jersey future hospital - government of jersey and wellbeing... · 8 conclusion ... basement - the...

JERSEY FUTURE HOSPITAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADDENDUM

DATE 24th July 2018

Environmental Impact Statement Addendum 1-1

Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1

2 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES TO PLANNING APPLICATION .................................. 1

3 SCOPE OF EISA ......................................................................................................... 4

4 HERITAGE .................................................................................................................. 5

5 WASTE ........................................................................................................................ 6

6 TOWNSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ........................................................................ 7

7 CORRECTIONS TO ERRORS IN EIS NOISE AND VIBRATION CHAPTER ............ 13

8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................... 14

APPENDIX A ...................................................................................................................... 15

Environmental Impact Statement Addendum 1

1 Introduction

1.1 The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Jersey Future Hospital was

submitted in support of planning application PP/2018/0507 on 13th April 2018. Since this

time, a number of changes to the parameter envelope and design principles submitted

have been introduced which results in the need to provide additional information for

consideration alongside the submitted application.

1.2 This Environmental Impact Statement Addendum (ESIA) sets out what these changes

are, identifying whether this results in any changes to the assessment outcomes. It

should be read in conjunction with the original EIS that was submitted alongside the

planning application PP/2018/0507.

1.3 The Planning and Building (Environmental Impact) (Jersey) Order 2006 does not make

provisions for providing additional information and updating the EIS prior to planning

decisions being made. In this instance therefore, in line with best practice, the procedure

required under the UK Town and Country (Environmental Impact Assessment)

Regulations 2017 have been followed which set out in Part 5 (25) how further information

or evidence should be provided and publicised.

2 Description of changes to planning application

2.1 The changes to the design result from revision to the parameter envelope and as a result

of the design principles that were submitted in July 2018. These are described in Table

2-1 along with a brief justification for this change. These design changes are also

updated within the Design and Access Statement which has also been resubmitted in

July 2018.

2.2 The proposed amendments do not change the quantum of development or the phasing

of development.

Table 2-1 Design changes

Design Change Justification

Main Building, Block B - The roofline

edge of the JFH ward block elements

(Volume B2) where adjacent to the rear of

the Granite Block has been reduced in

height by 2m (to 32m).

The reduction in height allows for a more

gradual increase in height between the

Granite Block and Block B. When viewed from

the opposite side of Gloucester Street (eastern

side), less than a full floor height is now visible



above the Granite Block parapet (17.20

datum).

Basement - The current layouts utilise

60% of the basement area shown within

the parameter plan PL101 S2P06.

In order to calculate the volume of waste

materials that would be generated from

excavation of the basement it has been

assumed that 60% of the basement area is

developable. This represents 7,500m2.

Westaway Court – the height of this

building has been modified so that the

block fronting Elizabeth Place has

increased in height to 13.20m (from

12.90m) and the block fronting Savile

Street has increased in maximum height

to 9.00m (from 8.70m) with a slightly lower

frontage facing Savile Street 5.60m. The

overall footprint remains the same.

Reductions in frontage height were sought to

lessen the visual effect experienced along

Savile Street and Elizabeth Place.

Transport proposals – a number of

minor changes to the transport proposals

include:

2.3 The changes to the transport and access

proposals have been made for the following

reasons:

Optimisation of the internal areas and

clinical adjacencies;

Reinforcement of a clear and legible

circulation diagram, achieving grade

separation between ground floors staff

focused areas and first floor public areas

with the hospital; and

External benefits including the provision of

additional “active frontage” on Kensington

Place.

2.4

Phase 1B

Proposed service block has been

relocated from the north of Patriotic

Street MSCP to the southwest of The

Parade behind St Elmos and Edward

Place.

Hearse bay for the mortuary is

proposed adjacent to the Newgate

Street/ Kensington Place junction

Kensington Place is kept one-way

between the junctions with Newgate

Street (extended) and Kensington

Street



Pedestrian access from Kensington

Place in to Block A has been removed

Phase 2 Final State

Drop-off facility on The Parade is

reduce in size and Patient Transport

Services will use an extended layby

on Newgate Street.

2.5 In addition, a couple of errors were identified in the EIS Chapter 6 (Noise and Vibration).

These are identified and rectified in Section 7 of this EIS Addendum.

EIS Figure updates

2.6 All parameter plans have been updated and resubmitted for consideration with the

planning application. The changes that have been made to the parameter plans are

listed in Appendix A of this EISA. Some of the Figures that were submitted as Volume

III of the ESIA in April 2018 were copies of the parameter plans, therefore these Figures

have also required updating as have Figures relating to the transport assessment and

the revised visualisations which have been needed following the design changes post

April 2018.

