item #1€¦ · las vegas monorail company owns the system public benefit corporations provide...
TRANSCRIPT
12/10/2018
1
December 6, 2018
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
Item #1
12/10/2018
2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Item #2
TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK &
AGENDA REVIEW
Item #3
12/10/2018
3
• Learn about Southern Nevada’s mobility
challenges, new developments and opportunities.
• Learn about smart communities, emerging
technologies and how these efforts can impact
and improve mobility, accessibility and safety in
Southern Nevada.
• Obtain input and feedback and make
recommendations on how to best address and
prioritize mobility solutions.
COMMITTEE GOALS
• Meeting 8 – January 31, 2019 – Transit industry update;
LVCVA update
• February to June 2019 – Innovation Day at the
Legislature; Legislative session
• Meeting 9 – June 2019 – Legislative session recap;
TRAC next steps
MEETING FRAMEWORK
12/10/2018
4
Major Project Updates
Resort Corridor Update
Federal Update
Transit Financial Overview
2019 Legislative Agenda
Upcoming Events
AGENDA REVIEW
MAJOR PROJECT UPDATES
Item #4
12/10/2018
5
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
Las Vegas RTC
December 6, 2018
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
Design Overview
12/10/2018
6
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
7
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
8
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
9
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
10
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
11
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
12
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
13
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
14
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
15
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
16
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
Construction Overview
12/10/2018
17
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
Transportation & Parking
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
12/10/2018
18
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
An Urban Rather Than Suburban Model …
© 2018 LV Stadium Events Company, LLC
• 20,000 pedestrians on Hacienda promenade
• Ride Share & Taxi – at conception, not a retrofit
• Hotel limo service
• Dispersal of parking – reduce Stadium congestion
• Onsite Stadium lots operated by StadCo
• Remote Lots operated by StadCo
• Independent business lots organized and coordinated by StadCo
• Park & Ride lots pushed by StadCo
• The plan is not intended to be static – will be intentionally flexible and
change prior to opening and throughout the decades to reflect evolving
consumer behavior and emerging transportation options
• RTC will be fundamental in executing the plan and providing a first-
class day of event experience
12/10/2018
19
C U R T I S L . M Y L E S
P R E S I D E N T & C E O
L A S V E G A S M O N O R A I L
L a s V e g a s
M O N O R A I L
Las Vegas Monorail Company owns
the system
Public benefit corporations provide
services typically provided by
government entities – transit services
Private not-for-profit 501(c)4
No shareholders
12/10/2018
20
T O U R I S M &
M O B I L I T Y
The Monorail system carries tens of thousands daily, but
the biggest mobility impact is during major events.
CES – 165,000
SEMA – 160,000
NAB – 130,000
ConExpo – 130,000
Marathon Weekend – 100,000+ rides
New Year’s Eve – 50,000+ rides
Holiday weekends and special events
S Y S T E M
B E N E F I T S
4 miles long, 7 stations
Capacity – 224 per train, up to 130,000/day
Speed – up to 50 mph, end to end service in 14
minutes
Fully Automated Train Control System
Elevated – preserves roadway capacity while
increasing mobility
Reduces annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) –
2.2m in 2017
Reduces emissions from vehicle trips – 28 tons
in 2017
Carries approx. 5 million riders per year
12/10/2018
21
D E V E L O P M E N T
U P D A T E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• Approx 1.14 miles new guideway
• 1 new station at Mandalay Bay
• Ped access connector between Mandalay
Bay and Luxor hotels
• 1 new station on Sands Avenue
• Ped access connector between MSG Sphere,
Sands Expo (and Venetian/Palazzo), as well
as new Wynn convention facility via
connected bridges
• Upgrade/modifications to Automated Train
Control
MA
ND
AL
AY
BA
YM
ON
OR
AI
LC
ON
NE
CT
IO
N
12/10/2018
22
SA
ND
SE
XP
OM
ON
OR
AI
LC
ON
NE
CT
IO
N
With stations at Mandalay Bay and Sands Expo & Convention
Center, the Monorail will be directly connected to:
42,000 hotel rooms
10M square ft. of convention & meeting space
3 arenas, 1 stadium
Over 600 retail, dining, nightlife & bar, show/concert/event
venues, unique attractions and experiences
C O N V E N T I O N
C O N N E C T I O N
12/10/2018
23
D E V E L O P M E N T
T I M I N G
Completion of:
• Entitlements
• Airport Approvals
• Easement Agreements
= FINANCING
Q U E S T I O N S ?
12/10/2018
24
RESORT CORRIDOR UPDATE
Item #5
RESORT CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY
12/10/2018
25
49
OBJECTIVE: Consider feasibility of a high-capacity
transit system to improve access to, from and
within the Resort Corridor
CRITICAL LINKS:
• Airport to the Strip
• Movement along the Strip
• Strip to downtown Las Vegas
STUDY OVERVIEW
50
How satisfied are you with getting around Las Vegas?
