john doe - tcc online · john doe - [email protected] confidential 9. manager importance...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTERS
introduction
how to work with the results
evaluated competencies
evaluation scale
evaluators
inspiration for your development
in what items do others see you differently than you see yourself
total rating
total order of areas
how does the self-assessment compare to the feedback given by other evaluators:
assessment of individual competences
order of partial competences
how does the self-assessment compare to the feedback given by other evaluators within the competences
feedback from individual groups of evaluators
order of competences by partial groups of evaluators
evaluator groups sorted by variation of feedback
recommendations from evaluators
summary for individual questions by competences
summary for individual questions by competences for individual groups of evaluators
summary for individual questions by evaluation
summary for individual questions by evaluation for individual groups of evaluators
evaluation of individual behaviours within the competences covered
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 2
INTRODUCTIONThis report is the result of a 360° feedback review by TCC online s.r.o.
HOW TO WORK WITH THE RESULTSThe results of the 360° feedback review is meant mainly for you and your future personal development - it gives you feedbackabout how your external environment sees you. The final report starts with a summary and proceeds to give a detailed feedbackin individual blocks.
EVALUATED COMPETENCIESGeneral
Personal attitude
Work competences
Interaction with others
Management
Team leadership
Strategic management
Sales
Sales/ external client
EVALUATION SCALEThe following scale was used for the feedback review:
Cannot evaluate 0
Disagree 1
Mostly disagree 2
Mostly agree 3
Agree 4
EVALUATION SCALE - IMPORTANCE
Evaluators could also express how important the evaluated items are for them on a scale: 1 2 3 4 5 The evaluated person could also express how important the evaluated items are for him/her on a scale: 1 2 3 4 5 Values on the significance scale are as follows: 1 - It has a key importance for me, 2 - It is very important for me, 3 - It is ratherimportant for me, 4 - It is not very important for me, 5 - It is not important for me. In case there are no data for importance, there is sign: ? These values are labeled later in this report as "importance".
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 3
EVALUATORS
EVALUATORSEVALUATORS EVALUATEDEVALUATED
ColleagueColleague 44
ManagerManager 11
SubordinateSubordinate 55
Self-assessmentSelf-assessment 11
Throughout the output report, results for Self-assessment and an average result for other evaluators are compared. This averageis then labeled as Feedback from others .
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 4
INSPIRATION FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENTYou can find both best and worst evaluated questions across the competences below.Value shown at each item is the average evaluation across all evaluators without self-assessment.
ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES importance
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clear steps. 3.2 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in their needs. 3.4 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the business dialogueaccordingly.
2.7 ?
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutual cooperation orbusiness.
2.8 ?
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them to perform ata high level.
3.4 ?
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENTAREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT importance
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/her field andhow to do it.
3.5 4.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strives for furtherdevelopment.
3.1 ?
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others into account. 3.3 2.0
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
3.6
3.25
2.86
2.83
2.67
2.67
2.63
2.6
1.17
1.38
1.4
1.57
1.71
1.71
1.8
1.83
1.83
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 5
You can see here what items are percieved by your evaluators as the most important onesYou do not have to focus your further development only on the items evaluated as lower, but also on these that are important for others, even though theybelong those that are generally evaluated higher.
THE MOST IMPORTANT COMPETENCES BY EVALUATORSTHE MOST IMPORTANT COMPETENCES BY EVALUATORS importance
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/her jobdescription.
2.3 4.0
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
2.5 5.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstances quickly andeasily.
2.5 ?
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aims of thecompany and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.6 3.0
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver their bestperformance.
2.6 ?
2.33
2.43
2.29
1.8
2.83
2.1
2.11
2.56
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 6
INSPIRATION FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENT BY GROUPS OF EVALUATORSBelow, you can find best and worst evaluated items across competences. While you can build upon your best evaluated items/advantages and look foropportunities for their use in future, you can look for priorities for your next development in the near future in your worst evaluated items.Value shown at each item is the average of evaluations across the given group of evaluators.
ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES
COLLEAGUECOLLEAGUE
importance
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the business dialogueaccordingly.
2.3 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
3.0 5.0
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.0 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.3 3.0
MANAGERMANAGER
importance
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 2.0 3.0
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.0 3.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clear steps. 1.0 ?
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them to perform ata high level.
5.0 ?
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/her jobdescription.
2.0 4.0
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 5.0 2.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 2.0 4.0
3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 7
SUBORDINATESUBORDINATE
importance
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 4.0 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in their needs. 4.0 ?
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 2.3 2.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clear steps. 4.0 ?
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 4.0 ?
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 2.7 5.0
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with any work tasks. 3.5 4.0
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutual cooperation orbusiness.
2.0 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinates and supportsthem in self-development.
3.5 4.0
AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENTAREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT
COLLEAGUECOLLEAGUE
importance
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 2.0 2.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.7 2.0
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.0 3.0
4
3.33
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 8
MANAGERMANAGER
importance
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 4.0 2.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 4.0 5.0
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 3.0 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutual cooperation orbusiness.
3.0 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in their needs. 2.0 ?
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strives for furtherdevelopment.
2.0 ?
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.0 3.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 4.0 2.0
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
1.0 5.0
SUBORDINATESUBORDINATE
importance
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/her field andhow to do it.
3.2 4.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
2.7 4.0
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.8 4.0
You can see here what items are percieved by your evaluators as the most important onesYou do not have to focus your further development only on the items evaluated as lower, but also on these that are important for others, even though theybelong those that are generally evaluated higher.
THE MOST IMPORTANT COMPETENCES BY EVALUATORSTHE MOST IMPORTANT COMPETENCES BY EVALUATORS
COLLEAGUECOLLEAGUE
importance
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 1.7 ?
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 1.7 ?
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.0 ?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.33
1.4
2
2.33
2.33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 9
MANAGERMANAGER
importance
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clear steps. 1.0 ?
Establishes contact with new clients. 1.0 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
1.0 5.0
SUBORDINATESUBORDINATE
importance
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutual cooperation orbusiness.
2.0 ?
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.0 ?
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.2 ?
4
2
1
3
2.25
2.25
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 10
IN WHAT ITEMS DO OTHERS SEE YOU DIFFERENTLY THAN YOU SEE YOURSELFLower, you can find items across competences that show the greatest difference between your self-assessment and evaluations of others. The difference isshown in charts in red color.Areas in which you evaluate yourself higher than how others perceive you can inspire you to think about why there is such a difference and what can youdo in order to align the perception of you and others more.
HIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENTHIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENT Self-assessmentFeedback from
others
difference inevaluation
importance
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinions and strives toreach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
HIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERSHIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERS Feedback fromothers Self-assessment
difference inevaluation
importance
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
IN WHAT ITEMS DO OTHER GROUPS OF EVALUATORS SEE YOU DIFFERENTLY THAN YOU SEEYOURSELFLower, you can find items across competences that show the greatest difference between your self-assessment and evaluations of given group of evaluators.The difference is shown in charts in red color.Areas in which you evaluate yourself higher than how others perceive you can inspire you to think about why there is such a difference and what can youdo in order to align the perception of you and others more.
42.2
1.8
42.4
1.6
42.4
1.6
2.831
1.83
2.571
1.57
2.51
1.5
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 11
COLLEAGUECOLLEAGUE
HIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENTHIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENT Self-assessment Colleague
difference inevaluation
importance
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinions and strives toreach mutual agreement.
2.5 2.0
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.0 3.0
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.7 2.0
HIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERSHIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERS Colleague Self-
assessment
difference inevaluation
importance
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
3.0 5.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 2.7 4.0
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aims of thecompany and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.5 3.0
MANAGERMANAGER
HIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENTHIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENT Self-assessment Manager
difference inevaluation
importance
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 1.0 5.0
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 2.0 4.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others into account. 3.0 2.0
HIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERSHIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERS Manager Self-
assessment
difference inevaluation
importance
Recognises and deals with risks. 2.0 4.0
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and gives them spaceto work independently.
3.0 1.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 2.0 4.0
41.5
2.5
31
2
42.25
1.75
3.331
2.33
2.671
1.67
2.51
1.5
42
2
32
1
32
1
41
3
31
2
32
1
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 12
SUBORDINATESUBORDINATE
HIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENTHIGHER SELF-ASSESSMENT Self-assessment Subordinate
difference inevaluation
importance
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 4.0 1.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
2.7 4.0
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 2.8 5.0
HIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERSHIGHER EVALUATION BY OTHERS Subordinate Self-
assessment
difference inevaluation
importance
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 2.3 2.0
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer to discussinga specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 2.7 5.0
42
2
31.33
1.67
42.4
1.6
31
2
31
2
31
2
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 13
TOTAL RATING
This part of report is aimed on summarizing areas of competences and gives you basic information about how you evaluateyourself in comparison with other people around you.
It is easy to see in the chart, how much your own evaluation of yourself is in match with how others see you. Meaning, whetheryou evaluate yourself higher than people in your environment, or the other way around, or in which areas.
If the differences are large, try to think about what can be causing them and what useful information this tells you.
The values in the graph show the average for evaluators for a given area.
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 14
TOTAL ORDER OF AREAS
In this chapter of report, you can take a closer look at what areas are evaluated better than others by other people and thereforewhat areas give you solid ground to build on in your future endeavors.
On the other hand, areas that are evaluated lower can steer you in your future development. While thinking about this, pleasedo not forget to consider which areas are those truly important to you and focus especially on them.
YOU RANKED YOUR AREAS OF COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER::YOU RANKED YOUR AREAS OF COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER::
1. (average 2.77 ) 3.6
2. (average 2.5 ) 3.5
3. (average 1.48 ) 2.8
OTHERS RANKED YOUR AREAS OF COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:OTHERS RANKED YOUR AREAS OF COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:
1. (average 2.39 ) 2.8
2. (average 2.24 ) 3.2
3. (average 2.23 ) 3.1
General
Sales
Management
Sales
Management
General
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 15
HOW DOES THE SELF-ASSESSMENT COMPARE TO THE FEEDBACK GIVEN BY OTHEREVALUATORS:
SELF-ASSESSMENTSELF-ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK FROMFEEDBACK FROMOTHERSOTHERS
DIFFERENCEDIFFERENCE
1. General 0.54
2. Sales 0.11
3. Management -0.76
Those areas where you rated yourself better than others rated you are highlighted in colours. Purple colour indicates those areas where your rating issignificantly different from the rating from others. The intensity of the colour signifies the materiality of the difference on the evaluation scale:
difference in results: less than 25% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 25-50% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 50-75% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: above 75% of the evaluation scale
In addition to the evaluation result, in a colour circle the table also shows the importance assigned to the given item by the evaluated person and theevaluators.
2.77 3.6 2.23 3.1
2.5 3.5 2.39 2.8
1.48 2.8 2.24 3.2
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 16
ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL COMPETENCES
This part of report is aimed on specific competences and gives you basic information about how you evaluate yourself incomparison with your surroundings.
It is easy to see in the chart, how much you own evaluation of yourself is in match with how others see you. Meaning, whetheryou evaluate yourself higher than people in your environment, or the other way around, or in which competences.
If the differences are large, try to think about what can be causing them and what useful information this tells you.
The values in the graph show the average for evaluators for a given competence.
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 17
ORDER OF PARTIAL COMPETENCESIn this chapter of report, you can take a closer look at what competences are evaluated better than others by other people andtherefore what competences give you solid ground to build on in your future endeavors.
On the other hand, competences that are evaluated lower can steer you in your future development. While thinking about this,please do not forget to consider which competences are those truly important to you and focus especially on them.
YOU RANKED YOUR COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:YOU RANKED YOUR COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:
1. (average 3 ) 4.3 General
2. (average 2.8 ) 3.6 General
3. (average 2.5 ) 2.8 General
4. (average 2.5 ) 3.5 Sales
5. (average 1.75 ) 2.5 Management
6. (average 1.2 ) 3.0 Management
OTHERS RANKED YOUR COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:OTHERS RANKED YOUR COMPETENCES IN THIS ORDER:
1. (average 2.39 ) 2.8 Sales
2. (average 2.35 ) 3.2 General
3. (average 2.35 ) 3.3 Management
4. (average 2.2 ) 3.1 General
5. (average 2.14 ) 2.9 General
6. (average 2.13 ) 3.1 Management
Your own assessment across all competences is EqualEqual (average 2.29 ) compared to the rating from others (average 2.26 )
Personal attitude
Interaction with others
Work competences
Sales/ external client
Team leadership
Strategic management
Sales/ external client
Interaction with others
Team leadership
Work competences
Personal attitude
Strategic management
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 18
HOW DOES THE SELF-ASSESSMENT COMPARE TO THE FEEDBACK GIVEN BY OTHEREVALUATORS WITHIN THE COMPETENCES
SELF-ASSESSMENTSELF-ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK FROMFEEDBACK FROMOTHERSOTHERS
difference
1. Personal attitude 0.86
2. Interaction with others 0.45
3. Work competences 0.3
4. Sales/ external client 0.11
5. Team leadership -0.6
6. Strategic management -0.93
Average rating across competences 2.292.29 2.262.26
Those areas where you rated yourself better than others rated you are highlighted in colours. Purple colour indicates those areas where your rating issignificantly different from the rating from others. The intensity of the colour signifies the materiality of the difference on the evaluation scale:
difference in results: less than 25% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 25-50% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 50-75% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: above 75% of the evaluation scale
In addition to the evaluation result, in a colour circle the table also shows the importance assigned to the given item by the evaluated person and theevaluators.
