jp4a5d73db27982

10
Jahangirnagar Planning Review ISSN 1728-4198 Vol. 6, June 2008, pp. 49-56,  Jahangirnagar University FAR as a Development Control Tool: A New Growth Management Technique for Dhaka City Adil Mohammed Khan * Md. Akter Mahmud * Abstract Growth managemnt in the form of development control measures were introduced to limit the density of an area and regulate the use of  land as per the plan. With the inrcease of population agglomeration the size of city grows, market of product expands, eonomic activities increases but this process have to make a  trade-off with the environmental quality, pollution and other negative externalities. It is always very crucial for planners to scrutinize the ‘planning permission’ applications carefully while accomodating new development. As land is a scarce natural resource, city planners  introduced a number of development control mechanisms for optimum use of land without compromising with the city’s environment, beauty, comfort and safety though these mechanisms are different in cities as the context demands. This paper investigates and assesses how far the Floor Area Ratio (FAR), a newly introduced development control measures in Dhaka, will contribute as a technique of growth management and how much it will be effective in solving the problems of Dhaka City and enhance the environmental, social and aesthetic value of a neighbourhood. The FAR technique has been enacted with a hope that it’s successful implementation will bring benefits to the city dwellers. It would be a great challenge for the development authority of Dhaka City to implement the rules of FAR as they have constraints of skilled manpower to monitor those development activities. Introduction Execution of planning rules by the concerned authorities and exertion of responsibilities of the plot owner’s in various levels of Dhaka City has frustrated the city dwellers. Mahmud (2007) has pointed out that about 94% of the buildings of this city in someway have violated the Building Construction Rules (BCR), 1996 or deviated from their approved plan. Plans of the city were violated both in local level and city level which resulted in insufficient open spaces. Private buildings in individual level are grossly responsible for illegally maximizing the floor space of their building and violation of set back rules of BCR 1996. As a result, sunlight and ventilation in the buildings are largely obstructed and that also narrowed the adjacent local roads and alleys, creating congestion. Through this process, it grabbed the necessary urban spaces which could give us comfort and breathing space. The Mohanagar Imarat Nirman Bidhimala (MINB) 2007 (GoB, 2007) replaces the constraints of the previous rules, which encouraged its evasion and abuse, and brings significant incentives and benefits to all. Provisions of mandatory open space (or, maximum land utilization of 40 to 60% of total lot area for a residential plot), setback, ground coverage, Floor Area Ratio (FAR) etc. can provide significant social and environmental benefits to the residents. It eliminates mandatory height limitations of buildings and enables design of more livable and open spaces through design flexibility and provision of lighting and ventilation of built spaces. The quality of building and its monetary value are enhanced, besides providing flexibility to the architects for space and  Lecturer, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh. E-mail: [email protected] * Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh. E-mail: [email protected]

Upload: s-m-tahmidur-rahman

Post on 13-Sep-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

sddsad

TRANSCRIPT

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview ISSN17284198Vol.6,June2008,pp.4956,JahangirnagarUniversity

    FARasaDevelopmentControlTool:ANewGrowthManagementTechniqueforDhakaCity

    AdilMohammedKhan

    Md.AkterMahmud

    AbstractGrowthmanagemntintheformofdevelopmentcontrolmeasureswereintroducedtolimitthedensityofanareaandregulatetheuseof landaspertheplan.Withtheinrceaseofpopulationagglomerationthesizeofcitygrows,marketofproductexpands,eonomicactivitiesincreasesbutthis process have to make a tradeoff with the environmental quality, pollution and othernegativeexternalities.Itisalwaysverycrucialforplannerstoscrutinizetheplanningpermissionapplicationscarefullywhileaccomodatingnewdevelopment.Aslandisascarcenaturalresource,cityplannersintroducedanumberofdevelopmentcontrolmechanismsforoptimumuseoflandwithout compromising with the citys environment, beauty, comfort and safety though thesemechanismsaredifferentincitiesasthecontextdemands.ThispaperinvestigatesandassesseshowfartheFloorAreaRatio(FAR),anewlyintroduceddevelopmentcontrolmeasuresinDhaka,willcontributeasatechniqueofgrowthmanagementandhowmuchitwillbeeffectiveinsolvingthe problems of Dhaka City andenhance the environmental, social andaesthetic value of aneighbourhood. The FAR technique has been enacted with a hope that its successfulimplementationwill bringbenefits to thecitydwellers. It wouldbeagreat challengefor thedevelopmentauthorityofDhakaCitytoimplementtherulesofFARastheyhaveconstraintsofskilledmanpowertomonitorthosedevelopmentactivities.

