ippc national phytosanitary capacity development strategy · 2016-01-14 · capa c ity development...
TRANSCRIPT
IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy
Ca
paC
ity
Dev
elo
pmen
t
eNg
022012
Ca
paC
ity
Dev
elo
pmen
t
International Plant Protection ConventionProtecting the world’s plant resources from pests
022012
this paper presents the ippC national phytosanitary capacity development strategy divided by areas, agreed for implementation by the 5th Commission on phytosanitary measures (2010) and the logical framework and work plan endorsed by the Commission in 2012, at Cpm-7. the work presented herein has been prepared and reviewed by contracting parties, regional plant protection organizations, donors, international organizations and phytosanitary experts from seven Fao regions. it also presents an agreed definition of national phytosanitary Capacity.
march 2010, Revised in 2012
IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy
the designations employed and the presentation of material in this
information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of the Food and agriculture organization of the United
nations (Fao) concerning the legal or development status of any country,
territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
of its frontiers or boundaries. the mention of specific companies or
products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented,
does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by Fao in
preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
the views expressed in this information product are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fao.
all rights reserved. Fao encourages the reproduction and dissemination
of material in this information product. non-commercial uses will be
authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other
commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.
applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate Fao copyright
materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be
addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, publishing
policy and Support Branch, office of Knowledge exchange, Research and
extension, Fao, viale delle terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, italy.
© Fao 2012
3
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
Contents
Concept paper on National Phytosanitary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
phytosanitary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Situation analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
logical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
table 1. national phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(summary of strategic areas showing goals) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
table 2. logical Framework for the ippC national phytosanitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Work plan for the IPPC Strategy on Capacity Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13table 3. the ippC Capacity Development Workplan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4
Concept paper on National Phytosanitary Capacity
Introduction the purpose of this paper is to establish a common
understanding of what is meant by national
phytosanitary capacity. this provides the basis
for assessing capacity assets and needs, and for
formulating, implementing and evaluating capacity
development responses.
Phytosanitary Capacity national phytosanitary Capacity is defined as:
“The ability of individuals, organizations and systems of a country to perform functions effectively and sustainably in order to protect plants and plant products from pests and to facilitate trade, in accordance with the IPPC”.
the following concepts expand this definition, which
applies to the national phytosanitary capacity of
contracting and non-contracting parties. + By referring to the individuals, organizations and
systems of a country, it is recognized that national
phytosanitary capacity combines the knowledge
and functions of many entities in a country, not
just nppos. + By referring to systems of a country, it clarifies
that national capacity includes the ability for
individuals and organizations to cooperate and
communicate, both formally and informally.
Such cooperation may be national, regional and
international. + the functions which need to be performed are
technical, legal, administrative, and managerial.
Capacity includes the ability to develop and
apply knowledge, skills and tools appropriate to
these functions. + each country will have its own level of capacity
and it is recognized that phytosanitary capacity
is not static and changes over time.
+ the phytosanitary capacity, current or aspired
to, will be influenced by overarching national
policies and international obligations that may
or may not be directly related to plant health
considerations. + many things contribute to the sustainability of
the performance of functions. these include but
are not limited to:
– an enabling environment in countries
such as policies which allow plant health
activities to evolve and adapt to changing
circumstance; plant health regulations
which empower nppos to function;
visibility and understanding of the ippC
and understanding of the importance of
implementation
– private-public partnerships
– programs for staff retention
– mobilization of resources, including cost
recovery policies
– viable business plan(s) for protecting plant
health and trade
– national commitment to sustain
phytosanitary capacity + the definition for phytosanitary capacity
refers to the ability to protect plants and plant
products from pests. this ability to support
biosecurity also contributes to achieving
other national or international goals under
other initiatives which deal with protecting
biodiversity, food security, and poverty
reduction. + Referring to the ippC in the definition aligns
national phytosanitary capacity with the
Convention.
5
Introductiona strategy is a plan of action designed to work
towards a vision, or a future desired situation ideally
starting from a known current situation or starting
point. a strategy facilitates decision making and
provides a framework for effective action.
Vision statementnppos able to effectively and sustainably service
the needs of their country in the protection of plants
and plant products and the facilitation of trade.
achievement of this vision would result in:
a all contracting parties implementing the
iSpms they need.
b all contracting parties meet their
obligations under the ippC.
c the ippC reflects the goals of all its
members.
d phytosanitary capacity of contracting
parties evolving in response to changing
circumstances
e phytosanitary issues embedded in policy
f effective regional cooperation
Situation analysisan analysis of the current capacity of ippC
member countries to implement the ippC and to
fulfil their obligations as ippC members, provides
the justification and a starting point for the
phytosanitary capacity develoment strategy.
various phytosanitary capacity situation analyses
have been carried out over the past two or three
years for a variety of purposes. the results of
these analyses provide at least a partial situation
description of the current capacity of ippC member
countries and the capacity of the ippC community
overall (encompassing the Cpm, the ippC
Secretariat, the nppos, and the contracting parties)
to develop further capacity among its members.
National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy
+ the independent evaluation of the workings
of the ippC and its institutional arrangements
analyzed the technical assistance activities
of the ippC Secretariat, the decisions and
follow-up of (i)Cpm decisions, and made
recommendations regarding technical
assistance and strengthening phytosanitary
capacity. the evaluation included the
observations that: there have been no
priorities set for capacity building activities
by the ippC Secretariat; staff resources in the
Secretariat were not sufficient to carry out
tCp projects and provide follow up; scarce
Secretariat resources were used for non-core
ippC capacity development activities; there
was little donor involvement in phytosanitary
capacity development projects. the evaluation
recommended that ippC should not be involved
with phytosanitary capacity development
projects, except for core activities such as
training workshops for the implementation
of standards, ippC meeting attendance and
support to the international phytosanitary
portal. the Cpm rejected the recommendation
and decided to develop a phytosanitary
capacity development strategy.
+ the discussion paper prepared by the World
trade organization for the oeWg-BnpC (open
ended working group on building national
phytosanitary capacity which met in 2008) on
building national phytosanitary capacity showed
that plant protection projects are typically last
on the list when it comes to disbursements
related to training. it also noted that the
confidentiality of the results of the phytosanitary
capacity evaluation tool (pCe) limits its
usefulness from the perspective of coordinating
technical cooperation activities.
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
6
+ the evaluation carried out by CaBi of the
pCe showed that the pCe is a valuable tool in
assessing a country’s phytosanitary capacity, but
falls short in several areas and is not always used
as the basis for national development plans.
+ the oeWg-BnpC (2008) noted that:
– there is often poor communication on
the importance of plant protection within
countries; national governments may
set policies and priorities that are not
in line with the objective of preventing
the spread of plant pests; public/private
partnerships are useful and essential to the
sustainability of plant protection programs;
regional approaches work; there is a need
for information of new and emerging plant
pest issues.
– “plant protection” and “plant quarantine”
do not capture attention in the way that
“biosecurity” does.
– other agreements such as the SpS
agreement have a signficant impact on the
work of the ippC.
– the low profile of ippC internationally and
of plant protection programs nationally,
resulting in a perceived non-importance
of plant protection, has resulted in few
available resources and difficulty in acquiring
resources, both for the Secretariat and to
carry out the work programme of the ippC.
+ the oeWg-BnpC (2008) recognized that:
– implementation of standards can be
complex, involving many different areas.
Currently there is a gap between the
development of standards and their
implementation.
– the proposed implementation review
and support system, in particular the
establishment of a help desk for the ippC has
not progressed.
– not all Rppos are equal and activities
suggested to be carried out by Rppos will
not all be carried out to the desired level.
– there are a range of other geopolitical
groupings that are relevant to the ippC.
– the capacity levels of countries are very
different. thus a one-size-fits-all approach
will not work.
– phytosanitary capacity building is going on,
but often the different initiatives are not
well coordinated. there is a need to find out
where the gaps are and prevent duplication.
– the lack of resources are a significant
limiting factor to capacity building.
– the availability of expertise to develop and
deliver capacity building is sometimes a
limiting factor.
+ the oeWg-BnpC (2009), which met in
December 2009, ammended the national
phytosanitary Capacity Building Strategy for
presentation to Cpm-5.
Strategythe strategy describes the components of a global
framework in which stakeholders at national,
regional and international level, each have a role to
play in building the capacity of nppos. the strategy
emphasizes the key role of the nppo. however, it
recognizes that the nppos should be supported by
a number of entities if these national institutions
are to be strengthened. the strategy was initially
divided in 6 strategic areas and for clarity purposes
and after consideration of the work plan in 2012, is
presented divided into the following 8 areas with
the principal stakeholders identified:
7
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
Code Strategic areas Key Stakeholder Secondary Stakeholders
ST1 1. National phytosanitary planning Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership. nppos play the lead role since they are charged to prepare the national phytosanitary action plans.
nppos technical assistance providers (national, regional and international)
ST2 2. Standard setting Under this strategic area, the goal is to improve capacity of contracting parties to participate in ippC standard setting process. the ippC is the lead entity since it has the responsibility to manage the process and help ippC contracting parties to enhance their effective participation.
ippC nppos, Rppos, ReCs etc.
ST3 3. Standards implementation Contracting parties (and non-contracting parties) are able to implement iSpms in line with their needs. this is particularly challenging since nppos have varying national priorities and resource constraints. Understanding their needs and responding to them remains a challenge. the support that nppos receive from their own governments to enhance their capacities also varies greatly, in particular, considering the importance that agriculture has in national policy. the ippC has an important role as a techncial assistance provider, to make available techncial resources to enhance global implementationof the Convention and its standards.
nppos all others and technical assistance providers (national, regional and international)
ST4 4. Coordination and communication Under this strategic area, the goal is to ensure that there is coordinated phytosanitary capacity development addressing priority needs. the ippC plays a central role to ensure that phytosanitary capacity development actions actually address the needs identified by nppos and Rppos, that appropriate linkages are performed with donor organizations and possible opportunities for mentoring and coaching are identified.
ippC nppos, technical assistance providers and all others (national, regional and international)
ST5 5. Pest Information Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance the capability of nppos to provide plant pest information. in some cases, the provision of this information is considered an obligation of ippC contracting parties and in other cases it is intended to call the attention on emerging phytosanitary issues.
ippC nppos, Rppos, ReCs and technical assistance providers etc.
