judicial whore c. e. honeywell on crime spree, doc. # 49
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
1/38
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC
JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUEADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF APPEAL & JUDICIAL CRIMES
____________________________________________________________________________/
NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM order, DOC. # 49, 7/14/10
NOTICE OF RECORD THREATS, EXTORTION, AND CRIMES
BY DEFENDANT JUDICIAL WHORE CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL
NOTICE OF FAKE lien, FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,
FACIALLY FORGED judgment, AND FAKE writ of execution, DOC. ## 386-5, 425
PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF
NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT ORDER, DOC. # 49 FILED 07/14/10
WIRE FRAUD, THREATS, CORRUPTION, AND SILENCING BY DEF. HONEYWELL
1. Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently threatened and intimidated the
Plaintiff public corruption victims:
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
2/38
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FT. MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,DR. JORG BUSSE,
Plaintiffs,
v. CASE NO. 2: 09-CV-791-FtM-36SPC
ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON;
JACK N. PETERSON; ROGER DESJARLAIS;
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LEE COUNTY
VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L.
RUTLAND; STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD OFTRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT
TRUST FUND; STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION; CHAD LACH; CHARLES "BARRY"
STEVENS; REAGAN KATHLEEN RUSSELL;
KAREN B. HAWES; CHARLIE GREEN; BOB JANES;
BRIAN BIGELOW; RAY JUDAH; TAMMY HALL;
FRANK MANN; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY(S);
SEAN P. FLYNN; E. KENNETH STEGEBY; DAVID
P. RHODES; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON; CYNTHIA A.
PIVACEK; JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.; STEVENCARTA; MIKE SCOTT; HUGH D. HAYES; GERALD
D. SIEBENS; STATE OF FLORIDA ATTORNEY
GENERAL; WILLIAM M. MARTIN; PETERSON
BERNARD; SKIP QUILLEN; TOM GILBERTSON,
Defendants.
/
DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN
PRESCOTT,
Plaintiffs,
v. CASE NO.: 2:10-CV-89-FtM-36-TGW
JOHN EDWIN STEELE, et. al.
___________________________________________/
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 49 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 2
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
3/38
- 2 -
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Courtsua sponte. Upon review of the chambers email, the
Court discovered that Plaintiff Jorg Busse sent eighteen (18) emails to the chambers inbox. These
emails were discovered on July 5, 2010 and July 11, 2010. In a prior case filed by the Plaintiffs,
Magistrate Judge Mark Pizzo ordered Plaintiffs to cease and desist from sending correspondence
to the chambers email account ofanyjudge or employee of this Court (2:08-CV-899, Dkt. 52, p.
3, 5)(emphasis added); See also 2:08-cv-899, Dkt. 76. Consistent with behavior in this and related
cases, Plaintiff Busse has directly violated an order of this Court. Again, the Court warns Plaintiffs
that such conduct is grounds for sanctions. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43-44, 111
S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991)(noting the courts inherent power to impose sanctions for a
litigants misconduct);Barnes v. Dalton, 158 F.3d 1212, 1214 (11th Cir. 1998)(same).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs shall immediately
cease and desist sending correspondence to the chambers email account of any judge and
employee of this Court. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of
sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and the inherent power of the Court, including but
not limited to civil contempt and monetary fines for each violation.
DONE AND ORDERED at Ft. Myers, Florida, on July 14, 2010.
COPIES TO:
COUNSEL OF RECORD AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 49 Filed 07/14/10 Page 2 of 2
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
4/38
2
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs shallimmediately cease and desist sending correspondence to the chambers email
account of any judge and employee of this Court. Failure to comply with this
Order may result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11
and the inherent power of the Court, including but not limited to civil contempt
and monetary fines for each violation.
Here, Honeywells facially unlawful order, Doc. # 49, was deliberately vague and
ambiguous:
emails were discovered on July 5, 2010 and July 11, 2010.
Here, Honeywell failed to identify, e.g., the nature and content of the alleged e mails and
who had discovered the purported e mails when, where, why, and how. Therefore,
Honeywells orders were null and void and for unlawful and criminal purposes of obstructing
justice and thejust,speedy, and inexpensiveadjudication of Plaintiffs claims for relief under
the Rules.
