john mathes & associates inc - summary report … · summary report field investigation paxton...

(•". I"

261555

SUMMARY REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATIONPAXTON AVENUE LAGOONS

CHICAGO, ILLINOISDecember 9, 1985

DEC 111985

IEPA-DLPC

JOHN MATHES & ASSOCIATES, INC.210 Woat Sand Bank Road

P.O. Box 330Columbia, IL 62236

riathe

John Mathes & Associates, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page #

INTRODUCTION 1

PHASE I

Personnel Affiliation and Responsibilities 3Pre-lnvestigation Data Collection Site Visits 4Initial Site Reconnaissance • 4Air Quality 4Site Safety 5Site Zone Delineation 6Documentation 6Contaminant Containment 7Topographic and Elevation Control 7Site Conditions and Quantities Surveys 8Sampling 9Main Lagoon 9Skimmer Lagoon 10Soil/Crushed Drum Berm 11Contaminated Soil Area 11Raised Area 12Factors Influencing Work Product 12

PHASE II

Personnel Affiliation and Responsibilities 13Phase II - Introduction 13Initial Site Reconnaissance 13Air Quality 14Site Safety 15Non-Agency (Supplier) On-Site Visitors and Supplies 16Site Zone Delineation 17Documentation • 17Contaminant Containment 17Topographic and Elevation Control 18Site Condition and Quantities Surveys 18Sampling 19Main Lagoon • 19Skimmer Lagoon 21South Pond 21Soil/Crushed Drum Berm 22Contaminated Soil Area 22Filled In Area 23Seepage Area 23Raised Area 24QA and QC Samples 24Factors Influencing Work Product 25

name


TABLE OF CONTENTS CON'T

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure 1: Site Location

Figure 2: Immediate Area of Site

Figure 3: Project Area and Access Restriction Zones

Figure 4: Final Sample Locations

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Pre-Investigation Data

Appendix B: Exploration/Sampling Logs-Test Pit Logs-Lagoon Liquid/Sludge Logs

Appendix C: Analytical Data

Appendix D: Paxton Avenue lagoons - Site Log (Book)

Appendix E: Photo Log Index Key

Appendix F: IEPA Background Analytical Data-Raised Area Soils Analysis

Appendix G: Dioxon Analytical Data-Lagoons/South Pond Sludge/SedimentComposite Sample


INTRODUCTION

John Mathes & Associates, Inc. (JMA), conducted a fieldinvestigation of the Paxton Avenue Lagoons area locatedapproximately at 122nd Street and Paxton Avenue, Chicago,Illinois (Figures 1 & 2). Field work was performed at therequest of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) inorder to characterize surface and subsurface contamination in thenear vicinity of the subject waste disposal lagoons. Theinvestigation was conducted in two phases, the latter programbeing initiated due to changed conditions for Phase I field work.Phase I was performed June 24 through July 3, 1985; Phase II fromAugust 8 through 19, 1985.

Site characterization work was a multiple task investigationprogram which encompassed various technical disciplines. Ambientair quality was measured and monitored. Liquids were sampled andvolumes estimated for the Main and Skimmer Lagoons. See Figure 3for site sampling areas. Sludge and/or bottom sediments weresampled in the lagoons and South Pond. Surface and subsurfacesoils and contaminant materials were sampled as encounteredduring field operations. The quantity and distribution ofchemical products and/or containers were surveyed and roughlyestimated. Easily accessible chemical specimens were sampledwhen discovered. General site conditions were observed andrecorded in a field log book for site activities. Appendix D isa xerox copy of the original field log book. Photographicdocumentation of sample collection locations and specific siteconditions of potential environmental contamination wasperformed. Appendix E is the photo log index key list for sitep h o t o s p r o v i d e d . A r e a s of k n o w n or s u s p e c t e denvironmental/health hazard were delineated and visually markedto limit unauthorized access. Topographic and elevation controlsfor site features and sampling points were developed from aerialreconnaissance photography and surface transit survey (See Figure4). Data detailing the extent and level of contamination to thesubject area was generated from chemical analyses of samplescollected (See Appendix C).

The following text will present a brief discussion of siteactivities, observations, and achievements during the separatephases of the field investigation. Emphasis will be placed onsite conditions and activities in relation to the projectwork/sampling plan, and on the accomplished work product. It isnot the intent of this document to provide either a chronologicalor detailed description and/or discussion of specific siteactivities. Also neither specific data generated nor subsequentinterpretation or inferences from collected or generated data areprovided in text discussions. Finally, the followinginvestigative phase discussions will not evaluate field teamperformance of anticipated field procedures and schedules beyondrelative success or completion percentage. The reader should

name


note that all field activities undertaken were done so underdirection of specifically developed project phase sampling plansand site safety plans, as well as established industry standardpractice. The reader is referred to these documents for desiredsupplemental information. For the reader's use and convenience,all collected and generated data from the field investigationwill be provided as appendices to this report in lieu of anydetailed or specific discussions.

viathc


PAXTON FIELD INVESTIGATION - PHASE I

Field Operations - June 24 Through July 3, 1985

Personnel A f f i l i a t i o n And Responsibilities

NAME

A.J. Hoyt

G. Nash

COMPANY/TITLE(POSITION)

JMA/Hydrogeologist

JMA/Geological Technician

C. Harriss

T. Fuhrhop

K. Hileman

M. Dinkel

M. Levine

JMA/Manage r-Dr i11i ng

JMA/Drilling Foreman

JMA/Drilling Technician

lEPA/Site Representative

IEPA/Project Coordinator

J. Janssen lEPA/Project Engineer

J. Franks IEPA

C. Floyd IEPA

L. Bennet IEPA

C. Gruntman IEPA

E. Linn IEPA

B. Wiatrolek IEPA

D. Smith Paxton Landfill/Manager

R. Nowicki & Nowicki & Associates, Ltd.two Assistants

ACTIVITIES

Project coordinator, site safetyo f f i c e r , f i e l d s a m p l e r ,documentation.

Site safety back-up, equipmentand instrumentation maintenance,f i e l d s a m p l e r , d e c o ncoordination

Drilling/Sampling coordination

Drilling, sampling

Dri l l ing , sampling backhoeoperator

On-site observer , p ro j ec tcoordination and documentation

In-house project coordination,site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Site visitor

Surveyors

E. Prendergast City of Chicago, Dept. of Site visitorEnvironmental Control

riathc


Pre-Investigation Data Collection Site Visits

Previous to any JMA site investigation activities, two sitev i s i t s were made to collect or genera te data for s i te a c t i v i t yp l a n n i n g . M. K r o e n i g of J M A , and J. Janssen and M. D i n k e l ofI E P A v i s i t e d the s i te on May 14 , 1985, to d e t e r m i n e s i tec o n d i t i o n s a n d c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r p r o j e c tp l a n n i n g , schedul ing and cost e s t i m a t i o n . On June 3, 1985, M.Dinkel of IEPA collected one surface l iquid sample each f rom theM a i n and S k i m m e r Lagoons , and the South Pond. Sample a n a l y s i swas p e r f o r m e d by E n v i r o d y n e Eng inee r s , Inc. 's a n a l y t i c a l lab ofS t . L o u i s , M i s s o u r i . A n a l y t i c a l r e s u l t s a r e p r o v i d e d i nAppendix C.

In i t ia l Site Reconnaissance

D u r i n g t h e i n i t i a l s i t e v i s i t o n J u n e 2 4 , 1985, J M Arepresen ta t ives A.J. Hoyt and G. Nash met w i t h D. S m i t h , P a x t o nL a n d f i l l M a n a g e r , a n d d i s c u s s e d g e n e r a l s i t e h i s t o r y a n dconditions. A pre l iminary site survey was conducted as a "walk-through" recon at a sa fe d i s tance f r o m po ten t ia l a i r b o r n ec o n t a m i n a n t s . Site access, zones of r e s t r i c t i o n due to s a f e t yh a z a r d s , and s p e c i f i c si te c o n d i t i o n s were noted. The ve ry lowlevel of navigable f lu ids w i th in the lagoons and South Pond wasnoted i m m e d i a t e l y . Based on the s a m p l i n g p l an u t i l i z i n g boatsand a f loa t ing d r i l l ing p l a t fo rm to sample these areas, problemsd u e t o " f l o a t i n g " s a m p l i n g l o c a t i o n s a c c e s s i b i l i t y w e r ean t i c ipa t ed . A.J. Hoyt repor ted th i s changed c o n d i t i o n to thea p p r o p r i a t e JMA r ep re sen t a t i ve and I E P A contact . M. K r o e n i g ,JMA Project Engineer relayed this i n f o r m a t i o n to IEPA managementfor potential m o d i f i c a t i o n s to anticipated field activit ies. Af o l l o w - u p w a l k - t h r o u g h o f t h e s i te w i t h t h e I E P A s i t erep resen ta t ive , M . D i n k e l , a n d J M A d r i l l i n g personnel v e r i f i e dthe probable need for changed f i e l d s a m p l i n g me thodo logy .However, the planned boat sampling approach was attempted u n t i lan a l t e r n a t e me thod was selected. Two a l t e r n a t e m e t h o d s w e r eimplemented, one attempted on the Sk immer Lagoon, and the otherused o n t h e M a i n L a g o o n . U l t i m a t e l y t h e b o a t m e t h o d w a sabandoned for sampl ing both the Sk immer Lagoon and South Pond.

Air Quality

An in i t i a l site survey was conducted immedia te ly f o l l o w i n gthe site recon to determine the general ambient air qual i ty. JMApersonne l , accompan ied by the I E P A represen ta t ive M. D i n k e l ,conducted the m o r e de ta i led , tho rough site recon in order toe s t a b l i s h t h e s p e c i f i c l e v e l ( s ) o f need f o r r e s p i r a t o r ypro tec t ion for on-si te ac t iv i t i es . (Note: For a l l subsequen td i s c u s s i o n , i t w i l l be assumed tha t the IEPA r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , M.D i n k e l , w a s p r e s e n t a s e i t h e r a n o b s e r v e r o r v o l u n t a r yaccompanying pa r t i c ipan t du r ing al l JMA on-site act ivi t ies unless


specifically noted otherwise.) Both a Foxboro OVA (organic vapora n a l y z e r ) and an HNU p h o t o i o n i z a t i o n detector were u t i l i z e d tocha rac t e r i ze po ten t ia l gas or vapor m i s t r e s p i r a t o r y haza rds .The i n i t i a l site air q u a l i t y survey, conducted on a w a r m , sunnyd a y , f o u n d the s i t e to be r e l a t i v e l y f r e e o f v o l a t i l econtaminants. The survey, conducted under Level C (respirator)p ro tec t ion , es tabl ished tha t r e s p i r a t o r s p rov ided adequa tepersonnel p ro tec t ion in the v i c i n i t y of the M a i n and S k i m m e rLagoons and for s i te w o r k in genera l . H o w e v e r , the South Pondwas an except ion in tha t a i r - b o r n e vo la t i l e s were detectedd o w n w i n d ad jacen t to the pond in c o n c e n t r a t i o n s h i g h enough topose a potential health hazard.

Spec i f i c si te a c t i v i t i e s p rov ided a d d i t i o n a l evidence fo rincreased r e sp i r a to ry p r o t e c t i o n beyond Level C r e sp i r a to r s .S t i r r i n g of pond s e d i m e n t s of the Sou th Pond, consp icous lylittered w i t h decomposed d rum debris, produced relatively highreadings on air qual i ty instruments . Later sampl ing act ivi t iesin the Soil/Crushed Drum Berm exposed a very high organic vaporconcentration necessitating up-graded respira tory protection forthat specific location. Bottom sediment probing in the M a i n andS k i m m e r L a g o o n s p r o d u c e d v a p o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s v a l i d a t i n gprecautions for constant a i r qua l i ty m o n i t o r i n g du r ing samplinga c t i v i t i e s i n those loca t ions . I n p a r t i c u l a r , m o n i t o r i n g fo rhydrogen sulf ide, hydrogen cyanide and cyanide salts, as well asgeneral o r g a n i c vapor c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , was conducted a lmostc o n t i n u o u s l y d u r i n g f i e l d ope ra t i ons where p o t e n t i a l exposureand/or release of con taminan t s was suspected. Chemical -speci f icm o n i t o r i n g was provided w i t h color imet ic a i r sampl ing (Draeger)tubes.

Site Safety

P r e l i m i n a r y s a f e t y p r e c a u t i o n s w e r e t o u s e L e v e l Crespiratory protection wi th f u l l dermal protection and emergencysupplied-air egress equipment for all si te sampl ing operationsu n t i l p roven o t h e r w i s e . H i g h h a z a r d m o n i t o r i n g was to beprov ided c o n s t a n t l y , and the p o s s i b i l i t y for Level B ( supp l i eda i r ) p ro t ec t i on was suspect. I n i t i a l and subsequent f i e l dactivit ies showed that Level B protection was necessary f o r : 1)All sampl ing act ivi t ies on or immedia te ly d o w n w i n d of the SouthPond , and 2) Test pi t l oca t i on # 04-5 of the S o i l / C r u s h e d D r u mBerm. The need to p r o v i d e level C p r o t e c t i o n w i t h emergencym o n i t o r i n g / e g r e s s c a p a b i l i t y f o r o the r s i te a c t i v i t i e s w a smainta ined. Level D (dermal) protection was thought adequate forall other on-site (non-hot zone) act ivi t ies . Personal sampl ingpumps w i t h f i l ters for air-borne heavy metals and PCB's were tobe worn where these contaminants were suspect.

name


Site Zone Delineat ion

A highly visible boundary to the known and/or suspect zonesof chemica l h a z a r d was es tabl ished. D r i v e n steel fence postswere ins ta l l ed and m a r k e d w i t h f l u o r e s c e n t r ed woven p l a s t i cbarr icade tape around the: 1) Ma in Lagoon, 2) Skimmer Lagoon, 3)South Pond , 4 ) So i l /Crushed D r u m B e r m , and 5) The C o n t a m i n a t e dSoil Area immedia te ly west of the Sk immer Lagoon. Addi t iona l ly ,the decontaminat ion /support areas for both the lagoons and SouthPond areas were es tab l i shed w i t h c o n t r a s t i n g b a r r i c a d e r i b b o nf l a g g i n g . The i n t e n t of this bar r icade r ibbon "fence" was top r o v i d e a c lear ly v i s i b l e w a r n i n g of h a z a r d areas as opposed toestablishing a t rue "barrier" to physical access.

Documentat ion

Two p r i m a r y fo rms of documenta t ion were provided by JMA forsi te a c t i v i t i e s , a f i e l d log and photo records. The p r i n c i p a ldocumentat ion was accomplished using a dedicated f ield log bookto record a l l p e r t i n e n t da ta and i n f o r m a t i o n about the f i e l dinvestigation. An attempt was made to judiciously and f a i t h f u l l yrecord all facts and f igures possible, per the fo rma t prescribedin the Phase I Sampl ing Plan. E f f o r t s have been made to provides u p p l e m e n t a l , pos t -ac tua l f i e l d a c t i v i t y da ta whe re on-s i tea c t i v i t i e s and pe r sonne l l i m i t a t i o n s precluded total, detai led"on-the-spot" d o c u m e n t a t i o n .

C e r t a i n b a s i c a r e a s o f d o c u m e n t a t i o n w e r e s t r i c t l ym a i n t a i n e d w i t h i n the f i e l d log book on a d a i l y basis. A d a i l ylog of specif ic site ac t iv i t i es including personnel on-site, worka c c o m p l i s h e d , a n d n o t a b l e o b s e r v a t i o n s , w a s s u b - h e a d e dindiv idual ly . Specific sampling points , procedures, and samplen u m b e r s w e r e recorded. W r i t t e n photo logs f o r a c t i v i t i e s o rr e l e v a n t f e a t u r e s not i n t ended to be sampled (bu t of poss ib lee n v i r o n m e n t a l s i g n i f i c a n c e ) we re recorded when p i c t u r e s we retaken . A i r q u a l i t y m e a s u r e m e n t s and o ther s i te s a f e ty re la tedconcerns were noted when d i f f e r i n g f rom established norms.

A supplemental documenta t ion was provided using photographicdocumentat ion w i t h a 35 mm SLR camera. The intent was to providea p h o t o g r a p h i c record of: 1) All s a m p l i n g l o c a t i o n s - d e t a i l i n gnearby and dis tant , d i s t inc t ive physical and/or cu l tura l fea turesthus f a c i l i t a t i n g re-location of the sampl ing point d u r i n g f u t u r esite visi ts ; 2) Site condi t ions pr ior to, du r ing , and a f t e r sitea c t i v i t i e s ; and 3 ) S p e c i f i c s i te c o n d i t i o n s n o t e w o r t h y o fpossible addi t ional f ie ld inves t iga t ion or concern for accuratesite character izat ion, especially when s igni f icant ly outside thecurrent scope of act ivi t ies .

nathc

John Mathvs & Associate*, Inc.

Contaminant Containment

During all field operations, a specifically designated,dedicated area of the site was set-up as a contaminantcontainment and reduction zone or decontamination area. Thisdecon area was established in conjunction with a field activitiessupport area, both areas being jointly located on the Raised(soil pad) Area in the southwest corner of the Main Lagoon. ThisRaised Area is believed to be either a permanent or latter lagoondisposal operation staging pad for heavy equipment, possiblydragline equipment and disposal truck off-loading.

The field operations support/decon area consisted of fiveseparate functional facilities: 1) An equipment storage andpreparation area, 2) A worker safety suiting and rest area, 3) Asample preparation and packaging area, 4) A personneldecontamination reduction line, and 5) A heavy field equipmentand sampling/drilling supplies decon area. The latter deconfacility was specifically sited to promote natural drainage ofdecon soap wash and rinse waters back into the Main Lagoon via ashallow depression gently sloping towards the lagoon at thesouthwest corner of the lagoon. The intent of the siteactivities support/decon area was to: 1) Restrict personnelaccess to a relatively "clean" area of the site while not suitedfor dermal protection, thereby minimizing worker exposure to sitecontaminants, 2) Provide a centralized location for supportactivities, and 3) Establish a decon facility to limit andcontain contaminant migration from the site hot zones as well asequipment used for field operations and sampling within those hotzones. All personnel and equipment used or entering in thedesignated hot zones were required to be deconned prior to exitor removal from the site support area.

Topographic and Elevation Contrcxl

JMA retained the services of Surdex Corporation ofChesterfield, Missouri, to develop topographic and elevationcontrol for field investigation activities. Surdex in turnprovided a local surveying company, Nowicki and Associates, Ltd.of Chicago, Illinois to locate site control points. JMApersonnel established several baselines to develop a referencinggrid pattern for sampling point map locations. End points ofthese baselines were tied into the overall mapping effort bySurdex and Nowicki and Associates.

