item 1: - uk chamber of shipping … · web viewitem 1: adoption of the ... (fpso) installation....

Fifth session of the IMO’s Sub-committee on Navigation, Communications and Search & Rescue (NCSR 5), 19 - 23 February 2018

ICS briefing

ITEM 1: ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

The Sub-Committee will consider and adopt the provisional agenda (NCSR 5/1).

Papers:

1 Provisional agenda Secretariat

The Secretariat provides the provisional agenda for the fifth session of the Navigation, Communications and Search and Rescue Sub-Committee (NCSR 5).

1/1 Annotations to the provisional agenda Secretariat

The Secretariat provides annotations to the provision agenda for NCSR 5.

1/2 Arrangements for working, experts and drafting groups at NCSR 5

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides the provisional timetable for the session:

The Secretariat and Chair propose the establishment of the following drafting and working groups at NCSR 5:

Navigation Working Group (WG 1 – agenda items 7, 8, 6, 22); Communications Working Group (WG 2 – agenda items 11, 12, 14); SAR Working Group (WG 3 – 15, 16, 17, 18); Experts Group on ships' routeing (EG – agenda item 3); and Drafting Group to be decided (DG – agenda item [4]).

The Secretariat intends to represent ICS in Plenary, WG 1 and the EG (if required).

Members attending NCSR 4 are invited:

1. To advise the ICS Secretariat of the Working and Drafting Groups they plan to attend; and2. To raise any concerns arising during the meeting, either with a member of the ICS Secretariat or with the ICS bench in Plenary.

ITEM 2: DECISIONS OF OTHER IMO BODIES

The Sub-Committee will be informed of the relevant decisions made and actions taken by other bodies of the Organization and will be invited to take action, as appropriate, under the respective agenda items.

Papers:

2 Outcome of FAL 41, MSC 98 and MEPC 71 Secretariat

Agenda item 2 – Decisions of other IMO bodies

MSC 98 considered document MSC 98/17/2 (FOEI, WWF and Pacific Environment) drawing attention to the marine mammal avoidance provisions in part I-A, chapter 11 (Voyage planning) of the Polar Code. The submission reviewed data and communication tools relevant to the implementation of these provisions. The Committee invited Member States and relevant international organizations to report on the status of their collection of marine mammal information and their communication of this information to Masters of ships transiting polar waters.

MEPC 71 considered document MEPC 71/16/7 (FOEI et al.) (also submitted to MSC 98 as document MSC 98/17/2) and noted the outcome of MSC 98. The Committee also noted document MEPC 71/INF.38 (CSC et al.) outlining case studies that illustrated how marine mammal avoidance strategies might be incorporated into voyage planning. The Committee invited Member States and international organizations to submit to the NCSR Sub-Committee information on the status of their collection of marine mammal information and their communication of this information to masters transiting polar waters, in line with the decision taken by MSC 98.

Agenda item 3 – Routeing measures and mandatory ship reporting systems

MEPC 71 adopted resolution MEPC.294(71) on Designation of the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area.

MEPC 71 did not review in detail the proposal in MEPC 71/8/1 and MEPC 71/INF.24 (Malaysia) to designate the Pulau Kukup (Kukup Island) and Tanjung Piai (Cape Piai) (PK-TP) parks as a PSSA. The Committee noted the intention of Malaysia to submit a proposal for the establishment of an area to be avoided (ATBA) and mandatory no anchoring area (MNAA) in the vicinity of PK-TP to NCSR 5.

A proposal for the establishment of an ATBA and MNAA in the vicinity of PK-TP has not been submitted under agenda item 3.

Agenda item 8 – Develop guidance on definition and harmonization of the format and structure of Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs)

MSC 98 agreed to activate the IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on Data Modelling (HGDM) to work only on the output to "Develop guidance on definition and harmonization of the format and structure of MSPs". The Committee endorsed the holding of the first meeting of this Group from 16 to 20 October 2017.

Agenda item 11 – Revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV for Modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), including related and consequential amendments to other existing instruments

In response to the proposal from NCSR 4 (NCSR 4/29, annex 12), MSC 98 agreed to include in the 2018-2019 biennial agenda of the NCSR Sub-Committee and the provisional NCSR 5, an output on "Revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV for Modernization of the GMDSS, including related and consequential amendments to other existing instruments", with a target completion date of 2021. The work is to be conducted in association with the HTW and SSE Sub-Committees.

The Committee further agreed, in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1481 and MSC.1/Circ.1500, that:

The amendments to be developed should apply to all ships to which SOLAS chapter IV applies;

The instrument to be amended was SOLAS, chapters III and IV; and The amendments to be developed should enter into force on 1 January 2024,

provided that they were adopted before 1 July 2022.

Agenda item 13 – Measures to protect the safety of persons rescued at sea

MSC 98 agreed to extend the target completion year for “Measures to protect the safety of persons rescued at sea” to 2019.

Agenda item 20 – Biennial status report and provisional agenda for NCSR 6

MSC 98 agreed to keep the output 5.2.6.1, "Additional modules to the Revised Performance Standards for Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) (resolution MSC.252(83)) relating to the harmonization of bridge design and display of information" in the post-biennial agenda of Committee, in order to be further considered at the appropriate time (MSC 98/23, paragraph 11.9).

2/1 Outcome of III 4 and A 30 Secretariat

Agenda item 20 – Biennial status report and provisional agenda for NCSR 6

A30 adopted the Strategic Plan for the Organization for the six-year period 2018-2023 (resolution A.1110(30)).

A30 adopted Application of the Strategic Plan for the Organization (resolution A.1110(30)).

Agenda item 22 – Any other business (issues in relation to the updating of ECDIS)

III 4 considered matters relating to the updating of existing ECDIS and issued III.2/Circ.2 on Action to be taken by port States on the required updates of ECDIS. This action is subject to endorsement by MSC 99. The Committee invited NCSR 5 to consider the matter of required updates of ECDIS, and the date of revocation of III.2/Circ.2.

ITEM 3: ROUTEING MEASURES AND MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEMS

The Sub-Committee will consider proposals for new or amended routeing measures and mandatory ship reporting systems.

Continuous work item

Papers:

3 Amendment to the existing areas to be avoided (ATBA) "Off the coast of Ghana in the Atlantic Ocean"

Ghana

Ghana proposes to amend the existing IMO adopted areas to be avoided (ATBA) in SN.1/Circ.333 to cover an extended development area of the Offshore Cape Three Point (OCTP) oilfield deep-water port (DWP).

The proposed ATBA would have a 4nm radius around a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) installation. The ATBA is consistent with the current size and justification the ATBA already adopted and referred to in SN.1/Circ.333.

The addition of a further ATBA would not have an adverse impact on international shipping in the region. This reflects the presence and extent of existing ATBA in the vicinity.

It is proposed that the amended ATBA enter into force on six months after adoption by the Committee.

A 4nm ATBA is far greater than the 500m exclusion zone normally implemented around an FPSO. However, Ghana already has an IMO adopted ATBA of a similar size for another FPSO. 5nm is the radius agreed for the previously adopted ATBA.

Adoption may be anticipated to take place at MSC 99 with entry into force on 1 January 2019.

3/1 Establishment of Dangan Channel traffic separation scheme and associated measures in the Pearl River Estuary

China

China proposes the establishment of the following in the Dangan Channel in the Pearl River Estuary:

Two traffic separation schemes (TSS); A precautionary area; and An inshore traffic zone (ITZ).

The proposed TSSs and additional measures are consistent with existing traffic flows in the area. The width of the proposed traffic lanes in the TSS “Dangan Channel East” and TSS “Dangan Channel West” is 0.6nm with a separation zone of 0.5nm. Whilst the proposed lane and separation zone widths are relatively narrow given the volume of expected traffic, this is:

Aligned with the distribution of existing east-west traffic; and Mitigated by the evidence provided regarding hydrographic surveys (2013 and

2014) and the availability of differential GNSS.

It is proposed that the proposed TSSs and additional measures enter into force on six months after adoption by the Committee.

Whilst evidence of collisions is provided, no IWRAP or similar assessment is presented in support of the proposal. In this regard, questions may be asked regarding the justification of the expected positive effects of the proposed measures.


3/2 Establishment of Recommended directions of traffic flow in Dangan Channel No.2 precautionary area of Dangan Channel traffic separation scheme

China

China proposes to establish recommended directions of traffic flow in “the Dangan Channel No.2 precautionary area” which links the TSS “Dangan Channel East” with the TSS “Dangan Channel West” (refer to document NCSR 5/3/1).

