jackson county school district “raising the standard ”

Jackson County School District“Raising the Standard”Accountability Data 2013

Raising the Standard

2012 -2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Language Arts

Score Minimal Basic Prof Adv QDI

District 8.23 19.11 45.33 27.24 190

ECUE 154.7 6.42 20.18 48.17 25.23 192

SMEE 155.2 7.10 21.89 39.05 31.95 195

SMNE 155.2 9.74 10.39 50.65 29.22 199

VUE 152.8 10.29 22.86 42.86 24.0 181

2012 - 2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Math

Score Minimal Basic Prof Adv QDI

DISTRICT 2.51 15.64 50.42 31.42 208

ECUE 159.5 1.85 1157 55.56 31.02 214

SMEE 159.8 3.53 14.12 45.88 36.47 215

SMNE 159.4 1.95 16.23 45.45 36.36 216

VUE 156.8 2.86 21.71 52.57 22.86 196

2012 - 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Language Arts

Score GR Min Basic Prof. Adv. QDI

DISTRICT 7.51 24.47 44.74 23.27 184

ECUE 153.8 1 7.53 22.58 46.77 23.12 186

SMUE 153.4 0 8.24 23.66 44.80 23.30 182

VUE 153.8 2.3 6.53 26.63 43.22 23.62 184

2012 – 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Mathematics


DISTRICT 5.71 15.64 62.86 15.79 187

ECUE 156.2 .5 4.86 14.05 66.49 14.59 190

SMUE 156.3 .5 5.73 14.70 63.08 16.49 190

VUE 155.8 1.9 6.53 17.59 59.80 16.08 186

2012 - 2013 5th Grade Language Arts


DISTRICT 7.93 23.20 54.18 14.70 174

ECUE 152.9 0.7 7.85 24.61 52.36 15.18 175

SMUE 153.9 1.1 6.43 21.22 57.23 15.11 181

VUE 152.7 -0.5 10.22 24.19 51.61 13.98 169

2012 - 2013 5th Grade Mathematics


DISTRICT 5.77 18.47 52.09 23.67 192

ECUE 157.5 3.2 4.71 15.71 55.50 24.08 199

SMUE 156.2 2.2 5.48 19.03 50.97 24.52 194

VUE 155.3 1.5 7.53 2043 50.0 22.04 186

2012 – 2013 Grade 5 Science (MST)


DISTRICT 5.22 17.25 46.67 30.87 202

ECUE 157.1 n/a 3.70 11.64 52.38 32.28 213

SMUE 155.8 n/a 5.19 18.83 42.53 33.44 204

VUE 154.2 n/a 6.42 20.32 47.06 26.20 193



DISTRICT 5.89 23.42 58.49 12.19 176

ECMS 154.3 2.6 4.50 23.50 62.50 9.50 177

SMMS 156.9 4.7 3.98 18.96 59.94 17.13 191

VMS 151.2 -0.4 10.10 29.80 53.03 7.07 157



DISTRICT 9.63 19.26 54.33 16.78 176

ECMS 152.4 -1.3 9.09 22.22 58.59 10.10 167

SMMS 155.3 1.6 8.59 18.10 53.68 19.63 184

VMS 154.0 1.0 11.11 18.18 51.52 19.19 179



DISTRICT 9.99 19.69 64.08 6.24 166

ECMS 151.3 -0.4 15.20 24.51 52.94 7.35 153

SMMS 154.0 1.1 8.64 16.67 68.52 6.17 172

VMS 154.0 1.3 5.79 20.22 68.95 5.26 174



DISTRICT 13.73 19.14 49.24 17.89 170

ECMS 152.2 -1.1 16.67 22.55 43.63 17.16 161

SMMS 154.1 -0.8 12.04 16.05 52.25 16.67 174

VMS 153.8 -0.7 13.16 20.53 45.26 21.05 177



DISTRICT 9.32 29.88 50.44 10.36 159

ECMS 152.1 -0.7 9.94 26.63 57.79 6.53 162

SMMS 152.5 0.6 9.06 31.71 46.34 12.89 162

VMS 152.1 -0.6 10.05 30.16 49.21 10.58 160



DISTRICT 9.01 14.48 53.62 22.90 187

ECMS 155.9 1.5 6.53 16.08 54.27 23.12 194

SMMS 156.2 2.9 9.03 13.54 50.35 27.08 195

VMS 154.1 0.3 11.64 13.76 58.2 16.40 180

2012 – 2013 Grade 8 Science (MST)


DISTRICT 9.62 18.93 51.18 20.27 180

ECMS 153.7 n/a 10.95 18.91 52.74 17.41 177

SMMS 154.7 n/a 9.09 15.73 53.85 21.33 187

VMS 153.9 n/a 9.04 23.40 45.74 21.81 180

2012 - 2013 8th Grade Algebra I


ECMS 667.3 -4.3 0 0 8.70 91.30 291

SMMS 671.7 -1 0 0 0 100 300

VMS 671.8 -1.2 0 0 5.88 94.12 294

2012 - 2013 Algebra I (High School)


