jose alfredo quijada, a092 041 082 (bia feb. 4, 2016)

8/20/2019 Jose Alfredo Quijada, A092 041 082 (BIA Feb. 4, 2016)

1/14

Wiesinger, Benjamin T. EsquiePope & Assocates PC320 E McDowell Road Site 220Phoenix AZ 85004-120

Name: QUIJADA OSE ALFREDO

U.S Department of Justice

xeutve O r Imgrton Revew

Board /Immigratin AppealsOfce h Cek

5107 Leesbrg Pik. S Fall Churc Vr 2,/

HSCE Offce of Ce Counsel - POPO Box 25158Poenix, AZ 85002

A 092-04-082

Dae o s noice 2/4/206

Eclosed s a opy o the Board' dcison ad order n te aboe-frcd case.

I

Ecore

Panel Members:O'Ho, gt uly RogG A J.

Sre,

Donna Carr

Chf Clrk

Ueeam Dock

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/

Cite as: Jose Alfredo Quijada, A092 041 082 (BIA Feb. 4, 2016)


2/14


3/14

A092 041 082.

FUT ODE: Pursuant to 8 C.FR. § 1 003d)6), the record is remded to eImmigrio Jdge fr he pose o aog DS the opporni to compete or pdatedentity, law enorcement, or securty ivestigations or examinations, d er proceedgs, necessy, d fr the enty o order as provided y 8 C.F. § 1 003.47h)

Bod Membe Roger A. Paey respecy dssets d wod arm e gratodge's discretionry denia o reie, gven (er aa) he respodents repeated sehoods s tesmony.

2

Cite as: Jose Alfredo Quijada, A092 041 082 (BIA Feb. 4, 2016)


4/14

'

R F XV F M VW

M L RV

X RZ

MR F

Q J

R

))))))

L R

L : 9-

: SEP 1 8 2014

: ctio 22a)6)()i) of te Iigraio ad Natioali ct,

aedd, tht t rspodt is a alie prest i t Ued tatswiout beig aditted or led, or wh aivd i h ied tas ay ie or ace oher tha a dsgatd by t oy Gera

: djusmt f tat uder secio 245() of t ctoltar y Deaur uder ecio 20B(b) of th c

oh Poe, EPo & sociates, P.C.3 t iginia ue

Sut 26Po, rzoa 8500

ra Kapp, Esq.sist f oeartm o Homelad Securiy

2035 Nr t eal vuehoe, rizoa 8500

R F M

I. PROCEDUL HISTRY

O ugust 2, 2010, ptt of omeland Securiy "HS) su a oice ppar T) agast he respod, chargig i as roable ursua o sectio237a)(2))(ii) f he Iig r ati d atioaity c (I or "te c), as amded, i ha, at y tie aer admssio, e rspodt wa cced f a aggravad oy as

deed seco 0 a)( )() of e ct a a rlag to a ose decrbed i praal)A r ) of secio 24a) t ct ratig to ai sgglig) ect i e cae of arst oe r which h al ha aaie hat a coied he r

h urose of asisig, abtig, r adg oy a's sos, cid, o art ad o oheridvdal) to iolate a provisio o ti ct; ad sectio 2a)(2))iii) of th ct, asamded, i a at ay ti aer aisso, t rsod wa covictd o a aggraatdloy a ed i scio 0(a()() of th c, a la reatig o a att or copircto coit a ose dscibd i secio 0(a)(3) of th ct [x ] upor of s


5/14

QUJADA092-0418

chrge, DS alleged that te respondent: ( is not a citizen or national of the United tates (2is a ative and citizen of Mexico; 3 ha his stats adusted to that of a tepor lal

peraent resient on arch 9, 988, under section 210 of the c; (4 was, on arch 29, 99,denied on hs applicatio to adjust to a lawl peanent resient; and 5) was, on October 30,1989, covicted e ted States Disict out, Distict of izoa, r cospirac oanspor and habor illegal aliens, in violation of 18 USC § 7, r which the respondent wassentenced to two ers of probation and two onts in a Coit Treatent enter. [Id.]

