january 2011

26
January 2011 A W3 LIFESTYLE MINIZINE Redcliffe at Kenton Place EXPERIENCE A W3 L!FESTYLE Apartment Living at it’s Best Gut Feelings 5 You Shouldn’t Ignore SLEEP IT OFF Avoid Unwanted Weight by Getting More Z’s Intuitive Eating A Kinder, Gentler Way to Lose Weight? Articles of 2010 Best Passionate For YOU 2011 Plan of Action Live and Be Eliminate Blame, Complaining, and Procrastination QBQ!

Upload: david-wolfe

Post on 04-Mar-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

January 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: January 2011

January 2011

A W3 LIFESTYLE MINIZINERedcliffe at Kenton Place

EXPERIENCE A W3 L!FESTYLEApartment Living at it’s Best

GutFeelings5

You Shouldn’t Ignore

SLEEP ITOFFAvoid Unwanted Weight by Getting More Z’s

IntuitiveEatingA Kinder, Gentler Way to Lose Weight?

Articles of2010

Best

PassionateFor YOU

2011 Plan of Action

Live and Be

Eliminate Blame,Complaining, and

Procrastination

QBQ!

Page 2: January 2011

Upcoming EventsWe can’t wait to have

some great fun with you in 2011! Please email us your event suggestions. After all...you are always the guest of honor!

Page 3: January 2011

Our Services Dedication to YOU!Awarded a National Apartment Designation as a W3 Lifestyle Community

Only a small percentage of apartment communities within a given market can hold the W3 Lifestyle designation. This National Apartment Designation represents Superior Resident Services and Superior Product Quality. Our community has achieved this great honor.

In 2011 we have many exciting things coming up including some fantastic resident events as well as your continuing to receive this publication every month which will always be jam packed with useful information. We may even have a few other tricks up our sleeves! It is our goal to make sure your living experience here is the absolute best that it can be.

YOU are what makes our community so special and we appreciate your desire to assist us with keeping it clean and making it a great place to live for not only yourself, but for your neighbors as well. Anytime you see anything that needs repaired on the community please feel free to let us know so that we can attend to it quickly.

COMMUNITY INFO - W3 LIFESTYLE 3

Click Image Below toJoin Your Community

on Facebook

Click Image Below toJoin W3 Lifestyle

on Facebook

Redcliffe at Kenton Place

Community ManagerJoanne Blank

Assistant Community Manager Lisa Nickol

Leasing Consultant Allison Barton

Maintenance Supervisor Don Mobley

Leasing Technician James Brown

Jerome Burrell

Phone(704) 439-0110

Fax(704) 439-0111

[email protected]

Webwww.PegasusResidential.com

Newsletter Advertising Inquiries

Todd Sherman

770-886-1881 ext. [email protected]

Tell all of your friends about what it is like living at a W3 Lifestyle designated

community!

National Apartment Designation www.W3Lifestyle.com

Page 4: January 2011

W3

LIFESTYLE

Join the W3 Lifestyle Fan Page

Visit the W3 Lifestyle facebook page, become our fan and get the latest updates and special deals specifically for W3 Lifestyle followers.

BE ON THE LOOKOUT...“Friends of W3 Lifestyle”

Special Retailer and Restaurant Discounts for W3 Lifestyle Community Residents

Page 5: January 2011

BE ON THE LOOKOUT...“Friends of W3 Lifestyle”

Getting StartedEXPERIENCE A W3 L!FESTYLE

Apartment Living at it’s Best

David WolfeW3 Lifestyle

Hello, and welcome to the digital edition of Experience A W3Lifestyle Minizine - a more innovative and paper-free way to enjoy community news, Forward-Thinking articles, Healthy Living advice and so much more.

Reading Experience a W3 Lifestyle onine is simple. Browse the Minizine page by page by using the right and left arrows in the navigation buttons at the sides of the pages or at the top of the page - whichever is more convenient for you.

This digital edition gives you convenient ways to:

Print the articles you like bestDownload whole issuesShare Articles with family and friends by emailing edition or posting to your Facebook, Twitter, etc.Click on Live Hyperlinks to instantly access Web resources included in articles and advertisementsAccess the Minizine when you are away from homePersonalize Page Views so they are comfortable for you to read

All of the above opportunities can be accessed via the comman buttons at the top of the page.

On more thing we like about the digital edition: It’s easy on the planet we all share. Reading the Minizine online not only spares natural resources, including trees and fossil fuels, it also reduces waste and minimizes environmental pollutants, including the greenhouse gases associated with global warming.

So thank you for giving our Community Minizine a try! As always, we appreciate you being a part of our great community.

Happy reading!

David WolfeDavid Wolfe, W3 LifestyleExperience a W3 Lifestyle Minizine

Click Image Below toJoin W3 Lifestyle

on Facebook

Page 6: January 2011

When I was in college, I of-ten began my homework at mid-night. Nothing seemed to focus my thoughts on a term paper better than a morning dead-line. I knew this routine wasn’t a wise one — after all, I might crash facedown in my textbook. But I told myself that adrenaline improved my writing. Besides, I figured I was losing weight on those nights with only four hours of sleep. I assumed that all that effort to stay awake and func-tional had to be zapping away the day’s calories.

Turns out that I was greatly mistak-en. In fact, recent research shows that lack of sleep can make people gain weight, not lose it. Perhaps night-owl behavior like mine helps explain the fa-

mous “freshman 15” — the aver-age number of pounds students gain in their freshman year of college.

People have acknowledged the value of sleep for centuries. But they’ve focused primarily on sleep’s impact on brain function and the obvious costs of burn-ing the candle at both ends: lowered mental acuity, irritabili-ty, and a greater chance of acci-dents and mistakes. “If you talk to some neuroscientists today, the prevailing view is still that sleep is only for the brain,” says Eve Van Cauter, PhD, professor of medicine at the University of Chicago and an expert on the ways sleep affects endocrine function.

Over the last few decades, sleep researchers across the country have been overturning that view. Their studies indicate that curtailing sleep and getting

New research shows that sleep significantly influences metabolism, appetite and weight management. Could getting more shuteye help you ward off excess pounds?

Sleep The Weight OffBy Kristin Ohlson

Page 7: January 2011

poor-quality sleep are implicated in many dis-eases that affect the entire body, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular dis-ease, cancer and impaired immune function.

