jex2007_climateariditythelastomatoidsdistribcockroachaustralia

Upload: jorge-manuel-cardenas-callirgos

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    1/8

    Local climate aridity influences the distribution of

    thelastomatoid nematodes of the Australian giant

    burrowing cockroach

    A. R. JE X1*, M. A. SCHNEIDER2, H. A. ROSE3 andT. H. CRIBB1

    1 School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia2 School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia3 School of Land, Water and Crop Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

    (Received 23 January 2007; revised 25 February 2007; accepted 25 February 2007)

    S U M M A R Y

    In this study, we examined the effects of local climate aridity on the richness and composition of the thelastomatoid

    (Nematoda: Oxyurida) guild parasitizing the Australian giant burrowing cockroach, Macropanesthia rhinoceros (Blattodea:

    Geoscapheinae). In total, 9 thelastomatoid species parasitized this cockroach in north-eastern Australia (Queensland).

    Local observed richness ranged from 3 species (in Cooktown, Magnetic Island, Maiden Springs and Whitsunday Island) to

    7 species (in Rochford Scrub). The lowest richness occurred in both relatively wet and dry climates, and the highest

    richness was in moderate climates. Three species, Cordonicola gibsoni, Leidynemella fusiformis and Travassosinema jaidenae,

    were found at all 13 collection sites. One species, Geoscaphenema megaovum, was found exclusively in dry to moderate

    climates. The remaining species, Blattophila sphaerolaima, Coronostoma australiae, Desmicola ornata, Hammerschmidtiella

    hochi and Jaidenema rhinoceratum, were found in moderate climates only. We hypothesize that the egg is the stage in the

    thelastomatoid life-cycle most vulnerable to the effects of adverse climate and that the geographical distribution for each

    species is, in part, bound by environments that are too dry, resulting in egg desiccation, and by environments that are too

    wet, resulting in decreased oxygen uptake across the egg-shell and in osmotic lysing.

    Key words: Nematoda, Thelastomatidae, guild, distribution, species-richness, climate.

    I N T R O D U C T I O N

    For as long as parasite systems have been studied,

    parasitologists have sought to explain variation in

    the assemblage of species parasitizing different in-

    dividuals within and among host species. Variation in

    parasitic guild structure among host species is surely

    influenced by a range of factors, such as host speci-

    ficity and host ecology. Within a species, however,

    discerning patterns beyond random variation among

    individuals has been as fascinating as it has been

    perplexing. Overarching patterns governing faunal

    variation are rare and universal laws difficult to

    determine (Guegan et al. 2005). Perhaps the most

    consistent patterns, when patterns exist, governing a

    host individuals parasite fauna have been linked to

    the distance decay hypothesis (Poulin and Morand,

    1999; Morand and Guegan, 2000; Poulin, 2003) and

    the latitudinal gradient hypothesis (Rohde, 1993;

    Poulin, 1998b). The distance decay hypothesis,

    in relation to parasite systems, predicts that the

    similarity in the make-up of the parasite fauna

    of conspecific host populations will decrease with an

    increase in the geographical distance between them

    (Poulin and Morand, 1999). The latitudinal gradient

    hypothesis is directed more specifically at overallspecies richness of the assemblage parasitizing a

    given host and is based on the observation, both in

    parasite and non-parasite systems, that species rich-

    ness is higher in ecosystems closer to the equator than

    in those closer to the poles (Hawkins et al. 2003).

    However, these patterns do not necessarily apply

    to all systems (Kennedy et al. 1991; Brown, 1995;

    Rosenzweig, 1995) and, although they have been

    used successfully in some systems occurring over

    large geographical areas, the utility of distance decay

    and latitudinal gradients across smaller geographical

    ranges or, in the case of the latitudinal gradienthypothesis, longitudinally broad rather than lati-

    tudinally long ranges, is perhaps somewhat limited.

    A major obstacle in defining non-random patterns in

    parasite systems is the remarkable array of parasitic

    behaviours and life-cycles. Perhaps a more targeted

    approach of searching for non-random patterns in

    more specific systems in which there are fewer con-

    founding obstacles, such as intermediate hosts, will

    provide a simpler system for investigations leading to

    additional discernment of useful patterns in the

    variation of parasite assemblages.

