Upload File

k11_19810505.pdf

3
K. 11 Release Date: May 5 , 1981 PEBCiNl OF CHECK DOLLAbS HE LOO VEIL JAN 19o1 FEB 1981 MAR 1981 1Ar 12- MAR 18 MAS 19-MAB 25 MA2 2 6 - APR 1 APR 2-APR 8 APS 9-APR 15 PC? "KANK PCI HANK PCX ™FANK ?CT RANK £CT RAM PCT RANK PCT BANK PCT BOSTON 1,. 5 0 23 1. 33 25 1 . 4 1 24 1. 34 21 1,.34 14 1.59 15 1. 32 23 0 . 9 0 45 LEWISION 0 , . 00 48 0 . 0 0 43 0 . 0 0 48 0 . 0 0 4b 0 . . 00 47 0 . . 00 48 0 . GO 47 0 . 0 0 45 WINDSOR LOCKS 0 . . 53 39 0 . 9 6 32 0 . 2 3 42 0 . 2 9 39 0 . . 11 46 0 . . 03 47 0. 16 4 3 0 . 0 0 45 H2W YOSK L . 0 4 3 4 0 . 5 8 31 1 . 4 5 22 3 . 9 6 7 0 , . 62 29 0 . . 65 28 0 . 6 7 31 0 . 5 0 28 BUFFALO 1.. 4 4 25 0 . 9 5 34 1 . 7 4 17 4 . 0 4 6 2 . . 62 8 0.33 37 9 . 8 0 1 0 . 3 2 33 JEBICHO 1.. 3 6 2o 1 . 5 7 24 0 . 7 9 33 1 . 4 0 20 0 . . 35 36 0 . , 58 29 0 . 3 4 38 o . 3 7 31 ^ C3ANFORD 5 , . 21 f> 3 . l b 12 1 . 8 6 15 1 . 2 6 22 1 . . 64 10 6 , , 1 0 3 7 . 0 2 5 0 . 3 3 32 k UTICA 1.. 79 20 0 . 4 5 4 1 0 . 4 8 36 0 . 5 0 35 0 . . 44 31 0.50 32 0 . 3 3 39 0 . 2 2 39 PHILADELPHIA 7, . 56 1 00 18 3 . 3 6 4 1 . 3 8 11 2 . . 71 6 6 . , 81 2 3 . 6 9 8 2 . 8 3 9 CLEVELAND 2 . . 75 1J 3 . 9 4 / 2 . 7 5 8 1. 36 12 1..49 11 2.78 8 2. 16 18 2 . 5 7 12 CINCINNATI 2 . . 54 12 1 . d4 20 1 . 4 0 25 1. 44 18 1 . . 22 17 1 . . 22 16 1. 26 24 1 . 2 6 15 PITTSBURGH j . . 56 38 J . 2 b 44 0 . 4 2 38 0 . 5 9 34 0 . , 4b 30 0.28 38 0 . 2 7 41 0 . 2 1 40 COLUMBUS 5. . 42 5 4 . 4 6 5 4 . 2 7 1 5 . 4 5 4 4 . . 15 2 3 . . 44 6 4 . 5 5 6 4 . 0 0 7 RICHMOND 1., t>6 21 0 . 6 7 38 0 . 9 4 31 1. 21 24 0 . . 34 38 0 . , 89 21 0 . 9 5 28 0 . 8 3 23 BALTIMORE 0 . . 51 41 0 . 8 9 35 0 : 4 1 39 0 . 3 7 37 0 . . 42 34 0 . , 3 4 35 0 . 5 0 33 0 . 4 6 29 CHARLOTTE 1,. 1 5 29 2 . 2 0 17 0 . 2 0 43 0 . 1b 42 0 . . 12 44 0.14 43 0 . 3 5 37 0 . 2 3 38 COLUMBIA 2 . . 43 14 3 . 3 4 10 0 . 1 5 44 0 . 1 4 43 0 . . 1 5 41 0 . , 1 5 42 0. 15 44 0 . 2 0 41 ChARLES1CN 6 . . 34 4 1 . 0 1 30 3 . 0 0 5 1 1 . 5 4 1 0. .15 41 0 . . 1 4 43 0 . 0 0 47 0 . 1 4 42 ATLANTA 1.. 9 0 Id 3 . 2 5 11 0 . 4 3 37 0 . 4 3 36 0.44 31 0.28 38 2 . 2 4 15 0 . 3 1 34 BIBMINGHAM 2 . . 08 1 7 1 . 6 4 2 3 1 . 8 2 16 1 . 1 5 25 1..45 12 1 -. 6 8 13 1 . 5 3 21 1 . 2 4 16 JACKSONVILLE 0 . . 22 45 0 . 2 0 46 1 . 6 2 20 0 . 1 4 43 0, . 17 40 6 , . 83 1 0 . 1 8 42 0 . 2 4 37 NASHVILLE 1.. 12 31 1 . 3 0 26 1. 39 26 0 . 6 4 33 0 . . 67 27 3..97 5 1 . 9 8 19 0 . 7 5 25 NEM ORLEANS 1.. 6 3 22 1 . 3 2 21 1 . 9 7 12 1 . 8 2 14 1..39 13 3 , . 08 7 8 . 3 5 2 1 2 . 