kate negotiable instruments law real

Upload: catherine-cayda-dela-cruz-benjamin

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    1/32

    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW

    X. PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT Presentment

    It is defined as:a. the production of a bill of exchange to the drawee for his acceptance, or to

    the drawee or acceptor for payment; orb. the production of a promissory note to the party liable for its payment.

    (Windham Bank v. Norton, 22 comm. 213, 56 am. Dec. 297).

    It consists of:a. a personal demand for payment at a proper placeb. the bill or note must be ready to be exhibited if required and surrendered upon

    payment.

    A. NECESSITY OF PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT

    Where necessary

    Presentment for payment is necessary in order to charge the drawer andendorsers.(Sec. 70, NIL). Without presentment, the persons secondarily liable aredischarged.

    For Promissory Notes: it is necessary that: Presentment for payment must bemade to the person primarily liable (Sec. 71, NIL);

    -If the note is dishonored by nonpaYment, notice of dishonor by nonpayment

    must be given to the person secondarily liable (Sec. 80, NIL), unless excused

    In All Other Cases: it is necessary that- Protest for nonpayment by drawee is necessary to charge an acceptor for

    honor(Sec. 167, NIL);- Protest for nonpayment by the acceptor for honor is also required. (Sec. 170,

    NIL).

    Where NOT necessary

    General rule:

    Presentment for payment is not necessary to charge persons primarily liable onthe instrument. (the person primarily liable on the instrument is the person who bythe terms of the instrument is absolutely required to pay the same under Section192). This pertains to the maker of a promissory note and the acceptor of a bill ofexchange.

    Note: if instrument is, by its terms, payable at a special place and the personprimarily liable is able and willing to pay it there at maturity, such ability andwillingness are equivalent to tender of payment on his part. (Sec. 70 NIL). This

    pertains to a situation where the instrument is payable at a particular institution oroffice, such as a bank and not when the instrument is payable in a certain locality.

    Presentment for Payment is Necessary to charge persons secondarily liable

    Exception:

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    2/32

    a. to charge the person primarily liable on the instrument (Sec. 70, NIL)

    b. to charge the drawerwhere he has no right to expect or require that the draweeor acceptor will pay the instrument. (Sec. 79, NIL)

    c. to charge an indorser where the instrument was made or accepted for hisaccommodation and he has no reason to expect that the instrument will be paid ifpresented. (Sec. 80, NIL)

    Under Section 79 and 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, only thedrawer or indorser are not discharged. All other parties secondarilyliable are discharged

    d. Excused (Sec. 82, NIL):1) Where, after the exercise of reasonable diligence, presentment cannot be

    made;

    2) Where the drawee is a fictitious person;3) By waiver of presentment, express or implied.

    e. when a bill is dishonored by nonacceptance immediate right to recourseaccrues to holder(Sec. 151, NIL)

    f. in case of waiver of protest, whether in the case of a foreign bill of exchange orother NI deemed to be a waiver not only of a formal protest but also ofpresentment and notice of dishonor. (Sec. 111, NIL)

    When Presentment Must Be Made

    1. Instrument on a Fixed or Determinable Future Time/ Not payable ondemand Presentment must be made on the day it falls due. Presentmentbefore maturity is improper.

    (a) Every negotiable instrument is payable at the time fixed therein without grace(Sec. 85, NIL).

    (b) When the day of maturity falls upon a Sunday or a holiday, the instrument ispayable on the next succeeding business day (Sec. 85, NIL).

    (c) When the day of maturity is on a Saturday, presentment for payment shall bemade on the next succeeding business day; except that demand instrumentmay, at the option of the holder, be presented for payment before 12:00oclock noon on Saturday when that entire day is not a holiday (Sec. 85, NIL).

    (d) Where the instrument is payable at a fixed period after date, after sight, orafter the happening of a specified event, the time of payment is determined byexcluding the day from which the time is to begin to run, and by including thedate of payment. (Sec. 86, NIL).

    Illustration:

    18 June 2001

    10 days after date Pay A or order P500.(Sgd.) B

    Present this on 28 June 2001 for payment because that is its due date

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    3/32

    GENERAL RULE: Presentment for payment must be made on due date ofinstrument

    EXCEPTION: If the due date falls on a Saturday, present instrument on

    Monday next

    REASON: Obligor is entitled to the full day to make payment. But sinceSaturday is half day work and the banks would be closed in the afternoon,and the following day is a Sunday, he should have until Monday to pay. Thelaw wants to give the person primarily liable one whole day to look for money.

    EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION: If the instrument is payable on demand, theinstrument can be presented on a aturday. The reason is that the holdercould have presented it on any day.

    2. Instrument Payable on Demand within a reasonable time after its issue

    (a) In case of note, it must be presented for payment within a reasonable timefrom issue;

    (b) In case of a bill of exchange, it must be presented for payment within areasonable time from last negotiation.

    The last negotiation is the last transfer for value. Subsequent transfersbetween banks for purposes of collection are not negotiations within thissection.

    Reasonable time has been defined as so much time as is necessary underthe circumstances for a reasonable prudent and diligent man to do,conveniently, what the contract or duty requires should be done, having aregard for the rights and possibility of loss, if any, to the other party. ( Far EastRealty Investment Inc. vs. CA, 166 SCRa 256, 1994 BEQ)

    3. demand bill of exchange within a reasonable time after the last negotiation.(Sec. 71, NIL) (NOTE: though reasonable time from last negotiation, it may beunreasonable time from issuance thus holder may not be HDC under sec. 71 )

    Check - must be presented for payment within reasonable time after its issue ordrawer will be discharged from liability thereon to extent of loss caused by delay

    How time computed

    When payable at a (1) fixed period after date, (2) after sight, or (3) after thathappening of a specified event, exclude day from which the time

    is to begin to run, include date of payment. (Sec. 86, NIL) Where the day, or the last day for payment falls on a Sunday or on a holiday

    may be done on the next succeeding secular or business day. (Sec. 194,NIL)

    Where DELAY excused

    When the delay is caused by circumstances beyond the control of the holder andnot imputable to his default, misconduct, or negligence; when the cause of delayceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence (Sec.81,NIL)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    4/32

    Manner of Presentment

    The instrument must be exhibited; when paid, must be delivered up to the partypaying it.(Sec. 74, NIL)

    B. PARTIES TO WHOM PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE

    What constitutes a sufficient presentment. (Sec. 72, NIL)

    Presentment for payment, to be sufficient, must be made1. By the holder, or by some person authorized to receive payment on his behalf.

    (a) Presentment for payment of a promissory note by a bank having it forcollection is sufficient. (Caine v. Foreman, 289 Pac. 929).

    (b) Instrument must be exhibited to the person from whom payment isdemanded, and when it is paid must be delivered up to the party paying it.(Sec. 74). Demand over the telephone therefore cannot constitute properpresentment.

    First Acceptance v. Dimayuga11 SCRA 114 (1967)

    The instrument must be exhibited in order that the maker or theacceptor may be able to determine the genuineness of theinstrument, the right of the holder to receive pyment, and so that hemay immediately reclaim possession upon paying the amount.Non-exhibition or surrender would not constitute due presentmentto charge drawer and endorsers.

    (c) The makers right to exhibition of a note is waived when he does not demandto see the note and he refuses payment on some other grounds.(Greensteen v. Kucharski. 140 Atl. 482; Foster East J ordan Realty Co.,177 N.W. 987).

    2. At a reasonable hour on a business day3. To the person primarily liable or if absent to any person found at the place where

    presentment is made4. Where Notice must be Sent: Where a party has added an address to his

    signature, notice of dishonor must be sent to that address; but if he has not givensuch address, then the notice must be sent as follows:(a) Either to the post office nearest to his place of residence or to the post office

    where he is accustomed to receive his letters; or(b) If he lives in one place, and has his place or business in another, notice may

    be sent to either place; or(c) If he is sojourning in another place, notice may be sent to the place where he

    is so sojourning.

    But where the notice is actually received by the party within the time specifiedby law, it will be sufficient, though not sent in accordance with the requirementof this section. (Section 108, NIL).