3.82 6.88 40.67 48.62 234

ECHS 659.7 2.1 1.32 9.93 40.40 48.34 236

SMHS 657 1.4 7.41 7.04 50.74 34.81 213

VHS 661.1 4.4 1.79 5.95 38.10 54.17 245

2012 – 2013 English II


9.83 14.26 47.54 28.37 194.4

ECHS 655.1 3.8 9.29 13.11 48.63 28.96 197

SMHS 654.5 2.7 10.29 15.07 45.59 29.04 194

VHS 655.0 1.5 9.83 13.87 49.71 26.59 193

2012 – 2013 Biology I


4.17 12.35 58.10 25.38 198.7

ECHS 659.2 7.4 3.01 11.45 57.23 28.31 210

SMHS 655.6 4.1 7.56 15.97 58.82 17.65 188

VHS 660.5 7.2 1.04 8.85 57.81 32.29 222

2012 – 2013 U.S. History


13.79 18.77 44.64 22.80 176.5

ECHS 651.3 n/a 13.33 16.0 46.67 24.0 181

SMHS 649.3 n/a 16.4 22.80 40.0 20.80 165

VHS 652.3 n/a 8.33 14.17 52.50 25.0 195

ACT Five Year TrendMS and JCSD

ACT ~ Five Year Trend2013 JCSD 20.8 (.6 net gain over five years)

Accountability Overview 2013The 151 districts in the state are ranked as listed below:

A – 18 (including Corinth – Excellence for All Pilot)

B – 45 (including Gulport) – Excellence for All Pilot)

C – 36D – 37 (including Clarksdale – Excellence for All Pilot)

F – 15

Accountability 2013• The JCSD Overall District

Accountability Label is: B

QDI is 188 (up from 182 last year)

Met Growth (0.183)

Graduation Rate is:4 year: 81.05 year: 78.8

2013 School Level Accountability Labels

• The following is a list of the schools who were assigned an accountability label.

• VHS 217 ( ↑ 213) Met (0.601) A • ECHS 209 (↓ 213) Met (0.581) A• ECUE 196 (↑183) Met (0.195) B• SMUE 190 (↑179) Met (0.129) B• SMHS 192 (↓ 196) Met (0.228) B• SMMS 186 (↑184) Met (0.216) B• VMS 185 (↑180) Met (0.015) B• VUE 185 (↑ 176) Met (0.169) B• ECMS 181 (↑179) Met (0.006) B• SMEE 206 (↑ 202) N/A Not Assigned • SMNE 205 (↑183) N/A Not Assigned

Jackson County School District Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year).

2009 - 70.4 % 2010 - 75.6 %

2011 – 76.42012 – 77.3

2013 Jackson County School District Individual High School Graduation

Rates and HSCIs

Grad Rate HSCIVancleave High 2013: 4 year – 76.7

5 year: 79.1 2013 – 204.92012 – 75.5 2012 – 1852011 - 75.3 2011 - 189.8

St. Martin High 2013: 4 year – 81.5

5 year – 73.0 2013 – 187.12012 – 75.6 2012 - 1942011- 76.9 2011- 194.6

East Central High 2013: 4 year - 83.7

5 year: 87.0 2013 - 237.0

2011 - 76.9 2011 - 190.62012 - 81.5 2012 - 209

HSV – High School ValuePrior to 2013, in order to be assigned a label of A, schools and districts had to meet growth and have a QDI of 200 or above.

This year, however, another number -- high school value (HSV) -- took both QDI and graduation rates into account, and if a district scored a 280 or above with that figure, they could be an A school whether or not their QDI reached the 200 mark.

2013 JCSD Data as Compared to Coastal Area School Districts

District Accountability Label QDI/HSV Growth• Pass Christian A 213/301 Met• Biloxi A 206/292 Met• Ocean Springs A 198/284 Met• Long Beach A 198/282 Met• Hancock B 191/271 Met• JCSD B 188/269 Met• Bay/Waveland B 186/274 Met• Harrison B 185/261 Met• George County B 179/260 Met• Pascagoula B 168/244 Met• Moss Point D 134/198 Not Met• Gulfport N/A Excellence for All Pilot

2013 4 Year Graduation Rate, HSCI and HSV ofArea High Schools

Graduation Rate HSCI HSV

D’Iberville HS 93.4 206.8 286Bay HS 87.7 250 286Pass Christian HS 86.9 218.1 310Ocean Springs HS 86.3 208.2 307Biloxi HS 85.7 239.9 296Long Beach HS 84.3 254 298East Central HS 83.7 237 293St. Martin HS 81.5 187.1 274George County High 80.6 193.5 267Hancock HS 80.2 216 294Gautier HS 79.3 202.4 271Vancleave HS 76.4 204.9 294Pascagoula HS 72.8 209.8 247Gulfport HS 71.2 185.3 269Harrison Central HS 66.7 180.2 248Moss Point HS 63.7 154.5 218