3 4.3 2.14 2.9
2.8 3.6 2.35 3.2
2.5 2.8 2.2 3.1
2.5 3.5 2.39 2.8
1.75 2.5 2.35 3.3
1.2 3.0 2.13 3.1
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 19
FEEDBACK FROM INDIVIDUAL GROUPS OF EVALUATORS
In the next part, you can look at differences between groups of people who evaluated you.
Try to think about why different groups of people perceive you differently and whether it is caused e.g. by different experiencethey have with you, or whether you take a different approach with each of these groups.
It is quite often, but not necessarily always, that the most diverse evaluations (meaning diverse by evaluation scale) are fromsuperiors, who are not afraid to give more extreme answers on both ends of the evaluation scale and who are used to givingevaluation as a routine part of their role. Subordinates usually choose one of the highest values, because they know their superiorswell and are able to appreciate their qualities (once again, does not always apply). For colleagues, it is quite typical that theiranswers are the nearest to the average value and they tend to choose rather careful answers.
The values in the graph show the average for evaluators for a given competence.
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 20
ORDER OF COMPETENCES BY PARTIAL GROUPS OF EVALUATORS
In this chapter of report, you can take a closer look at which of your competences are evaluated better than others by differentgroups of people who evaluated you.
Try to connect the evaluations with specific groups of evaluators and with specific competences. E.g. the most interesting topicsfor your further development in managerial competences can be given to you by subordinates, best inspirations for cooperationand teamwork can be gained from colleagues and inspirations for improvement in sales competences can be given by yourcustomers.
At each group of people who evaluated you, establish a set of priorities, meaning, competences that are the most vital for you,and focus especially on them.
RANKING OF COMPETENCES - COLLEAGUERANKING OF COMPETENCES - COLLEAGUE
1. (average 2.5 ) 3.0 Sales
2. (average 2.38 ) 3.2 General
3. (average 2.29 ) 3.5 Management
4. (average 2.18 ) 2.9 General
5. (average 2.1 ) 2.7 General
6. (average 2.06 ) 3.1 Management
RANKING OF COMPETENCES - MANAGERRANKING OF COMPETENCES - MANAGER
1. (average 2.63 ) 3.1 General
2. (average 2.44 ) 2.1 Sales
3. (average 2.33 ) 3.0 Management
4. (average 2.25 ) 3.0 General
5. (average 2 ) 2.2 General
6. (average 1.75 ) 2.8 Management
RANKING OF COMPETENCES - SUBORDINATERANKING OF COMPETENCES - SUBORDINATE
1. (average 2.48 ) 3.2 Management
2. (average 2.39 ) 3.1 General
3. (average 2.29 ) 2.9 Sales
4. (average 2.26 ) 3.1 Management
5. (average 2.19 ) 3.3 General
6. (average 2.19 ) 3.1 General
Sales/ external client
Interaction with others
Team leadership
Work competences
Personal attitude
Strategic management
Work competences
Sales/ external client
Team leadership
Interaction with others
Personal attitude
Strategic management
Team leadership
Interaction with others
Sales/ external client
Strategic management
Work competences
Personal attitude
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 21
EVALUATOR GROUPS SORTED BY VARIATION OF FEEDBACK
Self-assessment Colleague Manager Subordinate range
1 Strategic management 1.2 2.06 ↓1.751.75 ↑2.262.26 0.51
2 Work competences 2.5 ↓2.182.18 ↑2.632.63 2.19 0.45
3 Sales/ external client 2.5 ↑2.52.5 2.44 ↓2.292.29 0.21
4 Personal attitude 3 2.1 ↓22 ↑2.192.19 0.19
5 Team leadership 1.75 ↓2.292.29 2.33 ↑2.482.48 0.19
6 Interaction with others 2.8 2.38 ↓2.252.25 ↑2.392.39 0.14
average result across competences 2.29 2.25 ↓2.232.23 ↑2.32.3
Note: The arrow pointing down indicates the lowest values; the arrow pointing up indicates the highest values.
difference in results: less than 25% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 25-50% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: 50-75% of the evaluation scaledifference in results: above 75% of the evaluation scale
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 22
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM EVALUATORS
In this chapter of report, you will find comments and recommendations from people who evaluated you.
Please treat them as specific situations how to work on yourself further. However, try to take them more lightly, so they do not hurtyou and keep in mind that those comments are always a reflection of the person who evaluated you. It is always an opinion ofone individual, which can be very useful for you, but which by no means mean automatic commitment to accept it withoutobjections.
If the questionnaire had more categories of recommendations, they are then sorted from summarizing and general ones tospecific ones relating to partial competences or directly to questions. Your own comments have a blue highlight.
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM EVALUATORS RELATING TO THE COMPETENCES COVERED
PERSONAL ATTITUDEPERSONAL ATTITUDE
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
To improve the feedback in relation to subordinate persons and other colleagues, to hand over information more intensely
Delegate tasks which can be performed by someone else.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
If he/she has an different opinion from what is being discussed, he shouldn't wait until he is asked about it. After all, discussionsare here to give room to all opinions.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
Correct behaviour, a people-oriented approach, logical thinking about things.
Keep on thinking out of the box and support the big picture. Continue networking within the company and across the Group.Continue being pragmatic.
Mainly effort and cooperation among departments.
I appreciate the assessed person‘s positive approach to dealing with problems, his effort and ability to understand issuesbeyond his specialisation and make decisions based on that.
WORK COMPETENCESWORK COMPETENCES
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
Become familiar with the business strategy and expectations of the sales network.
Focus more on user needs and help them.
Be more aware that not everyone is an IT type and even when a request is "stupid", it is a problem for the user. Improvecommunication.
Sometimes he seems nervous, like I am disturbing him or something. I recommend slowing down while on the phone.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 23
Reduce complaints about complicated cooperation within the organization, motivate his team more so that they become naturalpartners positively influencing and enriching the process teams in the individual product processes.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
His positive approach generally and especially in relation to difficult issues.
His positive approach to dealing with problems and to communication.
Communication style, responsible and proactive approach
I also think the ability to communicate with suppliers (or 3rd parties in general) is beneficial for everyone involved.
