jan-jun 2018€¦ · classiﬁcation of total detections to different types of malware groups...

1

Classification of total detections to different types of malware groups Executables are responsible for 80% of total detections on average while Fileless, Lateral Movement and Document attacks are resposible for 20% of total detections DETECTION CLASSIFICATION 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Executables Lateral Movement Fileless Documents RANSOMWARE TREND JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 10.5 14.4 11.8 7.4 12.6 5.6 Ransomware detections (per 1000 endpoints) Ransomware attacks remain popular ranging from 5.6 to 14.4 attacks per 1000 endpoints Classification of total detections by the verdict given by reputation services More than 70% of total detections were unknown to reputation services Classification of detected executables by the verdict given by reputation services More than 70% of detected executables were unknown to reputation services Classification of detected documents by the verdict given by reputation services More than 90% of detected documents were unknown to reputation services Executable detections compared to reputation services Document detections compared to reputation services Total detections compared to reputation services FILELESS TREND Fileless attack detections (per 1000 endpoints) Fileless attacks rose by 94% evidencing increasing prevalance 25.4 27 26 33.8 42.5 21.9 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN POWERSHELL TREND PowerShell attack detections (per 1000 endpoints) PowerShell attacks jumped in June 2018 to a record of 5.2 attacks per 1000 endpoints 4.6 1.5 1.6 3.2 2.5 5.2 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN * Reputation services: VirusTotal, ReversingLabs, and others * Calculated results are normalized to 1,000 endpoints JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JAN-JUN 2018 Dataset sourced from SentinelOne’s global endpoint deployment Enterprise Risk Index Report Jan-Jun 2018

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JAN-JUN 2018€¦ · Classiﬁcation of total detections to different types of malware groups Executables are responsible for 80% of total detections on average while Fileless, Lateral

Classification of total detections to

different types of malware groups

Executables are responsible for 80% of total detections on average while Fileless, Lateral Movement and Document attacks are resposible for 20% of total detections

DETECTION CLASSIFICATION 100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Executables

Lateral Movement

Fileless

Documents

RANSOMWARE TREND

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

10.5

14.4

11.8

7.4

12.6

5.6

Ransomware detections(per 1000 endpoints)

Ransomware attacks remain popular ranging from

5.6 to 14.4 attacks per 1000 endpoints

Classification of total detections by the verdict given by reputation services

More than 70% of total detections were

unknown to reputation services

Classification of detected executables by the verdict given by reputation services

More than 70% of detected executables

were unknown to reputation services

Classification of detected documents by the verdict given by reputation services

More than 90% of detected documents

were unknown to reputation services

Executable detections compared to reputation services

Document detections compared to reputation services

Total detections compared to reputation services

FILELESS TREND

Fileless attack detections(per 1000 endpoints)

Fileless attacks rose by 94%

evidencing increasing prevalance

25.4 27 26

33.842.5

21.9

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

POWERSHELL TREND

PowerShell attack detections(per 1000 endpoints)

PowerShell attacks jumped in June 2018 to

a record of 5.2 attacks per 1000 endpoints

4.6

1.5 1.6

3.2

2.5

5.2

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

* Reputation services: VirusTotal, ReversingLabs, and others

* Calculated results are normalized to 1,000 endpoints

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

JAN-JUN 2018

Dataset sourced from SentinelOne’s global endpoint deploymentEnterprise Risk Index Report Jan-Jun 2018

Building Anomaly Detections Systems

Detecting Malicious Executables

Living off the land and fileless attack techniques

Executables and Linking

SLAM with fleeting detections

The Evolution of the Fileless Click-Fraud Malware Poweliks

Comparative Study of Fileless Ransomware

CodeSurfer / x86 A Platform for Analyzing x86 Executables

Pimp My PE: Parsing Malicious and Malformed Executables

Visualizing Compiled Executables - VizSec · Visualizing Compiled Executables ... • “Ether: Malware Analysis via Hardware Virtualization Extensions” Dinaburg, Royal, Sharif,

Securing Containers, Serverless and VMs for Cloud Native ...€¦ · AWS Lambda functions, provides protection against malicious executables, controls the types of executables that

Beyond Whitelisting: Fileless Attacks Against Linux · 2019-03-05 · Fileless Malware - Definition “… a variant of computer related malicious software that exists exclusively

An emerging threat Fileless malware: a survey and research ... · detection system. The fileless malware attack is catastrophic for any enterprise because of its persistence, and

(160820) #fitalk fileless malware forensics

MorphisecUnified Threat Prevention · Built to Defeat Fileless Attacks Fileless, in-memory attacks evade detection by co-opting legitimate system resources. They are 10x more likely

Fileless malware beyond a cursory glance - def.camp - Fileless... · Fileless malware beyond a cursory glance Alin PUNCIOIU Lucian SARARU. Title: Flowchart Example 04 Author: Secureworks

Crate - ruby based standalone executables

Understanding Fileless Attacks on Linux-based IoT …MobiSys'19...ing. Recently, fileless attacks—attacks that do not rely on malware files—have been increasing on Linux-based

202009101030 FileLess Malware TLPWhite · 2020. 9. 10. · Agenda TLP: WHITE, ID# 202009101030 2 • Executive Summary • What is Fileless Malware • What makes it different than

NYESCO ENERGY SERVICE LTD2.Gas detections, heat detections, air quality monitoring devices and flammable detections equipment; this includes single sensor gas detector, multigas detector,

Respiratory Virus Detections in Canada

Fileless attacks - Bitdefender · Fileless attacks Fileless Attacks - White Paper Hackers are increasingly turning to fileless attacks because they are 10 times more likely to succeed

Understanding Fileless Attacks on Linux-based IoT Devices ...alfchen/fan_mobisys19.pdfUnderstanding Fileless Attacks on Linux-based IoT Devices with ... was under DDoS attack by Mirai,

Static Slicing of Binary Executables with DynInst

Fileless WannaMine Cryptojacking Malware Using NSA Exploit

Under the Radar T h e Future of Unde tected Malware · Sorebrect has most of its detections in APAC, however there are a few countries in EMEA that have detected the fileless ransomware,

SYMBOL TABLES &CODE GENERATION FOR EXECUTABLES

Static Analysis of Executables to Detect Malicious Patternspages.cs.wisc.edu/~jha/jha-papers/security/usenix_2003_tr.pdf · Static Analysis of Executables to Detect Malicious Patterns

Testing Heuristic Detections

An approach towards disassembly of malicious binary executables

Playing Hide and Seek with Dalvik Executables · 2016-05-26 · Playing Hide and Seek with Dalvik Executables Axelle Apvrille Hack.Lu, October 2013

Compiling Haskell to LLVM · Introduction Implementation Results Conclusion Generation of executables Generation of executables for Haskell Scope Typical compiler pipeline if x

Threat Bulletin Fileless Malware The Stealth Attacker · Threat Bulletin See. Control. Secure. Fileless Malware - The Stealth Attacker Fileless malware (FM), aka “non-malware”,

54 Signed Executables

One-Click Fileless Infection - Virus Bulletin · Notable Fileless Malwares (early) •Poweliks –Discovered in 2014, from Wowliks to Poweliks –Uses powershell to launch and injects