5 5 1 MIAMI 2 . . 52 13 54 4 2 . 9 0 6 5 . 3 1 5 1..33 15 1..09 19 0 . 6 4 32 U 5 5 13 CHICAGO 2 . . 30 15 1 . 7 4 22 1 . 9 0 14 1 . 8 3 13 1, . 22 17 2 . . 02 11 3 . 0 1 11 1 0 . 6 5 2 DETROIT 6 . . 65 3 b . 1 9 3 2 . 8 5 7 1 . 5 2 17 3 . . 11 4 1 . . 14 18 2 . 7 9 12 4 . 9 3 4 DBS KOINES 1, , 17 28 1 . 9 8 19 1. 18 29 1 . 1 5 25 1, . 08 21 1.07 20 1. 2b 24 1. 39 14 INDIANAPOLIS 2 . . 72 11 0 . 8 6 36 1 . 3 3 27 1 . 6 0 16 2 , . 6 6 7 1.,20 17 0 . 6 8 30 0 . 8 8 22 MILWAUKEE 1. , 10 32 4 . 3 9 6 1 . 0 2 30 1. 11 27 0 . . 96 23 0.05 22 1. 25 26 1 . 0 1 18 sr. LOUIS 0 , , 50 42 0 . 4 9 40 0 . 3 8 40 0 . 3 3 38 0 , . 35 36 0.34 35 0 . 4 1 36 0 . 5 4 27 k LITTLE BOCK 0.23 44 0 . 3 7 42 2- 22 11 7 . 5 8 3 0 . . 43 33 0 , . 1 6 41 7 . 4 2 3 0 . 2 9 35 W LOUISVILLE 0 . . 81 36 0- 74 37 0 . 8 2 32 1. 04 28 0 . . 89 24 0 . . 53 30 0 . 4 2 35 0 . 9 0 21 MEMPHIS 2.24 16 2 . 2 8 15 1 . 5 6 21 1. 22 23 3 . . 32 3 0 . . 73 26 3 . 6 4 9 0 . 7 4 26 MINNEAPOLIS 2 . . 78 9 2 . 8 3 13 2 . 2 6 10 1 . 0 3 29 2 . . 81 5 2.28 9 1 . 4 1 22 2 . 7 5 10 HELENA 0.65 37 1 . 2 8 27 0 . 3 1 41 0 . 2 7 40 0 . . 36 35 0.38 34 1 . 2 4 27 3 . 0 5 8 KANSAS CITY 0 . . 28 43 0 . 9 6 32 0 . 5 9 35 0 . 2 3 41 0 . 19 39 0 . , 77 25 0 . 3 2 40 0 . 2 6 36 DENVER 1 . , 13 30 2 . 2 8 15 1- 74 17 3 . 6 0 9 0 . , 84 25 0 . , 51 31 7 . 2 7 4 7 . 9 2 3 OKLAHOMA C I T Y 0.08 47 0 . 1 4 47 0 . 0 5 46 0 . 0 0 46 0 . 1 3 43 0. ,08 46 2 . 3 0 14 09 44 OMAHA 0. 53 39 0. 59 39 0. 66 34 0. 79 30 0. .67 27 0. 45 33 0. 46 34 0. 47 30 DALLAS 2 . 8 5 8 2 . 2 9 14 2 . 5 6 9 2 . 6 3 10 1 . . 2 4 16 1- 72 12 2 . 2 2 17 4 . 2 2 6 EL PASO 1 . 8 7 19 3. 38 8 1. 64 19 1. 42 19 1 . , 0 4 22 0. ,84 23 2 . 2 4 15 0. 97 19 HOUSTON 0. 13 46 0. 21 4 5 , 0. 14 45 0. 12 45 0. 12 44 0. 12 45 0. 15 44 0. 12 43 SAN ANTONIO 5 . 17 7 7 . 7 5 1 3 . 7 8 3 8 . 0 3 2 4 . , 2 7 1 1 . , 6 4 14 4 . 4 3 7 4 . 6 8 5 SAN FRANCISCO 6 . . 7 7 2 6 . 7 7 2 4 . 1 2 2 3 . 8 4 8 1 . 6 7 9 2 . 0 7 10 2 . 7 1 13 2 . 5 8 11 LOS ANGELES 1. 05 33 3 . 8 5 9 1 . 9 4 13 1 . 7 5 15 1. 17 19 4 . 3 2 4 1 . 5 5 20 0 . 9 2 20 PORTLAND 1. 29 27 1 . 1 0 2b 1 . 2 2 28 0. 66 32 U ,17 19 0. 80 24 3 . 2 2 10 -0* 8 2 , 24 SALT LAKE CITY 0. 92 35 0. 37 42 0. 03 47 0. 00 46 0. ,00 47 0. 17 40 0. 03 46 0 , 0 0 45 SEATTLE 1 . 5 0 23 1. 10 28 1 . 4 5 22 0. 73 31 0. 68 26 0. 72 27 0 . 9 5 28 1. 20 17 OVERALL SYSTEM 2 . 0 6 2- 0 0 1 . 5 3 1 . 9 5 1. 06 1 . 6 0 1 . 9 0 2 . 2 3 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Upload: fedfraser