2.7 The EIS Figures which have been updated are listed below and are included in Appendix

A. Where these relate to updated parameter plans these are also identified (in brackets):

Figure 3.1 – Building Heights Parameter Plan (PL103-S2.P06);

Figure 3.2 – Building Frontages Parameter Plan (PL102-S2.P06);

Figure 3.3 Ground Floor, Public Realm and Pedestrians Parameter Plan (JFH-

HSL-M1-ZZ-DR-A-PL104-S2.P06)

Figure 3.4 Phasing Plan Parameter Plan - (JFH-HSL-M1-ZZ-DR-A-PL106-

S2.P05);

Figure 7.1 Phase 1A Overview of Proposals

Figure 7.2 Phase 1B Overview of Proposals


Figure 7.3 Phase 2 Overview of Proposals

Figure 15.5 - Photosheets_150dpi_1 of 2

Figure 15.5 - Photosheets_150dpi_2 of 2

3 Scope of EISA

3.1 The changes that have been proposed have been reviewed and topic specialists have

identified whether there is a potential for these changes to result in changes to their

original findings as set out in Chapters 5-16 of the EIS. This is summarised in Table X

below and where changes to assessment outcomes were identified as likely, further

assessment has been carried out and reported.

Table 3-1 EISA scope

EIS Topic Scoped

into

EISA?

Justification

Air quality x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS.

Noise & vibration x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS

Traffic x A Transport Technical Note has been prepared to be

submitted with the updated design details. This reports on

the changes to the design as they relate to transport issues

and confirms that there are no anticipated changes to the

Traffic Impact Assessment / construction routing.

Therefore, the changes do not alter the findings from the

EIS.

Biodiversity x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS

Geology,

hydrogeology and

contamination

x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS

Water resources x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS


EIS Topic Scoped

into

EISA?

Justification

Heritage The reduction in height of certain elements of Block B and

Westaway requires reassessment of the views afforded to

and from heritage assets.

Waste The proposed design changes, in particular the

confirmation of the main building basement layout requires

the volume of excavated waste to be assessed to

determine whether this changes the significance levels

assigned in the EIS.

Wind x The changes to the height of Block B and Westaway are

unlikely to result in any changes to the findings from the EIS

Socioeconomics x Changes do not alter findings from the EIS

TVIA The changes to the height Westaway may result in changes

to the magnitude of impact and have been reassessed

within the EISA.

4 Heritage

4.1 In relation to the Granite Block, it is proposed to reduce the height of Block B in the zone

closest to the rear façade from 34m to 32m and to secure this through a design principle

that would be guaranteed by a planning condition. This will significantly reduce the

visibility of Block B to ensure that less than a full floor height is visible above the Granite

Block parapet, and to secure this through a design principle. in views from the opposite

side of Gloucester Street, to the point where the impact on the setting of the Granite

Block – as viewed from Gloucester Street - will be slight. This represents an impact of

less significance than was identified in the EIS.

Figure 1 below shows the sight lines from Gloucester Street demonstrating that less

than a full floor height would be visible.


Figure 1 Section showing reduction in height behind Granite Block (less than full floor

height visible)

4.2 In relation to the changes proposed for Westaway, the parameter envelope has been

refined so that there are now four defined building heights (17.9m, 13.2m, 9m and 5.6m).

The height of development in the zone adjacent to Savile Street has been reduced to

5.6m and the development at the corner of Savile Street and Elizabeth Place now

incorporates a set-back. As a result, the scale of the new development has an improved

relationship to the domestic scale of these streets, and the impact on listed assets at 24

Savile Street and 14 Elizabeth Place is reduced from moderate to minor.

5 Waste

5.1 For the purposes of construction waste impacts 60% of the basement area of the Main

Building (7,500m2) has been assumed as the extent of basement within this zone.

Based on this assumption, the comparison of the new waste generation volumes with

those assessed in the EIS are set out in Table 4-1 below.

Table 5-1 Estimated Excavation Waste – comparison with EIS data and July 2018 designs

Year Estimated Excavation Waste (EIS) Contingency

New Estimated Excavation Waste (July 2018)

New Contingency

Total Excavation waste (EIS) New Total

Excavation Waste

Volume (m3) Volume (m3) Volume (m3) Volume (m3) Volume (m3) Volume (m3)

2019 30,163 3,016 26726 2,673

33,179 29,399

2022 18,139 1,814 27440 2,744 19,953 30,184

2025 2,955 296 1966 197 3,251 2,163

Total 51,257 5,126 56132 5,613

56,383 61,745


5.2 The figures above show that there is estimated to be an increase in excavation waste

volumes of approximately 9.5% from those identified in the EIS. Whilst this represents

an increase, these changes in waste volumes do not result in changes to the overall

predicted significance of effect.

6 Townscape and Visual Impact

Volumetric Amendment to Block B

6.1 The proposed reduction in the height of Block B to 32m to the rear of the Granite Block

will have the effect of decreasing the perceived height of the hospital roofline as seen

from Gloucester Street. This will mitigate its impact on these views and on the setting

of the Granite Block; the degree of mitigation will vary depending on viewing position.

Revised versions of the relevant visualizations are to be prepared to confirm whether

this amendment will have any implications for the magnitude of effects predicted in the

TVIA.