ST6 6. Resource Mobilization (Fundraising) Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance capacity of nppos to mobilize funds to ensure sustainablity of their programmes. the ippC’s own ability to support iSpm development and implementation is of paramount importance under this strategic area. the promotion of the ippC and the national phytosanitary systems considered in the strategic area of advocay, are some of the most important purposes of this strategy, as key tools to mobilize resources.
nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs and donors etc.
ST7 7. Advocacy Under this strategic area, the goal is to improve capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems. nppos have the challenge to promote the importance they play at the national level, particularly where trade, environment and food security are concerned. likewise, the poor record of the ippC to gain international attention of its importance and relevance outside of the Cpm underscores the need for better promotion and communication. the promotion of the ippC and the national phytosanitary systems are some of the most important purposes of this strategy, as key tools to mobilize resources and to clearly establish the role and hierarchy of the Convention.
nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs etc.
ST8 8. Monitoring and evaluation Under this strategic area, the goal is to ensure that phytosanitary capacity development is actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon. there is considerable gaps in the knowledge of the extent of implementation of iSpms and the impact of capacitiy development actions by technical assistance providers globally. many nppos, in particular, lack the tools necessary to document their activities in order to promote appropriate national policies, new regulations and any other actions, since they lack approaches to assess their impacts involving broad ranges of stakeholders.
nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs etc.
8
the strategic areas above can be addressed
individually or in combination with other areas.
Strategic areas 4, 6, 7, and 8 can be considered
cross-cutting and are often referenced in the other
strategic areas.
the result of the implementation of the
strategy is the prospective achievement of the
identified vision, i.e. “nppos able to effectively and
sustainably service the needs of their country in
the protection of plants and plant products and the
facilitation of trade”.
table 1 below summarizes the national
phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy, as
reviewed by the expert Working group on Capacity
Development (eWg CD) for presentation to Cpm-7
in 2012.
Logical Framework the strategy is further elaborated in corresponding
logical frameworks and workplans prepared for
each strategic area identified.
table 2 below shows the logical framefork for the
strategy, divided by area and including the overall
impact/goal and outcome/purpose of each of them.
the table contains the key indicators, means of
verification and risks/assumptions proposed.
all the information contained in the table
is particularly useful for nppos at the time to
elaborate their national phytosanitary action
plans and for donors to get a clear picture of the
expected outcomes in strenghtening national
phytosanitary capacities.
Table 1. National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy (summary of strategic areas showing goals)
Strategic Areas goals Outcome and Purpose Activities
1. national phytosanitary planning
enhanced national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership
• develop methods and tools to help countries assess and prioritize their phytosanitary needs, including gap analysis
• support preparation of national phytosanitary action plans (npaps)
• assist in project preparation to address priorities (legislation, surveillance, etc)
• implement pCe improvements from the CaBi review
• review the oie-pvS (and iiCa phytosanitary pvS tool) and use as basis to develop a new more comprehensive gap analysis process for phytosanitary needs (including stakeholders; peer review step etc.)
• develop tools and guidelines for preparing npaps
• encourage inclusive approaches for preparing npaps
• follow up on assessment with national phytosanitary capacity strategy
2. Standard setting Capacity of contracting parties to participate in IPPC standard setting improved
• enhance countries’ effective participation in Cpm (and in the standard setting process)
• assess participation of countries at Cpm• develop orientation programme for new Cpm
delegates to participate in Cpm (immediately prior to Cpm)
• facilitate regional discussion on Cpm positions (in region or immediately prior to Cpm), and coordination during meetings
• continue regional draft standards workshops• encourage and support participation in expert
working groups, technical panels
3. Standards implementation
Contracting parties (and non-contracting parties) are able to implement ISPMs in line with their needs
• establish and adopt standards implementation review and support system (iRSS)
• develop guidelines/tips for implementation• provide help desk • develop training materials, deliver training,
feedback mechanisms from workshops • develop list of experienced facilitators for
implementing iSpms• develop tools for sharing experiences• regional draft standards workshops• develop and use questionnaire as per
proposal (oeWg on a possible Compliance mechanism at Kuching, 2007)
9
Strategic Areas goals Outcome and Purpose Activities
4. Coordination and communication
Coordinated phytosanitary capacity development are addressing priority needs
• collect, collate and disseminate information on plant protection programmes and existing capacity building providers and projects
• advise countries and donors on possible synergies and opportunities
• collaboration with partners (implementation and supervision agreements, initiatives, etc) – Standards and trade Development Facility (StDF) projects, World Bank missions, Centers of phytosanitary excellence (Cope), etc.
• create mechanism for matchmaking for mentoring, coaching and assistance
• define exactly what information to collect from whom (countries, donors, through linkages, all other partners)
• take advantage of existing databases, projects, oCpm meeting reports
• use linkages to make better programmes (benefit to nppos)
• continue existing agreements• actively seek further opportunities to
collaborate/provide technical input to programmes of others
• engage stakeholders by convening international consultative group on phytosanitary capacity building
• create similar format to the one used by for mentoring SpS inquiry points
5. pest information Capability to provide plant pest information enhanced
• document world plant pest status (emerging issues), including regional perspectives (annual report as an advocacy tool)
• analysis of pest occurrence at national and regional levels, report of pest concerns at Cpm.
• other official reports of the Secretariat or Fao Committee/Council such as State of Food and agriculture (SoFa)
• develop early warning system
6. Resource mobilization (Fundraising)
enhanced capacity to mobilize funds
• determine resource needs for ippC secretariat related to capacity building
• assess current resources available to ippC to deliver capacity building strategy (targeted, trust fund, slush fund, assistance in-kind)
• support nppos in raising funds for priority projects
• obtain further resources and ensure effective use of resources
• maintain and develop ippC capacity building programmes
• prepare paper on staffing requirements for CB for Cpm-4
• raise funds (see resource mobilization paper presented under Cpm-4 agenda item 13.6.6
• hire a dedicated fund raiser• Secretary takes raised profile for fundraising
7. advocacy Improved capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems
• adopt “paris principles” for phytosanitary capacity building activities (national commitment, etc)
• help countries ‘embed’ phytosanitary considerations in policy and national development strategies
• assist phytosanitary authorities to communicate effectively with other institutions within their country, with other countries and with regional organizations
• enhance visibility of ippC (and phytosanitary concerns) among development partners
• encourage adoption of risk-based approaches
• oeWg/sub group to draft principles for effective phytosanitary capacity building for approval by Cpm
• Spta reviews principles• Cpm 5 adopts principles• conduct sensitisation activities for
policy makers• develop training modules for phytosanitary
authorities in effective communication and advocacy
• ippC communication activities (publication, communication products, films, etc)
• access to governing bodies (especially Fao, but also ReCs); Fao and other goodwill ambassadors to reach senior decision makers
8. monitoring and evaluation
Capacity development actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon
• develop approaches for impact assessment for phytosanitary capacity building (in accordance with “paris principles” and regarding ippC strategy)
• monitoring to assess impact of capacity building activities (review and evaluation)
• monitor and continuously improve ippC capacity building programmes
• develop ippC ‘seal of approval’ for capacity building programmes
• ensure involvement of all stakeholders (including creating networks for sustainability, involving universities, public-private partnerships, etc)
• link to other national initiatives• develop, test and adopt criteria for ‘seal
of approval’• promote with donors and countries
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
10
Table 2. Logical Framework for the IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy
Impact/goal Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk
Cooperation between nations in protecting the world’s cultivated and natural plant resources from the spread and introduction of pests of plants, while minimizing interference with the international movement of goods and people
1. Reduction of the absolute number of people suffering from hunger
2. increased food production3. Sustainable management and
utilization of natural resources
global poverty and hunger indices (World Bank, FaoStat, etc.)
global economic crisis continues diverting resources from aid to agricultural productivity in Developing countries
Outcome/Purpose Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk
NPPOs able to effectively and sustainably service the needs of their country in the protection of plants and plant products and the facilitation of trade
1. number of ippC standards implemented per country
2. phytosanitary capacity evolving in response to changing circumstances
3. number of Cps with phytosanitary issues embedded in national phytosanitary policies
1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; nppo reports
2. pCe data; nppo annual reports; Rppo reports; independent evaluation reports
3. policy review reports
global conflicts, natural disasters and compounded effects at the national level by the global economic crisis diverts funds from nppos
Outputs Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk
1. enhanced national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership
1. application of the pCe tool2. national strategies or action
plans approved3. # of Cps with managers trained
in management best practices4. number of emergency pest
response plans develop by Cps
1. pCe data; nppo annual reports; Rppo reports; independent evaluation reports.
2. iRSS data; Rppo reports; nppo reports
the ippC and partners can develop tools, but nppos may not be able or have local support to apply them
2. Capacity of contracting parties to participate in IPPC standard setting improved
1. number of Cps attending Cpm and key ippC meetings
2. level of feedback of Cps after meetings
1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; ReC and other partners’ reports
2. ippC meeting reports; Survey feedback reports
governments do not allocate funding to ensure participation
3. Coordinated phytosanitary capacity development are addressing priority needs
1. number coordinated global, regional and national projects implemented per year
2. number of functional coordination mechanisms reported to be implemented by Cps
3. number of inter-organizational (donors, technical assistance providers, ReCs etc.) meetings held per year addressing phytosanitary issues at global, regional or national level
4. Degree of Cp satisfaction on the assistance provided by the ippC helpdesk
1. iRSS data; ippC and partners’ reports
2. targeted survey feedback reports
3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.