One of the most startling observations has come from Van Cauter and her University of Chicago colleagues. Over the course of four studies, they showed that people who don’t sleep enough, night after night, unwittingly trig-ger a hormonal storm that causes their appe-tites to rise.

Other researchers followed up with studies looking at the long-term health of large popula-tions and found the implications of Van Cau-ter’s work borne out in real life: People who sleep fewer hours tend to become overweight or even obese. Even a difference of one hour is significant. Columbia University researchers, for instance, found that people between the ages of 32 and 59 who slept only four hours were 73 percent more likely to become obese than those sleeping seven to nine hours. Even a difference of two hours was significant. Those who slept only six hours were 23 percent more likely to become obese than those sleeping seven hours.

Does this mean we can shed pounds by get-ting additional shuteye? Maybe, but research hasn’t yet proven this supposition — the stud-ies looking at whether overweight people shed pounds when they sleep more are just getting under way. Still, it’s clear that insufficient sleep encourages weight gain and that getting ade-quate sleep helps prevent it.

For most of us, adequate sleep means seven to nine hours a night, and over recent decades, fewer of us have been reaching that goal. Ac-cording to research by the National Sleep Foundation, the average duration of sleep for Americans fell from a high of nearly nine hours in 1960 to seven hours in 2002, and to just over six and a half hours in 2009. More recent sur-veys show that the number of people sleeping fewer than six hours per night has doubled over the last four decades to nearly a third of the population.

“People tend to sacrifice sleep,” says Clete Kushida, MD, PhD, a sleep expert at Stan-ford’s Center for Human Sleep Research and a recent past president of the Ameri-can Academy of Sleep Medicine. “Even peo-

ple who pay attention to nutrition and exer-cise sacrifice sleep. They think they can get by with less, perhaps because the medical problems from sleep disorders usually be-come apparent [more slowly] over the years.” Bleary-Eyed and Craving Cookies

Studying sleep is big business in the Unit-ed States. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine has 8,000 members, and there are some 2,000 accredited sleep centers scattered across the country. Many are exploring the biochemical processes that go awry after too many nights of insufficient sleep. Others are in-vestigating the body’s response to poor-quality sleep — sleep disturbed by stress, anxiety, a snoring partner, loud neighbors, or conditions like restless leg syndrome and sleep apnea.

Van Cauter set out to study the connection between sleep loss and appetite after anecdot-al reports from sleep studies indicated that sub-jects were overeating during extended stays in the laboratory. The common assumption was that they ate because they were bored, but she decided to test that assumption. In the first-ev-er study to make the connection between sleep and appetite, published in 2004 in the Annals of Internal Medicine, Van Cauter’s team brought 12 lean and healthy young men into the lab for two four-hour nights of sleep followed by two 10-hour nights. They found that when the sub-jects slept for only four hours, they showed dra-matic changes in two hormones that regulate appetite.

Blood draws revealed an 18 percent de-crease in leptin, a satiety hormone produced by the stomach that tells the brain when the body has had enough food. They also showed a 28 percent increase in ghrelin, a hunger-causing hormone produced by our fat cells indicating that our energy reserves are running low and need to be replenished.

Taken together, these two hormones boost-ed the young men’s hunger — even though the amount they ate and exercised was the same during their nights of ample sleep. The subjects reported a 24 percent increase in appetite after less sleep, with a special eagerness for chips, cakes and cookies, and breads and pasta.

“This study suggests that there could be long-term consequences with prolonged sleep

Page 8: January 2011

deprivation — especially if you’re trying to con-trol your food intake or stick to a healthy diet,” says Kristen Knutson, PhD, a University of Chicago assistant professor of medicine who’s been involved in many sleep studies. “They were craving junk food, not apples and carrot sticks.”

Sleep researchers have also noted other im-portant biochemical changes that might influ-ence weight gain in people who are chronically sleep deprived. In 1999, Van Cauter and her University of Chicago researchers published a study of young healthy subjects who endured six nights with only four hours of sleep followed by six nights with 12 hours of sleep. During the short sleep days, examinations showed that the subjects’ ability to metabolize glucose was impaired, meaning that their muscles and other tissues weren’t able to remove glucose from the blood effectively.

This sort of sleep-related metabolic disrup-tion can prompt the body to bump up its produc-tion of insulin, a hormone produced by the pan-creas that flows through the blood and binds to our cells, allowing them to absorb glucose en-ergy. Without that action, glucose builds up in the blood and prompts the pancreas to secrete more and more insulin.

Over time, this can create the kind of insulin resistance that marks adult-onset diabetes. Ex-cess insulin also prompts the body to store fat.

Researchers aren’t entirely sure why sleep loss leads to this prediabetic condition, but they have observed that their sleep-stressed subjects have increased activity in their sym-pathetic nervous system, the mechanism that activates the fight-or-flight response. (This acti-vation of the sympathetic nervous system might also account for the preference for junk food among Van Cauter’s sleep-deprived research subjects: Stressed people often crave the quick energy such fare offers.)

When sympathetic nervous activity increas-es, parasympathetic activity — which helps control the function of many of our organs — tends to drop. “Parasympathetic activity has an impact on the pancreas, so if it’s reduced, it’s possible that insulin is not being properly regu-lated,” says Knutson.

During their sleep-deprived state, the sub-

jects also showed an increase in the level of the stress hormone cortisol in the early evening — a sharp contrast to the normal tapering down of this hormone before bedtime. The secretion of growth hormone (GH), which affects growth and metabolism, was also altered: Instead of the normal single burst of this hormone after sleep onset, GH was released twice, before and after sleep.

“These alterations in cortisol and growth hormone could affect insulin sensitivity neg-atively,” explains Knutson. “And that’s a bad thing; we want to be insulin sensitive.” Body-Clock Confusion

Researchers know that sleep deprivation disrupts one of the most basic mechanisms in our body: our internal clock. And, studies show that messing with our internal clock may have serious implications for our weight. We evolved over millions of years shaped by the earth’s cycles of day and night, and light and dark-ness, and our body’s clock still ticks according to those basic cycles.

This clock — often called our circadian rhythm — isn’t just a metaphor. It has a pre-cise location in the brain’s hypothalamus, in two pinhead-size clumps of neurons called the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) that sit above our two optic nerves. The SCN monitors the light coming in through our eyes and, based on the amount and timing of light, regulates vital rhythmic functions throughout the body, includ-ing temperature, the release of hormones, and metabolism.

