reviewing key worker remuneration of housing access, a key
worker housing solution is an appropriate approach that can be taken to addressing
the recruitment and retention factors based on housing quality, availability and
affordability. This section considers approaches that have been used elsewhere and
analyse a number of options for how Jersey could provide key worker
accommodation.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 38
13.5. Global Approaches
13.5.1. Despite similarities between nations in the drivers for key worker housing offers,
different approaches have developed, with some focussing on supporting ownership,
while others look to providing a rental offer. This is summarised in table 11 below.
Table 11: International approaches to key worker accommodation
United Kingdom
Guernsey New
Zealand Australia USA
Market Rental ● ● ● ● ●
Discounted Market Rental (e.g. affordable / social rent)
● ● ● ●
Discounted Home Ownership
● ● ●
Rent to Buy ●
Shared Ownership / Shared Equity
● ● ●
Block Leasing ●
13.5.2. More detailed case studies of approaches can be found in Appendix 5.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 39
Options for Key Worker Accommodation
14.1. Overview
14.1.1. Based on the needs of GoJ, we have developed a number of options which take into
account the tenure to be offered, and how the accommodation could be delivered.
14.2. Options
14.2.1. The government could offer key-workers one of four tenures:
▪ Short-term leasing
▪ Long-term leasing
▪ Part-ownership
▪ Full-ownership
14.2.2. With housing being delivered through:
▪ Development or refurbishment
▪ Block leasing
▪ Private sector subsidy
14.2.3. There is potential overlap between tenures in the delivery mechanisms, as illustrated
in figure 12 below.
Figure 12: Options for a key worker housing solution
14.2.4. Each of these options is described in more detail in the following sections, with an
analysis of the suitability, feasibility and acceptability (SFA) of the option, and a
description of the financial implications.
14.2.5. While each option is considered discretely for the purposes of analysis, none of the
options outlined are exclusive and a combination of delivery routes could be
implemented. A ‘hybrid solution’ would give key workers more choice and may suit
different households at different times in their lives and careers. However, the more
options pursued, the more complex the system will be to deliver and administer.
14.3. Financial Testing
14.3.1. To test the financial viability of each of the options at a high level, we have modelled a
single two-bedroom unit, over a 30-year cashflow. This helps make a basic
assessment of any subsidy likely to be required to support each option. A full list of
the assumptions used in our financial modelling is provided in Appendix 4.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 40
14.4. Suitability, Feasibility and Acceptability (SFA) Analysis
14.4.1. For each of the options we have worked with government stakeholders to complete
an SFA analysis. In an SFA analysis each option is given a score from 1 – 10 (with 10
being high) for its suitability, feasibility and acceptability, as shown in table 13.
Table 13: SFA analysis
Factor Description Scoring
Suitability ▪ To what extent does the option meet the
requirements of GoJ from a solution? 1 - 10
Feasibility
▪ Is the option financially viable?
▪ How simple or complex would the option be to implement?
1 – 10
Acceptability ▪ How acceptable is the option to key stakeholders e.g.
Ministers, residents, and the key worker group? 1 – 10
14.4.2. Together this gives an overall score out of 30 for each option and allows each of the
different options to be easily compared.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 41
Affordable Leasing
15.1. Overview
15.1.1. This section explores the approaches that GoJ could take to providing leased key
worker housing, and the implications of these approaches.
15.2. Leased accommodation
15.2.1. Leased accommodation provides greater flexibility than ownership for residents, but
therefore may be seen as less of a commitment to the island, and not support
retention as well as ownership might.
15.2.2. For GoJ, a leasing programme would allow stock to be re-used for multiple key
workers as required. However, there are ongoing management and maintenance
responsibilities (and costs) for leased accommodation.
15.2.3. To professionalise and standardise the leasing offer we suggest all leased
accommodation should be managed by a Social Housing Provider, rather than GoJ
itself. This also will prevent concerns relating to accommodation linked to employment
being a barrier to whistle blowing.
15.2.4. Accommodation could be leased to key workers on either a short-term or long-term
basis.
15.3. Short-term Leasing Offer: ‘Landing Accommodation’
15.3.1. ‘Landing accommodation’ could be offered to all key workers arriving from outside of
Jersey (regardless of salary), for the first 6 – 9 months of their time in Jersey.
15.3.2. This accommodation would overcome the uncertainty of the 6-month probation period
and would, also mean households will pass the 6-month residency period required to
purchase a home in Jersey. During their time in short-term accommodation
households new to Jersey would have time to identify alternative accommodation,
whether in the private sector or a different key worker housing offer.
15.3.3. The rental rate for the landing accommodation could be set at either market rent or at
90% of market rent, and the rent level paid may be means tested (e.g. key workers
with incomes below the threshold pay 90% of market rent, while other key workers
pay the full rent). The best approach to rent should be considered during the next,
more detailed design phase.
15.3.4. The offer of landing accommodation may also reduce need for an accommodation
visit. However, for it to be successful there would always need to be landing
accommodation available for new recruits, which may lead to a higher void rate than
for other types of leasing offer. The higher void rates may mean it is less financially
viable to offer a discounted rental rate, compared to the longer-term leasing where
there are likely to be lower void costs.
15.4. Long-term Leasing Offer
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 42
15.4.1. Longer leases could also be offered to key workers with a household income below
the designated threshold, at the social rent rate. This could be made available to all
key workers (whether from Jersey or elsewhere) and support these key workers for as
long as their circumstances required it.
15.4.2. The leases should be for a sufficient term to provide security to the key worker
household, but also end regularly enough to allow for a review of circumstances, with
households no longer meeting the qualifying criteria asked to leave. We suggest a
term of four years would balance these two considerations.
15.4.3. The long-term leasing scheme could be administered through the existing housing
gateway although it is likely it would operate as a separate brand so as not to create
tension with those seeking affordable rental housing through the gateway.
15.4.4. Overall, a long-term leasing offer could provide stability to key workers, enabling them
to meet their housing costs, and may also support them to save for a deposit to move
into home ownership at a later point in their careers.
15.5. Delivery routes
15.5.1. Leased accommodation could be delivered through:
▪ Development of new homes or refurbishment property
▪ Block leasing
▪ Providing a private sector subsidy (long-term leasing only)
15.5.2. These are explored in more detail below.
15.5.3. Development or refurbishment: New homes could be built, or existing accommodation
refurbished and then the properties could be made available to lease by key workers.
15.5.4. Block leasing: The government could take on long-term leases from the private
market and lease these to key workers (as either short term or long-term
accommodation). The leases are likely to be for blocks but could be individual
properties or groups of properties. The government may be able to negotiate to
reduce rental price with the head landlord as a customer leasing in block, and as they
would mitigate void risk, and could take on repairing and maintenance
responsibilities.
15.5.5. Private sector subsidy: The government could provide a rental subsidy to key
workers, or to their landlords to ‘top-up’ rent payments for those leasing on the private
market.
