ipv6 deployment monitoring survey 2009 based on responses from the apnic community apnic29, 4 march...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009
Based on responses from the APNIC community
APNIC29, 4 March 2010
By Miwa Fujii,
Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC
![Page 2: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Background of IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
• Data
• Findings and Analysis
• Future plan
![Page 3: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
First of all…
• Thank you so much for your participation in this survey during Sept 2009– Survey period = 15/09/2009 – 02/10/2009– Valid APNIC region responses = 429– From 37 economies in the APNIC region
![Page 4: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is this survey?
• RIPE NCC designed this survey in collaboration with TNO and GNKS Consult– Sponsored by European Commission (EC)
– Inspired by the work conducted by ARIN and CAIDA in 2008 in the ARIN region
• APNIC joined this survey– Keen to identify current IPv6 deployment
status through empirical data
• Survey period:– 15/09/2009 – 02/10/2009
![Page 5: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background of the survey
• Original intention of this survey– Inform EC what could be done to ensure a
smooth transition to IPv6• Help EC understand the scope of the problem• Identify the bottlenecks• Propose useful ideas to support the transition
• APNIC agrees about the above principles – APNIC will circulate the outcomes from
relevant organisations
![Page 6: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Objectives of the survey
• To present the comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and projections of IPv6 deployment
• To share the empirical data with wider Internet multi stakeholders in the AP region – To help them to understand current IPv6
deployment status– To help them to clarify issues
• The first step to find constructive solutions
![Page 7: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Data
![Page 8: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Overview of responses
• 429 respondents from 37 economies in the AP region
• 76% of respondents have an APNIC account
• 74% of respondents works for profit organizations
![Page 9: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Economies responded
n=429
![Page 10: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Respondent categories
n=429
![Page 11: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Size of your organisations
n=429
![Page 12: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Size of customer base (ISPs only)
Size Number of respondents (n=218)
Percentage
Up to 1,000 61 28%
1,001 to 10,000 46 21%
100,001 to 100,000 55 25%
100,001 to 500,000 25 11%
500,001 to 1,000,000 9 4%
More than 1,000,000 22 10%
![Page 13: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Usage of IPv6 connectivity (ISPs only)
• What percentage of your customer base using IPv6 connectivity?
Customer base (%) Number of respondents (n=210)
Percentage
0% 129 61%
0% - 0.5% 57 27%
0.5% - 1.0% 16 8%
1.0% - 2.0% 5 2%
More 3 1%
![Page 14: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IPv6 Promotion (ISPs only)
n=214
![Page 15: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
IPv6 address allocations and assignments
Does your organization have, or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment? n=429
![Page 16: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Does your organization have, or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment?
IPv6 address allocations and assignments (only ISPs)
n=192
![Page 17: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
No IPv6 yet (28% of 429):Why not?
n=118
![Page 18: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
No IPv6 yet (28% of 429):Biggest hurdles?
n=118
What do you expect to be the biggest hurdles for your organisation if you were todeploy IPv6?
![Page 19: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72% of 429):
n=311
![Page 20: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72% of 429):Biggest hurdles?
n=311
What are likely to be the biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6?
![Page 21: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72% of 429):Problems in production?
n=311
What are the biggestproblems with IPv6 in production?
![Page 22: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Finding 3
n=311n=118
Assumption vs. reality:Biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6
![Page 23: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72%):Do you have IPv6 presence?
n=311
![Page 24: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72%):What IPv6 setup do you use?
N=289
![Page 25: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72%):IPv6 production services
n=234
![Page 26: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Have IPv6 (72%):Amount of IPv6 traffic
n=201
![Page 27: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Planning IPv6 deployment
![Page 28: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Findings and analysis
![Page 29: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Finding 1
• ISPs in the APNIC region:– Consider promoting IPv6 uptake to their
customers• Yes 52% + Maybe 35% = 87%
– Have or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment
• Yes 71%• No 29%
![Page 30: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
APNIC IPv6 Readiness Survey Conducted in Dec 2008
• Deployed or ready for immediate deployment?
• Formal plan for future deployment?
• Budgeted for future deployment?
30
![Page 31: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Analysis 1
• Majority respondents from ISPs in the APNIC region positively consider promoting IPv6 to their customers – Good news!
• 71% respondents from ISPs in the APNIC region have or are considering getting IPv6 addresses– Good news!– IPv6 Kickstart policy (implemented in Feb
2010) will help such momentum
![Page 32: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Need IPv6 addresses?IPv6 Kickstart policy
![Page 33: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Finding 2
• Why don’t 29% of the total respondents (429) consider having an IPv6 allocation/assignment?• Don’t see business need = 58%• Communication Service Providers doesn’t
support IPv6 = 42%• ISPs doesn’t support IPv6 = 19%
• 62% of the organistaions already have or are considering an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment because:• They want to be ahead of the game
![Page 34: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Analysis 2
• IPv6 is a business continuity issue– Need to reframe your thinking on “don’t see
business need”– IPv6 is a reality– Don’t be left behind!
• To ISPs: if your customers think so, you need to provide more information to educate them
• Service providers, system integrators, and hosting centers– Customers can choose a service provider– Don’t be left behind!
![Page 35: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Finding 3
n=311n=118
Assumption vs. realityWhat are likely to be the biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6?
![Page 36: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Analysis 3
• Attention to gaps:– Deploying IPv6 will be costly?
• “Cost” is relative to organisations so we need to be careful to reach a simple conclusion
• However worth to conduct serious cost benefit analysis now
– You may find “An attempt is sometimes easier than expected”
– Lack of vendor support • Need to raise your voice to vendors now!
– Information security• Need to implement IPv6 in planed manner, not like a
last minute dirty job– “An attempt is sometimes more difficult than expected”
![Page 37: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Finding 4
• What are the biggest problems with IPv6 in production?– Lack of user demand = 50%– Technical problems = 38%– No experience yet = 36%
![Page 38: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Analysis 4
• Lack of user demand could be due to:– Lack of understanding about necessity to
adopt IPv6 by your customers• Enterprises’ IT cycle – it may take one to two
years to implement • They need to start planning now!• Educating your customer is the key
• Technical problems + No experience yet– “An attempt is sometimes more difficult
than expected”– Plan and test!
![Page 39: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Finding 5
Your organisation’s IPv6 setup Nature of your organisation’s IPv6 production services
![Page 40: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Analysis 5
• Obviously, dual-stack is the most adopted methods = 81%
• Native IPv6 = 49%– Good news!
• Tunneled IPv6 (excluding automatic tunneling) = 31%– Consideration points
• Capsulation overhead may have negative impact to IPv6 throughput
• IPv6 traffic may depend on reliability of IPv4 connection
![Page 41: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Finding 6
• Amount of IPv6 traffic– IPv6 traffic is insignificant = 77%– IPv6 traffic is non-negligible but less than
IPv4 traffic = 17%– IPv6 traffic is same as IPv4 traffic = 3%– IPv6 traffic is greater than IPv4 traffic = 3%
![Page 42: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Analysis 6
• IPv6 traffic is emerging – About 20% of respondents see some level
of IPv6 traffic– Encouraging news!
• Traffic comes from edges– Google turned on IPv6 support for YouTube– Sending a spike of IPv6 traffic
• Need to encourage content providers to adopt IPv6
![Page 43: IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032802/56649dea5503460f94ae5815/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Finally…
• 95% indicated their willingness to respond again in 2010– Sometime around June
• We would like to seek your cooperation to measure IPv6 implementation in this region!
• Thank you!