Post on 20-Nov-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

Tags:

TRANSCRIPT

  • K. 11 R e l e a s e Date : May 5 , 1981

    PEBCiNl OF CHECK DOLLAbS HE LOO VEIL

    JAN 1 9 o 1 FEB 1 9 8 1 MAR 1 9 8 1 1Ar 1 2 - MAR 18 MAS 19-MAB 2 5 MA2 2 6 - APR 1 APR 2-APR 8 APS 9 - A P R 15 PC? "KANK P C I HANK PCX FANK ?CT RANK C T R A M PCT RANK PCT BANK PCT

    BOSTON 1, . 5 0 2 3 1 . 3 3 2 5 1 . 4 1 2 4 1 . 34 2 1 1, . 3 4 14 1 . 5 9 15 1 . 32 2 3 0 . 9 0 4 5 LEWISION 0 , . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 4 3 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 4 b 0 . . 0 0 4 7 0 . . 0 0 4 8 0 . GO 47 0 . 0 0 4 5 WINDSOR LOCKS 0. . 5 3 3 9 0 . 96 3 2 0 . 2 3 4 2 0 . 2 9 3 9 0 . . 1 1 4 6 0 . . 0 3 4 7 0 . 16 4 3 0 . 0 0 4 5

    H2W YOSK L . 0 4 3 4 0 . 5 8 3 1 1 . 4 5 2 2 3 . 9 6 7 0 , . 6 2 2 9 0 . . 6 5 2 8 0 . 6 7 31 0 . 5 0 28 BUFFALO 1. . 4 4 2 5 0 . 9 5 3 4 1 . 7 4 17 4 . 0 4 6 2 . . 6 2 8 0 . 3 3 37 9 . 8 0 1 0 . 3 2 3 3 J E B I C H O 1. . 3 6 2 o 1 . 5 7 2 4 0 . 7 9 33 1 . 4 0 20 0 . . 3 5 3 6 0 . , 5 8 2 9 0 . 3 4 3 8 o . 3 7 3 1

    ^ C3ANFORD 5 , . 2 1 f> 3 . l b 12 1 . 8 6 15 1 . 2 6 2 2 1 . . 6 4 10 6 , , 10 3 7 . 0 2 5 0 . 3 3 32 k UTICA 1. . 79 20 0 . 4 5 4 1 0 . 4 8 36 0 . 5 0 3 5 0 . . 4 4 3 1 0 . 5 0 3 2 0 . 3 3 3 9 0 . 2 2 3 9 P H I L A D E L P H I A 7, . 5 6 1 0 0 18 3 . 3 6 4 1 . 3 8 11 2 . . 7 1 6 6 . , 8 1 2 3 . 6 9 8 2 . 8 3 9 CLEVELAND 2 . . 7 5 1 J 3 . 9 4 / 2 . 7 5 8 1 . 3 6 12 1. . 4 9 11 2 . 7 8 8 2 . 16 18 2 . 5 7 12

    C I N C I N N A T I 2 . . 5 4 12 1 . d 4 2 0 1 . 4 0 2 5 1 . 4 4 18 1. . 2 2 17 1 . . 2 2 16 1 . 2 6 2 4 1 . 2 6 15 PITTSBURGH j . . 5 6 38 J . 2 b 4 4 0 . 42 3 8 0 . 5 9 34 0 . , 4 b 3 0 0 . 2 8 3 8 0 . 2 7 4 1 0 . 2 1 4 0 COLUMBUS 5 . . 42 5 4 . 4 6 5 4 . 2 7 1 5 . 4 5 4 4 . . 1 5 2 3 . . 4 4 6 4 . 5 5 6 4 . 0 0 7