    By Whom: the holder, or by some person authorized to receive payment on hisbehalf;

    Only the holder or one authorized by him has the right to make presentment forpayment

    CHAN WAN v. TAN KIM(1960)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    5/32

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    6/32

    2) no place of payment specified but address of the person to make payment isgiven in the instrument at the address given;

    3) no place of payment and no address is given at the usual place of business orresidence of the person to make payment;

    4) in any other case wherever person to make payment can be (1) found, or if

    presented (2) at his last known place of business or residence

    TO WHOM PRESENTMENT OF PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE:

    (1) Person primarily liable on the instrument, or if he is absent or inaccessible Presentment for payment is made to the maker, or acceptor. Not to the

    person secondarily liable.Hence:

    1. For Promissory Notes: it is necessary that: Presentment for paymentmust be made to the person primarily liable (Section 71);

    If the note is dishonored by nonpayment, notice of dishonor bynonpayment must be given to the person secondarily liable (Sec. 80),unless excused

    2. In All Other Cases: it is necessary that Protest for nonpayment by drawee is necessary to charge an acceptor

    for honor (Sec. 167); Protest for nonpayment by the acceptor for honor is also required.

    (Sec. 170). Acts needed to charge persons secondarily liable:

    a) Presentment for payment/acceptanceb) Dishonor by non-payment/non-acceptancec) Notice of dishonor to secondary parties

    (2) To any person found at the place where the presentment is made.

    where principal debtor is dead and no place of payment is specified to hispersonal representative, IF any AND IF he can be found with the exercise ofreasonable diligence (Sec. 76, NIL)

    where persons primarily liable are partners and no place of payment isspecified, presentment for - to any one of them, even though there has beena dissolution of the firm. (Sec. 77, NIL)

    joint debtors and no place of payment is specified - to them all (Sec. 78,NIL)

    If payable at the special place, and the person liable is willing to pay there atmaturity, such willingness and ability is equivalent to tender of payment.

    C. DISPENSATION WITH PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT

    Presentment not required to charge the drawer:a. He has no right to expectb. He has no right to require that the drawee or acceptor will pay (Sec 79, NIL)

    Presentment not required to charge the indorser where:a. The instrument was made or accepted for his accommodationb. He has no reason to expect that the instrument will be paid if presented (Sec. 80,

    NIL)

    Only the drawer or indorser are not discharged. All other parties secondarilyliable are discharged.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    7/32

    When delay in making presentment is excused Delay in making presentment for payment is excused when the delay is caused

    by circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to hisdefault, misconduct, or negligence.

    When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made withreasonable diligence. (Sec. 81, NIL)

    When presentment for payment is excusedPresentment for payment is excused:1. Where, after the exercise of reasonable diligence, presentment, as required by

    this Act, cannot be made;2. Where the drawee is a fictitious person;3. By waiver of presentment, express or implied. (Sect. 82, NIL)

    What is excused is the failure to make presentment. There is no need to make

    any presentment versus under section 81 (delay in presentment) presentment forpayment is still required after the cause of delay has ceased.

    D. DISHONOR BY NON-PAYMENT

    The instrument is dishonored by non-payment when:

    1. It is duly presented for payment and payment is refused or cannot be obtained;or

    2. Presentment is excused and the instrument is overdue and unpaid. (Sec. 83,NIL)

    Liability of person secondarily liable, when instrument dishonored

    Subject to the provisions of this Act, when the instrument is dishonored by non-payment, an immediate right of recourse to all parties secondarily liable thereonaccrues to the holder.(Sec. 84)

    EFFECTS OF DISHONOR BY NON-PAYMENT: An immediate right ofrecourse to all parties secondarily liable accrues to the holder (Sec. 84)

    Parties cease to be secondarily liable and become principal debtors.

    Liability becomes the same as that of the original obligors.

    PNB v. SEETO (1952)On 13 March, Seeto indorsed to PNB-Surigao a bearer check dated 10March drawn against PBC-Cebu. PNB-Surigao mailed the check to itsCebu branch on 20 March & was presented to the drawee bank on 09

    April. The check was dishonored for insufficient funds because thedelay in presentment cause the exhaustion of the drawer's funds.Indorser Seeto asked that the suit be deferred while he made inquiries.He assured PNB that he would refund the value in case of dishonor.

    HELD: The indorser is discharged from liability by reason of the delay inthe presentment for payment, under 84.Drawer had enough funds when he issued the check because hissubsequent checks drawn against the same bank had been encashed.The assurances of refund by the indorser are the ordinary obligation ofan indorser which are discharged by the unreasonable delay inpresentation of the check.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    8/32

    NOTE: Camposes note that the discharge of the indorser should havebeen based on 66 & 71 on presentment as a condition to theindorser's liability & presentment for payment of a demand bill madewithin a reasonable time from its last negotiation.

    Is the drawer an indispensible party to a suit against the indorsers in case ofdishonor of the instrument by nonpayment?

    After an instrument is dishonored by non-payment, indorsers cease to be merelysecondarily liable; they become principal debtors whose liability becomes identical tothat of the original obligor. The holder of a negotiable instrument need not evenproceed against the maker before suing the indorser. Hence, the drawer is not anindispensible party in an action against the indorser of the checks. (TUAZON VS.HEIRS OF RAMOS, G.R. No. 156262 14 J uly 2005)

    XI. NOTICE OF DISHONORBy notice of dishonor is meant bringing either verbally or by writing, to the

    knowledge of the drawer or indorser of an instrument, the fact that a specifiednegotiable instrument, upon proper proceedings taken, has not been accepted or hasntbeen paid, and that the party notified is expected to pay it.

    A. PARTIES TO BE NOTIFIED

    To whom notice of dishonor MUST be given (Sec. 89, NIL)

    Except as herein otherwise provided, when a negotiable instrument has been

    dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment, notice of dishonor must be given to:1. The drawer and to each indorser2. Any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is not given is discharged.

    GULLAS v. PNB (1935)

    Gullas indorsed the treasury warrant which was sold to PNB. Gullas alsomaintained an account with the bank. The warrant was subsequentlydishonored by the Insular Treasurer. The bank sent notices of dishonor toby mail to Gullas which could not be delivered to him at that time becausehe was in Manila. The bank set off Gullas' deposits as payment of the

    warrant. This resulted in the non-payment of checks he had issued.

    HELD: A notice of dishonor is necessary to charge an indorser & that theright of action against him does not accrue until the notice is given.

    As a general rule, a bank has a right of set off of the deposits in its handsfor the payment of any indebtedness to it on the part of a depositor.However, prior to the mailing of notice of dishonor & without awaiting anyaction by Gullas, the bank made use of the money standing in his accountto make good for the treasury warrant. Gullas was merely an indorser &notice should actually have been given to him in order that he mightprotect his interests.

    To whom notice MAY BE given

    1. To his principal, in case of an instrument dishonored in the hands of an agent(Sec. 94, NIL)

    2. To the party himself or his agent in that behalf (Sec. 97, NIL)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    9/32

    When notice is given to an agent, he must be duly authorized to receivenotice of dishonor, otherwise, the notice is not valid.

    3. Where party is dead and death known to the party giving notice (1) MUST begiven to a personal representative, if there be one, and if with reasonable

    diligence, he can be found; (2) no personal representative MAY be sent to thelast residence or last place of business of the deceased. (Sec. 98, NIL)4. Partners to any one partner, even though there has been a dissolution. (Sec.

    99, NIL)

    a. Persons jointly liable. to each of them unless one of them has authority toreceive such notice for the others. (Sec. 100, NIL)

    b. Bankrupt. where a party has been adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent,or hasmade an assignemnet for the benefit of creditors, notice may be given either tothe party himself or to his trustee or assignee (Sec. 101, NIL)

    H & BC v. Peoples Bank

    35 SCRA 140 (1970)

    The period within which to clear checks at the clearing house of theCentral Bank was 24 hours (i.e, any forgery must be discovered andreported within 24 hours). Hongkong and Shanghai Banks representativewhether the check was in fact genuine.

    Shanghai Bank said yes. This had to be done within 24 hours. Twomonths later, the forgery was discovered and Hongkong and shanghaiBank sought to recover, but this was denied by the court. Because theperiod of clearing has been extended to 180 days, but once any alteration

    is discovered, the same must be reported within 24 hours after discovery.

