To the Lord Mayor and Report No. 137/2013 Members of Dublin City Council Report of the Dublin City Manager

(a) Planning and Development Act 2000 & Planning and Development

Regulations 2001 (Part 8)

(b) Local Government Act 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ In compliance with the provisions of Section 179 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 and Part 8 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 and in compliance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 2001, I hereby notify you that it is proposed to carry out the following development: Pursuant to the requirements of the above, notice is hereby given of Dublin City Council's intention to carry out the following works: Proposed Sutton to Sandycove Cycleway & Footway Interim Works: Bull Wall (Wooden Bridge) to Causeway Road, Dollymount, and Dublin 3 (A) The Site The site of the subject scheme is located between the Wooden Bridge at Bull Island and at Causeway Road junction on the seaward side of Clontarf Road/James Larkin Road. A lagoon is formed between the Wooden bridge/Bull Wall, Causeway road and Bull Island. A dilapidated tram shelter is located opposite Dolyes Lane indicating the former presence of the Howth Tramline and to the north of the later structure a pumping station. The site is located in proximity to the Dublin Bay area, with is designated with Special Protection Area (SPA) status, Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Proposed Natural Heritage Area (pNHA) status. Bull Island has been assigned additional designations including Nature Reserve, Ramsar Site (under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance), Wildfowl Sanctuary, UNESCO Biosphere Reserve and a Special Amenity Area Order (SAAO). The National Parks & Wildlife Service (NPWS) of the DoECLG have been consulted in relation to the preparation of the proposal and Habitats screening.

(B) The Proposal Proposed Sutton to Sandycove Cycleway & Footway Interim Works: Bull Wall (Wooden Bridge) to Causeway Road, Dollymount, Dublin 3.

The proposal for the Sutton to Sandycove Cycleway & Footway Interim Works: Bull Wall (Wooden Bridge) to Causeway Road is to provide approximately 2km of cycleway between the Bull Wall and Causeway Road tying in with the existing cycleway on either side, thereby providing a continuous 8km cycleway around North Dublin Bay. Works Include:

Construction of 2km of cycle track and footway requiring a reduction in the road carriageway cross section and resurfacing of the road;

Introduction of a number of signal controlled crossings to facilitate access for pedestrians and cyclists on the route from the surroundings area;

Seawall repairs including the construction of a new 325 metres section of sea wall;

Flood defence works to provide a continuous flood defence level of 4.25m OD between the Bull Wall and Causeway Road;

Construction of approximately 2km of the North City Arterial Watermain between the Bull Wall and causeway Road while the road works are being undertaken;

Other works include renovation of tram shelter, undergrounding of pumping station, closure of 2 slipways and steps accessing lagoon and loss of 7 parking spaces and associated works.

(C) Submissions A total of 43 submissions have been received in relation to the project including observation from the Clontarf Residents Association, An Taisce, Dublin Cycling Campaign, a number of public representatives, commuters and other residents. The contents of the observer submissions can be summarised as follows:

Lack of Landscaping

Reduced Road Width

Car Parking Issues

Flood Defence Works

Closure of slipways and access to beach

Impact on the Boardwalk Promenade proposal

Traffic management measures along Dollymount Avenue

Relocation of Bus Stop adjacent to former Dollymount House

Construction of the watermain

Lack of public consultation

Visual impact of the scheme

Amenity value of the scheme

Huge improvement in terms of pedestrian and cyclist safety

Huge benefit to Clontarf and wider city

(D) Evaluation There is a strong policy context for the scheme at both the national and local level. National Guidance 2009 - 2020 Smarter Travel - A Sustainable Transport Future. DOT The National Cycle Policy Framework 2009 – 2020 DoECLG

2.10 Sutton to Sandycove Scheme We will complete the Sutton to Sandycove (S2S) cycleway / promenade. This 22km continuous facility will act as a commuting route as well as a world class recreational and tourist route. It will be a flagship project for the capital.