    RICHMOND 1. , t>6 2 1 0 . 6 7 3 8 0 . 9 4 31 1 . 21 2 4 0 . . 3 4 3 8 0 . , 8 9 21 0 . 9 5 2 8 0 . 8 3 2 3 BALTIMORE 0 . . 5 1 4 1 0 . 8 9 3 5 0 : 4 1 3 9 0 . 3 7 37 0 . . 4 2 34 0 . , 34 3 5 0 . 5 0 3 3 0 . 4 6 29 CHARLOTTE 1, . 1 5 2 9 2 . 2 0 17 0 . 2 0 4 3 0 . 1b 4 2 0 . . 1 2 44 0 . 1 4 4 3 0 . 3 5 3 7 0 . 2 3 3 8 COLUMBIA 2. . 4 3 14 3 . 34 10 0 . 15 44 0 . 14 4 3 0 . . 15 4 1 0 . , 15 4 2 0 . 15 4 4 0 . 2 0 4 1 ChARLES1CN 6 . . 3 4 4 1 . 0 1 3 0 3 . 0 0 5 1 1 . 5 4 1 0. . 1 5 4 1 0 . . 14 4 3 0 . 0 0 4 7 0 . 1 4 4 2

    ATLANTA 1. . 9 0 Id 3 . 2 5 11 0 . 4 3 37 0 . 4 3 36 0 . 4 4 3 1 0 . 2 8 3 8 2 . 2 4 15 0 . 3 1 3 4 BIBMINGHAM 2. . 0 8 1 7 1 . 6 4 2 3 1 . 8 2 16 1 . 15 2 5 1. . 4 5 12 1-. 6 8 13 1 . 5 3 21 1 . 2 4 16 JACKSONVILLE 0 . . 2 2 4 5 0 . 2 0 4 6 1 . 6 2 2 0 0 . 14 4 3 0 , . 17 4 0 6 , . 8 3 1 0 . 1 8 4 2 0 . 2 4 3 7 NASHVILLE 1. . 12 31 1 . 3 0 2 6 1 . 3 9 2 6 0 . 6 4 33 0 . . 6 7 2 7 3. . 9 7 5 1 . 9 8 19 0 . 7 5 2 5 NEM ORLEANS 1. . 6 3 2 2 1 . 3 2 2 1 1 . 9 7 12 1 . 8 2 14 1. . 3 9 13 3 , . 0 8 7 8 . 3 5 2 1 2 . 5 5 1 MIAMI 2 . . 5 2 13 5 4 4 2 . 9 0 6 5 . 3 1 5 1. . 3 3 1 5 1. . 0 9 19 0 . 6 4 3 2 U 5 5 13

    CHICAGO 2 . . 3 0 15 1 . 7 4 2 2 1 . 9 0 14 1 . 8 3 13 1, . 2 2 17 2 . . 0 2 11 3 . 0 1 11 1 0 . 6 5 2 DETROIT 6 . . 6 5 3 b . 19 3 2 . 8 5 7 1 . 5 2 17 3 . . 1 1 4 1 . . 1 4 18 2 . 7 9 12 4 . 9 3 4 DBS KOINES 1, , 17 2 8 1 . 9 8 19 1 . 18 2 9 1 . 15 2 5 1, . 0 8 2 1 1 . 0 7 2 0 1 . 2 b 2 4 1 . 39 14 I N D I A N A P O L I S 2 . . 7 2 11 0 . 86 36 1 . 3 3 2 7 1 . 6 0 16 2 , . 6 6 7 1. , 2 0 17 0 . 6 8 3 0 0 . 8 8 2 2 MILWAUKEE 1 . , 10 32 4 . 3 9 6 1 . 0 2 30 1 . 11 2 7 0 . . 9 6 2 3 0 . 0 5 2 2 1 . 2 5 2 6 1 . 0 1 18

    s r . L O U I S 0 , , 5 0 42 0 . 4 9 4 0 0 . 3 8 4 0 0 . 3 3 3 8 0 , . 3 5 3 6 0 . 3 4 3 5 0 . 4 1 3 6 0 . 5 4 27 k L I T T L E BOCK 0 . 2 3 4 4 0 . 37 4 2 2 - 2 2 11 7 . 5 8 3 0 . . 4 3 3 3 0 , . 16 4 1 7 . 4 2 3 0 . 2 9 3 5 W L O U I S V I L L E 0 . . 8 1 3 6 0 - 7 4 37 0 . 8 2 3 2 1 . 0 4 2 8 0 . . 8 9 2 4 0 . . 5 3 30 0 . 4 2 3 5 0 . 9 0 2 1