Initially, four grid baselines, two each traversing roughlynorth-south and east-west, were established by the JMA fieldteam. One line ran east to west along the top of the high soilberm adjacent to the north edge of the Main Lagoon. A secondline, approximately perpendicular to the first, crossed the eastend of both the Main and Skimmer Lagoons in a north to southdirection. A third line ran east to west roughly parallel to the


first, and was Located just to the south of the Skimmer Lagoon,being almost tangent to the lagoon at its southwest point. Thefinal line was established in an approximate north to southdirection and was located on the raised berm area immediatelyflanking the South Pond along its eastern edge. Sampling pointswere located on the site topo map based largely on topographicand cultural features, with some reference to the site photo log.

Site Conditions and Quantities Surveys

Two initial site surveys were performed by JMA personnel inorder to assist field operations planning and coordination.First, the site was inspected as to the accessibility of fieldoperations equipment, especially vehicular traffic. Routes ofon-site travel were established to minimize traffic acrosscontaminated materials, and prevent damage and loss time frompotentially immobilized field equipment. Also, the ability touse the sampling boats/drilling platforms on the lagoons wasascertained as to accessibility once on lagoon liquid surfaces.Secondly, a rough field survey was conducted in order to quantify(by rough estimation) the potential removable contaminants in: 1)Liquid materials of the lagoons, and 2) Drums visible within thelagoons and Soil/Crushed Drum Berm areas.

Liquid material(s) quantities were found to be difficult tomeasure and estimate, and also were insufficient to facilitatesampling platform movement. The Skimmer Lagoon proved to havelittle or no liquid material, excluding occasional rainwater.The sampling/drilling platform, once dragged by truck to itsinitial sampling location on the Skimmer Lagoon, was effectivelymired at that location for the duration of all site activities.The sampling platform was abandoned at its launch point.

The Main Lagoon was initially probed as one of the finalactivities of the Phase I investigation. Probing was done withthin-walled metal electrical conduit (pipe) at six (6) locationsalong the south edge of the Main Lagoon. Each probing locationwas accessible by either a plywood sheet or a flat-bottomed'"John" boat positioned with one end on the lagoon bank forstability. Probing found that: 1) On average, liquids wererelatively thin near the lagoon banks, 2) The lagoon banks werenot steep-sided but rather were sloped and highly irregular inconfiguration, and 3) Significant volatile organic vapors werereleased from bottom sediments during probing, confirming theneed for respiratory protection for lagoon sampling activities.

The South Pond was found to be almost drained (or dried-up)of free standing water. Furthermore, a large quantity of drumsand drum debris were found within the drained pond bottom.Planned sampling efforts with the boats for the South Pond areahad to be abandoned for an alternative method.

name


Drum quantities, although of significant number, proved tobe a rather meaningless concern. Overall, excluding occasionalplastic drums, the vast majority of all drums observed wereeither crushed or decomposed beyond fluid holding capability.The large number of drums within the South Pond contained littlebeyond minimal liquids probably trapped from higher fluid levelsdue to spring time rain water collection in the pond. The vastmajority of contaminants that may have existed in those drumshave most likely been released to the pond waters and underlyingsediments. Approximately 120-150 drums were clearly visiblewithin the pond depression.

The north-south trending Soil/Crushed Drum Berm and anirregular, debris area on the west side of the South Pond bothcontained a significant number of drums but all or nearly alldrums appeared to be severely crushed. Although not asdecomposed as the South Pond drums, again, the potential forcontainment of chemical products within the drum debris isminimal. Estimation of quantities was difficult due to theburied nature of crushed drums. Overall, approximately 100 plusdrums were visible directly or from excavation with a backhoe.However, evidence from digging suggests that the vast majority ofcrushed drums still remain buried and inestimable.

Occasional drums were also visible within the Main Lagoonarea. A few drums were stuck in shallower lagoon liquid/sludgewhile some crushed drums were visible in the lagoon retainingsoil berms. The potential for non-visible drums within thefluids and sludge of the main lagoon existed but were largelyinestimable at that time. One drum was believed to have beenencountered in the six random probe locations tested along thesouth Main Lagoon edge.

Sampling

S a m p l i n g e f f o r t s d u r i n g Phase I a c t i v i t i e s u t i l i z e d av a r i e t y o f me thods f o r several u n i q u e l y d i s t i n c t i v e s a m p l i n gareas. S a m p l i n g methodo logy was selected to o p t i m i z e sampleaccuracy and e f f i c i e n c y in the f i e l d in d i r ec t reponse tospecific env i ronmenta l and/or subsurface conditions. Therefore,d i scuss ion of s a m p l i n g specif ics w i l l be addressed on an areaspecific basis.

Main Lagoon

S a m p l i n g e f f o r t s f o r t he M a i n Lagoon area were l a rge lyd e l e t e d d u r i n g Phase I due to m o b i l i t y p r o b l e m s o f t hes a m p l i n g / d r i l l i n g p l a t f o r m because o f the low lagoon f l u i dlevels. Only one sampling location 01-1-1 (Refer to Final SampleLocations plan, Figure 4, for all sample locations discussed) wassampled u s i n g a J o h n boat p a r t i a l l y beached on the lagoon bank .S u r f a c e oi l was dipped w i t h a s t a in l e s s steel (SS) ladle and


:ansferred d i rec t ly to a q u a r t glass sample jar . A 2 inchL a m e t e r clear plast ic excelon tube was then hand pushed andledge hammer-dr iven to refusal at approximately 9.5 feet. Theample tube was retr ieved by both d r i l l e r s us ing great e f f o r t• i t h p ipe wrenches . (Note: A Lagoon L i q u i d / S l u d g e log was• r e p a r e d f o r a l l M a i n L a g o o n p u s h t u b e s a m p l i n g / p r o b i n gocat ions . See Append ix B for all f i e l d s a m p l i n g logs.) Theube was emptied of f lu ids , and the under ly ing sludge and bottom-lost soil were containerized separately. The samples collected;ere stored for later composit ing.

M. Dinke l of IEPA collected a composi te sample of the)i I/sludges of both the Main and Skimmer Lagoons, and the South>ond s u r f a c e "muck" on Ju ly 3, 1985. T h i s sample was s u b m i t t e d:o Envirodyne Engineers, Inc., lab for D i o x i n analysis. Results>£ this analysis are provided in Appendix G.

Skimmer Lagoon

Sampling of the Skimmer Lagoon was l imited to three of theD r i g i n a l l y p lanned s ix loca t ions . The loca t ions sampled andLogged we re 02-1-3, 02-1-4, 02-1-5. The m a x i m u m depth ofp e n e t r a t i o n was a p p r o x i m a t e l y 15 ' in test hole 02-1-4, w h i l eno les ranged f r o m a p p r o x i m a t e l y 9 ' to 15' deep. Samples w e r ecollected for materials recovered f rom and mixed for each depthincrement of f ive feet s tar t ing f rom the lagoon surface. A totalo f seven s a m p l e s w e r e c o l l e c t e d a n d s t o r e d f o r f u t u r ecompositing.

S a m p l i n g me thodo logy w a s m o d i f i e d three t imes d u r i n gse imp l ing e f f o r t s i n t he S k i m m e r Lagoon . I n i t i a l l y , e f f o r t s t od ip - sample s u r f a c e m a t e r i a l s was re j ec ted due to very h i g hmater ia l viscosity. Next sampling by advancing 2 inch diameterexcelon tube through a 3" diameter pvc pipe outer casing by handwas a t tempted. A f t e r cons ide rab le e f f o r t , t he hole was re -started us ing the cat-head r ig th rough the d r i l l i n g p l a t f o r m .E x c e l o n t u b i n g , s ta in less steel (SS) sp l i t spoon samplers , andthe pvc casing were then advanced w i th the 140 pound split-spoonh a m m e r . W h e n the d r i l l i n g p l a t f o r m was f o u n d to be m i r e d a tlocation 02-1-3, the cat-head rig was setup on plywood sheets tosample the next location, 02-1-4. When recurring problems withspl i t spoons j a m m i n g inside the pvc casing aga in l imi ted the testh o l e d e p t h , t h e f i n a l s p l i t s p o o n w a s s a m p l e d / d r i v e n t oapproximate ly 15' wi thou t the pvc casing. Based on lesser casinghang-up problems wi th the excelon tube in comparison to the splits;poon sampler, the f ina l location, 02-1-5, was sampled w i th thecat-head rig, setup on plywood, d r i v i n g push tubes only.

The physical na tu re of the ma te r i a l s encountered in theS k i m m e r Pond caused severe s a m p l i n g problems. The d r i l l i n gplat form/boats were abandoned when found to be stuck in the heavysurface sludge - much like tar. Sampling access was possible by

nathc

John Mathe* & Asvociates, Inc.

l a y i n g p lywood sheets on the s ludge / lagoon s u r f a c e . H o w e v e r ,most equipment used in the sampling e f fo r t was abandoned due tothe h i g h cost of l abo r ious decon of the " t a r ry" m a t e r i a l s . Asplit-spoon hammer was abandoned for this reason.

Soil/Crushed Drum Berm

S a m p l i n g was done in ten (10) loca t ions , n u m b e r e d 04-1through 04-10, scattered along and around the nor th -sou thtrending Soil/Crushed Drum Berm. Sampling of buried subsurfacemater ia l s was possible by excavation of test pits w i t h a Case 580backhoe opera ted by K. H i l e m a n . A.J. H o y t sampled m a t e r i a l sw i t h i n the test pits using dedicated SS spoons placing materiald i r e c t l y i n t o 250 ml amber glass j a r s . One l o c a t i o n , 04-5,r e q u i r e d u s e o f Leve l B ( s u p p l i e d a i r S C B A ) r e s p i r a t o r yprotection for sampling.

In general , mater ia ls encountered w i t h i n the test pi ts wereh i g h l y v a r i a b l e bu t were largely ash, soi l and debr i s . W h e ne n c o u n t e r e d , v i s i b l e chemica l m a t e r i a l s w e r e p r e f e r e n t i a l l ysampled instead of soils. This occurred in locations 04-4, 04-5,0 4 - 6 , a n d 0 4 - 7 . S o i l s / a s h w e r e c o l l e c t e d i n each o f t h er e m a i n i n g test pits . A d d i t i o n a l l y , 04-7 was soi l s a m p l e d andnumbered 2143-04D1-7A. These samples were submit ted to the labon "hold" status. Add i t i ona l soil m a t e r i a l collected in testpits were composited and submitted for analyses. Soils f r o m 04-1, 04-2, and 04-3 became composite #2143-0401-11. Soils f r o m 04-7A, 04-8, 04-9, and 04-10 became composite #2143-04D1-12.

Contaminated Soil Area

A soi l compos i t e sample was collected f r o m the "o i ly"Contaminated Soil Area immediately west of the Skimmer Lagoon.F ive separa te loca t ions ( s h o w n as p lus ( + ) symbols on the F i n a lSample Locat ion plan, Figure 4) were sampled ind iv idua l ly into ac o m m u n a l SS bowl w i t h a SS spoon, and w e r e m i x e d u n i f o r m l y andcontainerized as sample #2143-05SS-6 in a 250 ml amber glass jar.Each l o c a t i o n sampled was m a r k e d w i t h a d r i v e n 2 x 2" hub . Thesample was sent to an anlytical lab, Envi rodyne Engineers of St.Louis , M i s s o u r i for analysis immedia te ly f o l l o w i n g Phase I f i e ldoperations.

In order to determine shallow sub-surface soil condi t ions inthe C o n t a m i n a t e d Soil Area , A.J. Hoy t dug three test holes byshovel to approximately one foot in depth. Buried chemical pastewas encountered in one hole w h i l e buried sludge was found in theo ther two holes; one as a t h i n seam, the o the r as the b o t t o mm a t e r i a l w i t h o u t ind ica t ion to extent d o w n w a r d .

name


Raised Area

At the request of M. Dinkel, site representative for theIEPA, two shallow test holes were dug approximately 6" deep by G.Nash in the site support/decon area. One 250 ml jar sample wascollected from the ash/soil/cinder material in each of the testholes. The samples were submitted to M. Dinkel, and wereanalyzed by Aqua Lab, Inc. of Bartlett, Illinois under directionof IEPA directly. The samples were found to contain high levelsof contaminants, especially lead dust and chlordane pesticidewell as other heavy metals. Results of these analysesprovided in Appendix F.

asyses are

No other sampling work was accomplished within the timeschedule constraints of the Phase I investigation. The majorityof anticipated sampling activities was omitted at that time dueto invalid or inefficient methodology from changed environmentalconditions. No efforts were made to sample any drums.

Factors Influencing Work Product

The ultimate work product of the Phase I field investigationwas severely hampered by unanticipated field working conditions.Fluid level recessions within the lagoons and South Pond: 1) Madesampling with the sampling/drilling platform virtually impossibleat that time, 2) ultimately caused the drilling platform tobecome permanently mired in the Skimmer Pond, 3) Delayed workprogress by loss of the drilling platform and need to work by"hand", and 4) Deleted sampling of the pond due to lost fieldtime from delays. Additionally, unexpected high temperaturescreated a heat stress problem. Severely decreased workefficiency, coupled with lost field time while mobilizingoperations for the transition from first to third shift drillingand sampling activities, detracted from the total work product.Regrouping for a second phase operation became necessary. JMAand IEPA arranged to meet to plan and schedule future fieldactivities.

nathc


PAXTON FIELD INVESTIGATION - PHASE II

Field Operations - August 8 through 19, 1985

Personnel A f f i l i a t i o n and Responsibil i t ies

NAME OOMPANY/TITLE(POSITION) ACTIVITIES

A.J. Hoyt JMA/Hydrogeologist Project coordinator, site safetyo f f i c e r , f i e l d s a m p l e r ,documentat ion

G. Nash JMA/Geological Technician Site safety backup, equipment andinstrumentation maintenance, fieldsampler, decon technician

M. Kosydor JMA/Drilling Coordinator Dr i l l i ng , sampling and deconc o o r d i n a t i o n , f i e l d sampler ,technical assistance

D. Gotto JMA/Drilling Foreman

M. Dinkel lEPA/Site Representative

M. Levine lEPA/Project Coordinator

Backhoe operator

O n - s i t e o b s e r v e r , p r o j e c tcoordination and documentation

In-house project coordination,visitor

site

R. Wiatrolek lEPA/Public Relations Site visitor to video tape site& Assistant & Communications Team sampling

Phase II - Introduction

The content of each Phase II specific subject discussioncan be accepted as being fully salient or in agreement with itscorresponding specific subject content from Phase I discussionunless otherwise noted. The topic will either be: 1) Fullyagreed to or pertinent, 2) Modified by addition or deletion orboth, 3) Irrelevant and changed altogether, or 4) Immaterial andcompletely deleted. In each case, the intent will be clearlystated at the beginning of the Phase II discussion.

Initial Site Reconnaissance

Another initial site recon was necessary at the outset ofPhase II field operations. Additional information was requiredto determine: 1) Vehicle accessibility for the extra testpit/sampling locations to the west of the Main Lagoon added tothe scope of work, 2) The extent of modifications to andadditional materials necessary to re-define and delineate theextended "hot" zone boundary barricade tape west of the MainLagoon, 3) The amount of air line equipment necessary to setup

name


Level B ( supp l i ed a i r - a i r l i n e ) r e s p i r a t o r y p r o t e c t i o n fors a m p l i n g personnel to a l l a n t i c i p a t e d loca t ions , and 4) Thevis ib le lateral extent of chemical con taminant seeps extendingwestward , m i g r a t i n g f r o m the M a i n Lagoon and Filled In Area ( s ) .

The concerns listed in the previous paragraph were addressedand answered in the f o l l o w i n g manner :

1. A " w a l k o v e r " of the sub jec t s a m p l i n g l oca t i ons w i t h i nthe Fil led-In and Seepage areas, general sampl ing areasd e s i g n a t e d a s 0 6 a n d 0 7 , r e s p e c t i v e l y , f o u n d t h elocations readi ly accessible to the excavat ion backhoe.

2. A "paced" m e a s u r e m e n t of the new ex ten t of the "hot"zone b o u n d a r y b a r r i c a d e tape f e n c i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s a n da i r l ine needed determined that pre-site es t imates wereaccurate and adequate enough to require no m o d i f i c a t i o n sto e x i s t i n g m a t e r i a l supp l i e s or orders . The b o u n d a r yb a r r i c a d e w a s m o d i f i e d t o encompass t h e n e w s a m p l i n gareas.

3. A visual survey d u r i n g a nor thwestern site "walk-over"w i t h M . D i n k e l o f I E P A f o u n d ev idence o f c o n t a m i n a n tm i g r a t i o n al l the way to the edge of the r a i s e d oldPaxton L a n d f i l l area. These observat ions were recordedand p h o t o g r a p h e d , and w e r e r epor ted to M. K r o e n i g , JMAProject Manager so that the w o r k scope and sampl ing plancould be m o d i f i e d if so desired by IEPA.

Air Qual i ty

Al l the a i r q u a l i t y i n f o r m a t i o n presented in Phase I i sf u l l y app l i cab le a n d r e l e v a n t f o r Phase I I c o n s i d e r a t i o n . T h ef o l l o w i n g areas o f a d d i t i o n a l a i r q u a l i t y i n f o r m a t i o n a r egeneral ly in the rea lm of site safety m o d i f i c a t i o n s w i t h spec i f i creference to resp i ra tory protect ion.

Based on the s a m p l e a n a l y s i s r e su l t s for the two soilsamples col lected fo r and a n a l y z e d by the I E P A fo r the o r i g i n a ls i te suppor t and decon a r e a , inc reased concern fo r r e s p i r a t o r yp r o t e c t i o n a n d p e r s o n a l e x p o s u r e m o n i t o r i n g f o r a i r b o r n en o n v o l a t i l e c o n t a m i n a n t s w a s n e c e s s a r y d u r i n g P h a s e I Ia c t i v i t i e s . P e r s o n a l a i r s a m p l i n g p u m p s w i t h e i t h e r a PCB orheavy metals f i l te r were used when work was done in areas stilldes igna ted for Level C ( r e s p i r a t o r ) p ro t ec t i on . A l s o , the needto w e a r r e s p i r a t o r s due to h i g h w i n d c o n d i t i o n s on-s i t e was ada i ly f ie ld call by the JMA and IEPA Safety Representatives. Thespecific need was never ordered dur ing Phase II operat ions. Theuse of m i n i m u m Level D ( d e r m a l ) p r o t e c t i o n for a l l on - s i t eac t iv i t ies on foot was s t r i c t ly required for Phase II ac t iv i t ies .

name


D u e t o t h e a n t i c i p a t e d p o t e n t i a l r e lease o f l a r g ec o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f h i g h h a z a r d v o l a t i l e a n d / o r v a p o r o u sc o n t a m i n a n t s d u r i n g test p i t e x c a v a t i o n s w i t h the backhoe , a l ls i te e x c a v a t i o n and s a m p l i n g o p e r a t i o n s were p e r f o r m e d unde rLevel B ( s u p p l i e d air - air l i n e ) r e s p i r a t o r y p ro tec t ion .C o n t i n u o u s a i r q u a l i t y m o n i t o r i n g w a s n o t r e q u i r e d b y s a f e t yrequi rements under Level B but was ma in ta ined when and whereverposs ib le in order to p r o v i d e a d d i t i o n a l da ta about p o t e n t i a la i rborne con taminan t release d u r i n g f u t u r e r e m e d i a l e x c a v a t i o nwork .