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Stated Preference Survey
43%
51%
3% <1% 2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
VerySatisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory VeryUnsatisfactory
Don't know
12/10/2018
26
51
While in Las Vegas, which types of transportation did you choose?*
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Stated Preference Survey
* Multiple Choices Allowed
11% 11%
50%
33%36%
23%
16%
37%
29%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Public Bus Monorail Rideshare Taxi Personal/RentalCar
Convention Delegates Leisure Visitors
52
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Estimated Daily Resort Corridor Visitor Trips
Projected Daily Trips with both Origin and
Destination within the Resort Corridor
Visitor Volume Daily Visitor Trips
2020 44 M 492,000
2040 56 M 618,000
Change +26% +26%
Airport
Strip East
Center Strip
North
Center Strip
South
Downtown
North Strip
South
Strip
12/10/2018
27
53
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Modes of Travel to/from Airport
Stated Preference Survey
Ride Share34%
Taxi26%
Limo5%
Paid Airport Shuttle
11%
Public Bus4%
Personal Car<1%
Rental Car18%
Other 3%
54
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Modes of Travel along the Strip
Stated Preference Survey
Ride Share17%
Taxi6%
Shuttle / Bus 3%
Monorail4%
Public Bus7%
Personal Car33%
Rental Car16%
Walk12%
Other2%
12/10/2018
28
55
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Modes of Travel between Strip and Downtown
Stated Preference Survey
Ride Share19%
Taxi9%
Public Bus17%
Monorail1%
Personal Car27%
Rental Car24%
Other 3%
56
Transportation Modes Chosen by Respondents
Reference TripMode Chosen
Light Rail Bus Rideshare Taxi Car
All Trips 46% 12% 18% 13% 11%
Between Airport and Resort Corridor
52% 11% 21% 17% 0%
Between Strip and Downtown
37% 13% 14% 9% 26%
Along the Strip 45% 12% 16% 12% 16%
Stated Preference Survey
12/10/2018
29
57
Fare Sensitivity
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12 $13 $14 $15
Daily
Rid
ers
hip
Perc
enta
ge o
f V
isitors
tra
velin
g b
etw
ee
n t
he
Air
port
and t
he S
trip
and D
ow
nto
wn
Fare
Bus
Light Rail
Stated Preference Survey
58
Fare Sensitivity
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12 $13 $14 $15
Daily
Rid
ers
hip
Perc
enta
ge o
f V
isitors
tra
velin
g b
etw
ee
n t
he
Str
ip a
nd D
ow
nto
wn
Fare
Bus
Light Rail
Stated Preference Survey
12/10/2018
30
59
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
Criteria Considered in Reviewing Transit Technologies
• Visitor Experience
• Value
• Constructability / Disruption
• Speed
• Reliability
• Accessibility
• Convenience
• Potential Ridership
• Roadway Capacity in terms of people throughput
60
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
12/10/2018
31
61
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service
(SDX)
62
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
12/10/2018
32
63
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
64
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
12/10/2018
33
65
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
• People Mover
66
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
• People Mover
• Monorail / Elevated Transit
12/10/2018
34
67
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
• People Mover
• Monorail / Elevated Transit
• Light Rail
68
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
• People Mover
• Monorail / Elevated Transit
• Light Rail
• Gondola
12/10/2018
35
69
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Transit Technologies
• Deuce
• Limited Stop Bus Service (SDX)
• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
• Modern Streetcar
• European Tram
• People Mover
• Monorail / Elevated Transit
• Light Rail
• Gondola
70
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Technologies included in Alternatives Analysis
Pros• Operates in mixed flow or exclusive lanes• Deuce popular with visitors• SDX faster, with limited stop service• Frequent stops• Maneuverable in heavy traffic• No construction required
Cons• Lower capacity (88 to 108 passengers)• Slow boarding (Deuce only)• Slowed by street congestion
Pros• Operates in mixed flow or exclusive lanes• Positive visitor response• Operates without wires• Faster boarding • Higher capacity (200 to 220 passengers)
Cons• High capital costs• Requires construction of a track• Slowed by street congestion • Not maneuverable around traffic
Deuce and SDX European Tram
12/10/2018
36
71
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Present Peak Period Capacity:
Existing Deuce and SDX (persons per hour)