15.6. Financial Implications
15.6.1. An illustration of the financial performance of a single two-bedroom unit under each
option is provided in table 14 below. In calculating the landing accommodation
performance, we have included savings made by the accommodation visit not being
required and modelled landing accommodation at the full market rent rates.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 43
Table 14: Illustrative financial performance of the leasing options
OPTION Initial
capital investment
NPV (30
years)
IRR (30
years)
Net operating income per unit (year 1)*
Net operating income per unit (year 6)*
Housing cost as %
of household
income
Household income level at
which this would
represent 30% of
housing costs
Develop leased accommodation for long-term letting
244,570 587 5.6% (844) 1,623 16% 46,280
Develop leased accommodation for short-term ‘landing’ letting
244,570 (23,538) 4.8% (1,964) 260 18% 51,422
Block lease private accommodation for long-term letting
0 (65,342) n/a (3,034) (3,692) 16% 46,280
Block lease private accommodation short-term ‘landing’ letting
0 (88,902) n/a (4,129) (5,023) 18% 51,422
Private market rental subsidy
0 (51,601) n/a (2,456) (2,764) 24% 67,680
* after interest charges, for build schemes
15.6.2. None of the options have a positive year 1 cashflow, however developing long-term
leased accommodation pays back over the life of the plan with a positive NPV. Short-
term leasing has a negative NPV due to assumed higher void rates and refurbishment
costs, however this may be able to be mitigated by also using the accommodation for
agency or locum staff when it is not required as ‘landing accommodation’.
15.6.3. The block leasing always requires subsidy, as rental income is assumed to be
insufficient to cover the market rent due to the head landlord and the ongoing
management and maintenance costs of the property.
15.6.4. A private sector subsidy scheme will have a cost as there is no asset, and it is purely
revenue expenditure.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 44
15.7. SFA Analysis: Short-Term Leasing
15.7.1. The suitability, feasibility and acceptability of short-term leasing for each of the identified delivery routes has been assessed with key
stakeholders from the Government of Jersey, and is summarised in table 25, below. It is not possible to provide short-term landing
accommodation through private sector subsidy, so this delivery route has not been considered
Table 15: SFA analysis of short-term leasing
All delivery options
Su
ita
bilit
y
▪ Would form part of a recruitment offer, and address concerns relating to the initial move to Jersey for key workers.
▪ However, it does not address long-term retention challenges
▪ Government of Jersey would be required to take on management obligations, and would have to manage high levels of tenancy turnover
Score: 6
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Long lead in time may mean that a solution cannot be implemented quickly
▪ Government would have control of the offer, and could build the type of accommodation it identified was needed
Score: 6
Blo
ck lease
▪ Would be able to react quickly to need and be flexible in the size of the accommodation portfolio
▪ But there may be a limited pool of property available
Score: 6
Fea
sib
ilit
y
▪ The approach is similar to the accommodation already managed
▪ Allocations could be relatively straightforward to manage using existing systems
▪ There is likely to be a financial cost to GoJ of a short-term scheme due to higher void levels
▪ Costs may be partially offset by replacing the accommodation visit (assuming key workers will secure alternative housing while living in landed accommodation)
Score:8
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Government are already developing and refurbishing properties and have the expertise and a financing approach in place
▪ In this approach GoJ would hold the development risk
Score: 8
Blo
ck lease
▪ Dependent on the availability of blocks to lease in the market, but these have previously been available
▪ This approach is would come at a cost to the State
Score: 7
Ac
ce
pta
bilit
y
▪ Would be popular among newly-landed key workers who have experienced difficulty finding accommodation in the private sector
▪ Would not be popular among existing key workers (from off and on island) if not implemented in conjunction with non-temporary provisions
▪ As a short-term solution this approach is unlikely to encounter public hostility, particularly if the rent is at market levels
Score:8
Develo
pm
ent
/ R
efu
rb
▪ May be open to the accusation that delivery comes at the expense of affordable housing for islanders
Score: 6
Blo
ck lease
▪ The cost to GoJ inherent in this approach, and lack of control may be unpopular
Score: 5
Total score: 22 Development / Refurb: 20
Block Leasing: 18
15.7.2. Overall short-term leasing through either development and/or refurbishment, or through block leasing was seen to be viable options to
be taken forward.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 45
15.8. SFA Analysis: Long-Term Leasing
15.8.1. The suitability, feasibility and acceptability of long-term leasing for each of the identified delivery routes has been assessed with key
stakeholders from the Government of Jersey, and is summarised in table 16, below.
Table 16: SFA analysis of long-term leasing
All delivery options
Su
ita
bilit
y
▪ Would provide a flexible long-term accommodation solution to support key workers to stay on the island
▪ Would provide security of tenure, and long-term stability to key workers and their households
▪ Could be an offer that attracts people to either the key worker sector or to Jersey
▪ At 90% of the market it may still be unaffordable for some key workers
Score: 9
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Long lead in time may mean that a solution cannot be implemented quickly
▪ Government would have control of the offer, and could build the type of accommodation it identified was needed
Score: 9
Blo
ck lease
▪ Shorter lead in time to begin program
▪ Would be able to react quickly to need and be flexible in the size of the accommodation portfolio
▪ But there may be a limited pool of property available
Score: 8
Private
secto
r
▪ Key workers would have flexibility and the option to choose their own accommodation
▪ Would not address low quality standards or limited housing availability in the private market.
Score: 5
Fea
sib
ilit
y
▪ Could be administered through the existing housing gateway to reduce set-up and administration
▪ Would require clear processes for determining eligibility and assessing ongoing qualification for the scheme or regular review
▪ Would draw on the existing social housing model and expertise on the island
Score: 9
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Government are already developing and refurbishing properties and have the expertise and a financing approach in place
▪ In this approach GoJ would hold the development risk
Score: 8
Blo
ck lease
▪ Dependent on the availability of blocks to lease in the market, but these have previously been available
▪ This approach is would come at a cost to the State
Score: 7
Private
secto
r
▪ This option would be very easy to implement and require little government involvement
▪ However, there would be a direct revenue cost to GoJ
Score: 6
Ac
ce
pta
bilit
y
▪ This approach may be seen as taking accommodation away from other people in need who would otherwise have accessed it through the Gateway
▪ Regular reviews of eligibility may allay concerns by ensuring that only those who fit the key worker criteria access the housing
▪ Would be very popular for key workers who have expressed concerns over current leasing arrangements
Score: 7
Develo
pm
ent
/ R
efu
rb
▪ May be open to the accusation that delivery comes at the expense of affordable housing for islanders
Score: 6
Blo
ck lease
▪ The cost to GoJ inherent in this approach, and lack of control may be unpopular
Score: 5
Private
secto
r ▪ Would likely act to inflate the private sector market where demand is already high and make it more difficult for non-key workers looking to rent
Score: 2
Score: 25 Development / Refurb: 23
Block leasing: 20
Private sector subsidy: 13
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 46
15.8.2. Overall long-term leasing through either development and/or refurbishment, or through block leasing were seen to be viable options to
be taken forward, however private sector subsidy scored so poorly on acceptability as to mean it should not be pursued.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 47
Affordable Ownership
16.1. Overview
16.1.1. This section explores the approaches that GoJ could take to providing a route to
home ownership for key workers, and the implications of these approaches.