The Planning System & Flood Risk Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities November 2009 DoEHLG/OPW

Regional Planning 6.3.6 Cycling and Walking 2011-2017 Development Plan 3.3.1 CORE STRATEGY STRAND 1 3.3.1.2 Connecting and Sustaining the City’s Infrastructure

Movement and Transport

Services Infrastructure 3.3.1.3 Greening the City – Landscape, Biodiversity, Open Space & Recreation 4.3 The Strategic Approach (Shaping The City)

The creation of a more compact city, where residents can live and work in close proximity, thereby reducing urban sprawl and unsustainable travel patterns

4.4.2 Inner Suburbs and Outer City as Part of the Metropolitan Area

4. A strategic green network, comprising river/canal corridors and open /institutional lands which can contribute to the built and natural landscape of the city.

4.4.5 The Public Realm SI2 To continue to promote the modal shift from private car use towards increased use of

more sustainable forms of transport such as cycling, walking and public transport and to implement the initiatives contained in the government’s, ‘Smarter Travel, A Sustainable Transport Future2009-2020’

SI9 To achieve a strategic, coherent and high quality cycle network across the city that is

integrated with public transport and interconnected with cultural, recreational, retail, educational and employment destinations and attractions

SI10 To enhance, extend and provide cycling infrastructure in accordance with the National Cycle Policy Framework 2009– 2020 and the government’s, ‘Smarter Travel, a Sustainable Transport Future 2009 – 2020’

SIO11 To prepare and implement a Dublin Cycling Strategy which sets out the City

Council’s cycling policies, targets and programmes, together with an annual report on progress towards objectives which will include:

A cycle training programme

A ‘Safe Routes to Schools’ programme

A cycle signage strategy

A cycling awareness strategy

A new cycle parking strategy to provide guidance on the nature, quantum and location of cycling parking facilities in the city to address cycle parking needs at public transport stops and interchange, and other key destinations and attractions

SIO13 To develop new cycle links including:

Sutton to Sandycove, including new off-road cycle and pedestrian route through Docklands and on to Clontarf

SIO14 To develop a direct cycle linkage system away from the primary traffic

network including on and off-road cycle lanes designed and constructed to minimise conflict with other road users.

SIO23 To create and support a network of pedestrian infrastructure to promote and

facilitate walking, provide improved levels of priority and lighting for pedestrians and cyclists along key desire lines and accommodate growth in public transport commuter numbers

SI43 To ensure the upgrading of wastewater infrastructure and to facilitate the

provision and safeguarding of infrastructure corridors required to facilitate sustainable development in the city and region (see also sections8.4.6 and 8.4.9 and Appendix 2 –Water Services Plan)

SI49 To have regard to the Guidelines for Planning Authorities on Flood Risk

Management, November 2009, published by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when assessing planning applications and in the preparation of plans both statutory and non-statutory

SI50 To put in place adequate measures to protect the integrity of the existing

Flood Defence Infrastructure identified in Appendix 17 and to ensure that the new developments do not have the effect of reducing the effectiveness or integrity of existing and new flood defence infrastructure and that flood defence infrastructure provision has regard also to nature conservation and amenity issues.

5.2.4.7 Flood Management

It is recognised that the risk of flooding has increased due to climate change and sea level rise.

Coastal Flooding arising from the sea or estuary

The Dublin City Council Water Services Strategic Plan 2009 is the current strategic plan in place for Dublin City…

Coastal Flooding – the 2005 Report on the Dublin Coastal Flood Protection Project

SI50 To put in place adequate measures to protect the integrity of the existing Flood Defence Infrastructure identified in Appendix 17 and to ensure that the new developments do not have the effect of reducing the effectiveness or integrity of existing and new flood defence infrastructure and that flood defence infrastructure provision has regard also to nature conservation and amenity issues.