t aster caendar proceedings held on arch 2, 2011, te respondent, through counsel,aditted allegations (, (2), d (), denie allegaions 4) and (5), an denied te two chargesof reovabilit pusuant to section 27a)2))(ii) of the Act. [Ex ] Base on DSssubission of docuentatio o the nited States District out detailing the respondent's1989 coniction, the Cou sstane alegatio (5) in the NT [Id] On ugst 0, 201, D

subited a Fo 261, dditional harges of Inadissibilit/Depoabiliy "I-261, chagithe responent as reovable o the Uited States prsuant to section 237(a)2()(iii) of thect, as ene, in tat a an tie aer adission, the respondet was convicted of aaggravate felon dened in sectio 1 (a)(43(U of the ct, to wit, conspirac to coit anoese described in section 0a)(4)(N of the ct, an oese relating to alien smugglig; adunder section 27(a)()(B) o te ct, as aene, in that aer adission as a nonmirunder section 10a(5 of the ct, the responent reaine in the Uited States a tielonger than peritted, n ioltion of this c or an other law of the Unite States. [Ex ] Ata poveup heaig on the sae a, te espondent, throgh counsel, deied ese two charges[Id.]

DHS led a second -261 on October 12, 2011, charging the respondent as reovablender section 237(a()(Ci of the A, a ended, in that aer amssion as a noniigrn,the responent iled to copl wi the condiions of the nonirant status i which he asadied; ad under section 2(a)E(i) of the ct, as an alen who prior to the date of ent,at the tie of an et, or within ve ears of the date of an ent knowingl has ecouraged,induce, assisted, abette, or aide an other alie to enter or ty to ener the United States inviolation of law Ex B. t an individual heang on Ma 14, 202, the respondent, throghcounsel, enied the charges in e second 261 a aditte alegation (4 in the NT. [SeeExs , 1 The llowing a, on a 5, 202, uing an individal heaing o the e,DS subied to the Cout a third 26 ad withdrew the two previous 261 s led with teCou d he chages contained therein Te thrd I-26 charge te responent as reovable

prsant to section 212a)6))(i) of the ct, as aened, in that the respondent is an aiepresent in the United tates without being aditted or poled, or who arived in the nitedStates at an tie or place oher ta as desigate the Aoe Geeal [Ex ure,in suppot of this charge, DRS alleged that the respondent () is not a citizen or national of teUnited States; (2 is a ative and citizen of Mexico (3) had his status adusted to at of ateporr resident o Mach 9, 1988, uner section 210 of the Act; ( 4) was, o October 01989, convicted in e nited States Distict or, District of Azona, r onspirac toTrnspo a abor llega liens, in volatio of 8 C. § 1 and 8 US. §

2

g

g

p p


6/14

QJ-

14(a)()(B) a (C) wich e was seteced to yeas' probtn an two mons i amt ratme Cet; (5) was o Mrc 2, 99, enied s picao t ast t

lawl ean esience; (6) had is status as a tempory resdt temiate o Mac 299 () las ee e Ute tats at r ear a ukow locatin on about 9a 8) was ot admtd or re aer inspcto by n miati Or Id.] A thesame ean te respdet oug cunsel amited tual allgations (1) u (8)coneded he cre f rovabit ndr sectio 2(a)(6)(A)(i) te Act, n esigatMxco as e cn feov Id

On Apil 2, 2, S e wt the Co ch i ait to tcge ctaed i te thrd I6 chge te rspnnt as movable ner seton2(a)(6)()(i) of he Ac, as amedd, ta th rset i a aie wh t ay timekoingly s ecoae, de, assse, abtte, r ade y ter alen t ener the

nte Stats in vlai f law. [Ex. .] n adtn hs -6 allge, in li of allation(3) a set h i evious -61 ad i te NT, tha (3) redet tas wasadjusted to tat of a mpora resdent on arc 988 under so 4A e Act. [Idurig ta iiviu eig, the espoet, thro ose, adited th newest erin falat (3) ad dee chag f remvabilt. [I] Fbuary 4 2014, DHS wirwthe carg ofmvablty dr sctio (a)()(E)(i) f t Act. [I DHS als wihdew etw ce reovbiy ue stion 237(a)()(A)(i) of Act coae A x. .