Amended Massing of Westaway Court Building

6.2 The findings of the TVIA (EIS Chapter 15) should be assumed to remain valid unless

varied by this document. It is supported by a supplementary version of the

visualizations, six of which have been amended to take account of the changes; these

relate to Viewpoints 11, 21, 23, 24, 25 and 26.

Approach

6.3 The re-assessment has comprised the following steps:

The revised massing model was reviewed and relevant views identified;

Amended versions of the visualizations were prepared for these views;

The assessment of these views, as set out in EIS Table 15.4, was re-visited; and

Any implications for the predicted effects were identified.

6.4 Only six views were considered to merit re-modelling. These comprise one longer-

distance view (Viewpoint 11) and five close-range views (Viewpoints 21, 23, 24, 25 and

26). Although Westaway Court is glimpsed in one or two other views, its influence is

minimal and these were not considered to require remodelling. No further desktop

research or fieldwork has been carried out.


Implications for the Assessment Views

6.5 An amended version of the relevant views from Table 15.4 is attached. The changes

are as follows:

The descriptive text has been updated to more accurately reflect what is shown in

the views.

The magnitude of change is considered to remain the same for five of the views.

This is because, even with the amended modelling, the overall scale of the

proposed building, and thereby its relationship both to the existing building and to

its immediate context, remain broadly similar to the previous proposal.

The magnitude of change is considered to be reduced from high to medium for one

view: Viewpoint 25 (Savile Street). This is because the massing of the building has

been stepped back, so that its perceived height is similar to that of the existing four-

storey building and lower than that of the existing tower block. Whilst the

composition of the view will still change – particularly in terms of the larger footprint

and loss of trees – the refined massing allows the magnitude of impact to be

reduced by one order of magnitude.

Implications for the Predicted Effects

6.6 As indicated on the Table 5-1 (which is an extract from EIS Table 15.4), the reduced

magnitude of change affects two categories of receptor: pedestrians and residents in

Savile Street. The effects on these receptors are thereby predicted to decrease as

follows:

Pedestrians: from Moderate to Slight; and

Residents: from Substantial to Moderate to Substantial.

6.7 There would be no change in the significance of these effects; the effects on pedestrians

are not considered to be significant, whilst the effects on local residents are considered

to remain significant (but of reduced magnitude) in amenity terms.

6.8 The TVIA concluded that the effects on some residents in Savile Street would be

adverse. This was mainly due to the foreshortening and partial obstruction of views that

would result from the introduction of a building of substantial scale and larger footprint.

Whilst these sources of impact would remain, they have been mitigated by the revised

modelling. When considered in combination with the benefits of removing the existing

tower block and parking, together with the opportunity to create a building of


demonstrable design quality, it is possible that some of these effects could now be

neutral (but still significant).

6.9 The revised modelling will also ameliorate the effect on the streetscape of Savile Street,

which already has a somewhat unbalanced character, due to the juxtaposition of

Westaway Court with the two-storey dwellings opposite. However, the overall effect at

character area level is considered to remain unchanged at medium.

6.10 There would be no implications for the cumulative effects.


Table 5-1 (extract from EIS Table 15.4): Evaluation of Effects on Assessment Views and Associated Receptors Extract to show the Impact of the Revised Westaway Court Proposals on Selected Views

VP Description and Magnitude of Change to View Receptors Sensitivity Receptor-Specific

Magnitude of

Change

Significance of Effect

11 The “1980s block”, the chimney and the tower block at Westaway Court would be removed.

On the main hospital site, Blocks A and B are seen to extend to the right and to sit above the prevailing height of surrounding buildings. However, they are perceived to be about half the height of the chimney and about 25% lower than the “1980s block”. They do not breach the skyline (unlike the chimney and “1980s block”).

The development extends partly across the view towards Mont de la Ville, but would not obstruct the view of Fort Regent.

The development at Westaway Court is seen to be significantly lower than the existing tower block, but would extend further laterally and above the prevailing height of surrounding buildings. The visible height of St Thomas’ Church is slightly reduced, but would not be obstructed.

Magnitude of Change to View: Medium

Urban Character Area: Town Edges

and Slopes

High Medium Moderate to Substantial

Iconic Landmark: St Thomas’s Church High Low Moderate

Iconic Landmark: Fort Regent High Low Moderate

Major Local Landmark: Unlisted

Hospital Buildings

Low Very High Moderate to Substantial

Visual receptors: Road users Very Low Medium Slight

Visual receptors: Pedestrians Low Medium Slight to Moderate

Visual receptors: Residents on

Westmount Road


Visual receptors: Users of People’s

Park


21 The existing buildings at Westaway Court are replaced by a block that is perceived to be of greater scale (twice the height of the adjoining Maison du

Urban Character Area: The Parade

and Esplanade

Medium Low Slight to Moderate

Important Urban Space: Parade

Gardens

Medium Medium Moderate


Pape building), but slightly lower than the existing tower block.

