karen bekaert ghent university laboratory of chemical analysis dpt. veterinary public health and...

27
KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of the hot iron method for the detection of boar taint Prof. L. Vanhaecke Dr. F.A.M. Tuyttens F. Vandendriessche

Upload: prosper-brooks

Post on 25-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

KAREN BEKAERT

Ghent University

Laboratory of Chemical Analysis

Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

The use of the hot iron method for the detection of boar taint

Prof. L. Vanhaecke

Dr. F.A.M. Tuyttens

F. Vandendriessche

Page 2: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

OUTLINE

• CURRENT SITUATION

• OBJECTIVES

• PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

2 K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

Page 3: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

OUTLINE

• CURRENT SITUATION

• OBJECTIVES

• PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

3 K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

Page 4: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

CURRENT SITUATION

CURRENT SITUATION

HOT-IRON METHODSubjective method but

“easy” to use in slaughterhouseand gains fast results

Used by:Researchers

SlaughterhouseNO RESEARCH ON IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS

e.g. habituation, intra - and interreliability, position on the carcass, location in the slaughterhouse or in the laboratory

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 20184

Page 5: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• EXPERTS

CURRENT SITUATION

CURRENT SITUATION

• HOT-IRON

• USE OF THE HOT-IRON• First singe the fat and afterwards smell• Singe the fat and smell at the same time

HabituationType of hot-iron – temperature of the room/ fat

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 20185

Page 6: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

OUTLINE

• CURRENT SITUATION

• OBJECTIVES

• PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

6 K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

Page 7: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

“Evaluation” of the hot-iron method

» Technical aspects» Heating methods» Cleaning» Singeing» Inter variability between experts» Intra variability of the experts» Habituation» Distribution of the compounds in the carcass

OBJECTIVES

OBJECTIVES K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 20187

Page 8: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

OUTLINE

• INTRODUCTION

• OBJECTIVES

• PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

8 K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

Page 9: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• EXPERTS:

• SAMPLES: – Select and collect in slaughterhouse – Stored at -20°C

• HEATING METHODS:– Hot-iron– Pyropen

MATERIAL AND METHODS

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 20189

Page 10: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• SCORING: – Hot - iron• Continous

• Converted to 0-100 scale– Laboratorium analyses

strongpoor medium

no odour strongest imaginable

MATERIAL AND METHODS

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201810

Page 11: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• TECHNICAL ASPECTS– SAMPLES: 30 samples– HEATING METHODS

A. HOT-IRON: 1. Wattage: 30 – 40 – 50 – 80 2. Brand: Ersa

B. PYROPEN: Setting 1 & 3

– CONDITIONSA. Temperature of the sample: room or refrigeratorB. Temperature of the area: room of refrigerator

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TECHNICAL ASPECTS K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201811

Page 12: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

Maximum temperature

Theoretical(°C)

Measuring at room

temperature (22°C ± 1°C)

Measuring at refrigerator

temperature (5°C ± 1°C)

Hot-iron 30W 380 281 212

Hot-iron 40W 420 328 285

Hot-iron 50W 400 373 321

Hot-iron 80W 410 405 348

Pyropen 350 – 500(setting 1-5)

455(setting 3)

371(setting 3)

374(setting 1)

328(Setting 1)

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

TEMPERATURE DROPS BY MOVING THE HOT-IRON

12

Page 13: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

Measuring at room temperature (22°C)

Measuring at refrigerator temperature (5°C)

Sample at room temperature (22°C°)

Sample at refrigerator temperature (8°C)

Hot-iron 30W3.6 3.9 4.3 sec

45 40 32 °C

Hot-iron 40W2.1 2.6 2.7 sec

40 34 28 °C

Hot-iron 80W Burned Burned Burnedsec

°C

Pyropen (setting 1)2.5 2.7 4.1 sec

43 36 30 °C

Pyropen (setting 3) Burned2.5 2.9 sec

30 26 °C

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

TECHNICAL ASPECTS K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201813

Page 14: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• COMPARISION BETWEEN EXPERTS– Time of scoring• First singe the fat and afterwards smell