On ebua 98, h rsoe's Lw eanet Reset (R") wi led aFo 3 an Ptto Relative Fiance( e ), o Orphan (130") wt e Utd

Ss Cizsip a Imgratn Servces (C), mig te spo s bcar.[Ex 7. T rende's I was aproved ovebr 0, 001 [i On M 28 203base up s pprve 1 he responden ed a Fo 85, ppicat to RestePerant esde or Adjust Sats wit te o ad s priit at is nw cr. i

A mber f mts reatng t the rspn's cas ve be enre into thrcord as lws: NA, iss Auust 2 201 [Ex. ; Ds rs -26 e oAugust 0 201 [x. A; HSs secd 1 ed on cobr 201 [E. B s tird-1, at it te recr o ay 15 21 [Ex. ; HSs ut -26, on pri 23 [x. 1 D; DHSs subissio of vien, amte n the rcor n Agust 10 2 [Ex2, abs A DHs Pstion tatement ardig Remvablity ed on Otober 2

x 3] mradu o Law te rsoents usel, amt in he ecd n May14, 202 [x. ; DH' Respose t espnent's Statt of Posito, e Ma 1, 1x. 5] Ds ubissi o Eice, ami into e eor , , aA-]; an te espents r 485, picain ise Pent esce r AustStats and supri ocumts, led n Mh 28 213 [Ex. 7

3


7/14

QJ

�,_u 'l

Te espndent tested n supt s applcaon ele at ndvdual eangs eldn a 5, 202, d ebua 1, 20, bee ts Cu. 1 Hs testn and te dcuentar

evdnc pvded n s ae ae suazed bel

I. STAEMN OF TH C

Te espndent s a yo-yea-ld ale w s ed and as tee clden, agedro r, and nineeen [Ex. 7 Hs e s a La Peanent Resdent, d teesndnts t unge clden ae Unted States ctens [Id] Te espdent st enteee Unted States Mec in 981 wout nsectn o adsson [x se pnt,te espondent apled legal peanent esdence tu te nes Pga, and nMac , 88, e was ganted a tepoa esdence cad un secon 245 te Act. [E

D.] Subsequenl, e esponden ade s ousde te United States and ulzed te cad te-ente cun Te espondent last enteed e ned Stes sete aund ul 4,196 [Ex Te esnden eseed sel a a pt ent at te Unted tates-excobde nd atteed t ente te Unted Sates usng s tep esdent cad Hweve, teespndent was tld tat s cad as n longe vald and was advsed t etun t exc Tellwng da, te espnden waled und e p eny ad enteed te ed Satesllegall Te espndent as snc eand n te Utd States

On Ocbe 30, 98, te espndet ws cnvced, n e Unted State Dstct Cut, oCnspac t Tanst and Habo Illegal lens n vlan 18 USC § 37. [Ex ; Ex ,ab Te esndent cnsed wt s w, s te, s sblngs, and e ndvdls to

"gude and assst ctzens d natnals Mexc, l Salvad and Clba t ente te UnteSes llegall nea Palonas, Azna and ten povde anspoaton te ales nPenx, Azona [Ex , ab Fute, e gup ageed to povde "tepa selte te alens tougut te Penx aea wc wuld see as sa ouses' we t alensculd est, eat, and cnact elatves alad n te Und Saes, tut beng deteced bygaton autrtes [. eve, te esndent d s ccnspats caged [ealens substantal sus ne, a pn wc as ad b e alens elatves . thrug Weste Unn ney tss wic e [conspats baned at vausWese Unn ces n te Penx aea. ] Addtnall, upn ecevng te es, eespndent an s accmplces "wuld gt esevatns b teleone f te alens andtanst e sa uses t Sk Hb Apt tavel to te al destnatos n

te Unted States

ace te aeented cpac ad t c t jecve, teespnden and one e te c-cnspats peed, ang es, te fllwg overacs n te Dstct Aizna:

1 The respondent esifed troug an erreer in e Sani langage.


8/14

Q9-

, /�I.

1 O Jly 26 1 88, [h sonn tr cnsors] scsesgglg 100 E Slv ls n Ue Ses n gops o 0

e d plce vlble hose hem.