    Introduction

    Executionofplanningrulesbytheconcernedauthoritiesandexertionofresponsibilitiesof the plot owners in various levels of DhakaCity has frustrated the city dwellers.Mahmud(2007)haspointedoutthatabout94%ofthebuildingsofthiscityinsomewayhaveviolatedtheBuildingConstructionRules(BCR),1996ordeviatedfromtheirapprovedplan.Plansofthecitywereviolatedbothinlocallevelandcitylevelwhichresultedininsufficientopenspaces.PrivatebuildingsinindividuallevelaregrosslyresponsibleforillegallymaximizingthefloorspaceoftheirbuildingandviolationofsetbackrulesofBCR1996.Asaresult,sunlightandventilationinthebuildingsarelargelyobstructedandthatalsonarrowedtheadjacentlocalroadsandalleys,creatingcongestion.Throughthisprocess, it grabbed the necessary urban spaces which could give us comfort andbreathingspace.The MohanagarImaratNirmanBidhimala(MINB)2007 (GoB,2007)replacestheconstraintsofthepreviousrules,whichencourageditsevasionandabuse,andbringssignificant incentives and benefits to all. Provisions of mandatory open space (or,maximumlandutilizationof40to60%oftotallotareaforaresidentialplot),setback,ground coverage, Floor Area Ratio (FAR) etc. can provide significant social andenvironmental benefits to theresidents. It eliminates mandatoryheight limitationsofbuildingsandenablesdesignofmorelivableandopenspacesthroughdesignflexibilityandprovisionoflightingandventilationofbuiltspaces.Thequalityofbuildinganditsmonetaryvalueareenhanced,besidesprovidingflexibilitytothearchitectsforspaceand

    Lecturer, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Jahangirnagar University, Savar,Dhaka1342,Bangladesh.Email:[email protected]

    Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, JahangirnagarUniversity,Savar,Dhaka1342,Bangladesh.Email:[email protected]

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview,Vol.6,June2008 50

    formanipulation.ThemajorobjectivesofthispaperistoreviewtherulesinMINB2007,makeanassessmentofsocial,environmentalandaestheticvalueofFARofMINB2007applicationandalsoevaluatetheimpactofFARatcommunityandcityscale.RelevantplanningtheoriesandplanningregulationswereexaminedtoassessthepossibilitiesandpotentialsofFARofMINB2007indevelopmentcontrolaswellasgrowthmanagementofDhakaCity.ItalsofocusesprobablecontributionsofFARinacitywherelandissoscarce,communityspacesaresolimitedandinfrastructureissoinsufficient.

    GrowthManagementIt is traditionally been assumed that continuous growth is essential for economicprosperity but continuous growthwith less planning interventions (i.e. developmentcontrol)allowedsomecitiesoftheworldtogoinsuchapositionthatenvironmentalqualityhasdegradedandtheybecamealmostunhabitable.OSullivan(1996)thinks,thelargecitiescanexploitscaleofeconomiesinproduction,retailingandpublicgoods.Onthecostside, thelargercityhashigherhousingprices, longercommutingdistancess,more pollution, congestion and crime. Recognizing the land as a precious and rarenaturalresourceandconsideringthecitysbeauty,safety,comfortandenvironmentalquality,cityplannersintroduceddifferentdevelopmentcontrolmechanism.Asplanningis temporal and contextual, these mechanisms are different in different cities as itdemands. Growthmanagement is not an issue of debate for property right versuespublicinterestorviolationoftheconstitutionalrightstofreedomofmovement,ratheritisameansofenhancingthequalityoflife.Traditionalplansareoftenunabletoprovideprecisegrowthmanagementtechniquesforacity.So,theseplansareformulatedasnecessarykeepingconsistencywiththestrategiesandobjectivesofthegeneralplans.Keeble(1969)viewed

    developmentcontrolinvolvesregulationsofthedetailedaspectsofdevelopment,aboutwhichpreciseguidancecannot begivenbythe development plan, soastoensureconvenientandslightresults.