4. ippC helpdesk data.5. ippC projects database and
activities data
partners disregard the need for coordination due to other priorities or policies and continue to implement capacity building resulting in duplicated work and resources
11
Outputs Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk
4. Capability to provide plant pest information enhanced
1. Rate of pest reporting by Cps and Rppos through the ippC portal
2. number of functional diagnostic laboratories at regional or national levels reported by Cps or Rppos
3. Rate of change of number pest specimens hosted in national collections
4. number of pest notifications reported through pest early warning systems
1. ipp data; ippC and partners’ reports
2. targeted survey feedback reports
3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.
nppos refuse to notify pests status for fear of reprisals such as trade prohibitions or restrictions
5. enhanced capacity to mobilize funds
1. number of inter-organizational (donors, technical assistance providers, ReCs etc.) meetings held per year for resource mobilization to address phytosanitary issues at global, regional or national level
2. Degree of change over previous years of budgetary support to ippC
3. Degree of self sustainability of nppos of Cps
4. Degree of change over previous years of budgetary support to nppos
1. iRSS data; ippC and partners’ reports
2. targeted survey feedback reports
3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports
4. ippC projects database and activities data
5. partners’ financial reports
Reduction in aid for agricultural development or redirection of funds to other emerging priorities
6. Improved capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems
1. number of policies and legislation developed, updated or enforced, at regional and national levels, with phytosanitary issues embedded.
2. number of guidelines, documentation, training and other materials addressing advocacy developed and used at global, regional and national levels
3. level of participation and investments in global, regional and national trainings specific to policy makers, senior government officials and private sector stakeholders
4. number of public-private sector partnerships reported by Cps
1. iRSS data; ippC and partners’ reports
2. targeted survey feedback reports
3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports
4. ippC projects database and activities data
5. partners’ financial reports
the fluid dynamics of politics (impact of national elections on the nppo and within government structures) particularly in developing countries may limit the impact of the programme in the short-term
7. Capacity development actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon
1. Degree of uptake of m&e methods by Cps
2. number and type of reviews conducted by Cps, Rppos and other phytosanitary agencies
3. number of excellence awards provided by the ippC
4. ippC global capacity development strategy updated every 6 years
1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; ReC and other partners’ reports
2. ippC reports; Survey feedback reports
3. nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.
4. ippC m&e data5. ippC projects and activities
database data
Country level data may not be shared readily for fear that such information may impact trade opportunities for some countries
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
12
the work plan addressing the ippC national
phytosanitary capacity development strategy
(to be used by the ippC contracting parties,
the Secretariat and other organizations) is a
comprehensive and useful document that has
been endorsed by Cpm-7in 2012, after review
by the eWg CD. after the improvements, it was
recognised that the global operational work
plan is a dynamic and theoretical activity to be
accomplished over many years.
it was also considered that this document has a
strategic and non-operational nature and it would
be useful to show to governments and donors
the investment options and priorities to reinforce
phytosanitary capacities, but not hypothetical
values of the activities.
in some areas the Secretariat has a lead role to
play, while in others, such as national phytosanitary
planning, the Secretariat can support or assist an
activity led by another stakeholder.
table 3 presents the ippC Capacity Development
Workplan organized by activity, output and
subactivity, for an estimated period of six years.
For clarity purposes, each row refers to one
subactivity and is covered by a triple code (e. g. St2/
o1/a1.1) identifying the strategic objective, output
number into that objective, activity and subactivity.
the contents of the table is very useful in terms
of setting leaderships and supporting commitments
for all activities intended to implement the ippC
national phytosanitary capacity development
strategy , suggesting funding options that could
be explored by nppos, the ippC and other
organizations and adding comments and notes on
details linked to the practical implementation of
the subactivities.
Work plan for the IPPC Strategy on Capacity Development
13
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
Tabl
e 3.
The
IPPC
Cap
acit
y D
evel
opm
ent
Wor
kpla
n
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
1: N
atio
nal P
S Pl
anni
ng a
nd M
anag
emen
t
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST1/
O1/
A1.1
1. F
it-fo
r-pur
pose
to
ols
and
proc
esse
s fo
r phy
tosa
nita
ry
syst
ems
(pS)
pl
anni
ng
iden
tifyi
ng a
nd re
view
too
ls fo
r pS
capa
city
eva
luat
ion
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
ippC
Sec
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
D
onor
sD
onor
s in
clud
es b
ilate
ral,
mul
tila
tera
l, re
gion
al a
nd s
ub-r
egio
nal
fund
ed p
roje
cts
ST1/
O1/
A1.2
Dev
elop
new
or r
evis
e ex
istin
g fit
for p
urpo
se t
ools
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o, F
ao
-tC
p, D
onor
so
ther
act
ivit
ies
are
depe
nded
on
tool
s be
ing
revi
sed
or d
evel
oped
ST1/
01/A
1.3
Dev
elop
men
t of i
ppC
core
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
ippC
npp
o, R
ppo
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o, F
ao
-tC
p, D
onor
so
ther
act
ivit
ies
are
depe
nded
on
tool
s be
ing
revi
sed
or d
evel
oped
ST1/
O2/
A2.
12.
Crit
ical
com
pete
ncie
s av
aila
ble
in
the
natio
nal
phyt
osan
itary
sy
stem
to u
nder
take
na
tiona
l pla
nnin
g,
man
agem
ent a
nd
prov
ide
lead
ersh
ip
to th
e n
ppo
. Crit
ical
co
mpe
tenc
ies
avai
labl
e in
th
e na
tiona
l ph
ytos
anita
ry
syst
em to
und
erta
ke
natio
nal p
lann
ing,
m
anag
emen
t and
pr
ovid
e le
ader
ship
to
the
npp
o
Regi
onal
or n
atio
nal p
olic
y di
scus
sion
s in
clud
ing
plan
ning
man
agem
ent a
nd le
ader
ship
on
the
man
date
of
the
npp
o
Rppo
npp
o, i
ppC
Sec
and
othe
rsRp
po, n
atio
nal,
ippC
Se
c, F
ao
-tC
p, D
onor
s,
othe
rs
ST1/
O2/
A2.
2tr
aini
ng (p
roje
ct m
anag
emen
t, pr
opos
al w
ritin
g,
adm
inis
trat
ive
and
man
agem
ent,
lead
ersh
ip, s
taff
tr
aini
ng p
rogr
amm
e de
velo
pmen
t)
npp
oip
pC S
ec, R
ppo
, St
DF
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
D
onor
s, o
ther
s
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
base
d on
nee
ds
and
prio
ritie
s
ST1/
O2/
A2.
3U
nder
take
bas
elin
e st
udy
on p
lann
ing
and
man
agem
ent
requ
irem
ents
in t
he n
atio
nal p
hyto
sani
tary
sys
tem
in
clud
ing
stak
ehol
der e
ngag
emen
t
npp
oRp
po, i
ppC
Sec.
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
Don
ors
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
base
d on
nee
ds
and
prio
ritie
s
ST1/
O2/
A2.
4D
evel
op m
ento
ring
oppo
rtun
ities
to
supp
ort n
atio
nal
phyt
osan
itar
y pl
anni
ng a
nd m
anag
emen
tn
ppo
Rppo
, ipp
C Se
c,
StD
F, o
ther
sn
atio
nal,
ippC
Sec
, Rp
po, F
ao
-tC
p, D
onor
s
ST1/
O3/
A3.
13.
Bes
t pra
ctic
e fo
r nat
iona
l ph
ytos
anita
ry a
ctio
n pl
ans
deve
lope
d
Dev
elop
nat
iona
l phy
tosa
nita
ry a
ctio
n pl
ans
and
hR
plan
s an
d su
cces
sion
pla
nnin
gn
ppo
Rppo
, oth
ers,
ip
pC S
ec.
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
Don
ors
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
base
d on
nee
ds
and
prio
ritie
s
ST1/
O3/
A3.
2D
evel
op n
atio
nal e
mer
genc
y re
spon
se p
lans
for
regu
late
d pe
sts
that
inco
rpor
ate
regi
onal
em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
ns, w
here
the
y ex
ist
npp
oRp
po, o
ther
s,
ippC
Sec
.n
atio
nal,
ippC
Sec
, Rp
po, F
ao
-tC
p, D
onor
sn
atio
nal a
ctiv
itie
s ba
sed
on n
eeds
an
d pr
iorit
ies
14
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
2: P
artic
ipat
ion
in S
tand
ard
Sett
ing
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST2/
O1/
A1.1
1. e
nhan
ced
regi
onal
co
ordi
natio
n of
inpu
ts
into
the
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g pr
oces
s
Rppo
coo
rdin
ate
disc
ussi
on fo
r a/
wor
ksho
ps o
n dr
aft s
tand
ards
, new
top
ics,
spe
cific
atio
ns a
nd C
pm
prep
arat
ion
Rppo
ippC
Sec
, ReC
s, o
ther
inte
grat
ion
orga
niza
tions
Fao
, Don
ors,
ippC
Sec
ST2/
O1/
A1.2
trai
ning
Rpp
os
staf
f and
regi
onal
exp
erts
on
part
icip
atio
n in
all
stag
es o
f the
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g pr
oces
s (e
.g. t
opic
s, s
peci
ficat
ions
, rep
rese
ntat
ion
on
the
SC a
nd in
oth
er t
echn
ical
bod
es, d
raft
sta
ndar
ds)
ippC
Sec
Rppo
s, e
xper
tsip
pC S
ec, F
ao
, Don
ors,
Rp
pos
ST2/
O1/
A1.3
trai
ning
Rpp
os
staf
f and
regi
onal
exp
erts
to
faci
litat
e/co
ordi
nate
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g m
eetin
gsip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
exp
erts
, Rp
pos
ippC
Sec
, Fa
o, D
onor
s,
Rppo
sli
nked
to b
udge
ted
wor
ksho
ps th
at th
e ip
pC
hold
s. th
is ex
pend
iture
repr
esen
ts a
n ad
ditio
nal
days
cos
t to
the
norm
al 5
day
mee
ting
ST2/
O2/
A2.
12.
enh
ance
d in
volv
emen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s at
na
tiona
l lev
el
hol
d m
ulti
-sta
keho
lder
dis
cuss
ion,
fora
, tra
inin
g,
wor
ksho
ps, w
eb o
n dr
aft i
Spm
s, n
ew t
opic
s,
spec
ifica
tions
, Cpm
, etc
npp
oRp
pos,
eCs
oth
er
orga
niza
tions
, ip
pC S
ec, F
ao
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
ST2/
O3/
A3.
13.
Qua
lity
of c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s pa
rtic
ipat
ion
impr
oved
hol
d or
ient
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r new
Cpm
del
egat
esip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
Fa
oD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
ca
mee
ting
of a
few
hou
rs p
rior t
o st
art o
f th
e Cp
m
ST2/
O3/
A3.
2pe
er/c
oach
ing/
men
torin
g fo
r new
mem
bers
of
sub
sidi
ary
bodi
es o
f th
e ip
pC
ippC
Sec
Rppo
s, F
ao
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
a m
eetin
g of
a fe
w h
ours
prio
r to
star
t of
the
Subs
idia
ry B
ody'
s m
eetin
g (e
.g. B
urea
u,
Spta
, eW
g, t
ps, S
C et
c.)
ST2/
O3/
A3.
3Su
ppor
t X p
artic
ipat
ion
in e
Wg
s an
d te
chni
cal p
anel
s (m
ax 2
tec
hnic
al s
tand
ards
per
yea
r)ip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
npp
os
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
onl
y do
ne fo
r tec
hnic
al s
tand
ards
for
whi
ch t
he m
embe
rs o
f an
eWg
or t
p ne
ed
a gl
obal
vie
w o
f the
top
ic a
t han
d
ST2/
O3/
A3.
4C
ondu
ct in
dep
th d
iscu
ssio
n w
ith a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs, o
n dr
aft i
Spm
sn
ppo
Rppo
sD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
c
Revi
ew o
f dra
ft s
tand
ards
at n
atio
nal l
evel
npp
oRp
po, R
eCs a
nd
othe
r org
aniza
tions
Revi
ew o
f dra
ft s
tand
ards
at r
egio
nal l
evel
Rppo
npp
o
ST2/
O3/
A3.
5en
gage
gov
ernm
ent t
o co
mit
the
hum
an a
nd fi
nanc
ial r
esou
rces
fo
r the
npp
o to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e st
anda
rd s
ettin
g pr
oces
s an
d fo
rmal
ize
its c
omm
itmen
ts u
sing
rele
vant
inst
rum
ents
npp
oRp
po, R
eCs
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
this
act
ivit
y ca
n be
com
bine
d w
ith
othe
r w
orks
hops
or c
ondu
cted
inde
pend
entl
y
ST2/
O3/
A3.
6m
onit
orin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
Cpm
npp
os,
Rpp
os,
ip
pC S
ec, D
onor
sD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
c
ann
ual r
epor
ts
mid
term
revi
ew
exte
rnal
eva
luat
ion
15
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
2: P
artic
ipat
ion
in S
tand
ard
Sett
ing
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST2/
O1/
A1.1
1. e
nhan
ced
regi
onal
co
ordi
natio
n of
inpu
ts
into
the
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g pr
oces
s
Rppo
coo
rdin
ate
disc
ussi
on fo
r a/
wor
ksho
ps o
n dr
aft s
tand
ards
, new
top
ics,
spe
cific
atio
ns a
nd C
pm
prep
arat
ion
Rppo
ippC
Sec
, ReC
s, o
ther
inte
grat
ion
orga
niza
tions
Fao
, Don
ors,
ippC
Sec
ST2/
O1/
A1.2
trai
ning
Rpp
os
staf
f and
regi
onal
exp
erts
on
part
icip
atio
n in
all
stag
es o
f the
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g pr
oces
s (e
.g. t
opic
s, s
peci
ficat
ions
, rep
rese
ntat
ion
on
the
SC a
nd in
oth
er t
echn
ical
bod
es, d
raft
sta
ndar
ds)
ippC
Sec
Rppo
s, e
xper
tsip
pC S
ec, F
ao
, Don
ors,
Rp
pos
ST2/
O1/
A1.3
trai
ning
Rpp
os
staf
f and
regi
onal
exp
erts
to
faci
litat
e/co
ordi
nate
sta
ndar
d se
ttin
g m
eetin
gsip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
exp
erts
, Rp
pos
ippC
Sec
, Fa
o, D
onor
s,
Rppo
sli
nked
to b
udge
ted
wor
ksho
ps th
at th
e ip
pC
hold
s. th
is ex
pend
iture
repr
esen
ts a
n ad
ditio
nal
days
cos
t to
the
norm
al 5
day
mee
ting
ST2/
O2/
A2.
12.
enh
ance
d in
volv
emen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s at
na
tiona
l lev
el
hol
d m
ulti
-sta
keho
lder
dis
cuss
ion,
fora
, tra
inin
g,
wor
ksho
ps, w
eb o
n dr
aft i
Spm
s, n
ew t
opic
s,
spec
ifica
tions
, Cpm
, etc
npp
oRp
pos,
eCs
oth
er
orga
niza
tions
, ip
pC S
ec, F
ao
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
ST2/
O3/
A3.
13.
Qua
lity
of c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s pa
rtic
ipat
ion
impr
oved
hol
d or
ient
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r new
Cpm
del
egat
esip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
Fa
oD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
ca
mee
ting
of a
few
hou
rs p
rior t
o st
art o
f th
e Cp
m
ST2/
O3/
A3.
2pe
er/c
oach
ing/
men
torin
g fo
r new
mem
bers
of
sub
sidi
ary
bodi
es o
f th
e ip
pC
ippC
Sec
Rppo
s, F
ao
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
a m
eetin
g of
a fe
w h
ours
prio
r to
star
t of
the
Subs
idia
ry B
ody'
s m
eetin
g (e
.g. B
urea
u,
Spta
, eW
g, t
ps, S
C et
c.)
ST2/
O3/
A3.
3Su
ppor
t X p
artic
ipat
ion
in e
Wg
s an
d te
chni
cal p
anel
s (m
ax 2
tec
hnic
al s
tand
ards
per
yea
r)ip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
npp
os
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
onl
y do
ne fo
r tec
hnic
al s
tand
ards
for
whi
ch t
he m
embe
rs o
f an
eWg
or t
p ne
ed
a gl
obal
vie
w o
f the
top
ic a
t han
d
ST2/
O3/
A3.
4C
ondu
ct in
dep
th d
iscu
ssio
n w
ith a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs, o
n dr
aft i
Spm
sn
ppo
Rppo
sD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
c
Revi
ew o
f dra
ft s
tand
ards
at n
atio
nal l
evel
npp
oRp
po, R
eCs a
nd
othe
r org
aniza
tions
Revi
ew o
f dra
ft s
tand
ards
at r
egio
nal l
evel
Rppo
npp
o
ST2/
O3/
A3.
5en
gage
gov
ernm
ent t
o co
mit
the
hum
an a
nd fi
nanc
ial r
esou
rces
fo
r the
npp
o to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e st
anda
rd s
ettin
g pr
oces
s an
d fo
rmal
ize
its c
omm
itmen
ts u
sing
rele
vant
inst
rum
ents
npp
oRp
po, R
eCs
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
this
act
ivit
y ca
n be
com
bine
d w
ith
othe
r w
orks
hops
or c
ondu
cted
inde
pend
entl
y
ST2/
O3/
A3.
6m
onit
orin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
Cpm
npp
os,
Rpp
os,
ip
pC S
ec, D
onor
sD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
c
ann
ual r
epor
ts
mid
term
revi
ew
exte
rnal
eva
luat
ion
Stra
tegi
c A
reas
3: S
tand
ards
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST3/
01/A
1en
hanc
ed in
volv
emen
t of
sta
keho
lder
s at
na
tiona
l lev
el
iden
tifyi
ng im
plem
enta
tion
issu
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
adop
ted
and
draf
t sta
ndar
ds (a
ppro
x 5
per y
ear)
.n
ppo
Rppo
s,
ReC
s o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns,
ippC
Sec
, Fa
o
Don
ors,
npp
o, R
ppo
, Fa
o, i
ppC
Sec
acc
ompa
nyin
g dr
aft i
mpl
emen
tatio
n gu
idel
ines
with
dr
aft s
tand
ards
(app
rox
5 pe
r yea
r).
a. p
repa
re g
uide
line
B. C
ircul
ate
/rev
iew
gui
delin
eC
. Dis
trib
ute
guid
elin
e at
regi
onal
wor
ksho
ps
ippC
Sec
/ex
pert
expe
rts,
Rpp
os,
n
ppo
sD
onor
s, n
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
, ipp
C Se
cim
plem
enta
tion
requ
irem
ents
gui
delin
e pr
epar
ed t
hat g
oes
out w
ith
each
dra
ft
stan
dard
sen
t for
cou
ntry
con
sult
atio
n.
ST3/
O2/
A2
impr
oved
un
ders
tand
ing
of
impl
emen
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts o
f sp
ecifi
c st
anda
rds
Dev
elop
man
uals
; gui
delin
es; f
acts
heet
s; c
apac
ity
need
s as
sess
men
t to
ols
for i
mpl
emen
ting
sp
ecifi
c st
anda
rds
impl
emen
tati
on o
f 34
stan
dard
s @
201
1
Dev
elop
men
t of n
ew to
ols
for i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
ST3/
O2/
A2.
1Su
ppor
t pro
vide
d fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
of
prio
rity
iSpm
s
trai
ning
on
impl
emen
tatio
n of
iSpm
s
nat
iona
l lev
el
impl
emen
tatio
n of
34
stan
dard
s @
201
1ex
pert
s,
npp
oRp
po
Regi
onal
leve
lRp
po/
expe
rts
ippC
Sec
Wor
ksho
ps
hig
her l
evel
edu
catio
nRp
poip
pC S
ec, n
ppo
esta
blis
hmen
t of c
ente
rs o
f exc
elle
nce
esta
blis
hmen
t of m
ento
ring
syst
em fo
r cou
ntrie
s
to h
elp
each
oth
erRp
poRe
Cs a
nd o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns,
ippC
Sec
, npp
os
ST3/
O2/
A2.
2m
obili
ze re
sour
ces
for i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
of s
tand
ards
npp
on
ppo
s, R
ppo
s,
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
16
Stra
tegi
c A
reas
3: S
tand
ards
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST3/
O2/
A2.
