job eval
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
1/15
Methods of Job Evaluation
The Compensation Handbook
Chapter 6
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
2/15
In this session.
Well look at the four major methods used
in job evaluation and the
advantages/disadvantages of eachJob Ranking Method
Job Classification Method
Point MethodFactor Comparison Method
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
3/15
Job Evaluation Methods
Comparison Method Analysis Method
Entire Job Job Factors
Job Against Scale
Job Against Job
Classification Point Method
RankingFactorComparison
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
4/15
Ranking Method
Advantages
Simple
Alternation method ranks
highest then lowest,
then next highest, then
next lowest
Paired comparisons
method picks highest out of
each pair
Fast
Most commonly used
Disadvantages
Comparisons can be
problematic depending on
number and complexity of
jobs
May appear arbitrary to
employees
Can be legally challenged
Unreliable
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
5/15
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
6/15
Factor Comparison Method
Advantages
Customized to theorganization
Relatively easy to useonce its set up
Results in ranking of jobsand a specific dollar value
for each job, based onallocating part of the jobstotal wage to each factor
Disadvantages
Using dollar values maybias evaluators by
assigning more money to afactor than a job is worth
Hard to set up
Not easily explained to
employees Every time wage rates
change, the schedulebecomes obsolete
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
7/15
Point Method
Advantages
Highly stable over time
Perceived as valid byusers and employees
Likely to be reliable
among committee that
assesses the jobs
Provides good data to
prepare a response to an
appeal
Disadvantages
Time, money, and effort
required to set up
Relies heavily on key
(benchmark) jobs, so if
key jobs and correct pay
rates dont exist, the point
method may not be valid
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
8/15
Factor Degrees and Point Systems
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
9/15
What is a Degree Level?
It is a scalethat reflects differing quantity or
quality of the factor
It is used to differentiate jobson the factor
It is a definition that is clear and
unambiguous
It contains explicit language that spel ls out thebehaviors, ski l ls, or performance expectations
for that factor at different levels of the factor
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
10/15
How Do You Develop Degrees?from Otis and Leukarts (1948) Rules
1. Degrees should be selected so that each job falls at only one level.
Note: you can include some degrees that do not apply to the current
jobs if you feel there is too much of a jump between levels. Another
reason to create "empty" levels is if you think new jobs will be
created that will require that level in the factor. The number ofdegrees selected should be no more than are needed to differentiate
adequately and fairly between all the jobs being rated.
2. Each degree should be clearly defined in terms the workers can
understand.
3. Avoid the use of ambiguous terms, e.g., strong skills, excellent.4. Definitions of degrees should be written in objective terms.
5. In writing degree definitions, use examples as much as possible.
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
11/15
How Do You Assign Point
Values to the Entire System?1. The maximum number of points assigned is a fairly
arbitrary judgment (500-3000 is common)2. The number must be large enough to allow sufficient
differentiation among the jobs to be evaluated.3. If there is a very wide spread between the current wages of
the highest paid job and the lowest paid job, the maximumnumber of points will need to be higher
4. If you choose more than one pay system, the number of
points or the actual factors themselves do not have to be thesame in each one.
5. SUGGESTION FOR YOUR PROJECT: Have no fewerthan 1000 points and no more than 2000.
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
12/15
How Do You Assign Point
Values to the Degree Levels? First, determine the number of points for
each main factor(e.g., 2000 total points for
the system would result in 200 points for afactor weighted at 10%). Then use
The straight-line method, which simply takesthe maximum points for a given factor and
divides it by the number of degrees. Note: thismethod assumes that the degrees should beviewed as equidistant from each other
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
13/15
Position: Engineering Manager
Grade: 7
MAXIMUM
FACTOR
POINTS FACTOR JE Points
DEGREE
LEVEL
FACTOR
WEIGHTS
250 Communication & Interpersonal Skills 250 4 10%
250 Education & Training 250 5 10%
500 Problem Solving & Decision Making 400 4 20%500 Responsibility & Accountability 500 4 20%
250 Specialized Knowledge & Application 200 4 10%
250 Supervision & Leadership 250 4 10%
125 Internal Impact 125 3 5%
125 External Impact 75 1 5%
125 Planning & Organizing 125 4 5%125 Innovation 90 2 5%
2500 2265 100%
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
14/15
How Do You Assign Point
Values to the Degree Levels? Orthe accelerating method, where differences in
degrees are seen as greater as you move up in thatfactor, and so the point differences reflect that jump,
e.g., 27, 80, 160, 267, 400 Orthe decelerating method,where differences in
degrees are seen as smaller as you move up in thatfactor, and so the point differences reflect it, e.g., 133,240, 320, 373, 400
Rememberthe highest level of a factor is alwaysassigned the full number of points allocated to thatfactor, and the lowest level of a factor has to have some
points assigned to it, i.e., 0 points is not permitted!
-
7/28/2019 Job Eval
15/15
Whats Next?
In the next class session, well practice
evaluating the ten jobs using the Point
Method Bring with you to class (10) copies of the
Job Evaluation Form on our website, and
the ten Job Analyses with the Factors andWeights you generated for them