16.2. Home Ownership
16.2.1. Home ownership for most people represents a long-term commitment to a place, and
as such would support the long-term retention of key workers in Jersey. It is also the
tenure many key workers would have (and may have previously had) if living in the
UK and fits with a cultural desire in the UK and Jersey to own your own home.
16.2.2. For GoJ, a full-ownership model there would be no ongoing management, although
depending on the approach there may be some management responsibilities in a part
ownership scheme.
16.3. Partial Ownership Approaches
16.3.1. Andium currently offers a partial ownership product through ‘Andium HomeBuy’ for
first time buyers where properties are sold at a discount, and the discount is retained
on the home in perpetuity, so it is always kept as an affordable unit.
16.3.2. Alternatively, a model similar to the UK’s ‘shared ownership’ product with a key
worker buying a proportion of the property and paying rent on the unowned share
could be introduced. However, feasibility testing of a new partial ownership approach
would need discussions with mortgage providers in Jersey, as the mortgagability of
shared ownership was initially a challenge in the UK and given Jersey’s small
mortgage market may represent a significant hurdle.
16.3.3. A partial ownership approach would reduce the amount of deposit and borrowing
required by a key worker making it more affordable for them to purchase a home.
16.4. Full Ownership
16.4.1. The government could also make full ownership of a property affordable either
through providing a deposit that the key worker would otherwise be unable to save or
through reducing the overall cost of the property (e.g. selling at a discount). Other
options for delivering full ownership include providing affordable mortgage finance or
a ‘rent to buy model’
16.4.2. Under this approach the key worker would own their home outright and be able to sell
it on the open market.
16.5. Delivery Routes
16.5.1. A full or partial ownership offer delivered through:
▪ Development of new homes or refurbishment property
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 48
▪ Providing a private sector subsidy to support purchase
16.5.2. These are explored in more detail below.
16.5.3. Development or refurbishment: New homes could be built, or existing accommodation
refurbished and then the properties could be made available to buy (or part-buy) by
key workers.
16.5.4. Private sector subsidy: The government could provide a subsidy to key workers to
purchase properties on the open market, either just for new build properties (to
provide an incentive to developers) or for all properties on the market
16.6. Financial Implications
16.6.1. An illustration of the financial performance of a single two-bedroom unit under each
option is provided in table 17 below.
Table 17: Illustrative financial performance of the ownership options
OPTION Initial capital
investment
NPV (30 years)
IRR (30
years)
Net operating income per unit (year 1)*
Net operating income per unit (year 6)*
Housing cost as %
of household
income
Household income level at
which this would
represent 30% of
housing costs
Shared equity with rent due (Partial ownership)
330,121 4,349 6.0% (9,620) (8,323) 21% 59,813
Discounted Sale (Partial ownership) _
244,570 15,491 n/a 0 0 19% 51,481
Equity loan (Full ownership)
82,400 (37,834) n/a 0 1,090 24% 67,093
* after interest charges, for build schemes
16.6.2. Partial ownership options require a significant upfront capital investment, as it is
assumed in the modelling that these are developed by GoJ, whereas an equity loan
requires less investment.
16.6.3. Both approaches to partial ownership have a positive NPV and depending on the
price point of the sale could be delivered without subsidy.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 49
16.7. SFA Analysis: Partial Ownership
16.7.1. The suitability, feasibility and acceptability of partial ownership for the two of the identified delivery routes has been assessed with key
stakeholders from the Government of Jersey, and is summarised in table 18, below.
Table 18: SFA analysis of partial ownership
All delivery options
Su
ita
bilit
y
▪ Would be an attractive recruitment offer to key workers
▪ Would support key workers to feel that they had a stake in the island and be less likely to leave
▪ Would provide long-term stability and security
▪ A partial ownership offer may not be considered as good as full ownership
Score: 9
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Long lead in time may mean that a solution cannot be implemented quickly
▪ Government would have control of the offer, and could build the type of accommodation it identified was needed
Score: 9
Private
Secto
r ▪ Could be implemented immediately
▪ Offers the greatest choice and flexibility to key workers
Score: 9
Fea
sib
ilit
y
▪ Could mirror existing partial ownership schemes that are delivered on behalf of GoJ for first time buyers
▪ If homes are discounted in perpetuity, they could recycle through the scheme
▪ May struggle to offer sufficient scale to make a significant difference to key workers
Score: 7
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Depending on the level of discount could be delivered without subsidy
▪ Government maintain ownership over a portion of the assets developed
Score: 7
Private
Secto
r
▪ Would offer the most choice and flexibility to key workers
▪ Depending on the model may require subsidy
Score: 6
Ac
ce
pta
bilit
y
▪ May be seen as inequitable by ineligible part of the population seeking home ownership
▪ Would be very attractive to key workers
▪ The retention of a discount in perpetuity may make the scheme more acceptable as it will have more beneficiaries
Score: 4
Develo
pm
e
nt / R
efu
rb
▪ May be accused of taking social housing provider stock away from other groups in need
Score: 4
Private
Secto
r
▪ Would likely act to inflate the private sector market where demand is already high and make it more difficult for non-key workers looking to purchase
Score: 2
Total Score: 20 Development / Refurbishment: 20
Private Sector Subsidy: 17
16.7.2. As with long-term leasing overall, the likely market distorting effect of a private sector subsidy means that this is not a viable option,
however the delivery of a partial ownership solution through development and/or refurbishment was considered worth exploring further.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 50
16.8. SFA Analysis: Full Ownership
16.8.1. The suitability, feasibility and acceptability of approaches to supporting full-ownership for each of the identified delivery routes has been
assessed with key stakeholders from the Government of Jersey, and is summarised in table 19, below.