Based on the documented Phase I organic vapor release d u r i n ge x c a v a t i o n of the Soi l /Crushed D r u m Berm test pi t 04-5 , and thesubsequent exposure and physical response of a JMA worker who wasi m m e d i a t e l y d o w n w i n d d u r i n g t he release, t he test p i t was a i rsampled w i th a co lor imet r ic chemically-sensi t ive Draeger tube forphosgene. This con taminan t , suspected to have been released, wasnot present when tested for on August 8, 1985.

It should be noted that the presence of cyan ides as s o d i u mand/or potassium salts of cyanide was c o n f i r m e d d u r i n g sampl ingof the Skimmer Lagoon in both invest igat ion phases. The hydrogens u l f i d e mon i to r / a l a rm may have been m o m e n t a r i l y tripped in thesame area du r ing Phase II excavation.

Site Safety

Safety precautions for Phase II operations were upgradedoverall in comparison to Phase I protection. Dermal protectionfor Level C and B were identical while minimal Level D dermalprotection was required for all on-site activities in Phase IIwork. Where Level C respiratory protection was still deemedadequate, the same air quality monitoring requirements andemergency egress equipment was available.

The majority of sampling work and backhoe excavation wasdone by workers equipped with supplied air with air-linerespirator equipment and cascade air tank supply systems. Onecascade system was established in a mobile trailer so that itcould be moved by pickup truck to the vicinity of sampling andback to the site delivery air cylinder drop locationapproximately 40 - 50 feet south of the southeast corner of theSkimmer Lagoon. This system was set up to supply sampling,safety, and documentation personnel with breathing air, andprovide a hook-up for the sample processing and/or decontechnician, if deemed necessary. The need for this backupcapability never materialized. A second cascade system was setup in the backhoe cab for the operator so that he could maintainfull mobility. All air-line respirator equipment was providedwith an "in-line" emergency egress 5-minute air bottle system.Because no operational alarm system existed on the air supplysystem, a technician was available at all times to respond


immediately to an on-site emergency or low air supply. Thistechnician also had equipment available to make an emergency"hot" zone ingress if necessary. During Phase II samplingoperations, no "true" emergency situations occurred to require anemergency egress or ingress. However, the backhoe operator didmake one evacuation from the backhoe cab on his 5 minute egressair bottle when his cascade system air cylinder ran out of airduring excavation of one test pit, #07-2.

A self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) supplied airsystem was kept on site as a back-up system for emergencysituations, and as the air supply for resampling Soil/CrushedDrum Berm test pit #04-5. The SCBA was used briefly for thelatter purpose only.

As referenced previously under air quality, personal airsampling pumps with either PCB or heavy metals filters were usedfor potential personal exposure monitoring during the limitedLevel C operations in the vicinity of the Main Lagoon.

Finally, site sampling activities were considered in orderto avoid any recurrence of work progress efficiency problems dueto heat stress, such as those encountered during Phase I samplingactivities. Phase II sampling activities (excluding theSoil/Crushed Drum Berm resampling) were planned, mobilized andcarried out during evening and night time hours. Late shifthours also helped alleviate concerns for problems from wind blownparticulate contaminants. In general, winds in the site vicinitydecreased substantially or were virtually nonexistent during thenight time, excluding storm activity.

Non-Agency (Supplier) On-Site Visitors and Supplies

Due to the necessity for delivery and pickup of equipmentand supplies for Phase II investigation activities, concern forpotential exposure to delivery personnel and off-site transportof site contaminants arose in light of the IEPA background soilsanalyses findings. The decision was made and enforced jointly byJMA and IEPA to either protect returnable equipment/supplies orprovide decon• of such items if exposed to any contaminantconcentrations of significant concern. Air cylinders wereprotected by storage on plastic sheeting and transport on-siteeither in a pickup truck bed, the cascade trailer bed, or insidethe backhoe cab. The rental cascade trailer was kept off of andaway from any grossly contaminated materials. The rental backhoewas steam-cleaned two complete times in order to remove allgrossly contaminated materials encountered during excavation oftest pits and backfilling operations. All other rental gear on-site was cleaned and deconned prior to return. Supplier'sdelivery personnel were not allowed site access beyond the aircylinder drop point near the Skimmer Lagoon.

name


Site Zone Delineation

The areas delineated as to potential or known chemicalhazard and marked as such by high visibility boundary barricaderibbon for an access restriction warning during Phase I weremaintained for Phase II operations with the followingmodifications. The section of boundary fencing running north-south along the berm on the western end of the Main Lagoon wasremoved and replaced with boundary barricade fencing extendingwestward to the western site edge. This new area enclosesobserved contaminant seeps and materials seen all the way to thesurface dropoff to the adjacent western landfill property. Also,the initial site support/decon area was included as part of thehot zone based on IEPA lab results.

Documentation

Literary and photographic documentation procedures, format,and methodology for Phase II operations were in strict agreementwith those followed for Phase I activities. All samplinglocations were marked with clearly labelled wooden stakes andphotographed to verify specific location.

Additionally, photographic documentation of the physicalcondition of the rental backhoe used for test pit excavation wasthoroughly performed before and after field use. A copy of eachset of photos was provided to the rental company, the former setsent by certified mail delivery timed and dated to prove pre-existing backhoe defects and damages prior to use. A copy ofboth sets of photos were also provided to IEPA. The purpose ofthis photographic documentation was to provide photographicevidence detailing preexisting rental unit conditions asliability protection against unwarranted claims for damagesduring unit use on-site. JMA also wished to provide validationfor legitimate claims potentially possible for damages caused byexcavation of highly acidic or corrosive materials known to existon-site, as well as to protect IEPA from illegitimate claims.There were no claims by the rental agency.

Contaminant Containment

Phase II operations established a site support/deconfacility at a different location than that from Phase I. Theprimary logic behind location setup and the facility design wasessentially the same with these notable modifications. First,the location was selected to move off of the Raised Area, aformer location found to contain significant health hazard fromknown contaminants. The new location was on soil of a largelydiffereing physical and material nature. Second, the newlocation, being located right at the entrance to the site area,was convenient as a drop point for site-delivered supplies and

Yiafhc


equipment. Third, the location is conducive to limiting siteaccess and potential exposure to delivery personnel and hiredsecurity guards. Fourth, the location was in a pivotal positionfor access to all site sampling locations. Fifth, an enclosedsafety equipment and personnel suiting/resting station (a tent)was set up to provide protection from the elements. Also, theconcerns for containment and channeling of deconned contaminantsand spent decon fluids were drastically modified for Phase II.Due to the relatively high level of ambient contaminants in ashand cinder laden soils on-site, an area of similar soil materialwas selected adjacent to both the staging/sample prep/personneldecon area and the Skimmer Lagoon. Spent, nonchemical deconfluids were not anticipated to contribute any significantaddition to the contaminants already present on-site. Finally,based on the relatively crude method of sampling chosen, and theintent to composite much of the materials to be sampled, the needto decon the backhoe bucket between sampling locations within anarea to be composited was deemed unnecessary. Furthermore, deconof the bucket between specific sampling areas was adequatelyachieved by thoroughly digging and stirring the bucket intosurface soils of the next area to be sampled.

Topographic and Elevation Control

The Phase I discussion remains fully pertinent and appliableto Phase II requirements. No further discussion is required.

Site Condition And Quantities Surveys

The following additional points of discussion combined, withthe applicable discussion from Phase I provide a completediscussion for the Phase II investigation. The only relevantaddition to site conditions discussion was that mentioned underinitial site recon. Site conditions were inspected and recordedin regards to: 1) Vehicular access to new sampling locations, 2)Surface evidence of previously unobserved environmentalcontamination (ie. seeps), and 3) New boundary limits for themodified site restriction/delineation barricade ribbon fencing.

Additional activities were performed by JMA personnel inorder to provide more data to that acquired during Phase Iinvestigation of fluid quantities within the Main Lagoon. Ninemore locations in the eastern lagoon half, a deeper area of moreextensive liquids, were probed with either a hand-pushed 2 inchdiameter excelon sampling tube while sampling or a metal thin-walled electrical conduit. Probing by hand push only, not sledgehammer-driven probes, showed a depth range of from approximately3 to 6.5 feet. Drums were believed to have been encounteredwhile probing two of the nine locations.


U n f o r t u n a t e l y , s eve re d i f f i c u l t y i n m o v i n g s a m p l i n gpersonnel and equ ipmen t in the J o h n boat on the M a i n Lagoonprevented more extensive f l u i d probing activit ies, especially forthe data poor western area of the M a i n Lagoon.

Sampling

As per the Phasewill be dealt with on

Main Lagoon

I discussions, Phase II sampling activitiesan area specific basis.

Phase II sampling within the Main Lagoon was limited tosampling of four probe locations during the liquid quantitiesprobing survey, and hand dipping two surface soil samples. Thefour probe locations, designated 01-BS-l through Ol-BS-4 (referto Figure 4, Final Sample Locations Plan) were sampled by hand-pushed (to refusal) and retrieved 2" diameter excelon tubing.The tubes were left in the original, Phase I decon area untilcomposited at the end of all field sampling operations. Surfaceoil samples were hand-dipped with a SS ladle at locations Ol-L-6.

The following summarizes the fate of the oil/sludge samplescollected during both Phase I and II samplings. The upper fluidmaterials from locations 01-1-1 and Ol-BS-4 were composited toform Ol-BL-5, while fluids from 01-BS-l through Ol-BS-3 werecomposited to form Ol-BL-6. The lower sludge materials fromlocations 01-1-1 and Ol-BS-4 were composited to form Ol-S-5,while sludges from 01-BS-l through Ol-BS-3 were composited toform Ol-S-6. "Soil-like" material encountered in the bottom oflocation 01-1-1, approximately 9 - 9.5 deep, was containerizedindividually as sample #2143-01BS-I-1. Liquid samples collectedat locations 01-L-5&6 were submitted individually. All sampleswere submitted to Envirodyne Engineers, Inc., for chemicalanalyses.

Seven (7) test pits were excavated around and adjacent tothe Main Lagoon. Test pit 01-1 was located at the south end of ashallow north-south depression, at the southwest corner of theMain Lagoon's west end. Five test pits, locations 01-2 through01-6 were dug in the Raised (soil pad) Area, generally adjacentto the lagoon fluid surface but within the bank material toprevent inflow of lagoon surface liquids.

Note: For all test pit sampling locations excavated with thebackhoe during Phase II operations, the intended samplinglogic was to collect material from each test pit asrepresentative material of the strata encountered and tocomposite like materials from all or predesignated sets oftest pits w i t h i n each sampling area. The threematerials/strata generally anticipated to be encounteredwere: 1) Overlying relatively uncontaminated fill or cover

name


material, 2) Heavily contaminated either buried or lateralseepage materials from the lagoons, and 3) Relativelyuncontarninated underlying either fill soils, earlierlandfill, or possibly natural materials. These threematerial or strata zones were designated as Dl, D2, andD3, respectively, in all sampling nonenclature. Exceptfor two locations in the Raised Area of the Main Lagoon,which were thick, relatively uniform, uncontaminatedmaterials overlying concrete or "concrete-1 ike" weldedash material, the upper (Dl) zone was generally terminatedat or near the five foot depth. The middle (D2) zonerarely extended to its maximum ten foot depth. The bottom(D3) zone reached a maximum excavation depth of 14 feetonly twice. When unique subsurface conditions wereencountered in test pits, an additional sample wouldusually be taken, especially where heavy chemicalcontamination was suspect. In general, there is nodirect, strict stratigraphic correlation of material typeor depth between samples collected within the Dl, D2, andD3 sampling zones beyond the general 0-5 feet, 5-10 feet,and greater than 10 feet, respectively, planned samplingintervals.

"sub-zone"As many

The reader should also note that when additional sampleswere collected within a test pit, the strata sampled wasassigned the next "D" designation or a uniquedesignation to preserve stratigraphic sequence,as five samples were collected from one 14 foot depth testpit by this method. Also, it should be noted that, forthe unique conditions encountered during test pitexcavations for Paxton-Phase II, the far more commondecision was to retain, for individual analysis, theuniquely dissimilar samples from each test pit exhibitingvastly differing strata.

The six Main Lagoon - Raised Area test pits ranged in bottomdepth from approximately 4.5 to 13.5', and, generally,encountered silty material overlying very hard, compacted orcemented slag material, "concrete-like" in density. Refusal tofurther excavation terminated all but one Main Lagoon area testpit. Buried landfill rubbish was seen in the bottom of two pits,and only one pit had a trickle of chemical liquid into the pit atdepth, in the rubbish material.

The samples collected from each depth interval of pits 01-1through 01-3 were composited to produce composite samples #2143-01D1-8 and #2 143-01D2-8. The samples collected from pits 01-4through 01-6 as "full depth" samples were composited to formsample #2143-01D1-9.

nathc


The final test pit dug near the Main Lagoon, 01-7 wasexcavated into the eastern face of the high berm immediately eastof the lagoon. This test pit was excavated to characterizematerials used to construct the high berms enclosing the MainLagoon. The excavation extended several feet into the berm froma point approximately eleven of the estimated 15 foot berm heightdown to a level approximately even with the land surface at thatlocation. In general, materials in the berm were silty mixedconstruction/rubble debris. The three samples collected weresubmitted individually for analysis.

One noteworthy observation was recorded during excavation ofTest Pit 01-7. While digging during the very cool (approximately50OF.) and humid night, a very dense release of white vapor wasencountered in the hole. Materials encountered within the bermwere found to be warm to hot to the touch, even through multiplelayers of protective gloves. It is believed that the white vaporrepresents water vapor in the night air that entered the openexcavation. However, no explanation has been offered to explainthe high internal heat feature of the berm itself.

Skimmer Lagoon

Three test pits, 02-1 through 02-3, were excavated adjacentto the south and eastern Skimmer Lagoon edges within the bankmaterials, again to avoid chemical sludge inflow. The test pitsranged in depth from approximately 10.5 to 14 feet. Each testpit proved to be uniquely different, and all samples collectedwere submitted individually for analysis. One pit encounteredwhat appeared to be zones of buried sludge material very similarto that found in the Skimmer Lagoon borings from Phase I.Another pit encountered what appeared to be a chemical sludgeseep zone. The last pit found mixed silty material and landfillrubbish overlying hard, compacted, cemented material causingexcavation refusal at 11'.

South Pond

A total of four test pi ts were excavated to charac ter ize theSouth Pond c o n t a m i n a t i o n . Three test p i t s , 03-1 t h r o u g h 03-3,located a round the pond body edge, were excavated to depthsranging f r o m approx ima te ly 3.5 to 7 feet into the pond sediments .I n gene ra l , m a t e r i a l s encoun te red w e r e o r g a n i c " m u c k " soi lso v e r l y i n g v a r i o u s f i l l m a t e r i a l s , m o s t l y debr i s , a n d some purec h e m i c a l paste. Crushed d r u m s w e r e encoun te red in two o f thethree pits. Two pits were terminated due to r e fusa l on submergedconcre te slabs, w h i l e the t h i rd was t e r m i n a t e d due to s i d e w a l lf a i l u r e into the pi t negat ing fu r the r excavat ion gain. The f l u i dlevel f r o m w a t e r w i t h i n t h e pond s e d i m e n t s / m u c k r a n g e d f r o mi m m e d i a t e l y be low to a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1.5' be low the s e d i m e n tsurface. Two samples were collected at each test pit locat ion.

Yiathe


The fourth test pit, 03-4, was excavated transverse to theinlet channel gully immediately upgradient of the pond body. Thetest pit was dug approximately 14' deep and encountered highlyvariable and contaminated materials, including a thin zone ofchemical paste. A total of five samples were collected.

Based on the highly variable nature of materials encounteredin the South Pond test pits, and the wide ' "sampled, all samples collected from thisindividually for analysis.

rangearea were

of depthssubm i t ted

Soil/Crushed Drum Berm

Four of the test pits excavated in the Soil/Crushed DrumBerm during Phase I operations were resampled during Phase II.The chemical specimens collected previously from pits 04-4through 04-7 were found to be of insufficient quantity forlaboratory analysis. Therefore, these locations were resampledto provide additional testing material, and were submittedindividually for analysis. In order to distinguish the Phase IIsamples from the Phase I samples, an additional post scriptnumeral, "-1", was added to the original Phase I sample numbersconverting them to Phase II sample numbers.

Contaminated Soil Area

One test pit was excavated in the approximate center of theContaminated Soil Area immediately west of the Skimmer Lagoon.The location was selected to be approximately centered withrespect to the five surface soil sampling points of the Phase Isoil composite sample #2143-0553-6. These composite samplingpoints appear as plus ( + ) symbols on Figure 4. The Test Pit wasdug to a depth of approximately 10.5 feet where refusal wasencountered on very hard, "cemented" material. Overlyingmaterials were mixed and layered, silty and "chalk-like", andincluded landfill rubbish in the lower pit zone. Three zoneswere sampled and submitted individually for analysis.

Two notable observations were recorded for the contaminatedsoil zone during Phase II operations. First, in one of the threeshallow pits hand dug during Phase I, a "lava-like" inflow ofsludge was observed and photographed upon return to the locationfor Phase II. Second, the backhoe had severe difficulty movingaround on or across the main body of the Contaminated Soil Area.The surface materials appeared to be relatively loose, lowdensity silty ash material underlain at a depth of approximately6" to one foot by either softer or sludgy material. The backhoefoundered badly, became nearly mired, and almost tipped over fromrutting under the drive tires. Traverse of the area causedsevere rutting. Ironically, no sludge material was encounteredin the backhoe dug test pit.

