june weir foi/copyright/records manager march 2015
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
June WeirFOI/Copyright/Records Manager
March 2015
![Page 2: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Copyright
• Copyright protects the rights of creators• Literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works,
sound recordings, films or broadcasts • Typographical arrangements of published
editions• It is automatic, no need to:– Register the work– Display © symbol
![Page 3: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Copyright
• Copyright owner– Creator of original material recorded in a
permanent format• Seems straight forward…….– Oscars awards (2014) – who owns DeGeneres’
selfie?– http://
ipkitten.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/copyright-related-question-right-from.html
![Page 4: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Copyright
• Acts restricted by copyright– The owner exclusive right;• Copy the work• Issue copies to the public• Perform, show or play the work in public• Broadcast the work • Make an adaptation of the work
– Infringement to carry out restricted act:• Whole or any substantial part of work• without licence/permission
![Page 6: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Copyright
What is substantial? Undefined No magic formula Consider quality as well as quantity
Case LawFour lines from a 32 line poem? In Kipling v Genatosan [1917-23] MacG Cop Cas 203, the court held that reproduction of 4 lines from Kipling’s 32 line poem “If” amounted to copyright infringement.
![Page 7: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Provisions that allow a certain amount of copying• Thesis - what are they?– Copying and use of extracts of works (educational
establishments)– Criticism, review, quotation and parody– Non-commercial research and private study– Illustration for instruction
• All subject to Fair Dealing• All require sufficient acknowledgement (title,
description, author)
Permitted Acts
![Page 8: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Not defined in the legislation– “Dealing” a form of general behaviour– “Fair” can only be decided in a court of law
• Subject to challenge• Generally accepted to mean general
permission to copy as long as:– The act of copying will not harm or prejudice the
legitimate interests of the rights holder.
What does Fair Dealing mean?
![Page 9: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• How would a fair minded and honest person have dealt with the work?
• How would you feel if it was your work being copied?• Will using the work affect the market of the original
work?• Does the use of the work act as a substitute causing the
owner to lose revenue?• Is the amount being used reasonable and appropriate?
Fair Dealing – what to consider?
![Page 10: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Original Thesis– unpublished work– Purposes of examination
• Section 32: Illustration for Instruction– Covers examination use– Reproduction of third party material – Fair Dealing/non-commercial purpose– Accompanied by acknowledgement
Thesis
![Page 11: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Copyright - Thesis
• What constitutes a published thesis?– Whole or part of thesis is made available to the public– Print, electronic or in a repository
• What does this mean?– Section 32 exception no longer applies– Permission for use of third party material– Or submit an edited version for placing in the
repository– Or???
![Page 12: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Copyright – Thesis
• Does another statutory exception apply?– Private study– Research for a non-commercial purpose
• Criticism, review, quotation and news reporting (S30)– All types of work– Fair Dealing– Reasonable and proportionate
• E.g. amount quoted is no more than is required
– Accompanied by sufficient acknowledgement– Work already made available to the public
Not a right to use but a legal defence should use be challenged
![Page 13: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Copyright – Thesis
• UK Case relevant to fair dealing provisions– Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Book Co [1983] FSR 545:
Defendant copied and imported adaptation of play from claimant’s O level study notes for use in exam preparation. Claimed defence of fair dealing for criticism and review purposes.
– No defence found under fair dealing – Court found: (i) no criticism and review involved; (ii)
insufficient acknowledgement;
Underlying rationale • use will harm the rights or prejudice the rights holder;
![Page 14: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Copyright – Thesis
Consider:• Is third party material being used?• How old is it?– Duration – copyright lasts for fixed periods of time• Literary, dramatic, musical, films – 70 years• Sound Recordings – 50 years• Published Editions – 25 years
![Page 15: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Copyright – Thesis
• Consider:– Does a statutory permission apply?– Is permission for use of third party material
needed• Template letter• University Website: http
://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/students/rules/copyright/
![Page 16: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Copyright - Thesis
Golden Rules• Plan Ahead• Develop good habits• Give plenty of time to consider all options• Does Fair Dealing apply• Seek permission as you go along – in writing• Keep records safe
![Page 17: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Copyright - Thesis
Where permission is not granted• No response = No permission• Decide how mange this• Embargo electronic deposit• Prepare an edited version for placing in
Repository
![Page 18: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Useful Links Information available on University’s website at:
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/students/rules/Copyright/
Guidance Note - Overview of copyright What material it covers Duration Use of Third Party Material Contact numbers Template permission letter
Copyright User online resource - http://copyrightuser.org/ Intellectual Property Office - https://www.gov.uk/intellectual-property/copyright Intellectual Property Office training tool - http://www.ipo.gov.uk/blogs/iptutor /
![Page 19: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Useful Links
Creative Commons - http://creativecommons.org• Copyright licences designed online environment• Standardised• Specific terms and conditions• Copyright owner retains ownership but grants permission under
conditions to license to anyone, anywhere to use• Useful CC FAQ - https://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ
Information sourced from internet:• Check terms and conditions carefully
![Page 20: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
A few misconceptions?
All information available on the Internet is free to use.
There isn’t a Copyright symbol or notice displayed so shouldn’t be a problem to use it.
It’s almost impossible to prove copyright infringement.
Copyright law only applies if I copy the work word for
word.
I have only used a small extract and properly referenced the source.
![Page 21: June Weir FOI/Copyright/Records Manager March 2015](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d8b5503460f94a725b9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Any questions