ITIT’’S NOT HHO!!!S NOT HHO!!!

A quick Introduction to Energy, A quick Introduction to Energy, Energy Sources, Conventional and Energy Sources, Conventional and

Unconventional SourcesUnconventional Sources

What Controllable Energy What Controllable Energy Resources Has Mankind Used for Resources Has Mankind Used for the Last 2000 Years?the Last 2000 Years?•• Years 0 Years 0 –– 1800 Wood, Dung, Coal, and 1800 Wood, Dung, Coal, and

Peat Burning.Peat Burning.•• 18001800--1860, Add Whale Oils1860, Add Whale Oils•• 18601860--1900, Add Petroleum, petroleum by1900, Add Petroleum, petroleum by--

products. products. •• 19001900--1950, Add Natural Gas1950, Add Natural Gas•• 19501950--2013, Add Nuclear (Fission)2013, Add Nuclear (Fission)

Despite Using these 8 Primary Despite Using these 8 Primary Sources, Most People Have A Poor Sources, Most People Have A Poor Grasp of Quantity! Grasp of Quantity! •• What is the basic unit of Energy?What is the basic unit of Energy?-- Answer: In Metric, the Answer: In Metric, the ““ErgErg””. Does that . Does that

help you?help you?-- In the In the DorkeyDorkey Old English system, the Old English system, the

British Thermal Unit which is the energy to British Thermal Unit which is the energy to raise one pound of water, 1 degree F in raise one pound of water, 1 degree F in temperature. How about that?temperature. How about that?

LETLET’’S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME ““ENERGY FRAMINGENERGY FRAMING”” USING THE BRITISH USING THE BRITISH

THERMAL UNITTHERMAL UNIT

•• Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Wood:Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Wood:

About 8000 BTU in that pound. Need to About 8000 BTU in that pound. Need to burn 10 of them to heat the house per burn 10 of them to heat the house per hourhour……..

LETLET’’S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME ““ENERGY FRAMINGENERGY FRAMING”” USING THE BRITISH USING THE BRITISH

THERMAL UNITTHERMAL UNIT

•• Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Coal:Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Coal:

About 14000 BTU in that pound. Need to About 14000 BTU in that pound. Need to burn 8 pounds to heat the house per burn 8 pounds to heat the house per hourhour……..

LETLET’’S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME ““ENERGY FRAMINGENERGY FRAMING”” USING THE BRITISH USING THE BRITISH

THERMAL UNITTHERMAL UNIT

•• Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Gasoline:Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Gasoline:

Divide by 6 !Divide by 6 !

About 22000 BTU in that pound. Need to About 22000 BTU in that pound. Need to burn 5 pounds to heat the house per burn 5 pounds to heat the house per hourhour…….or, 2 gallons per hour in your V.or, 2 gallons per hour in your V--6 6 to run the car for an hour (So how many to run the car for an hour (So how many BTUBTU’’ss?)?)

LETLET’’S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME S SEE IF WE CAN START DOING SOME ““ENERGY FRAMINGENERGY FRAMING”” USING THE BRITISH USING THE BRITISH

THERMAL UNITTHERMAL UNIT

•• Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Uranium:Take a look at this: 1 Pound of Uranium:

About 1,000,000 About 1,000,000 lbmlbm of Coal in that of Coal in that lbmlbm of of Uranium. Or ? BTU? Great, Except HOT!Uranium. Or ? BTU? Great, Except HOT!

•• One Source Not Mentioned Yet: FusionOne Source Not Mentioned Yet: Fusion

•• Above: Princeton Above: Princeton TokamakTokamak $1 Billion, and$1 Billion, andLess than 1 watt Fusions for 5 MW Input. BummerLess than 1 watt Fusions for 5 MW Input. Bummer

•• Some comments about Some comments about ““Hot FusionHot Fusion””..-- The power source which never has been, The power source which never has been,

is not, and never shall be!is not, and never shall be!-- Why? It probably is NOT the power source Why? It probably is NOT the power source

of the Sun!of the Sun!-- Copies of BOOKLET to hand out. Copies of BOOKLET to hand out. -- Discuss Proton21Discuss Proton21’’s work.s work.

