jacci siebert spd keynote sens.ations 2012leicester

Upload: branislava-jaranovic-vujic

Post on 14-Jan-2016

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Jacci Siebert SPD Keynote Sens.ations 2012Leicester

TRANSCRIPT

  • SPD

    Sensory Processing Disorder:

    Facts, Assumptions and Myths

    Jacci Siebert

    BSc (OT) Hons

    Specialist Childrens OT

    Advanced SI Practitioner & SI mentor

    Sens.ations, Leicester, 7th March 2012

  • OT - art and science of helping people do the day-to-day activities that are important to them despite impairment, disability, or handicap.

    Occupation in occupational therapy refers to all the activities that occupy peoples time and give meaning to their lives. (Neistadt & Blesedell Crepeau, 1998).

    Occupational deprivation - opportunity to engage in occupations.

    Occupational justice principles all people helped to live a life filled with meaningful and health-promoting occupation.

    SPD is a barrier to engagement in

    OCCUPATION

  • SPD facts SPD is a complex disorder of the brain that affects developing children

    and adults.

    Parent surveys, clinical assessments, and laboratory protocols exist to identify children with SPD.

    At least 1 in 20 people in the general population may be affected by SPD. In children who are gifted and those with ADHD, Autism, and fragile X

    syndrome, the prevalence of SPD is much higher than in the general population.

    Studies have found a significant difference between the physiology of children with SPD and children who are typically developing.

    Studies have found a significant difference between the physiology of children with SPD and children with ADHD.

    SPD has unique sensory symptoms that are not explained by other known disorders.

    Heredity may be one cause of the disorder. Laboratory studies suggest that the sympathetic and parasympathetic

    nervous systems are not functioning typically in children with SPD.

    Preliminary research data support decades of anecdotal evidence that OT is an effective intervention for treating the symptoms of SPD.

    from Sensational Kids: Hope and Help for Children With Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD ) p. 249-250 by Lucy Jane Miller, PhD, OTR

  • What is SPD?

    Previously referred to as DSI or Sensory Integration Dysfunction.

    First described and studied in the 1960s by A. Jean Ayres, an occupational therapist,

    educational psychologist and neuroscience

    researcher.

    Causes: hereditary? prematurity?

    A.Jean Ayres

    1920-1988

  • The term Sensory Integration can refer to:

    Ayres theory of normal development

    A process of evaluating Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) so we can better understand

    the behaviour we see in individuals.

    A specific approach to intervention Ayres Sensory Integration

  • 7 SENSES

    Far senses

    o Sight (Visual) o Sound (Auditory) o Smell (Olfactory)

    Near Senses

    Taste (Gustatory)

    Touch (Tactile)

    Vestibular (movement and balance sense)-provides

    information about where the head and body are in space and in relation to the earth's surface.

    Proprioception (joint/muscle sense)-provides information about

    where body parts are and what they are doing .

  • Tactile +

    Proprioception

    =

    Somatosensory

    perception

    (body awareness)

    Vestibular +

    Proprioception

    =

    Movement sense

    and postural

    control

  • Autonomic Nervous System

  • Typical Brain

    Sound, Sight, Taste

    Touch, Smell,

    Body Position sense,

    Movement Sense

    Response

    (timed and adapted

    to the environment)

    The brain makes sense of the sensory input we gain from the

    environment and designs & implements an appropriate response.

  • Five interrelated components that help to

    explain how Sensory Integration occurs:

    Sensory Registration

    Orientation

    Interpretation

    Organization of a response

    Execution of a response

  • What are the results of

    Sensory Integration?

    Self Regulation

    The nervous systems ability to attain, maintain, and change levels of arousal or alertness.

    Motor Planning

    The process of deciding what your body has to do

    and then doing it (praxis).