The purpose of the recommended direction of traffic flow is anticipated to reduce the risk of collision between ships within the precautionary area.

It is proposed that the proposed recommended directions of traffic flow enter into force six months after adoption by the Committee.

The proposed recommended directions of traffic flow are consistent with the proposal in document NCSR 5/3/1 and provide additional clarity regarding the anticipated movements of ships transiting the precautionary area.


3/3 General overview for establishment of traffic separation scheme and other routeingmeasures in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden provide a general introduction for the proposals to establish traffic separation schemes and other routeing measures in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden. These are proposed as associated protective measures (APM), where applicable, to the existing PSSA in the Baltic Sea.

The purpose of the routeing measures is to organize the flow of ship traffic in more predictable ways. This document is submitted in support of the proposals in documents NCSR 5/3/4 and 5/3/5.

The overall proposal contained in documents NCSR 5/3/4 and 5/3/5 is a comprehensive and considered approach to the management of traffic flows in the Kattegat. Whilst there is potential to challenge the recommendations on pilotage in the approaches to the Baltic

Sea as a result, it is not intended to raise this at this session.

3/4 Establishment of traffic separation schemes and associated routeing measures in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden propose to establish new traffic separation schemes (TSS) and associated routeing measures in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden.

The proposal is for the following routeing measures in the vicinity of Skagen:

A TSS "Skagen West" to the north of Skagen; A TSS "Skagen East" to the northeast of Skagen; A precautionary area between TSS "Skagen West" and TSS "Skagen East”; and An inshore traffic zone (ITZ) south of TSS "Skagen West", the precautionary area

"off Skagen", and the west of TSS “Skagen East”.

The proposal also include the following routeing measures for the west coast of Sweden:

A TSS "Fladen"; A TSS "Lilla Middelgrund" A TSS "Entrance to the Sound"; An ITZ to the west of the TSS "Entrance to the Sound"; and An ITZ to the east of the TSS "Entrance to the Sound".

The routeing measures proposed are intended for vessels with a draught of 10m of less, given that such vessels will be recommended to use the new Route S rather than Route T when transiting east of Skagen (see NCSR 5/3/5). The measures are generally aligned with existing traffic flows, although it is expected that the intensity of traffic navigating in proximity to the Swedish coast will increase due to new recommended Route S.

The proposal is supported by an IWRAP analysis presented in document NCSR 5/INF.3.

It is proposed that the routeing measures enter into force on 1 July 2020.

A graphical summary of the proposed measures is provided at the end of this section of the brief.

Adoption may be anticipated to take place at MSC 99.

3/5 Establishment of deep-water routes, recommended routes and precautionary area in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden propose to establish deep-water routes and other routeing measures in the vicinity of Kattegat between Denmark and Sweden.

Specifically it is proposed that:

A deep-water route "Kattegat North” to be established in the northern part of the recommended route T in Kattegat. Minimum depth 19m;

A deep-water route "Kattegat South" to be established in the southern part of the

recommended route T in Kattegat. Minimum depth 19m; A recommended route T be established connecting the proposed TSS "Skagen

East", the deep-water routes "Kattegat North" and "Kattegat South" and joining the nationally implemented Route T north of the TSS "at Hatter Barn" in Kattegat;

A precautionary area "at Kummel Bank" between the TSS "Skagen East" and the TSS "Fladen" where recommended route T and the recommended route S join;

A recommended route S be established, connecting the proposed precautionary area "at Kummel Bank", the TSS "Fladen", "Lilla Middelgrund" and "Entrance to the Sound" off the west coast of Sweden; and

A recommended route A and a recommended route B be established to the west of Skagen.

Recommended routes A, B, S and T are generally aligned with existing traffic flows, although Route T would increase the distance to be travelled by ships transiting the Sound by 2.5%. The deep water routes will be recommended for ships with a draft of 10m or more.

The proposal is supported by an IWRAP analysis presented in document NCSR 5/INF.3.

It is proposed that the routeing measures enter into force on 1 July 2020.

A graphical summary of the proposed measures is provided at the end of this section of the brief.

Adoption may be anticipated to take place at MSC 99.

3/6 Amendments to the existing mandatory ship reporting system in the Torres Strait Region and the Inner Route of the Great Barrier Reef

Australia and Papua New Guinea

Australia and Papua New Guinea propose an amendment to the IMO-adopted ship reporting system (SRS) in the Torres Strait Region and the Inner Route of the Great Barrier Reef (REEFREP) (resolution MSC.52(66), as amended by MSC.161(78) and MSC.315(88)).

The amendments reflect technical, operational and administrative changes to REEFREP since it was adopted by the Organization in 1996.

The amendments proposed include:

Changes to the VHF radio channels used for voice communications; Relocation of the Vessel Traffic Service centre that operates REEFREP, from Hay

Point to Townsville, Queensland (north-east Australia); The implementation of AIS as the primary source of position reporting throughout

the area; Simplification of the mandatory reporting requirements for participating ships by

removing the designated Mandatory Reporting Points (MRP). It is proposed to remove these MRPs from the charts and associated publications; and

Amending the existing REEFREP area. This will exclude an area which is not within the IMO designated Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) and in which there are no significant navigational challenges.

No amendments are proposed to:

The categories of ships required to participate in the SRS; The rules and regulations in force in the area of the system; and The measures to be taken if a ship fails to comply.

It is considered that the proposed amendments will not result in any additional obligations for participating ships

Given the changes to the MRPs, changes are proposed to the geographical positions for submitting Entry and Exit (or Final Reports). Entry reports will now be required at least one hour before the ship enters the REEFREP area, or departs from a port in the REEFREP area. When departing the REEFREP area, ships will be required to provide an Exit report.

Between Entry and Exit Reports, intermediate reporting information will be obtained via AIS, unless AIS is unavailable. Route deviation and Defect reports will continue to be required, as appropriate.



ICS thanks Australia and Papua New Guinea for the proposals contained in document NCSR 5/3/6 and recommends support for the proposed amendments to the mandatory ship reporting system in the Torres Strait. In particular, ICS welcomes the review of the reporting requirements in light of the reporting opportunity presented by monitoring AIS and the consequential reduction in administrative burdens for Masters and Bridge Teams.

3/7 Establishment of two-way routes and precautionary areas in the Bering Sea and Bering Strait

Russian Federation and the United States

The Russian Federation and United States provide a proposal to establish six recommendatory two-way routes for vessels of 400 gross tonnage and above, and six precautionary areas, in the Bering Sea and Bering Strait.

The proposed recommendatory two-way routes are generally aligned with existing traffic patterns.



3/8 Establishment of three new areas to be avoided in the Bering Sea

United States

The United States proposed the establishment of three recommendatory areas to be avoided (ATBA) in the Bering Sea: Nunivak Island, King Island and St Lawrence Island.

The ATBA would apply to ships of 400 gross tonnage and above.

It is proposed that the amended ATBA enter into force on six months after adoption by the Committee. Adoption may be anticipated to take place at MSC 99 with entry into force on 1 January 2019.

Whilst the extents of the ATBA for Nunivak Island and King Island appear reasonable, it is unclear whether the extent of the St Lawrence Island ATBA (specifically to the south and west of the island) is justified by the evidence presented in the submission.

ICS thanks the United States for the proposal in document NCSR 5/3/8. Notwithstanding the potential need for an ATBA in the vicinity of St Lawrence Island, ICS questions whether the extent of the ATBA proposed is justified by the evidence provided and recommends further careful consideration of this element of the proposal.

3/INF.3 Report on the sea traffic and consequence analysis and IWRAP Mk2 analysis related to proposals for new routeing measures in the vicinity of Kattegatbetween Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden

Denmark and Sweden provide a report of the sea traffic and impact analysis and IWRAP Mk2 analysis for new routeing measures in Skagerrak and Kattegat. The report is provided as background information for the proposals submitted in documents NCSR 5/3/3, NCSR 5/3/4 and NCSR 5/3/5.

The relevant information provided in the report is:

The risk of collisions are decreased by nearly 8% per year if the proposed routeing measures are introduced;

Redirected transit traffic through Kattegat via new Route S will increase the intensity of traffic along the Swedish coast (draught of 10 metres or less);

The shallow water effects and associated additional resistance is lower in the proposed Route S than in the current transit route. Total fuel consumption is expected to be lowered by 6%;

The ships transiting Kattegat in Route T via the Great Belt will have an increase in transit distance by 2.5%. This will increase total fuel consumption by 3%; and

If the increased distance in Route T is compensated for by corresponding speed increases fuel consumption is estimated to increase by 9%; and

Overall, if transit speeds remain unchanged, it is estimated that fuel consumption and associated emissions will be reduced by 1%.