10. O Ag 4, 1 88 . coos] ec [e] S Ag . . ,ng a erve pc, o lo epl e n teresoe] e rve s l n n o, lng, he vel vnby h] Secl Ag .

Id. oaly h epon evd s $3750 y rnr ough Weten. Id.

O r 3, 200 he repen s onvc volng 1 8 U.S. § 371 As st

hs on s s l otn r er o yrs o hn t pon spn hs mmy Trn eer n h hle e glsh s seo gug. x. 2A T rs tese a hlee he es o h bio s reove o ob Se also x rsn lms sc hs convo, he h no g egge n ssg les to r Ss llly

Th epn s rely eploe vo Drgo, be home osooay, n hs ey h e 85. H se ht s e le m o m a es e llrs per o [S ao x. 7.

Il. SAEMNOF TH LW

A. Credibilt

As l er n g wer lct mes e suoy cre y o he rs rel e h y reqes he o ms k rehol ermoregrg cby, esvs, cl s l' esmny. IN 20())B. I plc s o lcon r rl m on o aer M 1 1 , 005 o ee of e L ID Ac o 005, Pb.. No. 1 0 1 3, 1 1 S. 1(A A"), s cbily eern s gove by RAL At vos

regrg ebly. The NA prvs t h creblty ness s sssse llng e:

Coseig h ly h msace, ll rlv tos, emgio jge y s rlty eet n h eeanor, cr, eosves e plc es, the her lsl eplnt's o esss con he conssny bten e plns rtesss te l semts eneve e nd eher no er

5


9/14

QJ-

�.J

oa ad osieig e icusces ude ic e saemes ee made), e ieal osisey of eac su saee, e osisey of su

saemes i oe evidee of ecod (iludig e eos of e Depeof Sae o ou odiios), ad ay iacuaies o lseoods i susaees iou egard o ee a iosisecy, iauray, o lseoodgoes o e eat of e applias claim, o y ote eleva o

IA § 20()()(C)

Relev os as o a iesss demeao ilude is o e exessios, e ay ewiess sis o sads, eousess, oloaio, ad modulaio o pace of spee SeArulampla v. shco, 353 F3 679, 686 (t Ci 2003) I addiio, e lloig cosmay supo a advese edibili dig: a aplis iabiliy o ovde suiely

deailed esio, Unakhaul v. Gonzles, 16 F3d 931, 38 ( Ci 2005) oldig a teou opely osieed e alin's eage oseci" esioy); evasive esioy, Wag NS 352 F.3d 1250 1256 ( Ci 2003) ad esioy a is ilausible,Don v Goaes, 76 F3d 738, 73 ( Ci 2007)

Ude e AL ID , eve mio iosiseies a supot a advese cedibiliydig. Jibl Gnzaes 23 F3d 1129, 138 (9 Ci 2005) Fo uroses of adveseedibili deeaio, e applica mus be give oppotuiy o explai o dey aydiseacies o iosiseies, d e Cou us oside e alias eoable adplausible explaaios Ch v sco 362 F3d 611, 68 (9 Ci 200); Singh Gonzs39 F.3d 1100, 1105 (h Ci. 2006) Ku v. sh 379 F3d 876, 887 (9 Ci 200)

Te alias esimoy aloe ay be suie o susai is o e burde of oofiou oroboaio if i is deosabl edible, esuasive, d pobaive of cssucie" o supot e aplicas claim. M f -Y-- 2 I& e. 260, 263 (IA 2007).f e alias esimo is ud o be edible, e Court ill ei e emoy i oeeviee i e ecod IN § 20()(4)) Howeve, if e Cout deeies a orroboaiveevidene sould be podued, i mus be povided uless e ali does o ave eevidee ad cao easoably obai e evidee" Id. ; see s ng Hoer 69 F.3d116, 73 (9 Ci. 2011) (og a e ilue o podue eadily available evidee maysupot advese edibiliy deermiaio ude e A ID A edibiliy lguage,supesedig pevious Ni Ciui ae la) Unuakhalu, 16 .3d a 38 (oldig a a

alic ay be ud o edible ee e a easo o quesio e appliascedbili, nd e aplia ils o pouce oduliaive, maeial, easily availalecooboaig evidee ad ovides o cedible exaaio suc ilue") (equoaios oitted) Tus, aplia elief sould poide evideiay suo aeal cs i are eal o is o e clai ad easily subje o veicaio." Mat f-C 2 &N De a 263 (quoig er o ---, 21 I&N De 722, 72526 BIA 197))Te ile o podue such easoably available ooboaig evidee ca lead o a dig a te aplia as iled o mee is o e bude of oo. Id.