The brain clock ticks away largely unaffected by the rest of the body — in fact, researchers have removed that portion of the brain from animals and watched as the SCN continues to pulse rhythmically on its own for a while. But the SCN is not the only clock in the body. Al-most every cell has a clock-like function that operates on a 24-hour cycle. The difference between the brain clock and all these others is that the latter can’t operate on their own. They depend on the brain clock to sustain their rhythm.

“We think the main clock is like an orchestra conductor that keeps all the other instruments in time,” says Ilia Karatsoreos, PhD, a postdoc-toral fellow at Rockefeller University’s Labora-

Page 9: January 2011

tory of Neuroendocrinology whose experiments with mice suggest that disrupting their circadi-an rhythms prompts weight gain and impulsive behavior. “Once that conductor is disrupted, it loses its ability to keep these other players in sync with each other. The organs and tissues are then not working as well together as they should be.”

By remaining awake when our biological clock says we should sleep, we risk scrambling the alignment of the internal systems regulated by our SCN — with terrible implications for our weight, among other things.

“All the different organs that regulate me-tabolism have circadian rhythms,” says Phyllis Zee, MD, PhD, professor of neurology and di-rector of the Sleep Disorders Center at North-western University. “And when they’re out of sync, it can expose one to changes in metabo-lism or to choosing inappropriate food or to eat-ing too much.”

Some researchers think late nights fueled by bright lights and glowing computer and TV screens may trick our bodies into thinking we’re in a sort of perpetual summer — a high-activity time when our hunter-gatherer predecessors would have been loading up on readily avail-able carbohydrates in preparation for a long, cold winter.

“Our ancestors’ sleep durations would have been shorter in the summer,” says James Gangwisch, lead author of the Columbia study. And our caloric needs would have been far greater, he explains — both to fuel long days of activity and to accumulate precious fat stores that would carry us through the cold season.

Our modern reality is entirely different, of course. “Now,” notes Gangwisch, “we can have year-round fat deposition, preparing for a win-ter that never comes. It comes, of course, but we’re still warm and can get all the food we want and can still have short sleep durations because we have year-round light exposure.” Playing Catch-up

There are plenty of reasons why we’ve grown so estranged from sleep — despite its obvious health implications. Chief among these is our tendency to work longer hours. “Instead of working 40 hours, people are often working

50 to 60 hours per week,” Knutson says. “You want to have a life outside work, so you pay with sleep time.”

But the body keeps a very exact accounting of the hours needed for sleep. If we build up a sleep “debt” of an hour or two per night, Mon-day through Friday, we’re generally not going to be able to make it up in one weekend. We carry that debt and the burden of sleepiness forward, often not even realizing how sleep im-paired we are.

“Several studies have shown that after cu-mulative sleep deprivation, individuals are no longer able to recognize the degree of sleepi-ness under which they operate,” says Van Cau-ter. “They think they’re OK, but when their per-formance is tested, they fail miserably.”

What we need, say some experts, is a new characterization of sleep — one that doesn’t regard it as a time when we just turn ourselves off. We need a new appreciation of slumber as a part of the environmental metronome guiding important cyclical functions in our body — func-tions that affect our weight, our body chemistry, our neurology and our overall well-being.

Most of us assume the routines of a lean lifestyle — like healthy meals and exercise — are limited to our waking hours. But that point of view leaves out the crucial dark side of our 24-hour cycle, when sleep prepares our bod-ies and minds to function at their best on the following day. It ignores the fact that our bod-ies require adequate downtime to regulate sys-tems that have a direct impact on whether we accumulate unwanted weight, or succeed in evading it — now and over the long haul.

Page 10: January 2011

advertisewith us

click here

Advertising runs for 1 year and includes 4 Full Page, 4 Half Page, and 4 Quarter Page ads. All Full Color and All Fully Interactive. Pricing is as low as $150 per year. The biggest “no brainer” in advertising.

After all - your current and/or potential customer is reading this right now.

Page 11: January 2011
Page 12: January 2011

NO Dry Cleaners companies are supporting your community yet with Special Discounts...

What’s up with that?

advertisewith usclick here

NO Nail Salon companies are supporting your community yet with Special Discounts...

What’s up with that?

advertisewith usclick here

Quick & EasyEclair CakeProvided by: allrecipes.com

By: Cathy Gordon “This is a very quick and simple no bake dessert cake. It uses graham crackers and a pudding mixture. It tastes just like an eclair, but there is enough for a crowd!! It is a great recipe for children who are learning to cook, there is no baking involved or any power kitchen tools. Just a bowl and a spoon!”

Ingredients2 (3.5 ounce) packages instant vanilla pudding mix1 (8 ounce) container frozen whipped topping, thawed3 cups milk1 (16 ounce) package graham cracker squares1 (16 ounce) package prepared chocolate frosting

DirectionsIn a medium bowl, thoroughly blend the pudding mix, whipped topping, and milk.Arrange a single layer of graham cracker squares in the bottom of a 13x9 inch baking pan. Evenly spread half of the pudding mixture over the crackers. Top with another layer of crackers and the remaining pudding mixture. Top with a final layer of graham crackers.Spread the frosting over the whole cake up to the edges of the pan. Cover, and chill at least 4 hours before serving.

Page 13: January 2011
Page 14: January 2011

We have many advertising opportunities in your monthly

Minizine. It’s easy to earn your $50 VISA Gift Card for the Holidays - Tell the places you shop that they need to be advertising in your monthly

community Minizine.

When they call us at 770-886-1881 ext. 101 to advertise, and they tell us you referred them...once they begin

advertising, YOU get a$50 VISA Gift Card!

Earn a$50 VISA Gift Card

NO Car Dealer companies are supporting your community yet with Special Discounts...

What’s up with that?

advertisewith usclick here

Live and Be Passionate For YOU 2011 Plan of Actionby David Wolfe

If you don’t know what you want out of life, there will be plenty of people out there that are ready to tell you. Unfortunately, they have their best interest at heart and rarely have yours in mind.

Take some time these last few weeks of the year and go over what you did in 2010 that was specifical-ly about achieving your personal goals. Did you ac-complish what you planned? Did you have a plan? Did you start a new hobby or keep purusing the hob-by you already had? What did you do this year that was 100% about you and your personal happiness?

