kevin vandergriff. prior probability in terms of simplicity christian theism specified naturalism...
TRANSCRIPT
Kevin Vandergriff
Prior Probability in Terms of Simplicity
Christian TheismSpecified Naturalism (Hypothesis of Indifference)
1 - A maximally powerful
2 - Intelligent
3 - And Good
4 - Supernatural Person
5 - Created the universe
6 - For the purpose revealed by Jesus of Nazareth
1 - The universe may or may not be factually necessary.2 - No maximally evil supernatural person or persons exist.3 - No maximally good supernatural person or persons exist.4 - The universe doesn’t exist for a purpose. 5 - The condition of conscious beings on Earth (animals) is not the result of maximally good or maximally evil persons. 6 - The condition of self-conscious beings (humans) is not the result of maximally good or maximally evil persons.
Generic Naturalism
Definition: The physical world explains why anything mental exists.
This definition doesn’t have enough content
Mr. Lowder needs the Hypothesis of Indifference!
Christian theism is roughly equal in simplicity with Specified Naturalism
God Exists Necessarily
Two Facts Imply This:1-The Origin of the Universe2-The Existence of the Something Rather than Nothing
The Origin of the Universe Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem shows
that all matter, space, and time had an absolute beginning
Shuttlecock
Universe has to have an efficient cause Metaphysical time can precede
physical time without contradiction Effects can be simultaneous with their
causes
Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?
Key Premise: Everything that exists, has an explanation of it’s existence, either in the necessity of it’s own nature, or in an external cause
c
Even if the universe is eternal, it requires an external cause
Does Physical Matter Support Naturalism?
No; God’s Goodness entails the existence of a value-generating universe
Does a Hostile Universe Support Naturalism? No; The rest of the universe is
physically necessary for Earth, and life on Earth to exist
Too many interventions implies a less than Perfect God
Does Evolution Support Naturalism? No; Evolution happened too quickly to be unguided
Life on Earth, appears as early as physically possible
Evolution may have been God’s only option
Does Pain and Pleasure Support Naturalism?
No; Evolution is Metaphysically Necessary Laws of Nature are Metaphysically
Necessary
Does Languishing and Flourishing Support Naturalism? No; Evolution is Metaphysically
Necessary Laws of Nature are Metaphysically
Necessary
Does Pain and Pleasure Support Naturalism? Desire satisfaction alone doesn’t
explain objective flourishing (Darwin’s Thought Experiment)
Theism Explains why Pain and Pleasure PREDOMINANTLY Contribute to Human Flourishing and Survival and Reproduction!
Does Languishing and Flourishing Support Naturalism? Animals aren’t self-aware
Animals that aren’t persons, don’t have a right to life
Does Triumph and Tragedy Support Naturalism?
No; Look around! Tragedies aren’t the rule in our world
Life is worthwhile Evolution would be blind to all of God’s morally
sufficient reasons for allowing evil in the world Humans didn’t have to be resilient in the face
of tragedies on naturalism We are hard-wired to find meaning, purpose
and comfort in the face of tragedies Divine Comfort should be case by case
Does Mind-Brain Dependence Support Naturalism? No; it is logically impossible to create
another being with a soul that can perform actions
How do you get consciousness from non-conscious matter on naturalism?
Moral responsibility doesn’t require libertarian free will
Does Ethical Disagreement Support Naturalism?No; God’s reasons would be the same as oursMorality is Independent of GodSome moral issues are inherently indeterminateWe have room to grow
Does Divine Hiddenness Support Naturalism? No; The Absence of Evidence isn’t
necessarily evidence of absence. Is there non-resistant non-belief? Do you need to have awareness of
the other person(s) required for meaningful relationship?
Mr. Lowder’s Case for Naturalism5 Independent Arguments
3 Dependent Arguments
EvolutionEvolution Hostile Universe Mind-Brain
Dependence Tragedy and Triumph Ethical Disagreement
Divine Hiddenness Pain and Pleasure Not
Always Morally Necessary
Languishing and Flourishing
*One Unconfirmed Prediction: An eternal and uncaused universe exists.
Alleged Understated Evidence
So much of our universe is intelligible without any appeal to supernatural agency.
So much of the universe is hostile to life Embodied moral agents are the result of
evolution The only known moral agents are embodied Our universe is not teeming with embodied
moral agents, including agents much more impressive than humans
Variety and frequency of conditions that severely limit our freedom
Moral responsibility requires libertarian free will
Kevin’s Case for Christian TheismGod is the Best Explanation of:
1-The Origin of the Universe1-The Origin of the Universe
2-Why Something Rather than Nothing Exists2-Why Something Rather than Nothing Exists
3-The Formational Economy of the Universe3-The Formational Economy of the Universe
4-The Connection Between Moral Beliefs and 4-The Connection Between Moral Beliefs and Necessary Moral TruthsNecessary Moral Truths
5-The Connection Between Necessary Moral 5-The Connection Between Necessary Moral Truths and FlourishingTruths and Flourishing
6-The Existence of Self-Awareness6-The Existence of Self-Awareness
7-The Worthwhileness of Life7-The Worthwhileness of Life