jeong-tae kwon and june-seek choi department of psychology, korea university, seoul 136-701, korea
DESCRIPTION
Cornering the Fear Engram: Long-Term Synaptic Changes in the Lateral Nucleus of the Amygdala after Fear Conditioning. Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea. The Journal of Neuroscience, August 5, 2009 • 29(31):9700–9703. 1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cornering the Fear Engram: Long-Term Synaptic Changes in the Lateral Nucleus of the Amygdala after Fear Conditioning
Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek ChoiDepartment of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 5, 2009 • 29(31):9700–9703
1
![Page 2: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction• In a typical fear conditioning, an initially
neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) is contingently paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). As a result, the CS comes to elicit the conditioned response (CR), an orchestration of autonomic, behavioral, and endocrine responses that prepares the organism for
the upcoming threat.
2
![Page 3: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction• The weight of the anatomical and neurobiol
ogical evidence suggests that the amygdala, especially the lateral nucleus (LA), is where the sensory information for the CS and the US converge (Romanski et al., 1993), and the critical cellular changes occur as a result of the convergent activation (Fanselow and LeDoux, 1999).
3
![Page 4: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction• Many studies suggest that fear conditioning pot
entiates synaptic efficacy of some LA neurons.
(1) Enhances auditory CS-evoked field potentials (EFPs) in the LA (Rogan et al.,1997) and short-latency neuronal responses in freely moving animals (Quirk et al., 1995)
(2) synaptic currents in LA neurons were potentiated in brain slices prepared from fear-conditioned rats (McKernan and Shinnick-Gallagher, 1997)
4
![Page 5: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction• However, none of the studies can exclude
the possibility that the synaptic changes observed in the LA are secondary to those in other synapses in the fear circuit. In fact, an alternative site of critical plasticity has been proposed (Cahill et al., 1999).
5
![Page 6: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction This study tested whether the
enhanced synaptic changes observed in the LA is a direct consequence of fear conditioning and gave a direct evidence linking localized cellular changes with behavior.
6
![Page 7: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Materials and Methods
Surgery for electrode implantation
(1) stimulating electrodes in the MGm and MGv
(2) recording electrodes in LA (for experiment 2, to record EFP in the MGm–LA synapse )
7
![Page 8: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Materials and Methods
CS: electrical stimulation of MGm or MGvUS: footshock
8
![Page 9: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Materials and Methods
• Experiment 1: to test whether electrical stimulation of the MGm or MGv could be used as the CS (three groups: MGm-paired, MGm-unpaired, MGv-paired)
• Experiment 2: to test whether conditioning with the MGm-stimulation CS could induce synaptic changes.
9
![Page 10: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Materials and Methods
10
To make a suitable current stimulation
CS-only
For experiment 2
CS and US
For experiment 2
CS-only, 10 trials for experiment 1
Procedure for experiment 2 ( experiment 1, exclude step 3 and 5 )
![Page 11: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Materials and Methods
EFP recording :(1) under anesthesia(2) a monopulse stimulus (100 us) was deliv
ered through the stimulating electrode while EFP was being monitored in the LA, stimulation was delivered at every 30 s for 15 min
11
![Page 12: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results
12
Experiment 1:
Changes in freezing during conditioning. preconditioning phase (B1–B3), conditioning phase (C1–C6), the retention test (R1–R10)
![Page 13: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Results
13
Conclusion from experiment 1:(1)The CR was produced by the associative learning rather than nonspecific sensitization because neither brain stimulation alone nor noncontingent pairing of the CS and the US resulted in a significant level of freezing.
(2) MGm stimulation is privileged in producing learning-related changes after fear conditioning, perhaps attributable to direct thalamo-amygdala projections
![Page 14: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Results
14
Experiment 2:
A representative EFP Waveform on a single trial (gray line, preconditioning; black line, postconditioning). EFP amplitude was defined as the differencebetween the first positive peak and the first negative valley, marked by two dotted horizontal lines. Calibration: 200 uV, 5 ms
![Page 15: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Results
15
Experiment 2:
Average EFP data showing percentage changes after conditioning. Each data point represents an average of two trials presented at every 30 s.
![Page 16: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results
16
Experiment 2:
Changes in freezing during the retention test.
![Page 17: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results
17
Experiment 2:
Relation between fear memory retention and postconditioning EFP enhancement..
![Page 18: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Results
18
Conclusion from experiment 2:
MGm-paired group showed significantly higher level of EFP to the same MGm stimulation compared with the preconditioning session, which was highly correlated with subsequently measured fear. It may indicate that fear memory trace is stored as a form of modified synaptic efficacy.
![Page 19: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Summary• combining a simple associative learningwith
thewell established brain circuit, we confirmed the SPM hypothesis in fear conditioning that the use-dependent synaptic plasticity in LA is induced as a direct consequence of contingent pairings of the
CS and US in behaving animals.
19
![Page 20: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary• High correlation was found between the incr
eased EFPs in LA neurons and the CR level, strongly implying a causal relationship.
• Additional study is needed to test whether MGm–LA synaptic plasticity is sufficient for fear memory storage.
20
![Page 21: Jeong-Tae Kwon and June-Seek Choi Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815b81550346895dc97f4f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Thank you!
21