    For any parasite, one of the most dangerous

    periods of its life-cycle is the time during which it

    must exist outside of its host. Multi-host life-cycles,

    * Corresponding author: Department of VeterinaryScience, The University of Melbourne, Werribee,Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

    1

    Parasitology, Page 1 of 8. f 2007 Cambridge University Press

    doi:10.1017/S0031182007002727 Printed in the United Kingdom

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    2/8

    such as those found in many platyhelminths and

    protists, represent a common adaptation which

    helps overcome this danger by allowing life-cycle

    stages to shelter in intermediate hosts. Many para-

    sites, such as the oxyurid nematodes (pinworms),

    do not have intermediate hosts, and thus have direct

    modes of transmission.

    In pinworm systems, females produce eggs whichare shed in the hosts faeces and must survive in

    the external environment long enough to be ingested

    by a new host (Adamson, 1984). Numerous studies

    have suggested that oxyurid eggs are sensitive to

    environmental conditions, particularly moisture

    (Geller, 1944; Anya, 1966; Adamson, 1989; Grice

    and Prociv, 1993). Geller (1944) showed that eggs

    of the human pinworm, Enterobius vermicularis, re-

    quired humidity levels ofy100% to develop. Similar

    requirements were observed by Skrjabin et al. (1960)

    for the horse pinworm, Oxyuris equi. Grice and

    Prociv (1993) demonstrated that eggs of the rat pin-worm, Syphacia obvelata, collapsed if exposed to

    conditions that were too dry and ruptured or opened

    prematurely in excessive moisture. However, these

    responses are not universal; levels of susceptibility

    vary among species (McSorley, 2003), suggesting

    that some species are more or less suited than

    others to the external environment across a range of

    climates. From these findings, it can be predicted

    that the pinworm fauna of widely distributed hosts

    varies in response to different local climatic con-

    ditions. There is presently little information avail-

    able to test this hypothesis.

    Macropanesthia rhinoceros (Blattodea : Geosca-pheinae) has an unusually wide geographical distri-

    bution relative to the other burrowing cockroaches

    (Roth, 1977; Walker et al. 1994). Jex et al. (2006)

    reported the thelastomatoid fauna of this species

    from a number of localities across Queensland,

    Australia. Here, we extend this previous study and

    examine in detail the relationship between local

    climate and the observed and estimated richness and

    overall composition of the thelastomatoid guilds

    parasitizing this host species. We test for patterns in

    thelastomatoid distribution both at the individual

    species and the guild levels. Additionally, we exam-ine ecological and physiological characteristics which

    may explain these distribution patterns.

    M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S

    Data collection

    Specimens of Macropanesthia rhinoceros (n=114)

    were collected from 13 localities across Queensland,

    Australia, over y20 years. All cockroach specimens

    were preserved in 70% ethanol, where they remained

    until recent dissection. A transverse incision was

    made along the posterior end of the abdomen. The

    hindgut was then teased out and severed at the point

    immediately anterior to the origin of the Malpighian

    tubules. The excised hindgut was dissected, and all

    nematodes found were extracted and preserved in

    fresh 70% ethanol. Preserved nematodes were placed

    in a (v/v) solution of 100% glycerol in 100% ethanol

    to a final concentration of 5% glycerol and 95%

    ethanol. These were left uncovered for 48 h to allow

    the ethanol to evaporate, thereby leaving thespecimens in 100% glycerol. This was done to limit

    any damage to the worms caused by rapid transfer to

    pure glycerol. The nematodes were mounted in

    glycerol using the wax-ring method described by

    Hunt (2002). All nematodes were identified using a

    morphological character database compiled from the

    literature as described by Jex et al. (2005).

    Climate comparisons

    Relative aridity was calculated using Budykos

    Aridity Index (h) (Budyko, 1974). We used theequation as defined by Arora (2002): h=P/PE, where

    P is annual precipitation and PE is annual potential

    evapotranspiration. We employed areal potential

    evapotranspiration, which is defined as the evapo-

    transpiration that would take place, if there is un-

    limited water supply, from an area large enough such

    that the effects of any upwind boundary transitions

    are negligible, and local variations are integrated to

    an areal average. This was done to limit the impact

    of micro-climate variation at individual localities.