Magnitude of Change: Medium

Visual receptors: Users of Parade

Gardens


Major Local Landmark: Unlisted

Hospital Buildings

Low Very High Moderate to Substantial


Gardens

Medium High Moderate to Substantial


Gardens

Medium High Moderate to Substantial

23 The existing buildings at Westaway Court are replaced by a block of demonstrably greater height and extent, which is perceived to be taller than the existing tower block and obstructs slightly more of the view towards Elizabeth Place.



and Esplanade



Gardens



Gardens


24 The existing buildings at Westaway Court are replaced by a block of demonstrably greater height and extent, which is perceived to be up to 50% taller and extends further along both facades.



and Esplanade


Visual receptors: Road users Very Low Low Negligible to Slight

Visual receptors: Pedestrians Low Medium Slight

Visual receptors: Residents in

Elizabeth Place


25 The existing buildings at Westaway Court are replaced by a block of demonstrably larger footprint. Its height is perceived to be broadly similar to that of the existing 4-storey block and lower than that of the existing tower block. The two mature trees within the site would be removed and the view towards Elizabeth Place obstructed.



and Esplanade


Visual receptors: Pedestrians Low Medium Slight

Visual receptors: Residents in Savile

Street

High Medium Moderate


26 The buildings at Westaway Court are replaced by a block of demonstrably larger footprint that is perceived to be taller than the existing 4-storey block. The glimpse of the “1980s block” to the right would be lost, together with the view towards Parade Gardens and the two mature trees within the site.

Magnitude of Change: High


and Esplanade


Visual receptors: Road users Very Low High Slight to Moderate

Visual receptors: Pedestrians Low High Moderate

Visual receptors: Residents in Rouge

Bouillon and Elizabeth Place

High High Substantial


7 Corrections to errors in EIS Noise and Vibration Chapter

7.1 In EIS Chapter 6 Noise and Vibration, a number of errors and omissions have been

identified which are highlighted below.

7.2 Paragraph 6.86 of the EIS reported that noise from construction traffic using Kensington

Place would exceed the assessment criterion for daytime construction noise and lead to

a significant adverse effect. This was incorrect and due to a calculation error. The

correct construction traffic noise levels were included in Appendix C-4, Table 5, but

these are not reflected in paragraph 6.86, which should have stated that the traffic noise

levels would be below the criterion and consequently there is not a significant effect

identified.

7.3 Paragraph 6.89 of the EIA refers to construction traffic along Lewis Street. It should have

stated ‘traffic during construction’, referring to the re-routing of non-construction traffic

along Lewis Street during the works. Construction traffic will not use Lewis Street.

7.4 Table 6.18 within the EIS presents the predicted construction noise levels during Phase

1A. The predictions for the receptors on Newgate Street and Patriotic Street, and for

those around Westaway Court were omitted. The following table should be read in place

of Table 6.18 of the EIS.

7.5 EIS Paragraph 6.129 should read that the residual effect of construction noise is not

significant at all receptors for phases 1A and 1B. During phase 2 however, the effect is

NSR (see Figure 6.5)

Approx. distance to site centre

(m)

Assumed stage* activity noise level (dBLAeq,T)

1 2 3 4

A 33 73 75 75 63

B 18 79 81 81 69

C 22 77 79 79 68

D 25 76 78 78 67

E 25 76 75 75 67

F 22 77 76 76 68

I 52 68 70 70 58

J 40 71 73 73 61

K 26 76 77 77 66

L 33 73 75 75 64

*Construction stages defined in paragraph 6.92


significant at receptor H. The assessment summary matrix also should reflect this

change.

8 Conclusion

8.1 This EISA has set out the changes proposed in relation to the parameter envelope and

design principles submitted for planning application PP/2018/0507 on 13th April 2018

and identified whether these changes are likely to result in any changes to the

environmental assessment that was undertaken and reported within the EIS.

8.2 With the exception of waste, heritage and LVIA all environmental topics were scoped

out based on the conclusion that the proposed changes would not change the

conclusions presented in the EIS.

8.3 The assessment of effects related to heritage and LVIA concludes that the proposed

changes will result in ameliorated effects. The volumes of waste have been identified

as being approximately 9.5% more than was identified in the EIS, but this does not

change the level of impact significance identified which remains as significant.


Appendix A

Updated parameter plans

All parameter plans have been updated to include updated contact information. Table

A1-1 identifies which parameter plans have been updated to reflect design revisions.