    B. PARTIES WHO MAY GIVE NOTICE OF DISHONOR

    By Whom Given

    o (1) By or on behalf of the holder or (2) any party to the instrument who maybe compelled to pay it to the holder, and who, upon taking it up, would have aright to reimbursement from the party to whom the notice is given (Sec. 90,NIL)

    o Notice of dishonor may be given by an agent either in his own name or in thename of any party entitled to give notice, whether that party be his principal ornot (Sec. 91, NIL)

    o Where instrument has been dishonored in hands of agent, he may eitherhimself give notice to the parties liable thereon, or he may give notice to hisprincipal (as if agent were holder) (Sec. 94, NIL)

    By Whom Given

    Notice of Dishonor may be given:1. By or on behalf of the holder2. By or on behalf of any party who:

    a. Is a party to the instrument and might be compelled to pay the instrument.b. To a holder who having taken it up would have a right of reimbursement

    from the party to whom notice is given. (Sec. 90, NIL)

    Notice of dishonor may be given by any agent either:a. in his own name; orb. in the name of any party entitled to give notice, whether that party be hisprincipal or not. (Sec. 91, NIL)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    10/32

    Where instrument has been dishonored in hands of agent, he may either himself

    give notice to:1. the parties liable thereon; or2. to his principal (within the same timeas if agent was an independent holder)

    (Sec. 94, NIL)

    Q. DOES FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF DISHONOR OF A PREVIOUSINSTALLMENT TO PERSONS SECONDARILY LIABLE ALSO DISCHARGETHEM ON THE SUCCEEDING INSTALLMENTS?

    A. It depends on whether the instrument contains an acceleration clause

    RULE WHERE THERE IS NO ACCELERATION CLAUSE Where the instrument contains no acceleration clause, failure to give

    notice of dishonor on previous installment doesnt discharge drawersand indorsers as to the succeeding installments, and therefore, the

    holder can file an action against them for such succeedinginstallments, notice is given The reason is that each separate installment is equivalent to another note

    RULE WHERE THERE IS AN ACCELERATION CLAUSE It depends whether the clause is optional or automatic If it is automatic, failure to give notice of dishonor as to a previous

    installment will discharge the persons secondarily liable as to thesucceeding installments

    If it is optional and it is not exercised, the rule would be the same as wherethere is no acceleration clause

    C. EFFECT OF NOTICE

    Effect of notice on behalf of holder

    Where notice is given by or on behalf of the holder, it inures to the benefit of allsubsequent holders and all prior parties who have a right of recourse against theparty to whom it is given. (Sec. 92, NIL)

    Effect where notice is given by a party entitled thereto

    Where notice is given by or on behalf of a party entitled to give notice, it inures tothe benefit of the holder and all parties subsequent to the party to whom notice isgiven. (Sec. 93, NIL)

    In whose favor notice operates

    1. when given by/on behalf of holder: insures to benefit ofa. all subsequent holders andb. all prior parties who have a right of recourse vs. the party to whom its given

    2. where notice given by/on behalf of a party entitled to give notice: insures forbenefit ofa. holder , andb. all parties subsequent to party to whom notice given

    General rule: Any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is not given isdischarged.

    Exceptions:a. Waiver(Sec. 109, NIL)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    11/32

    b. Notice is dispensed (Sec. 112, NIL)c. Not necessary to Drawer(Sec. 114, NIL)d. Not necessary to Indorser(Sec. 115, NIL)

    If notice is delayed, delay may be excused(Sec. 113, NIL)

    D. FORM OF NOTICE

    Form of notice (Sec. 96, NIL)

    The notice may be:1. in writing; or2. merely oral

    Contents: may be given in any terms which sufficiently1. identify the instrument, and

    2. indicate that it has been dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment.

    It may in all cases be given:1. by delivering it personally; or2. through the mails.

    The ff. notice still sufficient: (Sec. 95, NIL )(1) a written notice, not signed(2) insufficient written notice, supplemented and validated by verbal

    communication(3) instrument suffering from misdescription UNLESS the party to whom the notice

    is given is in fact misled thereby.

    TIME WITHIN WHICH NOTICE GIVEN

    1. Notice may not be given before the maturity of the instrument. Notice maybe given on the date of maturity, provided that instrument has been presentedfor payment and it has been dishonored.

    2. Where Parties Reside in Same Place: where the person given and theperson to receive notice reside in the same place, notice must be given withinthe following periods:(a) If given at the place of businss of the person to receive notice it must be

    given before the close of business hours on the day following:(b) If given by mail it must be deposited in the post office in time to reach him

    in usual course on the day following. (Sec. 103, NIL). Same place referes to the corporate limits of a town or city where the

    presentment is made or where the holder resides.

    3. Where Parties Reside in Different Place: Where the person giving and theperson to receive notice reside in different place, the notice must be givenwithin the following periods:(a) If sent by mail, it must be deposited in the post office in time to go by mail

    the day following the day of the dishonor, or if there be no mail at aconvenient hour or that day, by the next mail thereafter;

    (b) If given otherwise than through post office, then within the time that noticewould have been received in due course of mail, if it had been depositedin post office within the time specified. (Sec. 104, NIL).NOTE: these provisions are similar to Art. 54 of the Code of Commercewhich provides: contracts enetered into through correspondence shall be

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    12/32

    perfected from the time an answer is made accepting the propositions bywhich the latter may be modified.

    4. Where a party receives notice of dishonor, he has, after the receipt of suchnotice, the same time for giving notice to antecedent parties that the holder

    has after the dishonor. (sec. 107, NIL).

    E. WAIVER

    When Waiver of Dishonor May Be Made (Sec. 109, NIL)

    1. Before the time of giving notice has arrived, such as express waiver in thebody of the instrument or added to the signature of the party; or

    2. After omission to give due notice> Waiver of notice may be expressed or implied- Waiver may be implied from acts, declarations, or silence

    Whom Affected by Waiver in General (Sec. 110, NIL) The persons affected by waiver depends upon whether the waiver is in the

    instrument itself or is written above the signature of the indorser If the waiver is embodied in the instrument itself, it is binding upon all parties If the waiver is written above the signature of an indorser, it binds him

    only

    Waiver of Protest

    Whether in the case of foreign bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument, isdeemed to be a waiver not only of a formal protest but also of presentment andnotice of dishonor. (Sec. 111, NIL).

    PROTEST:1. Where any negotiable instrument has been dishonored, it may be protested

    for non-acceptance or non-payment, as the case may be (Sec. 118, NIL).2. But protest is not required except I the case of foreign bills of exchange (Sec.

    118, NIL).3. Distinctions between Inland Bill and Foreign Bill:

    An inland bill of exchange bill of exchange is a bill which is or on its face,purports to be, both drawn and payable within the Philippines. Any other bill isforeign bill which is onewhich is, or on its face purports to be drawn or payableoutside the Philippines. (Sec. 129, NIL).

    A foreign bill of exchange is one:(a) Drawn in the Philippines but payable outside the Philippines.(b) Payable in the Philippines but drawn outside the PhilippinesNOTE: Unless the contrary appears on the face of the bill of exchange, the

    holder may treat it as an inland bill of exchange.4. UnderSec. 118 NIL, verbal notice of dishonor is s sufficient in case of

    promissory note and inland bill of exchange. But with respect to a foreign billof exchange, a protest is needed.

    Where presentment for payment is waived, notice of dishonor is also waived But where notice of dishonor is waived, presentment for payment is not

    waived Where protest is waived, notice and presentment is waived

    When Delay In notice allowed

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    13/32

    Delay in giving notice of dishonor is excused when the delay is caused bycircumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default,misconduct, or negligemce. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, noticemust be given with reasonable diligence. (Sec. 113, NIL).

    When Notice Need Not Be Given to Drawer

    Notice of dishonor is not required to be given to the drawer in any of the followingcases:(a) Where the drawer and drawee are the same person;(b) When the drawee is a fictitious person or a person not having capacity to

    contract;(c) When the drawer is the person to whom the instrument is presented for

    payment(d) Where the drawer has no right to expect or require that the drawee or acceptor

    will honor the instrument;

    (e) Where the drawer has countermanded payment (Sec. 114, NIL).

    Where not necessary to charge endorser

    Notice of dishonor is not required to be given to an endorser in either of thefollowing cases:(a) When the drawee is a fictitious person or does not have capacity to contract

    and the endorser was aware of this at the time of endorsement;(b) Where the endorser is the person to whom the instrument is presented for

    payment;(c) Where the instrument was made or accepted for his accommodation (Sec. 115,

    NIL).

