karinay 234th cuse of action

8/11/2019 Karinay 234th Cuse of Action

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/karinay-234th-cuse-of-action 1/4

Attention bank of America legal department:

Pursuant to the following documents and instrument numbers recorded on the

aforementioned real property commonly known as: 6215 Gyral Drive Tujunga

CA 91042

APN: 2569-015-012

Arranged chronologically from the most recent document recorded on the

abovementioned property with each succession of documents recorded in the

county recorder’s office of, Los Angeles California constructing the true and

correct chain of title going back to the first aforementioned deed of trust

executed and recorded on May 19, 1999

Notice of trustee’s sale referencing trustee sell number 05 – SF – 110552

caused to be recorded by Regional trustee Service Corp. As a successor trustee

for a deed of trust executed, by vested owner. And trustee of the above

mentioned property recorded at June 14, 2004 as instrument number 04 150-

1449 which was modified under instrument number 05 298-5584 and further

modified as Instrument number of 2008 213-0223 of official records recorded in

the county border Office of Los Angeles state of California.

A notice of default and election to sell recorded 7-18-2011 instrument number

20110955886 caused to be recorded by regional trustee Service Corp. As

trustee on behalf of bank of America N/A as beneficiary referencing the above

mentioned property and the vested owners there in

Modification of security instrument recorded on 120420008 with instrument

number of 2008213-0223 amount of $151,000 in favor of bank of America N.A.

as beneficiary executed by the above mentioned as the owner of the

aforementioned property with dual notary seals fixed on the set document

Modification of deed of trust instrument number 05298 5584 in favor of bank of

America as beneficiary for the amount of $130,000 with tool notary seals are

fixed on the set document executed on 92305



Short form deed of trust instrument number 041501449 executed on June 3, 2004

bank of America as beneficiary for the sum of $100,000 by the aforementioned

vested owners of the sad properly

To be further referenced on the abovementioned short form deed of trust

executed by Six Rivers national bank on May 18, 1999 by truss tours Charles the

ball and Rico Matsushita “ for the mount of $260,000 with all provisions of the

same remaining intact

In addition the subsequent cause of action is instrument entitled “fictitious

deed of trust” essentially a blank document caused to record by bank of

America instrument number 991 334924 evidence in the security transfer on the

lean or obligation as set forth on the above mentioned property from Six Rivers

bank to bank of America via wales Fargo bank N/A The afore mentioned list of

documents’ constitutes a clear and concise chain of title originating by six

Reveres national bank for the month of $260,000 which initiated the foregoing

chain that is being carried forward through the life of this ownership to current

notice of trustee’s sale Therefore :

Dispute of DEBT

We are writing this document as an official request for

verification of Debt pursuant to the fair debt collection practices

act (15 USC 1692g ) the original vested owner of the above mentioned

property is officially disputing the following cause of action stated

on debt servicing transfer notice of the above mentioned document

Pursuant to the conditions and terms stated in the initial deed of trust there has been no

valid and true assignment recorded evidencing the transfer of lean from three Rivers

national bank to Wells Fargo bank N.A. And further to bank of America bank N.A. This

chain of title must be referenced by the deed of trust and all subsequent modifications

of the deeds as mentioned in the struments by the trustee on the notice of default and

the trustee sale agreement. As stated a true and correct chain of authority to be



exercised in following the foreclosure proceedings as indicated under the California

civil code section 2923.5

Furthermore pursuant to the deed of trust entitled security instrument which was altered

by the bank managers to read deed of trust instrument recorded at 12- 04-2008

instrument number 20082130223 the undersigned trustores did not execute thisdocument on the aforementioned date, yet a copy of their signatures was extracted

from a previous document and insert it into the abovementioned recorded document.

We have evidenced a variety of other violations on the same abovementioned

documents which we will itemize in their entirety with the lawsuit witch is intended to

initiated against BankAmerica N.A. as beneficiary and fidelity national as the trustee of

the above mentioned property

The imperfect chain of title which is evidenced by this series of modifications of

documents reported incorrectly in haphazardly fashion all of which reference to original

recorded deed of trust from 1999. yet not referenced in any of the foreclosureproceedings of the of the same

Bank of America N/A remains the beneficiary of all junior leans and therefore the

responsible party to initiate the reaffirmation of debit in accordions to the trastors

request

There is a long list of transgressions being committed by the beneficiary against the

trustor which constitute a break in the chain of title and therefore does not award the

right for foreclosure by bank of America N/A or their trusty therefore

Therefore we are demanding that you provide proof of the chain of title from theoriginal lender Six Rivers national bank as the original lender in the trust series throughout

the production of a copy of any current certified promissory note to name

endorsements as governed under UCC article 3- 205 regulations

Please be advised that under the Massachusetts supreme court ruling of U.S. bank vs.

ibanez that a “ blank assignment” is unacceptable proof of assignment in event of

foreclosure of trustee sell i.e. the fictitious deed of trust which is to evidence legal rights

asserted by the recorded deed of trust from Six Rivers bank

Please provide in writing affidavit under penalty of perjury from someone who has

firsthand knowledge of the fact that stipulates the following matters



The debt is valid and no discharge has occurred on the debt

No tax credit was received from the discharge if any of the debt that has not

been paid in full when the lean was secured iced that your company has

authority on behalf of Wells Fargo bank N.A. as well as six Rivers national bankwhich includes and references specifically My loan number that gives your

company the authority to collect the debt on their behalf.

An affidavit providing that six Rivers national bank does not under the original

deed have the authority to initiate foreclosure proceedings against my house forlack of payment

A true and correct deeds executed by the trust or with original signatures affix on

the same. And all subsequent orange and all modifications of the same. toverify the originality of the signatures and to further be examined four any

alterations of the same

Any and all correspondence with the bank indicating clears communication by

the trustor and the beneficiary as set forth under the California civil code section2923.5 this will indicate the cause for the declaration of default to the bare andeach declaration to be evidenced by the dates and the signature of the parties

declaring the same

If you’re unwilling or unable to provide proof of validation of the debt as requested

above within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 30 days than it will be

considered as admittance that the chain of the above mentioned title has been

broken and foreclose on the initial deed must have commenced from 1999 therefore it

is hereby acknowledged that the (a for men tend) debit is discharged along with any

and all indebtedness as set forth from the trust pursuant to section 15 UCC 1692 G

karinay 234th cuse of action

Documents