  • SPD Brain

    Sensory Info

    Sensory seeker

    Sensory disregarder

    Sensory avoider

    Sensory sensitivity

    Problems interpreting, modulating and discriminating sensory

    inputs:

    Sensory defensiveness Poor sensory awareness

    May or may not contribute to sensory distortions

    (receptor/brainstem/cortical problem):

    Auditory distortions (hyperacuisis, tinnitus, misophonia) Vertigo Visual distortions (prosopagnosia, hallucinations) Synaesthesia

  • Identifying Sensory Processing

    Disorder

    5-15 percent of general population (Miller, 2006)

    Sensory processing impacts on occupation

    SI trained therapist (typically OT) assesses clients:

    Sensory Discrimination

    Sensory Modulation

    Posture, co-ordination, balance, motor skills

    Praxis

    Visual spatial organisation

  • What does SPD look like?

    Symptoms and Red Flags individuals experience sensations differently more or less intensely, dont get sensory messages right. Sensory problems are chronic and disrupt everyday life (Miller, 2006).

    Confusion about symptoms commonly result in other diagnoses being given (Oppositional Defiant

    Disorder, Failure to Thrive, Infantile Annorexia)

    (Miller, 2006)

    Co-morbidity of SPD ADHD, ASD

    The road to an SPD diagnosis begins with a physician in order to rule out other neurological

    conditions.

  • What is the impact of SPD on

    function?

    Emotional regulation

    Social participation

    Play

    Learning

    Coping skills

  • Sensory Processing Problems

    Sensory Registration Deficits Registration deficits limit the amount of sensation that the individual

    detects, thereby limiting relevant information from their perception.

    Registration is the initial point of perception from the sensory organs.

    Sensory Modulation Modulation deficits affect the way the individual perceives the

    intensity of the stimuli, thereby altering the ability to cope with,

    tolerate, or orient to the information, especially in the presence of

    stress, unexpected sensations, or in high stimulus environments.

    Sensory Discrimination Discrimination deficits lead to inadequate or distorted perceptions

    due to slow or inaccurate information processing about the details of

    the sensory input such as shape, size, location, quantity and quality.

  • Miller et al (2007) proposed Nosology for SPD

    Sensory Processing

    Disorder (SPD)

    Sensory Modulation

    Disorder (SMD)

    -SOR -SUR -SS

    Sensory-Based Motor Disorder (SBMD)

    -Dyspraxia -Postural Disorder

    Sensory Discrimination Disorder (SDD)

    -Visual

    -Auditory

    -Tactile

    -Vestibular

    -Proprioception

    -Taste/smell SOR = sensory overresponsivity SUR = sensory underresponsivity SS = sensory seeking

  • Diagram from Pre-school Sensory Scan for Educators by Carol Stock Kranowitz

    Sensory Integration Disorder

    Sensory Modulation Disorder

    Sensory Over-

    responsivity (Sensory Avoider)

    Sensory Under-

    responsivity (Sensory

    Disregarder)

    Sensory Seeking

    (Sensory Craver)

    Sensory Discrimination

    Disorder (Sensory Jumbler)

    Sensory based Motor

    Disorder

    Postural Disorder (Sensory Slumper)

    Dyspraxia (Sensory Fumbler)

  • Sensory Profile by Winnie Dunn PhD, OTR , FAOTA

    This is a standardised

    caregiver

    questionnaire

    which seeks

    to identify the

    nature of the

    childs sensory

    processing

    difficulties. Mainly looks

    at sensory

    modulation

    Neurological

    Threshold

    Continuum

    Behavioural Response Continuum

    Acting in ACCORDANCE

    with Threshold

    Acting to COUNTERACT

    Threshold

    HIGH

    (habituation)

    Poor Registration Uninterested, Apathetic

    Dull affect

    Withdrawn

    Overly tired

    Self-absorbed

    Sensory Seeking Active

    Continuously engaging

    Fidgety

    Excitable

    LOW

    (sensitization)

    Distractible

    Hyperactive

    Sensitivity to Stimuli

    Resistant to change

    Reliant on rigid rituals

    Sensation Avoiding

  • Neurological

    Threshold

    Continuum

    Behavioural Response Continuum

    Acting in ACCORDANCE

    with Threshold

    Acting to COUNTERACT

    Threshold

    HIGH

    (habituation) Bystander Easy-going and not easily ruffled,

    have to be called several times to

    get their attention, miss signposts,

    may leave dirt on their face or

    hands, find scratches and bruises

    and dont know how they got them, dont notice clutter until someone points it out.