If you do not make the time for yourself and take the time to find passion in your own life, there is no-body out there that can or will do it for you. You need to find your personal passions and then explore them. Do what makes you happy. Stop searching for happiness when typically is right in front of your face. Too many times we spend our energy on the negative things in life and the “why not’s.” Why not me? Why can’t that happen to me? Why does he/she always seem to have great things happen to them? Why, why, why?

I’m not going to start preaching about things like The Secret and the importance of spreading posi-tivity around you. I’m not even going to talk about karma. The bottom line is that your life is going to be what you make of it. If you truly want to be hap-py, then you will be happy. The first step is simply finding what you are passionate about and then sur-rounding yourself with whatever that is. Surround yourself with people that have the same passions and values that you have. Stand up for something...stand up for yourself!

I always tell people, be what you want, and be who you want to be...the rest will fall into place. Live and be passionate about what makes you happy. Do not let another year go by with no plan or goals. Take the next few weeks and think about what you need to do for YOU to achieve what you want. Notice all of the “you’s” in that statement? Again, if you don’t know what you want out of life, there are plenty of people out there that are ready to tell you...but then it is all about them.

Page 15: January 2011

A few years back, two sci-entists at the University of Iowa conducted an

experiment in which research sub-jects played a game of chance with four separate card decks and stacks of play money. Each card indicated whether the player had won or lost money, and the goal for the player was to draw as many cash-delivering cards as possible. What the players didn’t know is that the decks had been rigged. Two of them had been stacked so they yielded high rewards but punishing losses, while the other

two offered smaller rewards and virtu-ally no losses. It took most players about 50 cards be-fore they started to favor the safer decks, and about 80 cards before they could explain why they did so.

Here’s the curious part (and am-ateur gamblers should take note): Sensors attached to the players’ skin showed that after only 10 cards, a player’s hand would get sweaty and nervous when it reached for the risky decks. “Although the subject still had little inkling of which card piles were the most lucrative . . . [his] emotions knew which decks were dangerous,” writes Wired contribut-ing editor Jonah Lehrer in How We Decide  (Houghton  Mifflin,  2009). “The  subject’s  feelings  figured  out the game first.”

Most of us have experienced the sense of knowing things before we know them, even if we can’t explain how. You hesitate at a green light and miss getting hit by a speeding truck. You decide on a whim to break your no-blind-dates policy and wind up meeting your life partner. You have a hunch that you should invest in a little online startup and it becomes Google.

The quirky urge. A funny tingle. That little voice in your head. These are your gut feelings talking. But what are they telling you, and should you listen? Here’s how to make the most of your own innate wisdom.

Page 16: January 2011

If only you could tap into those insights more of-ten, right? Turns out you can, especially if you learn to identify which signals to focus on — whether they’re sweaty palms, a funny feeling in your stomach, or a sudden and inexplicable certainty that something is up.

According to many researchers, intuition is far more material than it seems. Hope College social psy-chologist David Myers, PhD, explains that the intuitive right brain is almost always “reading” your surround-ings, even when your conscious left brain is otherwise engaged. The body can register this information while the conscious mind remains blissfully unaware of what’s going on.’

Another theory suggests you can “feel” approach-ing events specifically because of your dopamine neu-rons. “The jitters of dopamine help keep track of real-ity, alerting us to those subtle patterns that we can’t consciously detect,” Lehrer notes.

This means if something in the environment is even slightly irregular — the speed of an approaching truck, the slightly unusual behavior of someone at a party — your brain squirts dopamine and you get that “weird” feeling. Whether you pay attention or not can make all the difference. You might meet your future spouse — or meet your maker. Those signals carry a lot of impor-tant information, so it’s wise to listen up.

Judith Orloff, PhD, a Los Angeles–based intuitive psychiatrist and author of Second Sight (Three Riv-ers Press,  2010),  believes  the benefits  of  listening  to your instincts go far beyond making good on life-or-death decisions. “Living more intuitively demands that you’re in the moment,” she says, “and that makes for a more passionate life.”

But she also notes that gut instincts are far from in-fallible. The right brain’s skill with pattern identifica-tion can trigger suspicions of unfamiliar (but not dan-gerous) things, or cause you to be especially reactive to people who simply remind you of someone else.

So how do you choose which gut feelings to trust? Orloff suggests that it’s a matter of “combining the linear mind and intuition,” and striking the right bal-ance between gut instinct and rational thinking. Once you’ve noticed an intuitive hit, she says, you can en-gage your rational mind to weigh your choices and de-cide how best to act on them.

To that end, here are five gut feelings that Orloff and other experts recommend you pay attention to — and some reasons why you’ll be glad you did.

“Something feels wrong in my body.”

Listening to your body’s subtle signals is a critical part of exercising your intuitive sense, says Orloff, who also trains UCLA

medical students and psychiatric residents to use intu-ition when treating patients.

“Your body is a powerful intuitive communicator,” she explains in Second Sight. “Intuition allows you to get the first warning signs when anything is off in your body so that you can address it. If you have a gut feel-ing about your body — that something is toxic, weak or ‘off’ — listen to it. Go and get it worked up.” She’s seen too many people ignore their sense that something isn’t right with their bodies, and subsequently find that small problems have become big ones.

Physical symptoms can also have symbolic value. “If you’re around somebody and your energy goes down, that’s an intuition not to ignore,” Orloff says. Sudden sleepiness can mean that you’re in the pres-ence of an energy-draining person or circumstance; it can be your body’s way of communicating that these conditions are taking more energy than they give. If you stay in a situation that makes you feel instantly depleted (like taking a job after you left the interview feeling exhausted), it can easily lead to a situation where you become depressed, anxious and — not sur-prisingly — stuck.

Ronald A. Alexander, PhD, a psychologist, mind-fulness expert, leadership consultant, and director of the Open Mind Training Institute in Santa Monica, Calif., also recommends paying close attention to any sudden physical sensations you experience during the course of an interaction. He tells a story of traveling in India where he decided not to get in a cab because of a “burning sensation” in his gut, and he later saw the driver being arrested in the train station for sus-pected robbery. He says he typically feels intuitions in his chest or his stomach; the latter is relatively com-mon given that the intestines house the enteric nervous system, sometimes called the “second brain.”