GC1 To progress a strategic network as illustrated in the Strategic Green Network

map (see Figure 10 CDP) GC2 To improve pedestrian and cycle access routes to strategic level amenities GC8 To develop a network of green corridors through the city, thereby

interconnecting key open spaces, and extending out to the wider Dublin region

GCO1 To progress the illustrated strategic green infrastructure network and to

devise a programme of specific works to be implemented within the current development plan timeframe (see Strategic Green Network Map and also City Centre Routes Map, Figures 10 and 11)

GCO2 To achieve the following critical linkages within the lifetime of the

development plan; (i) To promote the development of the Sutton to Sandycove Cycletrack scheme (S2S) as a key objective in both ‘SmarterTravel’ and in the ‘National Cycle Policy Framework ‘subject to the appropriate environmental assessments, including any assessment required under 6(3) of the Habitats Directive. Subject to compliance with environmental regulations and statutory approvals, completion of this project is recognised as a significant development of Dublin Bay with potential recreational and tourism benefits, as well as providing a tram-free cycleway for both recreation and commuter cyclists

(iv) To improve access to existing natural assets such as parks and waterways through identified green routes.

GCO5 To develop linear parks along waterways and to link existing parks and open

space in order to provide green corridors throughout the city. GC23 To cooperate with Dublin Bay Task Force (DBTF) to work towards developing

a framework for Coastal Zone Management Plan for Dublin Bay, developing a detailed masterplan, and identifying new opportunities for enhancing Dublin Bay as a Resource

GC26 To protect flora, fauna and habitats, which have been identified by the

Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Wildlife Act 1976 (as amended), the flora protection order (S.I. No. 84 of 1999) and the European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulation 1997 (S.I No. 94 of 1997),

GC31 That any plan or project with the potential to give rise to significant direct,

indirect or secondary impacts on a Natura 2000 site(s) shall be subject to an appropriate assessment in accordance with Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive

GC39 To have regard to the objectives of the ‘Dublin City Sport and Active

Recreation Strategy 2009-16’in the planning and provision of indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including water-based activities

8.4.7 Developing a Strategic Green Network 16.1.1 Design of public spaces 16.1.2 Connections 16.1.3 Making Successful Streets 16.1.6 Movement and Vehicles 16.2.7 Green Networks 16.2.8 Development Proposals Adjoining Rivers and Canals 16.2.9 Flood Risk Areas 16.2.10 Open Space Lands / Community and Institutional Resource Lands / Large Tracts of

Lands /Lands with Open Character 16.2.9 Flood Risk Areas (see also section 5.2.4.7 and Appendix 17)

For coastal areas, soft engineering options are to be applied where appropriate in accordance with best practice.

17.8 Roads and Services Appendix 2 National, Regional & Local Guidance

Water Services Plan 2009 Appendix 7 – Strategic Cycle Network

4. Recreational routes: These routes will be progressed where development opportunities arise, generally in association with walking routes (see also relevant policies in Chapter 5, Connecting and Sustaining the City’s Infrastructure and Chapter 6, Greening the City and also Figure 6, 10 and 11)

■ Section of proposed S2S (Sutton to Sandycove) cycleway/promenade that would proceed through Dublin City Council area, subject to feasibility study.

Dublin City Council supports the development of a Sutton to Sandycove (S2S) promenade and cycleway, in so far as it is practicable, subject to final approval of detailed design and agreement at each stage by the elected representatives of the City Council. Dublin City Council will also explore the development of a cycle route from Sandymount, in the vicinity of Irishtown Nature Reserve to the South Bull Wall, in consultation with Dublin

Principle Issues arising from Consultation and Response

1. Landscaping There is some concern regarding the lack of any landscaping proposals submitted as part of the application. Response: As the proposal is an interim scheme which aims to develop a cycleway largely within the existing road carriageway cross section there is very little room to provide landscaping measures. During the Detailed Design of the Scheme a landscape design will be developed in consultation with the Dublin City Council Parks and Landscape Services Division

2. Reduced road width

A number of submissions express concern regarding the impact of reducing the carriageway width of the Clontarf Road. One submission refers to the National Roads Authority’s Guidelines on Traffic Calming.

Response: The NRA Guidelines on Traffic Calming were produced for the road safety management of high-speed national roads in rural areas as they enter towns and villages. These guidelines do not apply to urban roads such as the current proposal at Dollymount. However, the guidelines are based on the general principle that narrower roads have a traffic calming effect and lead to lower speeds.

The design guidance that is relevant to the current proposal is the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Volume 6 Section 1 Part 2 (NRA TD 27/11) which states that urban all-purpose single carriageway roads should have a carriageway width of between 6.00m to 7.00m. The current proposal is consistent with these guidelines.

The Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (published by the Department of Transport March 2013) states that: "Lane widths may be reduced to 3m on those Arterial and Link streets where lower design speeds are being applied, such as in centres and where access for larger vehicles is only occasionally required".

Lower traffic speeds due to a reduced carriageway width will not cause traffic delays. In fact traffic capacity may increase with lower speed as headways between vehicles can be shorter. This principle is reflected internationally in design manuals such as the US Highway Capacity Manual, which is based on extensive research and traffic flow theory.

The proposed carriageway width of 6.0m provided within the scheme is intended to slow vehicles to a safe speed while maintaining free flow conditions. The average heavy goods vehicle is approximately 2.5m wide. A carriageway width of 6m is sufficient to allow two heavy goods vehicles to pass in opposite directions. The numbers of such vehicles on the coast road at Dollymount is relatively low as it is a residential area.

Traffic lane widths over the length of the scheme will generally be reduced to a width of three metres in each direction. This will have a number of benefits to both users of the cycleway and also to local residents. The narrower traffic lanes and the introduction of traffic islands and build outs will have a significant beneficial effect of calming traffic speeds. The existing speed limit of 50km/h will be extended beyond the Causeway Road/Watermill Road Junction. This section currently has a speed limit of 60km/h. As this scheme only extends from the Wooden Bridge to just beyond the Causeway Road/Watermill Road Junction, this proposal has no brief to consider traffic speeds beyond these limits. DCC has noted the comments. New traffic speed signs will be placed to the north of the Causeway Road/Watermill Road Junction to notify drivers of the extended speed limit.

3. Car Parking Issues There have been a number of concerns regarding the impact of the scheme on car parking including the loss of car parking and also the introduction of additional car parking along the route.

Response: As the proposal is an interim scheme which aims to develop a cycleway largely within the existing road carriageway cross section. Therefore, it is not possible to retain all parking spaces. The loss of car parking has been minimised as much as possible along the Clontarf Road and James Larkin Road. Following the receipt of submissions the project design team has further reviewed the preliminary design and the number of spaces affected by the Interim Scheme as proposed in the Part VIII application cannot be further reduced.

There is also a submission on file in relation to the installation of parking in Clontarf Road from Dollymount Park as far as Dollymount Avenue. It is argued that there is no requirement for parking between the shops and No 378. It is considered that the parked cars provide a hazard by providing a visual obstruction to drivers exiting onto Clontarf Rd. The narrowing of the carriageway will exacerbate problems. Following the receipt of submissions on the topic, the preliminary design has been reviewed and the double yellow lines outside the houses between the shops at the junction of Dollymount Park and house number 378 can be retained as per the request of the residents without any effect on the scheme.

It was noted in a number of submissions that the accesses to a number of the houses along Clontarf Road are quite narrow and that residents are required to reverse into the access. Swept path analyses using an estate car with a length of 4.7 metres and a width of 1.8 metres have been undertaken on a sample number of the properties between Seafield Road East and Mount Prospect Avenue. These tests show that with the proposed scheme in place it will be possible to safely access all properties.

4. Flood Defence Works A number of submissions on file relate to the raising of the sea wall. Some of the submissions argue that the wall is too high while other submissions note that the proposal does not give enough flood protection. Response: As these are Interim Works which are designed as the first stage towards the delivery of the overall Dollymount Promenade & Flood Protection Project (DPFPP) the full flood defence height of +4.6m OD as proposed in the DPFPP is not being provided as the wave reduction barrier element of the scheme will be constructed at a later stage of the delivery of the project. To ensure consistency with the design of the DPFPP and to ensure minimal redundant work when the DPFPP is constructed, flood defence will be provided to a height of +4.25m OD. Once the promenade and wave reduction barrier is constructed a flood defence level of +4.6m OD will be achieved. In the section where the highest number of properties are located, i.e. between the Wooden Bridge and Mount Prospect Avenue, the increase in height of the existing wall will be modest in most places (approximately 0.25m along most of the section). Between Mount Prospect Avenue and Causeway Road this will vary between 0.25m and 1.0 metres.

