iota carol - palm beach county,...

$: IOTA CAROL - Palm Beach County, Floridadiscover.pbcgov.org/pzb/planning/PDF/Amendments/DelrayLintonIota-Traffic.pdfk:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23$
IOTA CAROLCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

December 28, 2015Revised January 29, 2016Revised February 23, 2016

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTTRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Iota CarolPALM BEACH COUNTY, FL

Prepared for:Iota Carol, LLC

Prepared by:Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.West Palm Beach, Florida

140190000December 28, 2015January 29, 2016February 23, 2016CA 00000696Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.Suite 2001920 Wekiva WayWest Palm Beach, Florida 33411561/845-0665 TEL

_________________________________Christopher W. Heggen, P.E.Florida Registration Number 58636

Traffic Impact Analysis

k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc Page | i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1

SHORT-TERM (YEAR 2020) ANALYSIS ....................................................................................4

Trip Generation .......................................................................................................................4

Traffic Distribution and Assignment .........................................................................................5

Radius of Development Influence ............................................................................................5

Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service Analysis ..................................................................7

LONG-TERM (YEAR 2040) ANALYSIS ....................................................................................13

Trip Generation .....................................................................................................................13

Traffic Distribution and Assignment .......................................................................................14

Radius of Development Influence ..........................................................................................15

Long-Range Level of Service Analysis ..................................................................................17

CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................................19

APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS

APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS

APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS

APPENDIX D: YEAR 2040 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA

APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS (MINTO WEST,

AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE)

APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM


k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc Page | ii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Maximum Development Intensities Summary ................................................................2

Table 2: Trip Generation Potential: 5-Year Horizon .....................................................................4

Table 3A: Test 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis: AM Peak Hour ...........................................9

Table 3B: Test 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis: PM Peak Hour .........................................10

Table 4: Test 2 (Year 2020) LOS Analysis ............................................................................... 12

Table 5: Trip Generation Potential: Long-Term Horizon ............................................................14

Table 6: Long-Term (Year 2040) LOS Analysis ........................................................................18

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................3

Figure 2: Short-Term (Year 2020) Project Trip Distribution..........................................................6

Figure 3: Long-Term (Year 2040) Project Trip Distribution ........................................................16


k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc | Page 1

INTRODUCTION

Kimley-Horn has prepared a future land use plan amendment traffic analysis for the Iota Carol

site located north of 60th Street west of 190th Street in unincorporated Palm Beach County,

Florida. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. Iota Carol is made up of three

parcels, which currently have the Future Land Use (FLU) designation of RR-10. This application

is being filed to amend the Future Land Use plan to adopt a designation of RR-1.25 for the

project site. The Parcel Control Numbers (PCNs) for the site are listed below:

· 00-40-42-33-00-000-1010

· 00-40-42-28-00-000-9000

· 00-40-42-33-00-000-3010

Based on the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, the RR-10 designation allows a

maximum density of 1 residential unit per 10 acres. The RR-1.25 designation would allow a

maximum density of 1 residential units per 1.25 acres. In addition, commercial and civic

development are proposed for the site.

Table 1 summarizes the maximum development intensities assumed for the parcel based upon

the existing and proposed FLU designations.



Table 1Maximum Development Intensities

Scenario Acreage Maximum Intensity Maximum DevelopmentPotential

Existing FLU

RR-10 1,287.95 acres 1 unit / 10 acres 129 D.U.

Proposed FLU

RR-1.25 1,287.95 acres 1 unit /1.25 acres 1,030 D.U.

Commercial 112,000 S.F.

Civic 112,123 S.F.

This report summarizes the findings of the analysis that was conducted for the short-term and

long-term planning horizons based upon the criteria identified in Policy 3.5d of the Future Land

Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan.

LEGEND

SITE

FIGURE 1SITE LOCATION

IOTA CAROL140190000

SITE



SHORT-TERM (YEAR 2020) ANALYSIS

A short term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 2020. Because

full buildout of the project will take longer than this five-year planning horizon, this analysis

includes an evaluation of the impacts of development of 500 dwelling units (or the trip equivalent

thereof) for the site. This analysis has been conducted using the methodology for the Test 2

Level of Service Analyses as defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land

Development Code.

Trip GenerationThe trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach

County. Because the site is currently agricultural use, no credit for existing site traffic was

assumed in this analysis. For the future (five-year planning horizon) analysis, a development

potential of 500 dwelling units was assumed.

As indicated in Table 2, the 5-year maximum development potential under the proposed FLU for

this parcel is 5,000 new external daily trips, 375 new external AM peak-hour trips (94 in/281 out)

and 447 new external PM peak-hour trips (282 in/165 out).

Table 2Trip Generation Potential – Five-Year Horizon (Year 2020)

Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTrips Total In Out Total In Out

Proposed FLU Designation - 5 Year HorizonGross Trips

Single Family Detached 500 DU 5,000 375 94 281 447 282 165

Net New External Trips:5-Year Horizon 5,000 375 94 281 447 282 165Trip generation was calculated using the following data:

Daily Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =

AM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =

PM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =

T = .75 * Units (25% in / 75% out)

Ln(T) = .90 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out)

Land Use Intensity

T = 10 * Units



Traffic Distribution and Assignment

Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the

area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the

roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time

characteristics.

The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network

proposed to be in place for the 2020 analysis year. This assignment differs from the ultimate

long-range assignment, which accounts for future roadway connections to be built. Figure 2

illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network for the short-term

(Year 2020) analysis.

Radius of Development InfluenceBased upon the thresholds published in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County ULDC, the radius

of development influence for the peak hour volume of project traffic anticipated to be generated

in the 5-year planning horizon timeframe (447 trips) is two miles.

LEGENDSITE

ROAD NETWORK

PERCENT ASSIGNMENT

SITE

FIGURE 2FUTURE (2020) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

IOTA CAROL140190000

25% 30%

25%5%

30%

70%

35%

30%

XX%



Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service AnalysisSignificance was determined in accordance with the Test 2 (5-Year Analysis) LOS E peak-hour

peak-directional service volumes defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land

Development Code. The AM and PM peak hour project trips were assigned to the surrounding

roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate the project’s impact in comparison

to the LOS E adopted service volume. As defined in Article 12, Chapter B, Section 2(B), “The

existing road network and State and County Five-Year Road Program improvements with

construction scheduled to commence before the end of the Five-Year Analysis Period shall be

the Test 2 Road Network assumed in the analysis.” Therefore, the following road improvements

identified in the current Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in this

analysis:

· Northlake Boulevard, East of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road to East of Hall

Boulevard: Widening to 4 lanes (Construction in FY 2017)

· Northlake Boulevard, East of Hall Boulevard to Coconut Boulevard: Widening to 4

lanes (Construction in FY 2019)

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road: Orange Boulevard to South of Northlake Boulevard:

Widening to 4/6 lanes (Construction in FY 2017)

Relevant excerpts from the Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in

Appendix F.

Per Palm Beach County standards, roadway links inside the two-mile radius of development

influence are anticipated to be significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than

3% of the LOS E service volume, and links outside of that radius are anticipated to be

significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than 5% of the LOS E service

volume. As indicated in Tables 3A and 3B, the following roadway segments are significantly

impacted by the proposed FLU amendment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively:

AM Peak Hour

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Okeechobee Boulevard and

Northlake Boulevard

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between 60 th Street North and

Okeechobee Boulevard



· Okeechobee Boulevard, Eastbound, between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and F

Road

PM Peak Hour

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Southern Boulevard and 60 th

Street North

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between Northlake Boulevard and

Okeechobee Boulevard

· Okeechobee Boulevard, Westbound, between F Road and Seminole Pratt-Whitney

Road



Table 3ATest 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis (AM Peak Hour)

Project Traffic WithinPercent 2Impact miles?

Seminole Pratt Whitney RoadNorthlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 70 3.57% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 24 1.22% Yes NoTemple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 70 3.57% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 24 1.22% Yes NoOrange Boulevard 60th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 30% 84 4.29% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 30% 0% 28 1.43% Yes No60th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 70% 0% 66 7.50% Yes Yes

SB 2L Class I 880 0% 70% 197 22.39% Yes YesPersimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,960 70% 0% 66 3.37% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 70% 197 10.05% Yes YesSycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 70% 0% 66 2.44% Yes No

SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 0% 70% 197 7.30% Yes YesOkeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 35% 0% 33 1.68% No No

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 35% 98 5.00% No NoCoconut Boulevard

Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 28 3.18% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 9 1.02% No No

Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 28 3.18% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 9 1.02% No No

Northlake BoulevardSeminole Pratt-Whitney Road 140th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 70 3.57% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 24 1.22% No No140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 70 3.57% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 24 1.22% No NoCoconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 84 4.29% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 28 1.43% No NoIbis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 84 4.29% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 28 1.43% No NoSR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 0% 30% 84 2.23% No No

WB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 30% 0% 28 0.74% No NoOrange Boulevard

Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 140th avenue EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% Yes NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% Yes No

140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% No No

Coconut Boulevard 60th Street EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 14 1.59% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 5 0.57% No No

Okeechobee BoulevardSeminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 84 5.83% No Yes

WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 28 1.94% No NoB Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 84 5.83% No Yes

WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 28 1.94% No No

AM PEAK HOUR

SignificantImpact ??

% Assignment PeakHourTrips

From

LOS EServiceVolume Inbound

RoadwayDirection Facility Classification

Year 2020Laneage

OutboundTo



Table 3BTest 2 (Year 2020) Significance Analysis (PM Peak Hour)

Project Traffic WithinPercent 2Impact miles?

Seminole Pratt Whitney RoadNorthlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 41 2.09% Yes No

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 71 3.62% Yes YesTemple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 25% 41 2.09% Yes No

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 25% 0% 71 3.62% Yes YesOrange Boulevard 60th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 30% 50 2.55% Yes No

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 30% 0% 85 4.34% Yes Yes60th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 70% 0% 197 22.39% Yes Yes

SB 2L Class I 880 0% 70% 116 13.18% Yes YesPersimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,960 70% 0% 197 10.05% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 70% 116 5.92% Yes YesSycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 70% 0% 197 7.30% Yes Yes

SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,700 0% 70% 116 4.30% Yes YesOkeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,960 35% 0% 99 5.05% No Yes

SB 4LD Class I 1,960 0% 35% 58 2.96% No NoCoconut Boulevard

Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 17 1.93% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 28 3.18% No No

Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 880 0% 10% 17 1.93% No NoSB 2L Class I 880 10% 0% 28 3.18% No No

Northlake BoulevardSeminole Pratt-Whitney Road 140th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 41 2.09% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 71 3.62% No No140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 25% 41 2.09% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 25% 0% 71 3.62% No NoCoconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 50 2.55% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 85 4.34% No NoIbis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 1960 0% 30% 50 2.55% No No

WB 4LD Class I 1960 30% 0% 85 4.34% No NoSR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 0% 30% 50 1.33% No No

WB 4LD Uninterrupted 3760 30% 0% 85 2.26% No NoOrange Boulevard

Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 140th avenue EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% Yes NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% Yes No

140th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% No No

Coconut Boulevard 60th Street EB 2L Class I 880 0% 5% 8 0.91% No NoWB 2L Class I 880 5% 0% 14 1.59% No No

Okeechobee BoulevardSeminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 50 3.47% No No

WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 85 5.90% No YesB Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 0% 30% 50 3.47% No No

WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,440 30% 0% 85 5.90% No Yes

From To Inbound OutboundDirection

Year 2020Laneage

Facility ClassificationLOS E

ServiceVolume

SignificantImpact ??

% Assignment PeakHourTrips

PM PEAK HOUR

Roadway



Year 2020 capacity analyses were then performed on roadway segments that were determined

to be significantly impacted by project traffic. Background traffic was determined for all

significantly impacted roadways by applying the higher of either a 1 percent annual growth rate

plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance

Standards (TPS) database or the historical growth rate for the impacted segment, compounded

on an annual basis. In addition, traffic volumes from the Test 2 analysis for the currently

pending Indian Trails Grove application have been added to the background traffic calculation.

Project traffic was then added to determine future year 2020 volumes.

These total Year 2020 volumes were then compared to the LOS E generalized service volumes

for each significantly impacted roadway link. As indicated in Table 4, all significantly impacted

roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Therefore, no further analysis is required and

the proposed change in the FLU meets the Test 2 requirements of the Palm Beach County

Traffic Performance Standards.



Tabl

e4

Test

2(Y

ear2

020)

LOS

Ana

lyse

s

2015

Indi

an20

2020

20Ye

ar20

20Pe

akCo

mm

itted

Trai

ls1%

Hist

oric

alHi

stor

ical

Back

grou

ndPr

ojec

tTo

tal

Lane

age

Hour

Deve

lopm

ent

Gro

veG

row

thG

row

thG

row

thVo

lum

ePe

akHo

urVo

lum

eVo

lum

eTr

affic

Rate

Trip

s

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

adN

orth

lake

Boul

evar

dTe

mpl

eBo

ulev

ard

NB

4LD

Clas

sI1,

960

508

209

7026

4.59

%12

881

370

883

Yes

Tem

ple

Boul

evar

dO

rang

eBo

ulev

ard

NB

4LD

Clas

sI1,

960

508

209

7026

4.59

%12

881

370

883

Yes

Ora

nge

Boul

evar

d60

thSt

reet

NB

4LD

Clas

sI1,

960

664

384

8434

3.82

%13

711

6684

1,25

0Ye

s60

thSt

reet

Pers

imm

onBo

ulev

ard

NB

4LD

Clas

sII

1,87

085

646

366

442.

93%

133

1429

661,

495

Yes

SB4L

DCl

assI

I1,

870

793

387

197

402.

93%

123

1417

197

1,61

4Ye

sPe

rsim

mon

Boul

evar

dSy

cam

ore

Driv

eN

B4L

DCl

assI

1,96

085

646

366

442.

93%

133

1429

661,

495

Yes

SB4L

DCl

assI

1,96

079

338

719

740

2.93

%12

314

1719

71,

614

Yes

Syca

mor

eDr

ive

Oke

echo

bee

Boul

evar

dSB

4LD

Clas

sI/U

nint

erru

pted

2,70

095

137

019

749

1.00

%49

1567

197

1,76

4Ye

sO

keec

hobe

eBo

ulev

ard

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

adB

Road

EB2L

Unin

terr

upte

d1,

440

530

132

8427

1.00

%27

773

8485

7Ye

sB

Road

FRo

adEB

2LUn

inte

rrup

ted

1,44

053

013

284

271.

00%

2777

384

857

Yes

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

adN

orth

lake

Boul

evar

dTe

mpl

eBo

ulev

ard

SB4L

DCl

assI

1,96

052

726

470

274.

59%

133

888

7195

9Ye

sTe

mpl

eBo

ulev

ard

Ora

nge

Boul

evar

dSB

4LD

Clas

sI1,

960

527

264

7027

4.59

%13

388

871

959

Yes

Ora

nge

Boul

evar

d61

stSt

reet

SB4L

DCl

assI

1,96

066

547

485

343.

82%

137

1258

851,

343

Yes

60th

Stre

etPe

rsim

mon

Boul

evar

dN

B4L

DCl

assI

I1,

870

870

541

197

442.

93%

135

1652

197

1,84

9Ye

sSB

4LD

Clas

sII

1,87

062

697

011

632

2.93

%97

1744

116

1,86

0Ye

sPe

rsim

mon

Boul

evar

dSy

cam

ore

Driv

eN

B4L

DCl

assI

1,96

087

054

119

744

2.93

%13

516

5219

71,

849

Yes

SB4L

DCl

assI

1,96

062

697

011

632

2.93

%97

1744

116

1,86

0Ye

sSy

cam

ore

Driv

eO

keec

hobe

eBo

ulev

ard

NB

4LD

Clas

sI/U

nint

erru

pted

2,70

01,

035

540

197

531.

00%

5318

2519

72,

022

Yes

SB4L

DCl

assI

/Uni

nter

rupt

ed2,

700

545

903

116

281.

00%

2815

9211

61,

708

Yes

Oke

echo

bee

Boul

evar

dSo

uthe

rnBo

ulev

ard

NB

4LD

Clas

sI1,

960

840

494

9943

1.00

%43

1476

991,

575

Yes

Oke

echo

bee

Boul

evar

dSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Road

BRo

adW

B2L

Unin

terr

upte

d1,

440

528

167

8527

1.00

%27

807

8589

2Ye

sB

Road

FRo

adW

B2L

Unin

terr

upte

d1,

440

528

167

8527

1.00

%27

807

8589

2Ye

s

AMPE

AKHO

UR

PMPE

AKHO

UR

Belo

wLO

SE

Serv

ice

Volu

me?