    Where due notice of dishonor by non-acceptance has been given, notice ofsubsequent dishonor by non-payment is not necessary unless in the meantimeinstrument has been accepted.(Sec. 116, NIL).

    Effect of omission to Give notice of Acceptance

    An omission to give notice of dishonor by non-acceptance does not prejudice therights of a holder in due course subsequent to the omission. (Sec. 117, NIL).

    F. DISPENSATION WITH NOTICE

    When notice of dishonor is dispensed with

    Notice of dishonor is dispensed with when, after the exercise of reasonablediligence, it cannot be given to or does not reach the parties sought to be charged.(Sec. 112, NIL)

    Delay in giving notice; how excused (Section 113, NIL)

    Delay in giving notice of dishonor is excused when the delay is caused by

    circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to his default,misconduct, or negligence.

    When the cause of delay ceases to operate, notice must be given withreasonable diligence.

    When political disturbances interrupt and obstruct the ordinarynegotiations of trade, they constitute a sufficient excuse for want of

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    14/32

    presentment or notice, upon the same principle that controls in cases ofmilitary operations or interdictions of commerce, or prevalence of a malignant,contagious, infectious disease.

    Instances when Notice of Dishonor Not Necessary to Drawer(Sec. 114, NIL)

    a. Drawer and drawee same personb. Drawee is a fictitious/incapacitated personc. Drawer is the person to whom presentment for payment is maded. Drawer has no right to expect that the drawee will accept/pay the instrument

    Instances when Notice Not Required to Indorser(Sec. 115, NIL)

    a. drawee was a fictitious/incapacitated person and the indorser was aware of suchat the time of indorsement

    b. indorser is the person to whom instrument was presented for paymentc.

    instrument made/accepted for his accommodation

    G. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE

    Effect of omission to give notice of non-acceptance

    An omission to give notice of dishonor by non-acceptance does not prejudice therights of a holder in due course subsequent to the omission. (Sec. 117, NIL)

    XII. DISCHARGE OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTIt is the release of all parties, whether primary or secondary, from the obligation

    on the instrument; It renders the instrument non-negotiable.

    A.DISCHARGE OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT

    How may a Negotiable Instrument be Discharged (Sec. 119, NIL):

    1. By payment in due course by or on behalf of principal debtor;a. by whom madeb. at or after maturityc. to the holder thereof

    d. in good faith and without notice that his title is defective

    Discharge of the instrument discharges all the parties thereto Payment must be in due course, and by the principal debtor or on his behalf If payment is not made by the principal debtor, payment only cancels the

    liability of the payor and those obligated after him but does not discharge theinstrument.

    Payment by an accommodation party does not discharge the instrument. That the post-dated checks were merely issued as security is not a ground for

    the discharge of the instrument as against a holder in due course. For theonly grounds are those outlined in Section 119 of the Negotiable

    Instruments Law. The intentional cancellation contemplated underpar. C,Sec. 119 is that the cancellation effected by destroying the instrument eitherby tearing it up, burning it, or writing the word canceled on the instrunebt.The drawing and negotiation of a check have certain effects aside from thetransfer of title or the incurring of liability in regard to the instrument by thetransferor. The holder who takes the negotiated paper makes a contract withthe parties on the face of the instrument. There is an implied representationthat funds or credit are available for the payment of the instrument in the bank

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    15/32

    upon which it is drawn. Consequently, the withdrawal of the money from thedrawee bank to avoid liability on the checks cannot prejudice the rights ofholders in due course. (State Investment vs. CA; 217 SCRA 32)

    2. By payment in due course by party accommodated where party is made/ accepted

    for accommodation

    3. By the intentional cancellation thereof by holder a cancellation made unintentionally, or under a mistake or without the authority of

    the holder, is inoperativeBut where an instrument or any signature thereonappears to have been cancelled the burden of proof lies on the party who allegesthat the cancellation was made unintentionally, or under a mistake or withoutauthority. (Sec. 123, NIL).

    4. By any other act which discharges a simple contract for payment of money: (aremission; (b) novation; (c) confusion or merger.

    As to the other modes: pay ment is already in (a) or (b); loss of a negotiableinstrument will not extinguish liability. Compensation is not available so long asan obligation is evidenced by a negotiable instrument.

    PRESUMPTION: when the principal debtor becomes the holder of theinstrument at or after majority in his own right. If a private document evidencingan obligation is in the possession of the debtor, the presumption is that thedebtor has paid such an obligation.

    State Investment v. CA217 SCRA 32 (1993)

    The fact that post dated checks were issued merely as security is not aground for the discharge of the checks as against a holder in due course.

    The intentional cancellation contemplated under Sec. 119 on NIL for thedischarge of an instrument is the cancellation effected by destroying theinstrument either by tearing it up, burning it, or writing the work canceledon the instrument, and certainly requires the lement in the holder inintentionally cancelling it. Cancellation cannot be presumed by failure torecover the instrument.

    The discharge of the instrument would necessarily carry with it thedischarge of the persons primarily liable thereon.

    5. When the principal debtor becomes holder of instrument at or after maturity in hisown right

    6. renunciation of holder: (Sec. 122, NIL) holder may expressly renounce his rights vs. any party to the instrument, before

    or after its maturity absolute and unconditional renunciation of his rights against PRINCIPAL

    DEBTOR made at or after maturity discharges the instrument renunciation does not affect rights of HDC w/o notice. Renunciation must be in writing unless instrument delivered up to person

    primarily liable thereon

    7. material alteration review Sec. 125, NIL: what constitutes material alteration (Sec.124, NIL: material alteration w/o assent of all parties liable avoids instrument exceptas against party to alteration and subsequent indorsers)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    16/32

    Payment by Principal DebtorIn order to discharge the instrument, the payment must be1. a payment in due course,2. a payment made by the principal debtor

    PRINCIPAL DEBTOR - Person ultimately bound to pay the debt

    If payment is made before the date of maturity, the instrument is notdischarged as the payment is not in due course

    Where payment is made by a party who is not a primary obligor or anaccommodation party, his payment only conceals his own liability and thosewho are obligated after him. All prior parties primarily or secondarilyliable on the bill, are liable to such a payer, and the payer may cancelindorsements subsequent to his own and reissue the paper, and it will bevalid as against the prior partie.

    Payment by Third Persons

    If payment is made by a third person, the instrument is not discharged becausepayment is not made by the person principally liable Not any one who desires may pay the instrument and then recover of the maker.

    He must be a person who has in some way made himself liable for the paymentof the instrument.EXCEPTION: Where an instrument has been protested and someonevoluntarily makes payment supra protest or for honor. And if theinstrument was to give money in payment, the instrument is

    discharged.

    Summary of Discharge by Payment

    1. Payment by a person ultimately liable, whatever his position in the paper,is a discharge of the instrument

    2. Payment by an accommodation party isnt a discharge of theinstrument, whatever his position thereon and whether the indorsementbe regular or anomalous

    3. Payment by the drawer or indorser is not a discharge of the instrument

    B. DISCHARGE OF PARTIES SECONDARILY LIABLE

    When persons secondarily liable on the instrument are discharged

    1. By any act which discharges the instrument

    2. By the intentional cancellation of his signature by the holdera) No consideration is necessary to support a discharge by intentional

    cancellation of an endorsers signature by holder.

    3. By the discharge of a prior party

    (a) Discharge of a party by intentional cancellation of his signature also operatesto discharge parties subsequent to the party discharged.(b) The rule only applies to discharge by the act of the holder and not to

    discharges by operation of law, such as insolvency.

    4. By a valid tender or payment made by a prior party

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    17/32

    5. By a release of the principal debtor unless the holders right of recourse againstthe party secondarily liable is expressly reserved

    6. By any agreement binding upon the holder to extend the time of payment or topostpone the holders right to enforce the instrument unless made with the

    assent of the party secondarily liable or unless the right of recourse against suchparty is expressly reserved. (Sec. 120, NIL)

    7. Failure to make due presentment (Sec. 70, 144)

    8. Failure to give notice of dishonor

    9. Certification of check at instance of holder

    10. Reacquisition by prior party

    where instrument negotiated back to a prior party, such party may reissue andfurther negotiate, but not entitled to enforce payment vs. any intervening party towhom he was personally liable

    where instrument is paid by party secondarily liable, its not discharged, but a. the party so paying it is remitted to his former rights as regard to all prior

    partiesb. and he may strike out his own and all subsequent indorsements, and again

    negotiate instrument, except where its payable to order of 3rd party and has been paid by drawer where its made/accepted for accommodation and has been paid by party

    accommodated

    In the discharging of persons secondarily liable:

    (a) The liability of a party secondarily liable is subsidiary.(b) His liability is similar (but not exactly the same) to that of a guarantor.(c) Endorsers are liable in the order in which they endorse.