Yiathc


Filled In Area

Based on aerial photography provided by C. G r u n t m a n of IEPAd u r i n g Phase I operat ions, s ampl ing ac t iv i t i es for Phase II wereextended to the areas wes tward f r o m the M a i n Lagoon. E x a m i n a t i o no f pho tographed l a n d f i l l o p e r a t i o n s f r o m b e f o r e t h e d i sposa lf a c i l i t y was closed suggests that the area i m m e d i a t e l y west ofthe M a i n Lagoon may have been f i l l e d in . The area appeared tohave been the west end of the o r i g ina l M a i n Lagoon. This area isnow a ra ised , n e a r l y level soil and deb r i s f i l l m a t e r i a l area.The o r i g i n a l M a i n L a g o o n p r o b a b l y ex tended a d i s t a n c e of 75 to100' w e s t w a r d of the e x i s t i n g M a i n lagoon w e s t e r n edge. Thephotographs also suggest that an area of probable or ig ina l M a i nLagoon seepage f l u i d s ex i s t ed f u r t h e r w e s t w a r d ou t beyond theo r i g i n a l e x t e n t o f t he M a i n Lagoon . T h i s seepage zone e x t e n d sthe area of concern an a d d i t i o n a l 75 to 100* w e s t w a r d , thusextending the increased area of inves t iga t ion approx ima te ly 150t o 2 0 0 f e e t t o t h e w e s t . These t w o s e p a r a t e a r e a s o finvestigation and sampling are referred to as the Filled In Areaand Seepage Area for f u t u r e discussion.

Two test p i ts w e r e excava ted in the F i l l ed In Area d u r i n gPhase II sampling operations. The test pits, 06-1 and 06-2, weredug to a p p r o x i m a t e l y 11.5 and 14 f ee t , r e spec t ive ly . Pits i d e w a l l c a v i n g c a u s e d t e r m i n a t i o n o f p i t 0 6 - 2 . O n e p i te n c o u n t e r e d b u r i e d l a n d f i l l r u b b i s h w i t h s o m e p o s s i b l econ taminan t "seep" m a t e r i a l , all u n d e r l a i n by dry si l ty chemicalm a t e r i a l s . The other test pi t f o u n d a zone of heavy s ludge /o i lc o n t a m i n a t i o n m i x e d w i t h soil a n d l a n d f i l l r u b b i s h , g r a d i n gd o w n w a r d i n to p r e d o m i n a n t l y s ludge /o i l s a t u r a t e d l a n d f i l lrubbish. Three zones were sampled w i t h i n each test pit but , dueto the h ighly d i f f e r i n g mater ia l s encountered, all of the sampleswere submit ted ind iv idua l ly for analysis .

Seepage Area

Two test p i t s w e r e e x c a v a t e d in the seepage a rea d u r i n gPhase II site activit ies. The test pits, 07-1 and 07-2, were dugto approx ima te ly 12.5 and 8.5 feet, respectively. Test pit 07-2w a s t e r m i n a t e d d u e t o s i d e w a l l c a v i n g o f t h e p i t f r o m s o f t ,u n d e r l y i n g mater ia ls . Below a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 feet in depth, bothtest pi ts revealed oil/sludge sa tura ted noncohesive m a t e r i a l s , aposs ib le seepage zone. The deeper p i t p e n e t r a t e d i n to anu n d e r l y i n g packed g r a v e l / d e b r i s zone , then on i n t o a n o t h e rp o s s i b l e seep z o n e a t t h e tes t p i t b o t t o m . S a m p l e s w e r ecollected for each of the representat ive m a t e r i a l s encountered inthe p i t s , three samples f r o m 07-1 and two f r o m 07-2. The "Dl"zone samples w e re c o m p o s i t e d to f o r m sample I 2143-07D1-3. The"D2" zone samples were combined to f o r m composite sample #2143-0 7 D 2 - 3 . These two c o m p o s i t e s a m p l e s and t he i n d i v i d u a l s ample#2143-0703-1 ( f r o m the b o t t o m of test p i t 07-1) w e r e s u b m i t t e dfor analysis .


Raised Area

D i s c u s s i o n of Phase I I s a m p l i n g in th is area was coveredf u l l y in the e a r l i e r text on the M a i n Lagoon s a m p l i n g . P leaserefer that section of the Phase II text.

QA and QC Samples

To provide QA/QC for sampling procedures dur ing the Phase IIi n v e s t i g a t i o n , a s t a t i s t i c a l l y r ep resen ta t ive n u m b e r of QA/QCsamples was collected and submi t ted for analysis . QA sampleswere duplicate samples that were containerized at the same t imeas the o r i g i n a l samples , bu t were p rov ided separa te s a m p l enumbers. A total of four QA samples were submitted discretely tothe a n a l y t i c a l lab so as to appear nonre l a t ed w i t h r e f e r e n c e tothe originals.

QC samples w e r e f i e l d - p r e p a r e d b lank samples tha t w e r eprocessed and c o n t a i n e r i z e d under f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s in the samemanner as the type of sample they are referenced to. These f ieldbanks consis t o f "pure" s i l ica sand for so i l / so l id m a t r i xsamples , a n d d i s t i l l e d w a t e r f o r w a t e r / f l u i d m a t r i x samples .Field blanks are intended to show ambient contaminants introducedto f i e l d s a m p l e s due to : 1 ) S p e c i f i c o n - s i t e l o c a t i o ne n v i r o n m e n t a l i n f l u e n c e s , 2 ) S a m p l e s h a n d l i n g / p r o c e s s i n gprocedures, and 3) Sampling equipment decon inadequacies. Due tothe r a the r obv ious d i f f i c u l t y i n "h id ing" these samples w i t h i nthe r e g u l a r sample sets d e l i v e r e d to the a n a l y t i c a l lab , f i e l dblank sample numbers consist of the sample collect ion/preparat ionlocation number p re f ixed w i t h the project number and postscriptedw i t h a "-99". A to ta l of f o u r f i e l d b l a n k s amp le s , one l i q u i dand three sol ids , w e r e p repa red and s u b m i t t e d to the lab foranalysis.


Factors In f l uenc ing Work Product

T h e u l t i m a t e w o r k p r o d u c t o f t h e P h a s e I I f i e l di n v e s t i g a t i o n w a s , i n g e n e r a l , a r e l a t i v e l y c o m p l e t e a n drepresentative data package for site characterization of the sites p e c i f i c areas sampled . O v e r a l l , t he f i e l d o p e r a t i o n s w e r ecar r ied out w i t h i n the t ime f r a m e and budget, and by the methodsprescr ibed by the pro jec t sampl ing p l an and scope of w o r k . Allscheduled f ie ld act iv i t ies , excluding more detai led l iquid /s ludgeq u a n t i t i e s p r o b i n g and s a m p l i n g fo r the west end o f the M a i nL a g o o n , w e r e comple t ed as p l anned . A m i n o r a m o u n t o f t i m e waslost due to adverse weather condit ions, and some m i n o r problemsnot w o r t h de ta i l ing . However , overall , the work product was nots i g n i f i c a n t l y affected or reduced f r o m that projected for PhaseII operations.

Sincerely,

JOHN MATHES & ASSOCIATES, INC.

A.J. HoytHydrogeolog ist

AJH/dh

Yiathc


CAOO

COOKCOUNTY

Not To Scale SITE LOCATION

FIGURE 1

Berm of Soil andCrushed Drums

s.

N

Not To Scaleviathc (IMMEDIATE AREA OF SITE

John Mathes & Associates, Inc. FIGURE 2

APPENDICES


••ner«t« dumping

MAIN LAGOON -RAISED AREA

ALBURN

INCINBRAYOR

FILLED IN AREA

SEEPAGE AREA

CONTAMINATEDSOIL AREA

Allynlutlg*

LAND&

LAKES

LANDFILL)

ditch

MAINLAGOON

CONTAMINATIONREDUCTION Z

SOIL/CRUSHEDDRUM BERM

HOT ZONE

Project Location

SOUTHPOND

LEGEND

Not To Scale

Hot Zone

Contamination Reduction Zone

Potentially Contaminated Cinder Fill Area

£3 Buried Seepage Area

PROJECT AREA AND ACCESSRESTRICTION ZONES

FIGURE 3

,,:!\

LEGEND

• TEST PIT

A HAND-DIPPED LIQUID SAMPLE

. PUSH TUBE SLUDGE/LIQUID SAMPLE

+ SOIL COMPOSITE LOCATION (05-SS)

N O T E : FINAL SAMPLE L O C A T I O N NUMBERS

C O R R E S P O N D TO E X P L O R A T I O N / S A M P L I N G N A L SAMPLE LOCATIONS200 LOG/BORING NUMBERS ( A P P E N D I X B) FIN«L ^>

=3 AND BORING NUMBERS PROVIDED FIGURE 4IN A N A L Y T I C A L D A T A ( A P P E N D I X C)

n Mathes & Associates. Inc.

APPENDIX C:

Analytical Data

NOTE: Bor ing n u m b e r s cor respond to test pitand Lagoon L i q u i d / S l u d g e L o g / b o r i n gn u m b e r s i n A p p e n d i x B( E x p l o r a t i o n / S a m p l i n g L o g s ) and theF i n a l S a m p l e L o c a t i o n s s h o w n i nFigure 4.


BOMW SAMPLE

(I) 01BS-I-1,

EP Toxicity

S* J3 OX Pt I/I

«q/i »q/i uq/l «q/l aq/l•ou M

(J 3uq/1

Smg/l

H U

uq/l "q/l8

ug/q

1496 19500

zu

uq/q

5 •

m ci« "1-H ou. o.

•C

No Flash

•qAq

108.7

Bou.

8•q/q21.6

EP Toxicity

MKIN8

OI-7

(0(81

OI-7

(4)OI-7

Ol-tOI-7

_S*SEtL "V1

0101-7 40.00]0101-8 40.00201D1-9 <:0.00201D2-7 <0.002

0102-8 <!0.0020102-10 '.-e.0020103-2 -lO.OOJ!0103-7 0.004

&•9/1

0.3710.1200.2420.352

1.54

0.3100.9280.204

s•q/l

0.025<0.010<0.0100.026

<0.010

0.022<0.010

0.031

K(J

•q/l

<0.040.071<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04

<0.04

trX

uq/l

0.25

0.21

0.28

0.21

0.28

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

ft

aq/l

<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10

.

mq/1

<0.0020.0050.007

<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002

O.OOS

*uq/l

0.88

1.12

1.07

1.04

1.05

0.72

0.97

1.28

8•q/l

<0.040.4200.221<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04

•HZ

•q/l

0.072<0.04<0.040.069<0.040.059<0.04<0.04

cN

mg/1

0.596<0.04<0.040.508<0.040.296<0.040.673

1-1H

uq/l

4.91

16.0312.979.87

9.01

6.32

7.4816.46

H

Uug/1

<34215<310<3<3

15.0

i

Uuq/q

4.121.00.6

2.95

1.00

4.30

0.75

1.00

•6•H«W

3uq/q

2.4<1

40.0<1 .0

<1<10.0

29.3

72.0

0|l-t

§

1uq/q

0.07S<0.04

2.71

0.13

1.09

<0.040.28

0.314

•* *J•H a*> 0

'i V& &

Y«S NoYes NoY«S NOY»8 NoY*S NOY«S NoYes NoYes No

uO

8

Ok BmLt BrnBrownBrownGray

Dk Brn*

Brown

01D1-7

01D1-801D1-901D2-701D2-80102-1001D3-20103-7

s.6

12127

128

136

U 1-« *> '[>i t • ti£ 4J O C

10 r* v

SolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolid

aO

.43

.20

.15

.29

.29

.53

.59

.37

NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo

M Ca -H•* ou. a.•C

Flash

FlashFlash

FlashFlashFlashFlashFlash

M^H•HO

0.04

2.82.79

0.05

<0.5

<0.5

<0.50.06

V*j5

8.90

24.7822.70

9.78

27.5013.84,36.1519.11

•HrH

91.1075.2277.3090.2272.5086.1663.8580.90

vfirHO

INnCN

uq/q uq/q

oovCN

sIS

(I) LOG 01-1-1Bottom Sludge/Soil

(Z) Composite of Dl Depth LOG 01-1 (0-31)01-2 (0-5' )01-3 (0-3.2')

<3) Composite of Dl Depth LOG 01-4 ( 0 - 1 0 . 5 ' )01-5 ( 0 . 8 . 5 ' )01-6 ( 0 . 3 . 2 ' )

(4) Composite of 02 Depth LOG 01-1 ( 3 - 8 ' )01-2 (5-13' )01-3 ( 3 . 2 - 5 . 3 1 )

NOTCt "rit - Int«rf«r«no«" • Inaufficicnt mainpl* quantityil- See attached tables

MAIN LAGOON1 of 8

ui n -oft CD U

UlU

tr> ja ui 01n o . u i n

ug/q ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g

2143-01L-5 0.25 43 .2 <01BL--6 0.0 14a 0.1 67a <0 .02-1-99 <0.002a <0.04a <0.01S-S 1-56 483 1101S-d 1.38 430 <

ni•o•H

I .

•r, Z 3

in U uimg/g ug/g ug/g

J143-01L-!i 20.8 2.8 <1DIBITS 100.0 3.55 <102-J-99 0.544a c c

01S--5 15.8 17.0 <101S--6 108 4.3 <1

1002a 0.02a <0

194 1409a 1,04a 0

.6 2161 1210

WlrHoC

C.

IX

ug/g

18.0

68.85<0.002a

253.26108.91

769 2

*4J•rH

>

• H4J(J

10

sleeYOB

c

YeaYes

.01 255 <10 <0.25

.74a 4.2a 10.0 0.022a

.37a <0.1a <10 <0.002a

.18 3392 30 .0 <0.25

.35 4273 10.0 <0.25

V

•HtJO10o ^•H O

•o -12 0

u

NO Dlack

No Black w/lt. greenNo ColorlessNo BrownNo Black & Brown

tT" 3< U S

ug/g ug/g _ug/a

<2 75.711. 9b 0.708° 35.5b <0.04a <02.2 1143

<2 955

rH

O 0•H 01 OUl 4J t->, n)x: 4J uB, Ul 10

Liquid

Liquid & SolidLiquidSolidLiquid & Solid

338.22a

.04a

207262

a

56666

S

_ ug/g

231710.0*

<0.02a

49264 1 3 5

0•H >,4-1 *-»• H -HU >01 10O. I-1l/l (J

1. 151.040.991.271. 12

r-4

ug/g ug/g

2.0 51<1.2b 18. 4a

<1.2b 0.21a

2.85 9632.6 200

j= -ptn c10 'Hr-l O

No FlashNo FlashNo FlashNo FlashNo Flash

flZ

ug/g

<10056. 3a

0.61a

4809917

rH

10 Ul4J TlO -H

* *

91 .7264.43

0.0264.5260.40

£

ug/g

46.84.44a

<0.02a

238158

•0 -0

« "C ig

tl in « «iU) T3 Ul TJ3 .H -H -HUl rH Q rH

* U) * Ul

d dd dc cd dd d

o.ug/g

286577

<0.01a

1410

1 181

P..Q)

rH

Afl

G

Cu

NONo

YesNoNo

a10

ug/g

< 2 . 2

96b

<2.2b

25 .514.0

f^.

IrHCu

£J

10 V01 >1 8UlC Q.(0 EO «

dd

N/Add

2143-011-5OIBL..6

02-1-9901S-I5OlS-ij

U 310 rH

0) <0X >

BtU/lb

1609312862

NA8276

10883

Ul0) 0)

n 103 SrH

0 CU) rH

NONo

YesNo

No

0)rHU•H

U N10 -H0. U)

dd

N/Add

R

,jjj

*

1.3S

3.1!

<0.0133.3625.94

UlrH C10 01*J m0 0H rH

fl•> X

as Cl

0. 160.23

<5a

0.70

0.45

00

1

0

3

H3UJ

*

. 19

. 16<5a

. 16

.49

01o*0U44J•HZ

*

1.831.30

<5a

0.610.90

O(N

X

f

1.9262.94100.028. 1237.65

inrH•HO

*

43.663.7

c

28.3

39.3

Ul0>

10JS

*

0.80

16.3c

9.B

11.5

•orH

Oin

*

99.2

83.7c

90.2

88.5

LOG 01 - Sample Location Explanations

#2143-01L-5 - Grab Sample Dipped 9 LOG Ol-L-5.

#2143-01BL-6 - Composite of LOG #01-BS-1 (0-5.5')#01-BS-2 (0-5')#01-BS-3 (0-21)

#2143-OlL-99 - Blank (Distilled Water)Processed Near Location 01L-6

#2143-015-5 - Composite of LOG #01-DB-4 (5.5-6.5')#01-1-1 (6-91)

#2143-015-6 - Composite of LOG I01-BS-1 (5.5-5.81)#01-BS-2 (5-6' )tOl-BS-3 (2-31)

MOTES:A Resulcsi in mg/1'J Resulti i in ug/1(; I n s u f f i c i e n t sampled Nature of sample prohibited analysisN/A - Not Analyze,!

LIQUIDS

2 of 8

EP Toxicity

BOM IN

(1)

BOftIN*

(t)(»)

Ot-l02-tOt-l

(4)Ot-l02-202-S02-102-tOt-B02-102-t02- J

SAMPLE

U2S3-4

SAMPLE

02S1-402S2-40201-10201-20201-302-1-990202-10202-20202-30203-10203-20203-30204-1(I2D4-20204-3

0251-402S2-40201-102D1-202D1-31)2-1-991)202-10202-2D2D2-302D3-10203-20203-30204-10204-20204-3

-*!*

Z f

0.0250.012

<:0.002•:0.002<:o.oo2•CO. 0020 . 009

•10.01)2•CO. 002•CO. 002

O.OD3•CO. 002

0.022CO. 00 2•(0.002

j.a

117876676

121061

127

a _*at_

2Bq/l

<0.04<0.040.2500.4920.302<0.04<0.040.1270.1720.4380.3470.536<0.040.2730.131

rH Va <tu•H V b.n 4J£ 3 oe, <n r-

SolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolid

3: "q/l

•ou•g/i

0.1200.127

<0.010<0.010

0.010<0.0100.038

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010

0.091<0.01<0.01

(J£ >•-H 'Hu >V 10O« M(/> o

1.311.40.41.24.67.71.41.78.69.77.48

1.771.081.371.44

6 £mq/1 uq/1

M tru in»q/i uq/i

9.19 0.914.03 0.60

<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0 .20.45 <0.2

<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2

2.60 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2

JC *>

10 >H•H OIn O.