IWRAP is a modelling tool useful for maritime risk assessment. IWRAP can estimate the frequency of collisions and groundings in a given waterway based on information about

traffic volume/composition, route geometry and bathymetry.

3/INF.5 Information on ships' routeing in the EEZ for Norway Norway

Norway provides information on the status and need for review of three ships' routeing systems in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Norway.

3/INF.23 Information on Routing Measures and Mandatory Ship Reporting Systems in Lombok Strait, Indonesia

Indonesia

Indonesia provides information on the anticipated proposal for ship routeing measures and a mandatory ship reporting system for Lombok Strait.

3/INF.24 Information on Routeing Measures and Mandatory Ship Reporting Systems in Sunda Strait, Indonesia

Indonesia

Indonesia provides information on the anticipated proposal for ship routeing measures and a mandatory ship reporting system for Sunda Strait.

Summary diagram of measures proposed by Denmark and Sweden in documents NCSR 5/3/3, NCSR 5/3/4 and NCSR 5/3/5

ITEM 4: UPDATES TO THE LRIT SYSTEM

The Sub-Committee will consider:

1. The report of the LRIT Coordinator on the review and audit of the performance of LRIT Data Centres and/or of the International LRIT Data Exchange; and

2. Any other documents that may be submitted under this agenda item.


Papers:

4 Developments on LRIT since NCSR 4 Secretariat

The Secretariat provides information on developments since NCSR 4, including:

The functioning and operation of the LRIT Data Distribution Plan and the Information Distribution Facility;

The outcomes of the periodical meetings of the LRIT Operational Governance Body;

The renewal process for certificates; and The Second modification testing phase of the LRIT system.

4/1 Performance of the LRIT system and recommendations by the LRIT Coordinator

IMSO

Replaced by document NCSR 5/4/1/Rev.1

4/1/Rev.1 Performance of the LRIT system and recommendations by the LRIT Coordinator

IMSO

IMSO provides information on the Summary audit reports of LRIT Data Centres and of the International LRIT Data Exchange.

4/2 Complementary information to the proposal for a new "Archived SURPIC request message" for coastal States

Viet Nam

Viet Nam provides complementary information to support the discussion on document NCSR 4/4/4 (Viet Nam) regarding the implementation of a new "Archived SURPIC request message".

4/3 Proposed amendments for MSC.1/Circ.1259/Rev.7 China

China proposes amendments on Long-Range Identification and Tracking System, Technical documentation (Part I) (MSC.1/Circ.1259/Rev.7) to correct minor errors.

4/4 Summary audit reports of LRIT Data Centres and the International LRIT Data Exchange

IMSO

IMSO provides a summary of audit reports of LRIT Data Centres and of the International LRIT Data Exchange completed by IMSO and reported to the Organization since 2014.

4/INF.6 Status of the International LRIT Data Exchange system EC

The European Commission provides information regarding the status of the International LRIT Data Exchange in the production environment of the LRIT system during 2017.

4/INF.14 Scale of charges to be levied by the LRIT Coordinator during 2018

IMSO

IMSO provides information on the scale of the charges to be levied by the LRIT Coordinator during 2018.

4/INF.21 IMSO Seminar on Effective Implementation and Management of the LRIT System

IMSO

IMSO provides information about the international seminar on Long Range Identification and Tracking of Ships (LRIT) system.

ITEM 5: APPLICATION OF THE "INDIAN REGIONAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM (IRNSS)" IN THE MARITIME FIELD AND DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE IRNSS RECEIVER EQUIPMENT

The Sub-Committee will consider the recognition of the satellite navigation system "Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS)" as a future component of the World-Wide Radionavigation System (WWRNS).

The Sub-Committee will develop performance standards for shipborne IRNSS receiver equipment.

Target completion year: 2019

Papers:

5 Preliminary review of the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS)

India

India provides an introduction to the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS). The introduction includes information on system service capability, system testing and application.

Further information and detailed data will be provided. However, India seeks an indication of the information and data needed by the Sub-Committee for a full evaluation of the system.

5/1 Proposed draft performance standards for shipborne IRNSS receiver equipment

India

India provides a draft performance standard for shipborne IRNSS receiver equipment. The draft performance standard is based on the performance standards for GNSS systems which are already a component of the WWRNS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou and Galileo) and the maritime requirements specified in:

Worldwide radionavigation system (resolution A.1046(27)); and Revised maritime policy and requirements for a future global navigation satellite

system (GNSS) (resolution A.915(22)).

ITEM 6: GUIDELINES FOR THE HARMONIZED DISPLAY OF NAVIGATION INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT


1. The draft Guidelines for the harmonized display of navigation information received via communications equipment, taking into account the report of the Correspondence Group (NCSR 5/6); and



Papers:

6 Report of the Correspondence Group Norway

Norway provides the report of the Correspondence Group on the development of the draft Guidelines for the harmonized display of navigation information received via communications equipment.

The Guidelines as drafted provide principles governing the display of information received by any means from any type of communications equipment. The objective is to ensure effective decision making and safe navigation by the proper integration and presentation of information received via communication equipment.

ICS participated in the correspondence group and is supportive of the current direction in which the Guidelines are developing.

6/1 Integration and presentation of available navigation-related information exchange via communication equipment by integrating VHF/MF/HF DSC into INS

Ukraine

Ukraine proposes the drafting of guidelines for integration and presentation of available navigation-related information provided by VHF/MF/HF Digital Selective Calling (DSC). In particular it is proposed to integrate this information in the conning display of an integrated navigation system (INS).

No amendments will be required to the existing ECDIS Performance Standards (resolution MSC.232(82)).

Whilst the proposal by the Ukraine is specific to DSC, a related issue for SES has been highlighted by the United States under agenda item 9. Both should be considered as addressing the same fundamental question: should distress alerts and distress relays be displayed on navigation and other displays? If yes, then this be done in a harmonized manner.

This could require further work on section 7 of the annex to NCSR 5/6 and consequential amendments to the Guidelines for the presentation of navigational-related symbols, terms and abbreviations (SN/Circ.243/Rev.1).

ICS thanks the Ukraine for the proposal in document NCSR 5/6/1. ICS recommends that, regardless of the communications equipment which provides the information

(SES, DSC, AIS) distress alerts and distress alert relays should be graphically displayed on navigation displays on the bridge.

Consequently, it may be appropriate to further consider the proposal by Ukraine in document NCSR 5/6/1 and related matters highlighted by the US in NCSR 5/9/4 when further developing section 7 of the annex to document NCSR 5/6.

However, in both cases additional symbols may need be to be included in Guidelines for the presentation of navigational-related symbols, terms and abbreviations (SN/Circ.243/Rev.1). Whilst such amendments may be considered consequential, they may also be considered outside the current scope of this work item.

ITEM 7: GUIDELINES ON STANDARDIZED MODES OF OPERATION, S-MODE

The Sub-Committee will consider the development of Guidelines on standardized modes of operation (S-mode) for all navigational equipment.


Papers:

7 Draft Guideline Australia, the Republic of Korea, BIMCO, CIRM, IAIN, IEC, InterManager and the Nautical Institute

Australia et al provide a first draft Guideline for the Standardized (or S) Mode of operation of navigational equipment.

The draft guideline has been developed using by user needs and aims to improve the standardization of the human interface of electronic navigation equipment. It is considered that when applied at the design stage, the guideline enhances the safe and effective navigation of ships and will reduce the time needed for familiarization with electronic navigation equipment.

Electronic navigation equipment would be designed based on the following principles:

Consistency: Standard vocabulary, symbols and icons, groupings of functions and standard locations for information;

Recognition; Frequency of use; Visibility of system status; Reflecting real world use; Preventing errors and providing a means to return to a default setting; Tailoring to experience levels; and Help and documentation.

Further validation testing during 2018 is proposed in order to provide information to finalise the Guideline at NCSR 6.

The application of the proposed draft Guideline includes but is not limited to ECDIS.