» For every hot-iron same time (3.4 sec ± 0.5)• Disadvantage: easier to burn the fat

• Singeing the fat and smell at the same time» Time depends on hot-iron wattage» Small differences between experts (± 0.5 sec)

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018TECHNICAL ASPECTS 14

Page 15: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• HEATING METHODS– SAMPLES: 32 samples– HEATING METHODS

A. MicrowaveB. Hot-iron: 30 WC. Pyropen: setting 3D. Pyropen + plate: setting 3

– CONDITIONS• Temperature of the sample and area: room

MATERIAL AND METHODS

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018HEATING METHODS 15

Page 16: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

FRIEDMAN TEST

PAIRWISE COMPARISON

(CORRELATION)

strongpoor medium

no odour strongest imaginable

P<0.001P1 P2 M HI

*

Microwave Hot-iron Pyropen

Hot-iron 0.43

Pyropen 0.53 0.50

Pyropen+plate 0.50 0.52 0.46

HEATING METHODS

P1: pyropen; P2: pyropen+plate; M: microwave; HI: hot-iron

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018HEATING METHODS 16

Page 17: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018HEATING METHODS

KENDALL’S CORRELATION COEFFICIENTMicrowave Hot-iron Pyropen Pyropen+plate

Indole 0.26 * 0.39 ** 0.38 ** 0.20

Skatole 0.25 * 0.40 ** 0.36 ** 0.16

Androstenone 0.34 ** 0.37 ** 0.34 ** 0.35 **

HEATING METHODS

Significant (* 0.05<p<0.01; ** 0.001<P<0.01)/ not significant

17

Page 18: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• CLEANING– SAMPLES: 120 samples– HEATING METHODS

• Hot-iron: 30 W

– CONDITIONS• Temperature of the sample and area: room

– METHODS• Cleaning the hot-iron with paper/ethanol• Not cleaning the hot iron

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CLEANING K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201818

Page 19: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• CLEANING

SIGNED RANK TEST

KENDALL’S CORRELATION COEFFICIENT

strongpoor medium

no odour strongest imaginable

P<0.001cleaning not cleaning

Cleaning Not cleaning

Indole 0.48 0.31

Skatole 0.48 0.29

Androstenone 0.30 0.27

CLEANING - SINGEING

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018CLEANING

p<0.001

19

Page 20: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• SINGEING– SAMPLES: 120 samples– HEATING METHODS

• Hot-iron: 30 W

– CONDITIONS• Temperature of the sample and area: room

– SINGEING ONE FAT SAMPLE TWO TIMES AT THE SAME PLACE

MATERIAL AND METHODS

1 and 2 singeing

SINGEING K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201820

Page 21: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• SINGEING

SIGNED RANK TEST

KENDALL’S CORRELATION COEFFICIENT

strongpoor medium

no odour strongest imaginable

P<0.01firstsecond

First second

Indole 0.49 0.30

Skatole 0.43 0.31

Androstenone 0.25 0.26

CLEANING - SINGEING

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018 SINGEING

p<0.001

21

Page 22: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

OUTLINE

• CURRENT SITUATION

• OBJECTIVE

• PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

22 K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

Page 23: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

TAKE HOME MESSAGES

TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 2018

• CHOICE OF HEATING METHOD– Significant difference between the methods– Highest values for microwave and hot-iron– Good correlation between the methods– Hot-iron and pyropen best correlation with compounds

• USE OF THE HOT-IRON– Carefully choose wattage (room and sample temperature)– Necessary to clean the hot-iron– Never singe on the same place

23

Page 24: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• Inter- and intra-variability of the experts statistics

• Variation of the concentration of indole, skatole and androstenone inside a carcass

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

TAKE HOME MESSAGES – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201824

Page 25: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

• Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT-Vlaanderen)

• Imperial Meat Products VOF

• VION Food Group (NL)

THANKS TO

THANKS TO K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201825

Page 26: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

THANKS TO

THANKS TO K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201826

Page 27: KAREN BEKAERT Ghent University Laboratory of Chemical Analysis Dpt. Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Faculty of Veterinary Medicine The use of

???

K.M. Bekaert – BOARS FOR 201827