•c

No FlashNo FlashNo PlashNo PlashNo PlashNo PlashNo FlashNo PlashNo PlashNo PlashNo PlashNo FlashNo FlashNo PlashNo Flash

£ « tr 9 -H c< U Z Nq/1 uq/1 Kg/1 »q/l »q/l

EP Toxicity

XIa,"q/l

1.521.96

<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10

1.670.203<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.10

1.67<0.01<0.01

in>HO

*

58.2538.80.65

1.4<0.5<0.515.85.458.70.5

54.110.0335.52.0

3.26

«.mq/1

<0.002<0,002

0.0020.003

<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002

0.0040.004

<0.002<0.002

O.OOS<0.002

MV4Ja3*

7.041.00

17.8714. 1411.600.01

20.2610.5516.1632.5720.7218.7019.4526.83

13.2

o> P< U

uq/1 mq/1

2.40 6.994.38 4.601.51 <0.041.51 0.1581.62 <0.041.25 <0.040.95 0.3761.23 <0.040.98 <0.041.14 0.0881.36 <0.041.33 <0.040.02 1.83

0.037 0.066<0.02 <0.04

|A•3.HrH

rt

If

92.9699.0082.1385.8688.4099.9979.7489.4583.8467.4379.2881.3080.5573.2386.80

•HZ

mq/1

3.822.88

0. 1380.0850.092<0.04

1.060.1730.1430.0890.1460.114

2.62<0.040.134

vOrHoi-H

nCU

ug/g

( i )

(Z)

(3)

(4)

3M

M je P uO^ i 3.g ?

^ H K O O S Z r H O OH U H P a U t n u . O

ug/1 »q/l ug/q uq/q uq/q »C »q/kq

642 56

5 £mq/1 uq/1

64.0 46.3692.5 60.0

0.409 16.490.973 11.580.226 5.36<0.04 4.15

20.3 42.33.09 19.21.13 8.6

0.058 11.91.24 15.6

0.604 4.663.6 29.70.02 8.8

0.597 3.5

r-t nIN nIN IN

a ao. a.

ug/g ug/g

M

Uuq/I

30302010<3102510<325IS19

402025

IN

r^,_<

0)&

ug/g

Bottom Sludge/ChemI ?)LOC #02-1-4

Composite of SI

Composite of S2

Depth

Depth

10 0 <0.25 No Flash 61

>.v>•H

tl III >•0 •* -rt•H 0 W

i 1-1 C O1 r-t » «Z s £ au in o. K

uq/q uq/q viq/q

33.5 <1 55.60 Yes3.00 <1 10.32 Yes2.15 21.3 <0.04 Ye*2.10 13.9 0.416 Yes1.15 <1.0 0.27 Yes

<0.25 <1 <0.04 No0.50 4.0 49.98 Yes1.10 13.06 0.66 Yes3.20 3.3 3.51 Yes0.95 28.7 5.82 Yes1.00 <1 4.38 Ye*3.00 10.6 6.49 Ye*0.25 <1 6.61 Yes2.80 <1 3.22 Yes4.90 7.9 0.99 Yes

iCD •* O

<N IN INr-t l-t f-t

m m aa. a. a.

uq/q uq/q uq/q

or Soil Mater ia l From (14.

( L i q u i d ) LOG #02-1-3 (0 -5 1

#02-1-4 (0-5 1

#02-1-5 (0 -5 '

( S l u d g e ) LOC #02-1-3 (5-11#02-1-4 (5 -7 .#02-1-5 ( 5 - 9 1

iR

ad

ioacti

vit

y

u 1

NoNoNoNONONoNoNoNoNoNONoNoNoNo

uU)

go(h

1a•q/g

Co

lor

BlackBlackBrownBrownBrownWhite

Blk/BrnBrown

Ok BrnBrownBrown

Dk BrnBlack

GrayBrown

5 To 15' )

|

• )5' ))

Soil (Silica Sand) Processed @ LOC 02-1

NOTBi Int • Interference• - Insufficient sample quantitya > See attached tables

SKIMMER LAGOON3 of 8

BOftlNf SAMPLE

09-4 03DTA-4

2mq/1

S T) k.u u

mq/1 ag/1 »g,

EP Toxicity

i » XJ Vl X O. (/>

/I ug/1 mq/1 mq/1

O- 3 -rlrt U Zug/1 mq/1 mq/1

Smq/1

M>

rH LlH U

Vlq/1 mq/1

2 Hp, P auq/q uq/q

2236 49100 7

1zu

_ug/g

9.25

£ *Jn CID .rlrt Ob. 0.

•C

No Flash

Cauin

H«\

8•g/kq

12.93

auin

s«8

•q/q

16.4

EP Toxicity

BONN*

09-109-09-09-09-09-09-09-4

09-409-4

(1)

SAMPLE

03D1-10301-20301-40301-503DZ-10302-20302-30302-40303-403D4-403-4-99

0301-10301-203D1-403D1-50302-10302-20302-303I32-403D3-40 304-403-4-99

3. s-fjidi "q/1

0.004 0.2020.003 0.2130.004 0.5770.004 0.5290.003 0.947

<0.002 0.940<C.002 0.393<C.002 0.664(i. 004 1.14

<('.002 0.732<(l.002 0.198

rt 4J

« *U>H V U.in u>, 4 •

:E f a oa a. in r-

7 SolidB Solid7 Solid9 LiqtSol7 LiqtBol7 LiqtSol6 Solid6 Solid6 Solid6 Solid6 Solid

smq/1

<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01

0.22

<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01

o•H >,<u *>•H .0 >V 1

ft 5

.29

.17

.28

.42

.74

.83

.79

.671.57

1.44

1.69

ki o-U K

"»g/i ug/i

<0.04 <0.2<0.04 0.4<0.04 0.34<0.04 <0.2

0.12 0.20

<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2<0.04 <0.2

£ W10 Cn <H

C r S•C

Mo FlashMo FlashNo FlashNo Flash

27»CNo FlashNo FlashNo FlashNo FlashNo FlashNo Flash

X)cu

mq/l

<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01

4.37

<0.011.14

<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01

mr-i•HO

*

17.5

3719.6

24.0

12.1

13.9

<0.5

2.34

2.03.63

<0.5

«mg/1

<0.002<0.002

0.0040.006

<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002

LIV4J«3

*

20.3

11.9

9.623.9617.70

10.8

20.2835.9015.7615.6613.65

o< ?< uuq/1 mg/1

<0.02 <0.04<0.02 0.0590.021 0.153<0.02 <0.04<0.02 0.179<0.02 <0.04<0.02 <0.04<0.02 <0.04<0.02 <0.040.024 0.156<0.02 <0.04

wT)•HrH

&

*

79.7088.10

90.4

76.0482.30

89.2

79.7264. 1084.2484.3486.35

'Hz

»q/l

0.7942.35

0.7550.5370.4630.4080.2220.316<0.040.142<0.04

vD(HO»-(

0

Kuq/q

5 Hmq/1 ug/1

9.90 1.738.4 2.227.6 2.02.34 1.7

136 1.51.52 <1.22.27 <1.2

1 . 26 < 1 . 26.98 <1.2

5.46 <1.2

0.148 <1.2

rH (NIS ^IN <N•-t "1

at ok! U

uq/q uq/q

M

>

Uuuq/i

10Int

35184520191820429

r+*t1N,-»

0

Uug/g

iztj

uq/q .17.20

2.65

7.45

0.60.41.2

<0.25<0.25

0.70.9

<0.25

CDr

INi-<

0

k!uq/q

Su

lf id

«

uq/g

60.0<1

50.816.0

<123.2

<12.66

<1<1<1

^i/ifS^^

09

U

ug/

o

1CL,

uq/q

53.8852.9441.35

166. 1678. »866.46

0.10

5.46

8.60

2.58

0.21

X

uu10

a

YesYesYesYe»YesYesYesYesYesYesYes

fNi-*

O

V.uq/q

uflo n•- o•C -H4 o3. o

No BlackNo Dk BrnNo Brn/B.lkNo BlackNo BrownNo Dk BrnNo BrownNo BrownNo Dk BrnNo BrownNo White

(I) Soil Blank (Silica Sand) Processed 9 LOG 03-4.

HOT!I Int. • Interference• " Innufflclent sample quantity6 » See attached tables

SOUTH POND4 of 8

EP Toxicity 0)in

s LIU

BOWNO SAMPLE •g/l »q/i04-4 0401-4-104-5 04D1-5-104-6 04D1-6-104-7 04D1-7-1

0.002<0.0020.014

0.2430.7000.348

<0.020.027<0.02

<0.04<0.04<0 04

$ & xuq/1 aq/l mq/l

3ug/1 ng/1 «g/l »q/l

H oug/i »qA

0.27<0.2<0.2

0.171

<0. 1

<0.002 1.0<0.002 <0.450.003 0.7

<0.04<0.04<0.04

0.4250.1340.107

29. 1

5.251.4B 11.5

48.016.020.0

1068

2042480

39500915055003020

666

10

n c(0 ~HX Uo p sp fi o,

ug/g ug/g ug/q .*CU

4.1 No0.40 No Plash

<0.25 No Plash1.4 No Plash

i iu yo o

»9/k9 »9/9

239.84.41316.00862.5

1.2<0.2S<0.25

23.9

EP Toxicity

SAMPLE «g/I5 XI

On•g/l mq/l uq/l mq/1 uq/i

2U2 N h> U

•q/1 HI g/l ug/1 uq/1 ug/q ug/q ug/q

>.4>

U

I

04-404- •04-«04-7

(1)(C)

0401-404D1-504D1-604D1-704D1-119401-12

0.004•••

0.0040.005

0.438

*••

0.8110.610

<0.01•t•

0.0350.037

<0.04

**•

<0.04<0.04

0.40»

••

1.251.07

0.490

*•

*<0.10<0.10

<0.002 0.468• •

* •* t

0.003 1.258<0.002 0.847

<0.04•••

0.117<0.04

0.258

**•

0.1310.188

16.60••

*2.8745.752

12.07 13.0• •

• *• »

28.20 Int20.37 Int

5

1.250.500.25

•1.5

3.45

7.1248

47.0•

23.7<1 .0

29.94059.58464.2490.2990.3120.540

YasYasYas

•YasYas

NoNoNoMoNoNo

BlackBrownBlack

•'BrownBrown

Xa.

*H 4J1 »u

•H tl U.« v>• a •e. w oQ. V) r~

u•H >,

OVa

0401-404D1-S0401-604D1-704D1-VI0401-i:t

777«r

67

SolidSolidSolid

•SolidSolid

1.691.461.721.701.291.85

£ 4Jvi c-« ou. o.

•3

No PlashNo PlashNo Flash

*No FlashNo Flash

1.11.2

$

14.4012.30

11.7

16.10

85.6087.7095.4565.0288.3

83.90

paX

s(N

ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/q uq/q uq/9

<0.25S<25.5<25.5

<0.255<2S.S<6.38

<0.368<36.8<36.8

<0.368<36.8<9.20

<0.250<2S.O<25.0

<0.2SO<25.0<6.2S

<0.240<24.0<24.0

6.56

<24.0<6.00

<0.347<34.7<34.7

<0.347<34.7<8.68

9.56

<48.1<48.1

<0.481<48.1

<12.03

(1) Composite of 04D1-1, 04D1-2 & 04D1-3

(2) Composite of 0 4 D 1 - 7 A , 04D1-8, 04D1-9 & 04D1-10

NOTEt Int • Intarfarence• - I n s u f f L c l a n t sampla quantity

A • See attached tables

SOIL/CRUSHED DRUM BERM5 of 8

EP Toxlclty£

PORIN8

06-I

OS-I

OB-I

OB-I

(I)

8AMM.E

0501-1OSD2-I05O2-.705D3-105SS-&

2.JsaZl0.003

<<D.002<0.002<0.002

0.005

&«q/l

<0.040.5180.5470.8760.104

•oo•q/1

<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01

Mumq/1

0.193<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04

D<X

uq/1

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

6.910.22

Smg/l

1.47

0.1180.208

<0.10.714

«Hiq/1

<0.002<0.002<0.0020.009

<0.002

Suq/l

<0.02<0.45

0.45

15.0<0.45

3mq/1

0.279<0.04<0.040.088<0.04

•H•K

mg/l

0.09

<0.04<0.040.0890.049

Smg/l

4.42

0.023<0.020.6380.835

f-4H

ug/1

12.3

4.2<1 .22.2

6.25

M

MU

ug/1

20261910

8.0

z<•> _ . .

« 5a 8fH u

& £

>•HUUa& R

adio

ac

uq/q ug/g _ug/g

<0.2S1.55

<0.251.55

0.65

<1 3.80

<1 0.187<1 0.91

<1 4.76

* 4.445

NoYes

NoYesYes

NoNONONONo

uO

rH

5

BlackGrayGray

Ok BrrDk Brt

OSDt-1

05D2-1

0502-20503-105SS--6-

2131312*

-o a

SolidSolidSolidSolidSolid

O

w*

0.991.411.421.66

*

C. ug c-< oin n,

Ho Maah

No PlashNo FlashNo Flash

26.1<0.5< O . S0.7640.4

83.1066.9782. 1077.9084. 10

\DrHOfH

m«

uq/g

<0.405<0.081<0.081<O.QB1<0.223

.H<NMfH

nU

uq/g

<0.625<0.125<0. 125<0.125<0.255

(MrnIN»H

aK

ug/q

<0.86<0.172<0.172<0.172<0.368

fM*rPMr-4

ffl

id

ug/g

6.75

<0.132<0.1320.800

<0.250

o>**IN-1

o!ug/g

<0.66<0.132<0.132<0.132<0.240

<»mnMaK

uq/q

<0.96<0.192<0. 192<0.192<0.347

oVOM.H

0)oo.

uq/q

2.90

<0.185<0.18S0.32713.6

(I) Soil Composite of 5 Su r f ace Soil Pointsin LOG #5 - C o n t a m i n a t e d Soil A r e a .

HOTKt int - Interference'' • Insufficient sample quantity

CONTAMINATED SOIL AREA6 of £

BOftINQ

(1)0«-lOS -206-10»-20«-»0«-loe-2

SAMPLI:

06-2-990601- 1060 1-20602-10602-2 .0602-40603-106D3-S

3.mq/l

<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.0020.0030.004

<0.002<0.002

2Pq/l

0.1480.6500.5660.3390.3700.603

1.940.277

smq/l

<0.020.1970.0220.027<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02

uu

<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.040.4910.120

uq/1

<0.20.51<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

m ^ l

0.3410.6230.993

<0. 10.3550.6310.720

<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.002

u ? l

0.8<0.45<0.45<0.4S<0.45

0.50.70.5

u

<0.040.95

<0.040.078<0.04<0.04<0.04<0.04

• H

mq/l

<0.040.6110.3766.43

0.9960.703<0.040.560

0.07610.49.847.6113.624.8

0.04223.1

M

H Uuq/1 ug/1

<1.2 10<1.2 3<1 .2 5<1.2 10< 1 . 2 28<1.2 10<1.2 37<1 .2 80

I

U

<0.2S0.8

0.7522.00<0.25

0.251.76.8

V VI i»TJ )•* »H

£ g tJy c, *

uq/q ug/g

<1 4.53 No<1 0.66 No<1 15.88 Y«a<1 49.08 Y«S<1 101.79 Y«S<1 67.35 Y.a<1 5.05 Y»s

<1.0 100.92 Yes

Rid

ioac

NoNoNoNONoNoNONo

Co

lor

WhiteMd BrnDk BrnDk Brn

BlackBlackBlack

. Dk Brn

06-2-9'J0601-10601-20602-10602-20602-40603- 106D3-2

Xa

676

1277

137

>~t +J Cat aU *•3 u '[>. <o • <£ « O Co, <o r- v

SolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolidSolid

Gra

vit

y

.70

.40

.40

.36

.54

.541.291.44

w ca <HM OU, Q,

•c

No FlashNo FlashNo Flash

29»CNo Flash

48»C35»C29«C

in•HO

<0.5<0.59.3

1627.728.41.5257.7

M914Jfl3

f

0.0012.9015.3011.005.68

12.9015.1013.00

in•o• H1-4

&

f

100.0087. 1084.7089.0094.3287.1084.9087.00

0

m

—

<0.081<0.40S<0.405<0.405<0.405<0.405<0.405

r*4t-4

COuCu

—

3.24<0.625<0.625<0.625<0.625<0.625<0.625

<N

mk!

ug/g

^

<0 .172<0.86<0.86<0.86<0.86<0.86<0.86

m

ug/g

^

1.2820.224.157.043.22.5545.4

m

ug/g_

<0. 132<0.66<0.66<0.66<0.66<0.66<0.66

fN

OQ

ug/g—

<0.192<0.96<0.96<0.96<0.96<0.96<0.96

(Nr-4

ffiOo.

uq/q

»

1.535.0511.311.88.25

<0.92510.1

(I) Soil Bank (Silica S a n d ) Processed 0 LOC 06-2

NOTIi Int • Intsrfurence• • I n s u f f l c i a n t sampla quantity

FILLED IN AREA

7 of 8

EP Toxicity •sHIjra.

u<0

8.