    GENERAL PROCEDURES TO CHARGE PERSON SECONDARILY LIABLE:

    1. In the three cases required by law, presentment for acceptance to the drawee ornegotiation within a reasonable time after acquisition is required (Secs. 143 and

    144, NIL), unless excused. (Sec. 148, NIL). In all other cases, there is no needfor presentment for acceptance.

    2. If bill is dishonored by non-acceptance: (a) notice of dishonor by non-acceptancemust be given to persons secondarily liable (Sec. 80) unless excused (Sec. 117);and (b) in case of foreign bils, protest for dishonor by non-acceptance must bemade, unless excused (Secs 117 and 159, NIL).

    3. But if the bill is accepted, or if the bill is not required to be presented foracceptance, it must be presented for payment to the persons primarily liable(Sec. 71, NIL), unless excused. (Sec. 82, NIL).

    4. If the bill is dishonored by nonpayment then: A notice of dishonor by nonpayment must also be given to persons secondarily

    liable (Sec. 80, NIL), unless excused; and In case of foreign bill a protest for dishonor by nonpayment must be made (Sec.

    152, NIL), unless excused.

    C. RIGHT OF PARTY WHO DISCHARGED INSTRUMENT

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    18/32

    Right of party who discharges instrument (Sec. 121, NIL)

    Where the instrument is paid by a party secondarily liable thereon, it is notdischarged; but the party so paying it is remitted to his former rights (e.g. right to

    Collect) as regard all prior parties and he may strike out his own and all subsequentindorsements and again negotiate the instrument (to new parties- but not tosubsequent parties) except:

    1) Where the bill of exchange is payable to the order of a third person and hasbeen paid by the drawer himself; and

    2) Where it was made or accepted for accommodation and has been paid by theparty accommodated.

    The party secondarily liable who pays will have the effect of discharging theparty paying

    The party paying is remitted to his former rights against parties prior to him; ifhe was formerly a holder in due course, even if at the time of payment healready had notice of the defects of the title, he can enforce his rights againstany of the prior parties free from defenses.

    D. RENUNCIATION BY HOLDER

    As a Rule: The holder may expressly renounce his rights against any party to the

    instrument before, at, or after its maturity. (Sec. 122, NIL) An absolute and unconditional renunciation of his rights against the principal

    debtor made at or after the maturity of the instrument discharges theinstrument.

    However: A renunciation does not affect the rights of a holder in due course without

    notice. A renunciation must be in writing unless the instrument is delivered up to the

    person primarily liable thereon. [Section 122, Negotiable Instruments Law]

    Renunciation by a holder discharges an instrument when:a. it is absolute and unconditionalb. made in favor of a person primarily liablec. made at or after maturity of the instrumentd. in writing or the instrument is delivered up to the person primarily liable

    (Sec. 122, NIL )

    Section 122, NIL applies only to renunciation by the unilateral act of theholder without consideration and in cases where the instrument is notdelivered up to the person intended to be released

    Renunciationact of surrendering a right or claim without recompense but it canbe applied with equal propriety to the relinquishing of a demand upon anagreement supported by a consideration

    if renounced in favor of a party secondarily liable, only he is exonerated from liabilityand all parties subsequent to him

    discharge by novation is allowed

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    19/32

    XIII. MATERIAL ALTERATIONMaterial Alteration - Any change in the instrument which affects or changes theliability of the parties in any way.

    A. CONCEPT

    There is no distinction between fraudulent and innocent alteration An alteration is said to be material if it alters the effect of the instrument. In other

    words, a material alteration is one which changes the items which are required tobe stated under Sec.1, NIL. ( PNB v. CA et al. 256 SCRA 491)

    What constitutes a material alteration

    UnderSection 125 NIL,any alteration which changes the following are considered

    material alterations:

    1. The date;

    2. The sum payable, either for principal or interest;

    3. The time or place of payment:

    4. The number or the relations of the parties;

    5. The medium or currency in which payment is to be made;

    6. Or which adds a place of payment where no place of payment is specified, or anyother change or addition which alters the effect of the instrument in any respect,is a material alteration.

    Does the alteration on the serial number of the check constitute materialalteration?

    A serial number is an item which is not an essential requisite for negotiability underSec. 1 of NIL, and which does not affect the right of the parties, hence its alteration

    is not material. (PNB v. CA, 256 SCRA 491, 1999 BEQ)

    The alteration on the serial numbers do not constitute material alteration within thecontemplation of the Negotiable instruments Law. An alteration is said to bematerial if it alters the effect of the instrument. It means an authorized change in aninstrument that purports to modify in any respect the obligation of a party or anunauthorized addition of words or numbers or other change to an incompleteinstrument relating to the obligation of a party. In other words, a material alterationis one which changes the items which are required to be stated under Section 1 ofthe NIL (THE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BANK, INC. v. COURT OFAPPEALS, G.R. No. 129910, September 5, 2006)

    B. EFFECT OF MATERIAL ALTERATION

    General rule:

    When materially altered, without the consent of all parties liable, the instrument isavoided except as against:1. The party who has made the alteration

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    20/32

    2. The party who authorized or assented to the alteration.3. Subsequent indorsers

    Exception:

    When an instrument has been materially altered and is in the hands of a holder indue course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce payment thereof accordingto its original tenor. [Section 124, Negotiable Instruments Law]

    The EFFECTS of alteration:

    1. Alteration by a PARTY

    Material alteration by the holder discharged the instrument and all priorparties thereto who did not give their consent to such alteration.

    Whether the alteration made is favorable or unfavorable to the party making

    the alteration, no distinction as to the effect is made. The intent of the law is topreserve the integrity of the negotiable instrument.

    2. Alteration by a STRANGER ( SPOLIATION)

    If subsequently negotiated to a non-Holder in Due CourseA materialalteration avoids the instrument as against any prior party who has not assented tothe alteration.

    If subsequently negotiated to a Holder in Due CourseHe may enforcepayment thereof according to its original tenor regardless of whether the alterationwas innocent or fraudulent.

    XIV. ACCEPTANCEA. DEFINITION

    Acceptance is the signification by the drawee of his assent to the order of thedrawer. It is an act by which a person on whom the BOE is drawn assents to therequest of the drawer to pay it. (Sec. 132, NIL)

    The term, ACCEPTANCE referes only to a bill of exchange. A promissorynote is not to be presented for acceptance.

    The purpose of an acceptance is to bind the DRAWEE, because the draweedoes not become a party unless he accepts. Upon an acceptance by thedrawee, he becomes an ACCEPTOR and the bill, in effect becomes a note.The drawee assumes the liability of a maker who is primarily liable.

    FORMAL REQUISITES OF ACCEPTANCE:a. the signification by the drawee of his assent to the order of the drawerb. "Acceptance" completed by delivery or notification (Sec. 19, NIL)c. in writing and signed by the drawee; must not express that the drawee

    will perform his promise by any other means than the payment of money.(Sec.132, NIL); does not change the implied promise of acceptor to pay

    only in moneyo Thus, there is no valid oral or implied acceptance except in case of Sec.

    137 (Constructive Acceptance)

    B. MANNER

    Manner of acceptance

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    21/32

    1. Actual/Express Acceptance

    Requisites of actual acceptance:a. In writing and signed by the drawee.b. Must not express that the drawee will perform his promise by any other

    means than the payment of money. (Section 132, NIL)c. The acceptance must be communicated or delivered to the holder

    A holder of a bill presenting the same for acceptance has the right to:

    1) Require that acceptance be written on the bill and, if such request is refused,may treat the bill as dishonored (Sec. 133, NIL)

    Where an acceptance is written on a paper other than the bill itself, it doesnot bind the acceptor except in favor of a person to whom it is shown andwho, on the faith thereof, receives the bill for value. (Section 134, NIL)

    i. Refuse to accept a qualified acceptance and may treat it as dishonored (Sec.142, NIL)

    SUMCAD v. PROVINCE OF SAMAR1956.

