is.7906.1.1997

Upload: paragbhole

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    1/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    2/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    3/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    4/37

    HELICAL COMPRESSION SPRINGS.i cPART 1. DESIGN AND CALCULATldNS FOR SPRINQS MADE FROM CIRCULAR

    SECTClQN WIRE AND-BAl%,,( Fi rst Revisiofl

    ICS 29.160

    July 1997 = ,. Price Group 11

    ( Reaffirmed 2003 )

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    5/37

    Springs Sectional Committee, LM 17

    , c .

    F. REWORD9 .This Indian Standard (First Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards after the draftfinalized by the Springs Sectional Committee had been approved by the Light Mechanical EngineeringDivision Council. IThis standard was originally published in 1976. This first revision incorporates a number of changes whichwere felt necessary as a result of further experience gained in the manufacture and use of compressionspring and due to other development in this field.The.main modifications are:

    a)b)

    a The values relating to permissible shear stresses at solid length condition have been altered.h) Values for the relaxation of cold coiled and hot coiled springs have been included.0 The creep and fatigue strength diagrams for cold coiled springs have been amended.

    The symbols have been harmonized with the internationally used symbols as per latest standardsrelating to springs.The contents have been re-arranged in order to distinguish the relationship between individualspring parameters more clearly. The design principles, the types of stresses and permissible stresseshave now been dealtwithin separate clauses.Parameters E, G and E have been included or amended.The values of minimum space, Sa, have been altered.The formulae relating to the increase in coil diameter, A De, and to natural frequency,fe havebeen altered.The data relating to the transverse stability have been complemented by being expressed informulae.

    This standard is one of a series of standards on helical coiled compression springs. Other standards areas follows:IS 7906 (Part 2) : 1975

    IS 7906 (Part 3) : 1975IS 7906 (Part 4) : 1987

    IS 7906 (Part 5) : 1989

    IS 7906 (Part 6) : 1976

    IS 7906 (Part 7) : 1989S,7906 (Part 8) : 1989

    Helical compression springs: Part 2 Specifications for cold coiled springsmade from circular section wire and barHelical compression springs: Part 3 Data sheet for specifications for springsmade from circular section wire and barHelical compression springs: Part 4 Selection of standard cold coiled springsmade from circular section wire and barHelical compression springs: Part 5 Hot coiled springs made from circularsection bars - Specification (first revision)Helical compression springs: Part 6 Design and,calculation for springs madefrom flat bar steelHelical compression springs: Part 7 Quality requirements for cyKndrica1coiled compression springs used mainly as vehicle suspension springsHelical comprqsion springs: Part 8 Method of Inspection of hot coiledcomprFssion.springs.made from circular section bars.,.

    The object of the present standard is to provide an accurate and rapid method of determining the=rKmepsions of heKca1 springs made from circular section wire and bar. It can be used both for calculating .the specification from availabledata and also for checking purposes. Worked examples have been includedto promote understanding of the calculation methods. . *_* (Conti nued on hi rd over)

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    6/37

    IS7906(Partl):l m

    I ndian St andardHELICAL COMPRESSION SPRINGS

    PART d DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS FOR SPRINGS MADE FROMklRClJLAR

    1 SCOPE( Fi rst Rev i si on )

    IS No.(Part 4) : 1975

    SECTION WIRE AND BAR

    1.1 This standard (Part 1) lays down calculationsfor design of helical compression springs madefrom circular section wire and bar.1.2 It applies to cold and hot coiled compressionsprings which have working coils with uniformpitch over the working length, are loaded in thedirection of the spring axis and work at ordinaryroom temperature. For operations at considerablyhigher or lower temperature, reference should bemade to the spring manufacturer.2 REFERENCES

    The following standards contain provisions whichthrough reference in this text, constitute provisionof this standard. At the time of publication, theeditions indicated were valid. All standards. aresubject to revision, and parties to agreements basedon this standard are encouraged to investigate thepossibility of applying the most recent editions ofthe standards indicated below:I S No. Tit le

    3195: 1992 Steel for manufacture of voluteand helical springs (for railwayrolling stock) thi rd evision)

    3431: 1982

    4454(Part 1) : 1981.

    (Part 2) i 1975

    Steel for the manufacture ofvolute, helical and laminatedsprings for automotive suspen-sion (second revision)Steel wire cold formed springsPatented and cold drawn steelwire. - Unalloyed (secondrevision)Oil hardened and temperedspring steel wire and valve spring-_ _.wire - Unalloyed @sl r evi sion) . F+ - ,x*

    7906(Part 2) i 1975

    (Part 3) : 1975

    (Part 5) : 1989

    3 SYMBOLS

    Tit leStainless steel wire for normalcorrosion resistance @strevision)Helical compression springsSpecification for cold coiledsprings made from circular sec-tion wire and barData sheet for specification forsprings made from circular sec-tion wire and barHot coiled springs made from cir-cular section bars - Specification(first revision)

    Following symbols and units shall apply (see Fig. 1):Symbols

    a0

    D

    DeADeDiddMaxE

    (Part 3) : 1975 Oil hardened and tempered.steelwires - Alloyed (first revision) Ft, F2t

    1

    TermsSpace between the activecoils of the unloadedspringDe+Di- = Mean coil9L diameterOutside coil diameterIncrease incoil diameterInside coil diameterWire or rod diameterMaximum diameter ofwireModulus of elasticitySpring force (resilience)Siring forces, correlatedto spring lengths Lr, L2*

    c4

    Unit

    mm

    mmmmmmmm

    N ..N

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    7/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    8/37

    IS7906(Part1):1997SymbolsRR,

    RQS,

    sSl , sz... Sa

    SC

    Sh

    SK

    SQ

    vstWCO

    tA

    5

    VPgz

    q t2.... . . Glrc

    ~kl WZ... . . nn

    ml

    TermsSpring rateMinimum value oftensile strengthTransverse spring rateSum of minimum gapsbetween adjoining activecoils at spring length L ,Spring deflectionSpring deflection corre-lated to spring forces Fi,F2 FnSpring deflection, corre-lated to solid length L cWorking deflection(stroke) of the springSpring deflection corre-lated to the bucklingforce FKSpring deflection corre-lated to the spring forceFQImpact rateSpringing workD- = Spring indexdRQ- = Spring rate ratioRL o- = Slenderness ratioD9L o = Relative spring

    deflectionseating coefficientDensityAccelerationdue to gravityShear stress without theinfluence of the wire cur-vature being taken intoaccountShear stress to the springforcesFx,F2..i..F,,Shear stress correlated tosolid length L cCorrected shear stress,taking the influence ofthe wire curvature bycorrection factor k intoaccountCorrected shear stresscorrelated to the springforcesFt,Fx ,......... FnCorrected stressamplitude correlated toworking travel &

