kansas state report card november 2013 (revised december 5 th )

Kansas State Report CardKansas State Report Card November 2013 November 2013

(revised December 5th)

Kansas State Department of Educationwww.ksde.org

Kansas Student Population Trends(Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools)

2


Details of Student Population Trends

year Free & ReducedStudents w/ Disabilities

English Language Learners

2000 32.2 10.6

2001 33.2 10.8

2002 34.1 11.0

2003 35.9 11.6

2004 37.4 12.4 5.1

2005 38.5 12.8 5.5

2006 38.7 12.9 5.5

2007 38.9 12.4 7.1

2008 39.7 12.3 7.7

2009 42.7 12.7 8.0

2010 45.6 12.6 8.7

2011 47.4 12.6 9.4

2012 48.9 12.6 9.6

2013 49.6 12.7 10.03


261,164 Reading (Grades 3-8, HS)

260,653 Math (Grades 3-8, HS)

110,482 Science (Grades 4, 7, HS)

48,717 KELPA (Grades K-12 )

Subjects Assessed

4


Early Comments on Results

Graduation rates continue to increase, up from 83% to 84.9%, with the largest gains in our subgroups.

Attendance rates are high at 94.9% Participation rates on assessments remain very

close to 100%. For a second year in a row, student performance

on state Math and Reading assessments declined.

5


Reading

6


Exemplary

Exceeds Standard

Meets Standard

Approaches Standard

Academic Warning

Five Performance Levels

7


Reported percentages are totals of all students in the top three performance levels.

Example from Reading, All Students: Exemplary . . . . . . . 29.9 Exceeds Standard . . 29.5 Meets Standard . . . 25.3

% at Standard or Above = 84.7

Reporting “Standard & Above”

8


Reading Trends by Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

9


Reading – Performance Levels

10


All students Males & females Ethnic groups Free & reduced lunch Students with disabilities English Language Learners

Disaggregated Groups

11


Reading Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels, 2000 – 2013, (report card population)

12


Reading Gaps by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity: 2000 – 2013(percent proficient, all grades, report card population)

13


Math

14


Math Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

15


Math – Performance Levels

16

Kansas State Department of Educationwww.ksde.org17

17

Math Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels,2000 – 2013, (report card population)


Math Gap by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity, 2000 – 2012(report card population)

18


AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) is replaced with 4 AMO’s (Annual Measurable Objective’s)

1- Achievement measured by the API = Assessment Performance Index2- Growth3- Gap4- Reducing % Non-Proficient (RNP)

19


To encourage staff to help each student to the highest performance level possible, the new achievement measure awards 250 points each time a student moves up a proficiency level.

Exemplary 1,000

Exceeds Standard 750

Meets Standard 500

Approaching Standard 250

Academic Warning 0

20


performance levelpoints per

level# of

studentstotal points

exemplary 1,000 55 55,000

exceeds standard 750 90 67,500

meets standard 500 82 41,000

approaching standard 250 30 7,500

academic warning 0 4 0

totals 261 171,000

Assessment Performance Index (API) = 171,000 ÷ 261 = 655

How is the API calculated?

21


2222


Reading results using the new AMO Measures.


Reading Gap Measured by the API, 2009 – 2013, (all grades, report card population)

24


Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, Reading, Free & Reduced Trends, (report card population)


Trends, Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, Reading, by Ethnicity,(report card population)

26


Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, ELL & Students w/ Disabilities Trends, (report card population)


Math Results using the new AMO measures.


Math Gap Measured by the API, 2009 – 2013, (report card population)

29


Math Gap by Reducing Non-Proficient, Free & Reduced combined, 2009 – 2013, (report card population)

30


Trends, Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient by Ethnicity, 2009-2013(report card population)

31


State Subgroup Performance in Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient in Reading:

2013 AMO 2013 Actual

ResultAll Students ≥1.03 -1.97

Free and Reduced Lunch ≥1.67 -2.84

Students with Disabilities ≥2.28 -3.92

ELL ≥2.47 -3.62

African American ≥2.36 -3.31

Hispanic ≥1.84 -3.97

White ≥0.69 -1.4

Asian ≥0.90 -1.68

American Indian ≥1.27 -2.24

Multi ≥1.18 -1.78

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander ≥1.19 -3.532


3333


New, non-overlapping subgroup built for the ESEA waiver:The lowest-scoring 30 percent.Several advantages:Students are only counted once.Less bias against larger, more diverse schools.Stigma against particular groups reduced.All schools are compelled to help their lowest performing students.This measure captures more subgroup population students.