    Intherealsense,thedesireistoallowfororderlyenvironmentgrowththatwillmeettherequirementsforidealliving.PerhapsthisisthepositiveopinionheldbyKeeble,

    thatalocalplanningauthorityshould,clearlyunderstandthatthesoleobjectiveofplanningandplanningcontrolistosecuretherightuseoflandandthatplanningpowersmustnotbemadetoserveotherends.

    CommonlyUsedGrowthManagementToolsHistoryofgrowthmanagementinthisworldisnotmucholdanditwasintroducedonly40to50yearsbacktorestrictthecitysspatialgrowthandregulateitsdevelopment. Ithasbecomeincreasinglypopularinthe last fewdecadesasawayto incorporatethecommunitys growthmanagement goals into the comprehensive context of planning.Dependinguponthecontext,variousgrowthmanagementtechniqueswereimposedindifferentcitiesoftheworld.Oneverysuccessfulgrowthmanagementtechniquemaynotworkinothercityasitscontextisdifferent.Fewpopulargrowthmanagementtechniquesarebrieflydiscussedinthefollowing:RestrictiononNumber: Withinthiscategoryafixednumberofresidentialbuildings,commercial buildings or the industrial units are permitted for a given time period.Managementofcommercialbuildingsandindustrialunitscomeintwoshapes:oneisrestrictingtheamountofsquarefootageofcommercialorindustrialstructuresthatcanbe built withina given time frameand, another measure is to restrict the height of

  • 51 FARasaDevelopmentControlTool:ANewGrowthManagementTechniqueforDhakaCity

    commercialbuildingsandthusthefloorareawillbelimitedaspertheplan.Thesetypesofmeasuresrestrictthebuiltspaceavailableforemploymentandretailtransactions,justaslimitinghousingconstructionrestrictspopulation.FixingFloorAreaRatio(FAR): FARwasdevelopedasamorerefinedandadaptablemeasureofintensitythanbuildingcoverage.Previouslyplotratiowasalsopracticedforthispurpose.Itexpressesinonemeasure,insteadofseveral,themathematicalrelationbetween volume of building and unit of land. FAR, however, cannot replace moretraditionalbulkcontrolsentirely.Oftenitisnotasufficientheightcontrolnordoesitregulatetheplacementofthebuildingonthesite. Sothis techniquemainlyusedforregulatingabuildingwithinasite.Urban Growth Boundaries: Delineating boundaries to restrict growth comes in twomajortypes;oneistopermitandlimitresidential,commercialorindustrialdevelopmentwithinagivenjurisdictionboundary.Theseboundariesseektolimiturbangrowthtospecific geographic areas through regulatory restrictions and/or limitations oninfrastructure expansion. Another type is phasing development areas wheredevelopmentapprovalisdeferreduntilacertaintimeperiodoruntilexistingdevelopedareasaresubstantiallydeveloped.Inthesimplestcase,aphaseddevelopmentsystemprohibits development in areas that lack sewers or some other basic public service.Phased development controls can slow growth to allow municipalities to budgetexpenditures for expansion of municipal services to developing areas over a longerperiod. Slowergrowthcanpreventtheoverburdeningofexistingfacilitieswhile newonesarebeingconstructed.Phasingcanalsoencouragegrowthnearexistingbuiltupareas,helpingtoreducesprawl.Infrastructure Adequacy: These measures typically prohibit the construction of newdevelopmentunlessthepublicinfrastructureisinaplacetosupportit.Inthismethod,prior to or as a condition of residential development approval or of commercial/industrial development approval, it is specifically required to assess the level ofadequacyofservices1 (i.e. roadcapacityortrafficcongestion)orservicecapacity(i.e.waterorsewerservicecapacity)Zoning: Zoningis, ofcourse,themostbasicandcommonlyusedlanduseregulatorytool.Zoningtypicallydictatestheusespermittedoneachparcelofland.Forexample,commerciallandisrezonedtoresidentialuseorresidentialpropertyisdownzoned2sothatitcanaccommodatefewerunitsperacrethanitcouldbefore.Eventhecontrollingmeasurescanbeimposedtoaddressgrowthissueswithinthecontextof GeneralPlan.Stepscanbetakentorestrictthetotalnumberofnewsubdividedlotsthatcanbecreatedinagiventimeframe.