INTERACTION WITH OTHERSINTERACTION WITH OTHERS
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
hand over important information more frequently
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
Search for reasons why something could not be done in the methods and formalities in the buck-passing manner.
Making rushed (half-baked) decisions.
Asking about things which fall under him and not other people.
Try to plan tasks better. Allocate enough time for them, so that the relevant person in the team isn't under too much pressure.
He/she sometimes too dominant – let also the other party excel.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
A proactive approach, structure, orientation at result and quality.
He tries to improve and learns quite fast.
TEAM LEADERSHIPTEAM LEADERSHIP
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
Influence attitudes of the internal support team more so that they become more open-minded to changes and positivecooperation with other teams.
regular work/consultancy meetings with the team
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
Stop smoking before meetings, especially with non-smokers. Shorten cigarette breaks. It takes 5 or 10 minutes tops to smoke acigarette, not 20 or more. It impacts the work of others. Time wasted waiting.
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 24
Leave some decisions to the subordinates.
Not just be forwarding tasks and not helping if needed
Let go of all emotions related to negative feedback.
If he/she has an different opinion from what is being discussed, he shouldn't wait until he is asked about it. After all, discussionsare here to give room to all opinions.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
Excellent cooperation, fast responses, helpful, sees larger context and understands it, quickly finds his bearing in a problem.
I appreciate positive approach, openness, helpfulness, and will to get involved, speed of absorbing new topics, teamwork,meeting deadlines, and prompt responses.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
Understanding the workings of business. Ideally, go visit a dealer and learn to perceive both sides.
Provide feedback about requests and their status proactively.
Improve time management
Better organization of work.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
Greater pro-activity, don't wait to be asked how your team can help
Stop thinking just within the framework of the team, get a more big-picture look. Sometimes the solution can only be seen fromfurther away.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
I always appreciate speedy reactions, indubitable quality, ability to go straigth to the point and find effective solutions toproblems.
I appreciate pleasant cooperation, logical approach to problem-solving, professional demeanour, and structured thinking.
SALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENTSALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENT
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE BEGIN DOING?
When a task consists of multiple sub-tasks, it is sometimes not enough to resolve all these sub-tasks.
To improve the feedback in relation to subordinate persons and other colleagues, to hand over information more intensely
Not to be afraid to make one’s voice heard.
Challenge his colleague‘s opinions (not consider them automatically right);
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 25
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE DISCONTINUE DOING?
Working instead of everyone around him, this only comes back to bite you.
Having little regard for employees' personal complications.
Trying to please everyone.
In meetings, pay more attention to the subject matter instead of the phone or laptop. Or not arrange meetings with zero addedvalue.
Search for reasons why something could not be done in the methods and formalities in the buck-passing manner.
WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?WHAT SHOULD THE EVALUEE CONTINUE DOING?
Detailed knowledge of business processes, products, and systems
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 26
SUMMARY FOR INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS BY COMPETENCESYou will find a summary for all individual evaluated items. Data are shown in charts for for following groups of evaluators in this order. If there is noevaluation by the given group of evaluators in the given question, this group will not be shown. Feedback from others Self-assessment
PERSONAL ATTITUDEPERSONAL ATTITUDE importance
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
Comes up with new ideas and innovations. 3.0 ?
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
WORK COMPETENCESWORK COMPETENCES importance
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
Takes full responsibility for the results of his work. 2.6 4.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with anywork tasks.
3.0 4.0
INTERACTION WITH OTHERSINTERACTION WITH OTHERS importance
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
2.252.25 33
2.432.43 33
2.12.1
1.861.86 1.711.71
1.831.83 33
2.52.5 2.442.44
2.62.6 44
1.711.71 33
2.52.5 22
1.571.57 11
2.222.22 22 22
2.572.57 11
2.222.22 2.42.4 44
2.22.2 33
2.442.44 33
2.332.33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 27
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinionsand strives to reach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
Offers his/her (internal or external) clients solutions to their utmostsatisfaction.
3.7 1.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
TEAM LEADERSHIPTEAM LEADERSHIP importance
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
As a manager, the evaluee is an authority and his/her behavioursets an example to others.
4.2 1.0
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT importance
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/herfield and how to do it.
3.5 4.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the generalaims of the company and the specific steps taken to accomplishthem.
2.6 3.0
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
SALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENTSALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENT importance
2.22.2 44
2.52.5 11
2.172.17 22
2.432.43 2.42.4 44
2.862.86
2.32.3 11
2.632.63
1.41.4 33
2.562.56
2.142.14
2.52.5 22
2.382.38 11
1.171.17 11
2.112.11 22
3.63.6 2.112.11 11
2.432.43 11
1.381.38 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 28
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
2.292.29 1.81.8 33
1.861.86 33
1.831.83 33
2.672.67
2.572.57 33
2.132.13 22
2.672.67
2.832.83 11
3.253.25
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 29
SUMMARY FOR INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS BY COMPETENCES FOR INDIVIDUAL GROUPS OFEVALUATORSYou will find a summary for all individual evaluated items. Data are shown in charts for for following groups of evaluators in this order. If there is noevaluation by the given group of evaluators in the given question, this group will not be shown. Colleague Manager Subordinate Self-assessment
PERSONAL ATTITUDEPERSONAL ATTITUDE importance
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
Comes up with new ideas and innovations. 3.0 ?
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
WORK COMPETENCESWORK COMPETENCES importance
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
2.252.25 22 2.332.33 33
2.332.33 44 22 33
22 22 2.22.2 1.751.75 22 22 11 1.751.75 1.51.5 22 33
22 22 33 33 11 2.252.25
2.252.25 44 2.62.6 44
22 22 1.51.5 33
3.333.33 11 2.252.25 22
11 22 22 11
22 22 2.52.5
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 30
Takes full responsibility for the results of his work. 2.6 4.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with anywork tasks.
3.0 4.0
INTERACTION WITH OTHERSINTERACTION WITH OTHERS importance
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinionsand strives to reach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
Offers his/her (internal or external) clients solutions to their utmostsatisfaction.
3.7 1.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
TEAM LEADERSHIPTEAM LEADERSHIP importance
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
22 22 22
2.672.67 44 22 11
2.332.33 33 22 2.52.5 33 22 44
1.671.67 33 33
22 33 2.752.75 33
2.52.5 2.252.25 1.51.5 2.672.67 44
2.52.5 11 33 11
2.672.67 1.671.67 22
33 33 22 2.52.5 22 2.42.4 44
33 11 3.333.33 1.751.75 33 2.62.6 11
22 44 2.752.75
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 31
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
As a manager, the evaluee is an authority and his/her behavioursets an example to others.