    Seeker Enjoy going to firework displays,

    make noises such as humming and

    whistling, order or cook spicy food,

    tend to touch people when talking to

    them, walk around barefoot, change

    daily routines to keep them

    interesting.

    LOW

    (sensitization)

    Distracted by sounds, startle easily,

    are bothered by fast changing

    images on TV, have precise ideas

    about clothing textures, repeatedly

    pick the same food in restaurants,

    prefer clean design in the home,

    select only a few chosen rides at

    amusement parks.

    Sensor

    Leave the room when a crowd starts

    to gather, like their surroundings

    clean and tidy, keep curtains or

    blinds drawn or partially drawn,

    make narrow food choices, dont like getting their hands mucky, select

    solitary leisure activities

    Avoider Cited from Living Sensationally by Winnie Dunn

  • The Aim of OT with children with

    SPD

    Reframe the observable behaviour using sensory glasses child is often then seen in a more positive light.

    Provide a toolbox of sensory related strategies for home and school.

    Teach reasoning strategies to parents, carers or teachers so that tasks, environments, relationships

    can be modified for better functioning.

    Direct therapy programme designed to improve quality of childs life in 3 occupations central to childhood: school, play, self care.

  • Treatment methods

    Occupational therapy (and physiotherapy) using various approaches : sensory-motor, psychosocial, neuro-developmental, cognitive and motor learning approaches.

    Occupational therapy using sensory stimulation and Sensory Diets: Henry OT toolbox

    Alert programme

    Therapressure (Willbargers) Therapeutic Listening Programme

    Weighted or pressure vests

    Therapy balls as seat alternative

    Occupational therapy using a Sensory Integration Approach (OT:SI): Ayres Sensory Integration intervention or ASI

  • Sensory Integration

    Treatment Principles

    Creation of a therapeutic environment

    Address underlying deficits in neural and sensory processing

    See movement, think sensory

    Provide planned and controlled sensory inputs designed to childs specific needs

    Elicit an adaptive response to environmental demand

    Grade activities from simple to complex

    Use a child centred approach

    Use non-directive purposeful activities

    Balance of facilitation and inhibition

    Encourage active participation

    Capitalise on the childs inner drive and self direction.

    To learn how to learn

    Therapy must be fun

  • Ayres SI Fidelity Tool (Parham et al, 2007)

    Structural elements

    Professional background

    Clinical experience

    Room set up

    Type of equipment

    Process elements

    Provide sensory opportunities

    Provide just-right challenge

    Collaborate on activity choice

    Guide self organisation

    Support optimal arousal

    Create play context

    Maximise childs success

    Ensure physical safety

    Arrange room to engage child

    Foster therapeutic alliance

  • Recent OT-SI Effectiveness

    Studies Author Design Subjects Age range

    (years)

    Intervention Outcome

    Smith

    2005

    ABAB

    OT-SI vs

    tabletop

    activities

    7 PDD or

    Mental retardation

    8-19 5 sessions

    per week of

    30 minutes

    Significant reduction in

    self stimulatory

    behaviour

    Miller

    2007

    OT-SI vs

    activity

    protocol

    vs no

    treatment

    24 SMD

    (15 ADHD,

    1 Anxiety)

    3-11 20 x 1 hour

    sessions

    over 10

    weeks

    Significant gains in

    individualised GAS,

    Attention,

    Cognitive/social and

    reduced electrodermal

    responsivity ampitude

    Pfeiffer

    2011

    OT-SI vs

    fine-motor

    37 ASD 6-12 18 x 45 min

    sessions

    over 6

    weeks

    Significant positive

    changes in GAS

    (sensory processing,

    motor skills and social

    functioning)

  • Efficacy of ASI Intervention (May Benson and Koomar 2010, Pfeiffer et al 2011)

    Evidence suggests that SI may result in positive

    outcome in the areas of:

    Sensorimotor skills

    Motor planning

    Socialization

    Attention

    Behavioral regulation

    Reading and reading related skills

    Individualized goals

    Autistic behaviors

  • Therapy

    Space

    Russet House School, Enfield (2005)

    Mary Sheridan Centre, Lambeth (2004)

  • Early diagnosis prevents long term

    issues developing

    Plasticity remains throughout the lifespan, so its never too late, but a more optimal outcome is gained with early diagnosis and intervention.