3D
evel
op a
dvoc
acy
mat
eria
lsip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, Re
Cs
and
ot
her o
rgan
iza-
tions
, Spt
a
npp
os,
Don
ors,
StD
F, Rp
pos,
ReC
S a
nd o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns, i
ppC
Sec
Con
tinuo
us p
rogr
amm
e an
d dr
aws
on a
ll as
pect
s re
late
d in
the
CD
str
ateg
y
adv
ocat
e an
d Co
mm
unic
ate
npp
o
Dev
elop
com
mun
icat
ion
mat
eria
lsip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns,
Spta
Dev
elop
pla
nnin
g to
ols
for s
peci
fic iS
pms
id
entifi
ed b
y th
e n
ppo
sip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
ot
her
orga
niza
tions
Dev
elop
reso
urce
pla
nn
ppo
Rppo
s, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns,
Spta
Staf
fing
npp
o
dono
r mat
chin
gip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
ReCS
an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
men
torin
g (s
ee a
ctiv
ity 2
.2)
npp
oRp
pos,
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, ip
pC S
ec
impl
emen
t iRS
S pr
ogra
mm
eip
pC S
ecRp
po, n
ppo
, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Stra
tegi
c A
reas
4: C
omm
unic
atio
n an
d Co
ordi
natio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST4/
O1/
A1in
form
atio
n an
d re
sour
ces
of
inte
rnat
iona
l, re
gion
al
and
natio
nal b
odie
s id
entifi
ed, m
anag
ed
and
coor
dina
ted
esta
blis
h ba
selin
eip
pC a
nd
Rppo
sn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
ST4/
O1/
A1.1
Build
iCt
syst
em a
cces
sibl
e to
don
ors
and
reci
pien
ts
with
lim
ited
gen
eral
acc
ess
ippC
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
s
ST4/
O1/
A1.2
Dev
elop
and
con
duct
per
iodi
c su
rvey
of c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
rogr
ams
to p
opul
ate
the
syst
emip
pCn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
ST4/
O1/
A1.3
trai
n us
ers
on s
yste
m o
pera
tions
.ip
pCn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o2/
a2.
1m
etho
ds a
nd p
athw
ays
for c
omm
unic
atio
n us
ed
esta
blis
h “h
elp
desk
” w
hich
is e
mpo
wer
ed t
o fa
cilit
ate
and
mai
ntai
n pa
rtne
ring
betw
een
dono
rs a
nd re
cipi
ents
ippC
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sC
alcu
late
d in
the
iRSS
pro
gram
St4/
o2/
a2.
2ea
ch s
ucce
ssiv
e Cp
m e
ncou
rage
s th
e us
e of
hel
p de
skC
pmn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o3/
a3.
2m
echa
nism
and
sy
nerg
ies
for
coor
dina
tion
used
Con
trac
ting
part
ies
or R
ppo
s re
port
s in
form
atio
n to
ip
pC o
n on
goin
g or
pla
nned
pro
ject
s in
mem
ber n
atio
nsRp
pon
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o4/
a4.
1C
ompe
tenc
ies
for
reso
urce
mob
iliza
tion
and
man
agem
ent
iden
tified
and
su
ppor
ted
thro
ugh
the
natio
nal p
hyto
sani
tary
ac
tion
plan
nat
iona
l net
wor
king
mec
hani
sm e
stab
lishe
dn
ppo
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sin
itia
l dev
elop
men
t ac
tivi
ty m
ay
requ
ire ip
pC in
terv
enti
on f
or p
rovi
ding
de
scrip
tion
of w
hat
is r
equi
red
- re
gion
al t
rave
l
St4/
o4/
a4.
2n
atio
nal c
oord
inat
ion
com
mit
tee
(SpS
/bi
osec
urit
y/tr
ade
faci
litat
ion,
etc
) est
ablis
hed
to e
ngag
e ot
her
min
istr
ies/
depa
rtm
ents
in c
oope
rati
ve a
ctiv
ities
tha
t ca
n be
nefit
pla
nt h
ealth
eff
orts
npp
on
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
init
ial d
evel
opm
ent a
ctiv
ity
may
requ
ire
ippC
inte
rven
tion
for p
rovi
ding
des
crip
tion
of w
hat i
s re
quire
d - r
egio
nal t
rave
l
St4/
o4/
a5.
1D
evel
op li
nkag
es b
etw
een
and
amon
g ot
her r
egio
nal
and
othe
r mul
tinat
iona
l org
aniz
atio
nsip
pC/
Rppo
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sFi
ve d
onor
con
fere
nces
hel
d on
a re
gion
al
basi
s at
an
aver
age
cost
of $
75,0
00
17
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
Stra
tegi
c A
reas
3: S
tand
ards
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST3/
O2/
A2.
3D
evel
op a
dvoc
acy
mat
eria
lsip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, Re
Cs
and
ot
her o
rgan
iza-
tions
, Spt
a
npp
os,
Don
ors,
StD
F, Rp
pos,
ReC
S a
nd o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns, i
ppC
Sec
Con
tinuo
us p
rogr
amm
e an
d dr
aws
on a
ll as
pect
s re
late
d in
the
CD
str
ateg
y
adv
ocat
e an
d Co
mm
unic
ate
npp
o
Dev
elop
com
mun
icat
ion
mat
eria
lsip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns,
Spta
Dev
elop
pla
nnin
g to
ols
for s
peci
fic iS
pms
id
entifi
ed b
y th
e n
ppo
sip
pC S
ec/
Fao
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
ot
her
orga
niza
tions
Dev
elop
reso
urce
pla
nn
ppo
Rppo
s, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns,
Spta
Staf
fing
npp
o
dono
r mat
chin
gip
pC S
ecRp
pos,
ReCS
an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
men
torin
g (s
ee a
ctiv
ity 2
.2)
npp
oRp
pos,
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, ip
pC S
ec
impl
emen
t iRS
S pr
ogra
mm
eip
pC S
ecRp
po, n
ppo
, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Stra
tegi
c A
reas
4: C
omm
unic
atio
n an
d Co
ordi
natio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
ST4/
O1/
A1in
form
atio
n an
d re
sour
ces
of
inte
rnat
iona
l, re
gion
al
and
natio
nal b
odie
s id
entifi
ed, m
anag
ed
and
coor
dina
ted
esta
blis
h ba
selin
eip
pC a
nd
Rppo
sn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
ST4/
O1/
A1.1
Build
iCt
syst
em a
cces
sibl
e to
don
ors
and
reci
pien
ts
with
lim
ited
gen
eral
acc
ess
ippC
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
s
ST4/
O1/
A1.2
Dev
elop
and
con
duct
per
iodi
c su
rvey
of c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
rogr
ams
to p
opul
ate
the
syst
emip
pCn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
ST4/
O1/
A1.3
trai
n us
ers
on s
yste
m o
pera
tions
.ip
pCn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o2/
a2.
1m
etho
ds a
nd p
athw
ays
for c
omm
unic
atio
n us
ed
esta
blis
h “h
elp
desk
” w
hich
is e
mpo
wer
ed t
o fa
cilit
ate
and
mai
ntai
n pa
rtne
ring
betw
een
dono
rs a
nd re
cipi
ents
ippC
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sC
alcu
late
d in
the
iRSS
pro
gram
St4/
o2/
a2.
2ea
ch s
ucce
ssiv
e Cp
m e
ncou
rage
s th
e us
e of
hel
p de
skC
pmn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o3/
a3.
2m
echa
nism
and
sy
nerg
ies
for
coor
dina
tion
used
Con
trac
ting
part
ies
or R
ppo
s re
port
s in
form
atio
n to
ip
pC o
n on
goin
g or
pla
nned
pro
ject
s in
mem
ber n
atio
nsRp
pon
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St4/
o4/
a4.
1C
ompe
tenc
ies
for
reso
urce
mob
iliza
tion
and
man
agem
ent
iden
tified
and
su
ppor
ted
thro
ugh
the
natio
nal p
hyto
sani
tary
ac
tion
plan
nat
iona
l net
wor
king
mec
hani
sm e
stab
lishe
dn
ppo
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sin
itia
l dev
elop
men
t ac
tivi
ty m
ay
requ
ire ip
pC in
terv
enti
on f
or p
rovi
ding
de
scrip
tion
of w
hat
is r
equi
red
- re
gion
al t
rave
l
St4/
o4/
a4.
2n
atio
nal c
oord
inat
ion
com
mit
tee
(SpS
/bi
osec
urit
y/tr
ade
faci
litat
ion,
etc
) est
ablis
hed
to e
ngag
e ot
her
min
istr
ies/
depa
rtm
ents
in c
oope
rati
ve a
ctiv
ities
tha
t ca
n be
nefit
pla
nt h
ealth
eff
orts
npp
on
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
init
ial d
evel
opm
ent a
ctiv
ity
may
requ
ire
ippC
inte
rven
tion
for p
rovi
ding
des
crip
tion
of w
hat i
s re
quire
d - r
egio
nal t
rave
l
St4/
o4/
a5.
1D
evel
op li
nkag
es b
etw
een
and
amon
g ot
her r
egio
nal
and
othe
r mul
tinat
iona
l org
aniz
atio
nsip
pC/
Rppo
npp
os
and
Rppo
sD
onor
sFi
ve d
onor
con
fere
nces
hel
d on
a re
gion
al
basi
s at
an
aver
age
cost
of $
75,0
00
18
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
5: P
est I
nfor
mat
ion
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St5/
o1/
a1C
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s up
date
d re
gula
ted
pest
lis
ts a
nd t
imel
y re
port
ou
tbre
aks
of re
gula
ted
pest
s
gap
ana
lysi
s to
det
erm
ine
requ
irem
ents
for
surv
eilla
nce,
dia
gnos
tics,
refe
renc
e co
llect
ions
, in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s et
c.
ippC
ippC
/Rp
po/
npp
o a
nd o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St5/
o2/
a2
pest
dat
a an
alys
ed,
espe
cial
ly p
rovi
ding
ea
rly w
arni
ng fo
r ris
k m
anag
emen
t, m
arke
t ac
cess
and
risk
ana
lysi
s
nat
iona
l pla
nnin
g ac
tivi
ties
rela
ted
to s
urve
illan
ce,
diag
nost
ics
and
rela
ted
acti
vitie
s un
derp
inni
ng
food
sec
urit
y
npp
os
ippC
/Rp
po/
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
this
is a
com
pone
nt fr
eque
ntly
inte
grat
ed
into
man
y co
oper
atio
n pr
ojec
ts
St5/
o/a
3.1
enha
ncem
ent o
f sur
veill
ance
ski
lls t
hrou
gh t
rain
ing
- es
peci
ally
pra
ctic
al a
pplic
atio
nn
ppo
Rppo
s, ip
pC
Sec,
tec
hnic
al
ass
ista
nce
prov
ider
s
Don
ors
ass
umin
g 80
cou
ntrie
s re
ceiv
ing
400.