4.2 1.0
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT importance
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/herfield and how to do it.
3.5 4.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the generalaims of the company and the specific steps taken to accomplishthem.
2.6 3.0
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
SALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENTSALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENT importance
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
1.51.5 1.331.33 33
2.752.75 22 2.52.5 33 22 1.751.75 2.332.33 22 33 22
22 2.62.6 11
1.51.5 11 11
1.671.67 33 2.22.2 22
3.333.33 44 2.52.5 22 1.751.75 11
2.332.33 11 33 11
11 11 1.61.6 11
2.332.33 22 2.332.33 22 33 1.41.4 33
11 44 1.751.75 33
2.52.5 1.51.5 33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 32
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
3.333.33 22 2.42.4 22 44 2.52.5 33
2.52.5 11 22 22
33 11 33 3.333.33 11 33 11
33 44 33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 33
importance
SUMMARY FOR INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS BY EVALUATIONYou will find here a summary for all individual evaluated items that are ordered from the best evaluated ones by all evaluators. There are data shown inthese charts for following groups of evaluators in this order: Feedback from others Self-assessment
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
3.63.6 3.253.25
2.862.86
2.832.83 11
2.672.67
2.672.67
2.632.63
2.62.6 44
2.572.57 11
2.572.57 33
2.562.56
2.52.5 22
2.52.5 22
2.52.5 11
2.52.5 2.442.44 33
2.442.44 2.432.43 33
2.432.43 2.432.43 11
2.42.4 44
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 34
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
As a manager, the evaluee is an authority and his/her behavioursets an example to others.
4.2 1.0
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with anywork tasks.
3.0 4.0
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinionsand strives to reach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
Offers his/her (internal or external) clients solutions to their utmostsatisfaction.
3.7 1.0
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aimsof the company and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.6 3.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
Takes full responsibility for the results of his work. 2.6 4.0
Comes up with new ideas and innovations. 3.0 ?
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
2.42.4 44
2.382.38 11
2.332.33 2.32.3 11
2.292.29 2.252.25 33
2.222.22 2.222.22 2.22.2 33
2.22.2 44
2.172.17 22
2.142.14
2.132.13 22
2.112.11 11
2.112.11 22
2.12.1
22 22
1.861.86 1.861.86 33
1.831.83 33
1.831.83 33
1.81.8 33
1.711.71 33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 35
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/herfield and how to do it.
3.5 4.0
1.711.71
1.571.57 11
1.41.4 33
1.381.38 11
1.171.17 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 36
importance
SUMMARY FOR INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS BY EVALUATION FOR INDIVIDUAL GROUPS OFEVALUATORSCOLLEAGUECOLLEAGUEYou will find here a summary for all individual evaluated items that are ordered from the best evaluated ones by all evaluators. There are data shown inthese charts for following groups of evaluators in this order: Colleague Self-assessment
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Offers his/her (internal or external) clients solutions to their utmostsatisfaction.
3.7 1.0
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aimsof the company and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.6 3.0
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
3.333.33
3.333.33 11
3.333.33 3.333.33 22
33 33
33
33
33 33
2.752.75
2.672.67 11
2.672.67 22
2.52.5 2.52.5 11
2.52.5 44
2.52.5 44
2.52.5 11
2.52.5 22
2.52.5 33
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 37
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
Takes full responsibility for the results of his work. 2.6 4.0
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
As a manager, the evaluee is an authority and his/her behavioursets an example to others.
4.2 1.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
Comes up with new ideas and innovations. 3.0 ?
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with anywork tasks.
3.0 4.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/herfield and how to do it.
3.5 4.0
2.332.33 22
2.332.33 33
2.332.33 2.332.33 2.332.33 11
2.252.25 33
2.252.25 44
22 33
22 22
22 22
22 11
22 33
22 22 33
22 33
22
22
1.751.75 11
1.751.75 1.671.67 33
1.671.67 22
1.51.5 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 38
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinionsand strives to reach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
1.51.5 44
1.51.5 33
1.51.5 33
11 33
11 11
11 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 39
importance
MANAGERMANAGERYou will find here a summary for all individual evaluated items that are ordered from the best evaluated ones by all evaluators. There are data shown inthese charts for following groups of evaluators in this order: Manager Self-assessment
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
44 33
44 33
44
44
44 33
44 44
44 11
33 33
33 11
33 33 33 44
33 22
33 33
22
22 11
22 44
22 22
22 22
22 33
22
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 40
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aimsof the company and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.6 3.0
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
22 11
22 22
22 33
22
11 11
11 11
11 22
11
11
11
11 22
11 11 11
11 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 41
importance
SUBORDINATESUBORDINATEYou will find here a summary for all individual evaluated items that are ordered from the best evaluated ones by all evaluators. There are data shown inthese charts for following groups of evaluators in this order: Subordinate Self-assessment
Anticipates and prevents the risks of his decisions. 3.4 ?
Is supportive of his/her subordinates and takes an interest in theirneeds.
3.4 ?
Appreciates the financial impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3.0 2.0
Finishes his/her client meetings by agreeing on specific and clearsteps.
3.2 ?
Seeks to solve problems even when stressed and under pressure. 2.9 ?
Takes interest in the needs of his/her clients (internal or external). 3.4 5.0
The evaluee is an expert in his/her field and can deal with anywork tasks.
3.0 4.0
Emphasises the benefits the client can derive from mutualcooperation or business.
2.8 ?
When signalled by the client, he/she moves from a general offer todiscussing a specific solution.
2.5 5.0
Recognises the strengths and weaknesses of his/her subordinatesand supports them in self-development.
3.3 4.0
Inspires enthusiasm in his/her team members and motivates them toperform at a high level.
3.4 ?
Actively and willingly shares information. 3.3 5.0
When negotiating, the evaluee respects other people’s opinionsand strives to reach mutual agreement.
2.8 2.0
Entrusts the members of his/her team with responsibility and givesthem space to work independently.
3.3 1.0
As a manager, the evaluee is an authority and his/her behavioursets an example to others.
4.2 1.0
The evaluee plans his actions and works systematically. 2.9 2.0
Insists that the people in his/her team or department deliver theirbest performance.
2.6 ?
Seeks solutions, not problems. 2.9 ?
Investigates the client’s needs. 2.7 3.0
Contributes to working relationships and a positive atmosphere. 3.0 5.0
44 3.333.33
33 11
33
33 33 11
33 33
33
33 11
33 22
2.752.75
2.752.75 33
2.672.67 44
2.62.6 11
2.62.6 11
2.62.6 44
2.52.5
2.52.5 2.52.5 33
2.42.4 44
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 42
Carefully notices what the client likes and adapts the businessdialogue accordingly.