    Who benefits from screening for SPD? - Fussy babies with feeding and sleeping issues

    - Infants with atypical developmental milestones

    - All 0-5 year olds with suspected ASD and ADHD.

    - Majority of children with ASD

    - Majority of children with ADHD

    - Children & adults with motor learning and coordination difficulties, balance and muscle fatigue issues, fine motor and handwriting difficulties.

  • What happens when intervention is

    not available?

    SMD - secondary mental health complications, depression, borderline personality

    disorder, bipolar mood disorder,

    obsessive compulsive disorder.

    - possible drug and alcohol addiction.

    - antisocial behaviour.

    - relationships in family are stressed.

    SBMD - poor self esteem, poor achievement despite clear strengths, social rejection.

  • Reasoning Strategies

    A SECRET (Miller, 2006)

    A Attention S Sensation E Emotion C Culture R Relationship E Environment T Task

    Cited from Sensational Kids: Hope and Help for Children with Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) by Lucy Jane Miller, Ph.D., OTR

  • Support available

    Books The Out-of-Sync child by Carol Stock Kranowitz

    Sensational Kids by Lucy Jane Miller

    Baby Sense by Megan Faure & Ann Richardson

    Websites www.sensoryintegration.org.uk

    www.spdfoundation.net

    www.thespiralfoundation.org

    Local services: screening & referral to OT via, GP, HV, SENCo, Paediatrician, Midwife.

    Independent Occupational Therapists www.cotss-ip.org.uk

  • Thank you for Listening

    Contact details: [email protected]

  • References

    Arbesman, M. & Lieberman, D. (2010) Methodology for the systematic reviews of occupational therapy for children and adolescents with difficulty processing and

    integration sensory information. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (3), 368-

    374.

    Bagatell, N., Mirigliani, G., Patterson, C., Reyes, Y. & Test, L. (2010) Effectiveness of therapy ball chairs with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational

    Therapy, 64 (6), 895-903.

    Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L. Fluss, R. Cermak, S.A. Engel-Yeger, B. & Gal, E. (2009) A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autistic spectrum

    disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 1-11

    Ben-Sasson, A., Cermak, S.A., Orsmond, G.I. & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007) Extreme sensory modulation behaviours in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. American

    Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (5), 584-592.

    Brown, N.B. & Dunn, W. (2010) Relationship between context and sensory processing in children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (3) 474-483.

    Bundy, A.C., Shia, S., Qi, L. & Miller, L.J. (2007) How does sensory processing dysfunction affect play? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 201-208.

    Bundy, A.C., Murray, E. and Lane, S. (2002) Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: FA Davies Co.

    Case-Smith, J. & Bryan, T. (1999) The effects of occupational therapy with sensory integration emphasis on preschool-age children with autism. American Journal of

    Occupational Therapy, 53(5), 489-497.

  • Gere, D.R., Capps, S.C., Mitchell, D.W. & Grubbs, E. (2009) Sensory sensitivities of gifted children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(3), 288-295.

    Lane, S.J. & Schaaf, R.C. (2010) Examining the neuroscience evidence for sensory-driven neuroplasticity: Implications for sensory-based occupational therapy for children

    and adolescents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (3), 375-390.

    Lawlor, M.C. (2003) The significance of being occupied: The social construction of childhood occupations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(4), 424-434

    Mailloux, Z., Mulligan, S., Smith Roley, S., Blanche, E., Cermak, S., Coleman, G.G., Bodison, S. & Lane, C.J. (2011) Verification and clarification of patterns of sensory

    integrative dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65 (2), 143-151.

