k-12 physical education curriculum review committee · k-12 physical education curriculum review...
TRANSCRIPT
K-12 Physical Education
CURRICULUM REVIEW
COMMITTEE
Members of the committee
Brandon Esparza, Longfellow Elementary
School
Tracy Mattson, Maya Angelou Elementary
School
Rebecca Willoughby, Emerson Elementary
School
Shannon Powers, McLoughlin Middle School
JaiLynn Stoker, Ochoa Middle School
Teresa Chavez, Pasco High School
Julie Stadelman, Chiawana High School
Joseph Emerson, Pasco High School
Process for Selection
1. Pre-Screening Critical Criteria National Physical Education Scope and Sequence
State Standards
SHAPE America Scope and Sequence
Physical Education Curriculum Assessment
Tool:
1. K-6
2. 7-8
3. 9-12
Scored strengths and
weaknesses for each of the
materials for each level.
Process (continued)…
• Worked as grade levels• Determined strengths and weaknesses
for each material
• 5 for Life and SPARK earned highest scores• All other sources did not fit committee
requirements
PARENT SURVEYS:
• The results from parent surveys indicated:
• Strong desire for children to understand fitness concepts
• Strongly want regular engagement for their students
• Want swim team/pool
STAFF SURVEYS:Teacher wants:Teacher FriendlyEngaged StudentsState AlignedGrade Level Appropriate
STAFF SURVEYS:
Teacher needs:
Space
Equipment
Technology
Selections:
SPARK) :
Covers Standards 1, 2, 4, and part of 5.
K-12 materials—Provides teacher support in a clear and concise manner
Leadership opportunities, Character building, and Cooperative Learning
Spanish Materials
Selections:5 for Life
• Fitness components—fills the missing components of SPARK
• Standards 3 and 5
• Aligned to Fitness standards both state and national
• K-12 alignment
• Uses the district adopted fitness testing
Peer Review Feedback: Elementary:
Manual is easy to follow.
Aligned to state standards
Grade Level appropriate materials
Can be adjusted for adaptive classes
Middle School
Teachers will need to change the units for adapted
PE
Both sets of materials are user friendly
Shows different approaches to teach the units
Good that two curriculums compliment each other
to address all the standards.
Peer Review Feedback:
Peer Review Feedback: High School
Materials were engaging
Captures student interest
Teacher manuals are teacher friendly and easy to
navigate
Provide adequate support for differentiation
Provide cross curriculum opportunity
Bias Screening
Did not apply to the PE curriculum—
as there are no student materials—
just the teacher manuals
Next steps:
Rigorous Curriculum Design
Planning ongoing professional
development
Scope and Sequence
Look at equality of equipment needs and
budgetary needs
Recommendation:
The Physical Education
Curriculum Review Committee is
seeking a motion to recommend
the adoption of SPARK and 5 for
Life to the Pasco School Board for
use in grades K-12.
From Abbey Garza:
Both curriculums work
perfect for the philosophy
of the PSD PE department.
They will allow us to teach
ALL standards in a fun, fresh
and interactive way.
Questions: