ipsa international conference luxembourg, 18-20 march 2010
DESCRIPTION
CSPP. IPSA International Conference Luxembourg, 18-20 March 2010. REPRESENTATION IN EU EXPLANATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE Director, Centre for the Study of Public Policy Research supported by a 2.5 year British Economic & Social Research Council grant. 2. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IPSA International Conference
Luxembourg, 18-20 March 2010
CSPP
REPRESENTATION IN EU EXPLANATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION
PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE
Director, Centre for the Study of Public Policy
Research supported by a 2.5 year British Economic & Social Research Council grant
A FEW DEFINITIONS
EUROPEAN UNION: Existing EU institutions and its 500 million citizens
GOVERNANCE: Relation of government institutions to citizens
DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATION: Representatives chosen by universal suffrage
and representing a cause which may or may not relate to natural persons
2
MULTIPLE EXPLANATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS
HISTORY (H): Conjunctural agreements codified in institutions and laws result in path dependency. No choice but to accept the legacy of history.
FUNCTIONAL (F): How an institution operates and is effective.
JUSTIFICATIONS (J):
International treaty law
Democratic elections
Technocratic expertise.
Principles: Rule of law. Price stability, etc.
Criteria applicable to six major EU institutions
3
MULTIPLE INSTITUTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION SYSTEM
Q 1. What or who do they represent?
Q 2. How do they relate to each other?
Q 3. What inputs do individuals have as national and EU citizens?
4
EU INSTITUTIONS REPRESENT:
Principles: ECJ, ECB
Corporate interests: ECOSOC, Committee of the Regions
Technik: Supranational Commission staff
States that signed a Treaty: Council of Ministers/ European Council
5
DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMATION THROUGH THE EP?
Critics of policymakers can ask: Who elected you?
European Parliament is elected BUT:
Degressive proportionality. Not one person one vote, one value
Federal representation for an upper chamber without a lower
Most party groups do not have members from all countries
Turnout low and stable --and so is Euro-gap
Multiple populist parties: protest, sincere or both?
6
EU GOVERNANCE: AN ACCOUNTABLE STRATARCHY
Each EU institution part of a co-decision process
Accountable through checks and balances between EU institutions
Stratarchy: Policymaking within a single stratum; shallow vertical ties
None: European Commission. European Court. European Central Bank
Indirect : Council of Ministers. Consultative Committees
Electoral: European Parliament
7
COLLECTIVE ACTION BECOMING MORE IMPORTANT
ISSUES AREAS:
Economy: Fiscal deficits. Growth. Employment. Trade.
Global warming.
National security.
Inter-continental immigration.
EFFECTIVENESS MORE DIFFICULT:
Diverse interests of 27 member states.
EU only one of multiple global actors for each issue.
8
AN UNSTABLE LOW-LEVEL EQUILIBRIUM?
Within the present context:
Principled institutions, ECJ, ECB, have most scope for action BUT no electoral legitimacy
Enlargement + Lisbon equals more checks than balances?
Challenges to the stratarchy from below:
From Loser’s Consent to Loser’s Resentment?
National referendums: the ultimate deterrent to European integration?
9