    May-Benson, T.A. & Koomar, J.A. (2010) Systematic review of the research evidence examining the effectiveness of interventions using a sensory integrative approach for

    children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (3), 403-414.

    May-Benson, T.A., Koomar, J.A. & Teasdale, A. (2009) Incidence of pre, peri-, and post-natal birth and developmental problems of children with sensory processing disorder and

    children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 3 (31), 1-

    12.

    Miller, L.J., Coll, J.R. & Schoen, S.A. (2007) A randomized controlled pilot study of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with sensory modulation disorder.

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 228-238.

    Miller, L.J., Anzalone, M.E., Lane, S.J., Cermak, S.A. & Osten, E.J. (2007) Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of

    Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 135-140.

  • Parham, L.D., Smith Roley, S., May-Benson, T.A., Koomar, J., Brett-Green, B., Burke, J.P., Cohn, E.S., Mailloux, Z., Miller, L.J. & Schaaf, R.C. (2011) Development of a fidelity

    measure for research on the effectiveness of the Ayres sensory integration

    intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65 (2), 133-142.

    Pfeiffer, B.A., Koenig, K., Kinnealey, M., Sheppard, M. & Henderson, L. (2011) Effectiveness of sensory integration interventions in children with autism spectrum

    disorders: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65 (1), 76-85.

    Schaaf, R.C., & Nightlinger, K.M. (2007) Occupational therapy using a sensory integrative approach: A case study of effectiveness. American Journal of Occupational

    Therapy, 61 (2), 239-246.

    Schaaf, R.C. & Smith Roley, S.(2006) Sensory Integration: Applying clinical reasoning to practice with diverse populations. Austin, Texas. Pro-ed, Inc.

    Schilling, D.L., Washington, K., Billingsley, F.F. & Deitz, J. (2003) Classroom seating for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Therapy balls versus chairs.

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (5), 534-541.

    Smith, S.A., Press, B., Koenig, K.P. & Kinnealey, M. (2005) Effects of sensory integration intervention of self-stimulating and self-injurious behaviour. American Journal of

    Occupational Therapy, 59 (4), 418-25.

    Stephenson, E.A. & Chesson, R.A. (2008) 'Always the guiding hand: parents' accounts of the long-term implications of developmental coordination disorder for their children &

    families. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34 (3), 335-343.

  • SPD red flags for:

    Infants and toddlers ____ Problems eating or sleeping

    ____ Refuses to go to anyone but me

    ____ Irritable when being dressed; uncomfortable in clothes

    ____ Rarely plays with toys

    ____ Resists cuddling, arches away when held

    ____ Cannot calm self

    ____ Floppy or stiff body, motor delays

    from www.spdfoundation.net

  • SPD red flags for:

    Pre-schoolers ____ Over-sensitive to touch, noises, smells, other people

    ____ Difficulty making friends

    ____ Difficulty dressing, eating, sleeping, and/or toilet training

    ____ Clumsy; poor motor skills; weak

    ____ In constant motion; in everyone else's face and space

    ____ Frequent or long temper tantrums

    from www.spdfoundation.net

  • SPD red flags for:

    Grade schoolers ___ Over-sensitive to touch, noise, smells, other people

    ___ Easily distracted, fidgety, craves movement; aggressive

    ___ Easily overwhelmed

    ___ Difficulty with handwriting or motor activities

    ___ Difficulty making friends

    ___ Unaware of pain and/or other people

    from www.spdfoundation.net

  • SPD red flags for:

    Adolescents and adults ___ Over-sensitive to touch, noise, smells, and other people

    ___ Poor self-esteem; afraid of failing at new tasks

    ___ Lethargic and slow

    ___ Always on the go; impulsive; distractible

    ___ Leaves tasks uncompleted

    ___ Clumsy, slow, poor motor skills or handwriting

    ___ Difficulty staying focused

    ___ Difficulty staying focused at work and in meetings

    from www.spdfoundation.net