Table 19: SFA analysis of full ownership
All delivery options
Su
ita
bilit
y
▪ Would be an attractive recruitment offer to key workers
▪ Would support key workers to feel that they had a stake in the island and be less likely to leave
▪ Would provide long-term stability and security
Score: 10
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Long lead in time may mean that a solution cannot be implemented quickly
▪ Government would have control of the offer, and could build the type of accommodation it identified was needed
▪ Government may be able to use sale to cross-subsidise other delivery
▪ Single time solution with a loss of the asset for the future
Score: 8
Private
Secto
r ▪ Could be implemented immediately
▪ Offers the greatest choice and flexibility to key workers
Score: 9
Fea
sib
ilit
y
▪ Depending on the model taken it is likely that a discounted ownership scheme would be financially viable
▪ However, there is no comparable offer on the island and it may be complex to set-up and administer
Score: 6
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ Depending on the level of discount could be delivered without subsidy
▪ Providers on the island have development experience and could deliver homes for purchase
▪ No long-term income stream created
Score: 6
Private
Secto
r
▪ Would offer the most choice and flexibility to key workers
▪ Would be easy to implement as it relies on existing stock, or stock already being built by private developers
▪ Depending on the model may require subsidy
Score: 6
Ac
ce
pta
bilit
y
▪ Would likely be seen as inequitable by ineligible part of the population seeking home ownership, particularly as there is not a comparable scheme for non-key worker groups
▪ Would be very attractive to key workers
Score: 2
Develo
pm
ent /
Refu
rb
▪ May be accused of taking stock away from other groups in need
▪ Likely politically unpopular due to no comparable scheme on offer to islanders
Score: 2
Private
Secto
r
▪ May be seen as unfair as if it increases key workers ability to purchase property relative to islanders
▪ Would likely act to inflate the private sector market where demand is already high and make it more difficult for non-key workers looking to purchase
▪ Doesn’t address wider issues of housing supply
Score: 1
Total Score: 18 Development / Refurbishment: 16
Private Sector Subsidy: 16
16.8.2. Overall, it was felt the acceptability of a full ownership scheme scored too poorly in terms of acceptability for this option to be taken
forward.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 51
Section 5: Recommendations
Overview
Based on the options analysis carried out in section 4 we have developed an outline
approach that Jersey could take forward to deliver a key worker housing solution.
This model is outlined in the following sections.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 52
Options Appraisal
17.1. Overview
17.1.1. This section summarises the outcome of the SFA assessment to identify those approaches which should be taken forward as
part of a hybrid solution to deliver a key worker accommodation offer.
17.2. SFA Summary
Table 20: Summary of SFA for key worker options
Short-term leased
‘landing
accommodation’
Long-term leased accommodation Partial ownership Full ownership
Development
/ refurb
Block
leasing
Development
/ refurb
Block
leasing
Private
sector
Development
/ refurb
Private
sector
Development
/ refurb
Private
sector
Suitability 6 6 9 8 5 9 9 8 9
Feasibility 8 7 8 7 6 7 6 6 6
Acceptability 6 5 6 5 2 4 2 2 1
Total: 20 18 23 20 13 20 17 16 16
Rank =2 5 1 =2 9 =2 6 =7 =7
17.2.1. For all options the assessed acceptability to stakeholders is weak, with no options scoring higher than 6. This is as all key worker
interventions may be seen to benefit a particular group of people, many of whom come from off-island at the expense of
islanders.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 53
17.2.2. In all cases private sector delivery also scores poorly, as it came at a cost to GoJ and
was likely to have market distorting effects that would be unacceptable to local
residents.
17.2.3. For the leasing options, the relative financial cost of block leasing compared to a
development or refurbishment approach means it has scored less highly on feasibility,
however despite this block leasing would likely be able to be implemented more
quickly than development / refurbishment.
17.2.4. Overall, the options to be taken forward are:
▪ Short-term leased ‘landing’ accommodation (Development / Refurbishment led, with block leasing as required)
▪ Long-term leased accommodation (Development / Refurbishment led, with block leasing as required)
▪ Partial ownership (through Development / Refurbishment)
17.2.5. These three options and how they may work together are explored in more detail in
the following section.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 54
Suggested Approach
18.1. Overview
18.1.1. To flexibly address the needs of key workers across the whole of their careers on the
island, and to encourage recruitment and support long-term retention a solution that
encompasses a range of accommodation offers is proposed. This is explored in more
detail in this section.
18.2. A Hybrid Approach
18.2.1. None of the options outlined in the previous section are exclusive and a combination
of offers has been identified as being the best approach to meeting the varied
requirements of key workers. More options will give key workers more choice, and
may suit different households at different times in their lives and careers
18.2.2. However, the more options pursued, the more complex the system will be to deliver
and administer, and GoJ will need to manage this additional complexity. To support
this, as much as possible each scheme should be similar in terms of the mechanisms
by which it is allocated, so as to reduce potential confusion.
18.3. Example Key Worker Journey
18.3.1. Figure 21 below highlights the different routes a key worker may take in and out of the
different accommodation options throughout their career.
Figure 21: Key worker journey
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 55
18.3.2. Throughout their career, as their circumstances change key workers are likely to
move between different types of key worker accommodation and accommodation in
the private sector, whether leased or owned.
18.4. Administering the System
18.4.1. While it is for GoJ to determine how best to administer the key worker housing offer,
an easy solution may be to operate through the existing housing gateway, although it
is likely that GoJ would want to use different branding, to separate out clearly the key
worker offer, from the island wide affordable housing offer. In addition, it is possible
that a separate band under the Affordable Housing Gateway banding system would
need to be established specifically for key workers.
18.5. Short-Term Leased ‘landing’ Accommodation
18.5.1. While the nature of the offer will need further refinement and testing, we suggest that
the key features of this accommodation are likely to be:
▪ Available to key workers of any income: as it is not let below the market rate, and all key workers struggle with initial accommodation regardless of income
▪ Term of tenancy of 6 – 9 months: to allow time for key workers to settle but to ensure the accommodation remains a temporary solution
▪ Rent at the market rate: so that the accommodation is not financially more attractive than other options (such as renting in the private sector)
▪ Furnished or option of furniture packages: as key workers may arrive without furniture
18.6. Long-Tern Leased Accommodation
18.6.1. For long-term leased accommodation, we suggest that the offer should be:
▪ A maximum income threshold to be applied: so that the scheme is targeted at those in need.
▪ Tenancy term of 3 or 4 years: to balance the need to provide security of tenure with the need to keep the circumstances and eligibility of households under review
▪ Rent at the social rent rate (currently 90% of market): So that key workers receive a more affordable rent, but do not benefit more than other groups on the island.
18.7. Partial Ownership
18.7.1. The partial ownership offer will need to be developed in more detail to ensure it is
financially viable for GoJ, and that it does not create legacy difficulties (for example in
administering the discount in perpetuity provisions), however we suggest key features
should be:
▪ A maximum income threshold to be applied: so that the scheme is targeted at those in need.
▪ Discount to be applied in perpetuity: so that when a key worker household moves on into alternative accommodation the discount home can help another key worker household
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 56
18.8. Delivery
18.8.1. All of the options would be primarily provided through the development or
refurbishment of homes on the behalf of GoJ. However, the leasing offers could also
be provided through block leasing to enable greater responsiveness and flexibility.
Any block leasing would need to be balanced against the likely cost of this delivery
route.
