item #6 ppt 301 ogden

22
Case # 633F Significance & Compatibility Review 301 Ogden Presented By: Jason Lutz Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting Agenda Item # 6 July 25, 2016

Upload: marian-vargas-mendoza

Post on 11-Apr-2017

31 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

Case # 633FSignificance & Compatibility

Review301 Ogden

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 6

July 25, 2016

Page 2: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

CASE # 633F - SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish

100% of the existing main structure inorder to construct a new single familyresidence with detached accessorystructure.

Page 3: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

3

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-B Northwest corner of Ogden Ln. and

Columbine St.

Page 4: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

4

Page 5: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

5

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 5,932 5,932Main House Footprint 928 1,429Front PorchSide Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear PorchGarage Footprint 288Carport Footprint 312Shed(s) Footprint 75BreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 1,216 / 5,932 1,741 / 5,932Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 20% 29%

Page 6: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

6

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 5,932 5,932Main House 1st Floor 928 1,429Main House 2nd Floor 1,166Garage 1st Floor 288Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures 312FAR / Lot Area 1,216 /

5,932 2,907 / 5,932

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 12% 49%

Page 7: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

7

POLICY ANALYSIS

Bonuses Granted: 2% for a one story accessory structure. 2% for a parking area that utilized

side/alley access. 26’in height (max allowed 28’).

Page 8: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

Complies with all regulations concerningsetbacks, height, and loomingstandards.

Building Materials Hardie siding Vertical board and batten. Asphalt Shingle Roof

Page 9: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

Existing 928sq. ft. home was built in1953.

(Significance Review) No evidence thatthe home was: built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

Page 10: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

10

EXISTING SITE PLAN

Page 11: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

11

EXISTING STRUCTURE

Page 12: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

12

EXISTING STRUCTURE

Page 13: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

13

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

Page 14: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

14

FRONT ELEVATION

Page 15: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

15

REAR ELEVATION

Page 16: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

16

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION (COLUMBINE)

Page 17: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

17

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

Page 18: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

18

RENDERING

Page 19: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

19

STREETSCAPE

Page 20: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

20

ARB RECOMMENDATION

ARB Review – July 19, 2016

No significance in existing structure

Replacement structure is compatible

Approved as presented

Page 21: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

21

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (0)

Oppose: (0)

Page 22: Item #6   ppt 301 ogden

QUESTIONS?