The document described guidance on a general approach to standardisation rather than the implementation of a specific, separate mode on systems like ECDIS. Whilst many considered that a separate mode would be beneficial, the Secretariat is concerned that a separate mode may:

Increase rather than reduce the ECDIS familiarization burden (familiarisation with two modes separately in the ECDIS installed on board);

Increase in the cost of ECDIS systems which have two separate operational modes rather than a single mode; and

Increase complexity in the software required to run ECDIS, with the potential for increased instances of anomalies, system failures and potentially more complex implementation of upgrades.

ICS would like to thank Australia et al for the work provided in document NCSR 5/7.

ICS welcomes the overall approach contained within the Guidelines which should see electronic navigation systems designed to minimize variation in the user interfaces, enhance recognition, prevent errors, and encourage further use of single or simple operator actions to access specific functions.

We would however offer a word of caution. Whilst this guidance should reduce the time that it takes for individual seafarers to complete familiarisation, the statement in paragraph 2 of the annex that “Application of this guideline to the design and testing of navigation equipment aims to limit the need for familiarization of equipment as required by the ISM Code and STCW Convention” is an unhelpful message.

The process of familiarization may be made more straightforward if these Guidelines are applied but the requirement for proper familiarization with navigation is not limited by them.

Notwithstanding the previous comment, ICS recommends support for the guidelines so far developed as the basis for an IMO guideline on S-Mode.

7/INF.13 Results of the S-Mode user preference test Republic of Korea

The Republic of Korea provides information regarding the results of a research project carried out by Republic of Korea on "S-Mode user preference test (for ECDIS)".

The web-based test was conducted on ECDIS users worldwide for a period of two months from October to November 2017. The results are provided to assist in the development of guidance on S-Mode.

7/INF.15 Research document on the human cognitive processes in maritime icon and displaystandardization and automated systems

Australia

Australia provides information on how:

Human factors and cognitive science research that can inform system design; and Ship's system, information displays and the human element can form a distributed

cognition team.

ITEM 8: DEVELOP GUIDANCE ON DEFINITION AND HARMONIZATION OF THE FORMAT AND STRUCTURE OF MARITIME SERVICE PORTFOLIOS


1. The definition and harmonization of the format and structure of MSPs;2. Develop guidance on the appropriate communication channels used for the

electronic exchange of information between shore and ship. This includes any necessary coordination mechanisms and transitional arrangements that may be required; and

3. The outcome of the work undertaken by the Harmonization Group on Data Modelling (HGDM), at its first session from 16 to 20 October 2017; and



Papers:

8 Report of the first meeting of the IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on Data Modelling

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides the report of the first meeting of the IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on Data Modelling (HGDM), which was held at IMO Headquarters from 16 to 20 October 2017.

The Sub-Committee is invited to:

1. Note the first draft of the Guidance on the definition and harmonization of the format and structure of maritime services within the Maritime Service Portfolio (MSP), including the template for maritime services (annex);

Whilst ICS appreciates that the Guidance is a first draft, it is of potential concern that the document re-iterates the leadership and coordination role for the Organization in the harmonized implementation of Maritime Services but does not provide Guidance on how this can be achieved. For example, how is a proposal for a Maritime Service to be assessed by the Organization and determined as being harmonized? What process will be followed for Maritime Services which are not harmonized?

2. Consider the revised definition of MSP which is more concise and believed to capture the purpose and scope of MSPs better than the existing definition (paragraph 5.2 and section 6 of the annex);

The proposed revised definition aligns with the approach that ICS has previously proposed: a set of maritime services and associated technical services provided in a digital format.

3. Consider inviting international organizations which are domain

coordinating bodies to use the template and to submit completed templates to the Organization as part of testing its purpose and suitability, and in order to be able to facilitate the completion of the draft Guidance (paragraph 6.7);

4. Note the HGDM's proposal to establish three levels of control and ownership (paragraph 7.3 and section 3 of the annex);

5. Note the view of the Group on the need to harmonize data element IDs for marine services as a key enabler to ensure inter-operability between services (paragraph 8.1);

This matter is further addressed in document NCSR 5/8/2 (BIMCO).

6. Consider informing the FAL Committee on the ongoing discussion of the Group on the harmonization of data element IDs for marine services (paragraphs 8.1 to 8.8);

This matter is related to the discussion in document NCSR 5/8/2 (BIMCO).

7. Consider the proposal to establish a maritime registry, listing all maritime relevant data element IDs, for use in the provision of maritime services, with the Organization as possible host for such registry (paragraph 8.7);


8. Consider requesting coordination with the MSC and FAL Committee on this issue of establishing a maritime registry (paragraph 8.7);


9. Note the Group's discussion on the technical aspects of maritime

services (paragraphs 10.5 to 10.8);

10.Note the Group's concern in respect of the current terms of reference which limit the work to SOLAS-related maritime services (paragraph 12.3);

ICS has monitored and contributed to discussions on Maritime Services provided in a digital format for some time. It is our view that until the provisions of SOLAS related Maritime Services is enabled and delivered, the scope of the work should be limited to these services. We also see the fundamental issue here being one of providing member States with obligations under mandatory IMO instruments with the Guidance required to transition to digital provision of information. Whilst there is an appetite for creating an “ecosystem of maritime services” by some, international

shipping recommends a strong preference for starting this work with an “ecosystem for mandatory Maritime Services”.

11. Invite the Committee to approve the holding of a second meeting of the HGDM (paragraph 12.4); and

12.Note the report in general.

8/1 Draft terms of reference for the second meeting of the IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on Data Modelling

Secretariat

The Secretariat provide the draft terms of reference for the second meeting of the IMO/IHO HGDM for consideration by the Sub-Committee.

8/2 Harmonized data element ID structure BIMCO

BIMCO proposes to establish a database containing data element identities (ID) for harmonized use when providing Maritime Services.

The register should be harmonized and standardized in order to ensure interoperability between services and to facilitate direct exchange of information. This should include support for machine-to-machine (M2M) communication.

It is proposed that the register should include IMO data elements, but also data sets from other international bodies. This would include ISO data models for electronic port clearance and data models from the World Customs Organization (WCO).

Whilst the intent of the proposal is something which should be supported, there are potentially significant policy (rather than technical) issues with the IMO creating a database which incorporates data from other international organizations. Such issues could reflect the ongoing friction within the FAL Committee between the various international organizations which develop and provide data models for exchange of data between ship and shore.

8/3 Comments on document NCSR 5/8 IALA

IALA comments on the report of the first meeting of the IMO/IHO HGDM in document NCSR 5/8 (Secretariat). The focus of the comment paper is on providing a description of the IALA Guideline on Specification of e-navigation technical services requested by the HGDM.

ITEM 9: UPDATING OF THE GMDSS MASTER PLAN AND GUIDELINES ON MSI (MARITIME SAFETY INFORMATION) PROVISIONS

The Sub-Committee will:

1. Consider and analyse matters relating to the further development of the GMDSS master plan on shore-based facilities; and

2. Consider any submissions relating to the development of guidelines on MSI provisions.


Papers:

9 Outcome of the ninth session of the IHO World-Wide Navigational Warning Service Sub-Committee

IHO

IHO provides on the matters discussed and decisions taken at the ninth session of the IHO WWNWS Sub-Committee which was held from 28 August to 1 September 2017.

9/1 Update on the Worldwide Met-Ocean Information and Warning Service

WMO

WMO provides updates, plans and activities undertaken by the newly formed Worldwide Met-Ocean Information and Warning Service (WWMIWS) Committee of the Joint Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM).

9/2 Promulgation of Maritime Safety Information - NAVTEX Service

Chair of the International NAVTEX Coordinating Panel

The Chair of the International NAVTEX Coordinating Panel provides a summary of the current issues being addressed by the International NAVTEX Coordinating Panel.

9/3 NAVTEX service area of the Republic of Cyprus Cyprus

Cyprus provides information on the provision of NAVTEX in the Eastern Mediterranean.

9/4 Displaying distress alert relay information on shipboard navigation display systems

United States

The United States highlights that the Performance standards for a ship earth station for use in the GMDSS (resolution MSC.434(98)) requires that GMDSS ship earth stations provide an interface to report a ship's identifier and location from a received distress alert relay to navigation display systems.

The United States notes that IEC standards and IHO World-wide Navigation Warning Service (WWNWS) Enhance Group Calling (EGC) Manuals will be affected by this requirement.

It is proposed to refer the issue to the correspondence group on the development of Guidelines for the harmonized display of navigation information received via communications equipment.

The question posed by the United States is similar, in principle, to the matters included in the proposal in document NCSR 5/6/1 (Ukraine).

The intervention below is not needed if the approach proposed in response to NCSR 5/6/1 is taken forward by the Sub-Committee.

