john hattie. overview of visible learning result of 15 years’ research and synthesises over 800...
TRANSCRIPT
Visible Learning
John Hattie
Overview of Visible LearningResult of 15 years’ research and synthesises
over 800 meta-analyses relating to the influences on achievement in school-aged students
Identifies 138 influences on learning
Meta-Analyses results provide a “standard” from which to judge effects
It is a comparison based on typical, real-world effects rather than based on the strongest cause possible, or with the weakest cause imaginable.
Meta-Analyses Based on Six Major Contributors to Learning:
Contribution # of Studies
Student 11,101
Home 2,211
Schools 4,150
Teacher 2,225
Curricula 7,102
Teaching 25,860
TOTAL 52,649
Meta-Analyses Based on Six Major Contributors to Learning:
Contribution
Student • Prior knowledge of learning• Expectations• Degree of openness to
experiences• Emerging beliefs about the
value and worth to them from investing in learning• Engagement• Ability to build a sense of
self from engagement in learning
Scale
138 factorsEffectStandard deviations (SD)
Standard Deviation
1 Standard Deviation• Students do better than 84% of students
not in that initiative• Typically represent 2 years growth in one
year
FocusWhat is effective?What you can impact?
Hattie’s “Barometer of Influence”
0.0
Neg
ativ
e
© John HattieVisible Learning
0.150.4Medium
1.2
High
Reverse Effects
Developmental
Effects
Teacher Effects
0.7
1.0
DesiredEffects
d=0.4+ Influences that have greatest impact on student
achievement outcomes
d=0.0 and d=0.15What
students could
probably achieve if there was
no schooling.
d=below 0.15Can be considered potentially
harmful and probably should not be implemented
-0.2
Low
d=0.15 and d=0.40Influences in this zone are similar to what teachers can accomplish
in a typical year of schooling.
Rank Order of Influences on LearningBased on 138 Influences
© John HattieVisible Learning
MobilityTelevision
Ability GroupingIndividualized Instruction
MainstreamingHomework
Time on TaskReducing Anxiety
MotivationClassroom Management
Home EnvironmentDirect Instruction
Professional development Classroom BehaviorSelf-Report Grades
138137
121100
9288
7066
5142
3126
196
1
Overview of Visible LearningResult of 15 years’ research and synthesises
over 800 meta-analyses relating to the influences on achievement in school-aged students
Identifies 138 influences on learning
Meta-Analyses results provide a “standard” from which to judge effects
It is a comparison based on typical, real-world effects rather than based on the strongest cause possible, or with the weakest cause imaginable.
Meta-Analyses Based on Six Major Contributors to Learning:
Contribution # of Studies
Student 11,101
Home 2,211
Schools 4,150
Teacher 2,225
Curricula 7,102
Teaching 25,860
TOTAL 52,649
Meta-Analyses Based on Six Major Contributors to Learning:
Contribution
Student • Prior knowledge of learning• Expectations• Degree of openness to
experiences• Emerging beliefs about the
value and worth to them from investing in learning• Engagement• Ability to build a sense of
self from engagement in learning
Scale
138 factorsEffectStandard deviations (SD)
Standard Deviation
1 Standard Deviation• Students do better than 84% of students
not in that initiative• Typically represent 2 years growth in one
year
FocusWhat is effective?What you can impact?
Hattie’s “Barometer of Influence”
-0.2
0.0
Neg
ativ
e
© John HattieVisible Learning
0.15
Low
0.4
Medium
1.2
High
Reverse Effects
Developmental
Effects
Teacher Effects
0.7
1.0
DesiredEffects
Rank Order of Influences on LearningBased on 138 Influences
© John HattieVisible Learning
MobilityTelevision
Ability GroupingIndividualized Instruction
MainstreamingHomework
Time on TaskReducing Anxiety
MotivationClassroom Management
Home EnvironmentDirect Instruction
Professional development Classroom BehaviorSelf-Report Grades
138137
121100
9288
7066
5142
3126
196
1
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.73
0.7
1.0
DesiredEffects
Feedback
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.06
0.7
1.0
Whole Language
Curricula
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.59
0.7
1.0
Direct Instruction
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.21
0.7
1.0
Class Size
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.61
0.7
1.0
Not labeling students
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.17
0.7
1.0
Family Structure
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.34
0.7
1.0
MobilityMobility
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.09
0.7
1.0
Summer Vacation
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.35
0.7
1.0
Drama/Arts
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.16
0.7
1.0
Retention
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.20
0.7
1.0
Charter Schools
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.59
0.7
1.0
Coop. vs. Indv. Learning
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.43
0.7
1.0
School Size
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.51
0.7
1.0
Parental Involvement
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.57
0.7
1.0
Socio-econ Status
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.73
0.7
1.0
DesiredEffects
Feedback
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.06
0.7
1.0
Whole Language
Curricula
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.59
0.7
1.0
Direct Instruction
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.21
0.7
1.0
Class Size
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.61
0.7
1.0
Not labeling students
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.17
0.7
1.0
Family Structure
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.34
0.7
1.0
MobilityMobility
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.09
0.7
1.0
Summer Vacation
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.35
0.7
1.0
Drama/Arts
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = - 0.16
0.7
1.0
Retention
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.90
0.7
1.0
Formative evaluation
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.20
0.7
1.0
Charter Schools
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.59
0.7
1.0
Coop. vs. Indv. Learning
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.43
0.7
1.0
School Size
School
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.51
0.7
1.0
Parental Involvement
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.57
0.7
1.0
Socio-econ Status
Home
DesiredEffects
Se =
0.40.15
0.0
-0.2
Teacher
Developmental
Reverse
1.2
Neg
ativ
e
Low H
igh
Medium
© John HattieVisible Learning
Feedback d = 0.72
0.7
1.0
Tchr-Stu Relationships
School
DesiredEffects