From

To

Road

way

Dire

ctio

nFa

cilit

yCl

assi

ficat

ion

LOS

ESe

rvic

eVo

lum

e



LONG-TERM (YEAR 2040) ANALYSIS

A long-term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 2040. This

analysis includes an evaluation of the impacts of the full development potential of the site. This

analysis has been conducted using the criteria defined in Policy 3.5-d of the Future Land Use

Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan.

Trip GenerationThe trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach

County. The maximum development potential of the existing designation was calculated

assuming a maximum development intensity of 129 dwelling units. For the analysis of the future

proposed designation, a development potential of 1,030 dwelling units plus 112,000 square feet

of commercial use and 112,123 square feet of civic use was assumed.

As indicated in Table 5, the net change in trips for the maximum development potential under

the proposed FLU for this parcel is 13,375 new external daily trips, 789 new external AM peak-

hour trips (241 in/548 out) and 1,086 new external PM peak-hour trips (628 in/458 out).



Table 5Trip Generation Potential – Long-Term Horizon (Year 2040)

Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTrips Total In Out Total In Out

Current FLU DesignationGross Trips

Single Family Detached 129 DU 1,290 97 24 73 132 83 49

Net New External Trips: Existing FLU 1,290 97 24 73 132 83 49

Proposed FLU DesignationGross Trips

Single Family Detached 1,030 DU 10,300 773 193 580 857 540 317Church/Synagogue SF 1,021 63 39 24 62 30 32General Commercial SF 7,310 108 67 41 646 310 336

Subtotal 18,631 944 299 645 1,565 880 685

Internal Capture daily AM PMSingle Family Detached 6.49% 1.29% 6.77% 668 10 4 6 58 30 28Church/Synagogue 1.96% 0.00% 0.00% 20 0 0 0 0 0 0General Commercial 9.14% 9.30% 8.98% 668 10 6 4 58 28 30

1,356 20 10 10 116 58 58

Pass-byGeneral Commercial 39.3% 2,610 38 24 14 231 111 120

Net New External Trips: Proposed FLU 14,665 886 265 621 1,218 711 507

Net Change: Proposed FLU - Existing FLU 13,375 789 241 548 1,086 628 458Trip generation was calculated using the following data:

Daily Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 9.11 * SFGeneral Commercial PBC =

AM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 0.56 * SF (62% in / 38% out)General Commercial PBC =

PM Peak Hour Trip GenerationSingle Family detached PBC =Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 0.55 * SF (48% in / 52% out)General Commercial PBC =

T = 10 * Units

Intensity

112,123112,000

T = .65*Ln(SF/1000)+5.83

Land Use

Ln(T) = .67* LN(SF/1000)+.3.31 / 1,000 sq. ft. (48% in / 52% out)

Ln(T) = .90 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out)

T = .96 * SF (62% in / 38% out)

T = .75 * Units (25% in / 75% out)

Traffic Distribution and AssignmentTraffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the

area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the

roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time

characteristics.

The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network

proposed to be in place for the 2040 analysis year. The assignment for this analysis includes



the overall cost-feasible roadway network. Figure 3 illustrates the project traffic assignment to

the surrounding roadway network for the long-term (Year 2040) analysis.

Radius of Development InfluenceBased upon the thresholds published in Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Future Land

Use Plan, the radius of development influence for the daily volume of project traffic anticipated

to be generated in the long-range planning horizon timeframe (13,375 trips) is four miles.

LEGEND

SITE

21% 22%

21%

7%

11%

38%

15%

8%

FIGURE 3FUTURE (2040) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

IOTA CAROL140190000

1%

9%

34% 24%

28%

7%

5%

SITE

ROAD NETWORK PERCENT ASSIGNMENT

FUTURE ROAD NETWORK

XX%



Long-Range Level of Service AnalysisSignificance was determined in accordance with the Daily LOS D service volumes defined in

Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. The daily project trips

were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate

the project’s impact in comparison to the LOS D adopted service volume. As indicated in Table

6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment

in the long range analysis:

· Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road between Northlake Boulevard and Southern Boulevard

· Northlake Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Ibis Road

· Orange Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and 60 th Street North

· 60th Street North between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm Beach

Boulevard

· Persimmon Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm

Beach Boulevard

· Okeechobee Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Folsom Road

An analysis was then conducted to evaluate long-range level of service on these roadways. For

the baseline analysis, the Year 2040 volumes published by the Palm Beach County

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) were utilized. Traffic generated by the approved

Minto West and Avenir projects and the currently pending Indian Trails Grove project were then

added along with traffic from this proposed FLU change in order to determine total Year 2040

volumes. The analysis results are shown in Table 6. As shown in this tables, several roadway

segments within the study area are not projected to meet the adopted level of service

standards.



Tabl

e6

Long

-Ter

m(Y

ear2

040)

LOS

Ana

lyse

s

2040

Indi

anTr

ails

Perc

ent

MPO

Mod

elM

into

Wes

tAv

enir

Gro

ve20

40Vo

lum

eTr

affic

Traf

ficTr

affic

TOTA

LTR

AFFI

Cv/

cSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Road

Nor

thla

keBo

ulev

ard

Tem

ple

Boul

evar

d4L

Clas

sI33

,200

21%

3,08

09.

28%

Yes

31,0

005,

546

5,81

72,

970

48,4

1314

5.8%

Tem

ple

Boul

evar

dO

rang

eBo

ulev

ard

4LCl

assI

33,2

0021

%3,

080

9.28

%Ye

s31

,000

5,54

65,

817

2,97

048

,413

145.

8%O

rang

eBo

ulev

ard

60th

Stre

et4L

Clas

sI33

,200

11%

1,61

34.

86%

Yes

28,6

007,

487

5,52

64,

667

47,8

9314

4.3%

60th

Stre

etSy

cam

ore

Driv

e4L

Clas

sI33

,200

38%

5,57

316

.79%

Yes

38,1

0010

,538

4,65

416

,122

74,9

8722

5.9%

Syca

mor

eDr

ive

Oke

echo

bee

Boul

evar

d4L

Clas

sI33

,200

28%

4,10

612

.37%

Yes

39,0

009,

151

4,07

212

,728

69,0

5720

8.0%

Oke

echo

bee

Boul

evar

dSo

uthe

rnBo

ulev

ard

4LCl

assI

33,2

0015

%2,

200

6.63

%Ye

s22

,300

6,10

12,

036

6,36

439

,001

117.

5%

Coco

nutB

oule

vard

Nor

thla

keBl

vdO

rang

eBo

ulev

ard

2LCl

assI

15,2

001%

147

0.97

%N

o10

,900

1,38

74,

654

424

17,5

1211

5.2%

Ora

nge

Boul

evar

dPe

rsim

mon

Blvd

2LCl

assI

15,2

001%

147

0.97

%N

o4,

400

555

2,32

742

47,

853

51.7

%N

orth

lake

Blvd

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

ad14

0th

Aven

ue4L

Clas

sII

3320

021

%3,

080

9.28

%Ye

s19

,500

4,43

76,

981

8,91

042

,908

129.

2%14

0th

Aven

ueCo

conu

tBou

leva

rd4L

Clas

sII

3320

022

%3,

226

9.72

%Ye

s32

,200

4,43

758

28,

910

49,3

5514

8.7%

Coco

nutB

oule

vard

(Roy

alPa

lmBe

ach

Blvd

)Ib

isRo

ad4L

Clas

sII

3320

022

%3,

226

9.72

%Ye

s34

,000

5,54

634

,612

9,33

486

,718

261.

2%O

rang

eBo

ulev

ard

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

ad14

0th

Aven

ue2L

Clas

sI15

,200

9%1,

320

8.68

%Ye

s10

,000

832

291

3,81

816

,261

107.

0%14

0th

Aven

ueCo

conu

tBou

leva

rd2L

Clas

sI15

,200

7%1,

027

6.76

%Ye

s9,

800

693

1,74

52,

970

16,2

3510

6.8%

Coco

nutB

oule

vard

(Roy

alPa

lmBe

ach

Blvd

)60

thSt

reet

2LCl

assI

15,2

005%

733

4.82

%Ye

s12

,400

03,

490

2,12

118

,744

123.

3%60

thSt

reet

Nor

thSe

min

ole-

Prat

tWhi

tney

Road

140t

hAv

enue

2LCl

assI

15,2

0034

%4,

986

32.8

0%Ye

s10

,900

058

25,

940

22,4

0814

7.4%

140t

hAv

enue

Roya

lPal

mBe

ach

Blvd

2LCl

assI

15,2

0024

%3,

520

23.1

6%Ye

s10

,900

4,43

787

36,

364

26,0

9417

1.7%

Pers

imm

onBo

ulev

ard

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

ad14

0th

Aven

ue2L

Clas

sI15

,200

5%73

34.

82%

Yes

7,40

04,

992

291

2,12

115

,537

102.

2%

140t

hAv

enue

Roya

lPal

mBe

ach

Blvd

2LCl

assI

15,2

005%

733

4.82

%Ye

s19

,700

4,57

629

12,

121

27,4

2118

0.4%

Oke

echo

bee

Blvd

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyRo

adB

Road

2LCl

assI

3320

08%

1,17

33.

53%

Yes

23,5

002,

773

1,74

53,

394

32,5

8598

.1%

BRo

adFo

lsom

Road

2LCl

assI

3320

07%

1,02

73.

09%

Yes

30,2

002,

773

873

2,97

037

,843

114.

0%

Road

way

Lane

sFa

cilit

yCl

assi

ficat

ion

LOS

DSe

rvic

eVo

lum

ePe

rcen

tIm

pact

Sign

ifica

ntIm

pact

??Io

taCa

rol

Daily

Trip

sFr

omTo

Assi

gnm

ent



CONCLUSION

The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the

proposed future land use change from for the Iota Carol site located in unincorporated Palm

Beach County. The proposed plan will convert the existing RR-10 designation on the site to RR

1.25 with Commercial and Civic uses. Based on the analyses conducted for the short-term and

long-term planning horizons, the adopted level of service standards are anticipated to still be

met on any roadways significantly impacted by project traffic during the short range (Test 2-Five

Year, Year 2020) analysis. The Year 2040 analysis indicates that some of the significantly

impacted roadways segments will not meet the adopted level of service criteria; however, this

analysis was based upon MPO model data using the Year 2040 cost feasible plan. It is noted

that the analysis includes traffic volumes generated by the approved Minto West and Avenir

projects as well as the proposed Indian Trails Grove project, all of which will be providing

roadway impact fee and proportionate share payments that may be applied toward further

improvements in this area. Additionally, this project will be subject to roadway impact fee and

proportionate share payments that will provide for further improvements on the transportation

network in the surrounding area. Full details will be determined in the process of the Traffic

Performance Standards (TPS) analysis for this site.



APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS

Kim ley>>> Horn

Location Address

Municipality UNINCORPORATED

Parcel Control Number 00-40-42-33-00-000-1010

Subdivision

Official Records Book 25973 Page 1381

Sale Date APR-2013

Legal Description33-42-40, ALL OF SEC A/K/A TRS1 THUR 56 PALM BEACH CITRUS FARMS ASIN OR3251 P318 (LESS NLY 1094.96 FT OF SLY 4129.41 FT

Owners

IOTA CAROL LLC

Mailing address

4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 1550

NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2042

Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner

APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCJAN-2003 $10,170,000 14782 / 0958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLCNOV-2002 $10 14505 / 0426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR &FEB-2002 $10 13623 / 0103 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TRAPR-1990 $3,036,000 06422 / 0290 WARRANTY DEED

12

No Exemption Information Available.

Number of Units 0 *Total Square Feet 0 Acres 583.10

Use Code5100 - AG Classification CROPSOIL CLASS 1

ZoningAR - Agricultural Residential ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Improvement Value $0 $0 $0

Land Value $6,997,200 $6,997,200 $6,997,200

Total Market Value $6,997,200 $6,997,200 $6,997,200

All values are as of January 1st each year

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Assessed Value $757,650 $757,650 $759,985

Exemption Amount $0 $0 $0

Taxable Value $757,650 $757,650 $759,985

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Ad Valorem $14,088 $14,244 $14,336

Non Ad Valorem $32,298 $32,298 $32,698

Total tax $46,386 $46,542 $47,034

Page 1 of 1

12/23/2015http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Asps/PropertyDetail/PropertyDetail.aspx?parcel=00404233...

Location Address



Subdivision


Sale Date APR-2013

Legal Description33-42-40, NLY 1094.96 FT OF SLY 4129.41 FT OF ELY 730 FT OF WLY1888.41 FT, NLY 1497.52FT OF SLY 3049.37 FT OF ELY 820

Owners

IOTA CAROL LLC

Mailing address




APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCJAN-2003 $10,170,000 14782 / 0958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLCNOV-2002 $10 14505 / 0426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR &APR-1990 $6,000,000 06422 / 0291 WARRANTY DEEDJUL-1988 $550,000 05766 / 0389 WARRANTY DEED



Use Code5100 - AG Classification CROPSOIL CLASS 1

ZoningAR - Agricultural Residential ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Improvement Value $94,381 $97,000 $90,531

Land Value $756,480 $756,480 $756,480

Total Market Value $850,861 $853,480 $847,011


Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Assessed Value $283,441 $286,060 $268,791


Taxable Value $283,441 $286,060 $268,791

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Ad Valorem $5,270 $5,378 $5,070

Non Ad Valorem $4,180 $4,184 $4,178

Total tax $9,450 $9,562 $9,248

Page 1 of 1


Location Address



Subdivision


Sale Date APR-2013

Legal Description 28-42-40, ALL

Owners

IOTA CAROL LLC

Mailing address




APR-2013 $2,900,100 25973 / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLCSEP-2003 $10 15855 / 1578 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLCAPR-2003 $11,680,000 15157 / 0756 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLCAPR-2003 $10 15042 / 0839 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES LLLPJUL-2001 $10 12741 / 0374 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES

12



Use Code6000 - AG ClassificationGRAGSOIL CLASS 1

ZoningAP - Agricultural Production ( 00-UNINCORPORATED )

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Improvement Value $0 $0 $0

Land Value $7,701,600 $7,701,600 $6,738,900

Total Market Value $7,701,600 $7,701,600 $6,738,900


Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Assessed Value $514,499 $509,912 $720,680


Taxable Value $514,499 $509,912 $720,680

Tax Year 2015 2014 2013

Ad Valorem $9,566 $9,587 $13,595

Non Ad Valorem $35,949 $35,949 $35,949

Total tax $45,515 $45,536 $49,544

Page 1 of 1



k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\2016-02-23 iota carol cpa.doc

APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS

ROAD NAME: Report Created: 12/21/2015CURRENT YEAR:ANALYSIS YEAR:GROWTH RATE:

Time PeriodDirection 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WBExisting Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Peak Volume 987 508 535 1062 535 527Diversion(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0Volume after Diversion 987 508 535 1062 535 527

Committed Developments Type % CompleteSeminole Orange Plaza 30 14 16 61 31 30 NR 28%Planet Kids IX - SPW 28 15 13 28 13 15 NR 0%Minto West 276 135 141 553 383 169 NR 0%Avenir 117 60 57 154 87 67 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 451 224 227 796 514 281Total Committed Residential 117 60 57 154 87 67Total Committed Non-Residential 334 164 170 642 427 214Double Count Reduction 29 15 14 39 22 17

Total Discounted Committed Developments 422 209 213 757 492 264

Historical Growth 248 128 135 267 135 133Comm Dev+1% Growth 472 235 240 811 519 291Growth Volume Used 472 235 240 811 519 291Total Volume 1459 743 775 1873 1054 818

LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

2L

2020 TO: Midpoint4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015

Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 24062015 FROM: Orange Blvd



Committed Developments Type % CompleteSeminole Orange Plaza 30 14 16 61 31 30 NR 28%Planet Kids IX - SPW 28 15 13 28 13 15 NR 0%Minto West 276 135 141 553 383 169 NR 0%Avenir 117 60 57 154 87 67 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 451 224 227 796 514 281Total Committed Residential 117 60 57 154 87 67Total Committed Non-Residential 334 164 170 642 427 214Double Count Reduction 29 15 14 39 22 17



LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YESLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES

2L

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

2020 TO: Northlake Blvd4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015

2015 FROM: Midpoint

Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 2406



Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 373 182 191 746 517 229 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 94 48 45 123 69 54 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 785 430 354 1305 781 523Total Committed Residential 319 201 117 364 167 197Total Committed Non-Residential 466 229 237 941 614 326Double Count Reduction 80 46 29 91 42 49



LanesLOS D Capacity 3220 1960 1960 3220 1960 1960Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YESLOS E Capacity 3400 1960 1960 3400 1960 1960Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

4LD

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

2020 TO: Orange Blvd3.82% COUNT DATE: 1/20/2015

Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 24082015 FROM: 60th St N







Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34422015 FROM: Sycamore Dr2020 TO: Persimmon Blvd2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