5. Closure of slipways and access to beach There are a number of submissions on file in relation to the closure of the two slipways and loss of access to the beach. Response: As proposed by the DPFPP (Boardwalk) Scheme approved by An Bord Pleanála in December 2011, the S2S Interim Scheme proposal includes for the

provision of a continuous flood defence height of 4.25mOD which involves the closure of existing access points to the lagoon. Having regard to the level of concern regarding the loss of amenity contained within the submissions, options for addressing this were considered. A presentation was made to NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Services) on the request for access to the beach.

The initial proposal proposed to remove all access to the beach along Clontarf Road and James Larkin Road. Following discussions with the NPWS it is now proposed to maintain the stepped access to the lagoon area lagoon at Dollymount Avenue and at Mount Prospect Avenue. However gates are to be installed across the accesses to ensure flood protection and to restrict access to the public during the wintering bird season to protect the birdlife. The gates will be locked from 15th September to the 31st March winter season and at times of flood risk. Drainage Services have confirmed they have no objection in principle to the flood gates and operation and maintenance.

6. Impact on the Boardwalk/Promenade proposal There are a number of submissions on file in relation to the provision of the promenade/boardwalk as granted per the Dollymount Promenade and Flood Protection Project (DPFPP).

Response: Funding is not currently available to construct the full Dollymount Promenade & Flood Protection Project (boardwalk) scheme at this time. The NTA has however identified a limited amount of funding to develop the S2S between the Wooden Bridge and Causeway Road. The most ecologically sensitive phases of the works are also the most expensive elements of the DPFPP (Phases 1, 3 and 4). This S2S Interim Works proposes to construct Phase 2 and Phase 5 of the approved scheme DPFPP at this time. An on road solution has been developed which utilises existing road space to provide an acceptable standard of cycleway along the entire scheme whilst maintaining standard carriageway widths. The scheme proposed does not compromise the future construction of the boardwalk scheme (DPFPP) should funding become available.

7. Traffic Management measures along Dollymount Avenue

One of the submissions suggests that double yellow lines on Dollymount Avenue to be shortened significantly.

Response: Due to the narrow width of Dollymount Avenue and the presence of parking along the southern side of the road, the removal or reduction in length of the double yellow lines on the approach to the junction would reduce the carriageway width to such an extent that Dollymount Avenue could be restricted to accommodating only one way traffic. As this would be in proximity to the junction with Clontarf Road this could have unacceptable implications in terms of traffic backing onto the Clontarf Road.

8. Relocation of Bus Stop outside former Dollymount House

There is a submission on file which suggests the relocation of the northbound bus stop on Clontarf Road from just south of Dollymount Park to the north side of Dollymount Park (in front of the existing commercial units) due to impacts on the proposed apartment development in particular:

1. Noise for new apartments

2. Visually intrusive for occupants

3. Better location north of Dollymount Park in front of commercial units

4. May impact on fire tender access for new development.

Response: The location of the proposed bus stop has been identified to optimise parking and safety of road users. The proposed bus stop location is only 20 metres from the existing bus stop location and will create no additional impacts compared with the current location. It is not expected that the location of the bus stop will have any negative impacts on the property in question.

9. Construction of Watermain

There are concerns regarding the construction of the proposed watermain.

Response: The construction of the watermain has planning approval and is an objective of Dublin City Council. In these stringent economic times Dublin City Council has identified the possibility of avoiding reconstruction works on the Clontarf/James Larkin Road on two separate occasions in a short space of time. It would be appropriate from an environmental, financial and public disturbance perspective to lay the pipe for this 2km section of the NCAM while the road is being reconstructed as part of the S2S Cycleway & Footway Interim Works Scheme. By combining the works for the NCAM into the Interim Scheme it is hoped to:

• reduce the construction impacts of 2 separate contracts on the residents of the Clontarf area;

• provide significant cost savings in terms of carriageway reconstruction traffic management costs and site supervision costs etc.; and

• reduce the duration of the works and potential disturbance to birds and other wildlife in Dublin Bay.

10. Lack of public consultation

A number of submissions contend that there was a lack of public consultation and a lack of facilities to display the scheme.