    UnitN/mmN/mm2N/mmmm

    mmmm

    mmmm

    mmmm

    m/sN.mm

    kgJdm3m/s2N/mm2

    N/mm2N/mm2N/mm2

    N/mm2

    N/mm2

    SymbolstkH (. . .) =

    tku (. . .) =

    tko (. . .) =

    ~zul =tst -_

    (. . .) =

    TermsCorrected stressamplitude creep or fatiguestrength value with theindex spec@mg thenumber of load cycles tofracture or the number ofultimate load cyclesCorrected minimumstress, creep or fatiguestrength value with theindex specifying thenumber of load cycles tofracture or the number ofultimate load cyclesCorrected maximumstress, creep or fatiguestrength value with theindex specifying thenumber of load cycles tofracture or the number ofultimate load cyclesPermissible shear stressIncrease in shear stress inthe event of impact II ?d-ingIndicates the sLressesrelating to number ofcycles

    UnitN/mm2

    N/mm2

    N/mm2

    N/mm2N/mm2

    4 DESIGN PRINCIPLZSBefore carrying out design calculations, the re-quirements to be met by the spring being designedshould be clearly specified. Specific attentionshould be paid to the following considerations:

    -

    --

    -

    -

    -

    whether the loading, as a function of time, isstatic or dynamic;minimum number of load cycles to fracturein the case of dynamic loading;operating temperature and permissiblerelaxation;effect of transverse loads, impact loads andbuckling;Whether importance to be given to only oneforce associated deflection/loaded height ortwo spring forces and associated deflec-tions/loaded heights or one spring force, theassociated deflection/loaded height andspring rate; andother influences, such as effect of corrosionspace considerations and resonance, etc.

    NOTE-Adequate space should be provided for the springto operate satisfactorily in its intended application.

    3

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    9/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 19975 MODE OF LOADINGBefore any calculations are made, the qpe of loadand stresses the spring will be subjected to, shall beestablished.5.1 Static or Infrequently Varying LoadSpring under static load or infrequently varyingload are:a)b)

    Cl

    all springs which carry only static load;loads variable with time, with negligiblysmall stresses amplitude (guide line: stressamplitude not exceeding 0.1 times thefatigue strength amplitude); andloads variablewith time,with higher stressesamplitude than above, but with number ofload cycles not exceeding 10 000.

    5.2 Dynamic Loads5.2.1 Loads variable with time, with number ofcycles exceeding lo4 and with the stress amplitudeexceeding 0.1 times the fatigue strength of strokeat:

    a) constant stress amplitude, andb) variable stress amplitude.

    shall be deemed to be dynamic stresses.5.2.2 Compressive springs subjected to dynamicloads and made of spring steel may be divided intotwo groups.

    a)

    b)

    Group 1 - Springs with virtually infinitelife without failure. These springs shallwithstand N not less than 10 in the case ofcold coiled springs, and N not less than2 x lo6 in the case of hot coiled springs.In this case, the stress amplitude is less thanthe fatigue stroke strength.Group 2- Springs with finite, life. Suchsprings may settle due to fatigue or breakwith N less than lo7 in the case of coidcoiled springs,and N less than 2 x lo6 inthe case of hot coiled springs.

    In this case, the stress amplitude ismore than thefatigue stroke strength.In such cases, life can be estimated only byconduct-ing endurance test/life cycle test on-a number ofsprings of same design, dimensions and material.5.3 Transverse LoadsIf an axially loaded helical compression spring issubjected to transverse loads (in a direction per-pendicular to its axis) then localized stresses willoccur in the spring. The effect of the combinedstresses (axial and transverse) shall be taken intoaccount during calculation.

    NOTE - It is not advisable to load a helical compressionsspring transverse to its axis.

    5.4 Thermal LandsThe data relating to permissible stresses given inthis standard is valid only, if the spring operatesbetween -30C and 120C

    For springs operating below -30C the reductionin notch impact strength shall be taken intoaccount. Similarly for springs operating at above120C reduction in &Ale strength shall beaccounted.5.5 BucklingSometimes axially loaded helical compressionsprings have a tendency to buckle at certainslenderness ratio. Therefore it is necessary tocheck the buckling behaviour of such springs.

    An adequate safety against buckling shallbe al-lowed for in the design of these springs, as it ispractically found that buckling starts sooner thancalculated theoretically, Compression springswhich cannot be designed with an adequate safetyagainst buckling shall be, guided inside a tube orover a spindle. Friction will be the inevitable con-sequence, and damage to the spring will ouxr inthe long run.

    It is, therefore, preferable to split up the totaldeflection of a spring into regions of deflection inwhich it is safe in buckling and beyond whichcertain guides may be necessary.5.6 Impact LoadsIncreased shear stresses will be generated in a heli-cal compression spring if one end of the spring issuddenly accelerated to a high velocity, due toshock or impact. The impact wave will travelthrough the successive coils of the spring and willbe reflected at the other end of the spring.

    The level of this increased stress depends on thevelocity with which the impact is delivered, but-noton the dimensions of the spring dimensions.5.7 Other Influences on Spring Design5.7.1 ResonanceA helical compression spring is prone to naturaloscillations by virtue of the inert mass of its activecoils and of the elasticity of the material. A distinc-tion is to be made between an oscillation of the firstorder (fundamental oscillation) and oscillatioti of

    4

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    10/37

    IS 7906 ( Part 1) : 1997higher orders, so-called harmonic oscillations. Thefrequency of the fundamental oscillation is knownas the fundamental frequency, and the frequenciesof the harmonic oscillations are integral multiplesthereof. While designing springs, care shall betaken to ensure that the frequency of the imposedoscillation (excitation frequency) does not comeinto resonance with one of the natural frequenciesof the spring. In the case of mechanical oscillationthe nature of which is known, for examples throughthe cams resonance may also occur if a harmoniccomponent of the excitation frequencies coincideswith one of the natural frequencies of the spring. Incases of resonance, an appreciable increase in stresswill arise at certain individual points of the spring,called oscillation nodes. The following measuresare recommended to avoid such increases in stressdue to resonance phenomena:

    a)b)

    avoid integral ratios between excitationfrequencies and natural frequencies;select the natural frequency of the first orderof the spring as high as possible; excludereasonance with low harmonics of theexcitation;

    Cld)e)

    use springs with a variable spring rate ;design the cam with a favourable profile(low peak values of the excitation har-monics); andprovide for damping by means of shims.