    MEMPHIS 2 . 2 4 16 2 . 2 8 15 1 . 5 6 2 1 1 . 2 2 2 3 3 . . 3 2 3 0 . . 7 3 2 6 3 . 6 4 9 0 . 7 4 26 MINNEAPOLIS 2 . . 7 8 9 2 . 8 3 13 2 . 2 6 10 1 . 0 3 2 9 2 . . 8 1 5 2 . 2 8 9 1 . 4 1 2 2 2 . 7 5 10

    HELENA 0 . 6 5 3 7 1 . 2 8 2 7 0 . 3 1 4 1 0 . 2 7 4 0 0 . . 3 6 3 5 0 . 3 8 3 4 1 . 2 4 2 7 3 . 0 5 8 KANSAS CITY 0 . . 2 8 4 3 0 . 9 6 3 2 0 . 5 9 3 5 0 . 2 3 4 1 0 . 19 3 9 0 . , 7 7 2 5 0 . 3 2 4 0 0 . 2 6 36

    DENVER 1 . , 1 3 3 0 2 . 2 8 1 5 1 - 7 4 17 3 . 6 0 9 0 . , 8 4 2 5 0 . , 5 1 3 1 7 . 2 7 4 7 . 9 2 3 OKLAHOMA CITY 0 . 0 8 47 0 . 14 4 7 0 . 0 5 4 6 0 . 0 0 4 6 0 . 13 4 3 0 . , 0 8 4 6 2 . 3 0 14 0 9 4 4 OMAHA 0 . 5 3 3 9 0 . 5 9 3 9 0 . 6 6 34 0 . 7 9 3 0 0 . . 6 7 2 7 0 . 4 5 3 3 0 . 4 6 3 4 0 . 4 7 3 0

    DALLAS 2 . 8 5 8 2 . 2 9 14 2 . 5 6 9 2 . 6 3 10 1 . . 2 4 16 1 - 72 12 2 . 2 2 17 4 . 2 2 6 EL PASO 1 . 8 7 19 3 . 38 8 1 . 6 4 19 1 . 4 2 19 1 . , 0 4 2 2 0 . , 8 4 2 3 2 . 2 4 15 0 . 9 7 19 HOUSTON 0 . 13 46 0 . 2 1 4 5 , 0 . 14 4 5 0 . 12 4 5 0 . 12 4 4 0 . 12 4 5 0 . 1 5 4 4 0 . 1 2 4 3 SAN ANTONIO 5 . 17 7 7 . 7 5 1 3 . 7 8 3 8 . 0 3 2 4 . , 2 7 1 1 . , 6 4 14 4 . 4 3 7 4 . 6 8 5

    SAN FRANCISCO 6 . . 7 7 2 6 . 7 7 2 4 . 12 2 3 . 8 4 8 1 . 6 7 9 2 . 0 7 1 0 2 . 71 1 3 2 . 5 8 11 LOS ANGELES 1 . 0 5 3 3 3 . 8 5 9 1 . 9 4 1 3 1 . 7 5 15 1 . 17 19 4 . 3 2 4 1 . 5 5 2 0 0 . 9 2 2 0 PORTLAND 1 . 2 9 2 7 1 . 10 2 b 1 . 2 2 2 8 0 . 6 6 3 2 U , 1 7 19 0 . 8 0 2 4 3 . 2 2 10 -0* 8 2 , 2 4 SALT LAKE C I T Y 0 . 9 2 3 5 0 . 3 7 4 2 0 . 0 3 4 7 0 . 0 0 4 6 0 . , 0 0 4 7 0 . 1 7 4 0 0 . 0 3 4 6 0 , 0 0 4 5 SEATTLE 1 . 5 0 2 3 1 . 10 2 8 1 . 4 5 2 2 0 . 7 3 31 0 . 6 8 2 6 0 . 7 2 2 7 0 . 9 5 2 8 1 . 2 0 17

    OVERALL SYSTEM 2 . 0 6 2 - 0 0 1 . 5 3 1 . 9 5 1 . 0 6 1 . 6 0 1 . 9 0 2 . 2 3

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • PERCENT OF CHECK VOLUME

    JAN 1981 FEB 1 9 8 1 MAR 1 9 0 1 MAR 12-PCT RANK PCT RANK PCT RANK teET

    BOSTON 1 . 97 24 1 . 36 3 2 ~ 1 . 7 7 2 7 1 . 6 3 LEfclSTON 0 . 0 0 4A 0 . 0 1 4 8 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 WINDSOR LOCKS 1 . 26 33 2 . 0 8 24 0 . 56 41 0 . 3 0