Response: The proper Part VIII consultation procedures were followed. The proposal was presented to the North Central Area Committee prior to the lodgement of the proposal. Regarding the display of the proposal there was limited availability of a public building that would be open and manned between the hours of 9am to 5pm on Monday to Friday in proximity to the scheme. A number of venues to display the scheme were considered including the Red Stables in St. Anne’s Park, however Raheny Library was the only venue that was suitable for the purpose of public display.

11. Visual Impact of the scheme

There are some concerns regarding the visual impact of the scheme.

Response: Other than minor increases in the flood protection height, varying up to a maximum of 1.0 metres in height the proposal will not have any significant visual obstruction or deterioration. The scheme as proposed will enhance the scenic beauty by removing the DCC pumping station and placing it below ground and by renovating the tram shelter.

Conclusion The proposed S2S Interim works are considered to be an important step in improving infrastructure for cycling and for encouraging more cycling throughout the city. The project when completed will provide 2km of cycleway between the Bull Wall and Causeway Road tying in with the existing cycleway on either side, thereby providing a continuous 8km cycleway around North Dublin Bay.

The project also conforms to the cycling objectives of the Dublin City Development Plan 2005 – 2011 in addition to relevant national policy such as the national Cycle Policy Framework 2009-2020 and ‘Smarter Travel’. Recommendation It is considered that the proposed development would be fully consistent with the provisions of the Dublin City Development Plan 2011-2017 as it will comply with the relevant policies and objectives contained therein and those also contained within relevant national and regional guidance. It is recommended that the development proceed subject to the following recommendations and amendments.

1. Access to the lagoon shall be maintained by retaining the two existing accesses at Dollymount Avenue and Mount Prospect Avenue, however no access will be provided during the Bird wintering period.

2. Existing Double yellow lines outside the houses between the shops at the junction of Dollymount Park and house number 378 shall be retained.

3. Prior to commencement of development a Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to the Roads and Traffic Division for written agreement and approval.

4. The development shall comply with the Greater Dublin Regional Code of Practice for Drainage Works Version 6.0 (see www.dublincity.ie Forms and Downloads.

5. Details regarding the proposed flood gates, their operation and maintenance shall be agreed with the Drainage Division prior to commencement of development"

6. It is recommended that the development comply with the conditions attached to previously permitted An Bord Pleanála schemes PL29N.JA0008 and PL29N.YA0008 as amended by this proposal.

7. Prior to commencement of significant works on site a Construction Methodology Plan and an Environmental Management Plan, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.

8. As proposed an environmental and monitoring and liaison committee shall be established for the duration of the construction period.

9. As proposed the renovation of the Tram shelter shall be carried out in consultation with the DCC Architects, DCC Conservation and DCC Archaeology Departments.

10. As proposed the construction period for works to the Lagoon shall be restricted to between March and September each year. Any exceptions sought shall be agreed in advance with the National Parks & Wildlife Service. The timing of all other works outside the lagoon shall be agreed with the National Parks and Wildlife Service.

11. The following recommendations of the Dublin City Archaeologist shall be complied with in the development:

a) The developer shall retain a suitably qualified licensed-archaeologist to advise regarding the archaeological implications of site clearance, demolition and/or construction methodology and to make appropriate recommendations for mitigation including detailed survey as necessary.

b) The recommended mitigation measures summarised in the Project report by Roughan O’Donovan Engineers December 2012 section 4.9 shall be undertaken for the scheme.

c) The developer shall allow for the resolution of archaeology (both on site and necessary post excavation) in the project budget and timetable.

d) The developer’s archaeologist shall undertake licensed archaeological monitoring of all demolition and sub-surface works associated with the development including the breaking and removal of any floor slabs, levelling of ground etc.

e) The archaeologist shall consult with and forward their Method Statement in advance of commencement to the City Archaeologist.

f) In the event of archaeological features being located in the course of the

monitoring, the developer shall facilitate the archaeologist in fully recording such features, including if necessary the archaeological excavation of such features. In the event of significant archaeological features on site, the archaeologist retained by the developer shall immediately contact the City Archaeologist. The City Archaeologist (in consultation with the National Monuments Service, Department of Arts Heritage and Gaeltacht) shall determine the further archaeological resolution of the site.

g) A written and digital report containing the results of the archaeological monitoring shall be forwarded on completion to the City Archaeologist and National Monuments Service, Department Arts Heritage and Gaeltacht.

h) Following submission of the final report to the City Archaeologist, where archaeological material is shown to be present, the archaeological paper archive shall be compiled in accordance with the procedures detailed in the Dublin City Archaeological Archive Guidelines (2008 Dublin City Council) and lodged with the Dublin City Library and Archive, 138-144 Pearse Street, Dublin 2.

