itec4610 network switching and routing
DESCRIPTION
ITEC4610 Network Switching and Routing. ดร. ประวิทย์ ชุมชู หัวหน้าสาขาวิชาวิศวกรรมสารสนเทศและการสื่อสาร (ICE) MUT Email: [email protected] ห้องทำงาน : F402 เบอร์โทรศัพท์ที่ทำงาน : (02)9883655 ต่อ 220 เบอร์โทรศัพท์เคลื่อนที่ : 065343850. Class XI MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
ITEC4610Network Switching and Routing
ดร . ประวิ�ทย์ ชุ�มชุ�หั�วิหัน้�าสาขาวิ�ชุาวิ�ศวิกรรมสารสน้เทศและการส��อสาร(ICE)MUTEmail: [email protected]หั�องท�างาน้: F402เบอรโทรศ�พทท#�ท�างาน้: (02)9883655 ต่%อ 220เบอรโทรศ�พทเคล��อน้ท#�: 065343850
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Class XI MPLS (Multiprotocol Label
Switching)
ดร . ประวิ�ทย์ ชุ�มชุ�หั�วิหัน้�าสาขาวิ�ชุาวิ�ศวิกรรมสารสน้เทศและการส��อสาร(ICE)MUTEmail: [email protected]หั�องท�างาน้: F402เบอรโทรศ�พทท#�ท�างาน้: (02)9883655 ต่%อ 220เบอรโทรศ�พทเคล��อน้ท#�: 065343850
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Outlines
MotivationMPLS OverviewMPLS Operation and Components
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
• IPThe first defined and used protocol De facto the only protocol for global internet working
… but there are disadvantages
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
• IP Routing disadvantages:– Connectionless
e.g. no QoS– Each router has to make independent
forwarding decisions based on the IP-address
– Large IP Header At least 20 byte outing in Network Layer
– Slower than Switching
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
• ATM– connection oriented– Supports QoS– fast packet switching with fixed length
packets(cells)– integration of different traffic types
(voice, data,video)
…but there are also disadvantages
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
• ATM disadvantages– Complex– Expensive– Not widely adopted
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
• Traditional Routing and packet switching– A simple-software-based router platform– L2 switching (Hardware) for local
network
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Motivation
Combine the forwarding algorithm usedin ATM with IP.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Outlines
MotivationMPLS OverviewMPLS Operation and Components
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS Overview
IP
ATM, FR, Ethernet, PPP
SDH, ODH,WDM,CSMA
MPLS
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
MPLS is arranged between Layer 2 and Layer 3
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS Functions
• Specified mechanisms to manage traffic flows of various granularities, such as flows between different hardware, machines, or even flow between different applications
• Remains independent of the Layer-2 and Layer-3 Protocols
• Provides a means to map IP addresses to simple, fixed-length labels used by different packet-forwarding and packet-switching technologies
• Interfaces to existing routing protocols such as resource reservation protocol (RSPV) and open shortest path first (OSPF)
• Supports the IP, ATM, and Frame-relay Layer 2 protocols
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS Example
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS Example
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Outlines
MotivationMPLS OverviewMPLS Operation and Components
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS Operation
• Label Creation and Distribution• Table Creation at each router• Label-switched path creation• Label insertion/table lookup• Packet forwarding
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS components
• LSRs (Label Switching Router) & LERs (Label Edge Routers)
• FEC (Forward Equivalence Class)• Label &Label Blinding
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
MPLS components
• LER (Label Edge Router)– Resides at the edge of an MPLS network
and assigns and removes the labels from the packets.
• LSR (Label Switching Router)– Is a high speed router in the core on an
MPLS network.– ATM switches can be used as LSRs without
changing their hardware. Label switching is equivalent to VP/VC switching.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label
• The labels are used to forward the packets on their way ( switching).
• The labels change during transmission.
• Hardware can be used to switch packets quickly between links.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Format
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Details
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Creation
• Topology-based method – Uses normal processing of routing
protocol (such as OSPF and BGP)
• Request-based method – Uses processing of request-based control
traffic (such as RSVP)
• Traffic-based method – Uses The reception of a packet to trigger
the assignment and distribution of a lable
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Distribution
• LDP (Label Distribution Protocol)– Maps unicast destination into labels
• RSVP, CR-LDP– Used for traffic engineering and resource
• PIM (Protocol-Independent multicast (PIM))– Used for multicast states label mapping
• BGP– External Label (VPN)
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label-Switched Path (LSPs)
• Hop-by-hop routing– Each LSR independent selects the next hop for a
given FEC. This methodology is similar to that currently used in IP networks. The LSR uses any a viable routing protocols, such as OSPF, ATM private network-to-network interface (PNNI), etc.