    GrowthManagementLegislationinBangladeshDevelopmentcontroltechniquesinthecitiesofBangladeshlargelyfailedduetolackofpropermonitoringoftheconstructionactivities.Mahmud(2006)thinkslackofeffectiveenforcementofplanninglawshaveresultedinahabitofplanviolation/deviationfromtheoriginalplanbytheplotownersandeventuallygivingrisetoanunplannedandhaphazard development of the city. Existing planning regulations are not exercisedproperlyduetocorruption,sociopoliticalinfluenceandlackofinstitutionalcapacityof

    1 levels of service is measured on the basis of specific standards for virtually all publicinfrastructure,includingroads(congestionlevels),schools(capacityandcrowding),parks(acresperperson),andpoliceandfireservices(responsetimes).

    2 intendedtoreducetheultimateholdingcapacityofanarea,eitherintermsofresidencesorthelandavailableofbusinessexpansion.

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview,Vol.6,June2008 52

    theauthorities.Sogrowthmanagementtechniquesnevercomeupwithitsdesiredresult.Developing countries are struggling with the insufficient and ineffective laws andregulationsfordevelopmentcontrol.Perhaps,theyarestrugglingtomeettheimmediateneedandkeepingbodyandsoultogetherratherthanfindingasolutionofensuringbetterlivingenvironment(Mahmud2007).Presently,wehavefewlegalinstrumentsthatought to be used for controlleddevelopment of the towns andcities of Bangladesh.Density control is generally one of the preferred development management tools asdensitiesdefinetheoverallsizeorbulkofconstructionwhilealsoexpressthedemandthatanareaplaceonitsinfrastructure. DMDPUrbanAreaPlansetforthguidelinesfordevelopmentmanagement(DMDP,

    1995,VolII,P6).DMDPreportsuggeststhatcurrentRAJUKpracticeofallowing6storeybuildingsinplanneddevelopedareasshouldcontinue:ifhighdensitiesareto be permitted anywhere, it should be in areas where existing infrastructureprovision is the highest. The practice is also appropriate in the context ofanticipated density increases in existing area. In spontaneous growth areas,developmentupto6storiesshouldonlybepermittedwhereitwouldnotoverburdeninadequateinfrastructurenetworks.

    MohanagarImaratNirmanBidhimala:MINB2007amendedin2008providedmoreauthoritytoRAJUK,clearcutresponsibilitytomonitorthedevelopmentofthecity,spreadout theresponsibilities tovariousactors, spell out theresponsibilities ofbuildingdesigners,structuralengineers,sitesupervisorsandthepenaltiesiftheyfail.Importantly,itintroducedFARtomanagethegrowthofthecitybyitsrulesofbuildingcoveragearea,allowablefloorspaceandrelationamongbuildingheight,roadwidthandplotsizeetc. Obviously,success ofit will fullydependonhowtheserulesareimplementedbyRAJUKinatransparentway.

    Private housing and land development rules 2004 provides a complete legalsupportforlanddevelopmentinprivatesectorhousingwhichpermits350personsperacrethoughthisstandardisquitehighcomparedwithothermegacitiesoftheworld. It provides complete procedures and guidelines for land development,protectingtheenvironment.Italsoprovidespercentagesoflandthatmustbekeptforcommunityfacilities,amountoflandtobesoldout,schoolsites,roadhierarchyand importantly planning standards, for example, allocation of land per 1000population(GoB,2004).