18.9. Demand Analysis
18.9.1. All of the options presented (i.e. landed, long-term leased and partial ownership) were
described in our qualitative research by key worker as attractive accommodation
offers. Key workers are particularly interested in affordable leased housing, however
some key workers, usually those in later stages of their career are attracted to a home
ownership option. Therefore, for our initial demand analysis we have assumed, that
uptake for key worker housing will be high across all options.
18.9.2. The demand analysis is based on approximate assumed uptake of the three options
using high level recruitment and budget data for: secondary school teachers, allied
health professionals, nurses and midwives and doctors and consultants. It should be
noted that lack of historic vacancy figures, family structure and income data and
housing data for present and future key workers means that the demand analysis is
an estimate, which will require further refinement work at a later stage. While this
means that the numbers provided are a rough base estimate, we felt it important that
an estimate be provided at this stage to frame discussions. We recommend further
demand analysis be completed once criteria for eligibility are established and further
data is available.
18.9.3. Table 22 includes figures for all budgeted key workers who are assumed to be eligible
for each relevant housing option, based on an income threshold of £68,000. The
table shows an estimated total figure of eligible budgeted staff numbers.
Table 22: Demand Analysis of Three Housing Options
Demand Analysis Estimated Eligible
Households Assumed Uptake
Landed Accommodation20
(Demand in 9-month recruitment period) 90 81 homes
Leased Accommodation 604
363 homes
Partial Ownership Accommodation 121 homes
Total 694 565 homes
20 Assumed no income threshold for eligibility and a recruitment rate ratio to budgeted positions of 5%, and a 75% off-island recruitment rate in all Health, Social Services and Education departments in a 9-month period.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 57
18.9.4. Overall, our estimates indicate substantial potential demand for a key worker product,
however this may be reduced by restricting eligibility criteria (e.g. reducing the
number of roles to which the scheme applies or changing the income thresholds).
18.10. Unit Type
18.10.1. While we have not reviewed data on key worker household composition, the last
Jersey census (2011) included information on family structure for the general
population of Jersey (excluding pensioners). Assuming that the composition of key
worker households is broadly similar to that of the rest of the island, the unit mix of
the 565 units would need to be split between one-bedroom, and family size (two or
three- bedroom) homes as set out in table 23, below.
Table 23: Unit mix required for key worker accommodation based on census data
Unit Type Proportion Homes
One-Bedroom 37% 209
Two-Bedroom or Three-Bedroom 63% 356
Total 565 Homes
18.10.2. It should be noted that the younger ager group likely to qualify for key worker housing,
may often be at the earlier stages of their career and therefore have a higher
requirement for family sized accommodation. Many of the key workers we spoke to
indicated that they required two- or three- bedroom accommodation.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 58
Financial Implications
19.1. Overview
19.1.1. We have developed a high-level financial model that considered the provision of all
three types of accommodation:
▪ Landing accommodation
▪ Long-term leased accommodating
▪ Partial ownership
19.1.2. The financial modelling assumptions are provided in Appendix 4.
19.2. Financial Model
19.2.1. We modelled a mixed key worker offer, with delivery staggered over three years from
2020 – 2022, to allow for development time, as set out in table 24, below.
Table 24: Assumed delivery of Key Worker Accommodation
Unit type 2020 2021 2022 Total
Develop leased (rental) accommodation for
long-term letting 40 40 40 120
Develop leased (rental) accommodation for
temporary "landing" letting 16 17 17 50
Partial Ownership 10 10 10 30
Totals 66 67 67 200
19.2.2. We also considered financial performance if the units were acquired under a block
leasing arrangement rather than developed by GoJ. As block leasing represents an
ongoing cost to GoJ, it performs poorly over a business plan period (figure 25), and
we have not considered in further detail the financial performance of the block leasing
delivery approach.
Figure 25: Annual Surplus for Block Leasing and Development approaches
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29
An
nu
al
Su
rplu
s
Years
ANNUAL SURPLUS
Build to rent option Lease to rent option
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 59
19.3. Business Plan Performance Dashboard
19.3.1. We assessed business plan performance over a 30-year cashflow, for operating the
three recommended key worker offers, based on a development or refurbishment
delivery model. This model does not include the development financing and
development period but runs from when the first properties are assumed to be
operational in 2020.
19.3.2. Over the life of the plan there is an operating surplus generated each year, however
in years 3 – 10 interest cover is less than 110%. The overall debt performance, and
key financial ratios for the plan are shown in table 26.
Table 26: Business plan debt and financial ratios
Net Peak debt £m
Peak debt year
Year net debt
repaid
Min Interest Cover (target >120%)
Max Gearing (target <
50%)
Min EBITDA
MRI (SHL)
interest cover
Max Debt per unit
£43m 2023 2048 102% 100% 91% £215,600
19.3.3. The charts below show performance against key lending covenants across the life of
the business plan.
Figure 27: Interest Cover
Figure 28: Debt per Unit
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
150%
170%
190%
210%
230%
250%
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29
Inte
rest
Co
ver
Rati
o %
Years
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Deb
t £ p
er
Un
it
Years
Years
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 60
Figure 29: Net Debt
Figure 30: Operating Costs per Unit excluding inflation
19.3.4. The debt is high at the beginning of the business plan to finance the acquisition of the
units and then reduces through the life of the plan as the income generated by the
units is used to pay off the debt.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29
To
tal
Lo
an
Deb
t
Years
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Co
st
£ p
er
Un
it
Years
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 61
Recommendations and Next Steps
20.1. Recommendations
20.1.1. Based on the findings of this report we recommend that GoJ:
▪ adopt the key worker definition: ‘those in (1) delivering statutory services or those akin to statutory services, where there is (2) evidenced difficulty in recruiting and retaining staff, who have a (3) household income is below a minimum threshold.
▪ review employment practices, such as the use of probations and other non-accommodation barriers to recruitment and retention which it has control over
▪ develops key worker accommodation provision made up of three offers:
Short-term ‘landing’ accommodation for new arrivals
Long-term leased accommodation
Partial ownership
20.2. Next Steps
20.2.1. To implement the recommendation GoJ, need to:
1. Agree how the minimum income threshold will be calculated to inform further key worker accommodation research.
2. Obtain or collect more detailed data on skills shortages, and vacancies to evidence those roles that will fit within the key worker definition, and to more detailed inform demand analysis.
3. Undertake more detailed financial modelling to establish the likely level of subsidy required to deliver the scheme, but also to quantify likely savings in recruitment costs and the use of short-term staff.
4. Consult more widely on the proposed approach to further test the suggested offer with stakeholders, and potentially key workers as the target market.
5. Seek approval of the newly formed Housing Policy Development Board and incorporate the approach into relevant strategic documents.
