july, 2007 martha thurlow and kristi liu
DESCRIPTION
Building Consensus on Effective Instructional Strategies for English Language Learners with Disabilities. July, 2007 Martha Thurlow and Kristi Liu. N C E O. National Center on Educational Outcomes. NCLB State Assessments. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Building Consensus on Effective Instructional Strategies for English
Language Learners with
Disabilities July, 2007
Martha Thurlow and Kristi Liu
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
NCLB State Assessments
State assessments must provide for the participation of all students, including students with disabilities or limited English proficiency
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
No mention of English language learners with disabilities!
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
What Do We Know About ELLs with Disabilities?
• Population 357,325 in 2002-2003 (9% of ELLs)• Numbers increasing with rapidly growing
population• More ELLs instructed in mainstream courses
taught in English -- tendency increased for students with disabilities
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Simply putting ELLs with disabilities in the mainstream
classroom with standards-based content does not guarantee they
learn the material!
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Test scores show limited achievement for these students
Percent of 8th Graders Passing One State's Graduation Test in Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
1999-2000 2000-2001
Year
Per
cen
t P
assi
ng
ELLD
SD
ELL
ALL
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
NCLBInstructional Strategies
Teachers must use “scientifically based instructional strategies” to teach
challenging academic content to all students.
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
LEP/IEP Strategies Project PROJECT PURPOSE
To provide research-based knowledge to educators on the topic of instructional strategies that help middle school ELLs with disabilities achieve in standards-based content classrooms
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Standards-Based
Content
Standards-Based
Assessment
State Policy
Instructional Strategies
Increased Outcomes
for ELLs
with disabilities
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKAdapted from Iowa Area Education Agency 267, 2004
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Study Phases
• Phase I: Review of instructional strategies described in state standards and supporting documents
• Phase II: (1) Educator consensus-building to develop lists of recommended strategies; (2) Validation of recommended strategies via Delphi review; (3) interviews & online surveys with principals
• Phase III: Dissemination
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase I: 50 State Standards Review
RESEARCH QUESTIONS1. Do states recommend instructional
strategies in reading, mathematics, or science for ELLs with disabilities?
2. What is the nature of the instructional strategies being recommended in general, and for ELLs with disabilities?
3. How are the strategies communicated to educators?
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Definition of StrategyA set of systematic activities used by a teacher that contains explicit steps to achieve a specific student outcome. This set of steps must be replicable by another individual in order to be considered a strategy.
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E OFor further clarification
In this study a strategy is not:• A student generated strategy that requires no instruction • A student learning strategy acquired through instruction • An approach (i.e., a combination of teaching/learning
strategies) • An assessment activity used to determine placement in
or progress through curriculum (e.g., curriculum based measurement)
• A principle of good teaching (e.g., planning activities before instruction, during instruction, after instruction)
• Spur of the moment; spontaneous activities suggested by a "teachable moment"(Barrera & Liu, 2005)
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Process
• Collected standards and supplementary instructional documents on Internet (e.g., frameworks, teaching resources)
• Verified accuracy and completeness with state directors
• Coded documents & analyzed results
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase I Findings69 total strategies; 48 directly
connected to a standard• 1 strategy for ELLs with disabilities
(neurological impress method)• 11 strategies for ELLs• 36 strategies for students with
disabilities• 21 strategies for general education
students
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Findings cont.• Limited research base on ELLs with
disabilities reflected in lack of references in state documents
• Existing studies and articles on topic not cited
• Most strategies cited related to reading strategies for students with disabilities
• Some strategy descriptions varied across states (e.g., KWL)
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase 2– Teacher Consensus Building
Research Question1. In schools throughout the U.S. that are
making greater than average progress with English language learners, what instructional strategies do teachers recommend for improving the academic achievement of middle and junior high school English language learners with disabilities in standards-based content instruction?
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Multi-Attribute Consensus Building (MACB)
Weighting Scale
0-20 Very Unimportant
21-40 Unimportant
41-60 Neither Important nor Unimportant
61-80 Important
81-100 Very Important
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Participants (n=67)
35.8%
23.9%
14.9%
25.4%
General educationteachers
ESL teachers
Special educationteachers
Other
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O10 Schools Making AYP
WA MT ND
OR
NV
CA
IDWY
UT
AZ
CO
NM
SD
NE
KS
TX
OK
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MI
OH
KY
MS
TN
FL
AL GA
SC
NC
VA
PA
NY
ME
WV
AK
HI
VTNH
CT
NJ
DE
MD
IN
MA
RI
NORTHEAST
SOUTH
MIDWESTWEST
4 schools
3 schools
2 schools 1 school
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase II: Importance of Content Areas
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Content Areas
Reading
Mathematics
Science
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Reading Strategies• Chunking and questioning aloud (11)• Relating reading to student experiences (11)• Using visuals (5)• Teacher modeling (3)• Checking background knowledge (2)• Choral reading (2)• Literature circles (2)• Multiple reading (2)• Predictions (2)• Pre-reading survey of text (2)• Vocabulary building (2)
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E OCurriculum-based Probe
• Proponent“I think it’s very important that you need to know where the child is at in order to keep going. You cannot keep going unless you know where the child is. So you have to constantly assess, even if it’s informal, it works.”