    All climate and potential evapotranspiration data

    were provided by the Bureau of Meteorology,Victoria, Australia ([email protected]).

    Estimation of species richness and non-linear

    regression analysis

    Species richness estimates were calculated using

    the software package EstimateS v.7.0 (available at

    http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates). Although

    this software package provides many species richness

    estimators, only Bootstrap (Smith and van Belle,

    1984), Chao2 (Chao, 1987) and Jack1 (Burnham

    and Overton, 1978, 1979; Heltshe and Forrester,

    1983; Smith and van Belle, 1984) were used, as

    recommended by Walther and Morand (1998) and

    Poulin (1998 a). Richness estimation values were

    calculated over 1000 runs, using a randomized

    dataset for each run. Trend analysis was performed

    using the software package Statistica Kernel release

    5.1 (available at www.statsoft.com). Trend lines were

    fitted using the least squares method.

    Egg morphometrics

    The eggs were measured (at 400r magnification)

    using an ocular micrometre employing an Olympus

    BH-2 light compound microscope. Egg length

    A. R. Jex and others 2

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    3/8

    and width were measured from the longest and

    widest portion of each egg. Egg volume was esti-mated by calculating the volume of an ellipsoid of

    the same dimensions (=4/3p* polar radius * equa-

    torial radius2 ; where polar radius is one half of the

    total egg length, and equatorial radius is one half of

    the total egg width). Egg surface area was estimated

    as the surface area of an ellipsoid of the same

    dimensions (=2p* equatorial radius2

    * (1+(polar

    radius/equatorial radius)* arcsin(e)/e), where e=

    eccentricity and is calculated as e=(1x(polar

    radius2/equatorial radius2))1/2).

    R E S U L T S

    We examined 114 adult M. rhinoceros from 13

    localities in Queensland, Australia (Fig. 1). These

    localities represent the known distribution for

    M. rhinoceros (see Roth, 1977 and Walker etal. 1994).

    We identified 9 species of Thelastomatoidea. The

    prevalences of infection for the species at each site

    ranged from 9 to 100%, with the lower figure rep-

    resenting a single infection (Table 1). Abundance

    and intensity values were not considered here.

    Observed species richness ranged from 3 species,

    at Cooktown, Magnetic Island, Maiden Springs and

    Whitsunday Islands, to 7 species at Rochford Scrub

    (Table 2). Estimated species richness ranged from 3

    species at Cooktown, Magnetic Island, Maiden

    Springs and Whitsunday Islands, to 8, 12 and 10 at

    Rochford Scrub for the estimators Bootstrap, Chao2

    and Jack1, respectively. All 9 species were never

    found at a single locality.

    Localities were ranked by Budykos aridity index

    (Table 2). The aridity index ranged from 0.29

    for Maiden Springs (driest locality) to 0.94 forCooktown (wettest locality). Trend analysis using

    the least squares fitting method suggested a strong

    curvilinear relationship between species richness

    and climate aridity (Fig. 2). Only the comparison

    between observed richness and aridity is shown.

    However, comparisons between estimated richness

    and aridity revealed a similar trend, regardless of the

    estimation method used.

    Overall fecundity, as measured by number of

    eggs in utero, ranged from a mean of 90 per female

    for Hammerschmidtiella hochi to just 1 per female

    for Geoscaphenema megaovum (Table 3). Egg volumeranged from 0.19 pl (L. fusiformis) to 2.23 pl

    (G. megaovum). Egg surface area ranged from 6 nm2

    (T. jaidenae) to 24 nm2 (G. megaovum). Egg shell

    thickness ranged from 0.95 mm (B. sphaerolaima) to

    4.37 mm (G. megaovum). We compared the climate

    range, as indicated by Budykos aridity index, for

    each thelastomatoid species with these 3 parameters

    (Fig. 3); the findings of which are discussed in detail

    in the following section on egg morphology.