“That second brain really is the intuitive brain,” Alexander explains, and he recommends that when it

speaks, you listen.

“I’m in danger.”

Jackie Larsen was leaving her Grand Marais, Minn., prayer-group meeting on

an April morning in 2001 when a clean-cut young man named Christopher Bono approached her, asking for help. He told her that he was on his way to meet friends

1.

2.

Page 17: January 2011

in Thunder Bay, and his car had broken down. Dur-ing their brief conversation, she got a visceral feeling that something was wrong, accompanied by a sharp pain in her stomach. She sent Bono inside to talk to the pastor of the church and called the police to have them trace his Illinois license plates. It turned out he was the prime suspect in a gruesome crime and was fleeing the scene.

Larsen’s brain had likely detected subtle irregulari-ties in Bono’s behavior. “Mere ‘thin-slices’ of some-one’s behavior can reveal much,” writes Myers, who relates Larsen’s story in his book Intuition: Its Pow-ers and Perils (Yale University Press, 2002). His un-derstanding of this capacity is more socio-historical than  neuroscientific;  he  believes  that  the  feeling  you get about a person in the first 10 seconds expresses an “ancient biological wisdom.” Early humans who could speedily detect whether a stranger was friend or foe were more likely to survive, he says, and they would create descendents who were able to read emotional signals in another person’s face almost instantly.

Of course, the human capacity to “thin-slice” can go badly awry, as it did in the 1999 fatal police shooting of Amadou Diallo in New York City. Police fired when they thought the young Guinean man was reaching for a weapon, but he was actually unarmed and digging in his pocket for his identification.

Because social conditioning helps to create uncon-scious beliefs, and these beliefs can produce first im-pressions  and  snap  decisions  that  are  utterly  flawed, Orloff suggests that it’s important to check your gut feelings against your rational mind whenever possible. And there are simple ways you can attend to what feels like a warning signal in the short term, she says.

“If you don’t trust somebody, even if it turns out to be inaccurate, it is something to pay attention to,” she explains. “If you’re walking down the street at night and you get the feeling ‘stay away from that person,’

just cross the street.”

“I want to help.”

While you might think of our gut in-stincts as something we’ve maintained

mostly to avoid danger, the human species has evolved an equally powerful capacity to sense when our fellow beings need support. “Sympathy is one of humanity’s most basic instincts, which is why evolution lavished so much attention on the parts of the brain that help us think about what other people are feeling,” notes Lehrer.

Since evolution has made you a quick read of other faces and their emotional signals, you don’t always need to wait for a verbalized cue before you reach out. The sympathy instinct nudges you to change the subject when wedding talk makes a newly divorced colleague cringe, or to start up a conversation with a nervous seatmate during an airplane landing — subtle gestures that can make a big difference in someone’s day. The capacity to empathetically identify with other faces can even be what compels you to donate money after a natural disaster. Studies of humanitarian relief efforts show that people are markedly more compelled to give after seeing a photo of an individual in need than after reading statistics about damage.

Finally, this ability to “read” other faces isn’t just good for those you help. One recent brain-imaging study suggests that generosity makes the pleasure cen-ters in the brain light up like the Las Vegas Strip. When participants were given $128 of hard cash along with the choice to keep it or donate it to charity, the reward centers of those who chose to donate went wild.

Multiple studies have also demonstrated a phenom-enon known as the “helper’s high,” which causes indi-viduals aiding others to experience improvements in mood, immunity and overall well-being. That’s why following your instincts for sympathy and generosity generally turns out to be a good investment in your

own health and happiness, too.

“I know how to do this.”

Basketball announcers can be mer-ciless when otherwise talented players

choke at the free-throw line, but most of us can iden-tify with the player’s sense of panic. You might have a well-developed yoga practice with one pose that still stumps you. Or maybe you’re a stellar driver who forgets how to parallel park whenever your intimidat-ing sister-in-law is in the car. Or you’re a great cook who botches your favorite dish each time you make it for guests. In situations like these, the can-do instinct you’ve developed through years of experience is being drowned out by an onslaught of over-thinking.

“Choking [among athletes] is a vivid example of the havoc that can be caused by too much thought,” Lehrer points out. “Such deliberate thought processes interfere with the trained movements of their muscles.”

He cites a study at the University of Chicago show-ing that, while novice golfers did better when they thought carefully about their putts, the performance of more experienced golfers got much worse when they reflected on what they were doing.

3.

4.

Page 18: January 2011

Rational thought served the beginners; it turned out, because they were still developing muscle memory and technique. But for those players who had already integrated all that information, instinct naturally took over — and did a far better job. Overriding instincts and neural patterning in favor of logical thought abso-lutely destroyed their performance.

“Once you’ve developed expertise in a particular area — once you’ve made the requisite mistakes — it’s important to trust your emotions when making deci-sions in that domain,” Lehrer insists. If you know you can do it, trust your gut — not your head.

Next time you’re tempted to think too much about something you know how to do, try a little therapeu-tic distraction. Say the alphabet backward when your yoga teacher orders you into the dreaded handstand, or sing a favorite song to yourself at the free-throw line. Briefly engaging your conscious mind with something other than the task at hand can leave your instincts free to do their job — and free you to enjoy the satisfaction all that practice has made possible.

“This is it!”

Most people have a great “I just knew it was right” story. It might be about the time they first spotted their sweetheart or 

crossed the threshold of their first house or figured out they wanted to switch careers. There’s a reason most of us have memorable stories about the biggest and best decisions we make in life, says Orloff — they’re typically remarkable for their lack of cognitive heavy lifting.

When your intuition signals that you’ve found something or someone truly right for you, the choice often becomes strangely easy. “It feels healthy; it feels good; it doesn’t feel like you’re forcing it, there’s not a lot of conflict,” she says.

Lehrer agrees that when you’re poised to make a big decision with lasting repercussions, like choosing your life partner, you’re best off deciding from the gut. Based on the bulk of his research into the cognitive mechanisms of decision-making, he actually recom-mends that you “think less about those choices that you care a lot about.”

According to Lehrer, the rational mind is really suit-ed only to limited concrete choices, like deciding be-tween two brands of car insurance. In situations where there are just a couple of relevant factors involved, the prefrontal cortex can weigh the comparative rewards of each and yield an excellent result. But there are so

many factors involved in a complex decision like, say, buying a house, that the limited space in the prefrontal cortex gets overwhelmed. In that state, it becomes the wrong part of the brain for the job.