PROTON 21 Kiev Ukraine, Early PROTON 21 Kiev Ukraine, Early 20002000’’ss•• What Happens with a 200,000 Volt, 500,000 Amp What Happens with a 200,000 Volt, 500,000 Amp

discharge in a vacuum chamber, lasting 5 discharge in a vacuum chamber, lasting 5 NanoNanoSeconds:Seconds:

•• Pure Cu produces all the elements of the Periodic Table!Pure Cu produces all the elements of the Periodic Table!

PROTON 21 Kiev Ukraine, Early PROTON 21 Kiev Ukraine, Early 20002000’’ss

•• Mass Numbers: Very OddMass Numbers: Very Odd……indeed..indeed..

•• Super Heavy Man Super Heavy Man -------- Nuclei that is!Nuclei that is!

•• HOW DOES THIS CONNECT???HOW DOES THIS CONNECT???

--Cosmology: It isnCosmology: It isn’’t nuclear Fusion!t nuclear Fusion!--ItIt’’s Super Heavy Nucleis Super Heavy Nuclei--Thus Fusion, is NOT, has not been, and Thus Fusion, is NOT, has not been, and

Never Will be!Never Will be!--But: Something Else MIGHT But: Something Else MIGHT –– Go Back to Go Back to

1989, anyone remember?1989, anyone remember?

TWO TWO ““ODD DUCKSODD DUCKS”” FROM UTAHFROM UTAH

Threw the Science WorldThrew the Science WorldInto A tizzy!Into A tizzy!

•• OPENED UP A OPENED UP A ““CAN OF WORMSCAN OF WORMS”…”…

•• DEAD GRAD STUDENTS, MORE OUTPUT POWER THAN DEAD GRAD STUDENTS, MORE OUTPUT POWER THAN THE TOKAMAK, NO NEUTRONS, IMPOSSIBLE BY LAWS THE TOKAMAK, NO NEUTRONS, IMPOSSIBLE BY LAWS OF PHYSICS, BAD CHEMISTS! BAD, BAD, BAAAAAD OF PHYSICS, BAD CHEMISTS! BAD, BAD, BAAAAAD CHEMISTS THE HOITY TOIT PHYSICS PEOPLE CHEMISTS THE HOITY TOIT PHYSICS PEOPLE BLEATED!BLEATED!

•• WHAT, if NOT FUSION, is REALLY GOING WHAT, if NOT FUSION, is REALLY GOING ON?ON?

-- Enter Even Crazier TheoryEnter Even Crazier Theory……John FisherJohn Fisher““Poly NeutronsPoly Neutrons””..

http://wikibin.org/articles/polyneutron.htmlhttp://wikibin.org/articles/polyneutron.html

Crazy Theory, Nutty Old Man (NOM for Crazy Theory, Nutty Old Man (NOM for short) Dr. short) Dr. OrianiOriani ignored for 6 or 7 years!ignored for 6 or 7 years!

THE EXPLOSION!THE EXPLOSION!

•• BUT BUT –– AFTER SIX YEARS OF QUARTERLY AFTER SIX YEARS OF QUARTERLY CALLSCALLS……DR. ORIAN SAID TO DR. FISHER:DR. ORIAN SAID TO DR. FISHER:

•• ““John, how the hell would I know that John, how the hell would I know that these things exist? How could I detect these things exist? How could I detect them?them?”” The Answer: CRThe Answer: CR--39 !!!39 !!!

ALPHA PARTICLES: HIGH ENERGY ALPHA PARTICLES: HIGH ENERGY He4 FROM THORIUM, URANIUM He4 FROM THORIUM, URANIUM AND RADON!AND RADON!•• Radon Track Etch KitRadon Track Etch Kit

•• On the right, typical traces on the CROn the right, typical traces on the CR--39 About 4 39 About 4 to 6 for 2 to 6 for 2 picopico curies per liter of air, normal MNcuries per liter of air, normal MN

ORIANIORIANI’’S STUNNING RESULTS!S STUNNING RESULTS!