6. Make any required changes in legislation to facilitate the delivery of the key worker accommodation solution.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 62
Document Review List
# Document requested Document received
1 Structure charts showing housing, planning, and social care functions in the government.
Final structure chart with appointments 13/09/2018
2 Current housing and planning strategies – adopted or developing
2016 Jersey Housing Strategy
3 Current affordable housing policies including any grant or low-cost borrowing provided by the government for affordable housing
Social Housing Eligibility Criteria
Datasheet: 2018 08 15 All FH & Flying FH Residential Units
4 Current salary structures for occupations in the potential definition for key worker housing
https://www.gov.je/Working/WorkingForTheStates/Pages/CivilServicePayscales.aspx
5 Any special relationship information for immigration between Jersey and other countries inside and outside of the EU (i.e. immigration rules for EU and non-EU countries, including the United Kingdom after Britain’s departure from the EU)
https://www.gov.je/lifeevents/movingtojersey/Pages/index.aspx
6 Current figures for other living costs across Jersey (i.e. transport, essential goods, leisure, etc)
https://www.gov.je/Government/JerseyInFigures/Pages/index.aspx
7 Any current housing and economic policies for key workers, even if they are not by the name “key worker” but within them contain mention of key industries (i.e. tourism)
Application for Rent Abatement Form 20160819
https://www.gov.je/news/2018/pages/NewHomesForKeyworkers.aspx
8 Land availability and land costs for private developers and government, or government-owned land holdings that may be used for housing (particularly around places of business related to key worker housing) and if the land has been zoned for development or been granted planning permission
Completions 1986-2020 (est)
Viability Assessment for review of Developer Contributions (May 2017) Report
Viability Assessment (May 2017) Appendices
9 Government releases on issues related to key workers including the recruitment and retention of any key personnel in any particular industries
20180718 New Improvement Plan for
Children and Young People
SoJ Improvement Plan for Children's
Services
20180724 New Social Work Degree
Course
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 63
# Document requested Document received
20180906 EMBARGOED News Release
Government Pledge to Children in Jersey
FINAL
Jersey Care Commission
Putting Children First The Pledge
September 2018.doc
10 Policies on immigration (including the rules for visa status)
JSY Immigration Rules 01.01.18.
WORK PERMITS GUIDANCE 301017
11 Information relating to staffing for
potential key worker industries, including:
▪ Total people employed
▪ Number of vacancies
▪ Average time to fill vacancies
▪ Staff turnover
▪ Staff satisfaction / survey results
Copy of Key Worker and Vacancy
Analysis - August 2018
One Voice Surveys (Education and
Health and Social Services)
12 Tenure split in Jersey (owner occupied,
PRS and social housing) and further
tenure splits with social housing (forms of
rental and low-cost home ownership
schemes, etc)
2011 Census Chapter 3: Households and
housing
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 64
Interviewees and Focus Groups
Job Title
Group Director for Financial Strategy
Principal Surveyor - Estates Management
Chief Executive for Government of Jersey
HR Business Partner for Health and Community Services
Head of Communications and Specialised Services - Andium Homes
Director Education Department
Director of Planning
Welcome Jersey Programme Manager
Chief Nurse
HR Operations Manager
Minister for Children and Housing
Director Environmental Health
HR Business Partner for Education and Children's Services
Director of Children’s Services
Housing Control Manager, Population Office
Director General of Strategic Policy & Connétable Len Norman, Minister for Home Affairs
Secondary school teachers & lecturers
Nurses and Health Staff
Children’s social workers and CAMHS professionals
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 65
Affordability Calculations
Key
Monthly Housing Costs are more than
50% of earnings
Monthly Housing Costs are more than
30% and less than or equal to 50% of
earnings
Monthly Housing Costs are less than or
equal to 30% of earnings
Single Earner Affordability
Housing Affordability Calculations (Single Earner)
Mortgages Rent
1BR Flat
2BR Flat
2BR House
3BR House
4BR House 1BR 2BR 3BR 4-5BR
Nurses and Midwives
Gross Salary Monthly Salary £996 £1,590 £1,706 £2,188 £3,407 £1,200 £1,750 £2,375 £2,483
Grade 1 £25,673 £2,139 47% 74% 80% 102% 159% 56% 82% 111% 116%
Grade 2 £29,523 £2,460 40% 65% 69% 89% 138% 49% 71% 97% 101%
Grade 3 £33,622 £2,802 36% 57% 61% 78% 122% 43% 62% 85% 89%
Grade 4 £39,995 £3,333 30% 48% 51% 66% 102% 36% 53% 71% 75%
Grade 5 £46,550 £3,879 26% 41% 44% 56% 88% 31% 45% 61% 64%
Grade 6 £54,283 £4,524 22% 35% 38% 48% 75% 27% 39% 53% 55%
Grade 7 £59,346 £4,946 20% 32% 34% 44% 69% 24% 35% 48% 50%
Grade 8 £71,582 £5,965 17% 27% 29% 37% 57% 20% 29% 40% 42%