Several studies support the wisdom of emotional decision-making in the realm of big choices. Lehrer cites one conducted at the University of Amsterdam that simulated the experience of buying a car, provid-ing research subjects with overwhelming amounts of detailed information. Some car buyers were briefly dis-tracted, then left to choose quickly and with their emo-tions. Follow-up surveys revealed that they selected the most satisfying car 60 percent of the time. Other subjects who had more uninterrupted time in which to choose were pleased with  their decision  less  than 25 percent of the time — worse even than random chance.

In another study, the same Dutch researchers shad-owed shoppers at IKEA, observing their shopping behaviors. Later interviews indicated that those who spent less time making their choices ended up more satisfied  overall.  Choosing  a  couch  and  choosing  a spouse are decidedly different acts, to be sure, but both tend to provoke the kind of agonized over-thinking that leads to poor choices. Using your intuitive brain in these situations, on the other hand, will almost always point you toward a lasting fulfillment.

Of all the reasons to use your gut instincts to make big decisions, this may be the best: It leads to the choices that are most fully satisfying — decisions that can improve the quality of your life.

“It allows you to find relationships that resonate for you, instead of what looks good on paper,” Orloff says. “It allows you to connect with people on a heart level, it allows you to deeply experience life instead of just letting it wash over you, and it allows you to be really smart about how you make your decisions.”

5.

Page 19: January 2011
Page 20: January 2011

DEALSW3

GET READY - IT’S COMINGfacebook.com/w3deals

50% Savings...

Page 21: January 2011

Intuitive Eating for Weight Loss

As an alternative to doomed diet regimens, some weight-loss experts recommend tuning in to our own instincts. But are our bodies’ cravings always a good guide?

It was more than a decade ago, before the obesity epidemic had even peaked, that nutritionists Evelyn

Tribole, MS, RD, and Elyse Resch, MS, RD, FADA, noticed the stream of failed dieters traipsing through their offices, many of them desperate for help.

Aware that dieting pitfalls — from ravenous hunger to outright boredom — might be part of the problem, the nutritionists gave their clients permission to indulge some cravings, but nonetheless kept them on programs that limited food intake. Eager to please, the clients followed the meal plans and initially lost weight.

But, Tribole recalls, “Sometime later we started getting calls from some of these people telling us how much they needed us again. They couldn’t stick to the plan anymore. Maybe they needed someone to monitor them. Maybe they didn’t have enough self-control. Maybe they weren’t any good at this, and definitely, they felt guilty and demoralized.”

Looking around, the two nutritionists saw the writing on the wall — and in the medical journals, too: Something like 95 percent of dieters fail to stick with their weight-loss programs, from Weight Watchers to Atkins to Jenny Craig.

Determined to find a different approach, they first looked to the anti-diet movement, which was just then burgeoning as a backlash to the war against obesity.

“The anti-diet movement proposed a way of eating that allowed for any and all food choices, without regard for nutrition,” Tribole explains. It was a philosophy at loggerheads with literature linking excess pounds to cancer, heart disease, diabetes and more — and it ran counter to Tribole’s and Resch’s own instincts.

“Our initial reactions were highly skeptical,” says Tribole. “How could we, as nutritionists, trained to look at the connections between nutrition and health, sanction a way of eating that seemed to reject the very foundation of our knowledge and philosophy?”

Eventually, Tribole and Resch determined that they could resolve the conflict by hammering out a

compromise of sorts. They called it “Intuitive Eating” — a nutritional strategy that rejected dieting in favor of psychological awareness. In particular, it emphasized the importance of increasing clients’ sensitivity to internal signals of hunger and fullness and helping them develop a greater attunement to the physiological effects of the foods they ate.

Described in their influential book, Intuitive Eating: A Revolutionary Program That Works (St. Martin’s Griffin, 2003), the system taught users to distinguish between physical hunger and emotional need, and to trust that natural urges would deliver better health and balance than any diet could.

The concepts were controversial. Clients in Tribole and Resch’s intuitive eating program were free

to eat as much as they wanted and to indulge their cravings for food. While diets were all about restriction — calorie counting, weigh-ins, denial of pleasure — intuitive eating gave permission to eat anything. A slice

of cake? A pizza party? It was all allowed.

But can a system so permissive really keep weight down? To some extent, the jury is still out. Expert opinion has been mixed. Intuitive eating clearly doesn’t work for everyone. Yet, thousands of people report losing weight based on intuitive eating, and in recent years, peer-reviewed studies have supported the claims.

Not only did intuitive eaters in recent studies have lower cholesterol, less diabetes, healthier hearts, better levels of fitness, and lower body mass index (BMI), they achieved all that without the psychological stress and self-loathing that dieting can bring on.

According to Tracy Tylka, PhD, a psychologist at Ohio State University whose research has lent rigor to the field, the women participating in her intuitive-eating study were “more likely to reject the societal stereotype

Page 22: January 2011

These positive results make sense in light of evidence that dietary restrictions disrupt homeostasis, a series of metabolic feedback loops between the gut, liver, brain and the body’s cells that help to maintain internal equilibrium. Intuitive eating has a shot at succeeding where restrictive diets fail, say proponents, because it complements rather than fights the complex biology of hunger. It does so by building conscious awareness of hunger cues honed by evolution over millions of years.

Science Weighs In

Until recently, evidence that intuitive eating promoted weight loss was largely testimonial, but a group of studies published in the last few years has lent more credence to the claims.

Especially influential is research from Tylka. Before investigating intuitive eating, Tylka specialized in people with eating disorders, focusing on those who fell along the spectrum of disordered eating without being symptomatic enough to actually be diagnosed. Some 40 percent of Americans qualified for this broader category, she found.

As a group, these people were often unhappy, obsessed with their weight and suffering from body-image problems, whether they were overweight or not.

Those who didn’t fall on the spectrum, she discovered, seemed to be intuitive eaters whose habits resembled those of the people Tribole and Resch had described in their book.

By 2006, Tylka had laid the scientific basis for researching the eating style. She created a scale that defined and then measured the traits of intuitive eaters: Those who qualified could be defined by 21 traits in three broad categories, including unconditional permission to eat, eating from physical rather than emotional cues, and relying on internal hunger and satiety cues.