4LD







Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34422015 FROM: Persimmon Blvd2020 TO: 60th St N2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

4LD

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM



Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 225 153 72 241 98 143 Res 0%Seminole Orange Plaza 40 21 19 82 40 41 NR 28%Minto West 456 233 223 912 280 632 NR 0%Groves Town Center 22 5 17 77 44 32 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 53 26 27 113 57 56 NR 0%Avenir 82 42 40 108 61 47 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 878 480 398 1533 580 951Total Committed Residential 307 195 112 349 159 190Total Committed Non-Residential 571 285 286 1184 421 761Double Count Reduction 77 49 28 87 40 48



LanesLOS D Capacity 1480 1140 1140 1480 1140 1140Link Meets Test 1? NO YES NO NO NO NOLOS E Capacity 1570 1440 1440 1570 1440 1440Link Meets Test 2? NO YES YES NO NO NO

Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34242015 FROM: Okeechobee Blvd2020 TO: Sycamore Dr0% COUNT DATE: 3/9/2015

2L

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM



Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 305 208 97 327 133 194 Res 0%Minto West 304 155 148 608 186 422 NR 0%Bink's Corporate Center 6 3 3 21 11 10 NR 15%Groves Town Center 30 7 23 102 59 43 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 70 35 36 150 76 74 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 69 9 60 88 40 47 NR 0%Avenir 41 21 20 54 30 24 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 825 438 387 1350 535 814Total Committed Residential 346 229 117 381 163 218Total Committed Non-Residential 479 209 270 969 372 596Double Count Reduction 87 42 29 95 41 55




Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34202015 FROM: Southern Blvd2020 TO: Midpoint0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

4LD



Committed Developments Type % CompleteArden PUD 305 208 97 327 133 194 Res 0%Minto West 304 155 148 608 186 422 NR 0%Bink's Corporate Center 6 3 3 21 11 10 NR 15%Groves Town Center 30 7 23 102 59 43 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 70 35 36 150 76 74 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 69 9 60 88 40 47 NR 0%Avenir 41 21 20 54 30 24 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 825 438 387 1350 535 814Total Committed Residential 346 229 117 381 163 218Total Committed Non-Residential 479 209 270 969 372 596Double Count Reduction 87 42 29 95 41 55




Input DataSeminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 34202015 FROM: Midpoint2020 TO: Okeechobee Blvd0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

4LD

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM



Committed Developments Type % CompletePalms West Medical 0 0 0 1 0 0 NR 92%Palms West Hospital 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 95%Arden PUD 80 55 26 86 35 51 Res 0%Southern Palm Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 100%Fox DRI 1 1 1 3 1 1 NR 94%Tract 115-Village Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0%Minto West 138 67 71 276 192 85 NR 0%Groves Town Center 4 1 3 15 9 6 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 11 5 5 23 11 11 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 8 1 7 11 5 6 NR 0%Avenir 35 17 18 46 20 26 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 277 147 131 461 273 186Total Committed Residential 115 72 44 132 55 77Total Committed Non-Residential 162 75 87 329 218 109Double Count Reduction 29 15 11 33 14 19




Input DataOkeechobee Blvd STATION: 34192015 FROM: MIDPOINT2020 TO: E Rd0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM

2L



Committed Developments Type % CompletePalms West Medical 0 0 0 1 0 0 NR 92%Palms West Hospital 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 95%Arden PUD 80 55 26 86 35 51 Res 0%Southern Palm Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 100%Fox DRI 1 1 1 3 1 1 NR 94%Tract 115-Village Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0%Minto West 138 67 71 276 192 85 NR 0%Groves Town Center 3 2 1 10 4 6 NR 0%Loxahatchee Groves Commons 7 4 3 15 7 8 NR 0%Palm Beach State College 6 5 1 7 4 3 NR 0%Avenir 35 17 18 46 20 26 Res 0%Total Committed Developments 270 151 121 444 263 180Total Committed Residential 115 72 44 132 55 77Total Committed Non-Residential 155 79 77 312 208 103Double Count Reduction 29 16 11 33 14 19




Input DataOkeechobee Blvd STATION: 34192015 FROM: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd2020 TO: MIDPOINT0% COUNT DATE: 1/12/2015

2L

PSF: 1Link Analysis

AM PM



APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS

Project Number:Project Name: IOTA CAROL

Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _ , Daily_ X , AM _ .

Single Family Detached Analyst:ITE LUC: 210 Date: 12/21/2015

Size: 1,030 DUTotal Internal External

Enter from External: 4,816 Enter 5,150 334 4,816Exit to External: 4,816 Exit 5,150 334 4,816

Total 10,300 668 9,632% 100% 6% 94% 9.0% 464 Demand

Demand 1.0% 52 329 BalancedBalanced 5 9.0% 329 Demand

Demand 1.0% 5 Demand 9.0% 4641.0% 52 Demand Balanced 329

5 Balanced Demand 9.0% 329Church/Synagogue 1.0% 5 Demand Land Use C: General Commercial

ITE LUC: 560 ITE LUC: 820Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112,000 SF

Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:501 Enter 511 10 501 1.0% 5 5 1.0% 37 Enter 3655 334 3321 3,321500 Exit 510 10 500 Exit 3,655 334 3321 3,321

Exit to External: Total 1021 20 1001 Total 7310 668 6642 Exit to External:% 100% 2% 98% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%

1.0% 5 5 1.0% 37

NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT

Land UseA B C Total

Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial4,816 501 3,321 8,6384,816 500 3,321 8,6379,632 1,001 6,642 17,275

10,300 1,021 7,310 18,631File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_daily 6.49% 1.96% 9.14%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.28%

EnterExitTotal

Single Use Trip Gen Estimate

ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET(ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook , 2nd Edition, June 2004)

Task Number:

Land Use A:

Land Use B:

Category


Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _ , Daily_ , AM _X .



Enter from External: 189 Enter 193 4 189Exit to External: 574 Exit 580 6 574

Total 773 10 763% 100% 1% 99% 9.0% 17 Demand





Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:39 Enter 39 0 39 1.0% 0 0 1.0% 1 Enter 67 6 60.6624 6124 Exit 24 0 24 Exit 41 4 36.8576 37

Exit to External: Total 63 0 63 Total 107.52 10 97.52 Exit to External:% 100% 0% 100% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%

1.0% 0 0 1.0% 0


Land UseA B C Total

Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial189 39 61 289574 24 37 635763 63 98 924

773 63 108 944File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_am 1.29% 0.00% 9.30%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 2.12%

EnterExitTotal



Task Number:

Land Use A:

Land Use B:

Category


Scenario: Proposed FLU DesignationAnalysis Period: PM _X , Daily_ , AM _ .



Enter from External: 510 Enter 540 30 510Exit to External: 289 Exit 317 28 289

Total 857 58 799% 100% 7% 93% 9.0% 49 Demand





Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External:30 Enter 30 0 30 1.0% 0 0 1.0% 3 Enter 310 28 282.08 28232 Exit 32 0 32 Exit 336 30 305.92 306

Exit to External: Total 62 0 62 Total 646 58 588 Exit to External:% 100% 0% 100% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 9% 91%

1.0% 0 0 1.0% 3


Land UseA B C Total

Single Family DetachedChurch/SynagogueGeneral Commercial510 30 282 822289 32 306 627799 62 588 1,449

857 62 646 1,565File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\1401\140190000- iota carol\iota documents\[trip gen iota carol.xls]ic_pm 6.77% 0.00% 8.98%Print Date = 12/28/15Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.41%

EnterExitTotal



Task Number:

Land Use A:

Land Use B:

Category



APPENDIX D: YEAR 2040 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e46

772N

DAV

EN

WLa

keW

orth

Rd

Con

gres

sAv

ePB

C2

7,29

55,

594

6,25

69,

300

7,80

046

792N

DAV

EN

WC

ongr

ess

Ave

Bout

wel

lRd

PBC

25,

816

4,12

74,

517

9,10

07,

300

6890

4TH

AVE

(NW

)4

Dia

gona

lNW

Palm

etto

Par

kR

dB

R2

8,50

78,

306

10,6

6010

,100

8,30

068

264T

HA

VE(N

W)

Gla

des

Rd

4D

iago

nalN

WB

R2

8,68

18,

558

9,81

39,

700

10,5

0068

204T

HA

VE(N

W)

20th

StN

WG

lade

sR

dB

R2

7,63

18,

853

9,94

38,

600

10,1

0068

424T

HA

VE(S

W)

Palm

etto

Par

kR

dC

amin

oR

eal

BR

26,

108

6,00

67,

489

9,90

07,

600

6894

5TH

AVE

NE

Fede

ralH

wy

Sof

Fede

ralH

wy

BR

26,

834

5,97

17,

323

7,80

06,

900

6892

5TH

AVE

NW

Span

ish

Riv

erBl

vdN

W20

thSt

BR

25,

875

6,39

08,

422

13,5

009,

800

4631

6TH

AVE

SC

ongr

ess

Ave

Suns

etA

vePB

C4D

31,6

0428

,972

29,4

8040

,600

39,0

0042

056T

HA

VES

Suns

etA

veI-9

5PB

C4D

32,1

2537

,165

33,1

9539

,600

45,9

0043

076T

HA

VES

I-95

SR80

5(D

ixie

Hw

y)PB

C4D

27,9

9026

,868

27,8

9635

,900

33,2

0068

409T

HA

VE(S

W)

Palm

etto

Par

kR

dSW

13th

St

BR

22,

929

2,23

22,

412

2,20

03,

700

6883

10TH

AVE

Gla

des

Rd

NW

15th

StB

R2

8,93

56,

615

10,3

0810

,400

7,90

046

4310

THA

VEN

Jog

Rd

Hav

erhi

llR

dPB

C4D

16,9

4014

,782

14,2

7221

,700

23,3

0046

0110

THA

VEN

Hav

erhi

llR

dM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

521

,367

21,8

19N

/A25

,600

27,9

0046

0310

THA

VEN

Milit

ary

TrKi

rkR

dPB

C5

27,8

3726

,022

26,7

0535

,200

35,1

0046

5310

THA

VEN

Kirk

Rd

Con

gres

sAv

ePB

C5

33,1

3130

,129

31,9

9642

,800

39,6

0042

0310

THA

VEN

Con

gres

sAv

eI-9

5PB

C5

42,8

1044

,530

44,4

4150

,500

53,9

0043

0310

THA

VEN

I-95

'A'S

tPB

C5

33,6

4830

,251

33,2

5238

,900

33,2

0048

0510

THA

VEN

'A'S

tU

S1

PBC

521

,903

20,1

4921

,813

23,6

0021

,900

6896

12TH

AVE

Cam

ino

Gar

dens

Blv

d18

thS

tSW

BR

28,

052

6,77

67,

705

11,0

008,

300

6856

12TH

AVE

Palm

etto

Par

kR

d13

thS

tSW

BR

211

,579

10,6

0614

,119

17,5

0012

,700

6830

12TH

AVE

Nof

Pal

met

toPa

rkR

dPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

BR

421

,072

18,1

7521

,863

22,8

000

4309

12TH

AVE

S'A

'Ave

Lake

Osb

orne

Dr

LW2

6,41

76,

042

5,31

46,

600

6,60

068

2913

THS

TG

lade

sR

d10

thA

veN

WB

R4D

16,5

5612

,815

13,6

0718

,800

14,2

0068

9815

THA

VEG

lade

sR

dN

W7t

hSt

BR

213

,332

13,3

8415

,758

15,8

0013

,500

4301

17TH

AVE

N'A

'Ave

NPi

netre

eLn

LW2

1,86

31,

701

1,58

92,

200

2,20

068

1920

THS

T5t

hA

veN

WFA

UB

R4D

5,87

86,

695

9,02

13,

200

7,80

068

2320

THS

TU

S1

Old

Dix

ieH

wy

BR

4D11

,679

10,8

6512

,128

12,0

0010

,900

5621

23R

DAV

EM

ilitar

yTr

EC

ount

ryR

dPB

C2

11,4

1011

,294

11,6

4012

,000

13,0

0056

1723

RD

AVE

EC

ount

ryR

dC

ongr

ess

Ave

PBC

213

,036

13,0

5013

,698

14,0

0015

,100

5603

23R

DAV

EC

ongr

ess

Ave

I-95

PBC

214

,227

13,3

4113

,562

15,0

0016

,000

5305

23R

DAV

EI-9

5Se

acre

stB

lvd

PBC

215

,920

14,5

0612

,827

16,5

0016

,900

5811

23R

DAV

ESe

acre

stB

lvd

US-

1PB

C2

9,25

48,

556

8,63

89,

100

10,2

0038

0525

THS

TTa

mar

ind

Ave

Aust

ralia

nAv

eW

PB

210

,898

N/A

N/A

13,1

0013

,200

3803

36TH

ST

Broa

dway

(WPB

)Au

stra

lian

Ave

WP

B2

9,47

8N

/AN

/A11

,200

6,80

032

0145

THS

TJo

gR

dH

aver

hill

Rd

PBC

25,

839

4,39

25,

322

24,7

009,

700

3607

45TH

ST

Hav

erhi

llR

dM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

6D27

,729

24,8

9226

,349

45,2

0040

,600

3665

45TH

ST

Milit

ary

TrVi

llage

Blvd

PBC

6D44

,965

39,0

9639

,648

59,6

0053

,700

3203

45TH

ST

Villa

geBl

vdI-9

5PB

C6D

52,8

8055

,134

59,1

0967

,300

72,6

0033

0145

THS

TI-9

5C

ongr

ess

Ave

PBC

8D56

,431

53,3

3355

,715

67,0

000

3843

45TH

ST

Con

gres

sAv

eAu

stra

lian

Ave

PBC

6D47

,616

42,3

6744

,996

51,7

0050

,100

3801

45TH

ST

Aust

ralia

nAv

eG

reen

woo

dAv

ePB

C4D

30,5

2925

,475

26,9

9728

,900

26,5

0038

4545

THS

TG

reen

woo

dAv

eBr

oadw

ay(W

PB)