6


10/14

QIJ8

B. djsent of Saus undr Sectio 245() he A

Seo 45) o Ac povs a wo s pscll pes i USaes, o ee e Saes o nseco a as sas o of lapen esie : 1) o s s e nc of vs peo o ao ccaon aas e o o be Apl 30, 2001; 2) o s s elbe o ceve in sa 3) o se is isib o h Ss pne sc; 4) a i vsa sealy vll o i o a m e plao s le 5) e o s pas $1000 p e. A §§ 245)(l ) ) h ppls -130 po ws e 1, 19 Ap 30, 001 o se us ave ee pscly pese e nSas o ecbe 21 00 e of n o LFE Ac Aees of 2000 SeN § 24)l )C) T ppic s so a vob excs of sceon y eCo Se § 245)2) san a Ao Gl may ajus sus of

a) epass de)

e a voab excse o sceo s w jsen o sas couts wl oo o o ql cos Sc cos e, bu o lie o h exsnc o s i e Sas; of e eson'ssce n h Ses e hsp o v o; e spoensao soy ncln n peconev n o i e of as anoi Mer f Hashi, 4 &N Dc 7 793 (BA 2009) caosoite) oally a ca soy ak eeois lv o e s oscio Id. Gall ou e psnce o eleva avese cos, so ioaly v r ajs o ss ee Mte of Menez-Moralez, 2 e 96

300 (B 199)

C Voluna Depatu

So 240 of h c povs e ocson of ov pocees couta pi ln o volunal pa e Ss, a ls ow xpse, f li 1) s n hscal ps in e Uie s po of a leas on yeammil c sevic o oic o p 2) s s b peso o oooa chac a ls v eas 3) s o pole u § 237)2)(A)) s vae flo) o 237a)4) (o sc o lad os) 4) s sbs ceaa covcng evnc e o se as ans o pat e Ses a s o

o so U FR § 1202(c)2), clear ovnc ce o ens o es cue n ll cases so h l o a psspo o oe avl oaosc o ss y o on wc a s epang ape o pa voi us pos a volay pu bon " aon eessa os ha h ain ep NA § 240Bb)(3)

7


11/14

QD-

IV. ANLYSIS

Te espdet led s itial appliati adjustet o stats de setio 24(i) the At Marh 28, 2013 [Ex. 7] teee, his i is goveed b te REAL I At SeAL I A (statig ta te REAL I At applies t eqests elie led o ae teMa 1 , 200 date eactmet)

Te o ds tat te espodets esoy was osiset bot ieall d wit e doumetatio e pvided te applicatio elie. Oveal, te espodet asespsive to qestios, i tat e espodet diectl ad leal asweed eve qesto

posed nd espnded to iquiies wih ple deta Te Cou will, aodigl, d the

espdet edile pposes this aalsis.

A r 30, Petii Alie Relative, was led o e esponde's behal oebrary 13, 998 d appved o Jauay 14, 1998. x. 7] A F2A vsa is imediatelavailable to the espode, d te espdet as paid te equied $100 pelt e. [Id.] Acdigly, he espodet as me the tecial equieets to apply adstet as a"gadteed alie ude INA § 245(i e Landin-olina v. oer, 580 3d 913, 915 (9tCi 2009) (disussig gradterg de INA § 24(i)) hs, the oy isse ta eais iswhee the espode desees a ga f elief e Cos discetio. INA § 245(i(2

(statig tha "te Attoey Geeal m adjst he stas o he alie) (emphasis added.