2013 Performance Data for Area High Schools

QDI HSV Growth Perf. Classification

Pass Christian High 223 310 No BOcean Springs High 221 307 Yes AVancleave High 217 294 Yes AHancock High 214 294 Yes ALong Beach High 214 298 No BEast Central High 209 293 Yes A Biloxi High 210 296 Yes AWest Harrison High 206 286 Yes AD’Iberville Senior High 203 286 No BBay High School 198 286 No B St. Martin High 192 274 Yes B Gautier High 192 271 Yes BGeorge County High 186 267 No CHarrison Central 181 248 No CPascagoula High 174 247 Yes BMoss Point High 154 218 Yes C Gulfport High N/A Excellence for All Pilot

2013 Performance Data of Area Middle Schools

QDI Met Growth Perf. Label

• Pass Christian Middle 209 Yes A• Long Beach Middle 207 Yes A• Biloxi Junior High 206 Yes A• Hancock Middle 199 Yes B• Ocean Springs Middle 199 Yes B• D’Iberville Middle 191 No C• Bay Waveland Middle 191 Yes B• George County Middle School 187 Yes B• St. Martin Middle 186 Yes B• Vancleave Middle 185 Yes B• East Central Middle 181 Yes B• Gautier Middle School 176 Yes B• Colmer Middle 171 Yes B• Trent Lott 6th Grade Academy 157 Yes C• Magnolia Jr. High (Moss Point) 133 No D• Gulfport Central Middle N/A• Bayou View Middle N/A

2013 Performance Data for Area Elementary Schools

QDI Met Growth Perf. Label Delisle Elementary 227 Yes ANorth Bay Elem. (Biloxi) 223 Yes APass Christian Elem. 213 Yes ABeach Elem. 209 Yes ASt. Martin East 206* St. Martin North 205*East Central Upper 196 Yes BSaucier Elementary 193 No COS Upper Elementary 191 Yes BSt. Martin Upper 190 Yes BGorenflo Elem 187 Yes BWoolmarket Elementary 186 Yes BVancleave Upper 185 Yes BGautier Elementary 166 No CCentral Elem (Pascagoula) 166 Yes BLake Elem. 160 Yes CMoss Point Upper 131 Yes DMoss Point Lower 135 Yes CBayou View Elem. N/AAnniston Elementary N/A

Top 34 Highest Ranking Districts in MS (Ranked by QDI/HSV)

• Pass Christian 214/301 – A New Albany 195/277 - B• Clinton 208/295 – A Tishomingo Co. 193/278 - B• Enterprise 206/297 – A Pearl River County 192/270 - B• Biloxi 206/292 – A Webster County 191/281 – A• Oxford 202/288 – A Newton County 191/273 - B• Kosciusko202/284 – A Hancock County 191/271 - B• Amory 202/276 - A Monroe County 190/274 - B• Booneville 201/291 – A Senatobia 189/271 - B• Petal 201/284 – A Jackson County 188/269 – B• ($7995.00 per student/ ranked 131 of 152 in terms of Per Pupil Expenditure)

• Pontotoc City 199/287 – A Tupelo 188/262 - B• Madison Co. 199/285 – A Bay St. Louis 186/274 - B• DeSoto County 199/284 – A Pearl 186/266 - B• Ocean Springs 198/284 – A Grenada 186/258 - B• Long Beach 198/282 – A Lowndes County 185/265 - B• Lamar County 197/283 – A Harrison County 185/262 - B• Rankin County 196/282 – A Union County 184/272 - B• Union City 195/283 – A Pontotoc County 184/270 - B

Note: In 2013, there are only 13 districts that met the following criteria:

* District label as either A or B* Schools in these districts are either all A’s or a combination of A and B schools. (A district had to have at least one A school to be included in this group.)* All schools met growth.

Jackson County is one of the thirteen that

met the criteria to be included in this group. A list of these district is included on the next slide.

BiloxiBooneville

ClintonJCSD

Lamar CountyLincoln CountyMonroe County

New AlbanyNewton CountyOcean Springs

OxfordPearl

Tishomingo County

Changes in NCLB Requirements (effective 2012)

• The model changed in August 2012 due to the ESEA Flexibility Request.

• School Districts no longer receive a label.• AYP is no longer measured. • New Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs).• Schools should cut in half the difference between current

(2011) proficiency rates and 100 % proficiency in six years (2017) overall and for each subgroup in E/LA and Math.

Mississippi Federal Differentiated Accountability Model

• Priority (Lowest Performing 5% of Title I Schools)• Focus (10 % of Title I schools with the biggest

achievement gaps and/or lowest subgroup achievement.

• Approaching Target (Schools that miss AMO targets for a category for two years.)

• On Target• Reward (High Performers and Big Improvers)

JCSD School Labels ~ 2013

• ECLE – Approaching Target (based on ECUE)

• ECUE – Approaching Target• SMNE – Approaching Target• SMEE – Approaching Target• SMUE – Approaching Target• VLE – Approaching Target (based on VUE)

• VUE – Approaching Target

The JCSD Overall District Accountability Label is: B

QDI is 188HSV is 269Met Growth

Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year), 78.8 (5 year)

In Summary:

jackson county school district “raising the standard ”

Documents

english iiscoregrminbasic

standardaccountability