PBC

315

,819

12,7

1713

,442

15,0

0014

,800

6748

1088

460

THST

Sem

inol

eP

ratt

Whi

tney

Rd

140t

hAv

eN

PBC

2N

/AN

/AN

/A10

,900

9,20

062

1582

ND

STC

ongr

ess

Ave

I-95

BR

4D21

,753

20,7

9323

,867

24,1

0026

,300

Palm

BeachMPO

2040

CostFeasibleVo

lumes

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

1of

20

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e12

06C

EN

TRA

LBL

VD

Don

ald

Ros

sR

dFr

eder

ick

Smal

lRd

PBC

4D15

,708

16,6

8216

,806

32,8

0030

,800

1614

CE

NTR

AL

BLV

DFr

eder

ick

Smal

lRd

Indi

anC

reek

Pkw

yPB

C4D

10,9

5412

,750

13,2

5025

,400

21,9

0016

06C

EN

TRA

LBL

VD

Indi

anC

reek

Pkw

yIn

dian

tow

nR

dPB

C4D

27,2

1726

,285

23,6

9930

,200

19,8

0016

12C

EN

TRA

LBL

VD

Indi

anto

wn

Rd

Chu

rch

St

PBC

219

,245

13,0

3415

,331

20,8

0015

,800

6403

CLI

NT

MO

OR

ER

DSR

7Ly

ons

Rd

PBC

4D13

,291

15,1

4816

,612

17,8

0018

,000

6201

CLI

NT

MO

OR

ER

DLy

ons

Rd

Jog

Rd

PBC

4D21

,809

21,5

2523

,563

27,1

0029

,500

6607

CLI

NT

MO

OR

ER

DJo

gR

dM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

4D29

,949

28,7

6730

,162

38,7

0034

,500

6601

CLI

NT

MO

OR

ER

DM

ilitar

yTr

Con

gres

sAv

eB

R6D

30,7

3729

,298

26,1

5133

,800

32,6

0063

01C

LIN

TM

OO

RE

RD

Con

gres

sAv

eN

W2n

dAv

eB

R4D

13,7

1210

,637

11,0

2514

,700

11,1

0021

04C

OC

ON

UT

BLVD

Pers

imm

onBl

Ora

nge

BlPB

C2

3,98

62,

791

2,83

34,

400

4,20

024

12C

OC

ON

UT

BLVD

Ora

nge

BlTe

mpl

eBl

vdPB

C2

13,3

6510

,796

11,1

8110

,900

12,8

0024

04C

OC

ON

UT

BLVD

Tem

ple

Blvd

Nor

thla

keBl

vdPB

C2

14,1

0411

,665

11,6

327,

700

13,4

0036

41C

OM

MU

NIT

YD

RH

aver

hill

Rd

Milit

ary

TrPB

C5

16,2

0615

,110

13,8

3916

,200

17,9

0036

59C

OM

MU

NIT

YD

RM

ilitar

yTr

Villa

geBl

vdPB

C3

17,2

0415

,076

16,6

9821

,100

16,7

0066

14C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Yam

ato

Rd

Clin

tMoo

reR

dB

R6D

25,1

9825

,740

26,1

2532

,800

31,3

0066

44C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Clin

tMoo

reR

dN

W82

ndSt

BR

6D28

,805

28,3

0031

,979

41,3

0033

,900

6204

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EN

W82

ndSt

Lint

onBl

vdB

R6D

24,6

6517

,757

19,8

4032

,600

25,9

0056

50C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Lint

onBl

vdLo

wso

nBl

vdPB

C6D

26,9

6523

,248

24,0

5633

,600

30,0

0056

12C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Low

son

Blvd

Atla

ntic

Ave

PBC

6D30

,312

26,1

5127

,833

36,0

0030

,900

5630

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EAt

lant

icAv

eLa

keId

aR

dPB

C6D

32,6

6232

,658

32,9

8942

,300

38,1

0056

02C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Lake

Ida

Rd

35th

Ave

SW

PBC

6D31

,948

29,7

4029

,551

41,2

0035

,300

5626

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

E35

thA

veSW

Gol

fRd

PBC

6D38

,852

34,3

3235

,615

50,7

0039

,600

5624

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EG

olfR

dW

oolb

right

Rd

PBC

6D41

,510

35,6

2738

,169

51,1

0040

,500

5610

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EW

oolb

right

Rd

Boyn

ton

Bea

chBl

vdPB

C6D

38,2

5932

,543

31,3

9548

,200

36,1

0056

58C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Boyn

ton

Bea

chBl

vdO

ldBo

ynto

nR

dPB

C6D

N/A

47,1

3939

,255

39,0

0055

,500

5206

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EO

ldB

oynt

onR

dG

atew

ayB

lvd

PBC

6D48

,285

36,7

8839

,191

52,8

0044

,100

4610

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EG

atew

ayB

lvd

Hyp

olux

oR

dPB

C6D

36,3

4828

,826

27,7

9238

,600

38,4

0046

00C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Hyp

olux

oR

dLa

ntan

aR

dPB

C4D

29,9

9325

,175

23,3

2733

,700

32,0

0046

24C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Lant

ana

Rd

JFK

Dr

FDO

T6D

41,8

1431

,730

33,3

5655

,300

49,1

0046

26C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

JFK

Dr

6th

Ave

SFD

OT

6D44

,492

33,6

1534

,374

58,5

0053

,500

4622

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

E6t

hA

veS

Lake

Wor

thR

dFD

OT

6D43

,176

35,6

8238

,653

56,8

0053

,800

4620

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

ELa

keW

orth

Rd

Fren

chA

veFD

OT

6D45

,274

36,6

2236

,085

54,0

0047

,900

4604

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EFr

ench

Ave

10th

Ave

NFD

OT

6D47

,387

39,7

6940

,836

60,6

0053

,200

4210

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

E10

thA

veN

Fore

stH

illBl

vdFD

OT

6D44

,674

36,6

8035

,570

55,0

0051

,700

3644

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EFo

rest

Hill

Blvd

Sum

mit

Blv

dFD

OT

6D35

,421

29,7

0929

,533

46,1

0041

,800

3674

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

ESu

mm

itB

lvd

Gun

Clu

bR

dFD

OT

6D40

,820

34,4

5834

,957

48,4

0049

,000

3618

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EG

unC

lub

Rd

Sout

hern

Blvd

FDO

T6D

44,5

1534

,224

33,2

6550

,100

42,9

0036

68C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Turn

age

Blvd

(PBI

A)Be

lved

ere

Rd

PBC

27,

890

5,62

54,

532

9,70

05,

300

3606

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EBe

lved

ere

Rd

Oke

echo

bee

Blv

dPB

C4D

24,3

2816

,624

N/A

29,9

0021

,800

3305

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

Palm

Beac

hLa

kes

Blvd

PBC

4D25

,375

16,8

3217

,469

28,9

0023

,400

3930

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EPa

lmBe

ach

Lake

sBl

vdPr

esid

entia

lWay

PBC

529

,729

18,0

3517

,231

33,2

0027

,200

3928

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

EPr

esid

entia

lWay

45th

St

PBC

528

,624

17,4

2416

,245

32,1

0023

,400

2308

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

E45

thS

tM

LKBl

vdPB

C6D

34,4

1725

,403

21,5

0043

,100

36,9

0026

18C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

MLK

Blvd

Blue

Her

onBl

vdPB

C4D

27,0

5518

,586

17,1

4128

,000

20,8

0026

22C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Blue

Her

onBl

vdSi

lver

beac

hR

dPB

C4D

24,3

98N

/A22

,502

41,0

0028

,400

2620

CO

NG

RE

SSAV

ESi

lver

beac

hR

dN

orth

lake

Blvd

PBC

4D25

,819

24,0

4724

,294

30,3

0033

,600

6368

1082

2C

ON

GR

ESS

AVE

Nor

thla

keBl

vdA

lt.A

1AP

BC2

N/A

N/A

N/A

17,3

0012

,000

7011

CR

-717

Stat

eM

arke

tRd

SR-7

29SR

-700

,US

-98

PBC

23,

171

N/A

2,41

55,

200

3,10

0

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

5of

20

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e26

00M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

Nor

thla

keBl

vdH

olly

Dr

FDO

T6D

43,9

9937

,391

41,0

5560

,400

41,6

0026

06M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

Hol

lyD

rPG

AB

lvd

FDO

T6D

44,3

5337

,111

38,8

1651

,200

42,9

0026

24M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

PGA

Blv

dI-9

5PB

C6D

38,8

8233

,368

35,0

1863

,600

39,9

0026

04M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

I-95

Hoo

dR

dPB

C6D

27,5

6424

,838

26,7

4647

,500

26,8

0022

08M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

Hoo

dR

dD

onal

dR

oss

Rd

PBC

6D23

,883

24,2

3324

,051

26,7

0032

,600

1602

MIL

ITAR

YTR

LD

onal

dR

oss

Rd

Fred

eric

kSm

allR

dPB

C6D

30,5

7234

,542

33,7

0941

,600

44,0

0016

08M

ILIT

ARY

TRL

Fred

eric

kSm

allR

dIn

dian

Cre

ekB

lvd

PBC

6D28

,570

30,3

0029

,553

36,4

0038

,500

1600

MIL

ITAR

YTR

LIn

dian

Cre

ekB

lvd

Indi

anto

wn

Rd

PBC

6D25

,419

24,3

2223

,597

29,4

0033

,300

4690

MIN

ERR

DC

ongr

ess

Ave

Hig

hR

idge

Rd

PBC

2N

/AN

/A6,

376

4,80

05,

200

6835

MIZ

NE

RBL

VD

US-

1(F

eder

alH

wy)