    5.7.2 Influences of Corrosion Friction and Chafing

    The service life of helical compression springs isadversely affected by corrosion influences, frictionand chafing marks.The service life of dynamically stressed springs inparticular is reduced considerably by the influenceof corrosion. Suitable coating can be applied as aprotection against corrosion. ln the case ofelectroplated protective coatings, the risk ofhydrogen embrittlement shall be borne in mind.Damage to the surface of the spring, in the form offretting corrosion will occur as a result of frictionagainst surrounding components, for examplewhen the spring bulges, and this will also lead to aconsiderable reduction in the service life of dynami-cally stressed springs.6 STRESS CORRECTION FACTOR, k6.1 The distribution of shear stresses in the crosssection of the wire/bar of a helical compressionspring is non-uniform. The highest stress occurs at

    the inner edge of the spring wire/bar cross section,due to the curvature of the wire bar (see Fig. 2).6.2 The maximum stress can be approximatelycalculated with the aid of a stress correction factork , which is a function of the spring index. This factorshall be taken into account in the design of themaximum stress, minimum stress and stressamplitude of dynamically stressed springs. This fac-tor being a function of spring index w can be calcu-lated with the aid of an empirical formula(equation 1) or obtained from Fig. 3.6.3 The stress correction factor can be calculatedby Wahls empirical formula:

    k ~ 40 - 1 ; 0.61540-4 6J . .(l)

    IMAXIMUM MINIMUMSHEAR STRESS SHEAR STRESS

    FIG . 2 DISTRIBUTIONOF SHEAR STRESSESNTHE CROSSSECTIONOF THE WIRE OR ROD

    t 1.5r5 1.4tzE 1.3i;s 1.28: : 1. 1i irn 1. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121311 15

    COIL RATIO 0 -

    FIG. 3 STRESSCORRECTIONFACTOR,K, As AFUNCTIONOF SPRING INDEX, o

    Approximate equation for the relationship be-tween stress correction factor k and spring indexw according to Wahls:k _ 4w - 1 + 0.615-- -40-4 0

    5

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    11/37

    IS 7906 ( Part 1) : 19977 VALUES OF MODULUS OF ELASTICITY, 7.2 Effect of operating temperature on modulus ofSHEAR MODULUS AND DENSITY USED FOR elasticity and shear modulus is shown in Fig. 4THE DESIGN OF STEEL SPRINGS below. This may be considered as a guide.7.1 The values given in the Table 1 are applicablefor ambient temperature conditions.

    Table 1 Values of Modulus of Elasticity, Shear Modulus and DensityMaterial

    Patended and cold drawn sGrades 1,2,3 and 4 to IS 445 ring steel wire - Unalloyed,(Part 1) : 1981

    E GNhlll12 N/mm2206ooo 81500

    Pkg/dm37.85

    $;lha&t$$&r$sspring~ ;~;;$vaa;)$$AlioYed oil hardened and temperedvahrespringwire and springw&e for use under moderate1 elevated temperaturesteeGrade lS, lD, 2s and 2D to IS 4454 rPart 3) : 1975~b$2rolled steel for hot coiled springs (all grades) to IS 3431:y&rolled steel for hot coiled springs (all grades) to IS 3195 :

    200 ooo 79 500 7.852Ooooo 79 500 7.85206ooo 78 500 7.85206ooo 78 500 7.85

    I I I I-foe50 0 so I I I100 150 Oc 2 0OPERATING TEMPERATURE -

    FIG. 4 MODULUS OF ELASTICITY AND SHEARMODULUS AS A FUNCTIONOF THE OPERATINGTEMPERATURE GUIDELINESVALUES AVERAGED FOR THE MATERIALS LISTED IN TABLE 1

    8 COMPUTATIONAL FORMULAE 8.2 Spring Force Resilience)8.1 Work done in deflecting a spring under forceF and associated deflection F G/ s . 3)

    W= 3F.s=s 55. 2)

    6

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    12/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    13/37

    IS 7906 ( Part 1) : 19978.13 Transverse Stability8.13.1 Under the combined effect of coaxial andtransverse load, a spring becomes deformed asillustrated in Fig. 5 below.

    FIG. 5 HELICALCOMPRESSIONPRINGUNDERSIMULTANEOUSXIAL AND TRANSVERSEOADING8.13.2 Assuming that the spring ends do not lift offtheir seatings [see formula (23) for this condition],the following formulae shall be used for calcula-tions.Transverse spring rate:

    FQRQ = -SQ

    . (16)

    Transverse spring deflection :

    RQz-z R whereslenderness ratio, A = %

    FQ &s, = - =RQ 7l.R ..,Spring rate ratio q is given by equationr(17)

    8.13.3 The transverse spring rate, RQ, is only con-stant for short Uansverse spring deflections, for agiven loaded height L It varies with the seatingconditions of the spring ends. In applications wherethe transverse stability of the spring is an importantoperational factor, the calculated values should beverified in actual practice.8.13.4 Maximum shear stress considering thecombined effect of axial and transverse load is :

    TMX4 = --$[F.(D+s~)+F~.(hd)]...(21)

    Maximum corrected shear stress:t kmcs = k m m (22)

    condition for the spring ends resting on their sup-ports:

    1.. (23)8.14 Buckling8.14.1 Helical compression springs have a ten-dency to buckle; the associated spring length isdesignated as buckling length L k and the springdeflection up to the point of buckling as bucklingspring deflection Sk.The influence of the seating of the spring ends isallowed for by means of seating coefficient Y,whichis specified in Fig. 6 for the main types of seatingwhich occur.