000
each
ove
r 2 y
ears
.
St5/
o/a
3.2
Dev
elop
men
t of s
peci
aliz
ed d
iagn
ostic
sup
port
at a
re
gion
al le
vel
Rppo
npp
o/
ippC
Don
ors
Refle
cted
as
ongo
ing
over
the
life
of t
he
proj
ect.
St5/
o/a
4.1
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
de
velo
pmen
t of l
abor
ator
y in
fras
truc
ture
npp
on
ppo
/Rp
po/
ippC
Don
ors
nee
ds d
eter
min
ed b
ased
on
gap
anal
ysis
an
d m
idte
rm re
view
. a
ssum
ing
80 c
ount
ries
rece
ivin
g 50
0.00
0
St5/
o/a
4.2
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
the
pr
ovis
ion
of d
iagn
ostic
too
lsn
ppo
/Rp
po/
ippC
Don
ors
this
will
incl
ude
taxo
nom
ic re
fere
nce
mat
eria
l, el
ectr
onic
or o
ther
wis
e.
St5/
o/a
4.3
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
de
velo
pmen
t of n
etw
orki
ngip
pCRp
po/
npp
oD
onor
svi
sion
is t
o es
tabl
ish
a ne
twor
k, re
gist
ers
of e
xper
tise,
etc
.
St5/
o/a
4.4
enha
ncem
ent o
f ref
eren
ce c
olle
ctio
ns a
nd re
late
d ph
ysic
al fa
cilit
ies
and
cura
tion
prot
ocol
sn
ppo
Rppo
/ip
pCD
onor
sD
riven
by
gap
anal
ysis
, and
revi
site
d pe
riodi
cally
St5/
o/a
4.5
Con
firm
ator
y id
entifi
catio
ns fo
r spe
cim
ens
to a
ssis
t w
ith re
fere
nce
colle
ctio
ns, e
arly
war
ning
for r
isk
man
agem
ent,
mar
ket a
cces
s an
d ris
k an
alys
is
npp
oRp
po, i
ppC
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
5.1
Crea
te a
nd d
eplo
y in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s at n
atio
nal l
evel
. m
echa
nism
s cre
ated
to p
rovi
de p
est i
nfor
mat
ion
to n
ppo
sn
ppo
ippC
/Rp
poD
onor
s
St5/
o/a
5.2
trai
ning
in c
ompi
latio
n of
pes
t inf
orm
atio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of i
nfor
mat
ion
syst
ems
prov
ided
to
natio
nal a
ctor
s, in
clud
ing
npp
os
npp
oip
pC/
Rppo
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
5.3.
Dat
a en
try
npp
os
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
6.1
Cap
abili
ty t
o pr
ovid
e pl
ant p
est i
nfor
mat
ion
enha
nced
.
trai
ning
pro
vide
d in
ana
lysi
s of
pes
t inf
orm
atio
n,
prep
arat
ion
of p
est r
epor
ts a
nd is
suin
g of
pes
t ale
rtn
ppo
/
Rppo
ippC
Don
ors
Dep
ende
nt o
n co
mpl
exit
y of
tas
ks t
o be
do
ne
St5/
o1/
a7
pest
info
rmat
ion
anal
yzed
; rep
orts
and
ear
ly w
arni
ngs i
ssue
dn
ppo
sip
pC/
Rppo
/n
ppo
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
8em
bed
ippC
rela
ted
mat
eria
l in
natio
nal t
ertia
ry a
nd
voca
tiona
l cur
ricul
an
ppo
sip
pC/
Rppo
Don
ors
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
6: R
esou
rce
Mob
ilaza
tion
(Fun
drai
sing
)
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St6/
o1/a
1.1
enha
nced
cap
acit
y to
en
gage
don
ors
at a
ll le
vels
Don
or c
oord
inat
ion
mee
tings
at a
ll le
vels
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
ippC
Sec
, Don
ors
St6/
o1/a
1.2
Coo
rdin
ate
and
max
imiz
e th
e ef
fect
iven
ess
of t
he fu
nds
avai
labl
e fr
om v
ario
us s
ourc
es.
StD
F, ip
pC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
, Re
C’s,
Don
ors
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o, t
rust
Fu
nds,
Don
ors
St6/
o1/a
1.3
Dev
elop
gui
delin
es t
o be
use
d by
npp
os
for e
ngag
ing
dono
rsip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
oip
pC S
ec, R
ppo
, Don
ors
St6/
o1/
a1.4
Dev
elop
reco
mm
enda
tions
to
be u
sed
by d
onor
s fo
r gr
antin
g fu
ndin
g su
ppor
tip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
on
atio
nal,
ippC
Sec
, Rp
po, D
onor
s
St6/
o1/
a1.5
hire
a fu
ll-tim
e fu
ndra
iser
in t
he ip
pC S
ecre
taria
tip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
and
oth
ers
trus
t Fun
ds, i
ppC
Sec,
D
onor
sSt
aff r
esou
rce
shar
ed w
ith
othe
r are
as
of th
e ip
pC
St6/
o2/
a1.6
trai
n us
ers
on s
yste
m o
pera
tions
.ip
pC S
ecn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St6/
o2/
a2.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
to ra
ise
fund
s fr
om
natio
nal s
ourc
es.
Und
erta
ke n
atio
nal b
asel
ine
anal
ysis
and
det
erm
ine
leve
l of f
unds
requ
ired.
npp
oip
pC S
ec, R
ppo
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
Don
ors
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St1
St6/
o2/
a2.
2D
evel
op a
mec
hani
sm t
o en
sure
sus
tain
abili
ty o
f the
op
erat
ions
of a
n n
ppo
, inc
ludi
ng c
ost s
harin
g /c
ost-
reco
very
/use
r-pay
mod
els
npp
oip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, nat
iona
l st
akeh
olde
rs
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, nat
iona
l end
-us
er o
f pS
serv
ices
, D
onor
s
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d pr
iorit
y an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St
1
St6/
o2/
a2.
3n
ppo
man
agem
ent d
evel
ops
and
purs
ues
appr
opria
te
fund
ing
leve
l thr
ough
the
nat
iona
l bud
geta
ry p
roce
sses
npp
on
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o,
nat
iona
l end
-use
r of p
S se
rvic
es, D
onor
s
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St1
19
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
5: P
est I
nfor
mat
ion
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St5/
o1/
a1C
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s up
date
d re
gula
ted
pest
lis
ts a
nd t
imel
y re
port
ou
tbre
aks
of re
gula
ted
pest
s
gap
ana
lysi
s to
det
erm
ine
requ
irem
ents
for
surv
eilla
nce,
dia
gnos
tics,
refe
renc
e co
llect
ions
, in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s et
c.
ippC
ippC
/Rp
po/
npp
o a
nd o
ther
or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St5/
o2/
a2
pest
dat
a an
alys
ed,
espe
cial
ly p
rovi
ding
ea
rly w
arni
ng fo
r ris
k m
anag
emen
t, m
arke
t ac
cess
and
risk
ana
lysi
s
nat
iona
l pla
nnin
g ac
tivi
ties
rela
ted
to s
urve
illan
ce,
diag
nost
ics
and
rela
ted
acti
vitie
s un
derp
inni
ng
food
sec
urit
y
npp
os
ippC
/Rp
po/
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
this
is a
com
pone
nt fr
eque
ntly
inte
grat
ed
into
man
y co
oper
atio
n pr
ojec
ts
St5/
o/a
3.1
enha
ncem
ent o
f sur
veill
ance
ski
lls t
hrou
gh t
rain
ing
- es
peci
ally
pra
ctic
al a
pplic
atio
nn
ppo
Rppo
s, ip
pC
Sec,
tec
hnic
al
ass
ista
nce
prov
ider
s
Don
ors
ass
umin
g 80
cou
ntrie
s re
ceiv
ing
400.
000
each
ove
r 2 y
ears
.
St5/
o/a
3.2
Dev
elop
men
t of s
peci
aliz
ed d
iagn
ostic
sup
port
at a
re
gion
al le
vel
Rppo
npp
o/
ippC
Don
ors
Refle
cted
as
ongo
ing
over
the
life
of t
he
proj
ect.
St5/
o/a
4.1
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
de
velo
pmen
t of l
abor
ator
y in
fras
truc
ture
npp
on
ppo
/Rp
po/
ippC
Don
ors
nee
ds d
eter
min
ed b
ased
on
gap
anal
ysis
an
d m
idte
rm re
view
. a
ssum
ing
80 c
ount
ries
rece
ivin
g 50
0.00
0
St5/
o/a
4.2
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
the
pr
ovis
ion
of d
iagn
ostic
too
lsn
ppo
/Rp
po/
ippC
Don
ors
this
will
incl
ude
taxo
nom
ic re
fere
nce
mat
eria
l, el
ectr
onic
or o
ther
wis
e.
St5/
o/a
4.3
enha
ncem
ent o
f dia
gnos
tic c
apab
ility
thr
ough
de
velo
pmen
t of n
etw
orki
ngip
pCRp
po/
npp
oD
onor
svi
sion
is t
o es
tabl
ish
a ne
twor
k, re
gist
ers
of e
xper
tise,
etc
.
St5/
o/a
4.4
enha
ncem
ent o
f ref
eren
ce c
olle
ctio
ns a
nd re
late
d ph
ysic
al fa
cilit
ies
and
cura
tion
prot
ocol
sn
ppo
Rppo
/ip
pCD
onor
sD
riven
by
gap
anal
ysis
, and
revi
site
d pe
riodi
cally
St5/
o/a
4.5
Con
firm
ator
y id
entifi
catio
ns fo
r spe
cim
ens
to a
ssis
t w
ith re
fere
nce
colle
ctio
ns, e
arly
war
ning
for r
isk
man
agem
ent,
mar
ket a
cces
s an
d ris
k an
alys
is
npp
oRp
po, i
ppC
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
5.1
Crea
te a
nd d
eplo
y in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s at n
atio
nal l
evel
. m
echa
nism
s cre
ated
to p
rovi
de p
est i
nfor
mat
ion
to n
ppo
sn
ppo
ippC
/Rp
poD
onor
s
St5/
o/a
5.2
trai
ning
in c
ompi
latio
n of
pes
t inf
orm
atio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of i
nfor
mat
ion
syst
ems
prov
ided
to
natio
nal a
ctor
s, in
clud
ing
npp
os
npp
oip
pC/
Rppo
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
5.3.
