investments in transport infrastructure (2007-2016) in brazil and preparations for the world cup...
TRANSCRIPT
Investments in transport infrastructure (2007-2016) in
Brazil and preparations for the World Cup 2014 and Olympic
Games Rio 2016
André DantasTechnical Director
1.Context
2.Federal investments 2007-2016
3.Urban mobility investments
4.Rio de Janeiro
5.Lessons
6.What´s next?
Outline
1. Context
1. Context
• GDP: US$ 2,3 trillion
• World’s 7th economy
• 85% in Urban Areas
• Roads:
– 1’713’885 km • 202’589 km paved roads
– 23,8 km/1’000 km2
Equator
30o SParallel
30o NParallel
ArcticCircle
AntarcticCircle
North Pole
South Pole
First worldcountries
Brazil
0
50
100
150
200
250
1900 1919 1938 1957 1976 1995 2014 2033 2050
Populational growth - Brazil
Pe
op
le (
Mill
ion
)
YearSource: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE)
1. Context
0
1.000.000
2.000.000
3.000.000
4.000.000
5.000.000
6.000.000
7.000.0002
00
3
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
2014: 3,9 million
2020: 5,8 million
Source: (Federação Nacional da Distribuição de Veículos Automotores) FENABRAVE 2003-2013
KPMG 2014-2020 – Previsão de Venda
Automobiles sales - Brazil
Un
itie
s
Year
2003: 1,4 million
Percentual de crescimento 2003 – 2014: 179%2014 – 2020: 49%
1. Context
29,5 31,9
34,3 36,7
39,2 42,1
45,4 49,6
54,5 59,4
64,8
70,5
76,1 80,2
20,0 21,2 23,0 23,7 24,9 26,3 27,9 29,9 32,1
34,5 37,2
39,8 42,7 44,7
4,0 4,5 5,7 6,1 7,0 8,1 9,4 11,1 13,0 14,6 16,7 18,3 19,9 21,0
0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,30,4
0,4 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5
1,2 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total Automobiles Motorcycles Bus Truck
Source: Departamento Nacional de Trânsito (DENATRAN)
Un
itie
s (m
illio
n)
Year
Fleet composition - Brazil
1. Context
0
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: Associação Nacional de Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores – ANFAVEA (Brasil)
Bus production - Brazil
Year
Un
itie
s (t
ho
usa
nd
)
1. Context
2. FEDERAL INVESTIMENTS2007-2016
2. Federal Investments
Public and private investments in transport
(R$
bill
ion
)
Investment per transport mode
(R$
bill
ion
)
2. Federal Investments
PAC1
Acceleration GrowthProgram (PAC)
2007 20102009
Responsibility Matrix
World Cup 2014
1970 1980
MassiveInfrastructure
creation
Military regime
1990 2002
Economic and Political recovery
Financial crisis
Very limited and punctualInvestments
PAC2
Federal Gov.
Planning Ministry
Recording
Selection
Approval
Execution
PAC 2
PAC 1
Social and urban infrastructure
Energy
Logistics
Rodways
Railways
Ports
Waterways
Airports
Water and Light
Transports
Better cities
Communities
Energy
Housing
Roadways
Railways
Ports
Waterways
Airports
Countryside roads
Sewage treatment
Drainage
Urban Mobility
Pavements
Historical Cities
Digital cities
2. Federal Investments
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Roadways Railway Ports Waterways Airports CoastalShipping
Subways Total
Inve
stm
en
t (U
S$)
Type of investment
PAC 1
PAC 2
Post 2014
2. Federal Investments
2. Federal Investments
Bridge over the Madeira River
2. Federal Investments
7’002 km of roadways, tunnels and bridges under construction in all Brazilian Regions
63% Finished 20% Finished
2. Federal Investments
61% Finished
West-East Integration Railway
2. Federal Investments
98% Finished
Fortaleza Port
2. Federal Investments
Natal Port
3. URBAN MOBILITY
Brazilian cities with organized public transport
3.313 municipalities
Daily bus trips
40 milhões
Direct jobs
537.000
Urban Bus Companies
1.800
Bus fleet operating regular services in urban areas
107.000 vehicles
Travel distance produced by bus
7,9 billion km
Indirect jobs
1,7 million
Diesel oil consumed by urban bus services
3,3 billion litres
Bus mode87% of daily public transport trips in urban areas
3. Urban mobility
Urban Public transport by bus
3. Urban mobility
Urban public transport by rail
(million passengers/year)
972,7 km ofurban railways
0
50
100
150
200
250
BRT Corridor Train Subway Monorail LRT Airtrain Cable car ITS Roadworks
Others Total
115
0 0 0 2 0 0 3
20
6
47
10
33
18
1 5 3 0 1 1 2
65
12
37
0 0 0 2 2 3 3
17 21
97
34
75
311
19 5 3 7
3829
215
#Pro
ject
s
Type of project
WC 2014 PAC 2 - Great Cities PAC 2 Medium Cities Total
3. Urban Mobility investments
3. Urban Mobility investments
Status of projects
* Some cities possess BRT Systems, Bus Lanes and Exclusive Lanes simultaneously.