Table A0-1 Parameter plan updates

Parameter

plan

Revision Changes

PL021 S2.P02 Granite Block ridge height reduced based on updated site

information

PL101 S2.P06 Basement footprint and key annotation added to sheet

Westaway Court parcel footprint / dimensions updated

Site underlay updated to reflect proposed road layout at

The Parade

PL102 S2.P06 Frontages updated to align to current internal clinical

planning / departmental adjacencies

Westaway Court: Elizabeth Place, Savile Street, laneway

made secondary frontage



The Parade

PL103 S2.P06 Zones of disruption graphic and key annotation added to

break Block B skyline massing


Westaway Court heights updated to revised parameter

envelope (overall height remains +17.90 relative to

Westaway Court project datum)



The Parade

PL104 S2.P06 Indicative internal routes graphic and key annotation

updated to reflect current internal planning

Key annotations for primary/secondary pedestrian routes

revised to clarify L00/L01 routes

Key annotation for MSCP updated to include 'entry/egress'

Secondary entrance added on Newgate Street to reflect

anticipated Minors Emergency entrance

Public Realm reduced at Edward Place to reflect loading

bay

Primary / secondary ground floor routes amended to reflect

developments in entrance positions

Extent of new public edge treatment adjusted at Edward

Place gable end


Westaway Court primary entrance scope amended


The Parade

PL106 S2.P05 Phase 1B hatch extended to include strip between

Parameter Envelope and Gloucester St



The Parade

PL201 S2.P05 Note added to clarify street name annotations

Zones of disruption graphic and key annotation added to



Non-occupied floor hatch, +29.00 levels, and key

annotation removed

Granite Block ridge height reduced based on updated site

information


Parameter massing adjusted to include setback to Savile

Street, increased height to Elizabeth Place, and extended

length to the top floor Parade Gardens mass


Non-occupied floor hatch, +29.00 levels, and key

annotation removed



Basement extents updated in Section CC, key annotation

added to sheet




Basement extents updated in Section FF, key annotation

added to sheet

Kensington Place typo corrected in Sections DD/EE

annotations

PL311 S2P02 Note added to clarify street name annotations

Parameter massing adjusted to include setback to Savile

Street, increased height to Elizabeth Place, and extended

length to the top floor Parade Gardens mass

Indicative width of Savile Street made consistent between

elevation views on sheet


Spot elevation heights rounded to two decimal places to

coordinate with Main Hospital sheets


Updated Figures from EIS Volume III: Figures

Environmental Impact Statement | Chapter 1 | Introduction 8-21

THE PARADE

KENSINGTON PLACE

GLOUCESTER STREET

NEW

GATE STREET

PATRIOTIC STREET

ESPLANADE

LEWIS STREET

PEIRSON ROAD

SAND STREET

ST AUBINS ROAD

CHEAPSIDE

PATRIOTIC

PLACE

WESTMOUNT ROAD

+20.60

+15.60

+15.60

+20.60

+15.60+16.70

+13.20+9.00

+17.90

+19.00

SA

VIL

E S

TRE

ET

ELIZA

BETH L

ANE

ELIZA

BETH P

LACE

SAVILE STREET

+15.60

6000

60006000

6000

2380

+10.00

5100

KENSINGTO

N STREET

+14.20(to match existing)

+11.90(to match existing)

+5.60

+34.00

32500

+34.00

A

B

B

SHADES OF GREY SHOW INDICATIVE RELATIVE HEIGHTS WITH THE SHORTER MASSING SHOWN LIGHTEST

NB. ALL LEVELS SHOWN IN BLUE TEXT INDICATE MAXIMUM HEIGHTS FOR THE MAIN HOSPITAL SCHEME. HEIGHTS ARE RELATIVE TO PROJECT DATUM LEVEL 0.00m (GROUND FLOOR DATUM) = JERSEY DATUM LEVEL (+10.00m)

ALL LEVELS SHOWN IN RED TEXT INDICATE MAXIMUM HEIGHTS FOR THE WESTAWAY SCHEME. HEIGHTS ARE RELATIVE TO PROJECT DATUM LEVEL 0.00m (GROUND FLOOR DATUM) = JERSEY DATUM LEVEL (+12.00m)

• +15.60 HEIGHTS TO PODIUM DO NOT INCLUDE FOR BALUSTRADING TO PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE ROOF ZONES. THE PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS FOR BALUSTRADING TO THESE AREAS ARE DEFINED IN THE PARAMETER SECTION DRAWINGS.

• THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING EXCLUDE THE HEIGHTS OF ANY PROTECTIVE HANDRAILS, HARNESSING EQUIPMENT ETC REQUIRED FOR ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE TO ROOFS.

+20.00

+20.00

ZONE OF DISRUPTION A - ZONE WITHIN WHICH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT WILL BE INSERTED TO BREAK ROOFLINE TO WARD BLOCK ELEMENTS AND A PLAN INDENTATION AND / OR CHANGE IN MATERIALS INSERTED TO PROVIDE RELIEF / SHADOWING TO THIS SKYLINE ELEVATION

ZONE OF DISRUPTION B - ZONE WITHIN WHICH A PLAN INDENTATION AND / OR CHANGE IN MATERIALS WILL BE INSERTED TO PROVIDE RELIEF / SHADOWING TO THIS SKYLINE ELEVATION

ZONE WHERE REDUCTION IN PARAMETER VOLUME IS APPLIED TO REDUCE HEIGHT OF BUILDING BEHIND GRANITE BLOCK

OUTLINE OF PROPOSED FUTURE HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT

0

1:750

15 30 60

HASSELL Limited CN 75458191 CURTAIN PLACELONDONEC2A 3AN UNITED [email protected] +44 207 490 7669

HASSELL

CONSULTANT

PROJECT

CLIENT

Original Sheet Size A1 - 841 x 594mm

DRAWING TITLE

SCALE @ A1 APPROVED

STATUS

PROJECT# - ORIGIN. - ZONE - LEVEL - TYPE - ROLE - DRAWING# - STATUS+REV

NOTES

1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS GOVERN.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

3. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE PROCEEDING

WITH THE WORK. HASSELL SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.