    D I S C U S S I O N

    Species richness

    For all localities examined, except Rochford Scrub

    and Mount Garnet, estimated richness was within

    2 species of observed richness, suggesting that a

    high proportion of the thelastomatoid species in-

    fecting M. rhinoceros at these localities have been

    found. Rochford Scrub and Mount Garnet had ob-

    served species richness levels of 6 and 7, respectively

    (Bootstrap=8 and 7, Chao2=11 and 12, and

    Jack1=10 and 10, respectively). These localities

    were highly species rich and all included several

    species found in only a single cockroach individual;C. australiae, G. megaovum and J. rhinoceratum

    at Rochford Scrub and L. fusiformis, C. australiae,

    G. megaovum and D. ornata at Mt. Garnet. It is

    rare species (particularly singletons or doubletons)

    which relate to estimated richness levels that are

    greater than observed species richness. This effect is

    exacerbated for smaller sample sizes. Walther and

    Morand (1998) indicated that the Chao2 and Jack1

    estimation methods performed best and should be

    used in studies of parasite species richness. The

    present data appear to agree with this observation. In

    most localities for which estimated richness differed

    from the observed richness, the Bootstrap based

    richness estimates were consistently lower than those

    3

    4

    5

    11

    102

    7 9

    128

    13

    16

    Fig. 1. Map of the sampling sites for Macropanesthia

    rhinoceros in Queensland, Australia. Alpha (1),

    Boonderoo (2), Coen (3), Cooktown (4), Dimbulah (5),

    Duaringa (6), Gumlu (7), Granite Gorge (8), Magnetic

    Island (9), Maiden Springs (10), Mt Garnet (11),

    Rochford Scrub (12), Whitsunday Island (13).

    Climate aridity effects on thelastomatoid nematode distribution 3

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    4/8

    predicted by Chao2 or Jack1, with the exceptionof the dataset for the locality Duaringa, where

    Bootstrap was slightly higher than Chao2 (4.42 vs.

    4.33). In addition, in most of these localities, the

    differences between Chao2- and Jack1-based rich-

    ness estimates were less than the differences between

    the values calculated via either of these estimators

    as well as those calculated using the Bootstrap

    method. The exceptions to this apparent trend were

    Rochford Scrub and Mount Garnet, the 2 localities

    with the highest richness levels or, perhaps more

    importantly, the greatest number of singletons. It

    may be that in systems with a high number of

    singletons, the Chao2 method overestimates richness

    levels. We take the view here that there may be

    species that we have not detected in some localitiesand, therefore, all subsequent analyses of the data

    were repeated for observed richness and the 3 rich-

    ness estimators. In either case, Coen, Mt. Garnet and

    Rochford Scrub are clearly the most species-rich of

    the sites surveyed; any uncertainty about their true

    richness is unlikely to have a negative impact/effect

    on the subsequent analysis.

    Distribution of thelastomatoids by local climate

    Macropanesthia rhinoceros is found in some of

    the driest to some of the wettest areas of Australia.

    There appears to be a clear relationship between

    thelastomatoid guild richness and local climate

    Table 2. Observed and estimated thelastomatoid species richness, climate variables, Budykos aridity

    index by locality for Macropanesthia rhinoceros in Queensland, Australia

    (Precipitation (Prec), average areal potential evapotranspiration (AAPE), Budykos aridity (BA), observed species richness(Obs), bootstrap based richness estimation (Boot), Chao2 based richness estimation (Chao2) and Jack1 based richnessestimation (Jack1).)

    LocalityPrec(mm)

    AAPE(mm) BA Obs Boot Chao2 Jack1

    Maiden Springs 475 1635 0.29 3 3 3 3Boonderoo 491 1617 0.31 4 5 6 6

    Alpha 498 1549 0.32 4 4 4 4Dimbulah 723 1694 0.43 5 6 7 7Coen 900 1906 0.47 6 7 7 8Rochford 825 1715 0.48 7 8 12 10Mount Garnet 900 1758 0.51 6 7 11 10Duaringa 820 1500 0.55 4 4 4 4Granite Gorge 860 1500 0.57 5 6 7 7Gumlu 1058 1835 0.58 4 4 5 5Magnetic Island 1169 1800 0.65 3 3 3 3Whitsunday Island 1776 1988 0.89 3 3 3 3Cooktown 1809 1919 0.94 3 3 3 3

    Table 1. Prevalence of infection for each thelastomatoid species parasitizing Macropanesthia rhinoceros in

    Queensland, Australia

    (Localities ranked by decreasing aridity. Cordonicola gibsoni (Cg), Leidynemella fusiformis (Lf), Travassosinema jaidenae(Tj), Geoscaphenema megaovum (Gm), Coronostoma australiae (Ca), Jaidenema rhinoceratum (Jr), Desmicola ornata (Do),Blattophila sphaerolaima (Bs) and Hammerschmidtiella hochi (Hh).)