    . (18). (19)

    and the relative spring deflection 5 = *.. (20)

    8

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    14/37

    IS7906 Partl):19978.14.2 The following formula is applicable for calculating the buckling spring deflection Sk

    Sk=.,% [l- jm1 . (24)E

    Y=2 Y=l Y=l v= 0 l v=o sFIG. TWESOFSEATINGANDASSOCIATEDSEATINGCOEFFICIENTSOFAXIALLYSTRESSEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGS8.14.3 Safety against buckling is achieved intheory for an imaginary square root value and for3, 1.S8.14.4 Safety against buckling can also be evaluatedwith the aid of the graph shown in Fig. 7.8.15 Impact StressThe increase in shear stress, rst, resulting from animpact can be calculated with the aid of formula(25) :t St = V,,.d2x lo-.p.G . (25)This formula does not take into account the reflec-tion of the impact waves at the spring ends, and theeffect of a possible striking of the coils against oneanother.9 PERMISSIBLE STRESSES9.1 Permissible Shear Stress at Solid Length9.1.1 Cold Coi l ed Compressi on Spri ngsFor manufacturing reasons, it shall be possible tocompress all springs down to their solid length. Thepermissible shear stress at solid length taut, shall be0.56R,. The value of R, (minimum value of tensilestrength) can be obtained from the relevantstandards, for the relevant condition, that is har-dened and tempered or patented condition.9.1.2 Hot Coil ed Compression Sr i ngs.Figure 8 shows the values of the permissible shearstress at solid lengthtQutfor hot coiled springs. Theactual stress shall not exceed the permissible shearstress at solid length, which is a function of the

    strength of the material, and of the wire/bardiameter. This shear stress is without the stresscorrection factor k.9.2 Permissible Shear Stress Under Static 6rInfrequently Varying Load9.2.1 In such cases, the permissible operatingstress is limited by the relaxation which can betolerated, depending on the specific applicationconcerned.

    99w

    419 0 12 3 c 5 6 7 I9

    v-FIG. THEORITICALBUCKLINGLIMITOFHELICXLCOMPREWONSPRINGS

    9

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    15/37

    IS7M)6(Part1):1997

    BAR DIAMETER d,mm-FIG.~ PERMISSIBLESHEARSTRESS~~~IFORHOTCO~LEDHEL;ICALCOMPRESSIONSPRMGS~E

    FROMSTEELCONFORMING ~0IS3431:1982~N~IS3195: 1992

    0 10 20 # 40 SOh60STRESSURATON -FIG.~ COURSEOFREJAXATIONANDOFRELAXATIONVELOCITYOF HELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSASAFUNCTIONOFTIME

    9.2.1.1 Relaxation is a loss of force at constantclamping length, which is dependent on stress,temperature and time, and in this standard it isrepresented in theform of a percentage loss relatedto the initial values. This shall only be verified incases where requirements have been specified withregard to the constancy of the spring force.912.2 The operating stress shall be calculatedwithout consideration of the stress correctionfactor.9.2.3 Figure 9 illustrates the pattern of the relaxa-tion and of the relaxation velocity in principle. Therelaxation values after 48 hours should be regardedas characteristic values, despite the fact that therelaxation is not fully completed at this point intime.

    SHEAR STRtSS T PRlOR O R&XA1lOH---FIG. 0 RELAXATIONAFTER~~HOURSOFHOTCOILEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSMADEFROM STEEL SPECIFIEDINIS~~~~:992

    AND IS 3431:1982 I-IAVINGASTRENGTHDUETOHEATTREATMENTOF~~OON~~,PRESETATAMEUENTTEIvfPERA~,Ask~CXIONOETHEOPERATINGSTRES~ATVARIOUS 'I WEEW?XJ~U10

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    16/37

    9.2.4 Data on relaxation is shown in Fig. 10 for hotcoiled helical compression springs and in Fig. 11 (a)11 (b), 11 (c), 11 (d), 11 (c)and 11 (f) forcoldcoiledhelical compression springs as a function of thestress prior to relaxation, and of the operatingtemperature.

    IS7906 Part1):1997These graphs represent guiding values, and arebased on conventional production methods withseragging at ambient temperature. These valuescan be influenced favourably by using appropriatematerials and by pre-setting at higher temperaturesand improving the heat treatment for strength.

    00SHEAR STRESS c PRIOR TO RELAXATION -.

    FIG.1 (a) ELAXATION-R 48 HOURSOFCOLDCOILEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSMADEFROMGRADE~. 3 AND 4 WIRESPECIFIEDN S4454(PartlTEMPERATURE,ASAFUNCTIONOFSHEARSTRESS PRIORTOR :1981 PRESETATAMBIENTELAXATIONATVARIOUSTEMPERATURES,INT,ANDFORTHEFOLLOWINGDIAMETERS FNON-SHOT-PEENEDWIRE:WIREDIAMETER: mm, TENSILESTRENGTH:~~~ON/~~,WIREDIAMETER:~~~,TENSILESTRENGTH: 970 N/mmETER:~~~ TENSILESTRENGTH:640N/mm2

    11OO 11 1 1too 400 600 DO0 lOO0 N/mR 1400SHEAR STRESS t . PRIOR TO RELAXATION-

    FIG. 11 b) RELAXATIONAFTER~~HOURSOFCOLDCOILEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSMADEFROMGRADEVWWIRE (VALVE SPRING IRE)ANDFROMSWGRADEWIRE(SPRINGWIRE)SPECIFIEDINIS~~S~(P~~~):1975 PRESETATAMBIENTTEMPERATLJRE,ASAFUNCTIONOFSHEARSTRESS PRIORTORELAXATIONATVARIOUSTEMPERAT~RES,IN~C,ANDFORTHEFOLLOWINGDIAMETERSOFNON-SHOT-PEENEDWIRE:WIREDIAMETER: ~~,TENsIL.ES ~RENGTH:725N/mm2WIREDIAMETER:~~~, IYENSILESTRENGTH:560 N/mm211

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    17/37

    IS 906 Part 1) : 199715%I131211l o

    0 200 400 600 800 IO00 N/mm 1400SHEAR STRtSS z PRIOR TO REIAXATION -

    SHEAR STRESS Z PRIOR TO RELAXA TION-

    12

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    18/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    19/37