Tylka used her scale to study more than 1,400 people, determining that intuitive eaters have a higher sense of well-being and lower body weight and do not seem to internalize the “thin ideal.” Later research on 1,260 college women found intuitive eaters shared a series of empowering traits: They were optimistic and resilient, skilled at social problem solving, and had good self-esteem.

A study Tylka published in 2010 showed that parental pressure to restrict eating in childhood translated to higher BMI in adults. The pressure backfired by disconnecting individuals from their natural hunger and satiety cues, she posits. Indeed, her adult participants

reported “a lower tendency to eat when physically hungry and stop eating when full.”

While the studies can’t really prove causality — no one can say whether eating styles are determined by life circumstances and personality traits, or vice versa — Tylka sees the relationship as “bidirectional.” She sums up her findings this way: “Attending to physiological signals of hunger and satiety are uniquely connected to well-being, and to lower body mass.”

Hungry Hormones

No matter where experts stand on intuitive eating, they universally agree that restrictive diets have failed, en masse. Most of the diets we tap today are still rooted in the old “calories in, calories out” model — a straightforward equation in which every morsel of food and every iota of exercise is evaluated on the basis of its caloric value. This mechanistic formula implies that the overweight among us must simply be too lazy, ignorant or lacking in self-control to regulate themselves accordingly, and are thus entirely responsible for their

own plight.

But important new research has proven this line of thinking quite wrong, and that’s one reason intuitive eating is getting a second look from experts who might previously have written it off.

What the new research shows, according to George Blackburn,

MD, PhD, director of the Center for the Study of Nutrition Medicine at Harvard Medical School, is that the stomach

and other metabolically critical parts of the body don’t just process foodborne calories. Rather, they are responsible for sending dozens of chemical and hormonal messages to the brain, where what we think of as hunger really resides.

One key hormone in this system is ghrelin, the only biomolecule found to stimulate the hunger center in the hypothalamus of the brain. Ghrelin is released from the stomach in response not only to physiological hunger — triggered when cells are short on energy — but also to pleasure seeking and stress.

Experiments have shown that people injected with ghrelin eat 30 percent more — perhaps because the hormone gravitates to the same brain area responsible for addictive behaviors. Conventional diets based on calorie restriction limit energy to cells, boosting ghrelin and driving hunger that may be almost impossible to resist as time goes on.

Ever wonder why you overeat when stressed out? The stress hormone, cortisol, triggers the body to produce

“Ever wonder why you

overeat when stressed

out?”

Page 23: January 2011

extra ghrelin. That ghrelin works on the brain’s pleasure centers to calm you down, but you pay the price in extra weight.

Then there’s leptin, one of a series of “satiety hormones” produced by fat cells that tell the brain it’s time to put your fork down. There was a time when scientists celebrated the discovery of leptin, hoping that supplements would suppress appetite and keep weight under control. But for the overweight, leptin is a dead end; levels are already elevated in the obese, but their cell receptors are resistant, much like diabetics are resistant to insulin.

The obese have plenty of leptin, in other words, but it no longer has an effective place to land. The chemistry is complex, but the takeaway message for lifelong dieters is disturbingly simple: Calorie restriction elevates ghrelin, driving the hunger that sparks overeating and weight gain. The situation worsens as the failed diets stack up and the years go by. The resulting obesity renders the brain resistant to leptin, the very hormone that is supposed to help put the brakes on our appetites.

Cultivating Consciousness

Greeting our desire for food with conscious awareness rather than white-knuckled self-control is an essential priority of intuitive eating — in part because most of us have been socially and environmentally programmed to eat without much consciousness at all.

“Food is everywhere in brightly colored packages,” observes Lynn Rossy, PhD, a health psychologist who teaches mindfulness in her intuitive-eating workshops at the T. E. Atkins University of Missouri Wellness Program in Columbia. “But what is in the food, and how are we using it? Are we hungry or full when we decide to eat? Are we eating to disengage from our emotions, or to get pleasure? Are we eating when we are really hungry for something else that we would find by looking to other parts of our lives? We make so many food choices every day, but we’re so busy we’re not paying attention. In order for someone to become an intuitive eater, that has to change.”

Intuitive eaters must tune in to not just hunger and satiety, but also mood. “Emotion can impact the digestive system and mimic the feelings of hunger,” explains Rossy, “but practicing mindfulness can help you tell the difference. It gets easier over time.”

Susan Albers, PsyD, author of Eating Mindfully: How to End Mindless Eating and Enjoy a Balanced Relationship with Food (New Harbinger, 2003), found that intuitive eaters can often handle cravings just by slowing down. As with other forms of impulse, simply stopping to ponder the source of a craving can help you realize that it isn’t about hunger at all.

Food can be a drug, she explains, in that it stimulates the feel-good neurotransmitter, serotonin. But those mindful enough to grasp that they are eating to boost mood, not appease hunger, can seek the fix through a healthy alternative like exercise, meditation or social connection.

The key, says Albers, is awareness: “If you remove that comfort eating, you must consciously put something

back to take its place, be it meditation or massage. The mindful eater recognizes and respects physiological hunger — if you are really hungry, it is important to respond.”

Nutrition consultant Marc David, MA, author of The Slow Down Diet: Eating for Pleasure, Energy & Weight Loss (Healing Arts, 2005), has his clients focus on the quality of the food itself. His rationale is simple: Higher-quality food — real, fresh, flavorful and organic — is nutrient dense and inherently satisfying.

“Yes, many of us eat too much,” says David, founder and director of the Boulder, Colo.–based Institute for the Psychology of Eating. “But we do so, to a degree, because our food is nutrient deficient. It lacks the vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and all the

undiscovered X-factors and energies we require. The brain senses these deficiencies and wisely responds to this absence of vital chemistry by commanding us to undertake the most sensible survival strategy: Eat more food.”

One key to getting such cravings under control, David asserts, may simply be to upgrade the quality of the food we eat, then notice how we experience it. “Stop and see how you feel following every meal,” he suggests.

Not for Everybody

In the end, only you can intuit which foods are right for you — and whether your cravings are driven by a

Page 24: January 2011

such things, and motivated to do so, you may have success with intuitive eating as a weight-loss strategy.