PURPOSE OF DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELLS ORDER WAS ILLEGAL
2. Here, Defendant conflicted [28 U.S.C. 455; 28 U.S.C. 144] and crooked Judge Honeywells
record cover up and concealment of Government crimes on the record were no reasons
whatsoever to obstruct any perfectly legal and rightful correspondence. Here, Honeywell
again illegally coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting her and other Defendant
Government Officials and from engaging in absolutely necessary and lawful correspondence.
DEF. HONEYWELLS RECORD PARTIALITY AND INCOMPETENCE
3. Here, no fit, intelligent, and honest judge in Defendant Honeywells shoes could have
possiblynot disqualifiedherself in this Case after Def. Honeywells record recusal in Case
No. 2:2010-cv-00390. Just like a bungling Government idiot and crook, here Honeywell
resorted to facially criminal and unlawful tactics.
DEF. HONEYWELLS RECORD CONCESSION OF STATE RELIEF SOUGHT
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
5/38
3
4. Here again, Judicial Officer Honeywell deliberately deceived this Court:
In a prior case [removed from STATE Court] filed by the Plaintiffs, MagistrateJudge Mark Pizzo ordered Plaintiffs to cease and desist from sendingcorrespondence to the chambers email account of any judge or employee of this
Court (2:08-CV-899, Dkt. 52, p. 3, 5)(emphasis added); See also 2:08-cv-899, Dkt.76. See Doc. # 49.
5. Said Case No. 2:08-cv-00899 had been removed from STATE to this Court by Co-
Defendant Crooked Judges John E. Steele and S. Polster Chappell, who aftertheirremoval
fraudulently claimed that Plaintiffs had purportedly not pursuedSTATE remedies, which
was a self-evident perversion of the record and truth. To add injury to insult and judicial
crimes, judicial Defendant Mark Allan Pizzo conspired to fraudulently sanction the Plaintiffs
for their pleadings in STATE Court.
6. Here, Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Defendant Judge Pizzo could not have
possiblysanctioned the Plaintiffs under FEDERAL R. Civ. P. 11 for Plaintiffs STATE
Court pleadings. Here, Defendant Honeywell further established herself as a judicial fool and
crook, who must be impeached under public policy to prevent further harm and injury to the
American people.
DEF. HONEYWELLS FRIVOLOUS AND UNSUPPORTED IDIOTIC ALLEGATIONS
7. Here frivolously, Defendant Honeywell rambled incomprehensibly about unidentified
behavior:
Consistent with behavior in this and related cases, Plaintiff Busse has directly violatedan order of this Court. See Doc. # 49, p. 2.
8. Here, Honeywell failed to explain and support whatbehavior could have possibly been a
direct violation? Since when is alleged correspondence a violation of what law or
rule? Why is alleged correspondence misconduct under what law and rule? How could
necessary correspondence violate any law or rule. Here again, Defendant Honeywell
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
6/38
4
utterly failed on the public record to support any misconduct and/or violation. Here
under color of office and non-existent authority, Defendant Honeywell unlawfully and
criminally interfered with proper procedure and used wires and multi state dissemination of
her record judicial trash, Doc. ## 48, 49, and other orders, to, e.g., perpetrate fraud on the
Court, extort, threaten, and coerce the Plaintiffs from further prosecution. Therefore,
Plaintiffs demand immediate disqualification of judicial whore C. E. Honeywell to which
the Plaintiffs have been absolutely entitled, 28 U.S.C. 144, 28 U.S.C. 455.
DEF. HONEYWELLS PERVERSION OF RULE 11
9. Here in particular, Honeywell has disrespected and perverted the law for criminal purposes of
delaying and obstructing justice under color of, e.g., fake land parcels and facially forged
resolution 569/875, and a fake judgment and writ of execution, which Honeywell knew
had neverexisted, and as a matter of law, could have neverpossibly transferred title to the
Defendants in State and Federal Courts.
EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR IMPARTIAL VENUE
10. Because the Plaintiffs have been forced to live in constant fear of Defendant Honeywells
illegal and criminal threats, punishment, sanctions, contempt threats, and fraudulent
allegations on the record, the Plaintiffs demand a different and hopefully impartial venue.
HONEYWELLS RECORD FAILURE TO STATE ANY GROUNDS
11. Like a bungling Government idiot, here Defendant Honeywell failed to present the legal
issue, the law, facts, application, and properconclusion. Therefore, Honeywells order was
deceptive, fraudulent, null and void, and for prima facie unlawful purposes of keeping the
Plaintiffs away from this Court.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
7/38
5
PLAINTIFFS OBJECT TO HONEYWELLS NAZI TACTICS ON THE RECORD
12. The Plaintiffs expressly defend against Defendant Honeywells record Nazi tactics of
intimidation, harassment, and fraud on the Court.
EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED E MAILS
13. The Plaintiff public corruption victims hereby demand full disclosure of the alleged e mails
so that the can be entered as evidence in the criminal and civil prosecution of Defendant C.
E. Honeywell.
DEF. HONEYWELL DEPRIVED PLAINTIFFS OF THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
14. The Plaintiffs have had fundamental rights to, e.g., own property, exclude Government,
redress their Government grievances and in particular be free from, e.g., the record
Government corruption, extortion, fraud, fraud on the Court by Defendant Corrupt Judge C.
E. Honeywell and other Defendants and Officials under color of facially forged land
parcels, and non-existent regulation, law, and resolution 569/875, a fraudulently
procured writ of execution, Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 and fake lien.
DEF. HONEYWELLS WANTON DISREGARD FOR THE LAW
15. As an Afro American Judge, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell exhibited wanton
disregard for Plaintiffs Constitutional and Civil Rights and deliberately disrespected the law.
Who the f does Defendant Honeywell believe she is to act just like a Nazi style judge and
display her well-proven ignorance and arrogance on the public record for the world to see?
DELIBERATE DENIAL OF EQUAL RIGHTS & EQUAL COURT ACCESS
16. Here, Plaintiffs had the equal rights of the Defendants to correspond under, e.g., the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and Local Rules of this Court. Therefore on its face, Honeywells order,
Doc. # 49, was intimidating and an unlawful threat to refrain from rightful prosecution and
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
8/38
6
blowing the whistle on Honeywells crimes of, e.g., fraudulent concealment, obstruction of
justice, and deliberate deprivations.
DEF. HONEYWELL EVADED RIGHTFUL PROSECUTION & CORRESPONDENCE
17. Here admittedly, Charlene E. Honeywell has been a named and served party Defendant, and
Honeywell had disqualified herself. See Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390. Therefore here,
Honeywell threatened and intimidated the Plaintiffs with punishment and sanctions.
DEF. HONEYWELLS FRAUD ON THE COURT & ILLEGAL SILENCING
18. Here for criminal and unlawful purposes of silencing and shutting up the Plaintiff
whistleblowers, covering up for other Defendants crimes of record, concealing, and
conspiring to conceal, e.g., fake land parcels, facially forged sham land claim O.R.
569/875, non-existent 07/29/09 judgment [see Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228], and a
fake lien [violative of Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.], Defendant Crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell made
unlawful orders, Doc. ## 48 and 49, without any authority whatsoever outside herjudicial
capacity.
DEF. HONEYWELL FABRICATED WRIT OF EXECUTION
19. Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed record absence of writ
of execution, record fake land parcels such as, e.g., 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0, and
facially forged resolution 569/875 [see Doc. ## 288, 282; Case No. 2:07-cv-00228, Lee
County PB 3 PG 25 (1912)]:
In the motion, Plaintiffs appear to seek a release of the writ of execution andattachment of a lien to property issued in Busse v. Lee County, Florida, et al., CaseNo. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-29SPC. That case was before [Defendant] Judge John Steeleand [Defendant] Magistrate Judge Sheri Chappell. See Doc. # 48.