2.7 ?
Adheres to agreements and keeps his/her word. 3.4 4.0
Establishes contact with new clients. 2.4 ?
Forms his/her own independent opinion on situations. 2.6 ?
Fulfills his/her tasks by given deadlines. 4.0 3.0
Manages to persuade others using convincing arguments. 2.2 ?
Makes decisions promptly and with perspective. 3.0 4.0
He/she is able to adapt to new situations and circumstancesquickly and easily.
2.5 ?
Finds practical and realistic solutions for his/her tasks. 3.2 1.0
Regards situations conceptually and with perspective. 2.8 ?
Recognises and deals with risks. 3.1 4.0
Is willing to cooperate and involve others. 3.9 ?
Takes full responsibility for the results of his work. 2.6 4.0
Acquires information from different sources in a focused manner. 3.3 2.0
Calmly deals with even very difficult situations. 3.0 5.0
Comes up with new ideas and innovations. 3.0 ?
Offers solutions which accomodate the needs of the client. 3.5 3.0
Actively participates in fulfilling tasks even over and above his/herjob description.
2.3 4.0
Comprehensibly explains to his/her team members the general aimsof the company and the specific steps taken to accomplish them.
2.6 3.0
Is constructive in pointing out things he/she finds satisfactory orunsatisfactory.
2.9 ?
Is interested in how other people perceive his/her work and strivesfor further development.
3.1 ?
Knows how to use the client`s objections in order to persuade them. 3.1 3.0
Offers his/her (internal or external) clients solutions to their utmostsatisfaction.
3.7 1.0
Is supportive of changes leading to improvement in the long term. 3.0 2.0
2.42.4
2.332.33 33
2.332.33 2.252.25 2.252.25 22
2.252.25 2.22.2 22
2.22.2
22 44
22 22 11
22 22 22
22 11
22 33
22 22 22
22 33
1.751.75 11
1.751.75
1.751.75
1.751.75 33
1.671.67 22
1.61.6 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 43
Develops client relationships. 3.0 3.0
When coordinating work, he/she takes the work of others intoaccount.
3.3 2.0
Appears convincing and trustworthy in front of the client. 2.5 4.0
When giving tasks to others, he/she is clear, unambiguous andunderstandable.
3.0 4.0
Has a clear idea of what he/she wants to accomplish in his/herfield and how to do it.
3.5 4.0
1.51.5 33
1.51.5 33
1.41.4 33
1.331.33 33
11 11
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 44
EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOURS WITHIN THE COMPETENCES COVERED
In the final part of report, you can find information about how individual evaluators evaluated individual questions.
Try to focus here, among other things, on specific areas for development in competences (even in a competence that is evaluatedas high in general, there can be a partial question that is perceived as lower and vice versa).
Another interesting information for you can be a match or, the other way around, differences in answers of individual evaluatorson a given scale. E.g. you can see whether an average value of “3” means that everybody evaluated you the same, with score“3”, or whether e.g. some part of evaluators chose the value “2” and a different part of them the value “4”. These details canhelp you to choose your priorities and topics for your further development better and also set specific goals.
PERSONAL ATTITUDEPERSONAL ATTITUDE
ADHERES TO AGREEMENTS AND KEEPS HIS/HER WORD.ADHERES TO AGREEMENTS AND KEEPS HIS/HER WORD.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.25 importance3.4 4.0
Colleague 0 1 1 2 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 1 0 2 1 0Self-assessment
XX
ACTIVELY PARTICIPATES IN FULFILL ING TASKS EVEN OVER AND ABOVE HIS/HER ACTIVELY PARTICIPATES IN FULFILL ING TASKS EVEN OVER AND ABOVE HIS/HER JOB DESCRIPTION.JOB DESCRIPTION.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.43 importance2.3 4.0
Colleague 0 1 1 0 1Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 2 2 0 0 1Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 45
HE/SHE IS ABLE TO ADAPT TO NEW SITUATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES QUICKLY AND EASILY.HE/SHE IS ABLE TO ADAPT TO NEW SITUATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES QUICKLY AND EASILY.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.1 importance2.5 ?
Colleague 0 2 1 0 1Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 2 0 3 0Self-assessment
COMES UP WITH NEW IDEAS AND INNOVATIONS.COMES UP WITH NEW IDEAS AND INNOVATIONS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.86 importance3.0 ?
Colleague 0 2 1 1 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 1 1 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
IS INTERESTED IN HOW OTHER PEOPLE PERCEIVE HIS/HER WORK AND STRIVES FOR FURTHERIS INTERESTED IN HOW OTHER PEOPLE PERCEIVE HIS/HER WORK AND STRIVES FOR FURTHERDEVELOPMENT.DEVELOPMENT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.71 importance3.1 ?
Colleague 0 0 2 0 0Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 0 2 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 46
CALMLY DEALS WITH EVEN VERY DIFFICULT SITUATIONS.CALMLY DEALS WITH EVEN VERY DIFFICULT SITUATIONS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.83 importance3.0 5.0
Colleague 1 1 1 0 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 0 2 0 2 0Self-assessment
XX
SEEKS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS EVEN WHEN STRESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE.SEEKS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS EVEN WHEN STRESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.5 importance2.9 ?
Colleague 1 1 1 1 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 1 0 1 2 1Self-assessment
XX
FORMS HIS/HER OWN INDEPENDENT OPINION ON SITUATIONS.FORMS HIS/HER OWN INDEPENDENT OPINION ON SITUATIONS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.44 importance2.6 ?
Colleague 0 0 1 2 1Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 0 1 1 2 0Self-assessment
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 47
WORK COMPETENCESWORK COMPETENCES
THE EVALUEE PLANS HIS ACTIONS AND WORKS SYSTEMATICALLY.THE EVALUEE PLANS HIS ACTIONS AND WORKS SYSTEMATICALLY.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.6 importance2.9 2.0
Colleague 0 1 1 2 0Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 0 1 0 4 0Self-assessment
XX
WHEN COORDINATING WORK, HE/SHE TAKES THE WORK OF OTHERS INTO ACCOUNT.WHEN COORDINATING WORK, HE/SHE TAKES THE WORK OF OTHERS INTO ACCOUNT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.71 importance3.3 2.0
Colleague 2 0 2 0 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 2 2 0 0Self-assessment
XX
FULFILLS HIS/HER TASKS BY GIVEN DEADLINES.FULFILLS HIS/HER TASKS BY GIVEN DEADLINES.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.5 importance4.0 3.0
Colleague 1 0 0 2 1Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 1 1 2 0 1Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 48
ACQUIRES INFORMATION FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES IN A FOCUSED MANNER.ACQUIRES INFORMATION FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES IN A FOCUSED MANNER.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.57 importance3.3 2.0
Colleague 1 3 0 0 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 2 1 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
SEEKS SOLUTIONS, NOT PROBLEMS.SEEKS SOLUTIONS, NOT PROBLEMS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.22 importance2.9 ?