    WhatisFloorAreaRatio(FAR)?The FAR is thetotal buildingsquarefootage(buildingarea) dividedbythesite sizesquarefootage(sitearea).Thus,anFARof2.0wouldindicatethatthetotalfloorareaofabuildingistwotimesthegrossareaoftheplotonwhichitisconstructed.Thus,FAR=(Totalcoveredareaonallfloorsofthebuildingonaplot)/(Areaoftheplot)

  • 53 FARasaDevelopmentControlTool:ANewGrowthManagementTechniqueforDhakaCity

    Fig.1:ThisfigureshowsFARof1.0Source:http://www.carfree.com/far.html

    Thissimplymeansthat, if theareaoftheplotis100squaremeters,then100squaremetersofgrossfloorareahas been built on the plot. Theillustration above shows a 4storybuilding covering 1/4 of the site,givingaFARof1.0.Fourfloorsof25squaremeterseacharebuiltonasiteof100squaremeters.

    Anotherinstance,anareahastheplanningdecisionofhavingFARof1.5andherearesomewaystogetaFARof1.5:

    Builda2storybuildingon75%ofthesite(2x0.75=1.5)

    Builda3storybuildingon50%ofthesite(3x0.5=1.5)

    Builda4storybuildingon37.5%ofthesite(4x0.375=1.5)

    ThisshouldbenotedthataFARof1.5isquitehigh,althoughthisdensityisnotunusualinVeniceorcentralParis,andisconsiderablyexceededinmostareasofManhattan.MostofthecitiesofdevelopedcountriesthosedonthavethescarcityoflandcanaffordtotakethemeasureoflowerFARthan1.0.MostoftheEuropeancitieshaveFARlessthan1.0.FARprovidesthefreedomtoconstructtallerbuildingmaintainingthegivenFARbutitshouldbekeptinmindthathigherbuildingswouldleavemoreroomforstreetsandgardens,butbuildingshigherthan4storiesarenotdesirablebecausetheyareexpensiveto construct and unpleasant to live. By applying of FAR we can ensure moreenvironmentalandsocialbenefitsforgeneratingurbanspacesforoureverydaylife.

    Fig.2:TheoreticalexplanationofFAR.

    FARinDhakaMohanagarImaratNirmanBidhimala2007

    MinistryofPublicWorksandHousingpromulgatedDhakaMohanagarImaratNirmanBidhimala (DMINB) in12April2006 underthepowerofTheBuildingConstructionAct,1952butitwasbeingeffectivefrom1January2007.Fromitsfirstpromulgationitwasamendedquitefewtimes.ThisplanninglawintroducedanewtechniqueofFAR

    BuildingcoveragewillbehalfoftheplotwhenFARvalueofanareais0.5.Plotcanbeused1floorathalfoftheareaoftheplotor2floorsatonefourthoftheploteither.

    BuildingcoveragewillbefullwhenFARvalueofanareais1.0.Plotcanbeusedas1floorcoveringthewholelotor2floorsathalfoftheplotor4floorsatonefourthofthelot.

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview,Vol.6,June2008 54

    development control which contributes in growth management for Dhaka City. ByintroducingFARithaseliminatedrestrictionofthebuildingheight,exceptinfewareas,andpermittedtotalfloorspaceaspertheplotsizeanditsadjacentroadwidth.IthasalsoprovidedascheduleforFARIndexwhereFARindexwasdeterminedonthebasisofplotsizeandadjacentroadwidthofthatplotwhichissameforwholecity,whichisnowbeingconsideredasoneoftheweakpointofthislaw.

    Dependingonthesizeoftheplotandthewidthoftheadjacentroad,MINB2007hasproposed minimum and maximum FAR ranging from 3.25 to 6.0 for residentialbuildings,2.0to4.5forEducationalbuildings,3.25to4.0forcommercialbuildingsand3.0to10.0forofficebuildingpurposes.AlltheproposedFARinMINB2007arequitehighforacitywhichwill accommodatequiteabigpopulationsize. Consideringtheurbanizationrateandlandscarcitythesehighstandardswereadopted.

    PlanningPermissioninDMINB2007

    SuccessofFARimplicationwillmostlydependonthestagesofplanningpermissionofMINB2007,especially,thelaststagewhereoccupancycertificatewillbeissuedbasedonthe field inspection. Inspectors will prepare report comparing the approvedplan byRAJUKandthebuildingconstructedinrealground.Tounderstandthetotalprocessandthe4stagesofplanapprovalofabuildingaregiveninveryshortintheFigure3.