4. THIS DRAWING MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT

CONTRACTS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS.

THIS DRAWING IS AN UNCONTROLLED COPY. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

© COPYRIGHT OF THIS DRAWING IS VESTED IN HASSELL.

2018 HASSELL. LTD.

ORIGINATOR PROJECT #

012145

REVIEWED

23/07

/2018

21:44

:15C:

\_Rev

itPr

ojects

\1807

20_J

FH-H

SL-M

1-ZZ

-M3-

A-BU

ILD_P

R_Ou

tlineP

lannin

g_RE

V_HA

RWX.

rvt

1 : 750

JERSEY FUTURE HOSPITAL (JFH)

THE PARADE, ST HELIER, JERSEYJE1_3QS

CL

FIGURE 3.1 - PARAMETER PLAN 03 - BUILDINGHEIGHTS

FOR INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE

JFH-HSL-M1-ZZ-DR-A-PL103-S2.P06

WH

REV DESCRIPTION DATE

S2.P01 FIRST ISSUE 02/03/18

S2.P02 SECOND ISSUE 17/03/18

S2.P03 UPDATED BOUNDARY, PARAMETEREXTENT

24/03/18

S2.P04 UPDATED BOUNDARY 04/04/18

S2.P05 OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION ISSUE 11/04/18

S2.P06 OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION ISSUEREVISED

23/07/18

THE PARADE

KENSINGTON PLACE

GLOUCESTER STREET

NEW

GATE STREET

PATRIOTIC STREET

ESPLANADE

LEWIS STREET

PEIRSON ROAD

SAND STREET

ST AUBINS ROAD

CHEAPSIDE

PATRIOTIC

PLACE

WESTMOUNT ROAD

SA

VIL

E S

TRE

ET

ELIZA

BETH L

ANE

ELIZA

BETH P

LACE

SAVILE STREET

KENSINGTO

N STREET


PARAMETER EXTENTS

PRIMARY FRONTAGE - ZONE FOR PRIMARY HOSPITAL ENTRANCE AND ACTIVE FRONTAGES

SECONDARY FRONTAGE - ZONE WHERE OCCUPIED FLOORS AND SECONDARY ENTRANCES ARE PREDOMINANTLY LOCATED (DOES NOT EXCLUDE LIMITED LOUVRES FOR AIR INTAKE / EXHAUST OR PLANT ROOM ACCESS LOCATIONS)

TERTIARY FRONTAGE - ZONE WHERE CONCEALED ELEVATIONS ALLOW FOR PLANT / LOUVRES / SERVICE ACCESS

PROPOSED ACCESS TO NEWGATE STREET AT GROUND FLOOR ONLY

0

1:750

15 30 60


HASSELL

CONSULTANT

PROJECT

CLIENT


DRAWING TITLE

SCALE @ A1 APPROVED

STATUS


NOTES









2018 HASSELL. LTD.


012145

REVIEWED

23/07

/2018

21:44

:00C:

\_Rev

itPr

ojects

\1807

20_J

FH-H

SL-M

1-ZZ

-M3-

A-BU

ILD_P

R_Ou

tlineP

lannin

g_RE

V_HA

RWX.

rvt

1 : 750



CL

FIGURE 3.2PARAMETER PLAN 02 - BUILDINGFRONTAGES

FOR INFORMATION



WH





24/03/18




23/07/18

THE PARADE

KENSINGTON PLACE

GLOUCESTER STREET

NEW

GATE STREET

PATRIOTIC STREET

ESPLANADE

LEWIS STREET

PEIRSON ROAD

SAND STREET

ST AUBINS ROAD

CHEAPSIDE

PATRIOTIC

PLACE

WESTMOUNT ROAD

SA

VIL

E S

TRE

ET

ELIZA

BETH L

ANE

ELIZA

BETH P

LACE

SAVILE STREET

KENSINGTO

N STREET


NEW PUBLIC REALM ZONE

NEW PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (GROUND FLOOR)

NEW SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (GROUND FLOOR)

PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN ZONE SHOWN (GROUND FLOOR)

NEW PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (LEVEL 01)

SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN ZONE SHOWN (GROUND FLOOR)

SECONDARY ENTRANCE (USED AS INTERIM ENTRY DURING PHASE 2)

INDICATIVE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (PUBLIC / STAFF)

PATRIOTIC STREET MSCP ENTRANCE / EGRESS

NEW PUBLIC EDGE TREATMENT

PROPOSED ACCESS TO NEWGATE STREET AT GROUND FLOOR ONLY

PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN ZONE SHOWN (LEVEL 01)