• Opponent“I remember doing these as a child, kind of being tested like this in such a quick time frame. And then you know, it even says ‘reach frustration level.’ And I, I just… It frustrates me and it hurts me, and it makes me sad to just think that you have to test them to the point of frustration that such a time limit. Imagine being ELL and Special Ed at the same time trying to do this.”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Math Strategies• Daily re-looping of previously learned material
(11)• A student-developed glossary (11)• Teacher think-alouds (11)• Using manipulatives (8)• Relating mathematics to real life (7)• Using visuals (4)• Drill and practice (2)• Hands-on participation (2)• Teacher modeling (2)• Simplifying problems (2)
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Science Strategies
• Modeling/teacher demonstration (11)• Using pre-reading strategies in science (11)• Using pictures to demonstrate steps (11)• Hands-on participation (6)• Graphic organizers (4)• Student-made models (4)• Vocabulary development (3)• Personal interest research (2)
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase II findings
• No common understanding of what a strategy is.
• In general teachers were neutral or positive about all strategies.
• Use of the native language was not mentioned frequently
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
• The top three strategies varied little across types of teachers.
• Curriculum-based probes or Curriculum based measurement was the most variable
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase III: Principal Interviews
Research Question
How and to what degree are state standards that specify instructional
strategies translated into practice by educational leaders at the school level?
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Procedure
• Semi-structured interviews with 10 principals– 5 in high ELL states– 5 in low ELL states – stratified random sample
• Schools that made AYP in 2003-2004 with ELLs• Four geographic areas • Same schools where teacher groups took place
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Interview Questions
Questions covered the following issues for ELLs with disabilities:
• Instructional issues• Teacher use of strategies contained in state
standards & other documents• Sources of teacher information on instructional
strategies• School or district-provided information on
strategies • School needs related to instructional strategies
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Limited
Schooling
Balanced
Services
Special
Education
I.D.
Parent
CommunicationStaffing
School violence
Rapid Growth
Of ELLs
Student body
diversity
Mobility
Limited Social
Interaction
ELLs with
Disabilities
Instructional Issues Listed by Principals
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Many principals believe state standards and supporting
documents provide no information on instructional strategies for this
population
“State documents and strategies are not connected”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
What do principals and teachers rely on for instructional strategy
information?
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Teaching models with packaged materials
“Our school has just adopted the SIOP Model for teaching ESL kids….It has all the strategies for reading and writing and they are research based. Our ESL teachers use them for lesson planning and designing many other class activities…We have the SIOP Model book…”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
“…We take an interest in differentiated instruction and that really takes on the aspect of all students and different types of learning…one of the strategies is to make a menu-type of assignment where they will have like an appetizer, and they will have a main course and a dessert and under each of those categories there are different assignments…The ESL students have been doing things like bringing in food and clothing… and that could be a part of their assignment”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Locally developed curriculum maps
“We look at the state standards and those are our…we have curriculum maps that are taught around those…The curriculum maps were then developed based upon the state standards, so the teachers…it’s been dictated, it’s not a choice, you have to follow these curriculum maps. And the curriculum maps have a pacing scale to them…The teachers are… refer to the curriculum maps, not to state standards.”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
ESL or Bilingual Specialists P1: “ We rely heavily on [name], District
Specialist, and she has provided various trainings…She is very thorough, professional, and efficient”
P2: “Our ELL teacher as well as our reading teacher, they spent a lot of time training the staff”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Locally Provided Professional Development
P1: “We had a five year grant in the district for professional development for regular teachers. During that…grant, we did the training with staff across the district”
P2: “Teachers are always getting trained, we have professional development programs, money, and incentives, ESL Summer Institute…for the teachers who could not attend it we have a back up program, we have good college connections and good relationships with curriculum people in the district”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
District Resources
“Our district provides specific strategies for ELL and special ed students and our teaching staff follow them and adapt them”
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Mixture“We do a lot of strategies. That is just a given with
our school. We go through many different areas that have been highlighted, especially in the area of sheltered instruction for our students, scaffolding, we do a lot with techniques that the state sees very important for us to work with…I’ll say that our school here pretty much across the board implements many different strategies to help ELL students out…anywhere from brain-based learning to Renaissance to reading strategies”
“
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Phase III Findings• Most principals in our study were relatively
uninvolved in directly translating instructional strategies to practice.
• Much of the strategy guidance came from packaged curricula or professional development programs, from district specialists, or from building specialists.
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
Preliminary Project Findings• State documents do not provide a great
deal of guidance
• Teachers generated a list of untargeted strategies
• Principals often delegate instructional decisions for these students
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
• Teachers may not have strong building-level leadership on teaching ELLs with disabilities
• Few information sources teachers rely on address the specific needs of ELLs with disabilities
• It’s unclear how many of sources of information are research based.
National Center on Educational Outcomes
N C
E O
www.nceo.info
Kristi Liu, (612.626.9061)
Martha Thurlow, (612.624.4826)