    NEW YORK 4 . 2 5 10 4 . 97 5 6 . 73 2 1 2 . 7 3 BUFFALO 1 . 25 32 1 . 5 3 2 9 0 . 3 6 46 0 . 3 7

    ^ ^ E t l C H O 1 . 24 34 1 . 52 30 0 . 6 5 39 1 . 19 ^ P c f l A t J F O H D 5 . 97 4 5 . 4 8 3 2 . 78 14 1 . 4 1

    OTIC A 1 . 6 6 27 0 . 94 37 0 . 8 0 35 0 . 82 PHILADELPHIA 7 . 7 2 2 2 . 50 2 3 3 . 6 9 8 2 . 31 CLEVELAND 0 . 44 4 5 0 . 19 4 6 8 . 6 9 1 1 3 . 54

    CINCINNATI 3 . 90 14 3 . 11 16 2 . 15 22 1 . 86 PITTSBURGH 2 . 0 5 23 0 . 9 8 3 6 2 . 82 13 5 . 22 COLUMBUS 4 . 2 3 11 3 . 34 13 3 . 46 9 3 . 65

    RICHMOND 4 . 34 9 2 . 9 3 19 2 . 76 15 2 . 5 3 BALTIMORE 0 . 6 5 40 1 . 13 33 0 . 55 42 0 . 53 CHARLOTTE 4 , 74 3 3 . 05 17 0 . 6 5 39 u . 54 COLUMBIA 2 . 4 6 21 4 . 91 7 0 . 40 4 5 0 . 59 CHARLESTON 5 . 4 3 6 0 . 99 4 0 2 . 32 20 9 . 0 3

    ATLANTA 3 . 30 16 4 . 54 9 1 . 00 32 1 . 38 BIRMINGHAM 2 . 56 20 1 . 46 31 1 . 85 2 5 1 . 24 JACKSONVILLE 0 . 12 47 0 . 12 47 0 . 9 3 3 3 0 . 07 NASHVILLE 1 . 37 2b 2 . 0 3 2 5 1 . 6 6 2 9 1 . 39 NEW ORLEANS 1 . 3 3 31 1 . 72 2 6 2 . 2 5 21 2 . 18 MIAMI 1 . 5 7 2ti 3 . 14 15 3 . 30 10 3 . 5 5

    CHICAGO 6 . 4 8 3 2 . 9 3 1% 6 . 54 3 6 . 6 7 DETROIT 1 0 . 72 1 1 1 . 04 1 4 . 81 6 2 . 77 DBS MOINES J . 86 15 4 . 97 5 5 . 70 4 5 . 46 INDIANAPOLIS 4 . 10 12 1 . 09 34 2 . 50 18 2 . 5 3 MILWAUKEE

    LOUIS 2 . 43 22 7 . 5 0 2 3 . 10 1 1 2 . 9 6 MILWAUKEE

    LOUIS a . 74 39 0 . 30 4 2 0 . 77 36 0 . 7 8 LITTLE ROCK 0 . 54 42 0 . 34 41 2 . 7 a 15 9 . 4 3 LOUISVILLE i . 19 36 1 . 08 3 5 1 . 14 31 1 . 3b MEMPHIS 2 . 60 19 2 . 5 7 22 1 . 3 5 2 5 1 . 4 8

    MINNEAPOLIS 3 . 93 13 3 . 9 5 11 3 4 7.5 1 1 . 54 HELENA 1 . 36 30 2 . 91 2 0 0 . 74 37 0 . 85

    KANSAS CITY 0 . 49 44 1 . 6 7 27 0 . 71 3d 0 . 38 DENVER 1 . 39 29 2 . 6 1 2 1 1 . 89 24 3 . 62 OKLAHOMA CITY 0 . 6 1 41 0 . 6 3 44 0 . 54 4 3 0 . 40 OMAHA 1. 02 37 0 . 94 3 7 0 . 9 3 33 0 . 9 3

    DALLAS 5 , 78 5 4 . 6 5 3 5 . 17 i 5 . 64 EL PASO 1 . 94 25 3 . 70 12 1 . 7 5 2d 2 . 54 HOUSTON 0 . 53 43 0 . 71 4 3 0 . 52 44 0 . 4 6 SAN ANTONIO 2 . 94 13 4 . 15 10 2 . 7 5 17 6 . 53

    SAN FRANCISCO r . 22 7 3 . 1b 14 2 . 9 7 12 2 50

    LOS ANGELES 1 . 20 35 5 . 3 4 2 . 4 7 19 1. 4 5 PORTLAND 1. 02 37 0 . 92 39 1 . 5 1 30 0 . 71 SALT LAKE CITY 0 . 41 ib 0 . 33 4 5 0 . 2 4 47 0 . 2 3 SEATTLE i . 12 17 1 . 66 2 8 1 . 31 2 3 1 , 31