    IS7906(Partl):l9979.3 Permissible Stress Under Dynamic Loading9.3.1 In case of dynamically loaded springs, thepermissible amplitude of stress is limited by therequired number of load cycles and by the given rodor wire diameter.9.3.2 Stress correction factor shall be taken intoconsideration in the calculation. Stress amplitudeTkh as illustrated in Fig. 12 is the difference betweenTk1 nd rk2.9.3.3 For a given value of ~1 = ttu, TU shall notexceed TKQ hat is stress amplitude ~b for thedesired working stroke of the compression springshall not exceed the value of the creep or fatiguestroke strength 7~ which can be obtained fromFigures 13 to 24. In the case of dynamically stressedhelical compression springs, the solid length stresszCzUlhall also be verified taking into account thepossibility that additional stresses may be super-imposed as a result of natural oscillations of thespring body.All dynamically stressed springs should be shot-peened. Shot-peening is feasible, as a general rule,

    in respect of helical compression springs with a wirediameter, d, exceeding < 1 mm, a spring index, o,of less than 15 and space between adjoining coils,a,, greater than d.9.3.4 The values given in the following strengthdiagrams are not applicable to springs operatingunder the influence of corrosion or friction.10 EXAMPLES OF SPRING DESIGNCALCULATIONS10.1 Example of spring design calculation ofcompression spring subjected to static or infre-quently varying load are given in Annex A.10.2 Examples of spring design calculation of acompression spring subjected to dynamic load isgiven in Annex B.11 DESIGN OF VARIABLE RATE SPRINGSVariable rat; springs often improve the workingcharacteristics of an assembly. There are twomethods outlined in 11.1 and 11.2.

    SPRING FORCE F TIME t

    s2ORS c

    Ckl=ZkU1 LOAD

    FIG. 2 OSCILLATIONDIAGRAMOFAHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSUBJECTEDTO OSCILLATINGSTRESS

    14

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    20/37

    IS7906 Part1):1997

    MINIMUM STRESS fkurro5~ -

    FIG. 13 CREEP STRENGTHDIAGRAM (GOODMAN DIAGRAM) FOR HOT COILED HELICALCOMPRESSION PRINGSMADE FROM HIGH GRADE STEEL SPECIFIEDIN IS 3195 : 1992/IS 3431: 1982WITH GROUND OR BRIGHTTURNED SURFACE,SHOT-PEENED

    106

    FIG. 14 FATIGUE STRENGTHDIAGRAM (GOODMAN DIAGRAM) FOR HOT COILED HELICALCOMPRESSION PRINGYMADE FROM HIGH GRADE STEELSPECIFIED N IS 3195 : 1992/H 3431: 1982WITH GROUND OR BRIGHTTURNED SURFACE,SHOT-PEENED15

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    21/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 1997

    5E?

    400

    200

    0

    MINIMUM STRESS f id IlO61 -F1c.15 REEPSTRENGTHDIAGRAM(GOODMANDIAGR~)FORCOLDCOILEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSMADEFROMGRADE~AND~PATENTEDDRAWNSPRINGSTEELWIRE

    SPECIFIEDN S~~~~(P~~~~):~~~~SHOT-PEENED

    16

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    22/37

    Pal

    Fco IG.MI: 16RES.

    800 N/mm2 O-_.CREEPSTRENGTHDIAGRAM(GOODMANDIAGRAM)FORCOLDCOILEDHELIC~~IONSPRINGSMADEFROMQUENCHEDAND TEMPEREDSPRTNGWIRESPECIFIEDINIS~~~~(P~O~):~~~~SHOT-PEENED

    17

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    23/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    24/37

    Nlmm2

    FIG.CON

    0

    0IIPRESSION18 FATIGUESTRENGTHIAGRAM GOODMANDIAGRAM)FORCOLDCOILEDHELICALSPR~NGS.MADEFROMG RADE ~AND~PATENTEDDRAWNSPRINGQ~~~ 'I7SPECIFIEDINIS~~~~ Part ). ~ nT--r --.--L~ICCI_JRE- -- I YOU IYUISHOT-P~ENED

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    25/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 1997

    F-. .*-- 1 ,_-rWMBER 0; ULTIMATELOAD CYCLES, N a. . -

    0 200 - Loo 600 800 N mm2 1000MPWUM STRESS fku oq -

    FIG.~~ FATIGLJESTRENGTHDIAGRAM(GOODMANDIAGRAM)FOR COLDCOILEDHELICALCOMPRESSIONSPRINGSADEFROMQUENCHEDANDTE~~PEREDSPRING WIRE~PECIFIEDINIS4454(Part2):1975HOT-PEENED

    COMPRESSIONSPIUNGSMADEFROMQUENCHED ND TEMPEREDSPRINGWIRESPECIFIE~INFIG.0 FATIGUE STRENGMDIAGRAM(GOODMANDIAGRAM)FORCOLDCOILEDHELICAC

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    26/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    27/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    28/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    29/37

    IS7906(Part1):19 +7LOAD F

    PITC

    FIG. 25 VARIABLEPITCH SPRING11.2.1All the other formulae given in this stand-ard shall apply.12 NOMOGRAMS :FOR PRELIMINARYDESIGN CALCULATIONNomograms as shown in Fig. 26 and 27 for helicalsprings embody the wire or bar diameter d, theshear stress t , the load F and the mean coildiameter D in the relationship given by Equation(6). The two nomograms are an aid to be used inpreliminary design calculations see examples givenin 12.2. It is not possible to make an exact calcu-lation of spring data with their aid.

    12.1 Nomogram as shown in Fig. 26 is intended forthe preliminary calculation of the smaller sizes ofspring and nomogram as shown in Fig. 27 for thepreliminary calculation of the larger sizes.12.2 The two inner scales for F and D and the twoouter scales for t and d are always used together inpairs. Each pair of scales is joined by a straight line.The straight line through F and D and the straightline through t and d must intersect the pivot line inthe same point.

    ample 1 (see Fig. 26)Given load F = 1850 N, mean coil diameterD=60mmFind wire diameter d and shear stress tJoin the point for F = 1850 with the point for lineon the point of intersection of the first line with thepivot line. The second line gives the shear stress Tfor various values of d. The result obtained for d= 8 mm is r = 570 N/mm2.Example 2 (see Fig. 27)Given load F = 31 800 N, mean coil diameter,D = 130 mm and z = 700 N/mm2.Find wire or bar diameter d.The straight line joining the point for F = 31800 Nwith the point for D = 130 mm intersects the pivotline in a point through which a second straight lineis drawn with one end passing through the point fort = 700 N/mm2 The point of intersection of thisstraight line with the d scale. gives d = 25 mm.