20. Here in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Honeywell concealed and agreed to
conceal the stringent requirements of 55.10, Florida Statutes, and non-existence of any
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
9/38
7
lien. Here in particular, Def. Honeywell knew that admittedly Defendant K. M. Wilkinson
had never even fileda Rule 38 motion, Fed.R.App.P. 38, and that Appellate Case No.08-
13170-BB had been CLOSED on 06/11/2009. Here, Honeywells facially fraudulent
order, Doc. # 48, further proved Defendant Honeywells prima facie pattern and policy of
corruption, extortion, bribery, and case fixing outside any officialcapacity.
DEF. HONEYWELLS FALSE PRETENSES AND FABRICATION OF LIEN
21. Here in particular, Honeywell knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal with other Judges
and Defendants that a facially non-existent judgment could NOT havepossibly become a
lien on real property. See 55.10, Fla. Stat.
22. Here Def. Honeywell knew that fake resolution 569/875 and Def. Wilkinsons forged
land parcels had never existed, and that no valid writ of execution was ever executed
and/or witnessed by any identifiable judge. Here, no judgment existed on the Docket,
Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Document 425 Filed 02/02/10; see Doc. ## 288, 282.
DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO EXTORT
23. Here, Defendant extortionist Honeywell conspired with other Judges, Officials, and
Defendants to extort Plaintiff corruption victims and whistleblowers property and fees
under color of, e.g., a facially forged resolution 569/875, fake land parcels, a non-
existent 07/29/09 judgment and a fake writ of execution. See Doc. ## 425, 288, 282, 386,
365, 432; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY
24. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to
conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.
2:2007-cv-00228:
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
10/38
8
KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the EleventhCircuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.
Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and
Peterson conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal
the non-existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55,
Florida Statutes.
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009
25. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE
NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.
11th Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.
RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30
26. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.
District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #
386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th CIRCUIT FORM MISC-
12 (12/07).
27. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had neverclaimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the
Rules, was never entitled to more than $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a
matter of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed
that the costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
$24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]
28. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court
receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir.
1987).
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
11/38
9
HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60
29. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants
Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government
corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.
PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.
RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD
30. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials
fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and
07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).
CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES
31. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired
with other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land
parcels. See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial
whore Sheri Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION
32. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court,
Defendant Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed
Plaintiffs State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed
Plaintiffs legal action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate
33. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th
Circuit
fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
12/38
10
III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.
Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state
remedies in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899],
adequately pleadedall their prima facie ripe federal claims, and demanded relief from said
facially fraudulent and corrupt Government determinations.
EMERGENCY OF DEFENDANTS CONCEALMENT OF REMOVED STATE ACTION
34. Here, Judges concealed and conspired to conceal Busses pursuit in State Courtand
Defendant Crooked Judge Steeles and Chappells removal from State to Federal Court. See
2006-CA-003185; Def. Judge Gerald, Lynn, Jr.; 2:2008-cv-00899 [removed].
EMERGENCY OF RECORD BRIBERY AND CASE FIXING
35. Here insanely, and in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Judicial Crooks Steele and
Chappell fraudulently and criminally pretended that Plaintiffs rights to own their real
property and exclude Government from their riparian Gulf-front street and up lands,
S.T.R.A.P # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), were purportedly not
fundamental rights. See brazen bribery and public corruption on the record!
DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO FABRICATE RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS
36. Furthermore here, Defendant judicial whore Honeywell knew and concealed that in
exchange for bribes, Defendants Steele and Chappell had conspired with other Defendants to
fabricate ripeness requirements under color of fake resolution 569/875. See Doc. # 338;
Fixed Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Doc. ## 213; 236; Fixed Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.
PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS SUED UNREPRESENTED DEF. HONEYWELL
37. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners and public corruption victims sued
Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell in herprivate individual capacity, because her
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
13/38
11
purported orders were outside any immunity and scope ofofficialacts. See Docket 2:2010-
cv-00390.
38. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and
disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.
39. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin
Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.
40. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge
Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS
41. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged
parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat
of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.
FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment
42. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently
pretended:
11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as alien against the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.
43. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not
authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never
received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was
devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.
44. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to
conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
14/38
12
DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2
45. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and
maps. Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a
judgment. See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did
not match font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not
possibly have been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted
judgment copy did not comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any
address.
46. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:
On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).
47. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk
and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.
HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED
48. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any
identifiable judge:
you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Centsin the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]
Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was
null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.
DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY
49. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:
4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
15/38
13
double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.
Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff
[and not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.
50. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:
Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.
Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be
supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing
law, or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained
assertions of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record,
O.R. 569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any
regulation, legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have
possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here,
the Plaintiffs had defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and
refused to exchange their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g.,
threatened, harassed, defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their
fundamental rights to own property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no
due process and no equal protection, and have ajury trial.
51. Here, no accounting whatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have
possiblyexplained and/orjustifiedthe fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules.
Here, presentingor opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons
fraud, extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not, possibly have incurred
5,048.60 according to the Rule.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
16/38
14
WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING
IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:
HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?
52. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face
frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his
pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property
from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further
prosecution, fraudulently concealing forged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0
and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiring to extend extortion and fraud
scheme O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs
claims for relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delay and needless
increase in the cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece
of trash paper: facially null and void O.R. 569/875.
53. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never
allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.
UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS
54. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter
with State and Federal law enforcement.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand
1. An EMERGENCY Orderstriking Honeywells order, Doc. # 49, as facially unlawful and
for criminal purposes of coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further prosecution and
extorting fees and property under color of, e.g., forged land claim O.R. 569/875 and a
non-existent writ of execution and lien, violative of Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.;
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
17/38
15
2. An EMERGENCY Orderremoving Honeywell as objectively unfit and crooked under 28
U.S.C. 144, AND 28 U.S.C. 455;
3. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywells record
EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color ofauthority and prima facie scam O.R.
569/875, said fake lien, fake 07/29/09 judgment, and fake writ of execution, 55.10,
Ch. 55, 56, Fla. Stat.;
4. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record judicial EXTORTION and
CORRUPTION under color of non-existent O.R. 569/875, resolution 569/875, and
fraudulent regulatory taking pretenses, because as a matter of law, no law or
resolution, whatsoever, could have possibly alienatedPlaintiffs record property against
their will;
5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and
embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a lien and public land claim
[see, e.g., Doc. ## 213; 214; 212, Case No. 2:09-cv-00791; and Case No. 2:07-cv-00228,
Doc. ## 288, 282, 425, 386, 365].
6. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining Def. objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell, and
Defendants Jack N. Peterson, and Kenneth M. Wilkinson from perverting the record &
concealing Plaintiffs record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
7. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and
proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 48, 49; and Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214, Case
No. 2:09-cv-00791 at the dirty hands of Def. judicial whore Honeywell for said well-proven
reasons;
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
18/38
16
8. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their
State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
9. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fabricate a lien and did not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs record ownership of said
Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs Complaint and
pleadings;
10. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;
11. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record ownership by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.
Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);
12. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11 th
Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;
13. An Ordercompelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her rulings were not
NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false frivolity and
vexatiousness pretenses and the concealment of said fake legal descriptions, fake land
parcels, and fake Government ownership claims and contentions;
14. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she
disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
19/38
17
facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. 455; 28
U.S.C. 144.
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro seP.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295____________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro seState Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;[email protected]
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
20/38
18
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
21/38
19
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
22/38
20
Def. Crooked Honeywells Real Estate Fraud:
Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:
o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;
Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block
00001ever existed.
Fake Government ownership claims;
Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.
569/875; Fake resolution and law claims;
Fake land parcels;
Fake frivolity defenses;
Fake vexatiousness contentions;
Fake legal descriptions:
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
23/38
21
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
24/38
22
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
25/38
23
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
26/38
24
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
27/38
25
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
28/38
26
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
29/38
27
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
30/38
28
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
31/38
29
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
32/38
30
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
33/38
31
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
34/38
32
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
35/38
33
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
36/38
34
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
37/38
35
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell on Crime Spree, Doc. # 49
38/38