june 23, 2015 v 1 final spring st motion special grand jury pdf

2
 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA  _______  J AN I CE WOL K G R E NA DI E R  Pr o se Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 1:14 - cv - 00827 No. 15-1169 BWW LAW GR OUP BWW LAW GROUP HOWARD N. BI E RMAN, E QUITY TRUSTEE S, LLC    MA R K R. GAL B R AI TH    L o st Li cense , WEL LS F ARGO B AN K OF AM E R ICA , f/ k/ a - as su cc e ss o r-i n-int e re st to L a SAL LE B AN K , OCWE N LOAN SERVI CI NG LLC   - Defendants, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities. MOTION TO IMMEDIATELY HAVE A SPECIAL GRAND JURY CONVENYED FOR INVESTIGATION INTO THE CRIMINAL ACTS AND ACTIONS BY THIS COURT, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS ET AL INVESTIGATGATION TO BE BY A NON-PARTISON GROUP OF CITIZENS WITH PLAINTIFF BEING ALLOWED TO TESTIFY TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT AND ELECTED OFFICIALS MOTION TO HEARD BY THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THIS COURT ON JULY 10, 2015 Comes Now Plaintiff requests the Chief Judge to hear: this Motion and Motion for Judge Brinkema to recuse herself on or around Friday   July 10, 2015 10:00 am or as s oon as permits with in the schedule of the Chief Judge. Plaintiff demands a Special Grand Jury be convened to investigate misconduct and violation of laws by the Defendants, the Judiciary, the Government , Elected Officials, and this courts actions in the above case, and case No 1:11 - cv - 1 136 where Plaintiff was denied access to Justice, in this court for financially not being able to afford the fil ing fee. To include the actions in the Lee Far kas et al trial including t he actions of this court against Paul Allen , Raymond Bowman 1:11 c 118 - LMB, Lee Bentley Farkas, Desiree Brown 1:11 cr    84 - LMB, Catherine Kissick 1:11 cv   88 LMB, Sean Ragland, and Teresa Kelly and the Case Shapiro & Burson vs Westport Insurance Co.(1:12 cv 70 LMB/JFA) not all case numbers known. That where fitting, Indict f or  prosecution and conviction for violation of Due Process Rights of Citizens of the United States of America and any and all other criminal acts and actions that have been violated by this court et al. The Basic Liberty of Due Process has been violated. The basic liberty that our Flag stands for and here is where the standard of Liberty is set for the res t of the World. It is under the Oath that each Judge has taken that

Upload: janicewolkgrenadier

Post on 05-Nov-2015

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Motion for a Special Grand Jury to investigate the Criminal Acts of the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials Including and not limited to Judge Leonie Brinkema

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    _______

    JANICE WOLK GRENADIER

    Pro se

    Plaintiff

    v. Civil Action No. 1:14 - cv - 00827

    No. 15-1169

    BWW LAW GROUP BWW LAW GROUP

    HOWARD N. BIERMAN,

    EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC

    MARK R. GALBRAITH Lost License , WELLS FARGO

    BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a - as successor-in-interest to LaSALLE BANK,

    OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC - Defendants,

    Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities.

    MOTION TO IMMEDIATELY HAVE A SPECIAL GRAND JURY CONVENYED FOR

    INVESTIGATION INTO THE CRIMINAL ACTS AND ACTIONS BY THIS COURT, JUDGES,

    ATTORNEYS ET AL

    INVESTIGATGATION TO BE BY A NON-PARTISON GROUP OF CITIZENS WITH PLAINTIFF

    BEING ALLOWED TO TESTIFY TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE JUDICIARY,

    GOVERNMENT AND ELECTED OFFICIALS

    MOTION TO HEARD BY THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THIS COURT ON JULY 10, 2015

    Comes Now Plaintiff requests the Chief Judge to hear: this Motion and Motion for Judge Brinkema to

    recuse herself on or around Friday July 10, 2015 10:00 am or as soon as permits with in the schedule of the

    Chief Judge.

    Plaintiff demands a Special Grand Jury be convened to investigate misconduct and violation of laws by the

    Defendants, the Judiciary, the Government, Elected Officials, and this courts actions in the above case, and

    case No 1:11 - cv - 1136 where Plaintiff was denied access to Justice, in this court for financially not being able

    to afford the filing fee. To include the actions in the Lee Farkas et al trial including the actions of this court

    against Paul Allen , Raymond Bowman 1:11 c 118 - LMB, Lee Bentley Farkas, Desiree Brown 1:11 cr 84 -

    LMB, Catherine Kissick 1:11 cv 88 LMB, Sean Ragland, and Teresa Kelly and the Case Shapiro & Burson

    vs Westport Insurance Co.(1:12 cv 70 LMB/JFA) not all case numbers known. That where fitting, Indict for

    prosecution and conviction for violation of Due Process Rights of Citizens of the United States of America and

    any and all other criminal acts and actions that have been violated by this court et al.

    The Basic Liberty of Due Process has been violated. The basic liberty that our Flag stands for and here is

    where the standard of Liberty is set for the rest of the World. It is under the Oath that each Judge has taken that

  • 2

    this heavy burden lies on your shoulders to protect the Rights of each and every American Citizen. That the

    Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself.

    Wherefore Plaintiff requests this Special Grand Jury to be immediately put into action to investigate the

    appearance of the criminal actions in this Court house et al and for others. The Special Grand Jury is due to

    the peculiar nature and lack of federal and state oversight. The appearance is the Judiciary, the

    Government and Elected Officials in policing themselves has given them virtually unlimited authority,

    discretion, and few reviewable questions of law for appeal. There is little to no federal oversight through civil

    rights actions. Many federal courts have abstained from accepting even when they assert violations of federal

    civil rights laws, and state actors regularly assert immunities under the Eleventh Amendment or personal

    immunities for judicial or quasi-judicial activities. That the entire industry has set its own best practices to

    incorporate fraud and extortion as relevant standard of care. The industry regards itself as untouchable by its

    own vulnerable client base.

    The result of this unusual absence of checks and balances has become a perfect storm of unchecked power,

    absence of meaningful oversight, and financially-motivated professionals who operate the systemlawyers,

    city/ county-level bureaucrats, none of whom are open to input from litigants. Litigants encounter the system as

    a revolving door process with short term goals. There is no longer term litigant-side input to protect the legal

    and ethical integrity of the processes which deployed and policed by the system operators themselves. The

    resulting exploitation ruins the American Citizen and there families while enriching attorneys, governments,

    elected officials and judges who administer the processes they, and they alone, created.

    Date: June 24, 2015 Respectfully Submitted,

    /S/_____________________________

    Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301

    Telephone (202) 368-7178

    Email [email protected]

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on this 24th day of June, 2015, I served a true and correct copy through e-mail, hand deliver or the foregoing by

    First Class United States Mail, postage prepaid, upon the following parties:

    Robert R. Michael (VSB #74148)

    BWW Law Group, LLC

    8100 Three Chopt Rd., Suite 240

    Richmond, VA 23229

    Counsel for Defendant Equity

    Trustees, LLC, BWW Law Group et

    al

    Syed Mohsin Reza, Esq.

    Mary Catherine Zinsner Esq.

    Troutman Sanders, LLP

    1850 Towers Crescent Plaza Suite

    500

    Tysons Corner, VA 22182

    Counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

    Nathaniel Patrick Lee, Esq.

    McGuireWoods, LLP

    1750 Tysons Blvd Suite 1800

    McLean, VA 22102-4215

    June 24, 2015

    Janice Wolk Grenadier

    ProSe