Dat
a en
try
npp
os
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
6.1
Cap
abili
ty t
o pr
ovid
e pl
ant p
est i
nfor
mat
ion
enha
nced
.
trai
ning
pro
vide
d in
ana
lysi
s of
pes
t inf
orm
atio
n,
prep
arat
ion
of p
est r
epor
ts a
nd is
suin
g of
pes
t ale
rtn
ppo
/
Rppo
ippC
Don
ors
Dep
ende
nt o
n co
mpl
exit
y of
tas
ks t
o be
do
ne
St5/
o1/
a7
pest
info
rmat
ion
anal
yzed
; rep
orts
and
ear
ly w
arni
ngs i
ssue
dn
ppo
sip
pC/
Rppo
/n
ppo
Don
ors
St5/
o/a
8em
bed
ippC
rela
ted
mat
eria
l in
natio
nal t
ertia
ry a
nd
voca
tiona
l cur
ricul
an
ppo
sip
pC/
Rppo
Don
ors
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
6: R
esou
rce
Mob
ilaza
tion
(Fun
drai
sing
)
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St6/
o1/a
1.1
enha
nced
cap
acit
y to
en
gage
don
ors
at a
ll le
vels
Don
or c
oord
inat
ion
mee
tings
at a
ll le
vels
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
ippC
Sec
, Don
ors
St6/
o1/a
1.2
Coo
rdin
ate
and
max
imiz
e th
e ef
fect
iven
ess
of t
he fu
nds
avai
labl
e fr
om v
ario
us s
ourc
es.
StD
F, ip
pC
Sec
npp
o, R
ppo
, Re
C’s,
Don
ors
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o, t
rust
Fu
nds,
Don
ors
St6/
o1/a
1.3
Dev
elop
gui
delin
es t
o be
use
d by
npp
os
for e
ngag
ing
dono
rsip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
oip
pC S
ec, R
ppo
, Don
ors
St6/
o1/
a1.4
Dev
elop
reco
mm
enda
tions
to
be u
sed
by d
onor
s fo
r gr
antin
g fu
ndin
g su
ppor
tip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
on
atio
nal,
ippC
Sec
, Rp
po, D
onor
s
St6/
o1/
a1.5
hire
a fu
ll-tim
e fu
ndra
iser
in t
he ip
pC S
ecre
taria
tip
pC S
ecn
ppo
, Rpp
o,
Fao
and
oth
ers
trus
t Fun
ds, i
ppC
Sec,
D
onor
sSt
aff r
esou
rce
shar
ed w
ith
othe
r are
as
of th
e ip
pC
St6/
o2/
a1.6
trai
n us
ers
on s
yste
m o
pera
tions
.ip
pC S
ecn
ppo
s an
d Rp
pos
Don
ors
St6/
o2/
a2.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
to ra
ise
fund
s fr
om
natio
nal s
ourc
es.
Und
erta
ke n
atio
nal b
asel
ine
anal
ysis
and
det
erm
ine
leve
l of f
unds
requ
ired.
npp
oip
pC S
ec, R
ppo
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, Fa
o-t
Cp,
Don
ors
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St1
St6/
o2/
a2.
2D
evel
op a
mec
hani
sm t
o en
sure
sus
tain
abili
ty o
f the
op
erat
ions
of a
n n
ppo
, inc
ludi
ng c
ost s
harin
g /c
ost-
reco
very
/use
r-pay
mod
els
npp
oip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, nat
iona
l st
akeh
olde
rs
nat
iona
l, ip
pC S
ec,
Rppo
, nat
iona
l end
-us
er o
f pS
serv
ices
, D
onor
s
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d pr
iorit
y an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St
1
St6/
o2/
a2.
3n
ppo
man
agem
ent d
evel
ops
and
purs
ues
appr
opria
te
fund
ing
leve
l thr
ough
the
nat
iona
l bud
geta
ry p
roce
sses
npp
on
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
ippC
Sec
, Rpp
o,
nat
iona
l end
-use
r of p
S se
rvic
es, D
onor
s
nat
iona
l act
ivit
ies
will
be
base
d on
nee
d an
d co
st is
con
side
red
unde
r St1
20
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
7: A
dvoc
acy
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St7/
o1/a
1.1
enha
nced
invo
lvem
ent
of t
he n
ppo
in
form
ulat
ing
rele
vant
na
tiona
l pol
icie
s
Dev
elop
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
; del
iver
tra
inin
g; e
valu
ate
trai
ning
impa
ct o
n po
licy
mul
tinat
ion-
al o
rgan
iza-
tions
Fao
. ipp
C Se
c.,
Rppo
/Re
CS
and
othe
r org
aniz
atio
ns
iFa
D, F
ao
, WB,
npp
o
St7/
o1/a
1.2
nat
iona
l and
regi
onal
men
torin
gn
ppo
/Rp
poip
pC S
ecn
ppo
/Rp
poC
ostin
g on
ly s
taff
requ
ired
by ip
pC S
ec
and
Rppo
St7/
o1/a
1.3
Con
duct
stu
dy o
f pol
icy
docu
men
ts fo
r pos
sibl
e im
pact
on
the
phy
tosa
nita
ry s
yste
mRp
po/R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
za-
tions
Fao
Rppo
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, iFa
D,
Fao
, WB,
npp
o
St7/
o2/
a2.
2en
hanc
ed n
ppo
ca
paci
ty t
o pr
omot
e th
eir o
wn
capa
city
de
velo
pmen
t nee
ds
Dev
elop
gui
delin
es fo
r phy
tosa
nita
ry c
apac
ity
build
ing
base
d on
par
is p
rinci
ples
ippC
Sec
Fao
, npp
os,
Rp
pos
StD
F,Fa
o,W
B
St7/
o3/
a3.
1n
ppo
s ha
ve b
ette
r ca
paci
ty t
o de
velo
p an
d im
plem
ent
com
mun
icat
ion/
advo
cacy
str
ateg
ies
Dev
elop
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
ippC
Sec
Fao
Fao
, WB,
iFa
D
Del
iver
tra
inin
gRp
pos,
ReC
S an
d ot
her o
rga-
niza
tions
expe
rt/
npp
o/
ippC
Sec
eval
uate
tra
inin
g im
pact
npp
oex
pert
St7/
o4/
a4.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
to
coor
dina
te n
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
enga
ge in
dust
ry a
nd o
ther
priv
ate
sect
or s
take
hold
ers
and
ng
os
npp
oRp
po/
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
priv
ate
Sect
or, n
ppo
, Rp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
St7/
o4/
a4.
2Fo
rmal
ize
regu
lar l
inka
ges
– br
idge
bui
ldin
g w
ith
cust
oms,
imm
igra
tion,
tra
de g
roup
s an
d pr
ivat
e se
ctor
npp
oRe
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
nspr
ivat
e Se
ctor
, npp
o,
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
St7/
o4/
a4.
3en
cour
age
publ
ic p
rivat
e pa
rtne
rshi
p w
ith u
sers
of t
he
phyt
osan
itar
y se
rvic
en
ppo
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
priv
ate
Sect
or, n
ppo
, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
St7/
o4/
a4.
4D
evel
op a
nd p
rom
ote
case
stu
dies
of p
rivat
e se
ctor
/pu
blic
sec
tor c
olla
bora
tion
to a
chie
ve p
hyto
sani
tary
/
bio
secu
rity
/ m
arke
t acc
ess
obje
ctiv
es
StD
F, ip
pC
Sec
and
othe
rs
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, Rp
po, F
ao
, ip
pC S
ec
npp
o, F
ao
, WB,
Rp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, S
tDF
St7/
o5/
a5.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
of re
gion
al b
odie
s to
influ
ence
, ass
ist,
and
prom
ote
natio
nal
polic
y
Cre
ate
fora
for i
nter
chan
ge o
f exp
erie
nces
and
ski
lls o
n ph
ytos
anit
ary
advo
cacy
am
ong
regi
onal
org
aniz
atio
nsRp
po/i
ppC
Sec
Fao
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
StD
F, n
ppo
, WB,
Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, R
ppo
St7/
o5/
a5.
2U
tiliz
e ot
her i
nter
natio
nal f
ora
(e.g
. ape
C) t
o ad
voca
te
for n
atio
nal p
hyto
sani
tary
sys
tem
sRp
po/R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
za-
tions
ippC
Sec
StD
F, n
ppo
, WB,
Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, R
ppo
St7/
o5/
a5.
3C
ondu
ct b
asel
ine
stud
y of
Rpp
o re
leva
nce
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Fao
, npp
o, R
eCS
and
othe
r org
aniz
atio
ns
St7/
o6/
a6.
1en
hanc
ed t
he c
apac
ity
of c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s to
gen
erat
e, a
cces
s an
d re
trie
ve d
ata
and
info
rmat
ion
on a
dvoc
acy
Dev
elop
too
ls fo
r evi
denc
e ba
sed
advo
cacy
(eco
nom
ic
anal
ysis
, cos
t/be
nefit
, etc
)St
DF,
Fa
on
ppo
sRp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, i
FaD
, Fa
o, W
B, n
ppo
ong
oing
St7/
o6/
a6.