•• YouYou’’ve got copies ofve got copies of--

•• And here is the first And here is the first ““large burstlarge burst”” found: found:

IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES: IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES: RADON/THORIUM/URANIUM RADON/THORIUM/URANIUM ALPHAS AND THIS BURST ALPHAS AND THIS BURST ------•• Alphas coming from a nucleus DONAlphas coming from a nucleus DON’’T T

CARE about direction!!CARE about direction!!

HOWEVER DR. ORIANIHOWEVER DR. ORIANI’’S ALPHAS S ALPHAS DO CARE, AND HAVE DIRECTIONDO CARE, AND HAVE DIRECTION

•• As shown by this polarized light analysisAs shown by this polarized light analysis

•• They pointed to a source, 1.8 cm away from the They pointed to a source, 1.8 cm away from the CRCR--39 Can we do the math? Use 250 traces39 Can we do the math? Use 250 traces……

WHAT NUMBER DID YOU GET?WHAT NUMBER DID YOU GET?

•• Is it Close to 50,000? GOOD!Is it Close to 50,000? GOOD!

•• But where does 250,000 come from?But where does 250,000 come from?

•• Answer at certain angles the CRAnswer at certain angles the CR--39 is not 39 is not sensitive. sensitive. OrianiOriani estimates itestimates it’’s about a 5:1 s about a 5:1 sensitivity factor. THATsensitivity factor. THAT’’S A STUNNING RESULT. S A STUNNING RESULT. How does this all FIT IN? And why isnHow does this all FIT IN? And why isn’’t it HHO?t it HHO?

NOW WE MUST GET INTO THE NOW WE MUST GET INTO THE ENRGY BALANCE REALM AGAIN ENRGY BALANCE REALM AGAIN AND TALK REAL NUMBERS FOR AND TALK REAL NUMBERS FOR REAL DEVICES: I.E. AUTOMOBILESREAL DEVICES: I.E. AUTOMOBILES•• What sort of energy use does an average automobile involve? Can What sort of energy use does an average automobile involve? Can

we say 2 gallons per hour, 60 MPH, 30 MPG?we say 2 gallons per hour, 60 MPH, 30 MPG?•• At 22,000 BTU per At 22,000 BTU per lbmlbm of gas, thatof gas, that’’s 6 *2 *22,000 =224,000 BTU s 6 *2 *22,000 =224,000 BTU

per hour. Since a KW = 3413 BTU/Hr, this is 77 KW of energy, letper hour. Since a KW = 3413 BTU/Hr, this is 77 KW of energy, let’’s s SAY 77,000 WATTS of energySAY 77,000 WATTS of energy

•• One of your HHO Units does 19 AMPS at 12 Volts. SO on a straightOne of your HHO Units does 19 AMPS at 12 Volts. SO on a straightH2 O2 basis, this is 240 watts of H2 and O2, right? How about thH2 O2 basis, this is 240 watts of H2 and O2, right? How about the e real electrolysis voltage, about 2.5 Volts? That times 19 amps yreal electrolysis voltage, about 2.5 Volts? That times 19 amps yields ields 60 watts.60 watts.

•• LetLet’’s say we GOT IT FOR FREE (not true), what would it add to the s say we GOT IT FOR FREE (not true), what would it add to the output of the engine: 60/77,000 or 0.1% more output.output of the engine: 60/77,000 or 0.1% more output.

•• So whence the 30% mileage gain? So whence the 30% mileage gain?

NEED TO DISCUSS THE OTTO NEED TO DISCUSS THE OTTO CYCLE ENGINE!CYCLE ENGINE!

yyCalculated, Analyzed, Taught, Calculated, Analyzed, Taught, Discussed, Thermodynamic Cycles Discussed, Thermodynamic Cycles in the World!in the World!•• And no matter which way you cut it, it And no matter which way you cut it, it

gives a max efficiency of 47% for gives a max efficiency of 47% for conversion to mechanical energy from the conversion to mechanical energy from the BURN.BURN.

•• What is the REAL efficiency of the What is the REAL efficiency of the standard auto engine? About 23% Why? standard auto engine? About 23% Why? Friction losses, inFriction losses, in--ability to preability to pre--compress compress the air, etc. These are all well studied. the air, etc. These are all well studied.