    Locality n Cg Lf Tj Gm Ca Jr Do Bs Hh

    Maiden Springs 7 86 43 57 Boonderoo 9 56 33 11 11 Alpha 8 100 75 63 50 Dimbulah 10 100 80 50 10 10 Coen 6 67 100 33 83 17 17Rochford Scrub 11 100 73 64 9 9 9 27 Mt. Garnet 10 90 10 20 10 10 10 Duaringa 6 100 33 100 17 Granite Gorge 10 90 30 90 10 10 Gumlu 6 83 83 50 17 Magnetic Island 10 100 30 100 Whitsunday

    Island10 100 60 70

    Cooktown 11 73 64 55

    A. R. Jex and others 4

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    5/8

    aridity. Wet localities, such as Cooktown (observed

    species: 3), Whitsunday Island (3) and Magnetic

    Island (3) and dry localities, such as Alpha (4),

    Boonderoo (4) and Maiden Springs (3) have lower

    species richnesses than mid-range localities, such

    as Coen (6), Mt. Garnet (6) and Rochford Scrub (7).

    Importantly, the relationships between guild

    richness and climate aridity correspond to realspecies not just numerical variations in richness

    statistics. Three species of thelastomatoid, C. gibsoni,

    L. fusiformis and T. jaidenae, were found at all

    localities. Geoscaphenema megaovum was found

    in all localities with a dry climate, except Maiden

    Springs, and was not found in the 6 wettest sites.

    The other 5 species were all found only in mid-range

    aridity sites; none was found in any of the 3 wettest

    or the 3 driest sites.

    Egg morphology

    The survival of any parasite species depends upon itsability to successfully infect new hosts. Successful

    infection is certainly improved by maximizing the

    number of host encounters. In parasites with direct

    life-cycles, the number of encounters can be in-

    creased by increasing egg longevity, maximizing the

    time over which an encounter may occur or, by in-

    creasing fecundity, allowing greater frequency of

    host encounters by weight of numbers. Clearly, cli-

    mate may have an effect on egg longevity when eggs

    are shed into the environment. Conversely, it seems

    unlikely that climate directly impacts fecundity.

    Certainly, any impact that climate may have on

    fecundity will be indirect and exceedingly difficult to

    predict.

    We propose that egg longevity varies from site to

    site, largely due to the climatic conditions en-

    countered. Based on previous studies (Geller, 1944;

    Anya, 1966; Adamson, 1989; Grice and Prociv,

    1993), we predict that in dry climates desiccation is

    the greatest threat to egg longevity and that in wet

    climates it is threatened by osmotic lysing and egg

    suffocation in water-logged soils. We hypothesizethat, under these circumstances, the most likely

    indicators of egg longevity in response to environ-

    mental stress will be egg surface-area to volume

    ratios and egg-shell thickness. Presumably, eggs with

    lower surface area to volume ratios (i.e. large eggs)

    will be less susceptible to desiccation. Also, we pre-

    dict that eggs with thick shells will be less susceptible

    to desiccation and, hence, more successful in dry

    environments.