Teachers Pay Average Monthly Salary
unqualified £31,019 £2,585 39% 62% 66% 85% 132% 46% 68% 92% 96%
Grade 1 £34,578 £2,882 35% 55% 59% 76% 118% 42% 61% 82% 86%
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 66
Housing Affordability Calculations (Single Earner)
Mortgages Rent
1BR Flat
2BR Flat
2BR House
3BR House
4BR House 1BR 2BR 3BR 4-5BR
Grade 2 £36,819 £3,068 32% 52% 56% 71% 111% 39% 57% 77% 81%
Grade 3 £39,062 £3,255 31% 49% 52% 67% 105% 37% 54% 73% 76%
Grade 4 £40,206 £3,351 30% 47% 51% 65% 102% 36% 52% 71% 74%
Grade 5 £41,357 £3,446 29% 46% 50% 63% 99% 35% 51% 69% 72%
Grade 6 £42,509 £3,542 28% 45% 48% 62% 96% 34% 49% 67% 70%
Grade 7 £43,658 £3,638 27% 44% 47% 60% 94% 33% 48% 65% 68%
Grade 8 £44,805 £3,734 27% 43% 46% 59% 91% 32% 47% 64% 67%
Grade 9 £45,956 £3,830 26% 42% 45% 57% 89% 31% 46% 62% 65%
U1 £47,088 £3,924 25% 41% 43% 56% 87% 31% 45% 61% 63%
U2 £48,073 £4,006 25% 40% 43% 55% 85% 30% 44% 59% 62%
U3 £49,051 £4,088 24% 39% 42% 54% 83% 29% 43% 58% 61%
U4 £50,036 £4,170 24% 38% 41% 52% 82% 29% 42% 57% 60%
U5 £51,017 £4,251 23% 37% 40% 51% 80% 28% 41% 56% 58%
Junior Doctors Pay Average Monthly Salary
F1 £28,192 £2,349 42% 68% 73% 93% 145% 51% 74% 101% 106%
F2 £32,936 £2,745 36% 58% 62% 80% 124% 44% 64% 87% 90%
Specialty £37,350 £3,113 32% 51% 55% 70% 109% 39% 56% 76% 80% Residential Childcare
Officers, Youth Service, Family
Support Workers
Pay Average Monthly Salary
A £20,761 £1,730 58% 92% 99% 126% 197% 69% 101% 137% 144%
B £25,744 £2,145 46% 74% 80% 102% 159% 56% 82% 111% 116%
C £31,225 £2,602 38% 61% 66% 84% 131% 46% 67% 91% 95%
D £36,671 £3,056 33% 52% 56% 72% 111% 39% 57% 78% 81%
E £43,117 £3,593 28% 44% 47% 61% 95% 33% 49% 66% 69%
F £49,829 £4,152 24% 38% 41% 53% 82% 29% 42% 57% 60%
G £57,201 £4,767 21% 33% 36% 46% 71% 25% 37% 50% 52%
H £64,799 £5,400 18% 29% 32% 41% 63% 22% 32% 44% 46%
I £73,289 £6,107 16% 26% 28% 36% 56% 20% 29% 39% 41%
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 67
Housing Affordability Calculations (Single Earner)
Mortgages Rent
1BR Flat
2BR Flat
2BR House
3BR House
4BR House 1BR 2BR 3BR 4-5BR
J £84,557 £7,046 14% 23% 24% 31% 48% 17% 25% 34% 35%
Dual Earner Affordability
Housing Affordability Calculations (2 Earners) Mortgages Rent
1BR Flat
2BR Flat
2BR House
3BR House
4BR House 1BR 2BR 3BR 4-5BR
Nurses and Midwives
Pay Average Monthly Salary
(x2) £996 £1,590 £1,706 £2,188 £3,407 £1,200 £1,750 £2,375 £2,483
Grade 1 £51,345 £4,279 23% 37% 40% 51% 80% 28% 41% 56% 58%
Grade 2 £59,046 £4,921 20% 32% 35% 44% 69% 24% 36% 48% 50%
Grade 3 £67,244 £5,604 18% 28% 30% 39% 61% 21% 31% 42% 44%
Grade 4 £79,989 £6,666 15% 24% 26% 33% 51% 18% 26% 36% 37%
Grade 5 £93,100 £7,758 13% 20% 22% 28% 44% 15% 23% 31% 32%
Grade 6 £108,565 £9,047 11% 18% 19% 24% 38% 13% 19% 26% 27%
Grade 7 £118,692 £9,891 10% 16% 17% 22% 34% 12% 18% 24% 25%
Grade 8 £143,163 £11,930 8% 13% 14% 18% 29% 10% 15% 20% 21%
Teachers Pay Average Monthly Salary
(x2)
unqualified £62,038 £5,170 19% 31% 33% 42% 66% 23% 34% 46% 48%
Grade 1 £69,156 £5,763 17% 28% 30% 38% 59% 21% 30% 41% 43%
Grade 2 £73,638 £6,137 16% 26% 28% 36% 56% 20% 29% 39% 40%
Grade 3 £78,124 £6,510 15% 24% 26% 34% 52% 18% 27% 36% 38%
Grade 4 £80,412 £6,701 15% 24% 25% 33% 51% 18% 26% 35% 37%
Grade 5 £82,714 £6,893 14% 23% 25% 32% 49% 17% 25% 34% 36%
Grade 6 £85,018 £7,085 14% 22% 24% 31% 48% 17% 25% 34% 35%
Grade 7 £87,316 £7,276 14% 22% 23% 30% 47% 16% 24% 33% 34%
Grade 8 £89,610 £7,468 13% 21% 23% 29% 46% 16% 23% 32% 33%
Grade 9 £91,912 £7,659 13% 21% 22% 29% 44% 16% 23% 31% 32%
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 68
Housing Affordability Calculations (2 Earners) Mortgages Rent
1BR Flat
2BR Flat
2BR House
3BR House
4BR House 1BR 2BR 3BR 4-5BR
Nurses and Midwives
Pay Average Monthly Salary
(x2) £996 £1,590 £1,706 £2,188 £3,407 £1,200 £1,750 £2,375 £2,483
U1 £94,176 £7,848 13% 20% 22% 28% 43% 15% 22% 30% 32%
U2 £96,146 £8,012 12% 20% 21% 27% 43% 15% 22% 30% 31%
U3 £98,102 £8,175 12% 19% 21% 27% 42% 15% 21% 29% 30%
U4 £100,072 £8,339 12% 19% 20% 26% 41% 14% 21% 28% 30%
U5 £102,034 £8,503 12% 19% 20% 26% 40% 14% 21% 28% 29%
Junior Doctors Pay Average Monthly Salary
(x2)
F1 £56,384 £4,699 21% 34% 36% 47% 73% 26% 37% 51% 53%
F2 £65,872 £5,489 18% 29% 31% 40% 62% 22% 32% 43% 45%
Specialty £74,700 £6,225 16% 26% 27% 35% 55% 19% 28% 38% 40% Residential Childcare
Officers, Youth Service, Family
Support Workers
Pay Average Monthly Salary
(x2)
A £41,522 £3,460 29% 46% 49% 63% 98% 35% 51% 69% 72%
B £51,487 £4,291 23% 37% 40% 51% 79% 28% 41% 55% 58%
C £62,450 £5,204 19% 31% 33% 42% 65% 23% 34% 46% 48%
D £73,342 £6,112 16% 26% 28% 36% 56% 20% 29% 39% 41%
E £86,233 £7,186 14% 22% 24% 30% 47% 17% 24% 33% 35%
F £99,657 £8,305 12% 19% 21% 26% 41% 14% 21% 29% 30%
G £114,401 £9,533 10% 17% 18% 23% 36% 13% 18% 25% 26%
H £129,597 £10,800 9% 15% 16% 20% 32% 11% 16% 22% 23%
I £146,577 £12,215 8% 13% 14% 18% 28% 10% 14% 19% 20%
J £169,113 £14,093 7% 11% 12% 16% 24% 9% 12% 17% 18%
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 69
Financial Assumptions
The assumptions used for the illustrative financial modelling of each options are provided in
the table below.