34


35


Reading Gap Trends as Measured by the Lowest Performing 30 Percent’s API:(report card population)

36


Math Gap Trends as Measured by the Lowest Performing 30 Percent’s API:(report card population)

37


Kansas Growth AMO:a relative measure

Kansas Growth AMO:a relative measure

To make the growth AMO, a school had to be at or above the 50th percentile

To make the growth AMO, a school had to be at or above the 50th percentile


Must make at least one of the 4 AMOs (achievement, gap reduction, reducing the percent below proficient, or growth) in reading and math

Participation must be ≥ 95% for All Students & all subgroups

K-8 schools must meet Attendance Requirements If high school, must make graduation goals for All

Students & All Subgroups

Expectations Under the New Measures:

39


Overall Results Under the New Measures:All Schools561 of 1,379 schools made progress. 40.7%818 schools did not. 59.3%Title I schools:205 made progress. 37% 349 did not. 63%Non-Title schools:356 schools made progress. 43%469 schools did not. 57%

40


Measure# of schools

in pool# making reading

# making math

How many met their achievement MO? 1,438 449 255

How many met their gap MO? 1,437 435 237

How many met the growth MO?

1,160 (no high schs) 592 615

How many met the RNP goal? 1,427 329 223

How many met their participation goal? 1,440 1,423 1,419

41

Numbers of Schools Making Their Measurable Objectives:


Graduation Results:

383 high schools 365 made the graduation

goals 18 did not

42


State Subgroup Performance in Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient in Math:

2013 AMO 2013 Actual

ResultAll Students ≥1.16 -6.57

Free and Reduced Lunch ≥1.80 -9.05

Students with Disabilities ≥2.69 -9.04

ELL ≥2.19 -11.13

African American ≥2.66 -8.91

Hispanic ≥1.84 -10.66

White ≥0.85 -5.35

Asian ≥0.63 -4.72

American Indian ≥1.54 -10.2

Multi ≥1.41 -7.32

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander ≥1.10 -10.7943


Grade 4

Grade 7

High School

Science – Grades Tested

44


Science

45


Science Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

46


Science – Performance Levels

47


To be highly qualified, a teacher must be “fully” licensed & must demonstrate subject matter competence.

Competence is demonstrated by:

Content major, or

PRAXIS II content test, or

Rubric (content hours, content workshops, experience & other PD related to content area).

Highly Qualified Teachers

48


Percentage of core classes taught by highly qualified teachers

2012 2013

Elementary Schools 97% 97%

Secondary Schools (middle, junior high and high schools)

93% 90%

Highly Qualified Teachers

49


2011 2012 2013

English/LA/Reading 97.6 94.3 91.4

Fine Arts: Music, Art, Theater 97.7 97.5 91.1

Foreign Language 97.9 98.3 91.8

Math 97.4 95.8 87.4

Natural Science 96.1 94.3 91.8

Social Studies, History, Government, Geography,

Economics97.9 96.1 92.1

Special Education 76.0 61.9 63.5

ESL/Bilingual 87.2 73.3 64.2

Percent of Classes Taught byHighly Qualified Teachers

50


Graduation Rate (H.S. & districts) Use the Adjusted four- and five-year cohort

formulas GED is not included At least 80% or• If ≥ 50% but < 80%, 3% more than previous year• If < 50%, 5% more than previous year

Attendance Rate Elementary school requirement 90% or improvement over last year

Other Measures

51


2012 2013

All Students 83.0 84.9

Free & Reduced Lunch 73.2 76.0

Students with Disabilities 73.6 77.1

ELL 70.5 74.2

African-American 72.4 75.9

Hispanic 73.2 76.4

Graduation Rate 4-yr. adjusted cohort graduation formula

52


2012 2013

All Students 95.2 94.9

Free & Reduced Lunch 94.3 94.0

Students with Disabilities 94.3 93.9

ELL 95.4 95.1

African-American 94.4 94.1

Hispanic 94.7 94.5

Attendance Rate

53


Questions

54

kansas state report card november 2013 (revised december 5 th )

Documents

state schools

state math

kansas state report

student performance

reading grades

public schools

math grades

orgreading trends