• Explicit routing– Explicit Routing is similar to source routing. The
ingress LSR specifies the list of nodes through which the ER-LSP traverses. The path specified could be nonoptimal, as well.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
LSP Details• MPLS provides two options to set up an
LSP– hop-by-hop routing:– Each LSR independently selects the next hop
for a given FEC. LSRs support any available routing protocols ( OSPF, ATM …).
– explicit routing: Is similar to source routing. The ingress LSR specifies the list of nodes through which the packet traverses.
– The LSP setup for an FEC is unidirectional.– The return traffic must take another LSP!
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
LSP
A path is established before the data transmission starts.
A path is a representation of a FEC. FEC The Forward Equivalence Class is a
representation of a group of packets that share the same requirements for their transport.
The assignment of a particular packet to a particular FEC is done just once (when the packet enters the network).
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Space
• Per Platform– The label values are unique across the whole
LSR. The Label are allocated from a common pool. No two labels distributed on different have the same value.
• Per Interface– The label ranges are associated with interfaces.
Multiple label polls are defined for interface, and the labels provided on those interfaces are allocated from the separate polls. The label values provided on different interfaces could be the same.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Merging
• The incoming Streams of traffic from different interface can be merged together and switched using a common label if they are traversing the network toward the same final destination. This is known as strem merging or aggregation of flows
• If the underlying transport network is an ATM networks, LSRs could employ virtual path (VP) or virtual channel (VC) merging
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Retention
• Conservative– The binding between a label and an FEC received
from LSRs that are not the next hop for a given FEC are discarded. This mode requires an LSR to maintain fewer Lables.
• Liberal– The binding between a label and an FEC received
from LSRs that are not the next hop for a given FEC are retained. This Mode allows for quicker adaptation to topology changes and allows for the switching of traffic to other LSPs in case of changes
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Control
• Independent– An LSR recognizes a particular FEC and makes
the decision to bind a label to the FEC independently to distribute the binding to its peers. The new FECs are recognized whenever new routes become visible to the router
• Ordered– An LSR binds a label to a prticular FEC if and
only if it is the egress router or it has received a label binding fro the FEC from its next hop LSR.
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Signaling Mechanisms
• Label Request– An LSR requests a label from its
downstream neighbor so that it can bind to a specific FEC
• Label Mapping– In response to a label request, a
downstream LSR will send a label to the upstream initiator using the label mapping mechanism
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Distribution Protocol
• Discovery Messages– Announce and maintain the presence of an LSR in a
network
• Session Messages– Establish, maintain and terminate sessions between
LDP peers
• Advertisement Messages– Create, change and delete label mapping for FECs
• Notification Messages– Provide advisory information and signal error
information
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Label Stack
• The label stack mechanism allows for hierarchical operation in the MPLS domain. It basically allows MPLS to be used simultaneously for routing at the fine-grain level
• Each level in a label stack pertains to some hierarchical level. This facilitates a tunneling mode of operation in MPLS
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
CR (Constraint-based routing)
• CR takes into account parameters such as link characterisitcs (bandwidth, delay, etc. ), hop count and QoS
• The LSP that are established could be CR-LSPs, where the constraints could be explicit hops or QSOS requirements
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Advantages of MPLS
Routing takes place only in the LERs (Label Edge Router)
Label switching increases speedProvides Quality of Service It hides the link layer and the differences between different Layer 2 protocols
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
Disadvantages of MPLS
An additional layer is addedThe router has to understand MPLS
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
แบบสอบถามเพ��อการร%างหัล�กส�ต่ร ปร�ญญาโทร สาขา Network
engineering• เร#ย์น้วิ�ชุาอะไรบ�างต่ลอด 2 ป* • อย์ากเร#ย์น้วิ�ชุาหัร�อเน้�+อหัาอะไรเพ��ม• อย์ากใหั�ต่�ดเน้�+อหัาอะไรออก• ล�าด�บวิ�ชุาท#�เร#ย์น้ควิรเปล#�ย์น้หัร�อไม%• ควิรม# Lab อะไรเพ��มหัร�อเปล%า• ควิรป�พ�+น้วิ�ชุาอะไรหัร�อเน้�+อหัาอะไร
Info
rmatio
n a
nd
C
om
munica
tion e
ng
ineerin
g
(ICE)
MUT
โครงสร�างหัล�กส�ต่รใหัม%
Transmission system+Data
Communication (L1->L2)
Computer Network (L3->L7)
Operating System
CCNA1-2
C, C+, Script( perl, bash, etc.)
Network Switching and Routing
Network Management
Project IWireless Networks Network security
Project II
CCNA3-4
Information Technology for
Organization Management
Wireless Network Lab
11
8
10
8
11+8+10+8=37
Telecommunication Networks
Term 1
Term 2
Term 3
Term 4