Sources: National Association of Urban Transportation Companies-NTU
Ministry of Cities
Ministry of Sports
Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management
Embarq-Global BRT Data
Media survey
Type Cities * Projects Length (KM)
Status
In operationUnder
Construction
Bidding
processesPreparatory action Licensing Expected
BRT 28 65 1.285,5 17 20 3 13 1 11
Bus Lanes 55 128 1.021,4 32 16 8 62 1 9
Exclusive
Lanes32 111 1.148,2 87 4 - - - 20
Total 72 304 3.455,1 136 40 11 75 2 40
3. Urban Mobility investments
Original concept of BRT
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil (1975-2011).
3. Urban Mobility investments
BRT: transport system thatcontributes to improving lifequality
High capacity vehiclesModern stations
Same level boarding
Exclusive Busways
Pre-paid fares
Original concept of BRT
3. Urban Mobility investments
7 States9 Cities 18 BRT
314,5 km
1 BRT
System
35,0KM
7 BRT
Systems
81,4 KM
1 BRT
System
12,0 KM
1 BRT
System
10,5KM
2 BRT
Systems
90,0KM
1 BRT
System
17,0KM
1 BRT
System
7,5KM
2 BRT
Systems
22,0KM
2 BRT
Systems
39,1KM
2015
19 States33 Cities92 BRT
902,3 km
2025
19 States33 Cities
Nº Descrição Cidade UF Status Extensão (km)
1 BRT MOVE Antônio Carlos/Pedro I Belo Horizonte MG Em operação 16,02 BRT MOVE Área Central Belo Horizonte MG Obras 1,5
3 BRT MOVE Cristiano Machado Belo Horizonte MG Em operação 6,04 Corredor Pedro II Belo Horizonte MG Obras 5,6
5 BRT Mário Andreazza Cuiabá MT Obras 10,0
6 Corredor Aeroporto/Rodoferroviária - Trecho Estadual Curitiba PR Obras Não disponibilizado7 Corredor Aeroporto/Rodoferroviária - Trecho Municipal Curitiba PR Obras Não disponibilizado
8 BRT: Extensão da Linha Verde Sul Curitiba PR Obras 1,79 BRT Alberto Craveiro Fortaleza CE Obras 3,0
10 BRT Avenida Dedé Brasil Fortaleza CE Obras 6,0
11 BRT Avenida Paulino Rocha Fortaleza CE Obras 2,012 Corredor Estruturante - Zona Norte/Estádio Arena das Dunas Natal RN Obras 16,3
13 BRT Norte/Sul - Trecho Igarassu/Tacaruna/Centro do Recife Recife PE Em operação 33,314 BRT: Leste/Oeste - Ramal Cidade da Copa Recife PE Em operação 5,8
15 Corredor Caxangá (Leste/Oeste) Recife PE Obras 12,5
16 BRT Transcarioca (Aeroporto/Penha/Barra) Rio de Janeiro RJ Em operação 39,0158,7TOTAL
BRT projects for the World Cup 2014
3. Urban Mobility investments
# Description City LengthOperation
Construction
Operation
Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
NA
NA
Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
Operation
Operation
Operation
Construction
4. RIO DE JANEIRO
4. Rio de Janeiro
Capital of Brazil from 1763 to 1960
City Population : 6.4 million
Metropolitan Area : 12.1 million
(> Belgium, Greece or Portugal)
95% in Urban Areas
GDP: 260 US$ billion
(about 10% of the national value)
Municipal government
FETRANSPOR
(Bus Companies)
Stategoverment
• Unions: 10
• Bus companies: 208
• Fleet: 21.200
• Pax/month: 240 million
• Trips/monthh: 4,5 million
•Direct Jobs: 100.000
• Fleet av. age: 4,7 years
• Km/month: 150 million
• Tax/year: US$ 600 million
Source: FETRANSPOR (2013)
4. Rio de Janeiro
Transport system – 2010
4. Rio de Janeiro
4. Rio de Janeiro
Transport system – 2014
4. Rio de Janeiro
Transport system – 2016
Legenda
TransBrasilTransOesteTransCariocaTransOlímpicaMetroFerrovia
Transit Oriented Development regions
4. Rio de Janeiro
Public transport modal split