Table 31: Assumptions for illustrative modelling of options
States of Jersey
Key Worker Housing - Option Assumptions Summary
Leased
(build to
rent)
Temporary
Lease
(build to
rent)
Block lease
private
accomm
Temporary
Block lease
Partial
Ownership
Market rent - 2 bed flat £pcm 1,286 1,286 1,286 1,286
Affordable rent set at % of market rent 90% 100% 90% 100%
Sub-market rent charged £pcm 1,157 1,286 1,157 1,286
Occupancy rate 100% 80% 100% 80%
Annual rent received 13,884 12,341 13,884 12,341
Less: Costs % of rent
Rent paid to landlords (14,655) (14,655)
Management costs 5.00% (694) (771) (694) (771)
Additional overhead - property sourcing team 0 0
Total repair costs 8.50% (1,180) (1,311) (1,180) (1,311)
Repair costs passed on to landlords 236 262
Furniture package (300) (300)
Accommodation visit costs saved 1,000 1,000
Bad debts & voids 1.50% (208) (231) (208) (231)
Service costs 3.00% (417) (463) (417) (463)
Total Costs (2,499) (2,077) (16,918) (16,470) 0
Operating Surplus 11,385 10,265 (3,034) (4,129)
Interest on borrowing (12,229) (12,229)
Operating Deficit in year 1 (844) (1,964) (3,034) (4,129)
Total Development Cost per unit (244,570) (244,570) (244,570)
Lease Premium 0 0
Total Open Market Value per unit 350,000
Equity purchased% 1
Purchase price 262,500
Less: legal fees (2,000)
(Borrowing requirement)/cash surplus (244,570) (244,570) 0 0 15,930
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 70
The assumptions used in the 30-year business plan for a mixed model (e.g. implementing
landing accommodation, long-term leasing and partial ownership) are provided in the table
below.
Table 32: Base assumptions for financial modelling
Base Assumptions
Rent increase 4.00% to 3.05%
Average Interest Rate 5.00%
RPI 3.3% to 2.3%
Real Inflation Rate 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Earnings Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Lease Charges Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Management Charge Income Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Repairs And Maintenance Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Building Costs Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Land Costs Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
Real Property Inflation 0.70% to 0.75%
In addition, we assumed:
Development costs per 2 bed unit: £225k plus development period interest of £11k giving a
total unit cost of £236k.
Open market value for the 2 bed flats: £360k with a 75% share being sold under the ‘partial
ownership’ model.
Market rent per month to £1,286 (to match Andium’s rents for 2 bed properties based on
90% of that figure.)
Operating costs: 18% of rent (5% management, 8.5% repairs, 1.5% voids, and 3% for
service costs). (Based on Andium assumptions)
RPI assumption used for cost and rent inflation: 3.3% until 2025 and 2.3% from 2026.
Rent increases: 4% per year until 2025 (based on 3.3% RPI + 0.75% with a 4% cap) and
3.15% from 2026 (based on 2.3% RPI +0.75%).
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 71
Best Practice Case Studies
Metropolitan Thames Valley, UK Housing Association: Surrey Key Worker Accommodation
There are 24 properties in the Surrey Metropolitan Thames Valley key worker scheme:
▪ 6x one-bedroom flats,
▪ 4 x one-bedroom houses,
▪ 3 x two-bedroom maisonettes,
▪ 6 x three-bedroom houses,
▪ 5 x four-bedroom houses
The homes are dispersed in the local area, near to two Surrey hospitals. Properties are let
unfurnished. Staff from the two local hospitals and the regions primary care trust are eligible
to be allocated the homes which are let at a discounted market rent, with rent paid via payroll
deductions for NHS Trust employees
UK Government: Help to Buy – Shared Ownership Scheme
A general shared ownership product targeting a wider group of people has replaced a
specific key worker product (under the Keyworker Living Programme) that existed from 2004
– 2014. However, in many areas key workers receive priority for allocations of housing.
Properties are provided by housing associations and developers across the country,
including under planning obligations relating to affordable housing. The homes are available
to first time buyers, with a household income less than £80,000 pa (£90,000 pa in London)
Under the scheme individuals purchase a share of their home (usually between 25% and
75%) and pay rent on the rest of the property. The rent is set at 2.75% of the value and is
increased annually by CPI+1%. Residents have the option to purchase further shares in the
property up to 100%.
Chicago: Public Safety Officer Home Buyer Assistance Program
In 2017 Chicago launched a three-year pilot providing loans to first responders to allow them
to purchase properties in designated target areas. The loans can be used to purchase any
single-family or two-unit home available on the open market. In target areas. Once
purchased the first responder must live in the property for at least ten years.
To qualify for the scheme participants must be City of Chicago non-probationary, full-time,
sworn first responders (police officers, fire officers and paramedics) with an income no more
than 150% of the area median income, which is varied for household size.
The loan received is a $30,000, 10 year, no interest, forgivable loan to purchase their
primary residence.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 72
New South Wales, Australia: teacher Housing Services
Teachers in rural and remote areas are able to apply for rental accommodation provided by
the government, in their area of work. A rental subsidy scheme is also in operation where
property is not available to let to the teachers.
The properties are a mix of unfurnished houses and furnished ‘villa’ units. New schemes
have included ‘flexible’ units that can be converted between two- and four-bedroom
apartments.
In terms of allocating the units, teachers receive priority, then support staff, and other
education staff. Priority is given to full time over part time staff.
The properties are let at market rent, with rent paid via payroll deductions. Rental subsidies
are offered for teachers at certain schools.
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 73
Technical Annex: Housing Demand Analysis
Introduction
This annex sets out how the housing demand analysis for key worker housing
accommodation was calculated. As noted in the report the exact eligibility group for any key
worker scheme has yet to be defined. Further there is a paucity of data on historic vacancy
rates. This means that the demand analysis can at this stage only be an estimate and further
analysis should be undertaken as the project progresses to the detailed design stage.
Base Data
To calculate estimated demand figures, we drew on the following data sources provided by
GoJ:
▪ Key Worker and Vacancy Analysis – August 2018
▪ Education Teacher Recruitment Analysis - 2012 - 2017 – SUMMARY
▪ 2011 Census – Chapter 3 – Households and housing
Approach
Landed Accommodation:
Assumptions:
▪ 5% vacancy rate over a 9-month period (based on Education figures)
▪ 75% of recruitment from off island
▪ Total uptake assumed at 90%
▪ Total budgeted Education and Health & Social Services roles: 2,209
▪ Landing accommodation requirement of 81 properties
Long-term Accommodation (Leased and Partial Ownership)
Eligibility assumptions:
▪ Household income threshold of £68,000
▪ Budget figures for Allied Health, Doctors and Consultants, Nurses and Midwives, and
Teachers and Lecturers posts to establish post numbers and income levels.
▪ Assumed all households where one key worker earns less than half of the threshold
(£34,000) and half of key workers with an income between £34,000 and £68,000
have an overall household income below the threshold
▪ Assumed 35% of secondary school teachers would be key workers
Government of Jersey Key Worker Housing Project – Final Report
Page | 74
▪ Total of 604 eligible posts (172 Allied Health, 40 Doctors and Consultants, 353
Nurses and Midwives, 38 Teachers)
Leased assumptions:
▪ Assumed 60% uptake from eligible key workers
▪ Leased accommodation requirement of 363 homes
Ownership assumptions:
▪ Assumed 20% uptake of eligible key workers (noting that deposit requirements may
make this scheme inaccessible for many key workers)
▪ Partial ownership accommodation requirement of 121 homes