ICS thanks the United States for document NCSR 5/9/4 and in particular for highlighting the relationship between the amendments to resolution MSC.434(98) and the work under agenda item 6.

ICS recommends that, regardless of the communications equipment which provides the information (SES, DSC and AIS), distress alerts and distress alert relays should be graphically displayed on navigation displays on the bridge.

Consequently, it may be appropriate to further consider section 7 of the annex to document NCSR 5/6. This could be further developed to include presentation issues relating to the display of distress alerts and distress alert received from any communications equipment, on any display.

9/5 Comments on document NCSR 5/9/3 Turkey

Turkey responds to the information provided in document NCSR 5/9/3.

ITEM 10: CONSEQUENTIAL WORK RELATED TO THE NEW POLAR CODE


1. The consequential work on matters within the purview of the NCSR Sub-Committee related to the new Polar Code, taking into account the report of the Correspondence Group (NCSR 5/10); and



Papers:

10 Report of the Correspondence Group Germany

Germany provides information on the development of a common document to supplement performance standards for navigation and communication equipment used in polar waters.

It is advised that “General guidance for navigation and communications equipment intended for use on ship operating in polar waters” should be developed. Optional remarks could be added to equipment certificates, as applicable.

The guidance would include:

Part 1 - General environmental conditions for equipment Part 2 - Equipment specific requirements.

The approach is designed to ensure that equipment not used in Polar Waters is unaffected by any recommendations included in the guidance.

The approach is aligned with the approach proposed by ICS at NCSR 4.

ICS thanks Germany for the report of the correspondence group and can recommend support in principle for the development of General guidance for navigation and communications equipment intended for use on ship operating in polar waters.

ITEM 11: REVISION OF SOLAS CHAPTERS III AND IV FOR MODERNIZATION OF THE GLOBAL MARITIME DISTRESS AND SAFETY SYSTEM (GMDSS), INCLUDING RELATED AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO OTHER EXISTING INSTRUMENTS


1. The revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV for Modernization of the GMDSS, including related and consequential amendments to other existing instruments, taking into account the report of the Correspondence Group (NCSR 5/11);

2. Relevant parts of the report of the thirteenth meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group (NCSR 5/12)’ and



Papers:

11 Report of the Correspondence Group United States

The United States provides the report of the correspondence group which includes comments and suggested revisions to SOLAS chapters III and IV, and the plan for revision of related instruments.

The report includes recommendations for changes to the draft revision of both SOLAS chapters relating to the following matters:

Scope of application of SOLAS chapter III; Clarification of the meaning of “present regulations” in the scope of SOLAS chapter

IV; Definition of “bridge-to-bridge communications”; Definition of “EPIRB”; Definition of “other communications”; Definition of "9GHz" and "SART"; Clarification of the non-GMDSS functional requirement “transmitting and receiving

other communications to and from shore-based systems or networks”; Remote activation of EPRIB; Changes to the requirements for secondary ship-to-shore distress alert. This would

remove the option to have a second VHF radio installation using DSC because this would violate the requirement to use a different (and independent) radiocommunications service.

The proposed recommendations are not anticipated to have any substantive impact on the requirements of SOLAS chapter III and IV as they apply to international shipping.

11/1 Phasing out the Radar SART United States

The United States provides an analysis of the effectiveness of radar Search and Rescue Transponders (SART) and proposes a gradual phasing out of radar SART in favour of Automatic Identification System (AIS) SART.

The IMO/ICAO Joint Working Group on Search and Rescue acknowledged that further

evaluation and actual field testing of both AIS and radar SARTs may need to be conducted to provide the data necessary to make a decision on phasing out.

It is proposed that the IMO/ITU Expert Group consider the outcome of discussions at the IMO/ICAO Joint Working Group on Search and Rescue regarding the relative merits of AIS and radar SART.

11/2 Comments on the reports of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group and the Correspondence Group

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom provides comments on the draft amendments to SOLAS chapter IV. It is proposed that:

Definitions of “GMDSS identities”, “EPIRB” and “conning position” are included in SOLAS regulation IV/2;

The definition of “general radio-communications and other communications” is amended to refine its scope to communications other than “operational or security-related communications”;

The definition of SART in SOLAS regulation IV/7 should align with the definition in the associated performance standard.

The proposals in paragraph 10 of this document on general radio-communications are an alternative proposal to that made by France et al in document NCSR 11/3. Neither proposal changes the carriage requirements for communications equipment.

It is noted that paragraph 82 of document NCSR 5/12 suggests that inclusion of a definition of “EPIRB” in SOLAS chapter IV may require amendments to the Radio Regulations.

11/3 Comments on the Report of the Correspondence Group

Antigua and Barbuda, France, Portugal, WMO and IHO

France et al propose the deletion of any reference to security in SOLAS chapter IV. The justification provided is that:

The high-level review of the GMDSS did not clearly indicate that the Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) should be included in SOLAS chapter IV;

The broadcasting of security-related information required by the ISPS Code is already addressed in paragraph 4.2.3.18 of the Joint IMO/IHO/WMO manual on Maritime Safety Information (MSI) (MSC.1/Circ.1310/Rev.1), making such information a subset of MSI which is already covered by SOLAS chapter IV;

The choice of means of distribution of security-related information should not be limited to systems required under the GMDSS (presumably email);

Including security would be inconsistent and not reflect the Guidance in MSC.1/Circ.1500.

It is concluded that reference to security related communications in SOLAS chapter IV would not be consistent with SOLAS chapter XI-2 and related instruments, and would impair the flexibility offered to Member States with regard to the means of transmitting and receiving security-related information.

This proposal is not aligned with the outcome of the IMO/ITU Expert Group (NCSR 5/12, paragraph 82 to 88) which developed a new definition for “security-related communications” which would require a separate functional requirement in SOLAS regulation IV/4. Amendments were also proposed to SOLAS regulation IV/7.7 to include the capability to send and receive security-related information.

The proposal does not change the carriage requirements for communications equipment.

11/4 Comments on the Report of the Correspondence Group

Antigua and Barbuda, France, Islamic Republic of Iran, Portugal, WMO, IHO and IMRF

France et al comment on the SOLAS regulation IV/4 on GMDSS functional requirements given the simplification of the definition of "general communications" and the provisions of the Radio Regulations.

The purpose is to ensure that the functional requirements help users understand that in addition to distress, there are two other orders of priority (urgency and safety) in communications which can, and should be used as appropriate.

The proposal does not change the carriage requirements for communications equipment.

ITEM 12: RESPONSE TO MATTERS RELATED TO THE RADIOCOMMUNICATION ITU-R STUDY GROUP AND ITU WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE


1. The outcome of the latest meetings of ITU-R Working Parties and Study Groups; and

2. The relevant parts of the report of the thirteenth meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group (NCSR 5/12), on matters related to the maritime mobile and maritime mobile-satellite services.

Annual work item

Papers:

12 Report of the thirteenth meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group on Maritime radiocommunication matters - Including information on Revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV for Modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), including related and consequentialamendments to other existing instruments

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides the report of the thirteenth meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group on Maritime radiocommunication matters. This was held at IMO Headquarters from 10 to 14 July 2017.

12/1 Liaison statement from ITU-R WP 5BAutonomous maritime radio devices

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides a Liaison statement from ITU-R working party 5B regarding autonomous maritime radio devices (AMRD). This related to the working party meeting in June 2017.

12/2 Implementation of WRC-15 decisions relating to the future use of analogue/digital channels as stipulated in appendix 18 of the ITU Radio Regulations

Netherlands

The Netherlands provides information on a letter sent by the Netherlands Administration regarding the preservation of analogue and digital VHF channels until 1 January 2024.

The letter further encourages close cooperation and an unambiguous exchange of information between manufacturers, maintenance service providers, competent authorities, ITU and IMO.

12/3 Liaison statement from ITU-R WP 5B Autonomous maritime radio devices

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides a Liaison statement from ITU-R working party 5B regarding autonomous maritime radio devices (AMRD). This related to the working party meeting in November 2017.

12/4 Development of matters under study in the Radiocommunication - ITU-R Study Groups

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides a report on the work undertaken in the ITU-R Study Groups in 2017.

12/INF.8 Prediction of NAVDAT coverage and related tests China

China provides information on prediction of NAVDAT coverage, and considerations for technology optimization.

12/INF.19 Revised Maritime Radio Communication Plan IALA

IALA provides information on the latest review of the Maritime Radio Communications Plan (MRCP) by IALA.

