“keeping it fresh: the challenge of an old subject (anatomy), middle aged professors, and young...
TRANSCRIPT
“Keeping It Fresh: The Challenge of An Old Subject (Anatomy), Middle
Aged Professors, and Young Students”
Disclaimer: We are only speaking from our own experience, and don’t presume that our experiences would apply to other courses
Old Subject :Anatomy
• Tell me, is there anything NEW in Anatomy?– Subtext=?? (you must be so bored)
• How do you manage to maintain interest in teaching it after SO very many years?– Subtext=?? (you must be so boring)
Conroy family tally
33 years of teaching (67 Conroy-years)
2008 is our 26th year here at WUSM
- will put us over the 4000 student- mark
Why do we continue to find it stimulating?
Three elements:– The discipline itself and its intrinsic importance
– The environment• Students• Administration (OMSE)• Our Department head very supportive
– Our superb colleagues• 5 of us in the course ALL THE TIME.
Despite the implication (and occasionally voiced opinion) that Anatomy is a moribund field, the
centrality of anatomical knowledge to medical education is widely
acknowledged
Postgraduate Residency Program Survey : adequacy of Gross Anatomy preparation
• Diagnostic Radiology 84% (172/204)
• General Surgery 84% (224/266)
• Emergency Medicine 83% (93/112)
• Family Practice 71% (312/440)
Clinical Anatomy 12:55-65 (1999)
Anatomy Curriculum hours. Survey comparing 1991 and 1997
The average number of curriculum hours assigned to gross anatomy (national data)
1991 …………………. 190 hours
1997 …………………..165 hours
WUMS hours for Gross Anatomy 140 hours
So- the Challenges• COURSE = It’s long
– 40 lectures (10/40 are given by clinical faculty)– 3 exams (these take a lot of time…more later)– 100 lab contact hours
• FACULTY : The WAY we teach
• Aggressively interactive use of lab time: provocative,probing teaching style
• Liberal use of demonstrations in lab and lecture• MUCH direct engagement and interaction with students• Four month intense experience for students and faculty • “Three-ring circus”
• Who will be the next generation of teachers?
• Exams
Paradoxically, a feature of teaching Anatomy that might appear to make it unattractive (ie amount of time) results in faculty feeling highly connected to and invested in the course
Old Subject :Anatomy
• So, IS there anything NEW in Anatomy?– Human variation means that there’s always something new
to be learned– it takes DECADES to produce a really knowledgeable anatomist
– New visualization methods- explosion of IMAGING techniques emphasizing anatomical structures
– Cadaver is window into medical progress over the last three decades: new procedures; much new to be learned
• How do we manage to maintain interest in teaching it after so many years?
• Immediacy of satisfaction: We SEE students’ progress– THEIR AWE over seeing a human heart, brain etc…
• BEYOND ANATOMY: introducing students to the beginning of a life-long exposure to issues concerning professionalism
Most important is a sense of CONSTANT LEARNING
• students and faculty
• clinical faculty introduce new perspectives:
– 10 superb clinical lecturers– Radiology residents presenting conferences
– Surgeons come to lab
• advances in surgical techniques are seen in the dissection lab
Middle Aged Professors and Young Students
How should we be teaching?
How they learn (we think)
– Primacy of electronic media and computer-based learning methods
visual and interactive– Animations
– Weblinks and images
– Flashcards
But…..Our observations
– Despite students’ facility, familiarity, and appreciation of interactive, IT features , they explicitly comment positively on the value of face-to-face interactions (teachers at the dissecting table), lab demonstrations and socratic, interactive, visually engaging lecturing
(duct-tape, CHALK-BOARD coloring-in sessions– and even……
powerpoints?????)
*Course evaluations for other courses often voice similar opinions
Keeping it fresh???
• Pleasure in students’ progress
• Clear sense of expanding one’s own knowledge base
• Refine knowledge by learning material through different prisms (3D anatomy, developmental biology)
• Camaraderie ……….we have FUN
• But………..it IS exhausting……
Are we offering any prescriptions?
• Nothing more than our experiences, which might/might not be applicable—
– More time!!!! (sure………..)
– ****Demonstrations and interaction
• We continually reflect on the course and make year-to-year adjustments
Our course is always a work in progress
• Current focus of attention
Exams
– The amount of faculty time they take– Their value to students– The sense that there might be a better way to get at what
we need to know
• In the face of limited course time, do exams represent time taken away from learning?