4 ½ minute bus frequency
Total 7,100 persons per hour per direction
Automobiles 6,050 persons per hour per direction
Deuce and SDX Bus 1,050 persons per hour per direction
72
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 1: Existing Deuce and SDX
Deuce and
SDX
SDX
Deuce
Deuce
9.5 miles
SDX
11 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
Deuce + SDX
20,300 + 9,900 = 30,200 (2020)
27,200 + 13,200 = 40,400 (2040)
12/10/2018
37
73
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 2: Enhanced Bus (Deuce and Airport SDX)
Deuce and
Airport SDX
Airport SDX
Deuce
Deuce
9.5 miles
Airport SDX
9.1 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
Deuce + Airport SDX
30,200 + 10,200 = 40,400 (2020)
40,400 + 10,700 = 51,100 (2040)
74
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 3: European Tram
European
Tram
European Tram
6.5 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
European Tram
33,000 (2020)
44,300 (2040)
20
12/10/2018
38
75
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 4: European Tram (Strip and Airport)
European
Tram
European Tram
8.2 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
Strip Tram + Airport Tram
33,000 + 18,100 = 51,100 (2020)
44,300 + 21,700 = 66,000 (2040)
76
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 5: European Tram and Airport SDX
European Tram
6.5 miles
Airport SDX
9.1 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
European Tram + Airport SDX
33,000 + 10,200 = 43,200 (2020)
44,300 + 10,700 = 55,000 (2040)
European Tram
Airport SDX
12/10/2018
39
77
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
Alternative 6: Deuce and Airport European Tram
European
Tram
Deuce
Deuce
9.5 miles
Airport European Tram
7 miles
Estimated Total Average Daily Boardings
Deuce + Airport European Tram
30,200 + 18,100 = 48,300 (2020)
40,400 + 21,700 = 62,100 (2040)
78
Comparison of Alternatives
Estimated
Year 2040
Total Daily
Ridership
Estimated Capital
Costs For
Vehicles and
Infrastructure
Estimated
Operating
Costs
Estimated
Farebox
Revenue
Alternative 1 41,900 $101,455,000 $296,972,000 $328,712,000
Alternative 2 54,100 $190,911,000 $363,776,000 $769,890,000
Alternative 3 47,500 $960,554,000 $447,934,000 $373,920,000
Alternative 4 69,200 $1,199,027,000 $589,420,000 $1,169,856,000
Alternative 5 59,700 $1,056,456,000 $612,537,000 $815,086,000
Alternative 6 63,600 $977,556,000 $574,734,000 $1,124,511,000
12/10/2018
40
79
Comparison of Alternatives
Estimated
Year 2040
Total Daily
Ridership
Net Operating
Surplus
(Deficit)
Capital Deficit
Requiring Additional
Revenue Source
Alternative 1 41,900 $31,740,000 ($69,715,000)
Alternative 2 54,100 $406,114,000 $215,203,000
Alternative 3 47,500 ($74,014,000) ($1,034,568,000)
Alternative 4 69,200 $580,436,000 ($618,591,000)
Alternative 5 59,700 $202,549,000 ($853,907,000)
Alternative 6 63,600 $549,777,000 ($427,779,000)
80
Resort Corridor Feasibility Study
RTC• Improve wayfinding / customer experience
• Speed boarding process
− Off board ticketing
− Level boarding
− Reduce pull-outs
Private Properties / Public Rights of Way• Improve guest awareness of transit options
• Longer transit stops for multiple vehicles and/or longer vehicles
• Enlarge and integrate pedestrian waiting areas
• Reduce right-lane conflicts
− Right turn pockets
− Pedestrian grade separations
Transit Stop Improvements
12/10/2018
41
81
Next Steps
• Present draft recommendations to stakeholders – seek consensus
• Incorporate results into overall On Board plan
• Pursue recommendations
Near-term
Long-term
FEDERAL UPDATE
Item #6
12/10/2018
42
Item #9 - Upcoming Events
Consumer Telematics Show 2019Smart Cities: Opportunities or Threat? Building Tech and Partnership for New MobilityAre smart, low-emission cities the end of the automotive or are they an
opportunity for new products, services and business models?
WHEN: Monday, Jan. 7, 2019
4:10 – 4:40 p.m.
WHERE: Planet Hollywood
Item #9 - Upcoming Events
CES Panel: Government vs. OEM Development
How are government and the auto industry working together to make automated vehicles a reality? What about the insurance, legal and
public relations battles of autonomous and automated accidents?
Who’s responsible? How do we prevent fatalities? What needs to
happen and why?
WHEN: Tuesday, Jan. 8
2:15 – 3:15 p.m.
WHERE: Las Vegas Convention Center, North Hall, N262
12/10/2018
43
Item #9 - Upcoming Events
TRAC Meeting #7 | Thursday, Jan. 31 | 2:30 – 5 p.m.
LVCVA Update
Steve Hill
Jacksonville
Transportation AuthorityNat Ford
Capital Metro
Randy Clarke
OPEN DISCUSSION
Item #10
12/10/2018
44
Item #11
FINAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION