john osborne : gs-sem civil engineering 18 may 2009 ces 9 june 2010 1.news from ilc japan cfs review...

33
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1. News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 : http://ilcagenda.linearcollider.org/conferenceDisplay.py?co nfId=4613 2. News from CTC 18 May 2010 on CLIC tunnel cross section 3. CDR Authors for CES studies

Upload: dwain-wells

Post on 19-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

CES 9 June 2010

1. News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

• http://ilcagenda.linearcollider.org/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=4613

2. News from CTC 18 May 2010 on CLIC tunnel cross section

3. CDR Authors for CES studies

Page 2: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG

CTC 18 May 2010

CES studies for CDR :

1. Tunnel cross section

2. Injection Complex

3. BDS Layout

4. Experimental Area Layout

5. Summary

Page 3: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

1.Tunnel cross section

Page 4: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009 4

4.5m tunnel for CDR as agreed in 2009

Page 5: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009 5

Drawbacks with 4.5m tunnel identified in 2009

• Positioning of electronic racks not ideal• Solution : Re-position onto tunnel floor, but possibly means deleting safety barrier

• Difficult to access ‘tunnel wall’ side of modules• Solution : remove entire module for access ?

• Access to Drive Beam dumps • Solution : Local Tunnel enlargement to allow ‘ladder’ access (see next slides)

• Impact from vibration from floor embedded pipes• Solution : Further studies in TD Phase

• Reduced space due to transversal ventilation and perhaps not sufficient cooling power • Solution : Study longitudinal ventilation system during TD Phase

• No space for vehicle powering ‘monorail’ and integration conflict• Inductive powering for vehicle ?

Page 6: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Revised 4.5m cross section

Page 7: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Access to Drive beam dump

Page 8: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Page 9: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Access to LHC Dumps at Point 6

Page 10: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Cross section for ILC Europe (CERN) 5.2m diameter for Kly-Cluster

Page 11: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Possible 5.2m cross section for CLIC

Page 12: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

‘Metro standard’ 5.6m tunnel +150MCHF : Proposed at CTC May 2009

Page 13: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

2. Injection Complex :Input mainly from :

L.Rinolfi

B.Jeanneret

F.Stulle

Page 14: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009 14

Injection Complex 2009 Layout

Page 15: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009 15

Injection Complex 2010 Layout

• 1.1km extra tunnel for turnarounds

• 500m extra for CR, DR

• Injection cut and cover tunnels lengths increased to 1.4km (from 1km)

‘turnaround’ is now a horizontal cut/cover design

Page 16: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

‘Spiral descents’ removed

Page 17: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009 17

Surface tunnels / halls for Injection Complex

2010 Layout : Surface buildings added

Page 18: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

CLIC Damping Rings schematic layout

e+ Damping Ring

e- Damping Ring

e- Pre-damping Ringe+ Pre-damping Ring

e+ linac to PDR transfer line

e- linac to PDR transfer line

e+ PDR to DR transfer line

e+ DR to Booster linac transfer line

e- PDR to DR transfer line

e- DR to Booster linac transfer line

205 m

205 m

80 m

80 m

Dump

157 m

64 m

Damping rings still to be finalised

Page 19: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

ON - HOLD

Page 20: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

3. BDS Layout

Input mainly from :

Rogelio Tomas Garcia

Edda Gschwendtner

Page 21: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Main Beam Dumps

Page 22: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Tune-Up Dumps added

Page 23: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

4. Experimental Area Layout

Page 24: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

CLIC Detector hall layout developed by :

A.Gaddi

H.Gerwig

A.Herve

CES will now use this as starting point for CE & services design, including cost estimates

Page 25: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Machine By-Pass added

Survey gallery added

Emergency escape tunnel

Better to delete cavern ‘technical alcoves’

Gantry crane capacities to be determined

CV being consulted about requirements

Page 26: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

ILC 3d models developed at CERN using CATIA :

CLIC models to follow once draughtsman is identified

Page 27: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

ILC Project general view of IR

Page 28: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

ILC Project 3d general view

Concerns half of the project (circled area)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

810

9

11

12

Diameter (m) Length (m)

Experimental Cavern Interface Tunnel 1 5.20 70

Main Dump Branch Tunnel 2 6.00 80

Damping Ring Branch Tunnel 3 12.00 145*

PTRAN & BDS Diag. Dump Tunnel 4 7.00 1105

BDS Diag. Dump Branch Tunnel 5 6.00 193

400 MeV accelerator Tunnel 6 5.20 473

Positron Production Tunnel & Remote Handling Cavern 7 8.00 162

e- BDS Dogleg Tunnel 8 5.20 375

Undulator & Fast Abort Dump Tunnel & Undulator Access

Cavern 9 8.00 360

End ML – Start Positron Tunnel 10 5.20 300

Damping Ring Transfer Tunnel 11 6.00 145

Damping Ring Junction Cavern 12 14.00 37

• Cavern number 3 can be reduced in lengthdue to deletion of photon pipe

Page 29: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

Very hectic area !

3 ∅ 12.00 x 145m

e- RTML

Positron Transfer Dump

Can be shortened dueto deletion of Photon pipe

Positron Main Dump

Electron BDS

PLTR

Spin Rotation

e+ Energy Compression

ILC Junction cavern

Page 30: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009Overall layout updated (full symmetry)

Page 31: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

5. Summary

• Will continue to try and ‘freeze’ CE layouts at monthly CES meeting. Next major issue is amount of space required for Power Converters.

• Martin Gastal is gathering input from other technical services for experimental hall (CV,EL etc)

• Costing for CDR required for all technical infrastructure by September with assistance from Amberg consultants (same CE consultants for ILC)

• Draft layout for CDR Chapter ‘Civil Engineering and Services’ has been submitted to Hermann

• Next CTC 22 June specifically about tunnel cross section (4.5m,5.2m or 5.6m)

Page 32: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

5.6m first DRAFT

Page 33: John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June 2010 1.News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :

John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering18 May 2009

CES authors for CDR : refer to mail from H.Schmickler 31 May 2010