The current status of radio communication in the maritime mobile bands was discussed and forms the basis of projections for future developments needed to support e-navigation, GMDSS and the development of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS).

ITEM 13: MEASURES TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF PERSONS RESCUED AT SEA

The Sub-Committee will consider submissions related to measures to protect the safety of persons rescued at sea.


Papers:

No papers have been submitted under this agenda item.

ITEM 14: DEVELOPMENTS IN GMDSS SATELLITE SERVICES

The Sub-Committee will consider submissions on developments in GMDSS satellite services, including those related to the recognition of potential new GMDSS satellite services.


Papers:

14 Analysis and assessment of the GMDSS performance of Inmarsat Global Limited

IMSO

IMSO provides the annual report on Inmarsat's public service obligations for the provision of recognized mobile satellite communication services in the GMDSS.

It is concluded that Inmarsat Global Ltd has continued to provide fully operational maritime mobile satellite distress and safety communication services for the GMDSS and fulfilled the company's public service.

The report refers to the protection of L-band maritime satellite communications (INMARSAT C) which has been raised by ICS Members.

The issue is with the potential authorization by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) for the use of the band adjacent to the Inmarsat maritime safety system (MSS) band. There is the potential for interference with Inmarsat terminals.

The report notes that the potential issue can be mitigated by implementing sound and standard network planning and engineering practices, and careful coordination between stakeholders.

IMSO and Inmarsat will closely monitor developments relating to the authorization and its potential consequences.

14/1 Recognition of the Inmarsat FleetBroadband Maritime Safety Data Service for use in the GMDSS

IMSO

IMSO provides the report requested by MSC 98 on the technical and operational assessment of the Inmarsat FleetBroadband Maritime Safety Data Service (MSDS). This report will inform the process for recognition and use in GMDSS.

It is concluded that the Inmarsat FleetBroadband MSDS has met the applicable requirements of the Criteria for the provision of mobile satellite communication systems in the GMDSS (resolution A.1001(25)). The Sub-Committee is informed of the desire of Inmarsat to operate the FleetBroadband MSDS under the name “Fleet Safety”.

14/2 Recognition of Iridium mobile satellite system as GMDSS service provider

IMSO

IMSO provides the report on the technical and operational assessment of the remaining requirements to be address as part of the assessment of the application by Iridium for recognition as a GMDSS service provider.

The report concludes that the actions on the remaining requirements identified (NCSR 3/WP.5, annex 1) have been shown to be in compliance with the Criteria for the provision of mobile satellite communication systems in the GMDSS (resolution A.1001(25)) to the extent applicable to non-geostationary satellite systems.

The further administrative actions required before a letter of compliance can be issued by IMSO are provided. In addition, it is recommended that:

A trial period during which MSI providers and MRCCs are encouraged to use the Iridium system and give their feedback to the Iridium; and

IMO, together with the IHO and the WMO, should consider making arrangements to facilitate broadcast of MSI messages via the Iridium system.

The conclusion of this report means that Iridium remains on track to achieve recognition in 2018 and can continue to expect to commence providing GMDSS services from 2020.

Recalling the discussion on interoperability between mobile satellite service providers recognised for use in the GMDSS, ICS recommends support for the recommendation for a trial period relating to MSI distribution, with a view the offering confidence that an effective solution for interoperability has been selected, implemented and tested. Whilst this might not be a criteria in resolution A.1001(25) it is an important criteria from the perspective of the seagoing users of the GMDSS.

14/3 Status of the Cospas-Sarsat Programme Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat

The Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat provides a status report on the Cospas-Sarsat system.

14/4 Migration of the recognized GMDSS services from Inmarsat-3 to Inmarsat-4 satellites

IMSO

IMSO provides information regarding the planned migration of GMDSS satellite services from the Inmarsat-3 satellite constellation to the Inmarsat-4 satellite constellation.

There will be no impact on GMDSS receive and transmit capability during the migration. No software or firmware upgrades to shipborne Inmarsat terminals will be required during the migration. Updates to the Data Network Identification Codes may be necessary.

There will be no impact over the existing I-4 services such as FleetBroadband or any other commercial services.

Inmarsat has confirmed that the updates to the Data Network Identification codes will be delivered remotely and will not require intervention by ship-board personnel or service technicians.

14/5 Introduction of SafetyNET II IMSO

IMSO provides information in relation to the official launch of the SafetyNET II service by Inmarsat.

SafetyNET II does not require installation of new shipborne terminals and its introduction will appear seamless to seafarers. Reception of MSI messages broadcast through the SafetyNET II service is free of charge to seafarers as per the provisions of Charges for Distress, Urgency and Safety Messages through the Inmarsat System (resolution A.707(17)).

14/6 Potential future revision of resolution A.1001(25) IMSO

IMSO provides observations on applying the procedures of the Criteria for the provision of mobile satellite communication systems in the GMDSS (resolution A.1001(25)) during the recent assessments of:

Inmarsat FleetBroadband Maritime Safety Data Service (MSDS); and Iridium.

Of particular note is that resolution A.1001(25) does not offer any guidance on interoperability between different mobile satellite communication service providers. Relevant arrangements or requirements for interoperability could be incorporated in to the resolution in the future.

ICS considers that interoperability between mobile satellite service providers to enable the timely and effective distribution of MSI and distress alerts to be vital for ensuring safety at sea.

Requirements relating to interoperability should be incorporated in resolution A.1001(25) to give the users of mobile satellite services in the GMDSS confidence that the selection of a particular provider will have no effect on their ability to receive MSI or obtain assistance in the event of a distress at sea.

Consequently, ICS recommends support for formal inclusion of guidance on interoperability in resolution A.1001(25).

14/7 Comment on the report on the assessment of Inmarsat FleetBroadband Maritime Safety Data Service for recognition and use in the GMDSS

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom proposes that IMO documents use the name "Fleet Safety" for the FleetBroadband Maritime Safety Data Service.

The Sub-Committee is invited to recognize this service through a resolution based on the guidance in the Criteria for the provision of mobile satellite communication systems in the GMDSS (resolution A.1001(25)).

14/8 Comments on the report on the assessment of the remaining requirements identified in furtherance of IMSO's assessment of the application for recognition and use of the Iridium mobile satellite system in the GMDSS

United States

The United States comments on document NCSR 5/14/2. It proposes that the IMO and other international organizations with actions recommended for completion before IMSO issues its “Letter of Compliance” (NCSR 5/14/2 paragraph 10) do so without delay.

It is proposed that the next steps should be:

Advise MSC 99 that the Iridium mobile satellite system meets the criteria for provision of mobile satellite services as provided by the Organization in resolution A.1001(25), and so should be recognized as a GMDSS mobile satellite service provider; and

Recommend the text of a draft resolution, entitled "Statement of Recognition of Maritime Mobile Satellite Services provided by Iridium Communications Inc.", for consideration at MSC 99.

It is noteworthy that the United States does not address the additional recommendations made by IMSO in document NCSR 5/14/2. In particular the proposal for a trial period relating to the broadcast of MSI prior to the issuance of the IMO “Letter of Compliance”. This suggests that the United States does not consider such a trial period necessary but it could well be an opportunity to demonstrate the interoperability solutions that are planned to be implemented.

The assessment in italics above may be considered as an ICS comment to further reinforce the need for a robust solution for interoperability should it be required.

ITEM 15: REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR EPIRBS OPERATING ON 406 MHZ TO INCLUDE COSPAS-SARSAT MEOSAR AND SECOND GENERATION BEACONS

The Sub-Committee will consider the relevant parts of the report of the twenty-fourth meeting of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group (NCSR 5/17) and any other proposals that may be submitted under this agenda item.


Papers:

15 Proposal to update resolution A.810(19) United States

The United States provides information on the work done to prepare amendments to resolution A.810(19) to:

Incorporate the Cospas-Sarsat Programme's deployment of the Medium-Earth Orbit Search and Rescue (MEOSAR) satellite service anticipated to achieve full operating capability in approximately 2020;

Include references for Cospas-Sarsat second generation 406 MHz beacons; Include an Automatic Identification System (AIS) locating signal; and Update out of date references.

Due to additional inputs and the unanticipated delays in interested member States operational tests an extension of the completion date to 2019 is requested.

ICS remains supportive of the incorporation of AIS into EPIRB, subject to the conclusions of operational tests, given the potential benefits for the indication and location of persons in distress. It is therefore recommended that an extension of the completion date to 2019 is supported.