    24

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    30/37

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    31/37

    IS7906( art 1) : 1997T F

    N/mm N10000090000800007000060000

    1000900800700600500

    300

    5000040000

    - 6000

    200

    f

    100

    100 1

    D dmm mm

    50454035

    ,30

    -25

    FIG. 7 NOMOGRAM FORPRELIMINARYDESIGNCALCULATIONSOFLARGESIZESPR~GS

    26

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    32/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 1997ANNEX AClause 10.1)

    EXAMPLES OF DESIGN OF COMPRESSION SPRINGS SUBJECTED TO A STATIC ORINFREQUENTLY VARYING LOAD

    A-l DESIGN OF A COLD COILEDCOMPRESSION SPRING SUBJECTED TO ASTATIC OR INFREQUENTLY VARYING LOADA compression spring is required for a load Fn = 1850 N and a deflection Sn = 90 mm. The mountingspace has an inside diameter of 72 mm. There areno special requirements to be met by the spring.It is thus necessary to determine the requisitespring data, that is d, n, Lo, z and the springmaterial.A-l.1 Wire Diameter, d

    From Equation (9)d=d= &KX

    Jt.T it . TzulIn Equation (9) t has to be replaced by the permis-sible shear stress zzul the values of which can betaken from 9 or the nomogram (see 12) as follows:Using the nomogram as shown in Fig. 26 draw astraight line joining the specified load Fn = 1850N and the diameter D = 60 mm which is assumedto be in agreement with the space available. Thisline cuts the pivot line at a point which serves aspivot for a second straight line. By rotating thissecond line, coordinate values of the shear stress tand the diameter d can ne found. Diameter d = 8mm, for example, yields T = 570 N/mm2.According to 9, spring steel wire of Grade2,IS 4454 (Part 1) : 1981 with tzul = 620 N/mm2 issuitable.

    Hence d = = 7.7 mmIn fact the next larger wire diameter according toIS 4454 (Part 1) : 1975, namelyd = 8 mm is selected.A-l.2 Number of Aktive Coils, nFrom Equation (10) :

    Gd4.sn=8D3.F

    Taking G = 81 500 N/mm2 the following result isobtained:

    n=Fxgp&)=9.4Which is rounded off to 9.5 so that n = 9.5.Owing to the increase bf 12 = 9.5, Fn is reducedinversely proportional to 1830 N.

    A-l.3 Total Number of CoilsAccording to IS 7906 Part 2) : 1975:

    nt = n+2 = 9:5 + 2 = 11.5nt = 11.5A-l.4 Sum Se of Minimum Spaces BetweenIndividual Working CoilsFrom 8.9

    W= 5 = T = 7.5

    Putting the values in Equation 13(a),& = 13.3 nimWhich is rounded to 14 so that SI = 14 mm.A-l.5 Solid Length, LcFrom IS 7906 (Part 2) : .1975, the solid length of aspring with ground ends is:

    Lc=nt X dMa= 11.5 x 8.06 = 92.7 mmA-l.6 Length Ln Under Load

    Ln =L,+&=92.7+ 14 = [email protected] Unloaded Length LoLo = Ln+ fn= 106.7 + 90 = 1%.7 mm

    A-l.8 Checking the,Shear Stress, tlmFrom Equation (6):

    8.D.F,,th = = 8x(60)x1830x . d3 n x (8)3= 547 N/mm2

    A-l.9 Checking the Shear Stress, TcFrom Equation (6):

    Tc = 8xD.Fcx.dThe theoretical load Fc can be found by tieans ofthe ratio:

    Fc Sc-=-Fn fnPutting SC = fn + & =90+14= 104inm,gives

    Hencetc = 8 60 ;1< 15 k 631 Nlrnrn2n x (8)327

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    33/37

    A-1.10 Buckling Resistance (Fig. 7)Relative deflection = Deflections SLength LO

    I

    The value of S to be inserted in this expression isthe one corresponding to the maximum allowableload, namely S,,6 Relative deflection

    S=---- =Lo & = 0.458196 7Degree of slenderness = $ = 60 = 3.28

    Taking Y = 1The point having these two coordinates in Fig. 3 liesbelow curve. The spring is therefore buckle-proof.A-l.11 Summary of Spring DataThe essential spring data sheet be entered in thedata sheet given in IS 7906 (Part 3) : 1975.A-2 DESIGN OF A I-IOT COILEDCOMPRESSION SPRING SUBJECTED TO ASTATIC OR INFREQUENTLY VARYING LOADA compression spring is required for a loadF2 = F,, = 26 500 N at a deflection f2 = ,, = 120mm. The mean coil diameterD is required to be 130mm. The load sustained by the spring alternatesbetween a variable pre-load Fl and the load F2. Thenumber of load cycles PetweenFl and FZ in 24 hoursdoes not exceed 50. The loading involved is there-fore of the infrequently varying type. It is thusnecessary to find the requisite spring data, that is d,n, Lo, T and the spring material.A-2.1 Bar Diameter, dFrom Equation (9):

    d=-i/8F.D= +zz-JCT JG hd

    In Equation (9) the permissible sQear stress T~,,Ifrom Fig. 8 shall be substituted for z. As zzul inFig. 8 pertains to the solid length the theoreticalload Fc shall be substituted for F in Equation (9).Since Fc is not known yet it is assumed to be 20percent greater than F,

    Fc = 1.2 F,,For the time being, the quantity Sa = sum of mini-mum spaces will be left out of account. Not beforethe diameter d and the number of working coils nare known, the exact value of the theoretical loadFc which depends on Sa can be found and used forcalculating the shear stress tc.As a first approximation for the 4ermissible shearstress the value tzul = 750 N/mm may be inserted

    IS 7906 ( Part 1) : 1997in Equation (9). This is an average value for hotcoiled compression springs having bar diametersup to 35 mm and made of Grades 2 and 3 steel toIS 3431 : 1982.