Palm

etto

Par

kR

dB

R4D

4,89

59,

033

10,2

017,

600

12,8

0068

34M

IZN

ER

BLV

DPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

Fede

ralH

wy

BR

4D10

,273

10,0

0110

,739

8,00

013

,200

2413

NO

RTH

LAKE

BLV

DSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Rd

140t

hAv

eN

PBC

411

,089

10,0

749,

872

19,5

0014

,500

2421

NO

RTH

LAKE

BLV

D14

0th

Ave

NC

ocon

utBl

vdPB

C4

N/A

N/A

16,2

7832

,200

29,5

0024

11N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Coc

onut

Blvd

Ibis

Rd

PBC

4D29

,704

25,8

8929

,522

34,0

0034

,700

2407

NO

RTH

LAKE

BLV

DIb

isR

dBe

elin

eH

wy

PBC

4D36

,674

32,4

3133

,081

57,9

0050

,600

2401

NO

RTH

LAKE

BLV

DBe

elin

eH

wy

Ryd

erC

upBl

vdPB

C6D

23,9

4921

,045

22,6

8035

,300

26,3

0022

05N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Ryd

erC

upBl

vdSt

eepl

echa

seD

r/B

alle

nisl

esD

rPB

C6D

34,2

8030

,702

30,7

0656

,100

46,6

0026

05N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Stee

plec

hase

Dr/

Balle

nisl

esD

rM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

6D45

,285

N/A

42,6

2462

,300

46,5

0022

07N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Milit

ary

TrI-9

5PB

C6D

51,9

8546

,823

51,4

0665

,400

59,4

0023

09N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

I-95

Con

gres

sAv

ePB

C6D

53,2

9254

,580

58,5

6563

,600

66,3

0028

15N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Con

gres

sAv

eSR

811

PBC

6D44

,623

41,3

1545

,459

38,4

0043

,500

2821

NO

RTH

LAKE

BLV

DSR

811

Pros

perit

yFa

rms

Rd

PBC

6D31

,068

33,6

79N

/A33

,300

40,8

0028

17N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Pros

perit

yFa

rms

Rd

Sout

hwin

dD

rPB

C6D

36,2

1432

,680

34,1

9938

,900

40,5

0028

19N

OR

THLA

KEBL

VD

Sout

hwin

dD

rU

S-1

PBC

6D27

,179

28,8

91N

/A29

,500

33,4

0058

01O

CEA

NAV

EFe

dera

lHw

yN

Oce

anB

lvd

SRA

1AFD

OT

26,

836

6,03

18,

713

7,30

06,

600

4803

OC

EAN

AVE

SRA

1AU

S-1

FDO

T2

17,7

3615

,418

13,1

6619

,000

15,8

0073

2473

60O

KEE

CH

OBE

EBL

VDS

R-8

0/C

R-8

80S

emin

ole

Pra

ttW

hitn

eyR

dP

BC2

N/A

N/A

N/A

5,50

02,

900

3419

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Rd

140t

hPB

C4

12,5

208,

931

8,71

523

,500

14,2

0034

51O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

140t

hC

rest

woo

dBl

vdPB

C4

19,2

6015

,734

14,9

9330

,200

22,9

0034

11O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Cre

stw

ood

Blvd

Roy

alPa

lmB

each

Blvd

PBC

6D36

,631

26,2

0027

,926

50,7

0038

,700

3453

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDR

oyal

Pal

mB

each

Blvd

Wild

catW

ayPB

C6D

63,1

2537

,519

43,4

4660

,700

49,0

0034

01O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Wild

catW

aySR

-7PB

C8D

60,7

7838

,508

42,5

8660

,400

66,6

0034

03O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

SR-7

Sans

bury

'sW

ayFD

OT

8D51

,560

47,4

2149

,003

61,2

0056

,200

3441

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDSa

nsbu

ry's

Way

Beno

istF

arm

sR

dFD

OT

8D57

,338

45,4

7053

,637

73,3

0054

,200

3439

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDBe

nois

tFar

ms

Rd

Skee

sR

dFD

OT

8D61

,364

51,1

1057

,937

80,0

0057

,900

3449

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDSk

ees

Rd

Jog

Rd

FDO

T8D

66,4

8652

,669

60,5

4788

,800

60,6

0031

03O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Jog

Rd

Flor

ida

Turn

pike

FDO

T8D

74,4

2751

,444

60,6

4398

,500

53,9

0032

07O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Flor

ida

Turn

pike

Hav

erhi

llR

dFD

OT

8D70

,171

61,0

2565

,684

94,0

0073

,100

3671

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDH

aver

hill

Rd

Milit

ary

TrFD

OT

8D72

,815

63,9

5668

,211

107,

900

72,2

0036

33O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Milit

ary

TrPa

lmBe

ach

Lake

sBl

vdFD

OT

8D76

,634

71,3

6471

,313

94,1

0075

,900

3603

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDPa

lmBe

ach

Lake

sBl

vdC

ongr

ess

Ave

FDO

T8D

55,2

2646

,833

50,6

6068

,900

55,2

0032

09O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Con

gres

sAv

eI-9

5FD

OT

8D64

,108

59,6

5761

,035

89,7

0068

,700

3307

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDI-9

5Au

stra

lian

Ave

FDO

T8D

66,0

4772

,803

73,4

2310

9,60

060

,600

3813

OKE

ECH

OBE

EBL

VDAu

stra

lian

Ave

Tam

arin

dA

veFD

OT

8D60

,094

64,9

7467

,947

106,

800

70,5

0038

37O

KEEC

HO

BEE

BLVD

Tam

arin

dAv

eD

ixie

Hw

yFD

OT

8D48

,094

40,9

6746

,717

75,9

0049

,100

5639

OLD

BO

YNTO

NR

DM

ilitar

yTr

Law

renc

eR

dPB

C5

18,8

8015

,193

15,7

5028

,000

18,6

0056

27O

LDB

OYN

TON

RD

Law

renc

eR

dC

ongr

ess

Ave

PBC

523

,624

16,9

6218

,627

29,9

0020

,200

5629

OLD

BO

YNTO

NR

DC

ongr

ess

Ave

Boyn

ton

Bea

chBl

vdPB

C2

13,3

81N

/A14

,452

15,4

0016

,100

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

14of

20

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e63

10O

LDD

IXIE

HW

YBr

owar

dC

ount

yLi

neSW

18th

St

BR

4D16

,673

15,2

7317

,498

37,8

0021

,100

6872

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

SW18

thS

tC

amin

oR

eal

BR

4D20

,247

19,0

0823

,805

30,0

0026

,600

6870

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

Cam

ino

Rea

lPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

BR

4D23

,207

21,2

1923

,258

33,4

0026

,900

6900

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

Palm

etto

Par

kR

dG

lade

sR

dB

R5

22,0

4917

,962

22,0

0131

,000

25,3

0068

66O

LDD

IXIE

HW

YG

lade

sR

dN

E20

thSt

BR

4D19

,172

17,8

6122

,030

25,2

0022

,600

6860

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

NE

20th

StSp

anis

hR

iver

Blvd

BR

4D18

,905

17,3

4618

,286

22,9

0019

,200

6862

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

Span

ish

Riv

erBl

vdYa

mat

oR

dB

R4D

17,5

1815

,769

16,7

6117

,100

16,7

0063

04O

LDD

IXIE

HW

YLi

ndel

lBlv

dH

idde

nVa

lley

Blvd

BR

312

,946

11,9

8612

,760

16,0

0015

,200

3302

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

45th

St

MLK

JrBl

vdW

PB

417

,011

11,4

6511

,721

19,7

0012

,800

2810

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

MLK

Blvd

Blue

Her

onBl

vdPB

C5

16,4

0711

,520

13,1

8817

,800

12,4

0028

08O

LDD

IXIE

HW

YBl

ueH

eron

Blvd

Silv

erbe

ach

Rd

PBC

4D17

,101

13,6

6716

,387

17,4

0016

,100

1806

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

SR-8

11/B

each

Rd

Tequ

esta

Dr

PBC

413

,863

12,2

5712

,771

14,3

0018

,900

1814

OLD

DIX

IEH

WY

Tequ

esta

Dr

Cou

nty

Line

Rd

PBC

26,

712

8,11

26,

898

6,90

09,

700

3308

OLI

VE

AVE

SW

PBC

ityLi

mit

Alha

mbr

aPl

WP

B2

10,2

637,

044

6,72

89,

300

7,60

039

26O

LIV

EAV

EAl

ham

bra

PlFo

rest

Hill

Blvd

NO

N2

N/A

N/A

N/A

5,50

02,

600

3910

OLI

VE

AVE

Fore

stH

illBl

vdEs

sex

LnW

PB

211

,041

N/A

N/A

7,20

050

038

92O

LIV

EAV

EEs

sex

LnSo

uthe

rnBl

vdW

PB

212

,025

N/A

N/A

7,70

01,

600

3880

OLI

VE

AVE

Sout

hern

Blvd

Mon

roe

Dr

WP

B2

9,87

04,

446

N/A

5,60

04,

800

3868

OLI

VE

AVE

Mon

roe

Dr

Belv

eder

eR

dPB

C2

8,90

74,

334

N/A

6,30

04,

600

3864

OLI

VE

AVE

Belv

eder

eR

dO

keec

hobe

eB

lW

PB

214

,435

3,90

8N

/A17

,700

4,30

038

48O

LIV

EAV

EO

keec

hobe

eB

lBa

nyan

Blv

dW

PB

213

,932

N/A

N/A

15,1

0011

,800

3836

OLI

VE

AVE

Bany

anB

lvd

Lofti

nSt

WP

B2

10,1

915,

109

3,07

713

,500

6,30

038

30O

LIV

EAV

ELo

ftin

StPa

lmBe

ach

Lake

sBl

vdFD

OT

25,

943

2,95

52,

644

7,50

06,

000

2417

OR

ANG

EB

LVD

Sem

inol

ePr

attW

hitn

eyR

d14

0th

Ave

NPB

C2

N/A

7,29

27,

987

10,0

006,

800

2409

OR

ANG

EB

LVD

140t

hAv

eN

Coc

onut

Blvd

PBC

28,

513

8,08

98,

168

9,80

011

,400

2415

OR

ANG

EB

LVD

Coc

onut

Blvd

Roy

alPa

lmB

each

BlPB

C2

13,6

8912

,613

13,1

2012

,400

14,5

0036

01P

ALM

BEA

CH

LAKE

SBL

VDO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

Villa

geBl

vdPB

C6D

37,5

2631

,840

33,8

1039

,100

36,8

0032

05P

ALM

BEA

CH

LAKE

SBL

VDVi

llage

Blvd

I-95

PBC

6D60

,062

49,8

5853

,359

66,6

0054

,800

3303

PAL

MBE

AC

HLA

KES

BLVD

I-95

PBM

allM

ain

Entra

nce

PBC

6D56

,760

43,9

8655

,446

64,4

0063

,700

3809

PAL

MBE

AC

HLA

KES

BLVD

PBM

allM

ain

Entra

nce

Con

gres

sAv

ePB

C6D

46,7

6141

,485

45,0

0752

,700

49,2

0038

47P

ALM

BEA

CH

LAKE

SBL

VDC

ongr

ess

Ave

Aust

ralia

nAv

ePB

C6D

46,2

8339

,526

40,5

7461

,800

47,4

0038

11P

ALM

BEA

CH

LAKE

SBL

VDAu

stra

lian

Ave

Tam

arin

dA

vePB

C4D

34,0

5529

,121

31,0

1237

,100

32,0

0038

07P

ALM

BEA

CH

LAKE

SBL

VDTa

mar

ind

Ave

Dix

ieH

wy

PBC

4D20

,954

22,2

2023

,513

23,4

0025

,500

6431

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DG

lade

sR

dPo

nder

osa

Dr

PBC

4D14

,533

12,4

5314

,030

19,3

0013

,200

6409

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DPo

nder

osa

Dr

SR-7

PBC

4D25

,341

20,3

7021

,872

32,7

0023

,300

6405

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DSR

-7Ly

ons

Rd

PBC

6D37

,111

30,3

5829

,747

34,7

0033

,500

6425

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DLy

ons

Rd

Boca

Rio

Rd

PBC

6D47

,481

42,3

9141

,885

47,9

0047

,700

6211

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DBo

caR

ioR

dPo

wer

line

Rd

PBC

6D57

,918

47,5

9947

,837

59,9

0064

,200

6617

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DPo

wer

line

Rd

StA

ndre

ws

Blv

dPB

C6D

55,1

8447

,704

47,2

6259

,500

51,0

0066

09P

ALM

ETT

OPA

RK

RD

StA

ndre

ws

Blv

dM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

6D58

,273

52,2

4451

,342

68,3

0053

,000

6209

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DM

ilitar

yTr

I-95

PBC

6D62

,369

56,3

8458

,997

72,3

000

6309

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DI-9

512

thS

tPB

C6D

57,1

5556

,810

56,0

1562

,300

19,5

0068

71P

ALM

ETT

OPA

RK

RD

12th

St

Boca

Rat

onBl

vdB

R4D

38,1

6634

,777

37,6

9739

,900

35,0

0068

73P

ALM

ETT

OPA

RK

RD

Boca

Rat

onBl

vdO

ldD

ixie

Hw

yB

R4D

31,1

2530

,915

29,4

8735

,700

35,9

0068

75P

ALM

ETT

OPA

RK

RD

Old

Dix

ieH

wy

Fede

ralH

wy

BR

4D16

,266

20,3

6720

,798

20,1

0024

,700

6877

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DFe

dera

lHw

yN

E5t

hAv

eB

R4D

17,9

6915

,668

14,3

2519

,900

17,5

0068

03P

ALM

ETT

OPA

RK

RD

NE

5th

Ave

ICW

WBr

idge

BR

4D14

,853

14,6

6213

,533

13,9

0015

,700

6817

PAL

ME

TTO

PAR

KR

DIC

WW

Brid

geA1

APB

C4D

15,1

1914

,135

15,0

6713

,400

14,4

00

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

15of

20

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e13

10P

ALM

WO

OD

AVE

Fred

eric

kSm

allR

dD

onal

dR

oss

Rd

PBC

25,

991

4,14

73,

437

8,40

04,

300

2833

PAR

KAV

EFe

dera

lHw

y10

THSt

PBC

26,

645

5,60

85,

431

12,6

007,

900

5431

1004

9PA

RK

AVE

Con

gres

sAv

eO

ldD

ixie

Hw

yP

BC2

N/A

N/A

N/A

12,6

0011

,400

3902

PAR

KER

AVE

Fore

stH

illBl

vdSu

mm

itB

lvd

WP

B2

7,11

1N

/AN

/A8,

800

12,0

0038

96P

ARKE

RAV

ESu

mm

itB

lvd

Sout

hern

Blvd

WP

B4

14,7

31N

/AN

/A13

,100

10,0

0038

72P

ARKE

RAV

ESo

uthe

rnBl

vdBe

lved

ere

Rd

WP

B4

9,95

7N

/AN

/A10

,100

8,40

038

56P

ARKE

RAV

EBe

lved

ere

Rd

Oke

echo

bee

Blv

dW

PB

419

,454

N/A

N/A

11,3

0020

,200

6908

1002

5PE

RSI

MM

ON

BLV

DS

emin

ole

Pra

ttW

hitn

eyR

d14

0th

Ave

NP

BC4

N/A

N/A

N/A

7,40

07,

000

3447

PER

SIM

MO

NB

LVD

130t

hAv

eN

Roy

alPa

lmB

each

BlPB

C2

7,62

15,

874

5,97

719

,700

024

05P

GA

BLV

DBe

eLi

neH

wy

Ryd

erC

upBl

vd(J

ogR

d)FD

OT

45,

801

3,47

93,

518

11,7

005,

600

2103

PG

ABL

VD

Ryd

erC

upBl

vd(J

ogR

d)Fl

orid

aTu

rnpi

keFD

OT

4D24

,751

22,9

9525

,572

35,0

0029

,400

2201

PG

ABL

VD

Flor

ida

Turn

pike

Cen

tralB

lvd

FDO

T6D

46,8

4845

,217

43,6

2768

,900

61,7

0026

09P

GA

BLV

DC

entra

lBlv

dM

ilitar

yTr

FDO

T6D

47,7

9344

,296

47,2

7854

,900

47,0

0022

03P

GA

BLV

DM

ilitar

yTr

I-95

FDO

T6D

49,3

4246

,147

49,9

0156

,700

46,1

0023

03P

GA

BLV

DI-9

5SR

811

FDO

T8D

61,7

6159

,950

69,3

7961

,400

72,5

0028

29P

GA

BLV

DSR

811

Gar

dens

Mal

lFD

OT

6D57

,253

51,6

7754

,625

77,3

0072

,500

2805

PG

ABL

VD

Gar

dens

Mal

lPr

ospe

rity

Farm

sR

dFD

OT

6D44

,137

38,0

7641

,536

46,4

0038

,500

2803

PG

ABL

VD

Pros

perit

yFa

rms

Rd

Ellis

onW

ilson

Rd

FDO

T6D

45,6

6739

,880

39,7

9448

,900

41,0

0028

37P

GA

BLV

DEl

lison

Wils

onR

dFe

dera

lHw

yFD

OT

6D30

,962

26,4

7026

,974

36,7

0028

,500

3448

PIK

ER

DSo

uthe

rnBl

vdFl

aTu

rnpi

keE

ntra

nce

PBC

413

,697

14,3

9215

,116

22,1

0025

,500

3450

PIK

ER

DFl

aTu

rnpi

keE

ntra

nce

Belv

eder

eR

dPB

C2

5,74

54,

703

5,63

87,

100

9,80

042

14P

INE

TREE

LNFo

rest

Hill

Blvd

Kelle

rRd

PBC

22,

383

2,38

22,

253

2,90

02,

900

4662

PIN

EHU

RST

DR

10th

Ave

NLa

keW

orth

Rd

PBC

210

,323

8,78

99,

014

10,1

0011

,000

4202

PIN

EHU

RST

DR

Fore

stH

illBl

vd10

THAv

eN

PBC

210

,475

9,27

69,

579

12,2

0011

,800

5657

PIP

ER

SG

LEN

BLV

DEl

Cla

irR

anch

Rd

Milit

ary

TrPB

C2

5,86

95,

429

5,28

49,

800

7,20

038

14P

OIN

SET

TIA

AVE

36TH

St25

THSt

WP

B2

4,72

5N

/AN

/A5,

400

5,80

038

06P

OIN

SET

TIA

AVE

45th

St36

thSt

WP

B2

11,1

88N

/AN

/A12

,300

3,50

038

00P

OIN

SET

TIA

AVE

45TH

StN

End

WP

B2

2,83

7N

/AN

/A3,

900

3,90

083

0810

057

POLO

RD

Lake

Wor

thR

dLy

ons

Rd

PBC

2N

/AN

/AN

/A15

,400

14,3

0064

23P

ON

DE

RO

SAD

RG

lade

sR

dPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

PBC

24,

734

4,30

73,

945

5,80

05,

100

6625

PO

TOM

ACR

DJo

gR

dSt

And

rew

sB

lvd

BR

4D7,

812

7,24

28,

190

16,3

0013

,700

6623

PO

TOM

ACR

DSt

And

rew

sB

lvd

Milit

ary

TrBR

410

,902

9,99

911

,365

17,7

0013

,600

6210

PO

WER

LIN

ER

DBr

owar

dC

ount

yLi

neSW

18th

St

FDO

T4D

37,0

25N

/A34

,347

50,8

0042

,800

6632

PO

WER

LIN

ER

DSW

18th

St

Cam

ino

Rea

lFD

OT

4D35

,270

N/A

31,2

7045

,100

30,1

0066

26P

OW

ERLI

NE

RD

Cam

ino

Rea

lPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

FDO

T4D

43,5

55N

/A44

,561

50,5

0037

,900

6622

PO

WER

LIN

ER

DPa

lmet

toP

ark

Rd

Suns

tream

Blv

dFD

OT

4D29

,310

N/A

28,2

7434

,100

22,2

0066

02P

OW

ERLI

NE

RD

Suns

tream

Blv

dG

lade

sR

dFD

OT

4D31

,736

N/A

24,4

0738

,900

31,8

0014

02P

RAT

T-W

HIT

NE

YR

DIn

dian

tow

nR

dBe

eLi

neH

wy

PBC

23,

556

4,22

84,

726

16,4

0011

,100

1104

PR

ATT-

WH

ITN

EY

RD

Indi

anto

wn

Rd

Mar

tinC

ount

yLi

nePB

C2

2,71

12,

994

3,36

87,

900

6,60

028

06P

RO

SPE

RIT

YFA

RM

SR

DN

orth

lake

Blvd

Ligh

thou

seD

rPB

C3

19,1

9917

,866

17,4

1218

,800

18,3

0028

36P

RO

SPE

RIT

YFA

RM

SR

DLi

ghth

ouse

Dr

Burn

sR

dPB

C3

20,6

0417

,850

17,1

5020

,900

19,2

0028

04P

RO

SPE

RIT

YFA

RM

SR

DBu

rns

Rd

PGA

Blv

dPB

C5

27,9

3127

,164

26,8

8631

,300

28,5

0028

02P

RO

SPE

RIT

YFA

RM

SR

DPG

AB

lvd

Hoo

dR

dPB

C4D

17,8

5018

,843

19,9

8726

,100

22,0

0023

02P

RO

SPE

RIT

YFA

RM

SR

DH

ood

Rd

Don

ald

Ros

sR

dPB

C2

11,6

729,

970

8,56

914

,400

11,0

0046

37P

UR

DY

LNJo

gR

dH

aver

hill

Rd

PBC

27,

532

8,53

67,

210

7,40

010

,600

4639

PU

RD

YLN

Hav

erhi

llR

dM

ilitar

yTr

PBC

213

,248

9,58

310

,321

15,9

0012

,600

3938

QU

ADR

ILLE

BLV

DO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

Fern

St

WP

B4

9,89

5N

/AN

/A-3

,700

21,7

0039

36Q

UAD

RIL

LEBL

VD

Fern

StC

lem

atis

StW

PB

414

,807

N/A

N/A

21,8

009,

300

3934

QU

ADR

ILLE

BLV

DC

lem

atis

StSR

-5W

PB

414

,089

N/A

N/A

20,3

0010

,300

2831

RC

ABL

VD

AltA

1APr

ospe

rity

Farm

sR

