jorma karppinen, eurofound branislav mikulic, eurofound...05/10/2010 1 quality of life in eu -...
TRANSCRIPT
05/10/2010 1
QUALITY OF LIFE in EU QUALITY OF LIFE in EU --
Trends in key dimensions 2003Trends in key dimensions 2003--20092009
Jorma Karppinen, EurofoundJorma Karppinen, EurofoundBranislav Mikulic, EurofoundBranislav Mikulic, Eurofound
The 96th DGINS Conference, Sofia, 30 September 2010
05/10/2010 2
European Foundation European Foundation Established in 1975
First European Union Agency (with Cedefop)
Annual budget: EUR 20 m
Ca. 100 staff in Dublin
Brussels Liaison Office
Network of European Observatories (NEO) in 28 countries
05/10/2010 3
Structure of the presentation:Structure of the presentation:
Quality of life: main features of the EF concept
European quality of life survey (EQLS): unique tool to measure the concept
Results: trends in key dimensions of quality of life and wellbeing in EU 2003-2009
05/10/2010 4
Core domains of quality of lifeCore domains of quality of life
• Income, financial situation of the household and deprivation• Employment and job quality
• Work-life balance• Family relations and support• Social inclusion/exclusion (community life and social
participation)
• Knowledge, skills and employability• Quality of housing , neighbourhood and local environment • Health and access to health care
• Social capital (trust) and quality of society (perceived tensions)• Perceived quality of public services• Subjective well being (happiness, life satisfaction , optimism
about future, specific domain satisfaction)
05/10/2010 5
EF concept of quality of life: main featuresEF concept of quality of life: main features
Income and living standard, the concepts which prevailed in earlier EF works proved to be too narrow to capture whole complexity of challenges which asked for quick and adequate policy responses.
Quality of life is a multi-dimensional conceptQuality of life refers to individuals’ life situation (micro perspective)Quality of life is measured by objective as well as subjective indicators
EQLS as a tool to measure the EF concept
05/10/2010 6
EQLS: Key featuresEQLS: Key featuresFirst round 2003
Second round 2007
• Representative household survey among Europeans aged 18 and over• Frequency of the survey: every 4 years• Stratified and multistage sampling (regions-settlements- PSU – addresses - individuals)• Sample size: 1000-2000 persons per country • Full country coverage: all EU Member States + all CC (+ Norway)• Input harmonized survey (common questionnaire for 36’ F2F interview)
• 100+ analytical variables and indicators collected on all key dimensions of quality of life• Centrally coordinated fieldwork: TNS opinion• Data collection: September to November 2007 • Overall survey response rate: 58% • Item non-response negligible
Partial survey 2009 : a number of EQLS questions implemented in 2009 under EB
Third round 2011
05/10/2010 705/10/2010 7
Trends in quality of life Trends in quality of life 2003 2003 –– 2007 2007 –– 2009 2009
05/10/2010 805/10/2010 8
Economic background:
Growth between 2003 and 2007, recession in 2009
• Stable economic growth in EU between 2003 and 2007, rapid growth in NMS
• In the new member states reforms and huge investments (FDI and EU funds) led to two-digit annual growth rates
=>Narrowing gap between GDP of NMS and EU15
Real GDP growth in the EU27, 2003-2009
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
• Between 2007 and 2008 economic growth slowed, in 2009 all EU countries entered into recession
05/10/2010 905/10/2010 9
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15EU
27Po
land
Cypr
usM
alta
Gre
ece
Fran
cePo
rtuga
lBe
lgiu
mSp
ain
Luxe
mbo
urg
Aust
riaNe
ther
land
sSl
ovak
iaCz
ech
Repu
blic
Swed
enBu
lgar
iaG
erm
any
Italy
Unite
d Ki
ngdo
mDe
nmar
kHu
ngar
yRo
man
iaIre
land
Slov
enia
Finl
and
Esto
nia
Lith
uani
aLa
tvia
200320072009
Real GDP growth by country
05/10/2010 1005/10/2010 10
Subjective wellbeingSubjective wellbeing
Life satisfaction as an aggregate measure of well-being
05/10/2010 1105/10/2010 11
Overall life satisfaction and domains of satisfaction
7.0
8.0
7.3
7.4
6.9
7.0
7.9
7.1
7.3
6.9
6.8
7.7
7.2
7.1
6.6
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
General life satisfaction
Satisfaction with family life
Satisfaction with job
Satisfaction with health
Satisfaction with currentstandard of living
20032007
2009
05/10/2010 1205/10/2010 12
Life satisfaction by population groups
Life satisfaction 2003 2007 Change 2007 2009 ChangeEU15 7.30 7.19 -2% 7.19 6.97 -3%NMS12 6.00 6.47 8% 6.47 6.05 -6% 18-34 7.16 7.13 0% 7.13 7.07 -1%35-64 6.91 6.97 1% 6.97 6.64 -5%65+ 7.09 7.07 0% 7.07 6.76 -4% Employed 7.17 7.18 0% 7.18 6.96 -3%Unemployed 5.58 5.76 3% 5.76 5.56 -4%Retired 7.03 7.03 0% 7.03 6.61 -6% Easy 7.92 7.84 -1% 7.84 7.74 -1%Difficult 5.35 5.31 -1% 5.31 4.86 -8%
05/10/2010 13
Satisfaction with life in generalSatisfaction with life in general
Average life satisfaction
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
BG LT LV SK EE HU PT PL RO CZ EL FR SIEU27CY IT DE MT UK ES BE NL IE LU AT SE FI DK
2007
2009
2003
05/10/2010 14
Change in the level of life satisfaction (in %), 2007-2009