    There was implied acceptance in view of the circumstances of thecase (furnishing of photostatic copies, presentment for certification) byvoluntary assuming the obligation of holding so much deposit as wouldbe sufficient to cover the amount of the check.

    2. Constructive Acceptance:

    Where the drawee to whom the bill has been delivered1. destroys it OR2. refuses within 24 hrs after such delivery or within such time as is given, toreturn the bill accepted or not. (Sec. 137, NIL)

    - Drawee becomes primarily liable as an acceptor._ Mere retention is equivalent to acceptance

    Where bill is duly presented and is not accepted within prescribed time, theperson presenting it must treat the bill as dishonored by nonacceptance or heloses right of recourse against the drawer and indorsers. (Sec. 150, NIL)

    If there is not demand for the return of the bill and the drawee keeps it untilafter the expiration of said period without expressly accepting or refusing it;two views:

    a. Constitutes constructive noticeb. Constitutes dishonor because Sec.137, NIL uses the word "refuses"- Acceptance, if given, will retroact to date of presentation.

    3. General Acceptance

    A general acceptance assents without qualification to the order of the drawer.

    What constitutes a general acceptance

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    22/32

    An acceptance to pay at a particular place is a general acceptance unlessit expressly states that the bill is to be paid there only and not elsewhere. (Sec.140, NIL)

    4. Qualified Acceptance

    A qualified acceptance in express terms varies the effect/tenor of the bill asdrawn. (Sec. 139, NIL) An acceptance is qualified which is:

    1. Conditional; which makes payment by the acceptor dependent on thefulfillment of a condition therein stated;

    2. Partial; an acceptance to pay part only of the amount for which the bill isdrawn;

    3. Local; an acceptance to pay only at a particular place;4. Qualified as to time;5. The acceptance of some, one or more of the drawees but not of all. (Sec.

    141, NIL)

    So if a bill for P500,000 was accepted but only for P300,000, the acceptanceis deemed to be a qualified one because the acceptance was not inaccordance with the tenor of the bill. The acceptor will then be liable for theamount of P300,000 which is the tenor of his acceptance, not for P500,000which is the tenor of the bill.

    WHAT MAY THE HOLDER DO UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?

    Rights of parties as to qualified acceptance

    1. The holder may refuse to take a qualified acceptance and if he doesnot obtain an unqualified acceptance, he may treat the bill as dishonored bynon-acceptance. (He now must furnish the parties secondarily liable, a noticeof dishonor)

    2. Where a qualified acceptance is taken, the drawer and indorsers aredischarged from liability on the bill unless they have expressly or impliedlyauthorized the holder to take a qualified acceptance, or subsequently assentthereto.

    3. When the drawer or an indorser receives notice of a qualifiedacceptance, he must, within a reasonable time, express his dissent to theholder or he will be deemed to have assented thereto. (Sec. 142, NIL)

    ACCEPTANCE ON A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT Extrinsic acceptance - acceptance is written on a paper other than the bill

    itself; doesnt bind the acceptor except in favor of a person to whom it is shownand who, on the faith thereof, receives the bill for value. (Sec. 134, NIL);acceptance of an existing bill

    Virtual acceptance - unconditional promise in writing to accept a bill before itis drawn; deemed an actual acceptance in favor of every person who, upon thefaith thereof, receives the bill for value. (Sec. 135, NIL); acceptance of future bill

    In both cases, the acceptance must clearly and unequivocally identify thebill to which the acceptance refers.

    C. TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE

    Time allowed drawee to accept

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    23/32

    The drawee is allowed twenty-four hours after presentment in which to decidewhether or not he will accept the bill; the acceptance, if given, dates as of the day ofpresentation. (Sec. 136, NIL)

    A bill may be accepted:

    a. before it has been signed by the drawer, orb. while otherwise incomplete, orc. when it is overdue, ord. after it has been dishonored by a previous refusal to accept, or by non

    payment.

    But when a bill payable after sight is dishonored by non-acceptance anddrawee subsequently accepts it, the holder, in the absence of differentagreement, is entitled to have bill accepted as of date of the 1st presentment.(Sec. 138, NIL); Sec. 138, NIL allows acceptance to be made while the billis incomplete.

    D. RULES GOVERNING ACCEPTANCE

    24-Hour Clearing House Rule (1996 BEQ)

    The Central Bank, in accordance with its rule-making authority issued the 24-hour clearing house rule. Whatever remedy the plaintiff has would lie not against thedefendant bank but as against the party responsible for changing the name of thepayee. Its failure to call the attention of defendant bank as to such alteration untilthe lapse of 27 days would, in the light of the above Central Bank Circular, negatewhatever right it may have had against defendant bank (Hong Kong and ShanghaiBanking Corp. vs. Peoples Republic Bank and Trust co., 35 SCRA 140)

    The 24-hour clearing house rule is a valid rule applicable to commercial banks. Itis true that when an endorsement is forged, the collecting bank or last endorser, as ageneral rule, bears the loss. But the unqualified endorsement of the collecting bankon the check should be read together with the 24-hour regulation on clearing houseoperation. Thus, when the drawee bank fails to return a forged or altered check tothe collecting bank within the 24-hour clearing period, the collecting bank is absolvedfrom liability (Republic Bank vs. CA; 196 SCRA 100).

    Under the clearing house rules, the failure to return within the prescribedtime will be deemed payment or acceptance of the check.

    A bill of exchange does not need to be presented for acceptance at all times,. Inorder to know whether or not presentment for acceptance is necessary, you have tolook at the bill.

    When presentment for acceptance is necessary:a. If necessary to fix the maturity of the billb. If it is expressly stipulated that it shall be presented for acceptancec. If the bill is drawn payable elsewhere than the residence or place of business

    of the drawee (Sec. 143 NIL)

    So when the bill is written as Pay at sight.. the drawee must see the bill firstand he can only see the bill if it is to be presented for acceptance. Also if the bill iswritten as : Pay. 30 days after sight, the bills maturity date is 30 dates after thedrawee sees the bill. Hence, it must be presented for acceptance. If the drawees

    place of business is in Manila and the bill is drawn payable in Cavite, then it must bepresented for acceptance.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    24/32

    If by the terms, the bill is to be presented for acceptance, then it must bepresented. If the bill needs a presentment for acceptance, then it must be sopresented. If it is not presented for acceptance, the drawer and the indorserswill be discharged from liability. Therefore, the holder must present it foracceptance or he negotiates the bill within a reasonable time

    Liability of drawee retraining or destroying bill

    Where a drawee to whom a bill is delivered for acceptance destroys the same, orrefuses within twenty-four hours after such delivery or within such other period asthe holder may allow, to return the bill accepted or non-accepted to the holder, hewill be deemed to have accepted the same. (Sec. 137, NIL)

    Acceptance of incomplete bill

    A bill may be accepted before it has been signed by the drawer, or whileotherwise incomplete, or when it is overdue, or after it has been dishonored by aprevious refusal to accept, or by non payment. But when a bill payable after sight isdishonored by non-acceptance and the drawee subsequently accepts it, the holder,in the absence of any different agreement, is entitled to have the bill accepted as ofthe date of the first presentment. (Section 138, NIL)

    XV. PRESENTMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE

    It is the production of a Bill of Exchange to the drawee for his acceptance.

    Purpose:

    To get acceptance of the drawer for purpose of making him primarily liable as anacceptor. Presentment is also prerequisite to the accrual of secondary liabilityagainst the drawer and the indorsers.

    A. TIME/PLACE/MANNER OF PRESENTMENT

    The REQUISITES of Presentment:

    1. Made within reasonable time - is meant not more than 6 months from the dateof issue. Beyond said period, it is unreasonable time and the check becomesstale.

    2. By holderor his agent3. At a reasonable houron a business day4. Before bill overdue.5. To the drawee orsome person authorized to accept or refuse acceptance on

    his behalf; anda. bill addressed to drawees not partners, MUST be made to them all unless

    one has authority to accept or refuse acceptance for all;b. drawee is dead, MAY be made to his personal representative;

    c. drawee has been adjudged a bankrupt or an insolvent or has made anassignment for the benefit of creditors, MAY be made (1) to him or (2) to histrustee or assignee.