Colleague 0 0 4 0 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 1 1 1 1 1Self-assessment
TAKES FULL RESPONSIBIL ITY FOR THE RESULTS OF HIS WORK.TAKES FULL RESPONSIBIL ITY FOR THE RESULTS OF HIS WORK.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2 importance2.6 4.0
Colleague 1 1 0 1 0Subordinate 1 1 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 49
RECOGNISES AND DEALS WITH RISKS.RECOGNISES AND DEALS WITH RISKS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.57 importance3.1 4.0
Colleague 1 1 0 1 1Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 2 1 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
REGARDS SITUATIONS CONCEPTUALLY AND WITH PERSPECTIVE.REGARDS SITUATIONS CONCEPTUALLY AND WITH PERSPECTIVE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.22 importance2.8 ?
Colleague 0 1 1 0 1Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 0 1 3 1 0Self-assessment
XX
FINDS PRACTICAL AND REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HIS/HER TASKS.FINDS PRACTICAL AND REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HIS/HER TASKS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.4 importance3.2 1.0
Colleague 1 0 1 1 0Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 2 1 0 1 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 50
THE EVALUEE IS AN EXPERT IN HIS/HER FIELD AND CAN DEAL WITH ANY WORK TASKS.THE EVALUEE IS AN EXPERT IN HIS/HER FIELD AND CAN DEAL WITH ANY WORK TASKS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.2 importance3.0 4.0
Colleague 1 1 2 0 0Subordinate 3 0 0 2 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 51
INTERACTION WITH OTHERSINTERACTION WITH OTHERS
ACTIVELY AND WILL INGLY SHARES INFORMATION.ACTIVELY AND WILL INGLY SHARES INFORMATION.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.44 importance3.3 5.0
Colleague 0 2 0 2 0Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 1 1 1 0 2Self-assessment
XX
MANAGES TO PERSUADE OTHERS USING CONVINCING ARGUMENTS.MANAGES TO PERSUADE OTHERS USING CONVINCING ARGUMENTS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.33 importance2.2 ?
Colleague 1 0 1 1 0Subordinate 1 2 0 1 1Self-assessment
XX
WHEN NEGOTIATING, THE EVALUEE RESPECTS OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS AND STRIVES TO REACHWHEN NEGOTIATING, THE EVALUEE RESPECTS OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS AND STRIVES TO REACHMUTUAL AGREEMENT.MUTUAL AGREEMENT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.2 importance2.8 2.0
Colleague 2 1 1 0 0Subordinate 2 0 1 2 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 52
TAKES INTEREST IN THE NEEDS OF HIS/HER CLIENTS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL).TAKES INTEREST IN THE NEEDS OF HIS/HER CLIENTS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL).
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.5 importance3.4 5.0
Colleague 0 1 1 1 1Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 2 0 1 1 1Self-assessment
XX
OFFERS HIS/HER (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) CLIENTS SOLUTIONS TO THEIR UTMOST SATISFACTION.OFFERS HIS/HER (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) CLIENTS SOLUTIONS TO THEIR UTMOST SATISFACTION.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.17 importance3.7 1.0
Colleague 1 0 1 2 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 2 2 0 1 0Self-assessment
XX
IS WILL ING TO COOPERATE AND INVOLVE OTHERS.IS WILL ING TO COOPERATE AND INVOLVE OTHERS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.43 importance3.9 ?
Colleague 0 0 1 0 1Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 1 0 4 0 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 53
CONTRIBUTES TO WORKING RELATIONSHIPS AND A POSITIVE ATMOSPHERE.CONTRIBUTES TO WORKING RELATIONSHIPS AND A POSITIVE ATMOSPHERE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.4 importance3.0 5.0
Colleague 0 1 1 1 1Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 2 0 2 1Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 54
TEAM LEADERSHIPTEAM LEADERSHIP
IS SUPPORTIVE OF HIS/HER SUBORDINATES AND TAKES AN INTEREST IN THEIR NEEDS.IS SUPPORTIVE OF HIS/HER SUBORDINATES AND TAKES AN INTEREST IN THEIR NEEDS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.86 importance3.4 ?
Colleague 0 0 1 1 1Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 1 0 0 2 1Self-assessment
ENTRUSTS THE MEMBERS OF HIS/HER TEAM WITH RESPONSIBIL ITY AND GIVES THEM SPACE TO WORKENTRUSTS THE MEMBERS OF HIS/HER TEAM WITH RESPONSIBIL ITY AND GIVES THEM SPACE TO WORKINDEPENDENTLY.INDEPENDENTLY.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.3 importance3.3 1.0
Colleague 0 2 1 1 0Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 0 1 1 2 1Self-assessment
XX
INSPIRES ENTHUSIASM IN HIS/HER TEAM MEMBERS AND MOTIVATES THEM TO PERFORM AT A HIGH LEVEL.INSPIRES ENTHUSIASM IN HIS/HER TEAM MEMBERS AND MOTIVATES THEM TO PERFORM AT A HIGH LEVEL.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.63 importance3.4 ?
Colleague 1 1 1 1 0Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 1 1 0 2 1Self-assessment
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 55
WHEN GIVING TASKS TO OTHERS, HE/SHE IS CLEAR, UNAMBIGUOUS AND UNDERSTANDABLE.WHEN GIVING TASKS TO OTHERS, HE/SHE IS CLEAR, UNAMBIGUOUS AND UNDERSTANDABLE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.4 importance3.0 4.0
Colleague 1 1 1 0 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 1 2 1 0 0Self-assessment
XX
INSISTS THAT THE PEOPLE IN HIS/HER TEAM OR DEPARTMENT DELIVER THEIR BEST PERFORMANCE.INSISTS THAT THE PEOPLE IN HIS/HER TEAM OR DEPARTMENT DELIVER THEIR BEST PERFORMANCE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.56 importance2.6 ?
Colleague 0 1 1 0 2Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 1 1 1 1Self-assessment
XX
IS CONSTRUCTIVE IN POINTING OUT THINGS HE/SHE FINDS SATISFACTORY OR UNSATISFACTORY.IS CONSTRUCTIVE IN POINTING OUT THINGS HE/SHE FINDS SATISFACTORY OR UNSATISFACTORY.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.14 importance2.9 ?