    Hence d = v8x 1.2F,xDJc x ~zul8 x 1.2 x 26 500 x 130= n x 750

    = 24.3In fact, the next larger bar diameter according toIS 3431: 1982 namelyd = 25 mm, is selected. Withthe aid of the nomogram (see 12) the above equa-tion can also be solved without calculation. Forexample, by taking a point on the F scale repre-senting the load F, = 1.2 x 26 500 = 31800 N anddrawing a straight line to the point representing 130mm on the D, scale it is found that a second straightline drawn from the point z = 750 N/mm2 and thepassing through the same point of intersection onthe pivot line yields a diameter d = 25 mm.A-2.2 Number of Working Coils, IIFrom Equation (10):

    n_ G.d4.S28. Q3 F2

    Taking G = 78 500 N/mm2 (according to Table 1)the following result is obtained:

    n = 78 500 x (25)4 x 120 = 8 o58 x (130)3 x 26 500

    which is rounded to n = 8.Generally speaking it is not necessary for the num-ber of working coils to be rounded to greater ac-curacy than l/4 of a coil. In accordancewith IS 7906(Part 5) : 1989 however, the aim should be to makethe total number of coils and in l/2. The resultshould therefore be rounded, where necessary, to afull working coil, since according to IS 7906(Part 5) : 1989 the difference between the totalnumber of coils and the number of working coilsshould be 1.5. When the number of coils is small,this practice of rounding makes a check calculationnecessary.A-2.3 Total Number Of Coils, ntFrom IS 7906 (Part 5) : 1989

    nt = n+ 1.5 = 8 + 1.5 = 9.5A-2.4 Sum Sa of Minimum Spaces BetweenIndividual Working CoilsFrom 8.9

    D 130o = - = ~ = 5.2 andd 25Sa = 20mm

    28

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    34/37

    IS 7906 ( Part 1) : 1997A-2.5 Solid Length, L c In the event of the shear strtis tc exceeding thet zutvalues permitted by Fig. 8 for Grades 2 and 3steel, the designer shall decide whether Grades 2and 3 is necessary for economic reasons or whetherGrade 1 steel may be specified. In the first case arecalculation is needed in order to lower the shearstress rc in the interest of spring life it is very often

    advisable to specify Grade 1 steel. For hot coiledsprings made of bar having diameters above 40 mmit is recommended that only Grade lsteel shouldbe specified.A-2.9 Buckling Resistance (Fig. 7)

    From IS 7906 (Part 5) : 1989 the solid length ofsprings made from rolled bars is:Lc 5 (ft,-0.3) x&ax

    I (9.5 - 0.3) x 25.35I 233.2 mm

    A-2.6 Load Length, L nL,= L2=Lc+Sa=230+20=250mm

    A-2.7 Unloaded Length, L oL o = L2 + SZ = 250 + 120 = 370 mm

    A-2.8 Checking Shear Stress, tc t = Relative deflection = D~~n~~~L~ From Equation (6): The value of deflection S to be inserted in this

    8.D.Fc expression is the one corresponding to the maxi-= mum allowable load, namely S,,x . d3The theoretical load Fc at solid length L , can bederived from the ratio:

    Relative deflection 5 = 2 = 384 =2 0.312

    Fc S, Degree of slenderness = 2 = g = 2.95-=-F2 f2 Taking Y = 1

    Putting SC = S2 + Sa = 120 + 20 = 140 mm, gives The point of intersection of these two values in Fig. 7F~+ & 26500 x 140 = 31000N lies below-curve. The spring is thus buckle proof.120 A-2.10 Summary of Spring Data

    Hence re = 8 x 130 x 31000 = 657 N/mm2 The data comprising the spring specification shalln x (25)3 be entered in the form according to IS 7906(Part 3) : 1975.This value of shear stress is permitted by Fig. 8.

    ANNEX BClause 10.2)

    EXAMPLE OF DESIGN OF A COLD COILED COMPRESSION SPRINGSUBJECTED TO LOADINGB-l A compression spring is required with virtual-ly infinite life for loads F I = 300 and F2 = Fn =650 N at a stoke S = 14 mm. The mounting spacehas an inside diameter of 37 mm. The load cyclefrequency N = G. H z.It is thus necessary to determine the requisitespring data, that is d, n, Lw Rb and the springmaterialB-l.1 Approximate Determination of tb TV, andTkhThe calculation shall start with the required strokeS and the corresponding stress range zu. The lattershall not be greater than the stress range for fatiguestrength zti of the chosen material. In addition, theshear stress ttishould not be greater than the upperlimit of fatigue strength 7k,,_

    B-1.1.1 The spring concerned is required to havevirtually infinite life which means that the numberof load cycles sustained is not less than 10 million,and therefore oil hardened and tempered valvespring wire Grade VW to IS 4454 (Part 2) : 1975which has been shot peened is selected (see Fig. 19).The following relationship applies (see Fig. 12):Tkl tk2-=-Sl s2

    The deflection SI is obtained from the relationship:Ft F2 -Fl-=-Sl &I

    FI . &St=-= 300x14Fz.Ft 350 = 12mms2 = St+St,=12+14=26mm

    29

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    35/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 1997The value of ru needed for the calculation isobtained from the fatigue strength diagram (seeFig. 19) at rko. Since the wire diameter d is notknown at this stage, it is necessary for the time bein+to insert an estimated figure for TV = 650 N/mm .The relationship between fr and fz stated abovegives

    skl=~~.t~=~x650=3M)N/mm2Hence rkh = tkz - Tkl = 650-300 = 350 N/mm2These stresses range within the limits of Fig. 19.B-1.1.2 wire Di amet er, dFrom Equation (9) :

    In Equation (9) the stress range rkh is substitutedfor rk. Similarly, the corresponding load difference(F2 -Fr) shall be substituted for F. Thz mean coildiameter D is already fixed approximately by thespecified mounting space which has a diameter of37 mm. Taking an estimated figure of 4.5 mm forthe wire diameter and allowing for a variation ofabout 1 mm in this figure, a mean coil diameter ofD = 31 mm can be assumed. An approximate valuefor d can also be found as a function of tk2 with theaid of the nomogram.For the stress correction factor k the provisionalfigure obtained from Fig. 3 by using the estimatedvalues:

    Equation (9) therefore yields the following result:b=454mm*

    The value actually chosen is d = 4.5 mm.B-1.1.3 Number of Worki ng Coil s, nFrom Equation (10):

    G . d4. s2 = S.(D)3.F2

    Taking G = 81500 N/mm2 (according to Table 1)the following result is obtained:n = F x - = 5.95 = 6.0

    B-1.1.4 Total Number of Coil s, ntFrom IS 7906 (Part 2) : 1975 (see 8.8) it is seenthat:

    nt=nt2= 6.0 + 2 = 8.0

    B-1.1.5 Sum Sa of M inimum Spaces Betw eenIndiv i dual Worki ng Coi lsFrom 8.9

    o = 6.9 Sa = 4.32 mmThe value actually chosen iss, = 4.5 mmB-1.1.6 Block Length, LcFrom IS 7906 (Part 2) : 1975 (see 8.10) the blocklength when the spring ends are ground is:

    Lc 5 nt x dM ax 8 x 4.54 = 36.3 mmB-1.1.7 Lengths L2, Li and Lo

    L2 = Ln =_Lc + S, = 36.3 + 4.5 = 40.8mmL1 = L2 + S = 40.8 + 14 = 54.8 mmLo = LI + f l = 54.8 + 12 = 66.8 mm

    B-1.1.8 Checki ng t he Shear St ress, zcFrom Equation (6) :

    8.D.E;,tc = d3The theoretical load Fc at blockderived from the relationship:

    Fe SC-=-Fn S,

    length sC can be

    Putting SC = S, + S, = 26 + 4.5 = 30.5 mmF _ Fn. Scc--= Sh 650 ;63o.5 = 763 N

    Hence tC = 8 x 31 x 763(4*5)3 = 662 N/mm2Figure gives the permissible shear stress asrzUl = 700 N/mm*B-1.1.9 Check i ngt he Shear St resses zkb t uand zuFrom Equation (8) :

    t k = k 8.D.Fd3

    tkl = 1.04 x F1 = 1.04 x 300 = 312 N/mmr~ = 1.04 x F2 = 1.04 x 630 = 676 N/mm2z~b = QZ - Tkl = 676 - 312 = 364 N/mm2

    The above value are permitted by Fig. 19. The firstcalculation performed does not always yield thedesired and permitted results. In such cases thecalculation shall be repeated by starting fromdifferent assumptions.30

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    36/37

    IS7906(PartL):1997B-1.1.10esistance to Buckling (see Fig. 7) wire, Grade VW to IS 4454 (Part 2) : 1975.

    E Relative deflection = Deflection sLength LOThe value of S to be inserted in this expression isthat deflection which corresponds to the maximumload occurring namely SZ

    Relative deflection = 2 = & = 0.38Lo 66.8Degree of slenderness = z = y= 2.15

    Taking Y = 1The point of intersection of these two values inFig. 7 lies below curve. The spring is thus buckle-proof.B-1.1.11ummary of Spri ng Data

    B-2.1 he orresponding shear stresses are Tkl =104 N/mm2 and t~2 = 347 N/mm2. The stress rangerkh = W? -Tkl= 374 - 104 = 243 N/mm2.Figure 19 represents the fatigue strength diagramfor shot peened springs made of hardened andtempered valve spring wire. The calculated stressrange TU = 243 N/mm2 is shown in this diagram.It is seen that maximum possible stress range forfatigue strength is not fully exploited. To determinethe maximum possible stress range for fatiguestrength tm it is first necessary to calculate theratio of the loads Fr and F2. This is found to be:

    Fl-=F2 g = 0.3

    The corresponding 0.3 line is indicated in Fig. 19.Its point of intersection with the interpolated lineThe data comprising the spring specification shall representing the stress range for fatigue strengthbe entered in the form according to IS 7906 for a wire diameter of 4.5 mm gives Zko as 710(Part 3) : 1975. N/mm2. Vertically below this line rku is found to beB-2 RECALCULATION OF A COLD COILED 215 Nmm2*COMPRESSION SPRING TO ALTERNATING From these values the maximum possible stressLOADING range for fatigue strength is calculated as:B-2.0 Given:Compressionspringwithd = 4.5mm, TLH = Tko - Tk,, '710 - 215 = 495 N/mm2.31.0 mm, This check shows that the same conditions (Fl, F 2,

    L, = 74 mm,n = 8.5,nt = 10.5, Ends closed S and D) could be met by using a lighter spring andand ground therefore hence one which is an improvement fromAt Fl = lOON, fl= 6mm, the economic viewpoint. CJalculattcn on the linesAt F2 = 334 N, 2 = 20 mm, of the example in B-I would yield tl*_ following newdata d = 3.5 mm, Lo = 43.25 m, n = 3.13Stroke S = 14 mm. rounded to 3.25, nt = 5.25.Spring shot - peened. The smaller number of coils now obtained wouldMaterial - hardened and tempered valve mean an inadmissibly high shear stress Tc on load-spring ing to the solid length LC f the free length Lo wereto be left unchanged at 74 mm. This is why theshorter length Lo = 43 mm is needed.

    31

  • 8/13/2019 is.7906.1.1997

    37/37

    IS 7906 Part 1) : 1997(Confi nuedffom second cover)The main requirements to be satisfied in the design of helical springs are maximum possible dependabilityand life combined with lowest possible weight and cost. The expenditure of time and effort involved inthe calculation procedure also needs to be reduced as much as possible. Nomograms have been includedat .the end of the standard, which can be used as a rapid method of arriving at provisional figures.In spring calculations, a distinction is made between springs subjected to a static or infrequently varyingload and springs subjected to dynamic loads (see 5).The cross section of the wire or bar of which a helical spring is made, is stressed mainly in torsion. In thecalculations, therefore, the shear stresses likely to occur under load are compared with the permissibleshear stresses. The stressing imposed on the spring, consisting in fact of an overwhelmingly torsionalelement and a negligibly small bending element, is more severe on the inside of the coil than on the outside.This maximum stress is taken into account in the calculation by introducing stress correction factor k .Tests have shown, however, that stress correction factor k can be omitted in calculations concerned withsprings subjected to a static or infrequently varying load.If the shear stresses occurring in the spring remain below the permissible range of stress or below thefatiguestrengthvalues in the case of springs subjected to alternating load, the spring will not fall or becomefatigued within the envisaged life.The permissible shear stresses and fatigue strength for cold and hot coiled springs have been included forspring materials meeting general requirements.In this standard the unit of force used is newton (N) and that for stress is N/mm2.

    1 kgf = 9.806 65 N (exactly)or 1 kgf = 9.81 N (approximately)

    = 10 N (within 2 percent error)1 N/mm2 = 1 MN/m2.

    = 1 MPa [l Pascal] (Pa) = 1N/m2= 0.1 kgf/mm2 (within 2 percent error)

    In the preparation of this standard, considerable assistance has been derived from DIN 2089 Part 1 : 1984Helical compression spring made from round wire or rod, calculation and design, issued by DINDeutsches Institute fiir Normung, Germany.