    A comparison of the egg characteristics from the

    9 species examined suggests that there is some

    correlation with the climate-related distributionsof these species. Three species, Cordonicola gibsoni,

    Leidynemella fusiformis and Travassosinema jaidenae,

    were reported from all localities surveyed and had

    by far the broadest climate ranges. An examination

    of the egg characteristics of these 3 species relative to

    all others showed that they were in the mid-range in

    most respects. The mean numbers of eggs in utero

    for these species were 8 (L. fusiformis), 11 (C. gibsoni)

    and 13 (T. jaidenae). Two species, G. megaovum

    (1 egg) and J. rhinoceratum (5), had fewer eggs

    in utero, and the other 4 species, D. ornata (15),

    C. australiae (24), B. sphaerolaima (40) and H. hochi

    (90) had more. Egg surface area to volume ratioswere 14.2 nm2/pl for C. gibsoni, 16.7 nm2/pl for

    T. jaidenae and 55.1 nm2/pl for L. fusiformis. With the

    exception of L. fusiformis, these had also mid-range

    levels. Three species, G. megaovum (10.8 nm2/pl),

    Jaidenema rhinoceratum (11.8 nm2/pl) and C. aus-

    traliae (12.5 nm2/pl), had lower surface area to

    volume ratios and 3 other species, Desmicola ornata

    (17.4 nm2/pl), B. sphaerolaima (33.4 nm2/pl) and

    H. hochi (37.2 nm2/pl) had higher ratios. All 3

    common species had an approximately mid-range

    shell thickness; 1.56 mm, 1.78 mm and 2.62 mm thick

    for C. gibsoni, L. fusiformis and T. jaidenae eggs,respectively. Two species, H. hochi (1.25 mm) and

    B. sphaerolaima (0.95 mm), had thinner shells,

    1 species, J. rhinoceratum (1.64 mm) had similar

    shell thickness and 3 species, D. ornata (2.76 mm),

    C. australiae (3.10 mm) and G. megaovum (4.37 mm),

    had thicker shells.

    Overall, the eggs of the 3 dominant species are

    unremarkable in comparison with the other 6

    species examined here. We suspect that the un-

    remarkable morphology and morphometrics of the

    eggs for these dominant species is precisely what

    permits them to be so widespread. By producing eggs

    of moderate size (with the exception of L. fusiformis),

    shell thickness and number, the 3 dominant species

    75

    65

    55

    45

    35

    25

    02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

    CKWI

    GG

    Du Gu

    MGCo

    RS

    Di

    BoAI

    MS MIObservedspeciesrichness

    Budyko's aridity

    Fig. 2. Non-linear regression analysis of observed species

    richness versus relative aridity for Macropanesthia

    rhinoceros by locality in Queensland, Australia. Locality

    (2); Alpha (Al), Boonderoo (Bo), Coen (Co), Cooktown

    (Ck), Dimbulah (Di), Duaringa (Du), Granite Gorge

    (GG), Gumlu (Gu), Magnetic Island (MI), Maiden

    Springs (MS), Mount Garnet (MG), Rochford Scrub(RS), Whitsunday Island (WI). (Note: Although not

    included here, analysis using estimated richness,

    regardless of the estimation method used, produces a

    similar trend.)

    Climate aridity effects on thelastomatoid nematode distribution 5

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    6/8

    may represent a generalist compromise that allows

    them to survive in a broad range of climatic con-

    ditions.Eggs of Geoscaphenema megaovum are the largest

    and have the thickest shells of any of the thelasto-

    matoids reported here. In addition, this species

    never had more than 1 egg in utero. This species was

    found in all of the dry localities, except Maiden

    Springs. Conversely, it was not found in any of

    the wet localities. In fact, although we found a

    number of cockroach species harbouring this para-

    site across large geographical areas within Australia,

    we have yet to find it in a wet locality (Jex etal. 2007).

    These distributional data and the combination of

    large egg size and thick shell for this species suggest

    that G. megaovum is an arid climate specialist.Coronostoma australiae and J. rhinoceratum also

    have large, thick-shelled eggs and broad distri-

    butions across most arid localities and no wet

    localities for M. rhinoceros. Jaidenema rhinoceratum

    may also be an arid climate specialist as it has also

    been found in many cockroach species in Australia

    but not in wet localities (Jex et al. 2007). However,

    although not found in any wet climates in this study,

    C. australiae has been reported previously from

    another cockroach species, Panesthia tryoni tryoni,

    from a particularly wet locality, Lamington National

    Park, Queensland (Jex et al. 2005). Therefore, wecannot consider this species to be an arid specialist,

    although it is apparently more successful in arid

    regions. None of the species reported here could be

    considered a wet climate specialist based on the

    present data.

