key decision points in effectively managing disputes

11
19/03/2015 1 Key decision points in effectively managing disputes Gitanjali Bajaj & Kirk Simmons DLA Piper 19 March 2015 Introduction This session will outline the key decision points for the effective management of disputes during the following stages: Stage 1: Drafting the dispute resolution ("DR") clause in your contract Stage 2: When a dispute first manifests itself Stage 3: When formal proceedings are commenced Stage 4: When formal proceedings are well underway Stage 5: Hearing Stage 6: Settlement Stage 7: When the final decision is delivered In-House Counsel Day 2015 2

Upload: others

Post on 25-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

1

Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

Gitanjali Bajaj & Kirk Simmons

DLA Piper

19 March 2015

Introduction

This session will outline the key decision points for the effective management of disputes during the following stages:

Stage 1: Drafting the dispute resolution ("DR") clause in your contract

Stage 2: When a dispute first manifests itself

Stage 3: When formal proceedings are commenced

Stage 4: When formal proceedings are well underway

Stage 5: Hearing

Stage 6: Settlement

Stage 7: When the final decision is delivered

In-House Counsel Day 2015 2

Page 2: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

2

Key Decision Points – Stage 1

DRAFTING THE DR CLAUSE IN YOUR

CONTRACT

In-House Counsel Day 2015 3

1. Drafting the DR clause in your contract

Hypothetical Co Pty Ltd ("Hypothetical") and Theoretisch Co GMBH ("Theoretisch") are negotiating a contract for the supply of widgets.

The in-house legal team at Hypothetical is asked for legal advice about the dispute resolution clause proposed by Theoretisch:

"1. All disputes arising out of the performance of the contract, and during the term of this contract, shall be submitted in accordance with clause 2 below.

2. If either party informs the other of a potential dispute, the parties must negotiate with a view to resolving the dispute. If the negotiations fail, either party may refer the dispute to expert determination in accordance with clause 2.1 or either party may refer the matter to mediation. If either party informs the other that it is dissatisfied with the expert determination, the dispute may be referred to arbitration in accordance with clause 2.2."

What do we think about this DR clause?

In-House Counsel Day 2015 4

Page 3: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

3

Hypothetical could counter with the following clause:1. If a dispute arises from or in connection with this contract, a party to the contract must notcommence court proceedings in relation to the dispute unless the party has participated in amediation in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this clause. This paragraph does apply toan application for urgent interlocutory relief.

2. A party to this contract claiming that a dispute has arisen from the contract must give writtennotice specifying the dispute to the other party (or parties) to the contract. Within 28 days ofservice of a notice, senior representatives from the parties must negotiate in good faith with aview to resolving the dispute.

3. If the dispute has not been resolved within 28 days after the date of the notice of dispute,either party may refer the dispute to mediation in accordance with clause X at the Institute ofArbitrators and Mediators Australia ("IAMA") using the IAMA mediation rules in force as at thedate of the dispute.

The words highlighted in green are important – why?

What other matters should Hypothetical have considered?

Hope for the best but plan for the worst

In-House Counsel Day 2015 5

1. Drafting the DR clause in your contract

Key Decision Points – Stage 2

WHEN A DISPUTE FIRST MANIFESTS ITSELF

In-House Counsel Day 2015 6

Page 4: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

4

2. When a dispute first manifests itself

Theoretisch receives a customer complaint about awidget.

Theoretisch contacts Hypothetical by telephone andalleges that the widgets supplied by Hypothetical arefaulty and that Hypothetical is in breach of the Contract.

This allegation is raised immediately with in-house legal.

What should we do?

In-House Counsel Day 2015 7

2. When a dispute first manifests itself

Review the DR Clause

Understand the key issues in dispute and revisit the best/most appropriate forum in which to have the matter resolved

Ensure that you satisfy any mandatory negotiations/mediation process before proceedings are formally commenced

Take such mandatory steps seriously with a genuine attempt to resolve the dispute

Early case evaluation

Early assessment of witnesses

What else?

In-House Counsel Day 2015 8

Page 5: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

5

2. When a dispute first manifests itself

Choose the right legal team!

Do you need external counsel?

Critical assessment of the law firm/lawyer's experience and track record

Don’t be afraid to ask to speak to other clients when testing a lawyer out

Be wary of the generalist "I can do it all" lawyer

Drill down to specifics when asking questions of your lawyer's experience

For the right case (usually high value), get a second opinion on the early case evaluation.

For the right case (e.g. bet the company litigation) set up a devil's advocate legal team.

Even consider mix and match the best from different law firms (controversial but potentially on the rise)

Do you need a law firm, or are you better off briefing counsel direct?

In-House Counsel Day 2015 9

Key Decision Points – Stage 3

WHEN FORMAL PROCEEDINGS ARE

COMMENCED

In-House Counsel Day 2015 10

Page 6: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

6

3. When formal proceedings are

commenced

Theoretisch serves Hypothetical with a Statement of Claim.

In-House Counsel Day 2015 11

3. When formal proceedings are

commenced

Key Decisions/Considerations

Is the dispute in the correct forum?

Do you need to apply for any emergency relief?

Cost/benefit analysis of continuing the formal proceedings

What else?

In-House Counsel Day 2015 12

Page 7: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

7

Key Decision Points – Stage 4

WHEN FORMAL PROCEEDINGS ARE

UNDERWAY

In-House Counsel Day 2015 13

4. When formal proceedings are well

underway

Key Decisions/Considerations:

Evaluate the case as it evolves

Stay involved with the formal proceedings e.g. directions

Discovery considerations

Lay evidence preparation

Expert evidence preparation

Protection of Costs

Trial management

In-House Counsel Day 2015 14

Page 8: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

8

Key Decision Points – Stage 5

HEARING

In-House Counsel Day 2015 15

5. Hearing

Parties should agree to the key issues early

Court bundle

Opening statements

Aide (e.g. schedule of admissions / concessions)

Cross-examination

Schedule of issues linked to cross-examination

Questions from the Bench

In-House Counsel Day 2015 16

Page 9: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

9

Key Decision Points – Stage 6

SETTLEMENT

In-House Counsel Day 2015 17

6. Settlement

In managing disputes, you need to ask in each case, "are we there yet?" when it comes to resolving a claim

The key is knowing when to ask the question

At each stage ask yourself: "will the settlement odds change prior to the next stage (and why)?"

In-House Counsel Day 2015 18

Page 10: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

10

Key Decision Points – Stage 7

WHEN THE FINAL DECISION IS DELIVERED

In-House Counsel Day 2015 19

7. When the final decision is delivered

The Court hands down judgment in favour of Hypothetical. What else is there to do?

Get a written opinion on the meaning and effect of the decision

Does the decision resolve all the issues?

What will be the approach to unresolved issues?

Are any urgent preservation orders necessary?

Can the decision be appealed? Note time limits

Review your effort to protect costs

Calderbank letter / Offer of Compromise

Is there a basis to argue indemnity costs?

Manage cost recovery efficiently.

In-House Counsel Day 2015 20

Page 11: Key decision points in effectively managing disputes

19/03/2015

11

Key Contacts

In-House Counsel Day 2015 21

Gitanjali Bajaj

Partner

T: 02 9286 8440

E: [email protected]

Kirk Simmons

Senior Associate

T: 02 9286 8111

E: [email protected]