    OVERALL SYSTEM 3 . 22 2 . 95 2 . 84 3 . 33

    liAR 18 MAR 1 9 - MAR 2 5 MAR %6- APR 1 APR 2 - APR 8 APR 9 - A P S 15 RANK PCT RANK PC'I RANK PCT RANK PCT BANK

    22 1 . 9 2 16 1 . 6 3 20 1 . 5 9 27 0 . 0 0 4 6 4 8 0 . 0 0 48 0 . 0 0 48 0 . 0 0 48 0 . 0 0 4 6 4 5 0 . 14 4 6 0 . 0 9 4 7 0 . 1 5 4 6 0 . 0 0 4 6

    2 4 . 6 1 6 4 . 7 5 7 4 . 0 5 12 3 . 7 8 10 44 0 . 4 5 39 0 . 4 3 4 0 0 . 3 3 42 0 . 2 5 42 32 0 . 3 5 4 3 0 . 4 0 41 0 . 3 6 41 u . 2 9 40 26 2 . 3 4 14 9 . 15 3 1 0 . 5 9 1 0 . 6 1 3 3 35 0 . 6 8 32 0 . 7 6 30 0 . 6 7 3 5 0 . 3 9 36 19 3 . 0 5 13 1 1 . 0 4 2 7 . 0 8 5 4 . 5 2 9

    1 8 . 6 2 1 5 . 8 7 4 6 . 0 3 8 5 . 3 2 6 21 1 . 9 0 17 1 . 4 7 21 2 . 0 6 22 1 . 2 5 20

    9 3 . 16 12 0 . 9 5 2 8 0 . 3 2 4 3 0 . 3 0 39 10 3 . 6 7 10 3 . 11 12 4 . 0 3 13 3 . 2 9 12 16 1 . 3 2 22 1 . 6 8 19 3 . 3 8 16 3 . 4 7 11 40 0 . 5 5 36 0 . 4 9 3 8 0 . 6 5 36 0 . 6 3 30 3 9 0 . 4 4 4 0 0 . 5 1 37 0 . 8 4 34 0 . 5 4 34 38 0 . 3 8 42 0 . 3 8 42 0 . 5 b 37 0 . 3 9 36

    4 0 . 3 9 4 1 0 . 2 4 45 0 . 1 6 45 0 . 1 3 4 5 28 0 . 6 7 3 3 0 . 3 1 4 3 3 . 3 9 15 0 . 2 8 41 31 1 . 4 1 21 1 . 3 8 22 1 . 2 3 2 9 1 . 1 9 2 3 47 0 . 0 8 47 4 . 2 0 9 0 . 0 9 47 0 . 1 9 44 27 1 . 3 2 22 2 . 9 5 13 2 . 9 4 19 1 . 5 2 18 20 1 . 5 8 19 3 . 6 4 11 7 . 9 0 4 1 0 . 6 3 2 12 1 . 2 3 2 5 0 . 7 0 33 0 . 4 5 39 2 . 8 0 13

    5 3 . 7 4 9 1 1 . 8 7 1 9 . 5 9 2 2 9 . 1 2 1 14 5 , 6 3 2 1 . 7 6 18 5 . 7 4 9 7 . 0 6 3

    8 4 . 8 5 5 5 . 5 1 5 6 . 2 4 7 6 . 1 7 4 16 5 . 6 0 3 2 . 5 8 14 1 . 11 30 1 . 2 5 20 13 4 . 8 9 4 1 . 13 24 4 . 5 4 11 1 . 0 1 24 36 0 . 6 9 3 1 0 . 6 4 35 0 . 9 0 32 1 . 0 1 24

    3 0 . 6 2 35 0 . 6 6 34 9 . 0 0 3 0 . 5 2 35 2 9 1 . 1 5 26 1 . 0 7 2 5 0 . 9 7 31 1 . 3 2 19 24 3 . 9 3 8 0 . 9 7 27 5 . 5 1 10 0 . 8 6 27 23 4 . 3 1 7 3 . 6 6 10 1 . 7 1 26 2 . 7 9 14 34 0 . 5 3 38 0 . 9 9 26 1 . 7 6 24 5 . 8 3 5 43 0 . 3 5 4 3 0 . 3 1 43 0 . 3 7 40 0 . 3 4 38 11 0 . 9 7 29 0 . 7 1 32 6 . 9 1 6 4 . 9 5 8 42 0 . 6 7 33 0 . 5 4 3 6 3 . 3 7 17 0 . 6 3 30 3 3 1 . 0 7 2 3 0 . 9 0 29 0 . 8 5 3 3 0 . 8 2 2 8

    7 2 . 1 3 15 4 . 5 4 8 3 . 12 18 5 . 0 3 7 15 1 . 0 9 27 2 . 1 0 16 1 . 7 3 2 5 2 . 0 6 17 41 0 . 5 4 37 0 . 4 6 39 0 . 5 2 38 0 . 6 3 3t>