2Re
view
of c
urre
nt p
hyto
sani
tary
adv
ocac
y an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n do
cum
enta
tion
npp
o, i
ppC
Sec,
oth
er
orga
niza
-tio
ns
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
ippC
, Fa
o, W
B, S
tDF,
n
ppo
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, Rpp
o
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
8: M
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St8/
o1/a
1.1
mon
itor
ing
and
eval
uatio
n to
ols
deve
lope
d an
d us
ed
thro
ugho
ut t
he
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
gl
obal
phy
tosa
nita
ry
stra
tegy
at a
ll le
vels
iden
tify
exis
tenc
e an
d us
e of
m&
e to
ols
by c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s an
d ot
hers
ippC
Sec
npp
os
Don
ors
St8/
o1/a
1.2
m&
e to
ols
deve
lope
d or
ada
pted
,ip
pC S
ecn
ppo
s an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.3
Dev
elop
and
pop
ulat
e a
depo
sito
ry t
ool
ippC
Sec
npp
os
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.4
trai
ning
in u
se o
f m&
e to
ols
(incl
udin
g us
e of
the
de
posi
tory
)ip
pC S
ecD
onor
s
St8/
o1/a
1.5
ippC
sec
reta
riat (
and
othe
rs) p
rom
ote
use
of m
&e
and
depo
sito
ry t
ools
ippC
Se
c, n
p-po
s an
d ot
her
orga
ni-
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.7
adj
ust m
&e
tool
whe
n ne
cess
ary
ippC
Se
c,
npp
os
Don
ors,
inte
rest
ed
ng
os
St8/
o2/
a2.
1pe
riodi
c re
view
and
as
sess
men
t bei
ng
cond
ucte
d
part
ner w
ith le
adin
g or
gani
zatio
ns t
o co
nduc
t rev
iew
s an
d as
sess
men
tip
pC S
ecD
onor
s
St8/
o3/
a3
Con
tinua
l pro
cess
of
impr
ovem
ent (
adap
tive
m
anag
emen
t)
Shar
e re
view
resu
lts a
s ap
prop
riate
and
impl
emen
t co
rrect
ive
mea
sure
sip
pCD
onor
so
ngoi
ng
21
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
7: A
dvoc
acy
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St7/
o1/a
1.1
enha
nced
invo
lvem
ent
of t
he n
ppo
in
form
ulat
ing
rele
vant
na
tiona
l pol
icie
s
Dev
elop
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
; del
iver
tra
inin
g; e
valu
ate
trai
ning
impa
ct o
n po
licy
mul
tinat
ion-
al o
rgan
iza-
tions
Fao
. ipp
C Se
c.,
Rppo
/Re
CS
and
othe
r org
aniz
atio
ns
iFa
D, F
ao
, WB,
npp
o
St7/
o1/a
1.2
nat
iona
l and
regi
onal
men
torin
gn
ppo
/Rp
poip
pC S
ecn
ppo
/Rp
poC
ostin
g on
ly s
taff
requ
ired
by ip
pC S
ec
and
Rppo
St7/
o1/a
1.3
Con
duct
stu
dy o
f pol
icy
docu
men
ts fo
r pos
sibl
e im
pact
on
the
phy
tosa
nita
ry s
yste
mRp
po/R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
za-
tions
Fao
Rppo
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, iFa
D,
Fao
, WB,
npp
o
St7/
o2/
a2.
2en
hanc
ed n
ppo
ca
paci
ty t
o pr
omot
e th
eir o
wn
capa
city
de
velo
pmen
t nee
ds
Dev
elop
gui
delin
es fo
r phy
tosa
nita
ry c
apac
ity
build
ing
base
d on
par
is p
rinci
ples
ippC
Sec
Fao
, npp
os,
Rp
pos
StD
F,Fa
o,W
B
St7/
o3/
a3.
1n
ppo
s ha
ve b
ette
r ca
paci
ty t
o de
velo
p an
d im
plem
ent
com
mun
icat
ion/
advo
cacy
str
ateg
ies
Dev
elop
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
ippC
Sec
Fao
Fao
, WB,
iFa
D
Del
iver
tra
inin
gRp
pos,
ReC
S an
d ot
her o
rga-
niza
tions
expe
rt/
npp
o/
ippC
Sec
eval
uate
tra
inin
g im
pact
npp
oex
pert
St7/
o4/
a4.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
to
coor
dina
te n
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
enga
ge in
dust
ry a
nd o
ther
priv
ate
sect
or s
take
hold
ers
and
ng
os
npp
oRp
po/
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
priv
ate
Sect
or, n
ppo
, Rp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
St7/
o4/
a4.
2Fo
rmal
ize
regu
lar l
inka
ges
– br
idge
bui
ldin
g w
ith
cust
oms,
imm
igra
tion,
tra
de g
roup
s an
d pr
ivat
e se
ctor
npp
oRe
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
nspr
ivat
e Se
ctor
, npp
o,
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
St7/
o4/
a4.
3en
cour
age
publ
ic p
rivat
e pa
rtne
rshi
p w
ith u
sers
of t
he
phyt
osan
itar
y se
rvic
en
ppo
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
priv
ate
Sect
or, n
ppo
, Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
St7/
o4/
a4.
4D
evel
op a
nd p
rom
ote
case
stu
dies
of p
rivat
e se
ctor
/pu
blic
sec
tor c
olla
bora
tion
to a
chie
ve p
hyto
sani
tary
/
bio
secu
rity
/ m
arke
t acc
ess
obje
ctiv
es
StD
F, ip
pC
Sec
and
othe
rs
ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, Rp
po, F
ao
, ip
pC S
ec
npp
o, F
ao
, WB,
Rp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, S
tDF
St7/
o5/
a5.
1en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
of re
gion
al b
odie
s to
influ
ence
, ass
ist,
and
prom
ote
natio
nal
polic
y
Cre
ate
fora
for i
nter
chan
ge o
f exp
erie
nces
and
ski
lls o
n ph
ytos
anit
ary
advo
cacy
am
ong
regi
onal
org
aniz
atio
nsRp
po/i
ppC
Sec
Fao
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
StD
F, n
ppo
, WB,
Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, R
ppo
St7/
o5/
a5.
2U
tiliz
e ot
her i
nter
natio
nal f
ora
(e.g
. ape
C) t
o ad
voca
te
for n
atio
nal p
hyto
sani
tary
sys
tem
sRp
po/R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
za-
tions
ippC
Sec
StD
F, n
ppo
, WB,
Re
CS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, R
ppo
St7/
o5/
a5.
3C
ondu
ct b
asel
ine
stud
y of
Rpp
o re
leva
nce
ippC
Sec
npp
o, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Fao
, npp
o, R
eCS
and
othe
r org
aniz
atio
ns
St7/
o6/
a6.
1en
hanc
ed t
he c
apac
ity
of c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s to
gen
erat
e, a
cces
s an
d re
trie
ve d
ata
and
info
rmat
ion
on a
dvoc
acy
Dev
elop
too
ls fo
r evi
denc
e ba
sed
advo
cacy
(eco
nom
ic
anal
ysis
, cos
t/be
nefit
, etc
)St
DF,
Fa
on
ppo
sRp
po, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns, i
FaD
, Fa
o, W
B, n
ppo
ong
oing
St7/
o6/
a6.
2Re
view
of c
urre
nt p
hyto
sani
tary
adv
ocac
y an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n do
cum
enta
tion
npp
o, i
ppC
Sec,
oth
er
orga
niza
-tio
ns
Rppo
s, R
eCS
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
ippC
, Fa
o, W
B, S
tDF,
n
ppo
, ReC
S an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
, Rpp
o
Stra
tegi
c A
rea
8: M
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n
Act
ivit
y N
o.O
utpu
tSu
b-ac
tivi
ties
Lead
en
tity
Supp
orte
d by
Fund
ing
Opt
ions
Not
es/
Com
men
ts
St8/
o1/a
1.1
mon
itor
ing
and
eval
uatio
n to
ols
deve
lope
d an
d us
ed
thro
ugho
ut t
he
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
gl
obal
phy
tosa
nita
ry
stra
tegy
at a
ll le
vels
iden
tify
exis
tenc
e an
d us
e of
m&
e to
ols
by c
ontr
actin
g pa
rtie
s an
d ot
hers
ippC
Sec
npp
os
Don
ors
St8/
o1/a
1.2
m&
e to
ols
deve
lope
d or
ada
pted
,ip
pC S
ecn
ppo
s an
d ot
her
orga
niza
tions
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.3
Dev
elop
and
pop
ulat
e a
depo
sito
ry t
ool
ippC
Sec
npp
os
and
othe
r or
gani
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.4
trai
ning
in u
se o
f m&
e to
ols
(incl
udin
g us
e of
the
de
posi
tory
)ip
pC S
ecD
onor
s
St8/
o1/a
1.5
ippC
sec
reta
riat (
and
othe
rs) p
rom
ote
use
of m
&e
and
depo
sito
ry t
ools
ippC
Se
c, n
p-po
s an
d ot
her
orga
ni-
zatio
ns
Don
ors
St8/
o1/
a1.7
adj
ust m
&e
tool
whe
n ne
cess
ary
ippC
Se
c,
npp
os
Don
ors,
inte
rest
ed
ng
os
St8/
o2/
a2.
1pe
riodi
c re
view
and
as
sess
men
t bei
ng
cond
ucte
d
part
ner w
ith le
adin
g or
gani
zatio
ns t
o co
nduc
t rev
iew
s an
d as
sess
men
tip
pC S
ecD
onor
s
St8/
o3/
a3
Con
tinua
l pro
cess
of
impr
ovem
ent (
adap
tive
m
anag
emen
t)
Shar
e re
view
resu
lts a
s ap
prop
riate
and
impl
emen
t co
rrect
ive
mea
sure
sip
pCD
onor
so
ngoi
ng
i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y
IPPCthe international plant protection Convention (ippC) is an international plant health agreement that aims to protect cultivated and wild plants by preventing the introduction and spread of pests. international travel and trade are greater than ever before. as people and commodities move around the world, organisms that present risks to plants travel with them.
Organization + the number of contracting party signatories to the
Convention exceeds 177. + each contracting party has a national plant protection
organization (nppo) and an official ippC contact point. + 10 Regional plant protection organizations (Rppos) have
been established to coordinate nppos in various regions of the world.
+ ippC liaises with relevant international organizations to help build regional and national capacities.
+ the Secretariat is provided by the Food and agriculture organization of the United nations (Fao-Un).
International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
viale delle terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, italy
tel: +39 06 5705 4812 - Fax: +39 06 5705 4819
email: [email protected] - Web: www.ippc.int
the ippC Secretariat is hosted and provided by