ipv6 performance bonus?, by eric vyncke [apnic 38 / ipv6 plenary]
DESCRIPTION
IPv6 performance bonus?, by Eric Vyncke. A presentation given at APNIC 38 during the IPv6 Plenary session.TRANSCRIPT
Cisco Public 1© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
IPv6 performance bonus?Eric VYNCKE, Cisco, [email protected] ENGUEHARD, École Polytechnique
September 2014
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 2
Web probe to web servers
HTTP HEAD request
TCPDUMP+
Java
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 3
Web probe to web servers: locations
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 4
Measurement results: global results
Distribution of log( ) for each source-destination pair from our web probe
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 6
Measurement results: HE effect• HE: most important IPv6 backbone provider
• Routeview.org Ashburn’s router BGP table presence of AS6939:44,8% of the IPv6 routes
16,9% of the IPv4 routes
Hurricane Electric’s network map
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 7
Measurement results: HE effect in Singapore
RTT distribution from Singapore to mail.de (in µs)Paths in IPv4 and IPv6 from Singapore to mail.de
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 8
Measurement results: Non-congruent routing• Geographically incoherent routing
Path taken on AS6453 (TATA Comm.) by a TCP connection between our Rackspace server and e-foia.uspto.govDistribution of IPv4 and IPv6 RTTs (in µs) between our server in Virginia and
e-foia.uspto.gov
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Pubic 9
Time to improve BGP routing and peering• BGP peering is not optimal, either in v4 or v6
Lots of Ases are happy enough to peer with only 2 or 3 tier 1 backbone providers
Peering agreements are specific to v6
• Specific ASes’ topology influence routing too muchParticularly in intercontinental connections
Thank you.