-3%
-16%
-14%
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
LV BG RO MT PT HU FR EE LT SE ES LU EL SK PL SI FIDK
EU27 CY IE IT DE UK NL BE CZ AT
05/10/2010 1505/10/2010 15
Social capitalSocial capital
Trust in people and democratic institutions
05/10/2010 1605/10/2010 16
Trust in people and institutions
5.6
0.0
0.0
5.2
4.6
4.6
4.9
4.1
4.1
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
People
Parliament
Government
200320072009
05/10/2010 17
Trust in Parliament (scale 1-10)
3 3.13.3
3.6
4
3.6
4.8
4.5
4.2
4.8
4.54.3
5.1
4.6
2.8
3.9
5.6
5.1
4.74.9
5.15.3
6.1
5.8
6.4
5.8
6.3
7
2.2
2.6 2.72.9
3.2 3.3 3.4
3.7 3.73.9 3.9 3.9
4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3
4.6 4.7 4.85
5.5 5.5
5.8 5.96.1
6.4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LV LT PL HU RO CZ EL UK SI
EE SK PT IEEU27 BG IT ES FR DE CY BE MT AT NL FI
LU SE DK
2007
2009
05/10/2010 1805/10/2010 18
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Change in trust in national parliament, 2007-2009
05/10/2010 19
Summary of findingsSummary of findings
•QoL and subjective wellbeing had been improving in the period of relatively stable (and relatively high) economic growth in 2003-2007, in particular in NMS.
•The enlargement which enabled direct foreign investment and get access to EU funds (and market) seem to have contributed to a rapid economic growth in NMS.
•Many people in these countries benefited from the economic prosperity which is also to be seen in increased quality of life and subjective well-being.
•With the current recession and economic crisis, the quality of life of EU citizens diminished as well as their subjective well-being, especially in NMS.
•The declines in wellbeing and quality of life are found in countries more or less marked by the recession. The countries experiencing the deepest recession are not always those reporting the greatest change in quality of life – but it appears to be the case with Latvia and Estonia as well as Bulgaria and Romania.
•The well-being of traditionally vulnerable groups have diminished more rapidly than that of the rest of the population. E.G. elderly, the retired people and those who are under serious economic strain have recorded more negative changes in aspects of quality of life
•Still the impact of the economic crisis on perceived should not be exaggerated: at least until September 2009 there had been almost no change in the overall level of economic strain in EU and relatively small deterioration in the indicators of deprivation.
05/10/2010 20
EQLS compared with other panEQLS compared with other pan--European surveysEuropean surveys1. In existing pan-European social surveys (EU-SILC, LFS, HBS, ESS) the their
primary focus is not on entire quality of life but on a few very specific dimensions of quality of life (income, employment, consumption, political participation). Thematically they overlap only marginally with EQLS surveys since they are designed for other purposes and uses. Thus, they are not competitors on the quality of life information market.
2. The EQLS is specialized survey designed to measure various dimensions of people’s life and relationships between them. Currently, EQLS is the onlycross-national survey which covers almost all key aspects (dimensions) of quality of life. EQLS fills information a gap in the area of QoL3. Other pan -European surveys and EQLS are nicely complementing each others: While other surveys use more of the objective indicators, EQLS is collecting more of the subjective ones. Focus on perceptions, views and expectations of the citizens and ensures value added
4. EQLS is flexible: new questions, new concepts research
05/10/2010 21
How to make EQLS How to make EQLS eveneven betterbetter
Sampling in EQLS to be based on population registers:EQLS contractor do not have direct access to pop. registers in all countriesHaving sample drawn from registers would mean having more reliable sample frame than using random walk method
Larger sample size (than 1000-2000) would contribute to better reliability of statistical estimates
EF is searching for possibilities to implement EQLS with larger sample through partnershipEF invites national governments and social partners to participate in the survey by topping-up the sample for their countryVery low marginal costs for preparation of the fieldwork and relatively low costs of fieldwork per interview
Stakeholders input (national governments and social partners) in redesign of the EQLS questionnaire to be implemented in 2011 by taking part in the Questionnaire Development Group meetings
05/10/2010 22
Thank you!Thank you!
Blagodaria Blagodaria
Tak Tak
Dank u Dank u
Bedankt Bedankt
AitAitääh h Kiitos Kiitos
Danke schDanke schöön n ΕυχαριστώΕυχαριστώ
KKööszszöönnööm m Go raibh maith agat Go raibh maith agat
Grazie Grazie Paldies Paldies
Dekoju Dekoju
Obrigado Obrigado
Hvala Hvala
Gracias Gracias
Tack Tack
TesekkTesekküür ederim r ederim
MerciMerciDziakuju Dziakuju
Dêkuji Dêkuji
Paldies Paldies
Grazzi Grazzi
DziDzięękujkujęęMultumesc Multumesc
Dakujem Dakujem
More info : www.eurofound.europa.euMore info : www.eurofound.europa.eu