    When is presentment for acceptance must be made

    In the following cases:

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    25/32

    1. Where the bill is payable after sight, or in any other case, where presentment foracceptance is necessary in order to fix the maturity of the instrument; or

    2. Where the bill expressly stipulates that it shall be presented for acceptance; or3. Where the bill is drawn payable elsewhere than at the residence or place of

    business of the drawee.

    In no other case is presentment for acceptance necessary in order to renderany party to the bill liable. (Sec. 143, NIL)

    Presentment; how made

    Presentment for acceptance must be made by or on behalf of the holder at areasonable hour, on a business day and before the bill is overdue, to the drawee orsome person authorized to accept or refuse acceptance on his behalf; and1. Where a bill is addressed to two or more drawees who are not partners,

    presentment must be made to them all unless one has authority to accept orrefuse acceptance for all, in which case presentment may be made to him only;

    2. Where the drawee is dead, presentment may be made to his personalrepresentative;3. Where the drawee has been adjudged a bankrupt or an insolvent or has made an

    assignment for the benefit of creditors, presentment may be made to him or tohis trustee or assignee. (Sec. 145, NIL)

    On what days presentment may be made (Sec. 146, NIL)

    A bill may be presented for acceptance on any day on which negotiableinstruments may be presented for payment under the provisions of Sections 72 and85 of the Negotiable Instruments Law. When Saturday is not otherwise a holiday,

    presentment for acceptance may be made before twelve o'clock noon on that day.

    Sec. 72, NIL at a reasonable hour on a business day Sec. 85, NIL

    - at the time fixed therein without grace.- Instruments falling due or becoming payable on Saturday - next

    succeeding business day- EXCEPT instruments payable on demand [at the option of the holder]

    before twelve o'clock noon on Saturday WHEN that entire day is nota holiday.

    Presentment where time is insufficient

    Where the holder of a bill drawn payable elsewhere than at the place of businessor the residence of the drawee has no time, with the exercise of reasonablediligence, to present the bill for acceptance before presenting it for payment on theday that it falls due, the delay caused by presenting the bill for acceptance beforepresenting it for payment is excused and does not discharge the drawers andindorsers. (Sec. 147, NIL)

    Where presentment is excused

    Presentment for acceptance is excused and a bill may be treated as dishonoredby non-acceptance in either of the following cases:1. Where the drawee is dead, or has absconded, or is a fictitious person or a

    person not having capacity to contract by bill.2. Where, after the exercise of reasonable diligence, presentment can not be made.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    26/32

    3. Where, although presentment has been irregular, acceptance has been refusedon some other ground. (Sec. 148, NIL)

    B. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO MAKE PRESENTMENT

    When failure to present releases drawer and indorser)

    Except as herein otherwise provided, the holder of a bill which is required to bepresented for acceptance must either present it for acceptance or negotiate it withina reasonable time. If he fails to do so, the drawer and all indorsers are discharged.(Sec. 144, NIL)

    C. DISHONOR BY NON-ACCEPTANCE

    When dishonored by non-acceptance

    A bill is dishonored by non-acceptance:1. When it is duly presented for acceptance and such an acceptance as is

    prescribed by this Act is refused or cannot be obtained; or2. When presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill is not accepted. (Sec.

    149)

    Duty of holder where bill not accepted

    must treat the bill as dishonored by nonacceptance or he loses the right ofrecourse against the drawer and indorsers. (Sec. 150, NIL)

    Rights of a holder where bill not accepted

    immediate right of recourse against the drawer and indorsers and nopresentment for payment is necessary. (Sec. 151, NIL)

    To whom notice of dishonor must be given

    Except as herein otherwise provided, (1) to the drawer and (2) to each indorser,and any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is not given is discharged.(Sec.89, NIL)

    Effect of omission to give notice of non-acceptance

    does not prejudice the rights of a HDC subsequent to the omission. (Sec. 117,NIL)

    XVI. PROMISSORY NOTES Promissory note, defined

    A negotiable promissory note within the meaning of this Act is an unconditionalpromise in writing made by one person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to

    pay on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money toorder or to bearer. Where a note is drawn to the maker's own order, it is notcomplete until indorsed by him. (Sec. 184)

    Parties:a. Maker one who makes a promise and sign the instrumentb. Payee one to whom the promise is made or the instrument is payable.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    27/32

    What factors would negate personal liability on the part of corporate officerswho signed a promissory note for a loan obtained by the corporation?

    The inference that they signed in their individual capacities would be negated bythe following facts:

    a) The name and address of the corporation appeared on the space provided forMaker/Borrower;

    b) The officers had only had one set of signatures on the instrument, when thereshould have been two, if indeed they have intended to be bound solidarily thefirst as representatives of the corporation, and the second as themselves in theirindividual capacities;

    c) They did not sign under the spaces provided for co -maker, and neither wheretheir addresses reflected there; and

    d) At the back of the promissory note, they signed above the words authorizedrepresentative.

    Requisites of a Negotiable Note (PN): Key: (SUDO)It must:a. be in writing signed by the drawerb. contains an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in moneyc. be payable on demand or at a fixed determinable future timed. be payable to order or to bearer (Sec. 1 NIL)

    OTHER FORMS OF PROMISSORY NOTE

    1. Due bill , An instrument whereby one person acknowledges his indebtedness to

    another and promises to pay a sum certain in money .2. Bonds, which are in the nature of PN.3. Certificate of Deposit issued by banks payable to depositor or his order, or to

    bearer

    Promissory Note vs. Bill of Exchange

    Promissory NoteBill of Exchange

    Unconditional promise Unconditional order

    Involves 2 parties Involves 3 parties

    Maker primarily liable Drawer only secondarily liableOnly 1 presentment - for payment Generally 2 presentments - for acceptanceand for payment

    XVII. CHECKSA. DEFINITION

    Check defined

    A check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. For a checkto be negotiable, it must conform to the requirements in Sec. 1 of the NegotialeInstruments Law.

    Checks have the character of negotiability, but at the same time, they mayconstitute evidence of indebtedness in the amounts stated in thefaces of thoseinstruments (Go v. Bacaron, 472 SCRa 229, 2007 BEQ)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    28/32

    Except as herein otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act applicable to a bill

    of exchange payable on demand apply to a check. (Sec. 185, NIL) A check of itself does not operate as an assignment of any part of the funds to

    the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank, is not liable to the holder,

    unless and until it accepts or certifies the check. A check is payable on demand even when not so stated on its face. A check is supposed to be drawn against a previous deposit of funds, while an

    ordinary need not be drawn against a deposit. A check need not be presented for acceptance.

    Promissory Note vs. Check

    PN CHECK

    - There are two (2) parties, the maker andthe payee

    - There are three (3) parties, the drawer,the drawee bank and the payee

    - May be drawn against any person, notnecessarily a bank - Always drawn against a bank

    - May be payable on demand or at a fixedor determinable future time

    -Always payable on demand

    - A promise to pay - An order to pay

    B. KINDS

    Kinds of Check

    1. Ordinary Check

    2. Cashiers Check, - One drawn by the cashier of a bank in the name of the bankagainst the bank itself payable to a third person or order. A cashier's check is a primary obligation of the issuing bank and accepted in

    advance by its mere issuance.

    3. Certified check , A personal check with guaranteed funds to cover the paymentof the check. The certification is an agreement whereby the bank against whom a check is

    drawn undertakes to pay it on any future time when presented for payment.

    The Certification is equivalent to acceptance and operates as an assignmentof a part of the funds to the creditors. Discuss the effects of certifying a check

    The effects are:b. It is equivalent to acceptance and is the operative act that makes the

    bank liable.c. It amounts to the assignment of the funds of the drawer in the hands of the

    drawee.d. If obtained by the holder, persons secondarily liable are discharged

    4. Voucher Check

    5. Travellers Check

    6. Managers Check

    A check drawn by the manager of a bank in the name of the bank against thebank itself payable to a third person. .It is similar to a cashiers check both asto effect and use. A cashiers check is a check of the banks cashier on his

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    29/32

    own or another check. In effect, it is a bill of exchange drawn by the cashierof a bank upon the bank itself, and accepted in advance by the act of itsissuance. It is really the banks own check and may be treated as apromissory note with the bank as a maker. The check becomes the primaryobligation of the bank which issues it and constitutes its written promise to

    pay upon demand. The mere issuance of it is considered an acceptancethereof. (EQUITABLE PCI vs. ONG 15 September 2006)

    7. Crossed Check ( 2004, 2005 BEQ)

    A Crossed Check under accepted banking practice, crossing a check is doneby writing two parallel lines diagonally on the left top portion of the checks.The crossing is special where the name of the bank or a business institutionis written between the two parallel lines, which mean that the drawee shouldpay only with the intervention of that company.