HOW DOES THE H2 O2 ADDITION HOW DOES THE H2 O2 ADDITION COMPARE WITH THE FLOW COMPARE WITH THE FLOW THROUGH THE ENGINE?THROUGH THE ENGINE?•• We have We have ““hand wavinghand waving”” allegations, that the HHO, results in allegations, that the HHO, results in ““better better

combustioncombustion””..

•• Consider this: A standard fuel injected engine has an almost ideConsider this: A standard fuel injected engine has an almost idea a AIR/FUEL mixture. AIR/FUEL mixture.

•• The combustion is to pure CO2 and H2O.The combustion is to pure CO2 and H2O.

•• The input air at 60 MPH is about 5 The input air at 60 MPH is about 5 lbmlbm of air per minute. THIS of air per minute. THIS TRANSLATES to about 75 cubic feet of air per minute. This means TRANSLATES to about 75 cubic feet of air per minute. This means 75 *28 = 2100 liters per minute. THUS 2 liters per minute of H2 75 *28 = 2100 liters per minute. THUS 2 liters per minute of H2 and and O2 is a .1% volumetric change.O2 is a .1% volumetric change.

WHY WOULDNWHY WOULDN’’T THE EXTRA O2 T THE EXTRA O2 AND H2 MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE?AND H2 MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE?

•• Answer: Because if it did, in the quantities Answer: Because if it did, in the quantities involved, weinvolved, we’’d see our mileage varying all over d see our mileage varying all over the place because of the place because of ––

1.1. Changes in density altitudeChanges in density altitude2.2. Changes in OCTANE.Changes in OCTANE.

Look at this website: Look at this website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,2,4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,2,4--TrimethylpentaneTrimethylpentane

CHANGE IN OCTANE IS CHANGE IN OCTANE IS ACCOMPLISHED BY ADDING A ACCOMPLISHED BY ADDING A ORGANIC FUEL WHICH IS ORGANIC FUEL WHICH IS HYDROGENATED!HYDROGENATED!•• The amount of hydrogen added, to change, say from 80 Octane to The amount of hydrogen added, to change, say from 80 Octane to

100, would DWARF the amount of hydrogen added by the HHO unit.100, would DWARF the amount of hydrogen added by the HHO unit.•• HereHere’’s Air Density in TEXAS summer day:s Air Density in TEXAS summer day:

AIR DENSITY MINNESOTA!AIR DENSITY MINNESOTA!•• --10 F, 10% RH, 900 FT10 F, 10% RH, 900 FT

•• LetLet’’s see: .0849/.0690 = 0.23, or a 23% increase in N2 s see: .0849/.0690 = 0.23, or a 23% increase in N2 and O2 flowing in. More than 0.1%and O2 flowing in. More than 0.1%

WHERE DOES THIS LEAD US?WHERE DOES THIS LEAD US?

•• Remember the Start? ITRemember the Start? IT’’S NOT HHO!!!S NOT HHO!!!

HHO is a HHO is a ““mythical creaturemythical creature””. A beast which some people THINK exists. . A beast which some people THINK exists. (There are unicorns and (There are unicorns and YetteYette to chase too in the world.)to chase too in the world.)

OrianiOriani, however, has pointed us towards another , however, has pointed us towards another ““heuristic conclusionheuristic conclusion””, , i.e. there is SOMETHING UNKNOWN produced in electrolysis i.e. there is SOMETHING UNKNOWN produced in electrolysis devices. It appears to be produced more pronouncedly in devices. It appears to be produced more pronouncedly in ““multi multi plate devicesplate devices””..

When this When this ““mysteriousmysterious”” substance is added to a standard substance is added to a standard ““combustion combustion plasmaplasma”” (according to the definition of a plasma, standard (according to the definition of a plasma, standard combustion IS a plasma) it would seem enough of these Alpha combustion IS a plasma) it would seem enough of these Alpha Bursts occur to add a significant amount to the combustion energBursts occur to add a significant amount to the combustion energy.y.