dPB

C2

10,0

909,

138

9,86

510

,500

10,7

0016

11R

OEB

UC

KR

DLo

xaha

tche

eR

iver

Rd

Cen

tralB

lvd

PBC

28,

579

5,47

75,

200

7,90

05,

800

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

16of

20

Stat

ion

Road

way

From

ToO

wne

r

Cos

tFe

asib

leLa

nes

Obs

erve

d20

05C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

10C

ount

s

Obs

erve

d20

14C

ount

s20

40LR

TPA

djus

ted

Volu

me

2040

SER

PM7

Adj

uste

dVo

lum

e60

9566

65R

OEB

UC

KR

DS

R-7

Jog

Rd

PBC

4N

/AN

/AN

/A19

,400

15,8

0031

07R

OEB

UC

KR

DJo

gR

dH

aver

hill

Rd

PBC

418

,602

17,9

1318

,539

21,9

0028

,400

3681

RO

EBU

CK

RD

Hav

erhi

llR

dM

ilitar

yTr

ail

PBC

2N

/A8,

588

9,39

015

,900

11,0

0034

12R

OYA

LPA

LMBE

ACH

BLV

DSo

uthe

rnBl

vdO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

RPB

215

,190

15,9

1113

,527

18,3

0017

,500

3410

RO

YAL

PALM

BEAC

HBL

VD

Oke

echo

bee

Blv

dR

PBN

orth

City

Lim

itsR

PB4D

38,0

6722

,123

21,3

8427

,600

23,0

0034

26R

OYA

LPA

LMBE

ACH

BLV

DR

PBN

orth

City

Lim

itsM

Can

alPB

C4D

32,7

2216

,753

14,0

3027

,800

22,0

0024

02R

OYA

LPA

LMBE

ACH

BLV

DM

Can

alO

rang

eBl

vdPB

C4

17,1

1315

,825

15,9

3219

,400

19,2

0038

19R

OYA

LPA

LMBR

IDG

EC

ount

yR

dO

live

Ave

FDO

T4D

22,9

2520

,023

29,2

6530

,300

18,0

0038

33R

OYA

LPO

INC

IAN

AW

AYN

Flag

lerD

rR

oyal

Poi

ncia

naW

yFD

OT

424

,543

15,1

22N

/A38

,800

13,5

0034

14S

ANSB

UR

YSW

AYSo

uthe

rnBl

vdBe

lved

ere

Rd

PBC

25,

869

9,20

011

,970

10,4

0011

,900

3454

SAN

SBU

RYS

WAY

Belv

eder

eR

dO

keec

hobe

eB

lPB

C2

4,80

37,

691

6,83

59,

400

8,10

058

02S

EAC

RE

STBL

VD

23rd

Ave

Woo

lbrig

htR

dPB

C5

22,5

5421

,073

20,5

6625

,000

22,0

0058

00S

EAC

RE

STBL

VD

Woo

lbrig

htR

dBo

ynto

nB

each

Blvd

PBC

517

,989

13,9

8211

,793

23,2

0019

,400

5302

SEA

CR

EST

BLV

DBo

ynto

nB

each

Blvd

Gat

eway

Blv

dPB

C5

14,7

9512

,733

11,4

2315

,800

15,7

0048

06S

EAC

RE

STBL

VD

Gat

eway

Blv

dH

ypol

uxo

Rd

PBC

514

,029

11,6

3711

,046

16,7

0015

,500

3420

SEM

INO

LEP

RAT

T-W

HIT

NE

YR

DSo

uthe

rnBl

vdO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

PBC

4D18

,769

14,3

5113

,400

22,3

0020

,400

3424

SEM

INO

LEP

RAT

T-W

HIT

NE

YR

DO

keec

hobe

eB

lvd

Syca

mor

eD

rEPB

C4

22,3

7717

,383

N/A

39,0

0019

,800

3442

SEM

INO

LEP

RAT

T-W

HIT

NE

YR

DSy

cam

ore

DrE

60TH

STN

PBC

4D18

,742

16,6

20N

/A38

,100

23,0

0024

08S

EMIN

OLE

PR

ATT-

WH

ITN

EY

RD

60TH

STN

Ora

nge

BlPB

C4D

14,6

4614

,772

N/A

28,6

0020

,500

2406

SEM

INO

LEP

RAT

T-W

HIT

NE

YR

DO

rang

eBl

Nor

thla

keBl

vdPB

C4

15,7

8111

,076

10,4

6031

,000

21,3

0010

0271

0029

SEM

INO

LEPR

ATT

-WH

ITN

EYR

DN

ofN

orth

lake

Blvd

SR

-710

PBC

2N

/AN

/AN

/A15

,500

8,30

046

44S

HER

WO

OD

FOR

EST

BLV

DLa

keW

orth

Rd

10th

Ave

NPB

C2

7,67

75,

767

7,69

98,

100

9,70

046

54S

HER

WO

OD

FOR

EST

BLV

D10

thA

veN

Cre

stha

ven

Blv

dPB

C2

9,09

57,

736

8,62

29,

700

10,6

0042

00S

HER

WO

OD

FOR

EST

BLV

DC

rest

have

nB

lvd

Fore

stH

illBl

vdPB

C2

7,43

46,

348

6,75

19,

100

9,20

026

15S

ILVE

RBE

AC

HR

DC

ongr

ess

Ave

Old

Dix

ieH

wy

PBC

3N

/A13

,508

13,4

906,

900

12,8

0028

07S

ILVE

RBE

AC

HR

DO

ldD

ixie

Hw

yU

S-1

PBC

313

,451

11,5

9111

,939

17,1

0013

,600

3418

SKE

ESR

DO

keec

hobe

eB

lBe

lved

ere

Rd

PBC

25,

651

4,95

64,

663

10,2

006,

500

3446

SO

UTH

SHO

RE

DR

Lake

Wor

thR

dG

reen

view

Shor

esBl

WEL

218

,874

16,2

7116

,739

20,2

0018

,300

3429

SO

UTH

SHO

RE

DR

Gre

envi

ewSh

ores

BlBi

gBl

ueTr

ace

WEL

4D20

,318

18,4

7021

,697

21,5

0020

,100

3421

SO

UTH

SHO

RE

DR

Big

Blue

Trac

eFo

rest

Hill

Blvd

WEL

4D26

,822

23,8

3826

,986

29,0

0026

,200

3101

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DC

R88

0Li

onC

ount

ryS

afar

iFD

OT

4D17

,567

19,7

0215

,321

24,7

0034

,100

3467

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DLi

onC

ount

ryS

afar

iSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Rd

FDO

T6D

N/A

22,4

9020

,081

36,5

0053

,500

3443

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DSe

min

ole

Prat

tWhi

tney

Rd

Bink

sFo

rest

Driv

eFD

OT

6D37

,182

28,6

3029

,957

62,9

0045

,700

3431

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DBi

nks

Fore

stD

rive

Big

Blue

Trac

eFD

OT

6D35

,256

35,3

0533

,674

60,2

0056

,300

3413

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DBi

gBl

ueTr

ace

Fore

stH

ill/C

rest

woo

dFD

OT

6D45

,385

46,8

8146

,540

65,2

0072

,100

3417

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DFo

rest

Hill/

Cre

stw

ood

Cyp

ress

Hea

dFD

OT

6D42

,335

54,3

0357

,966

68,9

0073

,700

3437

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DC

ypre

ssH

ead

Roy

alPa

lmB

each

Blvd

FDO

T6D

45,3

5253

,158

59,0

3675

,500

71,3

0034

05S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Roy

alP

alm

Bea

chBl

vdLa

mst

ein

LnFD

OT

8D48

,779

N/A

N/A

84,1

0080

,400

3409

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DLa

mst

ein

LnSR

-7FD

OT

8D51

,263

65,8

9772

,235

88,7

0080

,600

3415

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DSR

7Sa

nsbu

ry's

Way

FDO

T8D

38,8

5461

,147

69,5

3577

,500

75,8

0031

05S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Sans

bury

'sW

ayPi

keR

dFD

OT

8D43

,644

62,0

1072

,910

90,2

0084

,200

9307

49S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Pike

Rd

Fla

Turn

pike

Ent

ranc

eFD

OT

8D45

,951

56,7

49N

/A17

,700

82,4

0032

23S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Fla

Turn

pike

Ent

ranc

eJo

gR

dFD

OT

8D39

,180

56,8

5867

,154

75,6

0067

,400

3643

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DJo

gR

dH

aver

hill

Rd

FDO

T8D

32,6

5861

,432

75,7

5538

,300

72,6

0036

35S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Hav

erhi

llR

dM

ilitar

yTr

FDO

T8D

30,8

8464

,446

N/A

38,9

0078

,600

3637

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DM

ilitar

yTr

Kirk

Rd

FDO

T8D

26,9

6167

,701

69,1

1951

,300

84,6

0036

73S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Kirk

Rd

Con

gres

sAv

eFD

OT

8D33

,449

58,7

5264

,701

55,7

0069

,700

3639

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DC

ongr

ess

Ave

SBC

ongr

ess

Ave

NB

FDO

T8D

53,5

84N

/AN

/A67

,200

27,9

0036

75S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Con

gres

sAv

eN

BG

emLa

keFD

OT

8D53

,584

58,3

49N

/A46

,500

68,5

0032

17S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Gem

Lake

I-95

FDO

T8D

31,2

9251

,969

59,9

8351

,300

48,1

0033

13S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

I-95

Park

erA

veFD

OT

8D30

,197

30,7

7631

,746

38,0

0034

,700

3823

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DPa

rker

Ave

Dix

ieH

wy

FDO

T5

22,1

6022

,301

23,0

1025

,400

24,1

0038

25S

OU

THER

NB

LVD

Dix

ieH

wy

Flag

lerD

rFD

OT

513

,377

11,5

9513

,044

17,2

0010

,900

3827

SO

UTH

ERN

BLV

DFl

agle

rDr

Oce

anB

lvd

FDO

T2

14,5

0412

,830

13,6

3415

,700

11,9

0066

05S

PAN

ISH

RIV

ER

BLVD

Milit

ary

TrIB

MAc

cess

BR4

24,6

1822

,574

25,6

0728

,200

22,6

0063

05S

PAN

ISH

RIV

ER

BLVD

IBM

Acce

ssPe

rimet

erR

dB

R4

22,7

7623

,173

26,5

0721

,000

22,4

0068

11S

PAN

ISH

RIV

ER

BLVD

Perim

eter

Rd

Old

Dix

ieH

wy

BR4D

21,4

9119

,254

22,5

0533

,600

21,8

00

10/14/20

15S:\LRT

P\20

40LRTP

\Mod

eling\Co

stFeasiblePlan

\204

0CF

Mod

elVo

lumes_S65_U

pdate_10

1315

.xlsx

Page

17of

20



APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS(MINTO WEST, AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE)

Exhibit 2A Minto West Daily Trip Generation

West Side

Land Use

Residential - SF Residential - MF Apts. Residential - MF Condos. Residential- 55+ Detached Residential- 55+ Attached General Office Research & Devel. Retail Park

TOTALS

East Side

Land Use Residential- SF (N,O,T,U) Residential - SF IF,M,P,Q,R,Si

Residential - MF Condos. Residential - MF Apts. Hotel Community College General Office Research & Devel. Light Industrial Retail Park Community Center Church Daycare

TOTALS

ITE Code Intensity

210 - DUs 220 - DUs 230 150 DUs 251 300 DUs 252 200 DUs 710 150,000 SF 760 425,000 SF 820 350,000 SF 412 125 Acres

ITE Code Intensity

210 1,010 DUs 210 2,436 DUs 230 450 DUs 220 - DUs 310 150 Rooms

540* 3,000 Students 710 300,000 SF 760 175,000 SF 110 450,000 SF 820 150,000 SF 412 67 Acres 495 70,000 SF 560 70,000 SF 565 10,000 SF

Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2)

10 /DU - - 26.2% 6.65 /DU - - 26.2% 6.65 /DU 998 261 26.2%

8/DU 2,400 629 26.2% 6/DU 1,200 314 26.2%

Ln (T) = 0.77Ln (X)+3.65 1,823 179 9.8% Ln (T) = 0.83Ln (X)+3.09 (3) 3,338 327 9.8%

Ln (T) = 0.65Ln (X)+5.83 1 5,331 767 5.0% 2.28 /Acre 285 29 10.0%

25,375 2,506 9.9%

Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2)

10 /DU 10,100 1,192 11.8% 10 /DU 24,360 2,874 11.8%

6.65 /DU 2,993 353 11.8% 6.65 /DU - - 11.8% 8.92 /Room 1,338 591 44.2% 2.29 /Student 6,870 1,594 23.2%

Ln (T) = 0.77Ln (X)+3.65 3,109 432 13.9% Ln (T) = 0.83Ln (X)+3.09 (3) 1,598 222 13.9%

6.97 /1000 SF 3,137 436 13.9% Ln (T) = 0.65Ln (X)+5.83 8,839 4,172 47.2%

2.28 /Acre 153 47 30.5% 33.82 /1000 SF 2,367 722 30.5%

9.11 /1000 SF 638 195 30.5% 74.06 /1000 SF 741 226 30.5%

66,243 13,056 19.7%

External Interzonal Trips Trips (4)

- - 0.0%

- - 0.0% 737 84 11.4%

1,771 211 11.9% 886 103 11.6%

1,644 106 6.4% 3,011 195 6.5%

14,564 2,222 15.3% 256 19 7.4%

22,869 2,940 11.6%

External Interzonal Trips Trips (2)

8,908 481 5.4% 21,486 1,182 5.5%

2,640 145 5.5% . - 0.0% 747 64 8.6%

5,276 343 6.5% 2,677 110 4.1% 1,376 63 4.6% 2,701 111 4.1% 4,667 397 8.5%

106 - 0.0% 1,645 26 1.6%

443 12 2.6% 515 6 1.2%

53,187 2,940 4.4%

Trip Gen +Internal 13-013 8-7-14 4546+2M+PC

8/13/2014

External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips

- - 0% -- . 0% -653 - 0% 653

1,560 - 0% 1,560 783 - 0% 783

1,538 154 10% 1,384 2,816 282 10% 2,534

12,342 3,542 28.7% 8,800J 237 - 0% 2371

19,929 3,978 15,951 I

External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips

8,427 - 0% 8,427 20,304 - 0% 20,304

2,495 - 0% 2,495 - - 0% -683 68 10% 615

4,933 - 0% 4,933 2,567 257 10% 2,310 1,313 131 10% 1,182 2,590 259 10% 2,331 4,270 1,563 36.6% 2,707

106 - 0% 106 1,619 81 5% 1,538

431 22 5% 409 509 255 SO% 254

50,247 2,636 47,611

(COMBINED TOTALS I 91,618 I 15,562 I 17.0%1 76,056 I 5,880 I 6.4%1 70,176 I 6,614 I I 63,562 I

• Rate obtained from Palm Beach State College trip generation study by Kimley-Horn. See Appendix B.

111 Source: Palm Beach County ULDC Article 13, unless otherwise noted.

121 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates.

131 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition.

141 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates with adjustments to balance with the east side interzonal trips.

[ P~ernalization: 23:4%]

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Minto West Traffic Analysis, Pinder-Troutman Counsulting, Inc. 8/18/2014

0

~ 2%

SYCAMORE DRIVE --:J

[ - 5 MILE RADIUS 32%1

22%

3%

I -1

2% 1%

1%

3%

0.5%

I 15.5% 16% 16% 200/o 22.5%

16%1

20%1

23%

0 > > 1.5% ~ 0.5% ~

~ r

2% 1% ---~----

TEMPLE BLVD

0.5% 0.5%

3% 2% ORANGE BOULEVARD

5%

05~

4.5%1

2.5% I

0 ~

0%

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD

0 ~

4%

3% ~ 2% 0.5%1; 0 < u 0 ~

13%

0.5%

u

~

11% ~ if 8%

6% 0.5%

~ 60th STREET N

2.5%

12% I 10.5%

_PERSIMMON l~~o 4o/o 4% 13

_5%

----------'~- .5% -Q~5o/o 3.5% ORANGE GROVE BLVD ~~ 1m

3.5%

13.5%

10% 9.5% 9% I 6% 6% 6.5%

0 :: .;'0.5% 8 1%

19%

t 5%

0.5°A § 15.5% 11.5% 11.5%

0

3% ROEBUCK ROAD

~ 0.5% ~

~ z

1% ~ 1%

100/o 9%

PCA BOULEVARD

5%

3% 3%

9% 5% 1% N.T.S.

3%

1% 0

2 00/o

\)

Q

0.5% ROEBUCK I ROAD

0

1% I~ I o.5%l 0.5% Q

2%

6.5° 5% OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

1%

00/o -I BELVEDERE ROAD

5% SOUTHERN BOULEVARD

- 4%/~ 01 2%1:;; ,,,. P'' ::: 5·5 '• B/12/14

0

~

~ ~ ~ I I I 13-013

1.--__ M_I_N_r_o_w-Es-r-~;:______,·1 I PROJEi~~~~~R~~uTJoN IIPTci

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Minto West Traffic Analysis, Pinder-Troutman Counsulting, Inc. 8/18/2014

Avemr Concurrency Traffic Study

2.2.1 Trip Generation

Project trip generation was based on the rates published in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS). Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used when TPS rates were not available. Trip generation data from

Northwood University and Palm Beach State College were used to calculate the trip generation for

the proposed University at Avenir.

2.2.2 Internal Capture

In terms capture refers to the satisfaction of trips within the project. In other words, some trips generated by mixed-use projects do not exit the project or enter the major roadway system. Lnternal

traffic was estimated based on the methodology of the Transportation Research Board (TRB)

National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 684. This methodology estimates morning and afternoon peak- period trips to and from six specific land use categories:

office, retail, restaurant, residential, cinema, and hotel.

2.2.3 Pass-by Trips

Some trips generated by the non-residential uses are from existing traffic passing the proposed

project and are not newly generated trips. Credit against the trip generation of the proposed project

was taken for these trips up to the percentage shown in Article 13, Tmpact Fees. or the ITE Manual. Pass-by traffic does not exceed 25% of the adjacent street traffic.

A summary of the project trip generation analysis including internal capture and pass-by trips is shown in Table 2. Detailed analysis is provided in Appendix C. Based on the project, net, new external trips the Radius of Development Lnfluence (RDI) for this analysis is five miles.

Table 2 Project Trip Generation Summary

Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Daily In Out Total %Internal In Out Total %Internal

ITE Trip Generation 78,697 3,304 2,866 6,170 3,425 4,693 8, 118

NCHRP Internal -16, 185 1 -20.8% -587 -588 -1,175

-1 9.0% -897 -896 -1,793 -22.1%

Pass-by -4,341 1 -5.3% -226 -36 -262 -4.2% -185 -366 -551 -6.8%

Net New External Trip 58,171 2,491 2,242 4,733 2,343 3,431 5,774 Difftrtnct

Page -l

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Avenir Concurrency Traffic Study, Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 9/1/2015

I 5 I 0 OS

. . I 0 '· . .

PJ{~),r~ r LiH .\l i t) .

IJ 0

. . 0 :o !:? _, .. . "' -.

~--____::::...;_..:.:...._~-+-:-:-t----.- ..... . I 0 I 5

0 c ..

.... rt

"' "' 0

Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Traffic Eng1neering, Transportation Planning

969 SE Federal H1ghway Suite 402 Stuart. Flonda 34994

Tel. 772-781-7918

6

10

10

3.0

0 "' - 0

FIGURE- 2

TRIP DISTRIBUTION

AVENIR

e NORTH

APRIL 16, 2015

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Avenir Concurrency Traffic Study, Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. 9/1/2015

INDIAN TRAILS GROVE

TEST 2 - TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS

TABLE 11 - Dailv Traffic Generation

~ Lanciluse .. ~t .. . . ., ~~;."t;•

-~f~~~~l:l;ilt!~!il Singie Family Detached 2i0 I 500 !Dwelling Units 10

J Grand Totals:

TABLE 12- AM Peak Hour T1raffic Generation ITE ~>r::· ....

Lanf.tuse Code lntem_sity RatetE~.u:atien Single Family Detached 210 500 !Dwelling Units 0.75

I Grand Totals:

TABLE.13- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation I'I!E ,. ··: ,..

Land.use e~ ln_ten'i~V. Rate,f;E,qu~ti~JI' Singie t-amily Detached 2i0 500 !Dwelling Units Ln(T) - 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51

I Grand Totals:

Dir~Sptit !

' l019~~-I

Dlrspnt ·. ' ln I Out o.25 I o.75

D.iiSJOJit In t O!Jt:

o.63 1 o.37

"•"il;::•o:

07/15/2015 Revised 08/28/2015

Qt.~~~ Trips 5,000

5,000

Gress Trips In Out Total 94 281 375

94 281 375

· Gross Trips • · l.m 0§J-t Total 282 165 447

282 165 447

~:~ocuments\PROJECTS\2014114.096 GL WesfiConcurreny T raffle Study_August.2015 Submittatllndian Trails Grove Traffic RSIMM()~TE

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Indian Trails Grove PUD Traffic Statement, Simmons & White, Inc., 8/28/2015

~~!5! ::::J5VI~

(.)