(I)(8)

OT-I

0701-30702-30703-1

<0.0020.0030.002

O.S720.7690.547

<0.02<0.02<0.02

<0.04<0.04<0.04

<0.2<0.2<0.2

0.4690.391

<0.002<0.002C0.002

o.s0.5

<0.45

<0.04 0.124<0.04 0.598<0.04 0.637

3.2511.515.7

202828

uq/q uq/q0u

1.652.7

14.65.066.4

0.4585.4092.64

Ye«Ye«

No BrownHo Dk BrnNo Dk Brn

07D1-307D2-307D3-1

S.676

Ph

ysi

cal

Sta

te

at

70*

F

f ty

Spe

c

Gra

v

c. u3.5ZS,•c

Solid 1.58Solid 1.74Solid 1.59

Ho Flash27'C

25.5»C

1.1416.029.0

ter

10•-*o

13.9014.0014. 10

uq/q<0.081<0.405<0.405

COa CQa nuo.

ug/g ug/q uq/q ug/q ug/g

3.90 <0.172<0.625 <0.86<0.625 <0.86

1.40 <0.132 <0.192 2.238.60 <0.66 <0.96 4.309.30 <0.66 <0.96 2.97

(I) Composite of LOG 07-1 (Dl) (0-3.5')07-2 (Dl) (0-4')

(Z) Composite of LOC 07-1 (D2) (3.5-10')07-2 (D2) (4-8.5')

NOTEi Int • Interference* - Insufficient sample quantity

SEEPAGE AREA8 of 8

*>./)Cli«nt 3015

ANALYTICAL KCSULTC

Data

Instrument:5985 #1

sitelab no.frn no.analysis dateanalysis timeanalyst initials

IV •en>l«in 100rv Acrylonitrilc looIV b«nc«n« 10IV,V broaofoz* 20IV oarbon t«tr« chloride m

TV eMoroben»«n« 10BV chlorodihronoaithJU* lo9V chloro»th*ne 3010V 2-chloro«thylvinyl «ther ^Q11V chloroform 1012V dichlorobroaoBethainc 901 3V.4V ,1-dichloroe thane 20.5V ,2-dichloroethane 20.6V ,1-dichloroethylene 20.TV ,2-dichloropropane 20•V , 3-dichloropropylene 109V ethylbenrene 10

•0V aw thy 1 breed de ' 30IV Mthyl chloride 102V »ethylene chloride , IQ3V 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 104V tetrachloroetbylene 105V toluene 106V 1,2-trftnc-dichloroethylene 20TV l,l,l-trichloroeth«ne 208V l,1.2-trichloro«th*n« 209V trichloro«thyl«ne 103V trichlorofluoronwth*n« 50IV vinyl chloride 30

Volume purged

Spike level

4«-l,2-dichloroe thane

de-tolueneP-BFB

I

////////

////////

////////

ACROUtACKYLOC6H6

CHBR3CCL4CLC6H5DBRCIXC2H5CL2CLEVECHCL3BRDCIJ4

11DCLE12DCLE11DCE12DCLP13DCPETC6H5CH3BRCH3CLCH2CL2TCLEATCLEEMEC6H5T12DCE111TCE112TCETRCLECCL3F •C2H3CL

01S-581580

297339/23ib:4U

JDH

33

68

18

122

OlBL-681581

297349/23lb:4b

JDH

31

3093

98

1351

56166

215

270470

293

-0.5 o 0.5 gw/Ttr w/TG

VOA SURROGATES

02-1-9981582

297249/21

:45

BAK

3

1

2

38

1473

01S-581583

297279/2114:30

BAK

1800

5400013000

84800

31800

01S-681584

279319/2312 : 3"b'

JW

2000

10000

40300

340023700

6000

5000

LabBlank"

297309/23lU:lb

JW

2

1539

2

LabBlank297209/21/.:isuBAK

5

5 ml 0.005 g O .OObg S ml £ nuNo TG w/TG w/TG w/TG No TG

TG=tetraglyme

50 Units ug/1 in water

12DCD4

MEC5D8PBFB

15

4036

41

4159

45

4945

27

4837

J

47

3749

1

64

3358

46

4443

1 1

NOTE: All results reported in ug/l_21 'unless otherwise notedWhere no value appears, the compound was not detected.

ANALYTICAL

./gli«at 3015 Pat*

(VGA) Instrument: 5985 #1

_of


IV •croltia 100rv acxylonitrll* 100tv b*nc«a« 10IV,V feroMofoni 20iV <wrbon t«tr«chlorl4« -^nrv chlorob«nMn« 10rv c&lorodlbroaoMt*t«A* 10IV chloro*thkn« 300V 2-chloro«thylvlnyl «th«r 20

11V chloroform 101 TV dichlorobroaK30Kth«nt 20IJV14V l,l-dichloro«th»n« 20ISV l,2-dichloro»thAn« 20t6V l,l-dichloro*thyl«n« 2017V l,2-dichloroprop*n« 20IfV 2,3~dichloroprppyl«n« 10i9V «thylb«ntene 10tOV vethyl broaid> ' 30tiv methyl chloride 10>2V methylene chloride . JQ!3V l,1.2,2-tetr«chloroeth*ne 10>4V tctr«chloroetbyl«ne 10•SV toluene ^0*6V l,2-tr*n«-dichloroethylene 20TV 1.1,1-trichloroe thane 206V l,1.2-trichloroeth»ne 20*V trichloroethylene 100V txichlorofluoromethtne 50IV vinyl chloride 30

////////

////////

////////

ACROLN

ACRYLO

C6H6

£HEa2_OCL4CLC6H5

DBRCLMC2H5CL2CLEVECHCL3BRDCLM

11DCLE12DCLE11DCE12DCLP13DCPETC6H5CH3BRCH3CLCH2CL2TCLEATCLEEMEC6H5T12DCE111TCE112TCETRCLECCL3F •C2H3CL

LabBlank

297269/21JJ:4U

BAK

7 l

120

25

>4b«

385

-

•

5 mis

VGA SURROGATES

Spike level 50 Units ug/1

d^-l , 2-dichloroe thanede-tolueneP-BFB

12DCD4

MEC5D8PBFB

63

4141

—

i

•

.

— • • ""

__^.

NOTE: All" results reported in ug/i or ug/£gi«,gc otherwise noted.va q not detected.

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE FRACTION VGA INSTRUMENT 5985 fl

SAMPLE

81i>80/ 015-5

Lab Blank

81581/01BL-6

81582/02-1-99

81583/ 01S-5

Lab Blank.

(w/tetraglyrae )

FRN NO.

29733

29730

29734

29724

29727

29726

DATEANALYZED/ INITIALS

9/23 JDH

9/23 JW

9/23 JDH

9/21 BAK\

9/21 BAK

9/21 BAK

PEAK NO.

l2

1

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

2

3

4

1

2

1

2

RT(mln)

28.1

28.8

16.5

33.0

9.7

28.0

28.8

30.2

33.0

34.0

16.4

28.0

28.8

32.8

28.0

28.9

28.0

28.8

CAS NO.

•

IDENTIFICATION OF BEST MATCH

Xylene (two separate isomers)

Xylene

Hexane

dA-dichlorobenzene

1,1, 2-trichloro-l , 2 , 2-trif luoroethane (f reon)

Xylene

Xylene

Propylbenzene

Ethylmethyl benzene

Ethylmethyl benzene

Hexane

Xylene

Xylene

d^-dichlorobenzene

Xylene

Xylene

Xylene

Xylene

CONCENTRATION(jig/L or jig/g )

\ 139 ug/kg;12 ug/1

92 ug/1

470 ug/kg

'I 7450 ug/kg

J

380 ugAg

•^ 2090 ugAg

4 ug/1

f 14 ug/1

6 ug/1

88600 ug/kT

31400 ug/kg

732 ug/1

673 ug/1

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO. SAMPLE TYPE FRACTION VOA INSTRUMENT 5985 ffl

SAMPLE

81584/ G1S-I)

FRN NO.

29731


9/23 JW

PEAK NO.

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

(mln)

5.0

5.9

11.6

16.6

28.1

28.9

30.3

33.1

34.2

CAS Mo. IDENTIFICATION OF BEST MATCH

Acetone

Carbon disulflde

1,4-dioxane

Hexane

Xylene

Xylene

ProDvl benzene

Methyl ethylbenzene

Methyl ethvlbenzene

CONCENTRATION(jig/Lor pg/g)

17000 ug/kq

12000 ug/Xg

18000 ugAg

3870 ugAg

\ 59000 ugAgJ

7800 ugAg

9170 ugAg

9810 uciAg

ANALYTICAL Instrument: _5996_

Project •D./ni«Dt_ 3015 Waters

site ~lab no.frn no.analysis dateanalysis timeanalyst initials

IB acenaphth«ne ANAPNE21 «c«naphthyltn« ANAPXL3B •nthrae«n«* ANTKC4B bentidiM BENZIDSB b*n*o(«)anthrae«n«« HAANTK6B b«n*o7*Tpyr*m 6APYK7B J.4-b*ntozluoranthtr** J4BTAN•B b«n*o(ghi)i»ryltM BRHTPY

////////////////////////

ISO100100700100600200300

9B b*nco(k)fluor»nth«M* BKFANT 20010B bit(2-ehl6ro«thoxy)MthAM B^CEXM^CTO11B bit (2-cMoro«thyl)tth«r B2CLEE ISO12B bit (2>cMoroi»opropyl)«th«rB2CIP£i501JB bi«(2-»thylh«j(yl)phthal«t« B2EHP 15014B 4-bro»oph«nyl phcnyl otter 4BRPPE350

15B butyl benzyl phth«l*teBBZP16B 2-chloronaphth«lene 2CNAP

1505nn

17B 4-chlorophenyl phcnyl ether 4CLPPEi5QL6B chrysene4 (see SB) CHRY19B dlbenzo(a,h) anthracene DBAHA20B 1,2-dichlorobenzene 12DCLB21B 1,3-dichlorobenzene 13DCLB22B 1,4-dichlorobenzene 14DCLB23B 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine 33CL2B24B die thy 1 phthalate DEP25B dimethyl phthalate Dj^p26B di-n-butyl phthalate DNBP27B 2,4-dinitrotoluene 24DNT28B 2,6-dinitrotoluene 2iDNT29B di-n-octyl phthalate DNnP30B 1,2-diphenylhydrazine 12DPH

(as azobenzene)31B fluoranthene TANT32B fluorene P1.RENE33B hexachlorobenzene CL6BZ34 B hexachlorobutadiene HC3D

100Tin

L 200200?nn?nn150200100350finnion150

100i sn350BOO

3SB hexaehlorocyclopentadiene CL6CP BOO36B hexachloroethane CL6ET37B indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrenejQppY£36B isophorone ISOPHR39B naphthalene NAP40B nitrobenzene JIB41B N-nitrosodimethylamineNDMA42B N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine NPNP43B N-nitrosodiphenylamineNNDPA44B phenanthrene* (see 3B)pHftNTR4 5B pyrene PVR46B 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene j23i>cB

soo300100inn?no150

A 200350100TOOinn

01BL-681581A348711/801 :12

LMC

60

13

6

14

4634124

59RO113

24

9

02-1-9981582A345611/122:24

LMC

20

7]f,

5

BNA SURROGATES

MB4067A345811/200:11

LMC

2?q

1

6

I

.

Spike level 100 or 200 Units ua/i

ds-nitrobenzene KBD52 f luorobiphenyl TIOBPdB-naphthaiene NAPD8

ND

182im

60

45

41

4175

NOTE: All results reported in "9/1 unless otherwise noted.Where no value appears, the compound was not detected.

JMULYTICAL SULIS Instrument: 5996

rro>rt »o./tlt»Pt 3015 Waters


ACID COMPOUNDS

LA l-cMoroph«nol 2CLPtA 2,4-dlcMorophtnol 24DCLPIA J,4-di»«thylph«nol 24DMP1-IA 4,6-diMtxe-o-crtBol 46DN2CA 2,4-diniU-ophfnol 24DNP

iA 2-nltrophtnol 2NP7A 4-nitroph«nol 4NP•A p-chloro-»-ert»ol 4CL3C9A p«nt«chloroph*nol PCP

OA fhtnol PHENOI11A 2,4.t-trichloroph«nol 246TCF

////////////////////////

200300400700700400350400350150800

01BL-681581A348711/8Ul:l^

LMC

^bJ

1430

02-1-9981582A345611/1li: 24

LMC

77

ACID SUPJIOGATES

MB4067Ai456

11/2UU : il

LMC

Spike level 100 or 200 Units ug/l

2-F-phenol 2FPphenol-d6 PHENDtoenta-F-phenol err

spike level

PESTICIDES

IP *ldrin ALDRN2P o-BHC ABHC3P C-BHC BBHC4F Y-BHC f l indane) LINSP 6-BHC DBHC6P ehlordane fl.DAN7p 4. 4 '-DDT PPDDT6P 4, 4 '-DDE PPDDE9P 4, 4 '-ODD PPDDD10P dieldrin nr.nRNIIP o-«ndosulfan AFN^T.F12P 8-«ndo»ulf»n BFN^T.F13P cndotulfan fulfat* ESFSO414P «ndrin ENDRN15P cndrin aldehyde ENDALD16P hejstachlor HPCL17F heptmchlor cpoxide HPCI E18P PCB-1242 PCB24219P PCB-1254 PPB2S420P fCB-1221 PCR22121P FCB-1232 prn?T722P PCB-1248 T>rR->HR23P PCB-I260 T>rT.t>An24P PCB-1016 prnn i f i2SP toxaphene TYPHPK

104133203200

1000100010001000100Q

?*> nnn100010001000i nnr50005000500C200C500Ci nori n n r

i n ,oori o nnri n nnri n nnri n^nri n nn ri n , n n r«in nnr

302426100

32

27Ib100

^

NOTE: All results reported in uo/i unless otherwise noted.Where no value appears, the compound was not detected.

MULTTXCJU. uLTS (BNA) Instrument: 5996

rroj«ct 3015 soils


IB acen«pt)th«nt ANAPNE2* «c«naphthyltne ANAPYL3B *nthr«c«n«« ANTRC4B benxidir* BENZ1DSB fe«n*oU)*nthr«c«n«* dAArJTRit btnu>U)pyr«n* BAFYK7» J,4-btn«ofluoranth«i*» JJBTA'NU benuXghDptryl.!* pfiHTPY

////////////////////////_

150100100700100600200300

9B b«n«o(k)fluoranthtn«« BKFANT 20010B bit(2-cMoro«thoxy)sttth*n* B2CEXM20011B bis(2-efclorotthyl)»th«rB2CLEE 15012B bis (2-chloroisopropyl)«tJ»«rB2CIPEl5013B bis(2-«thylh«jcyl)pnthalat« B2EHP 15014B 4-broaophtnyl phenyl «th«r 4BRPPE350

15B butyl benzyl phth«l«t«BBZP16B 2-chloronaphthalene 2CNAP

1502nn

17B 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4CLPPE15DIBB chrysene« (see SB) CHRY19B dibenzo(».h)»nthr«c«neDBAHAJOB 1,2-dichlorobenzene 12DCLB21B 1,3-dichlorobenzene HDCLB22B i,4-dichlorobenzene 14DCLB23B 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine 33CL2B24B diethyl phthalate DEP25B dimethyl phthalate DMP26B di-n-butyl phthalate DNBP27B 2,4-dinitrotoluene 24DNT2BB 2,6-dinitrotoluene 26DNT29B di-n-octyl phthalate DNOP30B 1,2-diphenylhydrazine 12DPH

(as azobenzene)31B fluoranthene FANT32B fluorene FI,T?FNK33B hexachlorobenz«ne CI^GBZ34B hexachlorobutadiene HCBD

1003102002002 noTonISO200100350BOOion150

ionTin350BOO

35B hexachlorocyclopentadiene CL6CP BOO36B hexachloroe thane CL6ET37B indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrenejcDPYR38B isophorone ISOPHR_39B naphthalene NAP40B nitrobenzene NB41B N-nitrosodi»ethylamin«NDMA42E N-nitrosodi-n-propylanine NPMP43B N-nitrosodiphenylaJnineNNDPA44B phenanthrene* (see 3B)pHANTR4 SB pyrene PYR46B 1.2,4-trichlorobenzenei2iTCR

Dilution:

Spike level

ds-nitrobenzene HBD52 f luorobiphenyl F10BPde-naphtnalene NAPD8

500300100ion2nn150

ft 200350100ion?nn

01L-581560A348811/8

02:05LMC

253

57

24

36

182

11

11820

01S-581583A3 46011/201:58LMC

115

32

4

17

2

8?13

159

21

370210

6656

1:10BNA SURROGATES

01S-681584A346111/202:51LMC

119

17

17

2

2137

157

35

229220

927

61

MB4064A3 46;11/203:45LMC

21

116

200 Units ug/g

240326276229

150226187166

196375286199

144201144108

NOTE: All results reported in ug/gWhere no value appears, the compound was not detected.

unless othervise noted.

GC/MS Library Search Data Summary Pog« of

PROJECT NO. J015 SAMPLE TYPE water FRACTION BNA INSTRUMENT 5996

SAMPLE

81581/01BL-6

FRN NO.

A3487

DATEANALYZED/INITIALS

11/8 LMC

PEAK NO.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

RT(m!n)

5.8

6.1

6.1

6.3

6.4

7.0

7.4

8.6

9.3

10.4

10.9

11.4

12.6

12.9

13.1

13.2

13.7

14.5

15.0

15.9

16.1

16.8

17.1

17.4

CAS Mo.

107926

110123

100414

928949

111762

526738

873949

142621

106445

144194

20547993

L112050

85449

334485


butanoic acid

5-methyl-2-hexanone

ethylbenzene

xylene

organic Acid (Ci» or Cs)

2-hexen-l-ol

2-butoxy ethanol

unknown organic acid

1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (or isomer)

3 ,3 ,5-trimethylcyclohexane

hexanoic acid

4-methyl phenol


unknown

2,2, 4-trimethyl-l , 3-pentanediol

2 , 2 ,6-trimethyl-l , 4-cyclohexanediol

unknown


2 , 3-dimethylb3-buten-2- ol

nonanoic acid

1 , 3-isobenzof urandione

unknown

unknown

decanoic acid(continued) ___

CONCENTRATION(jlfl/L ot-p«4-)

110

430

120

770

660

8590

2060

4470

850

1440

8860

979

7340

567

492

176

688

11900

415

4040

370

546

323

1310

GC/MS Library Search Data Summary P0fl« Of

PROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE water FRACTION BNA INSTRUMENT 5996

SAMPLE

81581/01BL-6

(Cont.)

FRN NO.DATE

ANALYZED/INITIALS

PEAK NO.

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

RT(mln)

18.5

19.4

20.5

22.1

23.2

24.9

25.8

27.5

28.2

30.7

CAS No.

-

-

-

544638

629630

57103

629798

57114

124265


unknown

unknown

unknown organic acid (dodecanoic (Ci>)

unknown

tetradecanoic (Cm) acid :

tetradecancnitrile

hexadecanoic (Ci ) acid

hexadecaneni tri le

octadecanoic ( C i f ) acid

octadecanamide

CONCENTRATION

1770

3540

1370

1810

447

435

1190

860

369

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE water FRACTION BNA INSTRUMENT

5996

SAMPLE

81582/02-1-99

MB 4067

FRN NO.

A3456

A3458


11-1-85/U

'

11-1-85 L

PEAK NO.

; 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1C 1

2

3

4

(mln)6.6

7.2

13.6

16.2

16.4

17.0

17.4

18.9

20.6

21.6

23.03

23.2

26.9

31.2

32.0

16.1

17.0

17.4

31.2

CAS No.