Colleague 1 0 1 0 1Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 2 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 56
RECOGNISES THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF HIS/HER SUBORDINATES AND SUPPORTS THEM INRECOGNISES THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF HIS/HER SUBORDINATES AND SUPPORTS THEM INSELF-DEVELOPMENT.SELF-DEVELOPMENT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.5 importance3.3 4.0
Colleague 1 1 1 0 1Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 3 0 0 2 0Self-assessment
XX
AS A MANAGER, THE EVALUEE IS AN AUTHORITY AND HIS/HER BEHAVIOUR SETS AN EXAMPLE TO OTHERS.AS A MANAGER, THE EVALUEE IS AN AUTHORITY AND HIS/HER BEHAVIOUR SETS AN EXAMPLE TO OTHERS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.38 importance4.2 1.0
Colleague 1 2 0 0 1Subordinate 0 0 2 3 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 57
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
HAS A CLEAR IDEA OF WHAT HE/SHE WANTS TO ACCOMPLISH IN HIS/HER FIELD AND HOW TO DO IT.HAS A CLEAR IDEA OF WHAT HE/SHE WANTS TO ACCOMPLISH IN HIS/HER FIELD AND HOW TO DO IT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.17 importance3.5 4.0
Colleague 2 1 1 0 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 1 4 0 0 0Self-assessment
XX
MAKES DECISIONS PROMPTLY AND WITH PERSPECTIVE.MAKES DECISIONS PROMPTLY AND WITH PERSPECTIVE.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.11 importance3.0 4.0
Colleague 0 1 2 0 0Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 0 2 0 3 0Self-assessment
XX
ANTICIPATES AND PREVENTS THE RISKS OF HIS DECISIONS.ANTICIPATES AND PREVENTS THE RISKS OF HIS DECISIONS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 3.6 importance3.4 ?
Colleague 1 0 1 0 2Subordinate 3 0 0 0 2Self-assessment
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 58
COMPREHENSIBLY EXPLAINS TO HIS/HER TEAM MEMBERS THE GENERAL AIMS OF THE COMPANY ANDCOMPREHENSIBLY EXPLAINS TO HIS/HER TEAM MEMBERS THE GENERAL AIMS OF THE COMPANY ANDTHE SPECIFIC STEPS TAKEN TO ACCOMPLISH THEM.THE SPECIFIC STEPS TAKEN TO ACCOMPLISH THEM.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.11 importance2.6 3.0
Colleague 0 0 2 2 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 1 2 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
APPRECIATES THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF HIS/HER ACTIONS AND DECISIONS.APPRECIATES THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF HIS/HER ACTIONS AND DECISIONS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.43 importance3.0 2.0
Colleague 1 0 2 1 0Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 1 0 1 1 1Self-assessment
XX
IS SUPPORTIVE OF CHANGES LEADING TO IMPROVEMENT IN THE LONG TERM.IS SUPPORTIVE OF CHANGES LEADING TO IMPROVEMENT IN THE LONG TERM.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.38 importance3.0 2.0
Colleague 1 2 0 0 0Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 0 4 0 0 1Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 59
SALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENTSALES/ EXTERNAL CLIENT
ESTABLISHES CONTACT WITH NEW CLIENTS.ESTABLISHES CONTACT WITH NEW CLIENTS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.29 importance2.4 ?
Colleague 0 0 2 1 0Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 1 0 2 1 0Self-assessment
XX
APPEARS CONVINCING AND TRUSTWORTHY IN FRONT OF THE CLIENT.APPEARS CONVINCING AND TRUSTWORTHY IN FRONT OF THE CLIENT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.8 importance2.5 4.0
Colleague 0 1 2 1 0Manager 0 0 0 1 0Subordinate 0 4 0 1 0Self-assessment
XX
KNOWS HOW TO USE THE CLIENT`S OBJECTIONS IN ORDER TO PERSUADE THEM.KNOWS HOW TO USE THE CLIENT`S OBJECTIONS IN ORDER TO PERSUADE THEM.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.86 importance3.1 3.0
Colleague 1 2 0 0 0Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 1 2 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 60
DEVELOPS CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS.DEVELOPS CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 1.83 importance3.0 3.0
Colleague 1 0 1 1 0Manager 1 0 0 0 0Subordinate 0 3 0 1 0Self-assessment
XX
CAREFULLY NOTICES WHAT THE CLIENT LIKES AND ADAPTS THE BUSINESS DIALOGUE ACCORDINGLY.CAREFULLY NOTICES WHAT THE CLIENT LIKES AND ADAPTS THE BUSINESS DIALOGUE ACCORDINGLY.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.67 importance2.7 ?
Colleague 1 0 1 0 2Manager 0 0 1 0 0Subordinate 0 1 1 3 0Self-assessment
INVESTIGATES THE CLIENT’S NEEDS.INVESTIGATES THE CLIENT’S NEEDS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.57 importance2.7 3.0
Colleague 1 1 0 1 0Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 1 0 2 2 0Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 61
OFFERS SOLUTIONS WHICH ACCOMODATE THE NEEDS OF THE CLIENT.OFFERS SOLUTIONS WHICH ACCOMODATE THE NEEDS OF THE CLIENT.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.13 importance3.5 3.0
Colleague 0 0 2 2 0Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 1 1 1 1 0Self-assessment
XX
EMPHASISES THE BENEFITS THE CLIENT CAN DERIVE FROM MUTUAL COOPERATION OR BUSINESS.EMPHASISES THE BENEFITS THE CLIENT CAN DERIVE FROM MUTUAL COOPERATION OR BUSINESS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.67 importance2.8 ?
Colleague 0 0 1 1 1Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 3 0 0 2 0Self-assessment
XX
WHEN SIGNALLED BY THE CLIENT, HE/SHE MOVES FROM A GENERAL OFFER TO DISCUSSING A SPECIFICWHEN SIGNALLED BY THE CLIENT, HE/SHE MOVES FROM A GENERAL OFFER TO DISCUSSING A SPECIFICSOLUTION.SOLUTION.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 2.83 importance2.5 5.0
Colleague 1 0 1 0 2Manager 0 1 0 0 0Subordinate 2 0 1 0 1Self-assessment
XX
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 62
FINISHES HIS/HER CLIENT MEETINGS BY AGREEING ON SPECIFIC AND CLEAR STEPS.FINISHES HIS/HER CLIENT MEETINGS BY AGREEING ON SPECIFIC AND CLEAR STEPS.
average evaluation for all evaluators: 3.25 importance3.2 ?
Colleague 1 0 0 1 0Manager 0 0 0 0 1Subordinate 3 0 0 2 0Self-assessment
John Doe - [email protected] confidential
www.tcconline.eu 63