~

@ PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

L_j 2-MILE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE

SIMMO~ITE ENBINUIIINI I nANIIINil I C:ONIULTINB I SINCE 1882.

AuthorfzGtlon No. 3452 2581 M.tr-ttre Blvd w..t•Sulta 3•Wnt Palm Beach, florldo .»407• (5111) 478-~

§ §..., § 8 NORlHl.AKE Cl ...J ...... Cl BOULEVARD

~I§ ~ =>

~® ~ => => TEMPLE ~ BOULEVARD ~

§ ® ~ i!:

® ® .~ ORANGE ®..J BOULEVARD !3 aJjs z

0 (.) 0 ~ (.)

60TH STREET

s PERSIMMON BOULEVARD

MINTO WEST

SYCAMORE DRIVE I

@

~IS§ c.. 30%

II§ SOUTHERN

@

!>2!ii~ za:::a::: ii3f2C>

@ § 5i! OKEECHOBEE 0 ~

BOULEVARD a::: a::: ID ......

8 BOULEVARD

FIGURE 5 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION-TEST 2 ANALVSIS (5-YEAR BVILDOUT - 500 SF HOMES)

Cl

~ !ill §

Cl 0

~I® a::: (.)

Cl

~~ -::. 0 ID

INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 14-096 BK 07-15-15

REVISED 08-28-15

N

4 N.T.S.

chris.heggen

Typewriter


TEST 2 • FIVE YEAR BULDOUT (2020) 2 MILE RADIUS' AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOT<ll. AM PEAK HOUR PRo.ECT TRIPS (ENTERING) •

·-·..-. .. .... .-'"'--~·· ¥ -

;:.-~?~7j~if;t~' . 1r ···' . ,., . ;~ ...

\;~

RONJWAY FROM

60TH STREET SITE

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD

60TH STREET SEMlNOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD

PERSIMMON BOULEVARD

SYCAMORE DRIVE

OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD

OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD BROAD FROAO

NORTHLAKE BOULEV ARC SEMlNOLE PRA IT W HITNEY ROAD

Notes:

3.03% 94 ...

TO

' <,:.,

SEMINOLE PRATI WHITNEY"'

TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD 60TH STREET

PERSIMMON BOULEVARD

SYCAMORE DRIVE

OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

SOUTHERN BOULEVARD BROAD

' ROAD'"

140TH AVENUE

(1) Tote! BackorOI..nd Trame equals 11M h~ d lhe erea wide g10¥fth rl!lteu ,,., beci<.Qround ;f"OIIIIIIth plus CctMiitftld trips fmdudW'Ia Minto Wnt). (2) M'nb West buildout is 2035. (3) Due to the~~ buildout, this segment CCJ'Isidered unlnWuppb!d floN

(4)CcluntsderiwedfrDrl'ltumingmcMif1'l«ltCCli.Jnt (5) TobeccnMI'V81foM, lhemafor pn:lject lrlfr.;-~asaumed lobe lhe- • ful bulldoutwi1h lhetllCI:eplion dMinloWesl

·1;,

DIIU;GTIOH

EB ' WB

NB NB NB NB SB NB SB NB SB SB EB EB EB EB

X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\1 oH>98 GL Wnt\Ca~eurreny Tr.tftc Sludy_August.2015 Submlit81\lndian Trill Is GrOY8 Trefflc Repctt AUQU&t.2011S B.K.

INDIAN TRAILS GROVE

WbUZ AM PEAK HOUR· TEST 2

2015 AM~: . ·:~:-.··; ••. FUU ·>;·. P=~ :;•''·: .,, 0.5% ·e· ( All PEAK :'i>;

HOUR PBQJECT PROJECT MAJOR MINTO i_': TRAFFIC"' . BACKGROU_ND

TRN:FIC1 DISTRIBI:IJIOH TRJiiS PROJECif'0 TRAFFIC ' 51201 .. , TRAFFIC

306 100'11 281 0 0 0 8 99 100'11 94 0 0 0 2

508 25'11 70 211 364 91 13 508 25'11 70 29 456 114 13 664 30'11 64 21 615 154 17 656 70'11 66 21 729 182 22 793 70'11 197 19 783 191 20 856 70'11 66 21 006 227 22 793 70'11 197 19 666 217 20 633 70'11

•'. 66 21 787 197 16

951 70'11 197 19 752 188 24 861 30% 84 150 501 125 22 530 30'11 64 1 228 57 13 530 30'11 84 1 216 54 13 860 30'11 84 34 205 51 22 781 25'11 70 305 364 91 20

= ~:: " i TOTAL WIDE ·' BACKGROUND

GROWTH ~(I)

50 50 16 16 83 133 83 156

109 192 140 225 130 230 140 270 130 256 104 234 156 231 141 2117 87 87 87 87

141 141 128 416

07{1~15

Re'o'ised 08.12812015

2020 •

BCKOD ;~:- 2020 ~.~.-~ TRAFJ;IC ' ' TOTAL "ASSURED

~;rf~~~~- ~~~~TS WIO PR(i)J TRAFFIC

356 837 ' 115 209 641 711 664 734 658 940

1061 1146 1023 1220 1126 1191 1049 1246 667 933 1182 1379 1158 1242 617 701 617 701

1001 1065 1197 1267

LANES CI:ASS LOSE

2 I 880 2 I 880

4D I 1960 40 I 1960 40 I 1960 40 II 1870 40 ' II 1870 40 I 1960 40 I 1960 40 VUNI • 2700 40 1/UNI • 2700 40 I 1960 2 I 880 2 UNI 1440 2 UNI 1440

40 I 1960

0. SI.'-IMc.>Ns.:..~·wurn: -~:·:.·.;;·::·::.-.; ·;:· .. :·;. :: :,,·,;;

STD.

.. YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

chris.heggen

Typewriter


TEST 2 • FIVE YEAR BUILDOUT (2020} 2 MILE RADIUS AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS•(ENTERING}• TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS (EXITING) •

. . ; ~, ·-·--:'~: , ... ··!_ • ._, wi;

3.08% 282 185

INDIAN TRAILS GROVE

TABLE18 PM PEAK HOUR • TEST 2

?r:~,- : PM2~ :-:·~~-;~~~;-~_~-:·.:_4,~ p:~~:\.~!;:~-~~;:,;~-~~,~~ FULL p= ~~;~ 0.5% ;-:.~,X~-1 !Roae: ~~~~~ TOTAL ~-~-~# a:Z:o -~f! 2020 ~:{':~lU•"'

0711512015 R8Yised0812812015

"'.-..~ .. , ....

ROADWAY FROM ll , ·· "··'· H0,UR • PROJECT PROJECT ·~ MAJOR ~--~ MINTO TRAFFICPI BACKGROUND • WIDE BACKGROUND i. TRAFFIC '' TOTAL ASSURED

TO DIRECTION TRAFFIC IISTRIBUTIDI TRIPS PROJECl'" TRAFFIC · (5120} TRAFFIC GROWTH TRAFFIC111 WID PROJ TRAFFIC LANES CLASS

· >~~ ;1!·:;:;, MEETS

• LOS LOSE STD.

60TH STREET

SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD


NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD

Notes:

SITE ' ' SEMINOLEPRATTWHITNEY''1 ~~ r- ~:~ -;= . ;-:-~:_---~g-- :, g ·. g- : ~-' :- ~- ~ ----:-.: ~ .,,_ ,,, ~~ ·: ~ · ~ ··- . : - = ~~ NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD SB 527 25% 71 45 456 114 13 66 172 699 770 40 1 1960 YES TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD SB 527 25% 71 45 456 114 13 66 172 699 770 40 1 1960 · YES ORANGE BOULEVARD 60TH STREET SB 665 30% 65 76 616 154 17 109 247 912 996 4D I 1960 YES

60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD ·• ~~ ~~ ~: ' ;~~ ~~ ~ ~~ c - •' I ~~ ;~ ;;~ ' ; ~~ ' · ;~~~ :g :: , ~:~g ~~~ PERSIMMON BOULEVARD I NB T 870 70% 197 76 667 217 22 142 315 1165 1382 4D I 1960 YES

iSYCAMORE DRIVE SB 626 70% 116 76 1007 252 16 103 344 970 1085 4D I 1960 YES

SYCAMORE DRIVE



SOUTHERN BOULEVARD

'SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD jB ROAD

'ROAD(!)

•LE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD (140TH AVENUE

NB 1035--7~--,w------120 753 188 ... 26 --11o----~- 1369 1567 40 1/UNI 2700 YES SB 545 70% 116 108 675 219 -· 14 69 341 688 1001 4D 1/UNI 2700 YES NB 640 35% 99 227 502 126 21 138 374 1214 1313 4D I 1960 YES EB 307 --~ _50 _____ 1 -- ---y65-------e6 .-· 8 50 75 382 431 2 I 880 YES WB 528 30% 65 1 228 57 " ' 13 66 66 814 699 2 I 880 YES WB 528 30% 65 1 217 54 13 86 86 614 699 2 UNI 1440 YES WB =t 750 30% 65 86 205 51 19 - ---~ 156 906 991 2 UNI 1440 YES WB 726 25% 71 387 365 91 18 119 496 1222 1293 4D I 1960 YES

(1) TotGi Background Tr.rHc equais the higher d !he aree 'Nido gro....th rate or 1% background grCJNth plus c<rnmitled trips (Including Mrtto West). (2) Mhto Wast buildout is 2035. (3) t:lu8 to the 5-year bUJidout, ltlis &eglflWit comk:IEII"''!!d ~Stlnteruppted flow (4) Cc:I.Jnts detiwcl from turning n"!CMMmenl count (5) To becmserv.rtlve, the fNior project tratl\c was assumed to be the scme as fi.AI bulldoul wtth the excep(k:ln d Minto Wasl

X:\Doc..ment.s\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 Gl West\Ccncurmny Traffic Sludy_Augusl2015 Subm\ttal\1ndan Trails Gro>.te Tnrft'lc Report August.2015 B.K. ~!~~~~)~'-P~

chris.heggen

Typewriter


INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY

TABLE 1 - Daily Traffic Generation

10

Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 10

Single Family Detached 210 ~.315 Dwelling Units 10

Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 9.11

Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. Ln(T) = .65 Ln(X) + 5.83

Grand Totals:

TABLE 2 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ..

, . ·f:· :··>s: :~" :'.'.i ~. :t~&-;~t;;~···rr~~}.@:fE ,~.\: .:;~,\ }:~· ITE ;~};:ir~:;.~'· lntensit~···~i ,~ >t~ ;~·~~- ''·1~'1 R~te/E~uati~~ :)t0j~}~3i

Dir Split .•. Land use ·· ·b··· ... ··"·· Code In Out Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75

Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75

Single Family Detached 210 1,315 Dwelling Units 0.75 0.25 0.75

Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 0.56 0.62 0.38

Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 0.96 0.62 0.38

Grand Totals:

TABLE 3 - PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ..

''''·?~! ··. · ··· . ITE ~~; 1\.•Pv! Intensity < · .. · .. ;c\~0.: .. ~?~ ·.~g• " ' "1J~~:~ Dir Split

Land use Code· Rate/Equation In Out Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37

Single Family Detached 210 1,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37

Single Family Detached 210 1,315 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.63 0.37

Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 0.55 0.48 0.52

Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln(X) + 3.31 0.48 0.52

Grand Totals:

X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_07.16.15 Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_07.16.15 B.K.

13,140

13,140

13,150

389

11,504

51,323

06/01/2015 Revised: 07/16/2015

Gross Trips ., In \• Out Total 246 740 986

246 740 986

246 740 986

15 9 24

134 82 216

887 2,311 3,198

Gross Trips •.;., In

672

672

673

11

495

2,523

Out Total 395 1,067

395 1,067

395 1,068

12 23

537 1,032

1,734 4,257

~ SIMMO~S'&wt-ITE '"'1-.lll!l'lllt: 1 ••o~~~"ltiJ 1 ta~t:u ~r4 ttt•.· t t.illiltf Itt~

chris.heggen

Typewriter

Source: Indian Trails Grove LUPA Traffic Study, Simmons & White, Inc., 7/16/15


TABLE 4- Dailv Traffic Generation ITE

Land use Code Single Family Detached 210

-------~---

Church/Synagoguec 560 42,689 389 389

Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 11,504 1,741 9,763

Grand Totals: 51,323 3,482 47,841

TABLE 5 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ITE

~- , Intensity '"~;f~lt~ Gross Trips Internalization '!f~.~c ·,··-' External Trips

··. Landuse Code , In ' Out Total % ;·.: ~ In ''· Out Total In Out Total Single Family Detached 210 3,943 Dwelling Units 738 2,220 2,958 1.1% 11 22 33 727 2,198 2,925

-·---- ·--Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 15 9 24 0.0% 0 0 0 15 9 24 Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 134 82 216 15.3% 22 11 33 112 71 183

Grand Totals: 887 2,311 3,198 2.1% 33 33 66 854 2,278 3,132

TABLE 6- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation ITE lnte~~ity . '), ,·;}~,\:;! , Gross Trips ~":Zl,lnternalization ~:;~~: - . External Trips

Land use Code In Out Total Yo ' In ''' Out Total In Out Total Single Family Detached 210 3,943 Dwelling Units 2,017 1,185 3,202 7.7% 183 64 247 1,834 1,121 2,955

Church/Synagogue 560 42,689 S.F. 11 12 23 0.0% 0 0 0 11 12 23

Gen. Commercial 820 225,000 S.F. 495 537 1,032 23.9% 64 183 247 431 354 785

Grand Totals: 2,523 1,7~ 4,257- __1!.6% 247 247 494 2,265 1,475 3,740

Notes:

06/01/2015 Revised: 07/16/2015

0.0% 0

15.3% 1,764 7,999

3.4% 1,764 46,077

;;r~; :,, Local Capture"' ~,,, ,,,~,~; In > Out Trips

~·· Net Trips I

In '' Out Total 0.0% 0 0 0 727 2198 2925

0.0% 0 0 0 15 9 24 11.6% 16 9 25 96 62 158 0.8% 16 9 25 838 2,269 3,107

~ft- ~\Locr~ ~a~~;e<1 lT;:~~\ Net Trips ·: :.:. In · Out Total

0.0% 0 0 0 1834 1121 2955 0.0% 0 0 0 11 12 23 19.1% 51 146 197 380 208 588

4.6% 51 146 197 2,225 1,341 3,566

(1) Local capture indicates the trip interaction between the Indian Trails commercial use and the residential lots west of Seminole Pratt Whitney Road and north of 60th Street North. A modified internal capture calculation was conducted to estimate these trips. (2) Net trips indicate trips that travel to the external thoroughfare roadway network (Seminole Pratt Whitney Road).

X:\Documents\PROJECTS\2014\14-096 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_07.16.15 Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_07.16 .15 B.K.