    Overall, we showed that the thelastomatoid fauna

    of M. rhinoceros, across its entire range, is hetero-

    geneous. The variation in the fauna appears to be

    correlated to local climate aridity and some of this

    variation appears to be ascribable to egg morphology.

    However, inconsistencies between egg surface area to

    volume ratio, thickness of egg-shell and width of

    climate range presented by the 3 dominant thelasto-

    matoids, C. gibsoni, L. fusiformis and T. jaidenae,

    Table 3. Mean number of eggs in utero and egg morphometrics for each thelastomatoid species

    parasitizing Macropanesthia rhinoceros

    Parasite speciesEggsin utero

    Egglength(mm)

    Eggwidth(mm)

    Shellthickness(mm)

    Surfacearea( nm2)

    Volume(pl)

    Surfacearea:Volume

    Cordonicola gibsoni 11 82 50 1.56 12 0.86 14 200

    Leidynemella fusiformis 8 71 25 1.78 10 0.19 55 100Travassosinema jaidenae 13 57 38 2.62 6 0.34 16 700Geoscaphenema megaovum 1 115 68 4.37 24 2.23 10 800Coronostoma australiae 24 100 59 3.1 18 1.46 12 500

    Jaidenema rhinoceratum 5 84 55 1.64 13 1.06 11 800Desmicola ornata 15 83 46 2.76 13 0.74 17 400Blattophila sphaerolaima 40 91 36 0.95 16 0.49 33 400Hammerschmidtiella hochi 90 67 29 1.25 9 0.24 37 200

    A

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    Budyko's aridity

    Eggsinutero

    C. gibsoni

    L. fusiformis

    T. jaidenae

    G. megaovum

    C. australiae

    J. rhinocerata

    D. ornata

    B. sphaerolaima

    H. hochi

    B

    9500

    14500

    19500

    24500

    29500

    34500

    39500

    44500

    4950054500

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    Budyko's aridity

    Eggsurfaceareatovolum

    e C. gibsoni

    L. fusiformis

    T. jaidenae

    G. megaovum

    C. australiae

    J. rhinocerata

    D. ornata

    B. sphaerolaima

    H. hochi

    C

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    Budyko's aridity

    Eggshellthickness

    C. gibsoni

    L. fusiformis

    T. jaidenae

    G. megaovum

    C. australiae

    J. rhinocerata

    D. ornata

    B. sphaerolaima

    H. hochi

    Fig. 3. Comparison of climate range with egg

    characteristics for each Thelastomatoidea species

    parasitizingMacropanesthia rhinoceros

    acrossQueensland, Australia; eggs in utero. (A) Egg surface area

    to volume ratio; (B) egg-shell thickness (C).

    A. R. Jex and others 6

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    7/8

  • 7/30/2019 Jex2007_ClimateAridityThelastomatoidsDistribCockroachAustralia

    8/8

    Poulin, R. and Morand, S. (1999). Geographical

    distances and the similarity among parasite communities

    of conspecific host populations. Parasitology 119,

    369374.

    Rohde, K. (1993). Ecology of Marine Parasites, CAB

    International, Wallingford, UK.

    Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995). Species Diversity in Space and

    Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Roth, L. M. (1977). A taxonomic revision of the

    Panesthiinae of the world I : The Panesthiinae of

    Australia (Dictyoptera: Blattodea: Blaberidae).

    Australian Journal of Zoology (Supplementary Series

    No.) 48, 1112.

    Skrjabin, K. I., Schikhobalova, N. P. and

    Lagodovskaya, E. A. (1960). Oxyurata of Animals and

    Man; Part 1, Translated from Russian by the Israel

    Program of Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.

    Smith, E. P. and van Belle, G. (1984). Nonparametric

    estimation of species richness. Biometrics 40, 119129.

    Walker, J. A., Rugg, D. and Rose, H. A. (1994). Nine

    new species of Geoscapheinae (Blattodea: Blaberidae)

    from Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 35,

    263284.

    Walther, B. A. and Morand, S. (1998). Comparative

    performance of species richness estimation methods.

    Parasitology 116, 395405.

    A. R. Jex and others 8