12. Adequate tree protection measures, to a recognised EU standard, shall be provided

where required for all trees, directly adjoining the route, in accordance with details to be agreed in writing with the Planning Authority prior to the commencement of development and such measures shall remain in place for the duration of the development.

13. Prior to commencement of development the applicant shall contact the Parks Department to ascertain any requirements they may have with regard to post construction reinstatement and proposed landscaping schedule.

This report is submitted to the City Council pursuant to Section 138 of the Local Government Act, 2001 and Section 179 of the Planning and Development Act, 2000, subject to the provisions of Section 139 of the Local Government Act, 2001. Philip Maguire Dublin City Manager 3rd May 2013

CAUSEWAY ROAD

DOLLYMOUNT AVENUE

DOLLYMOUNT PARK

SEAFIELD ROAD EAST

CLO

NTAR

F RO

AD

SOUT

H BU

LL L

AGO

ON

ST. A

NNE'

S PA

RK

POND

WOODEN BRIDGE

CAUSEWAY ROAD

JAMES LA

RKIN R

OAD

CLO

NTA

RF

RO

AD

DOLLYMOUNT AVENUE

DOLLYMOUNT PARK

SEAFIELD ROAD EAST

MOUNT PROSPECT AVENUE

JAM

ES L

ARKI

N RO

AD

SOUT

H BU

LL L

AGO

ON

ST. A

NNE'

S PA

RK

POND

WOODEN BRIDGE

WATERMILL ROAD

Job

No:

Dat

e:S

tatu

s:

Dra

win

g N

o:R

ev:

App

rove

d:

Dra

wn:

Pro

ject

Titl

e

Dat

eS

tage

Rev

isio

nN

o. PR

ELI

MIN

AR

Y

CO

NS

TRU

CTI

ON

AP

PR

OV

AL

Dat

eChk

'dB

yA

pp'd

App

'dD

raw

ing

Title

Sca

le:

Che

cked

:D

esig

ned:

TEN

DE

R

(A1)

DO

NO

T S

CA

LE U

SE

FIG

UR

ED

DIM

EN

SIO

NS

ON

LY

1. © Ordnance Survey Ireland.

All r

ight

s re

serv

ed.

Lice

nce

Num

ber

2012

/22/

CCM

A/D

ublin

Cit

y Co

unci

l.

NO

TES

SU

TTO

N T

O S

AN

DY

CO

VE

CY

CLE

WA

YD

OLL

YM

OU

NT

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

WO

RK

SA

rena

Hou

se, A

rena

Roa

d,S

andy

ford

, Dub

lin 1

8.Te

l : +

353

1 29

4 08

00Fa

x : +

353

1 29

4 08

20e-

mai

l : in

fo@

rod.

iew

ww

.roug

hano

dono

van.

com

Con

sulti

ng E

ngin

eers

Rou

ghan

&O

'Don

ovan

Dra

win

g Lo

catio

n: J

:\201

2\12

135\

Dw

gs\M

isce

llane

ous\

Con

sulta

tion

Mee

ting

Dw

gs\1

2135

- 00

02 -

Bou

ndar

y of

Sch

eme.

dwg

Dec

05,

201

2 - 2

:47p

m

12.1

35

PR

ELI

MIN

AR

Y D

ES

IGN

DR

AW

ING

SB

OU

ND

AR

Y O

F S

CH

EM

E

JD

1:25

00N

OV

EM

BE

R 2

012

MJS

BC

SM

GP

RE

LIM

INA

RY

0002

LE

GE

ND

:B

OU

ND

AR

Y O

F S

CH

EM

E