Adjstet f stats unde setio 245(i) o the Act is a disetior r o eieMtter of Rjh, 25 I&N ec 127, 134 (BIA 2009) I akig disetioa deteriatios, theCor weighs te voable d advese discetioa ctos to decide wee, o balce, te

talit f the evidece dicates tat the espodet wrrts a voable execise of disetio.tr of Jan, 23 I&N e 373, 383 (AG 2002). Te Cort balaces he advese ctsevidecig the alie's udesiality as a peaet eside wit he scial d ueosideatos peseted o s eal, to deteine wethe te gig o elief appes i ebest itees o the ou tr of Marin, 1 I&N e 581, 584 (IA 978) S cts"iclde, bt e ot liited t, the existee il ties the Uited States; te legth f te

espdes esidece i the Unied States te hadsip o tavelig aoad ad theespodet's imiati iso, icludig a pecoeved itet to imiate at he tie oeteig a a igt Matt o Hshm, 24 & e 785, 79 (BA 200 (itealtatis oted) Addiioally, a criial isoro lack teeis elevat to te exeise diseio Id Geeall, wtt te pesece o elevat advese cts, diseti wllodiaiy vo gatig adjuste stat ee ater of ndezoraez, 21 I&N ec. 29,300 (BIA 1996)

8

g

g

p p


12/14

QIJD--

s o osiive discreo cors, e resoden as ly ies e Uied Sesn long eloyen sor e resonde s legal ermen reside souse n wo

Uied Ses ciizen cidren. e resone sue leer o s eloyer wiccoed e s een eoyed cosrucio cony sice 985 d s een avued nd "ousdig eloyee. 7] Te resonden lso esied e s nocommie ny u sgglig cs sce 988 oever, e reseed no oer evidece ore o reiliio esides is cion i a daor Couni Treaen Cener,wic ws courtordered as art o s senece Addiionaly, e coleed course i ngliss secon lnguge.

dverse discreory cors cde e resoes criinal isoy d is lck o ersonl resosiiliy r is ciia cios Te resoden w covced, y ury, oCosircy o rnor d ror eg lies olo o 18 SC § 371. [x ,

a ] Bsed uon e resondens gr violions o er wn eerg e ieSes illegly s wel s cng s rossion sugglee resonde s deonsaed round ck o resec r e aws o e nie Saes. S v. Rios-Pneda, 471 U.S 444, 451(1985 (oldig "le ll lens llegly resen i e ed Ses ave, in soe wy,violed e iiio ws, cous ve screio o consier er diviual condc ddisiguis og e on e is o e grcy d nure o er violions; e loArza v. IN 159 F.3 9, 437 (9 Cr. 1998 (nding is roer o consider andisregrd o iigro ls r poses o discreon) ere e resondes violios omigraio lws re ticuly gn Firs e eered e ied Ses illeglly Te, e icied i scee o sugge 0 l Slvdora aionals ino e Uned Ses groso wey ie [ e resone roed cly o is liensuggling scee.

[.] us, e resondens violios o imgraion lw e culry grievous oenses dweig evily gis e resoden

is equly concenng o e Cou e resonden s led o cknowledge iscries eress y sor o reorse r is cios, or esais e s een reiliaed n aegl wy, dese e assage o a susil eriod o ie. urig s esioy eres Cour on eruy 1, 201, e resonde reeedly led o ae ersoalresosibiiy r hs crinl acivy Firs, e resonden dened ever eing arresed ocovced o crie Whe dreced o is convicion docens, e resonden lied e we o l ws convice o cosrac o rnso d ror egliens Seco, e resonde eed ever receivg oney r s rticiion in e lie

suggig scee. Hoever, e covicio ocues eosre a e resodereceived leas $3750 i money rasrs oug Wese non E Furterore,te resonen deied ig n e raso of a go o egl aes wn e edSes. owever, is w e ver ss r s covco. [Id.] he esonde lso seccldenied consiring o suge 10 l Saldor iols ino e ied Ses. gi, s sone e ove cs n ernce o e consircy r ic a jry uousl conviced eresonden [Id er e resonden's conul del o is ivolveen i e cosircy, is Court ske e resoden, o you dey o ere nvolved i is scee in y

9


13/14

QIJ09-08

wy? he espdet eplied, " deied it sice ws i cou ith the juy. 've e deyig itsice he espdet ls testied tht h ppeled is cvictio, ut he ws usuccess.