    6 3 . 3 7 11 2 . 4 3 15 3 . 7 1 14 0 . 7 3 29 18 1 . 7 2 Id 1 . 9 7 17 2 . 1 3 21 2 . 2 9 16 2 5 1 . b 6 20 5 . 4 0 6 1 . 8 1 23 1 . 2 5 20 37 0 . 7 5 30 0 . 7 4 31 2 . 4 3 2 0 0 . 9 6 26 46 0 . 2 3 4 5 0 . 1 9 46 0 . 2 3 44 0 . 2 0 4 3 30 1 . 2 4 24 1 . 2 5 23 1 . 3 6 2 8 2 . 3 1 15

    2 . 2 5 3 . 2 9 3 . 3 3 4 . 6 4

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • DATA ERROR EXCEPTION REPORT

    DATA FOS THE OFFICES LISTED ON THIS PAGE FOR THE STATEMENT WEEK BEGIUSING 8 1 / 0 4 / 0 9 ARE EITHER HISSING OR INCORRECT. THE S T A T I S T I C S AND BANKINGS ON THE ACCOMPANYING REPORTS ARB AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.

    OFFICE CODE AND NAME

    0 1 0 BOSTON

    0 1 2 WINDSOR LOCKS

    0 2 4 UTICA

    A CHECK HAS BEEN MADE ONLY ON KEY DATA FIELDS WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE ACCOMPANYING RANKINGS FOR THE LATEST REPORTED WEEK SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS SHOULD REVIEW PREVIOUS EDIT REPORTS FOR WARNING MESSAGES AND ACCURACY OF REPORTED FIGURES.

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


2281.1.pdf · PDF file

PDF (06_Appendix3.pdf)

PDF PDF PDF - WMMI.net · 2016-08-28 · PDF PDF PDF 2016-08-28, BarcampGR11 Adam Tauno Williams

PDF (dePencier_rd_1965.pdf)

cap8.pdf · PDF file

PDF VERSION BY · PDF filePDF VERSION BY PDF VERSION BY PDF VERSION BY

4AAH1007_71550 4AAH1007_71550.pdf 4AAH1007_71550.pdf 4AAH1007_71550.pdf 4AAH1007_71550.pdf

PDF (Schaefer_pc_1969.pdf)

Full page photodatarecoverypune.net/pdf/overwritten case studies...shalbin14.PDF shalbinIS.PDF shalbin16.PDF shalbin20.PDF shalbin22.PDF shalbin23.PDF shalbin24. PDF X Size 39, 620

PDF version PDF

Electronic Signatures & PDF - Planet PDF - The PDF User Community

scan0083.pdf scan0084 Care Plan.pdf · scan0083.pdf scan0084.pdf scan0085.pdf scan0086.pdf. scan0087.pdf scan0088.pdf scan0089.pdf. How the length of the commute would impact the

ชียงใหม่.pdf · PDF file

2017-2018.pdf · PDF

1996.pdf · PDF file

PDF (Cummings_be_1962.pdf)

PDF Compressor Pro - core.ac.uk · PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF Compressor Pro. PDF

1_2015.pdf · PDF file

PK45000.pdf · PDF file

132.pdf · PDF file

pdf (1).pdf

13.2.pdf · PDF

PDF - library.cm.mahidol.ac.thlibrary.cm.mahidol.ac.th/librarybak/images/pdf/EndnoteX8.pdf · ลักษณะที่มหาวิทยาลัยบอกรับเรียกว่า

341.pdf · PDF file

ประกาศผลสอบ.com/pdf/2561/1547182481.pdf · PDF file

cc24 pdf(1).pdf

Page 1 of 3 - thelawsalon.net · 1 cal CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIONS26 ... WEST'S CALIFORNIA DIGEST crim Law vol 14B pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf pdf Misc

entrate555.pdf · PDF file

PDF 51.pdf

pdf akuntanasi2.pdf

narratividadeBertrand (PDF).pdf

scan0083.pdf scan0084 - Crescent Public Schools Care Plan.pdfscan0083.pdf scan0084.pdf scan0085.pdf scan0086.pdf scan0087.pdf scan0088.pdf scan0089.pdf How the length of the commute

smt1-2015.pdf · PDF

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: ...neurosurgery.dergisi.org/pdf/pdf_JTN_345.pdf · PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: . Turkish Neurosurgery 8: 63 - Effects

PDF Example - PDF Bookmarks - novaPDF - Create PDF · PDF filePDF files are compact and complete, ... (you can download it from ) ... pdf example, pdf bookmarks, pdf,