judicata deep data: mapping the legal genome. common law chimel v. california, 395 u.s. 752 (1969)...
TRANSCRIPT
JUDICATADeep Data: Mapping the Legal Genome
COMMON LAW
• Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
• New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
• Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
DEEP DATAThree metallurgic morals
GOLDSit down and make gold data.
LEADIt may take a lot of lead bullets…
APPROACH
• Start with rule-based approaches
• Reviewable, not black boxes
• …but don’t completely ignore AI, of course
SILVER…but it can pay dividends and lead to a silver
bullet.
“With respect to the pervasiveness of harassment, courts have held an employee generally cannot recover for harassment that is occasional, isolated, sporadic, or trivial; rather, the employee must show a concerted pattern of harassment of a repeated, routine, or a generalized nature.”
STRUCTURE
• As much as possible algorithmically
• Acknowledge that code can’t do it all
• 2/3 Engineers, 1/3 Legal
RESOURCES
• A Jailhouse Lawyer’s Manual
• The Oyez Project