— -65850

92313

85449

74367332

74367343

956027

939480

17904277

123795

10546700

92513

74367332

74367343

123795


Xylene (1,4, 1,2 or 1,3)

Xylene - unknown

benzole acid

1,1-bicyclohexyl1 , 3-isobenzof urandione2-methyl-2 , 2 , -dlmethyl-1- ( 2-hydroxy-l-methyl )

ethyl propyl ester of propanoic acid2-methyl-3-hydroxy-2,4,4-trimethyl pentyl ester of

propanoic acid

2-hydroxy benzoic acid hydrazide

unknown

unknown

unknownbenzoic acid, 1 -methyl ethyl ester1-cyclohexene-l-carboxylic acid, 4-(lc5-dimethyl-

3-oxyohexyl)-, methyl esterdioctyl adipate

N-propyl benzamide

1,1-bicyclohexyl

see (t 6 above

see ft 7 above

dioctyl adipate

CONCENTRATION(jtf/b-erpg/g)

2

2

6

3

7

9

e3

8

28

11

6

2374

25

3

7

7

438

JUULYTlCAi

*ro>et 3015 Soils

tULTS

_»at»

Instrument: 5996

Site :

lab no.frn no.analysis dateanalysis timeanalyst initials

ACID COMPOUNDS

LA »-eMoroph«nol 2CLPtA 2,4-diehlorophtnol 24DCLF1A 2,4-di»ethylphtnol 24DMPh

A 4,*-dinitro-o-er««ol 46DN2CA 2.4-dinitrophtnol 24DNPA >nltroph«nol 2NP'A 4-nitrophtnol 4NP

tA p-ehle>ro-»-cr««ol 4CL3CA p*nt*cMoroph*nol POPOA phenol PHENOI1A J,4,i-t.ricMorophenol 246TCJ

Dilution

Spike level

2-F-phenol 2FPphenol-d6 PHEN1Moenta-F-phenol PTP

PESTICIDES

IP aldrin ALDRN2P o-BHC ABHC3P 6-BHC BBHC<F f-BHC ( l indane) LIN5P 6-BHC DBHC6P chlordane CI.nAN7p 4, 4 '-DDT PPDDTep 4. 4 --DDE PPnnr.9P 4 .4- -DDD PPDDn10P dieldrin DT.nRNIIP o-*ndoculf&n AKN^T.r12P fl-«ndosulf«n BENSLF13P «ndo»ulf«n «ulf«te ESFSO414P tndrin ENDRNISP cndrin aldehyde ENDAT.n16P heptachlor HPPT.17p heptachlor epoxide HPPT F18P PCB-1242 PPR54?19P PCB-12S4 PPB7S420P PCB-1221 pm??121P PCB-1232 pru^"»722P PCB-124B prTOJB23P PCB-J260 prB-)<;ft24P PCB-1016 prnrnfi2SP tsxaphene TYPHFN

////////////////////////_

200300400700700400350400350156800

01L-581580

11/802:05LMC

IB

01S-561583

11/201:58LMC

ii j ii ft

Ji

117

ACID SU&i&ATES <^

01S-681584

11/202:51LMC

it)

87

MB4064

11/203:45LMC

i •••u1

1j

I

200 Units ug/g

213254 '172

1000

100010001000100Q

f*\ , nnp10051000

166156 "

97

loonj1 ftofl'soon5onr500C200C50orioori n n r

i n , f t n rI0 ,oori o r o n ri o r n o f ji n ^ o n Hin nnrii n r o o r j^ n ^ n n f j

!

192219216

1

171' 162

76

|

I

"

1 •

i

1 J

NOTE: All results reported in uq/q unless otherwise noted.Where no value appears, the compound was not detected.

CC/MS library Search Data Summarysoil

I SAMPLE ( I MT£ I IFftN MO. /ANAUrZCDJ PEAK MO. I

f/HW'TiALS / /PEAK MO. I . RT CAS Mo. OF BEST MATCH {CONCENTRATION

3."

5. *

/ i /1 <7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

2425

-f. 4

19.7

19.0

19.1

20.4

20.6

21.4

21.7

22.1

22.2

23.2

22.5

23.6

24.7

24.9

25.0

25.9

26.1

21.5

28.228.4

" — "VX.* [ :rurMnc-i.r *d.a ^ jc

II2379 | orwJ'-canoic acid fCj j ) | JJ

2244077 jundecanenltrile | 61

1560958 | 2-methyltetradecane j 24

143077

55045084

638539

-

544638

629630

57103

629629

57114

dodecanoic acid (da)

2-methyl-6-propyl-dodecane

hydrocarbon

tridecanoic acid (013)

hydrocarbon

hydrocarbon

tetradecanoic acid (C1H)

phenanthrene + hydrocarbon

hydrocarbon

unknown amide

hydrocarbon

tetradecanenitrile

hexadecanoic acid

pentadecane

hexadecanenitrile or heptadecanenitrile

octadecanoic acid

unknown amide

455

36

16

23

195

35

229

180

39

59

61

366

369

45

799

23597

GC/MS Library Search Data Summary Pog« of

PROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE Soil FRACTION BNA INSTRUMENT 5996

SAMPLE

81580 (Cent.)

FRN NO.DATE

ANALYZED/INITIALS

"

PEAK NO.

26

27

28

RT(min)30.7

35.06

35.8

CAS No.

124265

3722529


Octadecanamide

Unknown

9-H-Xanthen-9-one , 3-tnethoxy

CONCENTRATION

179

148

68

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE Soil FRACTION UNA INSTRUMENT

SAMPLE

81583/01S-5

FRN NO.

A3 460


11/2 LMC

PEAK NO.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

RT(mln)

17.8

18.0

18.3

18.6

18.8

19.1

19.4

19.5

21.0

21.8

22.2

22.6

22.6

22.9

24.1

25.0

25.3

25.4

26.5

26.5

27.7

27.9

28.8

30.7

CAS No. IDENTIFICATION OF BEST MATCH

Unknown hydrocarbon

Dimethyl naphthalene isomer

Dimethyl naphthalene isomer

Dimethyl naphthlanee isomer

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown Alkene

Unknown

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown alkene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Methyl - 9H-fluorene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown phthalate

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown nitrile

Unknown acid ethyl ester

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown nitrile

Unknown alkyne

Unknown alkyne

CONCENTRATION()*i<tr«r>ig/g)

57

34

44

34

25

131

36

73

87

35

52

116

52

33

40

22

48

71

30

33

21

67

25

22

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO. 3015 SAMPLE TYPE Soil FRACTION SNA

INSTRUMENT 5996

SAMPLE

81584AI1S-6

FRN NO.

A3461


11/2 LMC

PEAK NO.

i2

3

' 4

5

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

RT(mln)

6.0

-7.9

9.6

11.7

12.0

13.1

14.0

16.0

17.8

18.0

18.3

18.8

19.1

19.4

19.5

20.5

21.1

21,8

22.6

22.7

24.1

25.4

27.6

27.9

CAS No.

*


No hits

Methyl ethyl benzene

Methyl ethyl benzene

Dimethyl ethyl benzene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Dimethyl ethyl benzene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Dime thy 1 naphthalene

Dimethylnaphthalene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown alkene

Unknown nitrile

Unknown hydrocarbonTrimethyl naphthalene

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown hydrocarbon

Unknown nitrile

Unknown alkene

Unknown nitrile

CONCENTRATION

76

28

39

26

28 .

23

22

53

40

24

23

21

34

79

71

32

100

36

119

42

39

77

21

79

GC/MS Library Search Data SummaryPROJECT NO.

SAMPLE

MB 4064

SAMPLE TYPE soil FRACTION BNA INSTRUMENT 5996

f RN NO.

A3 46 2


11/2 LMC

PEAK NO.(mln)5.0

CAS No. IDENTIFICATION OF BEST MATCH

4,4 dimethyl - 2 - pentene

CONCENTRATIONng/g)

176

6.2

6.5

Unknown 1291

Unknown hydrocarbon 67

6.7 Unknown hydrocarbon 116

8.0 Methylethylbenzene 426

24.9 Unknown phthalate 110

T.L fcr£ & ~

£ >_toi.e.i**»._«_.v__c , /MAA its Lsfj *<?* cs>

' i j f r j t ftta^E si^'/l li - - - T - " - ' - r - i -

Vtlu a. »VN)j>__AElSj

]._' ' I l li--f--M-4-t-~

, / , \,".•** A+fy7. ./; /((.. •M/sX'. ~i

te

'A'* 3 - 01 -'A'* 3 -\J*-*- [Q; -

1 1-i-H

nS :U-444

L-U-• t - t -

. I i.' ' I '

• I i'"i r t~

fe**.-

ft*

I

j^cr•>M

y-/2 -

. i

L'

i i i in

-.

1 : . : j . ; i ^ , ±.'to**

jijjji I I I I : i ' ' ' • • ' ' i ' I

_lJj_L... ! J...L[.l..lli..L_LLl.LJ.!J..L^

: ! : /! : , •'!_-!-.-!_; #|- /reT , f.y r:i i i i' ' : i ',

^ LbLli ^

LL>r 6-?--

Sk*tc£~SL,L

9 X I O N B d d V

( fa-

j

0Z_-P.'_-2

02-01-1

A

A

4s)OZ-'Vl'JL

-"T"-^?—

OX-P2-V

^

f'-3LUO-

„ _

#**-

...0-.0&/&&

4* "3r-

-T£A$*

jff 3* &14**' r?jfc*1

jJn-_ j_f?r

K<rv*Vjy^*«i

_3^_-_

Ssf/Sjtf ^

</S>'j-

?&.?—

&/•<* <?

yfc.?_ £7&

•••••

^_ ._^/^^r'«£l /•/£%& \rCti-' ^<3y?<c."-*>_ - _A/&&

^^^r<f^^^f^&^. - i

r**/^_b .wA«*tH'- ^d^

'-

? 6s*-,--/><**

//^ n^— yfc^ /*y^*" -rus* .a»*^ — ~f^

jHufjgiZj/K'

/SUjti

&L.-A\@&Ctf2r /

r

//£>- /1 — /^ _!

—<$e*f-&+1&JT

*' CA!

t £/tner ,f'/o , £±+^ S~ r

l7~ &£t*

x4X£-

<w—£*iSS&tS-fjCJ~*r

Je^f*-

^3/C7l£-/*

/1>5 7" /4

(5'2D pal* Cxjft

^^m

. .. .

i

2"Z'aa

-:. ,if*7c3f//tc. i^f

AWTcZ

3$...f /t

S

•7Z> ^

*-fs3jt? -/ JA£

**&&-.- .

>-^ V/<ie- " 1kv7^"5 . .

i

fw>f\s

r)

fn^^i>

&6*fl'\

AT££t»-<^\C/ks^4'>~ -.-

»,***£*'<?*> )

-.

t

-•

]i

--i

—

-

--

•

*tf :-r-j^,-^-; • ; • • ; - • ^ • ; : ^ , , . . : , ; . .

; i • ' , j 1

| : TO • *£>/& ' i . i —- 1 t- i' . " ; ' i

i i ' ' i , , i ' !

: • ' . ' ' , ' ; ; i ! '' . • ; ' ! :

: . . : ; • ! • ! ' ' I : ' :

_^ ; . 1 L :— L -i L.L^-i-- '' 1 - i

' j i i i ' : ' i 1 1—1! • ; i : i i ! • : !

. _.. . . j . ! . . i . j . . ; 1 . r : : . . 1 . : . . . . . |-^ . L-i-._^-U_l

i ! 1

i : ! ^ 4 - 4 J _LLi • ' • • - , , ; j.. i1 ' : • •• ' ,r • ' ' ~ . ' ' \ '1 : . ' , . ; ; ; ii ' • ; • •• '• i ' ! - . i—• -•- • :- i .- - .- - p

; • ! i

\ : • • • ' ' ' • u i r^ l-i. . t ; i i

; ! ; ' : .' ' : .' ' ' i • i i ' i' : \ • i . .h i "^r IT

!

3 X IQN3ddV

XIQN3ddV

J XIdN]d.9 XIQN3ddV

3 XION3ddV

9 XIQN3JHV

g" ^ /*• g» 5 / /Tfc^ m Ai »s

tt-tTTt-r : • - ! - : - ' - } • - : - :

t a 1~

-I

^^J VTOmiVN3d1

APPENDIX E:

Photo Log index Key


PAXTON AVENUE LAGOONS

FIELD INVESTIGATION

PHOTO LOG INDEX KEY

PHOTO NUMBER PHOTO DESCRIPTION(ROLL-FRAME) SAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION SHOT

III-l

III-2

III-3

III-4

III-5

III-6

III-7

III-8

III-9

111-10

III-ll

111-12

111-13

111-14

111-15

111-16

111-17

111-18

1 1 1-19

Note: 02-1-3,numbered

111-20

111-21

111-22

01-2

01-2

07-1

07-1

07-2

07-2

06-1

06-1

01-3

01-3

01-4

01-4

01-5

01-5

01-6

01-6

03-4

03-4

02-3

02-1-4, and 02-1-5 seenlocation most distant.

02-3

05-1

05-1 UV!|L»J,

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

North

North-Northeast

North-Northeast

North-Northeast

Northeast

Northeast

East

East

North

Northwest

South

South-Southwest

North-Northwest

North-Northwest

South-Southeast

Southeast

East

East

West

in background, lowest

Far

Near

Far

West-Southwest

South-Southeast

Southeast


rage

PHOTO NUMBER(ROLL-FRAME)

111-23

II1-24

IV-1

IV-2

IV-3

IV-4

IV-5

IV-6

IV-7

IV-8

IV-9

IV-10

IV-11

IV-12

IV-13

IV-14

IV-15

IV-16

IV-17

IV-18

IV-19

IV-20

IV-21

IV-22

IV-23

IV-24

PHOTO DESCRIPTIONSAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE DIRECTION SHOT

01-1 Near

01-1 Far

06-2 Near

06-2 Far

01-7 Near

01-7 Far

Ol-L-6 (Oil) Near

Ol-L-6 (Oil) Far

Ol-L-5 (Oil) Near

Ol-L-5 (Oil) Far

Ol-BS-4 (Tube) Near

Ol-BS-4 (Tube) Far

Ol-BS-3 (Tube) Near

Ol-BS-3 (Tube) Far

Ol-BS-2 (Tube) Near

Ol-BS-2 (Tube) Far

01-BS-l (Tube) Near

01-BS-l (Tube) Far

01-1-1 (Tube) Near

01-1-1 (Tube) Far

05-SS (Soil Composite) Near

05-SS (Soil Composite) Far

04-10 Near

04-10 Far

04-9 Near

04-9 Far

Northeast

Northeast

East-Northeast

East-Northeast

West

North-Northwest

East-Southeast

East-Southeast

West

West-Southwest

North-Northeast

Northwest

East

Southeast

Southeast

Southeast

East-Northeast

Southeast

Northeast

Northeast

East

East-Southeast

West-Southwest

West-Southwest

West-Southwest

West-Southwest




V-l

V-2

V-3

V-4

V-5

V-14

V-15

V-17

VI-1

VI-2

VI-3

VI-4

VI-5

VI-6

VI-7

VI-8

VI-9

VI-10

VI-11

VI-12

VI-13

VI-14

VI-15

VI-16

VI-17

VI-18

VI-19

02-1

02-1

02-1

02-1

02-1

02-2

02-2

02-2

04-8

04-8

04-7 & 7A

04-7 & 7A

03-3

03-3

03-2

03-2

03-1

03-1

04-6

04-6

04-5

04-5

04-4

04-4

04-3

04-3

04-2 L'lViliTZ

Far

Far

Near

Near

Far

Near

Near

Near

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

Near

Far

* Near

Northwest

Northwest

Northwest

Southeast

Northwest

South

North

North

West-Southwest

Northwest

West-Southwest

Southwest

West-Southwest

Southwest

North

North-Northeast

Northeast

Northeast

East-Northeast

East-Northeast

Southeast

East-Southeast

Northeast

Northeast

North-Northeast

North-Northeast

Northwest


pIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


VI-20

VI-21

VI-22


•fe

04-2

04-1

04-1

Far Northwest

Near East-Northeast

Far East


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI

APPENDIX F:

IEPA Background Analytical Data-Raised Area Soils Analysis


r\

ENVIRODYNEENGINEERS

August 21, 19853015-01000

RECEIVED

Mr. Mark KroenigJohn Mathes & Assoc.210 West Sand Bank Rd.PO Box 330Columbia, IL 62236

Dear Mr. Kroenig:

Enclosed are the dioxin (TCDD) data requested by Ms. Mary Dinkel of theIllinois EPA for the Paxton lagoon soil/sludge samples. The packageincludes not only a tabulation of the pertinent information, but copiesof the chromatographs and mass spectra as well.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call.

Sincerely,

r\

John J/. Conig io'Project Manager

JJC/bsmEnclosure

TABLE B-1 - TCDD DATA REPORT FORM

Labi Envirodyne Engineers, Inc.

Case No.i 3015-01000

Batch/Shipment No.: Relative

Page 1 of 11

Report Datei 8/12/85

Column i SP-2330Ion

SampleNumber

Paxton UnkPaxton UnkMHASpike I

1985ED

5 8/75 8/78/78/7

EC

YYYY

wetWeight(grams)

1.05.010.010.0

GC/MS AnalysisTCDD ( ppb )Meas . D.L.

ND 1.10ND 0.6R

NO 0.0371 .08

Instr.l.D.

4444

1985Date

8/88/88/88/8

Time

1012111011581242

Abundance320/322

0.412.420.460.76

332/334

0.780.780.780.78

Surrogate

Meas

10.511.210.710.8

tng). * Accy

105112107108

Relative Ion Abundance320

116921108226

322

2B638237

10828

257 328a

85 109940 122330 28906

3166 21655

332

2166022465576341512

334

2763428937159953225

FRNNo.

T0493T0494T0495T0496

Notest RB • Reagent BlankFB • Field Blank

MB - Method BlankPRN • File Reference Number

D • Duplicate/Fortified Field BlankD.L. • Detection Limit

N • Native TCDD ,SplkeND - Not Detected

R - Rejected Data

"Corrected for contribution by native TCDDi 0.9* of m/z 322 subtracted.

r-^^:^^:^"r^in^5,'-r'^r:-':v ^^W:::"^^^ -"^ ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY MEMORANDUM

August 23, 1985

Gary King '"*:

Mary E. Dinkel

0316000067 - Cook CountyChicago/Paxton Ave. LagoonFOI Request for Paxton Ave. Lagoon

This is to inform you that Mr. James Ambroso, ComplianceManager for Land and Lakes Company, which is located di-rectly west of .the Paxton Avenue Lagoon site, is submit-ting a Freedom of Information request regarding the R Iactivities that have recently been completed this pastAugust 17, 1985.

Please be advised that Land and Lakes may be involved Inlitigation that is undertaken for this site once final.;property ownership is determined.

MED:bf/6

cc: HJivision FileMitch LevinJim JansseA

any

11- 532-0570

• • • • • M I I I I M I I I I S I B

Instr.I.D.

notNunber

Dat«(1985)

T0040TOOSOT0051T0052T0055T0056T0057T0058T0061T0062T0063T0066

Solution ID Codes t

4/24/24/24/24/24/24/24/24/24/24/24/3

SolutionTine I.D.