15/1 EPIRB-AIS Dual ID Matching Japan

Japan provides information on the method to match the two IDs assigned to an EPIRB-AIS (the EPIRB ID and the AIS ID) during SAR activities.

The method proposed to resolve this issue is to substitute "EPIRB ACTIVE" in an AIS message 14 transmitted by the EPIRB which includes the EPIRB 15 Hex ID.

15/2 Consequential updates to other documents United States

The United States discusses the potential consequential changes to other related IMO, ITU, and IEC documents to ensure alignment and consistency with the updated EPIRB performance standards in the revised resolution A.810(19).

15/3 Comments on the proposed update to resolution A.810(19)

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom proposes additional amendments to the draft update of resolution A.810(19), as set out in the annex to document NCSR 5/15 (United States).

Taking into account the comments and views of the ICAO/IMO JWG (report provided in document NCSR 5/17), it is proposed that the revised resolution A.810(19):

Includes a definition of the position update rate, taking into account the update rate required to maintain 30m accuracy in 3 knots of tide, and a position refresh of not more than 5 minutes;

That the Return Link Service (RLS) capability be incorporated in the performance standard. This is the MEOSAR system capability to provide a casualty with an indication that the distress message has been received;

The provision of an RLS indicator; and Require the use of ISO standard symbols and IMO agreed symbols for operational

indicators.

ICS considers that the proposed amendments to the revised performance standard presented by the United Kingdom in NCSR 5/15/3 are valuable contributions in enhancing confidence in the function of EPIRB in distress situations. It is recommended that all of the proposals by the United Kingdom are supported.

ITEM 16: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROVISION OF GLOBAL MARITIME SAR SERVICES


1. Relevant parts of the report of the twenty-fourth session of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group (NCSR 5/17) and any other documents that may be submitted under this agenda item; and

2. Matters related to the further development of the Global SAR Plan for the provision of maritime SAR services.


Papers:

16/INF.9 Pacific Search and Rescue (PACSAR) regional update & the outcomes of the 7th Pacific regional search and rescue workshop

New Zealand

New Zealand provides:

Information on how the South West Pacific Island Nations are approaching search and rescue;

A regional update; and The outcomes of the recent workshop held to develop and promote collective

search and rescue governance, coordination, response and preventative work in the Pacific.

16/INF.17 Libyan Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre Project

Italy

Italy provides information on the Libyan Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (LMRCC) Project. This is an initiative run by the Italian Coast Guard and funded by the European Commission. The aim is to conduct a feasibility study for the establishment of a Libyan MRCC. This would enable Libyan authorities to identify and declare their Search and Rescue Region.

ITEM 17: GUIDELINES ON HARMONIZED AERONAUTICAL AND MARITIME SEARCH AND RESCUE PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SAR TRAINING MATTERS


1. The relevant parts of the report of the twenty-fourth session of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group (NCSR 5/17); and


Target completion date: 2019

Papers:

17 Report of the twenty-fourth meeting of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group on Harmonization of Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides the report of the twenty-fourth meeting of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group on the Harmonization of Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue. Relevant outcomes relating to agenda items at this session include:

Agenda item 11 - Revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV for Modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), including related and consequential amendments to other existing instruments

The JWG will consider and comment on the first draft of the revision of SOLAS chapters III and IV at its next meeting.

Agenda item 15 - Revised Performance Standards for EPIRBs operating on 406 MHz (resolution A.810(19)) to include Cospas-Sarsat MEOSAR and second generation beacons

The JWG noted that NCSR 4 had encouraged Member States to undertake more operational tests of the proposed revised duty cycle for the 121.5 MHz signal, and share the results with the JWG.

No information had been received on this matter for consideration at the meeting. Tests in several countries are to take place in the near future. It was noted that the results of those tests should be awaited before taking further action.

Agenda item 18 - Amendments to the IAMSAR Manual

The JWG agreed the proposed amendments to IAMSAR Volume I, II and III for subsequent approval by MSC 99 and consequential inclusion in the 2019 edition.

The amendments to IAMSAR Manual Volume III includes reference to the ICS guidance on Large scale rescue operations at sea: Guidance on ensuring the safety and security of seafarers and rescued persons.

17/1 SAR aircraft flight management system (FMS) concerns

United States

The United States discusses concerns with flight management systems (FMS) used on aircraft not complying completely with IAMSAR Manual principles and agreed terminology.

17/INF.22 Informe sobre la XIXª Patrulla Antártica Naval Combinada 2016-2017

Argentina and Chile

En el presente documento se presentan las actividades desarrolladas por la XIXª Patrulla Antártica Naval Combinada, realizada por los Estados que suscriben,con el fin de incrementar la seguridad marítima y la protección del medio ambiente en el Continente Antártico.

This information paper is not available in English.

ITEM 18: AMENDMENTS TO THE IAMSAR MANUAL


1. The relevant parts of the report of the twenty-fourth session of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group (NCSR 5/17); and


Amendments to the 2019 version of the Manual should be approved by the Maritime Safety Committee in 2018.


Papers:

No papers have been submitted under this agenda item. Refer to agenda item 17.

ITEM 19: UNIFIED INTERPRETATION OF PROVISIONS OF IMO SAFETY, SECURITY, AND ENVIRONMENT-RELATED CONVENTIONS


1. Relevant unified interpretations submitted by Member States and international organizations; and

2. Any comments thereon, with a view to developing relevant IMO interpretations, as appropriate.


Papers:

No papers have been submitted under this agenda item.

ITEM 22: ANY OTHER BUSINESS

The Sub-Committee will consider any other matters submitted by Member States or international organizations or referred to it by the Committees or other Sub-Committees.

Papers:

22 Updates of electronic chart display and information systems Outcome of III 4

Secretariat

The Secretariat provides information on the work undertaken by III 4 to address the issue of non-compliant ECDIS using outdated editions of specifications from the port State control (PSC) perspective.

The Sub-Committee is invited to consider the matter of required updates of ECDIS in general and to advise III 5 on the date of revocation of III.2/Circ.2 (III 4/15, paragraph 15.3).

Member States and relevant international organizations are invited to provide relevant technical and/or statistical information on the maturity of the existing ECDIS update.

ICS provides comments on document NCSR 5/22 in document NCSR 5/22/11.

Refer to SDC 5/22/11.

22/1 Update of the IMO e-navigation Strategy Implementation Plan

Australia and Norway

Australia and Norway make proposals to update the IMO e-navigation Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP).

The co-sponsors propose that the provisions in the SIP for update and review are used by the Sub-Committee to consider and prioritise the remaining work needed to deliver e-Navigation. It is considered that this would enable member States and interested international organizations to prepare proposals for new outputs for consideration at MSC 99, MSC 100 and MSC 101.

ICS thanks Australia and Norway for the submission and agrees that progress made on e-Navigation related solutions should be taken into account in prioritising future work identified in the SIP.

However, whilst recalling the substantial body of work undertaken on standards and guidelines relating to e-navigation both at IMO and other international organizations in response to the prioritised solutions, international shipping has yet to see any step change in the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine information on board ships, or the anticipated enhancements to navigation and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment.

In this regard, any review of the SIP should also consider whether the approach to implementing the e-Navigation Strategy is delivering on the intent agreed at MSC 85 in 2008.

ICS recommends that before considering and prioritising further phases of work, it would be appropriate to consider the effectiveness of what has already been achieved. Our approach is to first question whether the implementation the e-Navigation Strategy actually sets us on the right path towards real enhancements in safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment.

22/2 Comments on document NCSR 5/22 Updates of electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS) – Outcome of III 4

CIRM

CIRM provides comments on document NCSR 5/22 with respect to ECDIS maintenance requirements in general and the maturity of the existing ECDIS update. The submission provides information relating to:

ECDIS maintenance requirements in general; Maintaining ECDIS to comply with IHO S-52 Presentation Library 4.0; and Availability of ECDIS updates and the actions taken by CIRM in response to

concerns raised by industry.

The submission by CIRM highlights, in particular, the complexity associated with ECDIS updates and how they may be approached, including demonstrating that the updates have been applied in accordance with the requirements of the Administration.

ICS thanks CIRM for the submission and for their cooperation in the lead up to the 1 September 2017 deadline for completion of ECDIS updates.

The submission provides a valuable summary of the issues surrounding ECDIS update, which do warrant further consideration.