0

1:750

15 30 60


HASSELL

CONSULTANT

PROJECT

CLIENT


DRAWING TITLE

SCALE @ A1 APPROVED

STATUS


NOTES









2018 HASSELL. LTD.


012145

REVIEWED

23/07

/2018

21:44

:34C:

\_Rev

itPr

ojects

\1807

20_J

FH-H

SL-M

1-ZZ

-M3-

A-BU

ILD_P

R_Ou

tlineP

lannin

g_RE

V_HA

RWX.

rvt

1 : 750



CL

FIGURE 3.3 -PARAMETER PLAN 04 - GROUNDFLOOR PUBLIC REALM ANDPEDESTRIANS

FOR INFORMATION



WH





24/03/18




23/07/18


THE PARADE

KENSINGTON PLACE

GLOUCESTER STREET

NEW

GATE STREET

PATRIOTIC STREET

ESPLANADE

LEWIS STREET

PEIRSON ROAD

SAND STREET

ST AUBINS ROAD

CHEAPSIDE

PATRIOTIC

PLACE

WESTMOUNT ROAD

PHASE 1B PHASE 2

PHASE 1A

PHASE 1A

PHASE 1A

SA

VIL

E S

TRE

ET

ELIZA

BETH L

ANE

ELIZA

BETH P

LACE

SAVILE STREET

KENSINGTO

N STREET

INTERIMDROPOFF

PHASE 1A

PHASE 1B

PHASE 2

INTERIM DROP-OFF

0

1:750

15 30 60


HASSELL

CONSULTANT

PROJECT

CLIENT


DRAWING TITLE

SCALE @ A1 APPROVED

STATUS


NOTES









2018 HASSELL. LTD.


012145

REVIEWED

23/07

/2018

21:44

:59C:

\_Rev

itPr

ojects

\1807

20_J

FH-H

SL-M

1-ZZ

-M3-

A-BU

ILD_P

R_Ou

tlineP

lannin

g_RE

V_HA

RWX.

rvt

1 : 750



CL

FIGURE 3.4PARAMETER PLAN 06 - PHASING

FOR INFORMATION



WH




24/03/18




23/07/18

Cheapside

Cheapside

Kensington Street

Kensington Street

Lewis Street

Lewis Street

A3

Job Title

Client

4 Pierhead Street

Cardiff CF10 4QP

Tel +44 29 2047 3727 Fax +44 29 2047 2277

www.arup.com

Issue Date By Chkd Appd

© Arup

Job No

237035-00

Drawing No Issue

03

Approval

JFH-ARP-ZZ-XX-DR-Y-1003

Scale at A3

NTS

Suitability

Role

Civil

ParadeGardensParade

Gardens

Legend

Operational Hospital

Junction Works

Plant

Demolition & Construction Site

01 BOS23-03-2018

Issued For Approval

AW BP

Department for Infrastructure

Jersey Future Hospital

Figure 1: Overview of ProposalsPhase 1A

02 BOS10-04-2018 AW BP

Kensington Place

Kensington Place

The Parade

The Parade

Gloucester Street

Gloucester Street

St Aubins Road

St Aubins Road

Granite Block

Plant

BP03 MK18-07-2018 AW

Patriotic Street

MSCP

JerseyGeneralHospital

Block A

Direction of Traffic

Service Road

Ambulance Access

WestawayCourt

!°

Newgate Street

Newgate Street

People’sPark

People’sPark

Peirson Road

Peirson Road

The ParadeThe Parade

Union StreetUnion Street

York Street

York Street

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Savile StreetSavile Street

Patriotic Street

Patriotic Street

Patriotic Place

Patriotic Place

Ambulance access retained

Motocycle access only

Barrier to MSCP access removed to avoid queuing on Kensington Place

MSCP access

Construction vehicles only

Proposed alteration to junction

Proposed junction improvement scheme

Residential parking on Kensington Place to be temporarily relocated (potentially to People’s Park)

Service road between JGH and Block A will removed to enable construction

Phased road closure of Kensington Place and buildouts removed to enable construction

MSCP egress relocated from Newgate Street to Patriotic Street

Proposed works to Patriotic Street MSCP including an additional half deck, improvements to core and a pedestrian link to Block A

Direction of one-way traffic reversed to enable the closure of Kensington Place. Potential for 20mph speed limit to be introduced for the duration of the closure

Plant relocated to Granite Block forecourt to enable demolition of the energy centre. Staff parking relocated to a public car park

Proposed alterations the to pedestrian refuge island to accomondate construction vehicles