    The crossing is special where the name of the bank or a business institution

    is written between the two parallel lines, which means that the drawee shouldpay only with the intervention of that company. A check which in addition to the usual contents of an ordinary check contains

    also the name of a certain banker or business entity through whom it must bepresented for payment.

    Effects (1996, 2005 BEQ): In order to preserve the credit worthiness of checks, jurisprudence has

    pronounced that crossing of a check should have the following effects:a. That the check may not be encashed; it may only be deposited with the

    bank;b. That the check may be negotiated only once to a person who has an

    account with the bank; andc. That it serves as a warning to the holder that the check has been issued

    for a definite purpose so that he must inquire if he has received the checkpursuant tothat purpose, otherwise, he is not a holder in due course.(Bataan Cigar v. CA 280 SCRA 643)

    ASSOCIATED BANK v. CA & REYES1992

    Different department stores issued crossed checks bearing "for payee's accountonly" payable to Melissa's RTW. Sayson, acting without authority, deposited &encashed the checks with Associated Bank.HELD: Citing State Invt House v IAC, the effects of crossing a check are:1. check may not be encashed but only deposited in the bank;2. check may be negotiated only one -- to one who has an account with a bank;

    and2. the act of crossing the check serves as a warning to the holder that the check

    has been issued for a definite purpose so that he must inquire if he hasreceived the check pursuant to that purpose.

    The effects of crossing a check relate to the mode of presentment forpayment.The law imposes a duty of diligence on the collecting bank to scrutinize checksdeposited with it, for the purpose of determining their genuineness & regularity.

    *Note: Crossed Checks vs. Cancelled Checks (2004 BEQ)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    30/32

    A crossed check is one with two parallel lines drawn diagonally across itsface or across a corner thereof. On the other hand, a cancelled check is onemarked or stamped "paid" and/or "cancelled" by or on behalf of a drawee bank toindicate payment thereof.

    * State Investment House v IAC (GR 72764 13J ul1989),the SC considered acrossed check as subjecting a subsequent holder thereof to the contractualcovenants of the payor and the payee.

    2 Kinds of Crossed Check:

    3. CROSSSED SPECIALLY- The same name of a particular bank or companyis written or appears between thev. Tan parallel lines in which case thedrawee-bank must pay the check only upon presentment by such bank orcompany (Chan Wan v. Tan Kim 109 Phil 706) on penalty of being made topay agin by the rightful owner should the first payment prove to have been

    erroneous.

    4. CROSSED GENERALLY- only the words and Co. are written between theparallel lines or when none at all is written at all between said lines. This Court has taken judicial cognizance of the practice that a check with

    2 parallel lines in the upper left hand corner means that it could only bedeposited and not converted into cash.

    IRON CLAD RULE prohibits the countermanding of payment of certifiedchecks. (Rep. v. PNB, Dec. 1, 1961)

    *Note: The holder must be a holder in due course before the stop payment ordermay not be successfully invoked against him. (Mesina v. IAC, 146 SCRA 497,505)

    8. Memorandum Check.

    A check in which is written the word "memorandum," "memo" and "mem"signifying that the drawer engages to pay the bona fide holder absolutely, and notupon a condition to pay upon presentment of maturity and if due notice ofpresentment and non-payment should be given.

    It is a check given by a borrower to a lender for the amount of a short loan, withthe understanding that it is not to be presented at the bank, but will be redeemed bythe maker himself when the loan falls due and which understanding is evidenced bywriting the word "memorandum,""memo"or"mem"on the check.

    9. Forged Checks (2006 BEQ)

    The legal consequences when a bank honors a forged check are as follows:

    When Drawers Signature is Forged: Drawee-bank by accepting the check cannotset up the defense of forgery, because by accepting the instrument, the draweebank admits the genuineness of signature of drawer (BPI Family Bank vs.Buenaventura G.R. no. 148196, September 30, 2005; Section 23, NIL)

    Unless a forgery is attributable to the fault or negligence of the drawerhimself, the REMEDY OF THE DRAWEE-BANK IS AGAINST THE PARTYRESPONSIBLE FOR THE FORGERY. Otherwise, drawee-bank bars theloss (BPI Family Bank vs. Buenaventura G.R. no. 148196,September 30, 2005)

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    31/32

    A drawee-bank paying on a forged check must be considered as paying outof its funds and cannot charge the amount to the drawe (SamsungConstruction Co. Phils., v. Far East Bank, G.R. No. 129015, August 13,2004)

    If the drawee-bank has charged drawers account, the latter can recover such

    amount from the drawee-bank (Associated ank v. court of Appeals, G.R.No. 107382, J anuary 31, 1996, Bank of P.I. v. Case MontessoriInternationale, G.R. No. 149454, May 28, 2004).

    However, the drawer may be precluded or stopped from setting up thedefense of forgery as against the drawee-bank, when it is shown that thedrawer himself had been guilty of gross negligence as to have facilitated theforgery (Metropolitan Waterworks v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-62943,143 SCRA 20, J uly 14, 1986).

    C. PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT

    (1) TIME

    Within what time a check must be presented

    A check must be presented for payment within a reasonable time after its issueor the drawer will be discharged from liability thereon to the extent of the loss causedby the delay. (Sec. 186, NIL) Hence, if no loss or injury is shown, the drawer is notdischarged.

    CRYSTAL v. CA1976

    Crystal used a check in paying the redemption price of the property sold atan execution sale. The value of the check had never been realizedbecause it had either been dishonored or become stale. The validity ofthe redemption is in question.

    HELD: If the check had been dishonored, the redemption is void. But if ithad only become stale through no fault of the redemptioner, then it wouldbe unfair to deprive him of the rights he had acquired as redemptioner,particularly if the value of the check has otherwise been received orrealized. There is a strong showing that the party had already been paidin full.

    VILLANUEVA VS. NITE,G.R. No. 148211, 25 July 2006

    Can the holder sue the drawee bank if the latter refuses payment of acheck notwithstanding sufficiency of funds?

    Held: NO. a check of itself does not operate as an assignment of anypart of the funds to the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank isnot liable to the holder, unless and until it accepts or certifies the check(Sec. 189). Thus, if a bank refuses to pay a check (notwithstanding thesufficiency of funds), the payee-holder cannot sue the bank. The payee-holder should instead sue the drawer who might in turn sue the bank.Section 189 is a sound law based on logic and established legalprinciples; no privity of contract exists between the drawee-bank and thepayee.

  • 7/28/2019 Kate Negotiable Instruments Law Real

    32/32

    Explain the meaning of check kiting

    It refers to the wrongful practice of taking advantage of the float, the time thatelapses between the deposit of the check in one bank and its collection at another.

    In anticipation of the dishonor of the check that was deposited, the original check willbe replaced with another worthless check (Notes and Cases on Banks, NegotiableInstruments and other commercial Documents, Aquino 2006 ed)

    (2) EFFECT OF DELAY

    Presentment should be made within a reasonable time (not more than 6 monthsfrom the date of issue) Beyond said period, it is unreasonable time and the checkbecomes stale and under Sec. 186 NIL the drawer will be discharged from liabilitythereon to the extent of the loss caused by the delay.

    ARCEO, JR. VS. PEOPLE OF THEPHILIPPINES,G.R. No. 142641 (17 July 2006)

    The check was presented to the drawee bank 120 days from the datethereof. Determine if the drawer has been discharged from the duty tomaintain sufficient funds therefore?

    HELD: NO. According to current banking practice, the reasonable periodwithin which to present a check to the drawee bank is six months;thereafter, the check becomes stale and the drawer is discharged from

    liability thereon to the extent of the loss caused by the delay. Thus,presentment of the check to the drawee bank 120 days (four months) afterits issue was still within the allowable period. The drawer was freedneither from the obligation to keep sufficient funds in his account nor fromliability resulting from the dishonor of the check.