In relation to paragraph 6, ICS questions whether a procedure exists for the Sub-Committee to review whether a particular “substantive change which would result in a change of symbolization” constitutes a safety critical and cost-effective upgrade which Administrations should require. This information could be provided in the relevant report on monitoring ECDIS issues by the IHO under this agenda item.

More generally, the experience of some companies and equipment manufacturers demonstrates the need to separate the deadline for expiry of the previous edition of an IHO ECDIS standard from the date from which manufacturers should be required to implement that standard.

In appreciating that safety critical updates should not be unduly delayed and that timings will need to reflect the complexity of particular updates, fixed implementation schedules may not be appropriate. However when endorsing any implementation schedule proposed by IHO, the Sub-Committee could consider agreeing to:

1. A date for compliance with updated IHO standards by manufacturers; and2. A separate date for compliance by Companies (and the expiry of the existing

standard). Evidence suggests that the dates should be separated by a period of not less than 1 year.

In our view, ECDIS is the first but not the last navigation related carriage requirement that will require software changes to be carefully managed. However, it is important to ensure that those with the obligation to comply - the Company - are given sufficient time to do so following the publication of a new edition of a standard.

22/3 Progress on standards development by the IEC IEC

IEC provides information on progress made in standards development.

22/4 Industry standard on software maintenance of shipboard equipment

BIMCO and CIRM

BIMCO and CIRM provide information on an industry standard recently published to address Software Maintenance of Shipboard Equipment. The aim of the industry standard is to improve the quality of software maintenance on board ships. All stakeholders are encouraged to use the standard.

This work is valuable although BIMCO and CIRM have overstated its status. Whilst it would not be difficult to achieve, there is not yet industry consensus on this approach. ICS would have a preference for this standard being an IMO requirement rather than an ISO standard as proposed in the submission.

ICS thanks BIMCO and CIRM for this valuable contribution to software maintenance. Whilst the approach is not yet an industry standard endorsed by all stakeholders, it is reported to have demonstrated that it is needed and is effective. ICS therefore recommends that the Sub-Committee encourages its wider use.

22/5 Report on monitoring of ECDIS issues by the IHO IHO

IHO provides the outcome of the continuing monitoring by the IHO of ECDIS issues related to the implementation of the carriage requirements in SOLAS regulations V/19.2.10 and V/19.2.11. The information provided relates to:

The status of IHO ECDIS-related standards and consequential amendments to revision on MSC.1/Circ.1503/Rev.1;

Maintenance of IHO standards for ECDIS; and ENC coverage.

22/6 Updates of electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS) - Comments on Outcome of III 4

IHO

IHO provides comment on the outcome of the work undertaken by III 4 to address the issue of non-compliant ECDIS. IHO reports that:

Only one comment was received reporting problems with the Edition 4.0 of the ECDIS Presentation Library. This has been identified as a portrayal issue with a particular system;

There have been no reports that the concentrated inspection campaign (CIC) conducted by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding member States has identified any deficiencies; and

It is confident that the majority of systems have now been upgraded and therefore

are compliant with the latest IHO ECDIS standards.

It is considered that a review of the III.2/Circ.2 at III 5 would be appropriate. IHO supports the revocation of III.2/Circ.2 following III 5.

22/7 Conduct of search and rescue operations in the maritime areas appertaining to the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine

Ukraine

Ukraine expresses views regarding the conduct of search and rescue operations in areas of the Black Sea.

22/8 New information sources to support implementation of the Polar Code marine mammal avoidance provisions

FOEI, WWFand CSC

The co-sponsors provide information on several new sources of information on Polar marine mammal habitat, migration routes, and one method of assisting mariner voyage planning. The purpose is to assist in the implementation of the marine mammal avoidance provisions of chapter 11 of the new Polar Code. The following sources of information are highlighted:

The Ecological Atlas of the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort Seas; Mariner's Guide for the Hudson Strait; and Russian Arctic Science Centre.

It is noted that the focus appears to be on proposing new sources of information separate from nautical charts and publications (as defined in SOLAS regulation V/2.2). It does not appear that the co-sponsors appreciate that the most effective means of achieving their objective is to encourage the incorporation of this information into official nautical publications.

22/9 Report on the installation of aids to navigation on the Antarctic Continent

Argentine Republic

Argentina provides information on the plan for installing automatic identification system aids to navigation (AIS AtoN) on the Antarctic Continent. The AIS AtoN are primarily used for marking virtual cardinal and isolated danger marks in the vicinity Carlini Base and Deception Base.

22/10 Status of the output on Additional modules to the Revised Performance Standards for Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) (resolution MSC.252(83) relating to the harmonization of bridge design and display of information

Secretariat

The Secretariat recalls the outcome of NCSR 4 and the proposal to delete the output on Additional modules to the Revised Performance Standards for Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) (resolution MSC.252(83).

It is further recalled that the decision of NCSR 4 was not endorsed by MSC 98. Instead the work on additional modules for resolution MSC.252(83) was postponed until

completion of Guidelines for the harmonized display of navigation information received via communications equipment (agenda item 6). This is due in 2018.

However, taking into account the developments reported under agenda item 6 and the consequential delays the Sub-Committee is invited to re-iterate to the Committee the proposal to end work on additional modules for resolution MSC.252(83). Furthermore, the Sub-Committee is invited to carefully consider the prioritization of e-Navigation related outputs and limit the number that are included in the provision agenda for the Sub-Committee.

Taking into account the delays relating to agenda item 6, the proposal of the Secretariat is reasonable and ICS should not object to deletion of the output on Additional modules for resolution MSC.252(83).

22/11 Comments on document NCSR 5/22 ICS

ICS is pleased to introduce document NCSR 5/22/11 responding to the request for statistical information on the maturity of ECDIS software updates in document NCSR 5/22 and making a recommendation on the date of revocation of III.2/Circ.2.

Paragraph 4 of the submission provides self-explanatory statistical information from a sample of ICS Members.

Based on the information in paragraph 4, paragraph 5 recommends that the date of revocation of III.2/Circ.2 should not be before 1 July 2018. This recommendation would ensure that those ships which continue to experience difficulties in obtaining the necessary updates are not disadvantaged by the revocation of III.2/Circ.2.

The Sub-Committee is invited to consider the statistical information provided and the subsequent recommendation based thereon.

22/12 Comments on document NCSR 5/22/7 Russian Federation

The Russian Federation comments on document NCSR 5/22/7 (Ukraine).

22/INF.2 Use of the addressed short safety-related message capability of AIS – results of a trial

Australia

Australia provides a report on the outcomes of a trial conducted by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA). The trial evaluated the effectiveness of the addressed short safety-related message capability of AIS.

22/INF.4 Baltic/Barents Sea Regional Co-operation on matters relating to NCSR - Report of the 24th meeting

Germany

Germany provides information on the 24th meeting of the Baltic/Barents Sea Regional Co-operation (BBRC) on matters relating to NCSR.

22/INF.7 Development status and plan of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

China

China provides information on the operational performance, development status and plan of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS).

22/INF.10 Questionnaire survey on the usabilities of navigational instruments for masters and deck officers

Japan

Japan provides the result on the questionnaire survey on the usability of navigational instruments for masters and deck officers. It is considered that the results could contribute to the improvement of usability of such instruments and enhancements to safety of navigation.

22/INF.11 The result of the Coast Guard Global Summit Japan

Japan reports the result of the Coast Guard Global Summit, a new platform of dialogue and cooperation, held in Tokyo on 14 September 2017.

22/INF.12 Report on the activities of the Amver programme United States

The United States provides the Automated Merchant Vessel Reporting (AMVER) annual report and performance metrics for the 2016 calendar year.

22/INF.16 Report on the 14th Black Sea Conference on Maritime Search and Rescue

Ukraine

Ukraine provides the outcome of the 14th Black Sea Conference on Maritime Search and Rescue (Black Sea SAR Conference), which was held in Odessa, Ukraine, on 20 and 21 September 2017.

22/INF.18 Results of the ICS pilotage, towage and mooring survey 2016

ICS

ICS provides the results of a pilotage, towage and mooring survey conducted by ICS between 16 September 2016 and 16 November 2016.

22/INF.20 Background biological information for the Polar Code marine mammal avoidance provisions

FOEI, WWFand CSC

The co-sponsors provide broad biological information relevant to implementation of the Polar Code marine mammal avoidance provision. Marine mammal species that inhabit the polar regions are identified, and impacts of shipping traffic on particular species are described.

item 1: - uk chamber of shipping … · web viewitem 1: adoption of the ... (fpso) installation....

Documents