Figure 7.1: Overview of ProposalsPhase 1A

Cheapside

Cheapside

Kensington Street

Kensington Street

Lewis Street

Lewis Street

A3

Job Title

Client

4 Pierhead Street

Cardiff CF10 4QP

Tel +44 29 2047 3727 Fax +44 29 2047 2277

www.arup.com


© Arup

Job No

237035-00

Drawing No Issue

03

Approval

Scale at A3

NTS

Suitability

Role

Civil

ParadeGardensParade

Gardens

Legend


Junction Improvements

Hospital Allocated Parking

Plant

Demolition & Construction Site

01 BOS23-03-2018

Issued For Approval

PA PT



Figure 2: Overview of ProposalsPhase 1B

02 BOS10-04-2018 PA PTKensington Place

Kensington Place

The Parade

The Parade

Gloucester Street

Gloucester Street

St Aubin’s Road

St Aubin’s Road

Granite Block

Plant

Proposed alterations the to pedestrian refuge isalnd as per Phase 1A

Patriotic Street

MSCP

JerseyGeneralHospital

Block B(under construction)

Block A


Service Road

Ambulance AccessWestaway

Court

!°

Newgate Street

Newgate Street

Patriotic Place

Patriotic Place

People’sPark

People’sPark

Peirson Road

Peirson Road

The ParadeThe Parade

Union StreetUnion Street

York Street

York Street

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Savile StreetSavile Street

Patriotic Street

Patriotic Street

Motorcycle Parking

Proposed improvement scheme including the provision of a signalised pedestrian crossings on Savile Street

Public short-stay parking to be allocated for Patient Transport Services

Proposed service block with access/egress from Kensington Place

Public short-stay parking to be allocated for patient drop-off

Ambulance access retained

Two-way running of Patriotic Pace

Alterations to MSCP accesses to enable closure of Newgate Street

Pedestrian link proposed between Block A and the MSCP

Access to the rear of properties fronting Edward Place retained

MSCP accesses

Staff cycle parking relocated in to Patriotic Street MSCP

Hospital parking relocated to Patriotic Street MSCP

Phased closure of Newgate Street

Removal of three short-stay parking spaces and the relocation of three doctors parking spaces in to Patriotic Street MSCP

Proposed signalisation of Gloucester Street/ Seaton Place/Patriotic Place junction to enable two-way running of Patriotic Place. Signalised pedestrian crossings proposed as part of the temporary junction arrangement JFH-ARP-ZZ-XX-DR-Y-1004

Junction Improvement Scheme as per Phase 1A

BP03 MK18-07-2018 AW

Proposed access to the mortuary from Kensington Place

Figure 7.2: Overview of ProposalsPhase 1B

Cheapside

Cheapside

Cheapside

Kensington Street

Kensington Street

Kensington Street

Lewis Street

Lewis Street

Lewis Street

A3

Job Title

Client

4 Pierhead Street Cardiff CF10 4QP Tel +44 29 2047 3727 Fax +44 29 2047 2277www.arup.com


© Arup

Job No

237035-00

Drawing No Issue

03

Approval

Scale at A3

NTS

Suitability

Role

Civil

ParadeGardensParadeGardensParadeGardens

Legend


Junction ImprovementsAmbulance Only Lane

01 BOS23-03-2018

Issued For Approval

AW BP



Figure 3: Overview of ProposalsPhase 2 Final State

JFH-ARP-ZZ-XX-DR-Y-1001

02 BOS10-04-2018 AW BP

BP

Kensington Place

Kensington Place

The Parade

The Parade

Gloucester Street

Gloucester Street

Gloucester Street

aceace

The Paraded

The Parade

Granite Block

Patriotic Street

MSCP

Block B

Block C

Block A


Service RoadAmbulance Access

WestawayCourt

!°

Newgate Street

Newgate Street

Newgate Street

People’sPark

People’sPark

People’sPark

Peirson Road

Peirson Road

Peirson Road

The ParadeThe ParadeThe Parade

Union StreetUnion StreetUnion Street

York Street

York Street

York Street

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Elizab

eth Plac

e

Savile StreetSavile StreetSavile Street

Patriotic Street

Patriotic Street

Patriotic Street Patriotic Place

Patriotic Place

Patriotic Place

Junction improvement scheme as per Phase 1A

Proposed improvement scheme including the provision of a pedestrian crossing as per Phase 1B

Motorcycle Parking

Block C provides the main entrance in to Jersey Future Hospital

Proposed drop-off for patients and taxis

On-street parking on The Parade removed alongside proposed improvements to public realm

Pedestrian crossing to be reinstated to previous dimensions

Staff cycle parking proposed in the basement of Block B and adjacent to the Granite Block

Proposed junction improvement scheme including a signalised pedestrian crossing

Proposed junction improvment scheme including signalised pedestrian crossings

Newgate Street proposed to be two-way running (ambulance only north-westbound)

MSCP accesses reinstated on Patriotic Street

Ambulance bay relocated to Newgate Street

Proposed extension to Newgate Street for ambulances only

Build-outs on Kensington Place reinstated

Proposed layby for Patient Transport Services

03 MK18-07-2018 AW

Figure 7.3: Overview of ProposalsPhase 2 Final State

jersey future hospital - government of jersey and wellbeing... · 8 conclusion ... basement - the...

Documents