    LanduseClearance

    DevelopmentPermit

    BuildingPermit

    OccupancyCertificate

    Fig.3:Stagesofplanningpermissionanditssalientfeatures.

    BenefitsofFARProvisionsofmandatoryopenspace(or,maximumlandutilizationof40to60%oftotalplot area for residential building), setback, ground coverage, FAR etc. can provide

    Document to attach:legal ownership

    papers of landLand clearance

    certificateSoil test reportFAR calculation & useAll the architectural

    design and other technical reports

    List of responsible technical personnel

    NOC of other stakeholders

    Few projects need to take development permits:Residential building with more

    than 40 unitsCommercial building with more

    than 5000 sqm floor spaceAny project more than 2600

    sqm site areaProjects directly connected

    with highway or major roadRecreational use more than

    1 hectre areaAny polluting industryAny construction within 500

    meter of an historical siteAny construction within 500

    meter of a natural site

    All form of

    development or

    construction need to

    have land use

    clearance

    Beforeobtaining

    occupancycertificate,that

    buildingcannotbeused

  • 55 FARasaDevelopmentControlTool:ANewGrowthManagementTechniqueforDhakaCity

    significantsocialandenvironmentalbenefitstotheresidents(MINB,2007).Asitpermitsafixedamountoffloorspace,itindirectlylimitsthenumberofoccupantsofthebuildingwhichinturnwouldrestrictdensityofanareauptoacertainlevel.Fewotherbenefitsareasfollows: Asiteliminatesheightrestrictionofbuildings,itenablesarchitectsmorefreedomto

    design more livable and open spaces through design flexibility. The quality ofbuilding andits monetary value is enhanced. It mayproducemorecommunityspaces,ifeffortscanbetakeninthecommunitylevel.

    It enablesprovisionofessential parking, fireescapesandmechanical spacesforwhichadditionalfloorareasarepermitted.IntroductionofFARofMINB2007willincreasemandatoryopenspacesaroundthebuildingwhichwill allowsufficientlight and ventilation to the building and reduce the total amount of builtenvironmentanditsimpactstothemacroclimate.About 50% oftheopenspacemustbekeptunpavedsothatitwillallowmorerainwatertorechargethegroundwatertablewhichisverymuchnecessaryforDhakaCity.

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview,Vol.6,June2008 56

    Fig.4:MoreopenspacescanbemanagedbyfollowingFARtechnique.Source:Zaman,2005.

    It makes open grounds, balcony and terraces, etc. affordable without loss ofbuildablefloorarea,therebyimprovingtheenvironmentoftheneighborhoodandbuildings.

    Awal (2006),claimsthattheFARprovisionsofthenewrulespermitgreaterfloorarea,makingdevelopmentmoreprofitableevenforthesmallestlandowners.

    Table1:ComparativestatementbetweenBCR1996andDMINB2007.

    DescriptionLand 2.0Katha 2.5Katha 5.0Katha 7.5KathaRoad 20ft 20ft 20ft 20ftFAR 3.0 3.25 3.50 3.75

    NumberofFloor

    Rules1996 G+5 G+5 G+5 G+5Rules2007 G+5(min) G+6(min) G+6(min) G+7(min)

    GroundCoverage

    Rules1996 60% 60% 65% 70%Rules2007 65% 60% 60% 60%

    TotalFloorSpace

    Rules1996 4290sq.ft 5378sq.ft 11619sq.ft 19066sq.ftRules2007 4320sq.ft 6143sq.ft 13125sq.ft 21068sq.ft

    Source:Awal,2006.

    It encourages greater floor area entitlements, and joint venture development ofadjacent plots by owners without legal restrictions which is profitable due toincreasedFloorAreaentitlements.

    RecommendationsandConclusion

    TogetthemaximumbenefitsofFARrules,applicationofFARshouldbeinthecommunitylevelwithcommunityeffortthantheindividualplotlevelwhichisagreatchallengeinthesocioeconomiccontextofDhakaCity.Effortsmaybetakenfrom the public authority level with the participation of private developer andcommunityforthedevelopmentofareas.

