johnthescone

10
johnthescone Renewable Energy: Mitigation Potential and Costs r Krey, Lead Author Chapter 10 national Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Upload: lelia

Post on 12-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

johnthescone. Renewable Energy: Mitigation Potential and Costs. Volker Krey, Lead Author Chapter 10 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). 2. Global RE primary energy supply from 164 long-term scenarios versus fossil and industrial CO 2 emissions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: johnthescone

johnthescone

Renewable Energy: Mitigation Potential and Costs

Volker Krey, Lead Author Chapter 10 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Page 2: johnthescone

Global RE primary energy supply from 164 long-term scenarios versus fossil and industrial CO2 emissions.

2

Source: SRREN SPM, Figure SPM.9

Page 3: johnthescone

Global RE primary energy supply from 164 long-term scenarios versus fossil and industrial CO2 emissions.

3

2007

Source: SRREN SPM, Figure SPM.9

Page 4: johnthescone

RE deployment depends on a number of factors:• How will the demand for energy services, i.e. the

scale of the energy system develop?• What about fossil fuel prices? – fossil energy

resources and extraction technology• Will the costs of RE come down further without

climate policies?• To which other objectives such as secure energy

supply, energy access, air pollution control, etc. can RE contribute?

Why do we see such a wide RE Deployment Range inBusiness-As-Usual Scenarios without additional Climate Policies?

Page 5: johnthescone

Global RE primary energy supply from 164 long-term scenarios versus fossil and industrial CO2 emissions.

5

2007

Source: SRREN SPM, Figure SPM.9

Page 6: johnthescone

RE deployment in Climate Stabilization Scenarios in addition depends on:

• How much mitigation will come from the non-energy sectors?

• How much can energy efficiency do?• What will be the role of the non-RE low-carbon

supply options?– Nuclear Energy– Carbon Capture and Storage

• Can adverse impacts of RE deployment be avoided?

And what is driving the RE Deployment in Scenarios with Climate Policies?

Page 7: johnthescone

RE will have to play a larger role in mitigating GHG emissions if other options are not available.

Figure 10.6 Increase in global renewable primary energy share (direct equivalent) in 2050 in selected constrained technology scenarios compared to the respective baseline scenarios.

Page 8: johnthescone

Figure 10.11 Global mitigation costs (2010-2100) from the ADAM project under varying assumptions regarding technology availability for long-term Stabilization targets of 550 and 400 ppm CO2eq.

So how much does it cost?

Without additional RE deployment the Without additional RE deployment the 2ºC target may not be achievable.2ºC target may not be achievable.

Large uncertainties Large uncertainties in “option value” of REin “option value” of RE

Page 9: johnthescone

• Improvements in identifying the most salient factors that determine future RE deployment

• Several multi-model studies are currently on their way.

But…

• Future cost and performance improvements of RE and other mitigation options will remain unknown.

What can we expect for AR5?

Page 10: johnthescone

Thank you