h espodet s gt vils f te del l, utte lck emose pesolespsiility his cimes, d ilue t eslish y sog edemig cts demostte tht vle execise f discetio is ot i th est iteest of te Uited Sttes. he Couds tht th spdet hs iled t estlish tt e ts vl execis ofdiscetio heee, s te egtive ctos peset i ths cse outweigh the positive, the Coudeies te espdets pplicti dustmet f sttus ude sectio 25(i) f the Act, s amtte f discetio See Matter of CVT-, 22 & Dec t 12

V

he Co ds tht the espodet is eligile the elief o volty deue undesecti 4 f the Ac e ws physiclly pset i he Uited Sttes ove e yepecedig sevic f his otice t ppe o August 12, 21 ; he is d hs ee peso ofgd ml ccte t est ve yes he is t depotle ude sectis 237((2(A(iiio 237((4) f te Act; nd he hs stlished y cle d cvicig evidece tht e hs tmens t dep the Uited Sttes d iteds t d s uhe, the Cout ds tht heespdet meits suc elie s tte disceti To ccept voluty dpue, espdet must le $15 d ith DS's CE Field Oce Diect ii ve (5)siess dys om e dte is de d must dep te Uited Sttes with sixty (dys om e dte f this de

NOTCE: Te espdet' s ilue to pst the equied voluty deptu od ithi the timeequied does t temite the espdet s lgti to dept iti the peid llowed, odes it eempt the spodet om th cosequeces o ilig to dep volutly durg epeiod lloed CF § 1226(c( f te espodet ils to dep the Uited Sttes iccodnce ith these cditios, the espodet will e suect to civil pelty $5 dshll e ieligile, peid o te (1) yes, to eceive y he elief ud sectis2A, 24B, 25, 2, d 2 te Act. See A § 2B(d; C. § 1226). espdet y chse to declie the Cou's t o voluty deue if te espdet isuwillig t ccept te mut f th d te oth cditis CR § 242(c(3).

WAG Should th espdet chse t le ppel f this Cuts de with the od

of mmig Appels, the espdet must, withi thiy (3) dys lig ppel with ted, smit suciet pf of hvig posted th euied oluty depu d CR.§ 1242(c((i f the espodet des ot pvide timely po to the d tht the equedvoluty depe bd hs ee psted wt DHS, th d ill ot eistte the ped ofvlunt depue i its l de Id.

WAG f e espodt les with this Cut post-decisi motio to eope ecoside duig the peiod llowd voluty deptue, the gt o vluty depue

1


14/14

QIJD9-

\-·

wil be automacally teminated and the altenate ode o removal wil ake eec mmediaely8 CF.R. § 124026()(3(i) The penaltes flure to depa vounarly unde section

240B(d of the Act will not appy the repondent has led a pot-decsion moon to reopen oreconide duing he peiod allowed voluntary depaue Id

V CONLUSION

he Cou nds hat the repondent s not elgle r adjusmen o au unde NA 245(i, as a maer o disceon. The Cour addonay nds ha he esponden is egible rvolntay departre under secon 240B of the Act and concludes tha he mer vounaydepaure a a maer o disceon

Accordingly the owng ordes hal be enered:ORDERS: IT IS ORDERED THAT the eponden' s applicaon Ausment of

Status pusuant to ection 245() o the Act s DENED.

D

IT IS FINALY ORDERED THAT the responden e ganted theprvege o vountaily depar the Unied Staes whin ixy 60 daysom he date of hs orde The repondent s equed o le a $ 500 ondwih the epartment o Homeland Securiy wihin fve (5) usine daysom he dae of hs order Should the epondent i to eave as andwhen odeed his orde shall automacly become an ordr of emova

r

om the Unted Sates to Mexco upon he chage contained in he NTAuthermore he epondent wl e sbjec o a cvil penaly o $5000and ha be ine igibe r a period o en 0 yeas to eceve any rthereieunder section 240A, 240B 245, 248 nd 24 of he Act

SEP 1 8 204

U.S Immigraton Judge

CERTIICATE O SERVICE

SERVICE BY ail �) Pesona Sevice (P)TO OS [ ] A ien Aens AtoeyDATE By: o� (Co Sa

1 1

g

g

p p

jose alfredo quijada, a092 041 082 (bia feb. 4, 2016)

Documents