    AgeneralizedFARonlydependingontheadjacent roadwidthwill not ableto

  • 57 FARasaDevelopmentControlTool:ANewGrowthManagementTechniqueforDhakaCity

    achievetheprimarygoalofFARintroductioninDhakaCity.ValueofFARmustberevisedinaccordancetotheplotsize,populationsizeofthatparticularcommunityandavailable utility services provisionsoncommunity. During fixationof FARvalue,itmustbekeptinmindthatitwillnotexceedtheperacrepopulationdensityproposedbytheDetailedAreaPlan(DAP)ofthatareaorcontradictwiththepolicyplanofthecityplan.

    PresentMINB2007hasencouragedtounifyingthesmallerplotstobiggerplotandinitiatecondominiumforconstructionpurpose.Ownersofthesmallerplotswillhavetospentmoreconstructioncostthanbefore.SotheywillbesomewayothercompelledtounifytheadjacentplotstogetherandenjoytheadvantageofFARlike;spaceutilizationandconstructioncostwhichwillrequiresharingmindsetofplotowners.

    ExecutionofDMINB2007passedoneandhalfyearanditistooearlytopredictonitsachievementbutdefinitelyitwillbringgoodresultsiftherulesareexecutedproperlyandthebuildinginspectorvisitsthesiteasaskedintherule. DMINBhasabuiltinsystemofmonitoringofdevelopmentactivitiesintheplanningapprovalprocess.Beforeissuingtheoccupancycertificate to usethebuildingauthoritywill inspect thesite tochecktheplanandreality.So, itisexpectedthatthisprocesswill reduceviolationofplanningrulesinfutureandthuseasethecongestedcityareasinthelongrun.Withoutenoughskilledmanpowerofthecitydevelopmentauthority,thislawwillnotbringtheresultsasitwasexpectedbeforepromulgatingtheMINB2007.

    ReferencesAwal,M.A.2006.JamirMalikDeveloperkeoikhotogrostoHobena,MuktoAkash,vol.3,Dhaka.

    DMDP.1995.DhakaMetropolitanDevelopmentPlan,vol.2,pp.6,RAJUK,Dhaka.

    Fulton, W. 2006. Ballot Box Planning and Growth Management. California: Local GovernmentCommission.

    GoB, 2007. Mohanagar Imarat Nirman Bidhimala 2007, Ministry of Housing and Public Works,GovernmentofBangladesh,Dhaka.

    GoB.2006.BuildingConstruction(Amendment)Act2006,GovernmentofBangladesh,Dhaka.

    GoB.2004.PrivateHousingandLandDevelopmentAct2004,GovernmentofBangladesh,Dhaka

    Keeble,L.1969. PrinciplesandPracticeofTownandCountryPlanning.London:TheEstateGazetteLimited,pp.115.

    Mahmud, M. A. 2007. Sound Planning Permission Process as Prerequisite for DevelopmentControlintheUrbanAreas:ACaseStudyonDhakaCity, JahangirnagarPlanningReview,vol.5,pp.1526.

    Mahmud, A. 2006. Insufficient Enforcement of Planning Standards by RAJUK Hindered theGrowthManagement, TheJahangirnagarReviewPartII:SocialScience,Vol.XXIX,2005,pp.5974.

    Zaman,Q.M.M.;Mallick,F.H.;Abdullah,A.Q.M.andAhmad,J.2005.InSearchforaHabitableUrbanSpaceBuiltRatio:ACaseStudyofBuildingandPlanningRegulationinDhakaCity,inJ.H.BayandB.L.Ong(ed.), TropicalSustainableArchitecture:SocialandEnvironmental Dimensions.UK:ArchitecturalPressElsevier.

    OSullivan,A.1996.UrbanEconomics.Boston:Irwin/McGrawHill.

    Ola,C.S.1977.Planning,LawandAdministrationIbadan.IbadanOxfordUniversityPress,pp.1538.

  • JahangirnagarPlanningReview,Vol.6,June2008 58

    Ratcliffe,J.1993. AnIntroductiontoTownandCountryPlanning.UniversityCollegeLondon:UCLPressLimited.

    http://www.carfree.com/far.htmlRetrievedon12May2008.

    Growth Management Legislation in Bangladesh