Source: FETRANSPOR (2013)
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRS – Bus Rapid Services
Avenida Presidente Vargas
4. Rio de Janeiro
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRS – Bus Rapid Services
Source: City of Rio de Janeiro (2014)
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Services Original Fleet Rationalization (%)
Copacabana 91 1360 20
Ipanema/Leblon 64 1062 10
Rio Branco 93 1545 10
Antônio Carlos 82 1391 10
Estácio 57 1104 -
Tijuca 33 765 -
Source: City of Rio de Janeiro (2014)
BRS – Bus Rapid Services
4. Rio de Janeiro
Source: City of Rio de Janeiro (2014)
BRT systems
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Length StationsOperational
dateTravel demand(thousand/day)
Cost (US$ million)
Articulatedbuses
TransOeste 59 km 59 2012 170 533 119
TransCarioca 39 km 48 2014 340 mil / dia 633 157
TransOlímpica 23 km 14 2015 79 mil / dia 600 60
TransBrasil 32 km 32 2016 500 mil / dia 500 400
Source: City of Rio de Janeiro (2014)
BRT systems
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Transoeste
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Transoeste
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Transcarioca
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT Transcarioca
Operational Control Centre
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT station
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT station
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT vehicle
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT vehicle
4. Rio de Janeiro
BRT VEHICLE
4. Rio de Janeiro
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
FREEWAY CICLOPATH
CABLE CAR
LRT
VIA BINÁRIO DO PORTO
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
Rio’s LRT
• 28 km of rails
• Integrating with metro, trains, ferries, cable car, buses and Santos Dumont Airport
• Operation will begin in 2016
• Integrated toPorto Maravilha project
Reshaping the city for the Olympic Games 2016
4. Rio de Janeiro
For more information see: www.portomaravilha.com.br/web/cepac/index.html
• Change of land use and expansion of the construction potential of land
• Contribution charges for using the new building potential through Cepacs
(Certificates of Additional Potential Construction).
Free of charge
IAT* = 1
*IAT – Land Usage Index
$ collected through Cepacs used to pay construction and urban services Additional Potential
(with Cepacs charging)
5. Lessons
5. Lessons
• Focus on the LEGACY is critical to overcome barriers and producetransformation;
• Lack of strong, qualified and well-equipped private and public organizationscontributed to:
• Decision-making influenced by political actors;
• Poor design;
• Additional costs;
• Operational problems; and
• Frustrations.
• To improve quality, there must be the understanding of costingimplications;
• Continuous funding, planning, monitoring and transparency should be partof all public policies at all levels;
5. Lessons
5. Lessons
6. What´s next?
6. What´s next?
• Economical and political crises;
• Many projects still under construction;
• Considerable infrastructure gap to meet existingdemand;
• Realisation that municipalities require technicalassistance to conceptualize, design, manage andexecute projects;
• Major discussion about the effectiveness ofinfrastructure investments;
• ….