Critics of intuitive eating point out, though, that for many, the approach has some very real limitations. For one thing, notes Elson Haas, MD, some people crave the very foods that are making them sick — much like an addict may crave a drug, despite the overall damage that it does. Indulging cravings for those foods could set you up for an inflammatory and immune response that worsens biochemical imbalances rather than ameliorating them. Even nutritious foods like yogurt, nuts and whole grains are not going to produce good results for those folks who have allergies or intolerances to them.

Also, cravings for sugar, dairy products and caffeine do not typically abate with indulgence, Haas notes, but instead tend to drive inflammation, water retention, brain fog — and still more craving.

The only way out of that rut, says Haas, author of The False Fat Diet: The Revolutionary 21-Day Program for Losing the Weight You Think Is Fat (Ballantine Books, 2001), is to heal and re-regulate the body’s disrupted biochemistry. This necessarily involves a certain amount of self-control in the short term, he notes, but for a totally different and arguably better reason than controlling calories. The goal here is to clear your system of the biochemical factors that are confounding it — and your weight-loss efforts.

Even without an allergy or food addiction, though, intuitive eating may be hard to master for the

obese, many of whom may struggle with imbalances in blood sugar and brain chemistry that have become entrenched by years of dysfunctional eating. Such imbalances can effectively compromise the body-based intuition that individuals require to put intuitive eating techniques to work.

That was part of the message when the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior held its annual meeting in Pittsburgh this July. University of Illinois researchers reported that a diet consistently high in fat restricted the neurotransmitter dopamine in the striatum (the part of the brain associated with reward). The upshot was that rats on high-fat fare had to eat more than their brethren on a low-fat diet for the same sense of reward.

University of Pennsylvania researchers reported that leptin — the fullness hormone — activates the hippocampus, and this process may be impaired by obesity, making it harder for obese individuals to muster self-control.

And Yale scientists scanned the brains of human subjects exposed to the smell and taste of food: The brains of normal-weight participants reacted

differently, depending on their level of hunger. But obese participants’ brains reacted to taste and smell no matter what the status of their hunger, driving them to eat long after getting full.

So, is intuitive eating for you? Only you can decide. If you’re out to maintain your weight or drop a few pounds, intuitive eating may be an ideal strategy. If you’ve experienced little luck with restrictive dieting in the past, intuitive eating may help you rethink your whole approach to food. But if you are obese or dealing with disrupted biochemistry as the result of food intolerances, you may want to seek some professional nutrition counseling to rebalance your body and brain before you give intuitive eating a try.

Either way, keep in mind that intuitive eating is a package deal — the practices of conscious attention can’t be separated from the “eat what you like” philosophy. You can’t just cave in to cravings without being willing to question them first.

Nor can intuitive eating be practiced effectively in a vacuum devoid of sensible food practices. For example, Haas notes, “Planning ahead with a good menu enables you to have healthy foods available when you need them” — something that may be tough to pull off if you always eat on the spur of the moment.

All of us, though, could probably benefit from tuning in to our bodies more often. “The body has spectacular wisdom,” says Marc David. “We just have to listen to

Page 25: January 2011

Please tell me what ever happened to Personal Accountability? Our society seemingly has gotten more and more about pointing fingers rather than taking accountability and coming up with solutions. It happens on many levels, whether it is at work, in our personal lives or criticizing a politician. No matter at what level – finger pointing has become the “norm.” Aggravating to most, but still happens on a daily basis.

Lack of personal accountability has become a problem resulting in an epidemic of blame, complaining, and procrastination. No organization or individual can achieve goals, compete in the marketplace, fulfill a vision, or develop people and teams without personal accountability

The author says this book is for anyone that has heard questions like these:

•  “When is that department going to do its job?”

•  “Why don’t they communicate better?”

•  Who dropped the ball?”

•  “Why do we have to go through all this change?”

•  “When is someone going to train me?”

However, in my opinion, this book is for everyone. Each and every one of us can always use a reminder of how important personal accountability is to our own personal successes. The book helps the reader to recognize and ask better questions. Miller points out that every question should always Focus on Action. Sounds simple and obvious; however, take a day and listen to most questions that are asked – typically they focus on “Why,” “When,” and “Who.” The answer to which almost never truly results in action to solve the challenge or opportunity at hand. Another great way he refers to the “Why” question is – Victim

Thinking. Empower yourself to handle situations as they present themselves and don’t succumb to the situation by becoming the victim. As Miller quotes, “The best thing we can do to get rid of victim thinking in our world is to get rid of it in ourselves.”

This book is excellent in pointing out that communication is about much more than how we speak or what we say, but even more importantly is how we listen and how we understand the person speaking to us. Asking the question “How can I better understand you” is a perfect example of this. After all, if we are talking to someone but can’t understand what they are telling us…then what is the point?

The great thing about this book is that it is an quick and easy read full of practical methods for putting personal accountability into daily action that will produce immediate results. It is only 115 pages and I read 97 pages in my first sitting.  The pages are small and the text is large and is written in more of a conversational style rather than as an instructional manual. Using this tool, each of us can add tremendous worth to our organizations and to our lives by eliminating blame, complaining, and procrastination.

Enjoy QBQ! – The Question Behind the Question and share it with others in your life because as Alvin Toffler says; “The illiterate of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read or write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”

QBQ! The Question Behind the Question

by John MillerReview by David Wolfe

Page 26: January 2011

Tell Your Friends!

ONLY The Best of The Best in Apartment Communities can hold the National Apartment Desigation as being a W3 Lifestyle

designated Community. Community performance is then monitored on a monthly basis.

Visit Us Online: www.W3Lifestyle.comWant to Share your Experience? Call 770-886-1881 ext. 0

Spread The Word about W3 Lifestyle Designation

Apartment Communities cannot “buy” their designation, they must earn it. As a third party who evaluates communities as our specialty, we have already done the leg work for apartment renters. Tell your friends and family when they are ready to lease their new apartment home - look for the

designation of excellence, W3 Lifestyle. ONLY W3 Lifestyle designated communities are evaluated and then monitored monthly for excellence. Experience a W3 Lifestyle...

National Apartment DesignationSome of the Criteria for Initial Designation:- Provide Superior Resident Services- Provide Superior Product Quality- Commit to Consistent Resident Events- Commit to Superior Resident Communication

All Designated Communities are Monitered Monthly

Best of The Best inApartment CommunitiesExperience a W3 Lifestyle...