091311 1 J1158124315421610165010252033210321590002

PCCC1CC2CC3CC1CC2PCCC3CC1CC2CC3PC

320

170201335730385139649

16263175713687174939146902668817464616740

FORM B-2. INITIAL CALIBRATION SUMMARYCasei 9 pt. Calibration

Peak Area (or Height)322

21399169803858317841919694043017334

223712186893408622232521253

323

2955

2221

2802

328

1090695161575512859756

1977011713822219559

PC • Performance checfc solutionCC1 • Concentration calibration solution No. 1 •CC2 • Concentration calibration solution No. 2 •CC3 - Concentration calibration solution No. 3 •

0.2 ug/ml1.0 ug/ml5.0 ug/ml

332

4465707833151230033872132621326337032760002749336R683834

334

5743490822405603836311237421004138476669777535392474034930

Native RFMeasured Mean

0.940.960.930.900.97

0.940.960..970.94 0.95

Surrogate RF1

Measured Mean

.11

.06

.03

.06

.05

.05

.11

.05

.04 1.06

TCDOI seiner

Resolution

1.5%

0.5%

1.0%

Date : < ft

Time: it'- 00 A.M.

Photograph By:

Location : Q 3 / & O O Q O 6 * ' ?

_ Coo £ _ Co.

/ L-A Voor-l-S

Comments; Photograph taken

toward the tJogjU p e^sT "ffct

o~f

RECEIVED

JUN211985

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATE: April 18, 1985

TO: Division File

FROM: M. Levin, Maywood/FOS

SUBJECT: Paxton Avenue Lagoons Visit0 3 1 6 0 0 0 C 6 7 - Cook County - Chicago/Paxton

MEMORANDUM

RECEIVED

10

,EP/VDLPC

Chuck Gruntman and I visited the Paxton Avenue Lagoons onApril 18, 1985. We observed two large oily ponds with numerousdead birds floating on the surface. The purpose of this visitwas to familiarize myself with the site.

cc: Northern Region

IL 532-0570

V .

FORM D-3. OONTINlltMG CALIBRATION SUMMARY - 2, 3,7,8-TCDO

Instr.I .D.

FRNNumber

Date(1985) Time

SolutionI .D.

4444

T0491T0492T0502T0503

8/88/88/88/B

0825091516231710

CC1PCCC1PC

Peafc Area (or Height)320

234091 1641 .2401110576

322

30046151583098313780

323

.

2084

-• 1734

328

18409214091975818389

332

11 852840fi6912247837493

334

1514285206215803048313

Native2,3,7,8-RF Surrogate Rf

Measured

0.99

0.98

Mean

0.93

0.93

Measured

1 .121.151 .161 .06

Mean

1 .06

1 .061 .06

TCDDI some r

Resolution

Solution ID Codes:

PCCC1

Performance check solutionConcentration calibration solution No. 0.2 ucj/ml

FORM B-4. TCDD DATA REPORT - PARTIAL SCAN CONFIRMATION AND QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

SampleNumber

Response Ratios % Relative Abundance8

320/322 320/324 257/322 257/259 194/196 160 161 194 196 257 259 320 322 324FRN

Number

Not required

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

Mean Accuracy, Surrogate Measurements!Accuracy, Port!fled/Spike Field Blank:"Relative Difference (\), Duplicate Analysisi_

"Relative to i»/e 322.

108.0±2.9100%

N/A

Number of Data pointsiSample No.:Sample No.i

Spiked Blank

FORM B-5. GC OPERATING CONDITIONSConditions B

Column Coating

Film Thickness

Column Dimensions

Helium

Initial Temperature

Initial Time

Temperature Program

2,3,7,8-TCDD Retention Time

SP-2330

0.20 urn

60 m x 0.25 mm

26 psi

160 °C

3 minutes

25°/min to 240°C and hold

27.0 minutes

IIIIIIIII

APPENDIX G:

B Dioxin Analytical Data-Lagoons/South Pond Sludge/SedimentComposite Sample

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

IJohn Mathes & Associates, Inc.

aqualab inc.850 West Bartlett Rd.Bartlett IL 60103312-289-3100

Fi15 July 1985

Ms. Sue MurphyI EPADivision of Land Pollution2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield IL 62706

RECEIVED

JUL 17 1985

IEPA-DLPC

Dear Ms. Murphy:

I

I

I

I

I

I

Enclosed are the analytical results for the 2 soil samplesreceived by AQUALAB on 3 July 1985. These samples were from yourPaxton Ave. Lagoon project. These samples were analyzed foryour requested parameters. This work was performed under theContract Laboratory Program.

Analytical methods used by AQUALAB were USEPA approved methodsobtained from: "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods," SW-846, Second Edition, July 1982.These methods were referenced in the Q.A. Project Plan.

Volatile organic analyses (VGA) were performed using EPAMethods 8240 and 5030. Aliquots of the samples are placed ina sparging device. Internal standards and deuterium labelledsurrogates are added to verify the analytical results andprovide qualitative and quantative references for everysample. The samples are then purged with helium and thevolatile organics are transferred to the gas stream. Theorganics are removed from the gas stream with a Tenax/SilicaGel trap. When purging is complete, the trap is rapidlyheated and the trapped organics transferred to the analyticalchromatographic column of a gas chromatograph/massspectrometer (GC/MS). As the individual components elute,complete mass spectra are collected and stored by a computersystem. The data are then processed by custom computerprograms and also evaluated manually to detect and quantifypriority pollutants. Identifications are verified bycomparison of the sample component mass spectrum andretention time of that standard component.

Base/Neutral and Acid (BN/A) compounds were analyzed usingEPA Methods 8250 and 3540. Aliquots of the samples areextracted with methylene chloride. The extracts areconcentrated and analyzed by GC/MS using the same approach asthe volatile organics.

aqualab inc.850 West Bartlett Rd. INI 17 1985Bartlett IL 60103312-289-3100 IEPA-DLPC

Ms. Sue Murphy15 July 1985Page Two

Pesticides and PCB's were analyzed using EPA Methods 8080 and3540. Aliquots of the samples are extracted with methylenechloride. The extracts are concentrated and cleaned up usingflorisil. The prepared extract is then analyzed by GC usingan electron capture detector.

Metals were analyzed by flame atomic absorption afterdigestion.

Results on these samples are in rag/Kg on a dry weight basis. Thedetection limits on the base neutral and acid compounds arehigher than normal due to the need for higher final volumes.This was because of the significant amount of extractablematerial. This material did not chromatograph very well and mayinclude organic acids. The extract was very dark in color.

The high organic background of these samples resulted in highdilutions. Because of these dilutions, extractable surrogatespike data could not be evaluated. In addition, the dilutionsrequired prior to metals analysis resulted in poor spike recoveryfor many metals.

If after reviewing these results or Q.C. Report #3 you have anyquestions, please feel free to call. AQUALAB has been pleased toprovide these analytical services for you.

Sincerely,

AQUALAB INC.

Robert N. BucaroDivision Manager

RNB/dabEncls.

aqualab inc.850 West Bartleit Rd.EJartlett IL 60103312-289-3100

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Ms. Sue MurphylEPA/Division of Land Pollution2200 Churchill Road _Springfield IL 62706

15 July 1985Sample No. 83958

SAMPLE RECEIVED: 07-03-85SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Surface Composite G01

DATE TAKEN: 07-03-85

RECEIVED

JUL 1? 1985

JEPA-DLPCVOLATILE COMPOUNDS

mg/Kg Compound

<0.6 Benzene (4V)<0.6 Carbon Tetrachloride (6V)<0.6 Chlorobenzene (7V)<0.6 1,2-Dichloroethane (10V)<0.6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (11V)<0.6 1.1-Dichloroethane (13V)<0.6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (14V)<0.6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (15V)<1.2 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether (19V)<0.6 Chloroform (23V) .<0.6 1.1-Dichloroethylene (29V)<0.6 1.2-Cis Dichloroethylene<0.6 1,3 Dichlorobenzene<0.6 1.2-Trans-Dichloropropylene

mg/Kg Compound

<0.6 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene (30V<0.6 1.2-Dichloropropane (32V)<0.6 1,3-Cis-Dichloropropylene (33V<0.6 Ethylbenzene (38V)<0.6 Methylene Chloride (44V)<0.6 Bromoform (47V)<0.6 Dichlorobromomethane (48V)<0.6 Chlorodibromomethane (51V)1.4 Tetrachloroethylene (85V)<0.6 Toluene (86V)<0.6 Trichloroethylene (87V)<0.6 Xylenes, total<0.6 1,2 Dichlorobenzene<0.6 1,4 Dichlorobenzene

Results on a dry weight basis,

Robert N. Bucaro

inc.50 West Bartlett Rd.lartlett IL 60103, 12-289-3100

ANALYTIC AIL REPORT

4s. Sue MurphylEPA/Division of Land Pollution2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield IL 62706


SAMPLE RECEIVED: 07-03-85SAN.PLE DESCRIPTION: Surface Composite G01


ing/Kg Compound

<19<Ui!<19

<97<97

(8B)

Acenaphthene (IB)Benzidine (5B)1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobenzene (9B)Hexachloroethane (12B)Bis(2-chloroethyl)Ether (18B)2-Chloronaphthalene (20B)3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine (28B)2,4-Dinitrotoluene (35B)2,6-Dinitrotoluene (36B)Fluoranthene (39B)4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether (40) <194-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether (41B) <19Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether (42) <19Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane (43B) <19Hexachlorobutadiene (52B) <19Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (53B) <19Isophorone (54B) <19Naphthalene (55B) <19

RECEIVEDBASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS

JUL 17 1985mg/Kg Compound

IEPA-DLPCNitrobenzene (56B)N-Nitrosodimethylamine (61B)N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (62B)N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (63B)Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate (66B)Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (67B)Di-N-Butyl Phthalate (68B)Di-N-Octyl Phthalate (69B)Diethyl Phthalate (70B)Dimethyl Phthalate (71B)Benzo(a)Anthracene (72B)Benzo(a)Pyrene (73B)Benzo(b)Fluoranthene (74B)Benzo(k)Fluoranthene (75B)Chrysene (76B)Acenaphthylene (77B)Anthracene (78B)Benzo(ghi)Perylene (79B)Fluorene (BOB)Phenanthrene (8IB)Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene (82B)Ideno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene (83B)Pyrene (84B)

ACID COMPOUNDS

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (21A)4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol (22A)2-Chlorophenol (24A)2,4-Dichlorophenol (31A)2,4-Dimethylphenol (34A)2-Nitrophenol (57A)2.4,5-Trichlorophenol

Results on a dry weight basis.

<97 4-Nitrophenol (58A)<97 2,4-Dinitrophenol (59A)<97 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (60A)<97 Pentachlorophenol (64A)<19 Phenol (65A)<19 2-Methylphenol<19 4-Methylphenol

fly

aqualab inc.850 We:5t Bartlett Rd.Baillett IL 60103312-289-3100

ANALYTIC AIL REPORT

Ms. Sue MurphylEPA/Division of Land Pollution2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield IL 62706


SAMPLE RECEIVED: 07-03-85SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Surface Composite G01

PESTICIDES

ing/Kg Compound

<0.0125<0.0249320.<0.0249<0.0249<0.0249<0.0125<0.0249X0.0249<0.0249K0.0249<0.0125<0.0125<0.125

Aldrin (89P)Dieldrin (90P)Chlordane (91P)4,4'-DDT (92P)4,4'-DDE (93P)4,4'-ODD (94P)alpha-Endosulfan (95P)beta-Endosulfan (96P)Endosulfan Sulfate (97P)Endrin (98P)Endrin Aldehyde (99P)Heptachlor (100P)Heptachlor Epoxide (101P)Methoxychlor


RECEIVED

JUL 17 1385

IEPA-DLPC

mg/Kg Compound

<0.0125<0.0125<0.0125<0.0125<0.125<0.249<0.125<0.125<0.12511.2<0.125<0.125<0.0249

Alpha-BHCbeta-BHCgamma-BHCdelta-BHCPCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248PCB-1260PCB-1016ToxapheneMirex

(102P)(103P)(104P)(105P)(106P)(107P)(108P)(109P)(HOP)(HIP)(112P)(113P)


Robert N. Bucaro


JUL .i !d85

ANALYTIC AIL REPORT

Ms. Sue MurphylEPA/Division of Land Pollution2200 Churchill Road _Springfield IL 62706


SAMPLE RECEIVED: 07-03-85SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Soil Composite G02


VOLATILE COMPOUNDS

ing/Kg Compound

•CO. 6 Benzene (4V)<0.6 Carbon Tetrachloride (6V)<0.6 Chlorobenzene (7V)<0.6 1,2-Dichloroethane (10V)<0.6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (11V)•CO.6 1,1-Dichloroethane (13V)<0.6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (14V)•CO. 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (15V)<1.2 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether (19V)•CO. 6 Chloroform (23V)<0.6 1,1-Dichloroethylene (29V)<0.6 1,2-Cis Dichloroethylene<0.6 1,3 Dichlorobenzene<0.6 1,2-Trans-Dichloropropylene

mg/Kg Compound

<0.6 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene (30V<0.6 1,2-Dichloropropane (32V)<0.6 1,3-Cis-Dichloropropylene (33V<0.6 Ethylbenzene (38V)0.7 Methylene Chloride (44V)<0.6 Bromoform (47V)<0.6 Dichlorobromomethane (48V)<0.6 Chlorodibromomethane (51V)1.0 Tetrachloroethylene (85V)<0.6 Toluene (86V)<0.6 Trichloroethylene (87V)<0.6 Xylenes, total<0.6 1,2 Dichlorobenzene<0.6 1,4 Dichlorobenzene

Results on a dry weight basis,

Robert N. Eucaro


ANALYTICAL REPORT

M:;. Sue MurphyIlvPA/Division of Land Pollution2:'.00 Churchill RoadSpringfield IL 62706



BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS


RECEIVED

JUL 17 1i

ing/Kg Compound mg/Kg Compound JEPA-DLPC

<1(5 Acenaphthene (IB)<126 Benzidine C5B)<16 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene (8B)

Hexachlorobenzene (9B)Hexachloroethane (12B)Bis(2-chloroethyl)Ether (18B)2-Chloronaphthalene (20B)3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine (28B)2,4-Dinitrotoluene (35B)2,6-Dinitrotoluene (36B)Fluoranthene (39B)4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether (40)

<16<16<16<16<16<16<16<16<16<16<16<16

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether (41B) <16Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether (42) <16Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane (43B) <16Hexachlorobutadiene (52B) <16Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (53B) <16Isophorone (54B) <16Naphthalene (55B) <16

Nitrobenzene (56B)N-Nitrosodimethylaraine (61B)N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (62B)N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (63B)Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate (66B)Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (67B)Di-N-Butyl Phthalate (68B)Di-N-Octyl Phthalate (69B)Diethyl Phthalate (70S)Dimethyl Phthalate (71B)Benzo(a)Anthracene (72B)Benzo(a)Pyrene (73B)Benzo(b)Fluoranthene (74B)Benzo(k)Fluoranthene (75B)Chrysene (76B)Acenaphthylene (77B)Anthracene (78B)Benzo(ghi)Perylene (79B)Fluorene (80B)Phenanthrene (8IB)Dibenzo{a,h)Anthracene (82B)Ideno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene (83B)Pyrene (84B)

ACID COMPOUNDS

<H5

<7H

Results

2,4-2-2,2,2-2,

4.6-Trichlorophenol (21A) <78Chloro-3-Methylphenol (22A) <78Chlorophenol (24A) <784-Dichlorophenol (31A) <784-Dimethylphenol (34A) <16Nitrophenol (57A} <164,5-Trichlorophenol <16

on a dry weight basis.

4-Nitrophenol (58A)2,4-Dinitrophenol (59A)2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol (60A)Pentachlorophenol (64A)Phenol (65A)2-Methylphenol4-Methylphenol

aqualab inc.850 West Bartlett Rd.Bailletl IL 60103312-289-3100

JUL i.7

IEPA-DLPC

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Ms;. Sue MurphyIlSPA/Division of Land Pollution2I200 Churchill RoadSpringfield IL 62706




PESTICIDES

mcr/Kg Compound

<0.0108 Aldrin (89P)<0.0215 Dieldrin (90P)170. Chlordane (91P)<0,,0215 4.4'-DDT (92P)<0.0215 4,4'-DD£ .(93P)<0,,0215 4, 4'-ODD (94P)<0,,0108 alpha-Endosulfan (95P)<C..0215 beta-Endosulfan (96P)<C.0215 Endosulfan Sulfate (97P)<C.0215 Endrin (98P)<0.0215 Endrin Aldehyde (99P)<G.0108 Heptachlor (100P)<0.0108 Heptachlor Epoxide (101P)<0.108 Methoxychlor

mg/Kg Compound

<0.0108<0.0108•C0.0108<0.0108<0.108<0.215<0.108<0.108<0.1089.47<0.108<0.108<0.0215

Alpha-BHCbeta-BHCgamma-BHCdelta-BHCPCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248PCB-126OPCB-1016ToxapheneMirex

(102P)(103P)(104P)(105P)(106P)(107P)(108P)(109P)(HOP)(HIP)(112P)(113P)


Robe'rt N. Bucaro

aqualap inc.8150 West Bartlett Rd.Barllett iL 60103312-289-3100 JUL 1? 1985

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

RE1PORT

Ms. Sue MurnhyIEPA-DIVISION OF LAND POLLUTION2200 ChurchillSpringfield IL 62706


.SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Surface Composite G01

Date Taken: 07-03-85 1115 d Da,te Received: 07-03-85

Solids, tot. 66.58

Results on a dry weight basis:

CyanideAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumChromiumCobaltCopperIron, totalLeadManganeseMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverThalliumZincTinVanadium

0.6714,000.

6.366.

6.8116.Not Determined559.24,800.840.1370.0.3577.

4.553.637.

45.

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

Robert N. Bucaro

I aqualab inc.1 8:>() West Bartlett Rd.

E.artlelt IL 601033 •» 2-289-3100

/ '•!

Ms. Sue MurphyIEPA-DIVISION OF LAND POLLUTION2200 ChurchillSpringfield IL 62706

REIPOFtT


JUL 1? 1965

IEPA-DLPC

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Soil Composite G02

Date Taken: 07-03-85 1115 d Date Received: 07-03-85

Solids, tot. 89.15

Results on a dry weight basis:

CyanideAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumChromiumCobaltCopperIron, totalLeadManganeseMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverThalliumZincTinVanadium

2.09050.<1.6.382.<1.7.4200.Not Determined808.32,800.2560.2600.<0.0184.<1.4.232.1160.26.64.

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

Robert N. Bucaro

john mathes & associates inc - summary report … · summary report field investigation paxton...

Documents