~~.~, ' - ~- - '\, SIMMONS('\. WHITE

t~J.HIHIIi\111 I ·~~~'ll~lltl I tll"f\ll,t>IU I 11 .. 4:t 191~

chris.heggen

Typewriter


z~~®@ @ lMI.L ~lnll'i

® :W~Q 3SVHO::Ilc1331S

®

®

L

a~A:nnos SIB I

a~A:nnos

®

®

®

® ®® ~

~ ® ® ®

co

~® ® @)

®

avo~ srnw.:1 lSIOH38

® AVM ~£18SNVS

~ ®~ ~

® ffi@ @) ~ ~ ~ "' :::>

~ ® a:: @) i:;j® ® CO N

31VlS

® ®~ AVM

lVOOliM ~ :::> 0

® @)

® co

l'ilVd ® a~A:nnos

® lVAml

OOOM!S3~o 0 a~A:nnos \!V lliH

® AVM>I~d lS3M Sl'ilVd 153!IO.:I

® ®

®

~ I~.NS

A!I!Nnoo NOn

3:M:U. 3n18 :>18

® :w~

lS3!!Ql S>INI8

w u z w

~ ~

!Z w

"' "-'3

z ~ 0 0

5 0 co !" (/}

::> V>

~ i'5

B ~

~~~

chris.heggen

Typewriter


~

@ PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

SIMM~TE --·· ···---···-·-··--·-· ·~- · ~Hn•"• , ·•~n,.• - • , C~IOIIH!IIOI I i"tN CE, 1112

Author!~ lolc. 3452 2:581 ~ntr• 8"-d YtQl•S\IItll 3•w..t Polrn &.«h. F'l«<do 33407•(581) 478- 1848 (;;;'\

ASSIGNMENT REGIONAL PARK ~ e SITE ACCESS (22%) -@ ASSIGNMENT FUTURE Q Q NORTHLAKE BLVD

PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL '..:::y ~

* 15% OVERAUL MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT

MINTO WEST

FIGURE 18 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

HAMUN BLVD 18X _j I @ ,. ~X ...

§ ORANGE BLVD lJ:I _j

ax 1

1r .... 0 1r .... ""'

0 IDtPLE BLVD

@ ORANGE BLVD

@) jt(~ § OTH STREET

3ll_j~ 12,;-~ 32ll t ~MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT

TOWN CENTER PARKWAY

~I§ § PERSit.lt.ION BOULEVARD

MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENTS

~ D..

~

~I§ Vl

J N.T.S.

INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 14-096 BK 07-1 5-1 5

chris.heggen

Typewriter


ðêñðïñîðïëÎ»ª·»¼æ ðéñïêñîðïë

ROADWAY FROM

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD -ORANGE BOULEVARD -

SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE

60TH STREET SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

ORANGE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD

ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD

COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD

ROADWAY FROM

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD -ORANGE BOULEVARD -SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

60TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE

60TH STREET SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 140TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

ORANGE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD

ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD

COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD

NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 140TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD

Notes:


TABLE 7 (YEAR 2040)

MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY- NET INCREASE

PROJECT: INDIAN TRAILS

EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE: RR-10/AP TRIPS PER DAY= 3,650

PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE: RR-1.25 TRIPS PER DAY= 46,077 TRIP INCREASE= 42,427

DISTRIBUTION PROJECT

TO %1 TRAFFIC

ORANGE BOULEVARD 7% 2,970 -60TH STREET 11% 4,667 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 38% 16,122 --SYCAMORE DRIVE 28% 11,880 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 24% 10,183 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 15% 6 364 BROAD 8% 3 394 140TH AVENUE 5% 2,121 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 140TH AVENUE 14% 5,940 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 13% 5 516 140TH AVENUE 9% 3,818 COCONUT BOULEVARD 7% 2,970 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 60TH STREET 5% 2,121 ORANGE BOULEVARD 1% 424 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 1% 424 140TH AVENUE - 21% 8,910 COCONUT BOULEVARD 21% 8,910 -IBIS ROAD 22% 9 334

2040 PBC MPO

MINTO WEST PREVIOUS APPROVAL: MINTO WEST CURRENT APPROVAL:

tiEL

2040 COST

Daily Trips(2J

35,831 63,562 27 731

FEASIBLE LOS "D" TRIP PROJECT

LAI\IES CAPACITY INCREASE SIGNIFICANCE(1l

4D 33,200 8.95% YES 4D 33,200 14.06% YES 4D 33,200 48.56% YES -4D 33,200 35.78% YES 4D 33,200 30.67% YES 4D 33 200 19.17% YES 4D 33 200 10.22% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES 2 15,200 39.08% YES 2 15 200 36.29% YES 2 15,200 25.12% YES 2 15,200 19.54% YES 2 15,200 13.95% YES

4D 33,200 6.39% YES 2 15,200 2.79% NO 2 15,200 2.79% NO

4D 33,200 26.84% YES 4D 33,200 26.84% YES 4D 33 200 28.11% YES

TRAFFIC JISTRIBUTim PROJECT MINTO TRIP

ASSIGN.

NEW MINTO TRIPS(2l

TOTAL 2040

TRAFFIC TO VOLUME 1%1 TRAFFIC

ORANGE BOULEVARD 30,000 7% 2,970 20% 5,546 38,516 -60TH STREET 26,300 11% 4,667 27% 7,487 38,454 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 35,700 38% 16,122 32% 8,874 60,696 --SYCAMORE DRIVE 35,700 28% 11,880 38% 10,538 58,117 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 37,000 30% 12,728 33% 9,151 58,879 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 22400 15% 6 364 22% 6 101 34 865 BROAD 22 600 8% 3 394 10% 2 773 28 767 140TH AVENUE 13,000 5% 2,121 18% 4,992 20,113 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 16 800 5% 2 121 16.5% 4 576 23 497 140TH AVENUE 200 14% 5,940 0% 0 6,140 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 9 000 15% 6 364 16% 4 437 19 801 140TH AVENUE 8,600 9% 3,818 3% 832 13,250 COCONUT BOULEVARD 9,200 7% 2,970 2.5% 693 12,863 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 12400 5% 2 121 0.0% 0 14 521 60TH STREET 19400 5% 2 121 0.5% 139 21 660 ORANGE BOULEVARD 10,300 1% 424 5% 1,387 12,111 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 6,900 1% 424 2% 555 7,879 140TH AVENUE - 18,100 21% 8,910 16% 4,437 31,447 COCONUT BOULEVARD - 32,000 21% 8,910 16% 4,437 45,347 IBIS ROAD 33,300 22% 9,334 20% 5,546 48,180

1) Project is significant when net trip increase is greater than 1% for v/c of 1.4 or more, 2% for v/c of 1.2 or more and 3% for v/c less than 1.2.

LOS "D" VIC

LANES CAPACITY RATIO

4D 33,200 1.16 4D 33,200 1.16 4D 33,200 1.83 4D 33,200 1.75 4D 33,200 1.77 4D 33 200 1.05 4D 33 200 0.87

40(3) 33,200 0.61 2 15 200 1.55 2 15,200 0.40 2 15 200 1.30 2 15,200 0.87 2 15,200 0.85 2 15 200 0.96

4D 33 200 0.65 2 15,200 0.80 2 15,200 0.52

4D 33,200 0.95 4D 33,200 1.37 4D 33,200 1.45

2) The 2040 PBC MPO mcxlel volumes did not account for the newly approved Minto West plan of development. Therefore, the difference between the new approval and the previous approved Minto West trips were induded in this analysis. Note that this methodology provides a conservative analysis since it does not reflect any diversions created by the introduction of the significant non-residentails uses in the area. 3) Per Minto West approval.

chris.heggen

Typewriter




APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM

Gen

eral

note

onin

tere

stpr

ojec

tions

:

Inte

rest

earn

ings

onga

sta

xes

are

show

non

this

shee

t.In

tere

stea

rnin

gson

impa

ctfe

esre

mai

nw

ithin

each

impa

ctfe

ear

eaan

dar

eno

tsho

wn

abov

e.

AFD

OT

(ant

icip

ates

CIG

Pfu

nds)

upto

$2,8

80,0

00fo

rrig

ht-o

f-way

acqu

isiti

onof

Con

gres

sAv

e.,N

.ofN

orth

lake

Blv

d.to

Alt.

A-1

-Ain

FY20

17.

FDO

T(a

ntic

ipat

esC

IGP

fund

s)up

to$3

50,0

00fo

rcon

stru

ctio

nof

Nor

thla

keBl

vd.a

ndM

ilita

ryTr

ailI

nter

sect

ion

inFY

2017

.

Addi

tiona

lfun

dsin

clud

e$7

,000

,000

from

the

Atla

ntic

Ave.

Agre

emen

t.

Proj

ectio

nsfo

rint

eres

tear

ning

sas

sum

eth

atav

erag

eca

shba

lanc

esw

illap

prox

imat

e3.

0tim

esth

ecu

rren

tyea

rrev

enue

proj

ectio

nsat

anin

tere

stra

teof

3%in

FY20

16th

ruFY

2020

.

Page 2 of 5

PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sIN 1,000'8)

Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 2015

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION

Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase

6th Ave. S. over Lake Osborne Dr. Bridge Replacement 1,200 DIR 150 R 6,000 c --45th. Street E. of Haverhill Rd. toW. of Military Trail 0.1 mi, 6 L 50 D 50 R

Admin. Support/Equipment Countywide Staff support and Computer Equip. for Program 370 p 370 p 370 p 370 p 370 p

Annual Contract Advertising Countywide Advertising 20 p 20 p 20 p 20 p 20 p

Atlantic Ave. Florida's Turnpike Intersection Improvements 1,500 c --

Australian Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements .!Z!!...£_ I 1,500 c

Australian Ave. W 10th St. to 330' N ofW 13th. St Intersection Improvements 100 R/C ---720 DIR

I 6,000 DIM/C

Benoist Farms Rd. S.R. 80 to Belvedere Rd. 0.9 mi, 3 L

Boynton Beach Blvd. Florida's Turnpike Southbound Entrance/Exit Intersection Improvements

Camino Real Rd./Boca Club over Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Rehabilitation

700 R

801 p

5,200 c

Center St. Thelma Ave. to Woodland Estates Dr. 0.3 mi, 3 L 800 c ---

Church St. Limestone Creek Rd. toW. of Central Blvd. 0.5 mi , 3 L 200 RIM 1,200 c

Clint Moore Rd. over LWDD E-4 Canal E. of Congress Ave. to E. of L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal 0.3 mi , 6 L (Bridge Replacement) 150 D 100 R 1,500 c

Congress Ave. over W.P.B. "F" Canal N. of Okeechobee Blvd. to Ware Dr. 0.1 mi, 5 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 50 R 500 c --

Congress Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements 400 R 2,000 c ---Congress Ave. N. of Northlake Blvd. to Alt. A-1-A 0.6 mi, 2 L & 3 L 5,760 RIM 5,000 c

Connector Lyons Rd. to Acme Dairy Rd. 0.5 mi, 2/3 L 1,250 c

Coral Ridge Dr. S. County Regional Park N. Entrance to 750' N. 0.1 mi, 2 L 800 c

CR 880 (Old SR 80 ) Rehabilitationll-leavy Maintenance Rehabilitation 1,000 c 1,000 c 1,000 c 1,000 c

CR 880 (Old SR 80 ) over C-51 Canal Bridge Replacement 2,200 c

Drexel Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-2 Canal Fair Green Rd. to 15th Ln. N. 0.1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 700 c

Flavor Pict Rd. S.R. 7 to Lyons Rd. 1.0 mi, 2 L 60 DIR 4,500 c

Florida Mango Rd. over LWDD L-9 &. L-10 Canals I 10th Ave. North to Edgewater Drive 0.9 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacements) 650 DIR 100 R 3,300 c

Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-8 Canal Edgewater Drive to Barbados Rd. 0.6 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 50 R 1,600 c

Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-6 Canal N. of Myrica Rd. to Summit Blvd. 0.5 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 100 R 1,900 c --Garden Rd. over FOOT Canal S. of FOOT Canal to S of Blue Heron Blvd. 0.3 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 1,200 c

Gateway Blvd. Military Trail Intersection Improvements 500 R 1,100 c

*See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment

Page 3 of 5





Gateway Blvd. High Ridge Rd Intersection Improvements 100 R 1,060 c

Glades Area R&R Throughout the Glades Rep ai r/R e co nstru ctio n 700 c 700 c 700 c 700 c 700 c

Glades Rd. Butts Rd. Intersection Improvements 100 RIP 300 C/P

Haverhill Rd. Lantana Rd. to S. of LWDD L-14 Canal 0.9 mi, 4 L 3,500 c

Haverhill Rd. S. of LWDD L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.3 mi, 5 L 8,800 RIM/C

Haverhill Rd. N. of Caribbean Blvd. to Bee Line Hwy. 1.6 mi, 5 L 500 DIM/C 9,000 c

Hood Rd. E. of Florida's Turnpike toW. of Central Blvd. 1.2 mi , 4L 6,400 c

Hood Rd. Central Blvd. Intersection Improvements 200 RIM 1,000 c

Indiantown Rd. Jupiter Fanns Rd. Intersection Improvements 750 c

Jog Rd. S. of Clint Moore Rd., to Linton Blvd. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,500 c

Jog Rd. S. of Hypoluxo Rd. to 10th Ave. N. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 2,100 c

Jog Rd. Roebuck Rd. Intersection Improvements 920 D/C

Kirk Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal S. of L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal to Pot O'Gold St. 0.1 mi , 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 800 c

Lake Worth Rd.

Linton Blvd. 380 R

630 c

I 1,500 c

Jog Rd. Intersection Improvements

Military Tr. Intersection Improvements

Lyons Rd. Hillsboro Canal to S.W. 18th Street 0.3 mi, 6 L 2,000 c --

Lyons Rd. Clint Moore Rd. to Atlantic Ave. 3.0 mi, 4 L 100 D 9,700 c

Lyons Rd. Lantana Rd. toN. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal 0.9 mi , 4 L 6,120 c

Lyons Rd. N. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.1 mi,4L 400 D/R 5,000 c --

Lyons Rd. Lake Worth Rd. to S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal 0.5 mi, 3 L 250 D 2,500 c

Lyons Rd. S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal toN. of L.W.D.D. L-10 Canal 0.6 mi, 2/3 L 100 p

Northlake Blvd. E. of Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. to E. of Hall Blvd. 1.0 mi,4L 100 D 3,000 c

Northlake Blvd. E. of Hall Blvd. to Coconut Blvd. 2.4 mi, 4 L 2,000 RIM 9,200 c --

Northlake Blvd. S.R. 710 to Military Tr. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,500 c

Northlake Blvd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,000 c --

Okeechobee Blvd. Church St. Intersection Improvements 1,000 R 1,200 c

Old Dixie Hwy. Yamato Rd. to Linton Blvd. 3.0 mi, 3 L 2,000 RIM 10,350 c


Page 4 of 5





Old Dixie Hwy. Park Ave. to Northlake Blvd. 0.9 mi, 3 L 3,500 c

Palmetto Park Rd. E. of Military Trail to 1-95 Intersection Improvements 200 DIM 800 c

Palmetto Park Rd. over L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal (EI Rio Canal) Bridge Replacement 2,900 c

Palmetto Park Rd. Bascule Bridge over Intracoastal Waterway Rehab/Painting 2,500 c

Pathway Program Countywide Pathways 1,500 DIR/C 1,500 D/R/C 1,500 D/R/C 1,500 DIR/C 1,500 DIR/C

PGA Blvd. Central Blvd. Intersection Improvements 500 c

PGA Blvd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,800 c

PGA Blvd. Ellison Wilson Rd. Intersection Improvements 490 c

Purdy Ln. over LWDD E-3 Canal Forest Hill Elem. To E. Major Dr. 0.2 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 2,300 R/C

Recording Fees Countywide Right-of-Way 20 R 20 R 20 R 20 R 20 R

Reserve-Bridges/Culverts/Pipes Countywide Rehab./Repair/Replacement 1,050 S/0/RIM/C 1,480 S/DIR/M/C 1,100 S/DIRIM/C 1,850 S/0/RIM/C 700 DIR/M/C

R e se rv e-lnte rsecti on s Countywide Design, R/W, Mitigation & Construction 3,600 DIR/M/C 3,840 DIR/MIC 3,250 D/RIM/C 500 D/R/M/C 3,750 DIR/M/C

Reserve-Pavement Markings Countywide Pavement Markings 400 DIR/C

Reserve-Plans/Align. Countywide Study, Design & Mitigation 200 S/D/M 200 S/DIM 200 S/DIM 200 S/D/M 200 S/D/M

Reserve-Railroad Crossings Countywide Rehabilitation/Upgrade 600 D/C/P 600 D/C/P 600 D/CIP 600 D/CIP 600 D/C/P

Reserve-Resurfacing Countywide Resurfacing 2,000 DIR/C

Reserve-R/W Countywide Land Acquisition 200 R 200 R 200 R 200 R 200 R

Reserve-Traffic Calming Countywide Minor Improvements 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C 20 D/C

Reserve-Traffic Signals Countywide Mast Arms 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C 600 D/C

Roebuck Rd. S.R. 7 to Jog Rd. 3.0 mi, 4 L 100 DIM

Roebuck Rd. Jog Rd. to Haverhill Rd. 1.0 mi, 5 L 250 DIR 3,200 c

Royal Palm Beach Blvd. M-Canal to S. of Orange Blvd. 1.0 mi, 3/5 L 300 RIM 3,700 c

Sandalfoot Blvd. over LWDD E-1 Canal State Road 7 0.1 mi, 5 L (Bridge Replacement) 1,850 c

Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. Orange Blvd. to S. of Northlake Blvd. 1.8 mi, 4/6 L 7,400 c

Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. Northlake Blvd. Intersection Improvements 4,200 c

Sherwood Forest Blvd. over L.W.D.D. L-8 Canal Bridge Improvements 500 c

Silver Beach Rd. E. of Congress Ave. to Old Dixie Hwy. 0.9 mi, 2 L & 3 L 4,080 c


Page 5 of 5





Southern Blvd. Lyons Rd./Sanbury's Way Intersection Improvements 2,100 p

S.R. 7 S.R. 710 to S. of 150th Ct. N. Right-of-Way 50 RIP

S.W. 3rd. St. over LWDD E-1 Canal State Road 7 0.1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 1,850 c

S.W.18th St. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1,500 c

Toney Penna Dr. Old Dixie Hwy. Intersection Improvements 200 c

Woolbright Rd. Military Tr. to Lawrence Rd. Resurfacing, Safety and Drainage Improvements 1,100 c

Project Totals 1 57,8901 1101,2701 ~ ~ 1 25,9801
