investment decisions npv 2014

34
Investment Decisions -Net Present Value and others-

Upload: -

Post on 26-Sep-2015

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

decisions investment

TRANSCRIPT

  • Investment Decisions -Net Present Value and others-

  • Capital-Budgeting

    The process of decision making with respect to investments in fixed assets that is, should a proposed project be accepted or rejected.

    It is easier to evaluate profitable projects than to find them.

    2

  • Source of Ideas for projects

    Within the Firm: Typically, a firm has a research & development (R&D) department that searches for ways of improving existing products or finding new projects.

    Other sources: Competition, Suppliers, Customers

    3

  • Capital-Budgeting Decision Criteria

    1. Net Present Value

    2. Internal Rate of Return

    3. Payback Period

    4. Profitability Index

    5. Capital Rationing

    4

  • Net Present Value or NPV

    NPV is equal to the present value of all future free cash flows less the investments initial outlay. It measures the net value of a project in todays dollars. NPV = FCF - Initial outlay

    (1+k)n

    Decision Rule:

    If NPV > 0, accept If NPV < 0, reject

    5

  • NPV Example

    Example: Project with an initial cash outlay of $60,000 with following free cash flows for 5 years.

    Yr FCF

    Initial outlay -60,000

    1 25,000

    2 24,000

    3 13,000

    4 12,000

    5 11,000

    The firm has a 15% required rate of return.

    6

  • NPV = - Initial outlay + FCF

    (1+k)n

    PV of FCF = $60,764

    Subtracting the initial cash outlay of $60,000 leaves an NPV of $764.

    Since NPV>0, project is feasible.

    7

  • NPV in Excel

    Input cash flows for initial outlay and inflows in cells A1 to A6

    In cell A7 type the following formula:

    =A1+npv(.15,a2:a6)

    Excel will give the NPV = $764

    8

  • NPV Trade-offs

    Benefits

    Considers cash flows, not profits

    Considers all cash flows

    Recognizes time value of money

    By accepting only positive NPV projects, increases value of the firm

    Drawbacks

    Requires detailed long-term forecast of cash flows

    NPV is considered to be the most theoretically correct criterion for evaluating capital-budgeting projects.

    9

  • Internal Rate of Return or IRR

    IRR is the discount rate that equates the present value of a projects future net cash flows with the projects initial cash outlay

    Decision Rule:

    If IRR > Required rate of return, accept

    IF IRR < Required rate of return, reject

    10

  • 11

  • IRR and NPV

    If NPV is positive, IRR will be greater than the required rate of return

    If NPV is negative, IRR will be less than required rate of return

    If NPV = 0, IRR is the required rate of return.

    12

  • IRR Example

    Initial Outlay: $3,817

    Cash flows:

    Yr.1=$1,000, Yr. 2=$2,000, Yr. 3=$3,000

    Discount rate NPV

    15% $4,356

    20% $3,958

    22% $3,817

    IRR is 22% because the NPV equals the initial cash outlay

    13

  • Payback Period

    Number of years needed to recover the initial cash outlay of a capital-budgeting project

    Decision Rule: Project feasible or desirable if the payback period is less than or equal to the firms maximum desired payback period.

    14

  • Payback Period Example

    Example: Project with an initial cash outlay of $20,000 with following free cash flows for 5 years.

    15

    YEAR CASH FLOW BALANCE

    1 $ 8,000 ($ 12,000)

    2 4,000 ( 8,000)

    3 3,000 ( 5,000)

    4 5,000 0

    5 10,000 12,000

    Payback is 4 years

  • Trade-offs

    Benefits:

    Uses cash flows rather than accounting profits

    Easy to compute and understand

    Useful for firms that have capital constraints

    Drawbacks:

    Ignores the time value of money and

    Does not consider cash flows beyond the payback period.

    16

  • Profitability Index (PI)

    PI is the ratio of the present value of the future free cash flows to the initial outlay. It yields the same accept/reject decision as NPV.

    PI = PV FCF/ Initial outlay

    Decision Rule:

    PI > 1 = accept

    PI < 1 = reject

    17

  • PI Example

    A firm with a 10% required rate of return is considering investing in a new machine with an expected life of six years. The initial cash outlay is $50,000.

    18

  • PI Example

    FCF PVF @ 10% PV

    Initial Outlay

    -$50,000 1.000 -$50,000

    Year 1 15,000 0.909 13,636

    Year 2 8,000 0.826 6,612

    Year 3 10,000 0.751 7,513

    Year 4 12,000 0.683 8,196

    Year 5 14,000 0.621 8,693

    Year 6 16,000 0.564 9,032

    19

  • PI Example

    PI = ($13,636 + $6,612+$7,513 + $8,196 + $8,693+ $9,032) / $50,000

    =$53,682/$50,000 = 1.0736 Project PI > 1, accept.

    20

  • NPV and PI

    When the present value of a projects free cash inflows are greater than the initial cash outlay, the project NPV will be positive. PI will also be greater than 1.

    NPV and PI will always yield the same decision.

    21

  • Capital Rationing

  • Capital Rationing

    Capital rationing occurs when a limit is placed on the dollar size of the capital budget.

    How to select: Select a set of projects with the highest NPVs subject to the capital constraint. Using NPV may preclude accepting the highest ranked project in terms of PI or IRR.

    23

  • Ranking Problems

    Size Disparity

    Time Disparity

    Unequal Life

    24

  • Size Disparity This occurs when we examine mutually exclusive projects of unequal

    size.

    Example: Consider the following cash flows for one-year Project A and B, with required rates of return of 10%. Initial Outlay: A = $200 B = $1,500

    Inflow: A = $300 B = $1,900

    25

  • Size Disparity

    26

  • Size Disparity

    Which technique to use to select the better project?

    Use NPV whenever there is size disparity. If there is no capital rationing, project with the largest NPV will be selected. When capital rationing exists, select set of projects with the largest NPV.

    But, small companies uses in general IRR when capital rationing exists.

    27

  • Time Disparity Problem

    Time Disparity problems arise because of differing reinvestment assumptions made by the NPV and IRR decision criteria.

    Cash flows reinvested at:

    According to NPV: Required rate of return

    According to IRR: IRR

    28

  • Example: Consider two projects, A and B, with initial outlay of $1,000, cost of capital of 10%, and following cash flows in years 1, 2, and 3:

    1 2 3

    A: $100 $200 $2,000

    B: $650 $650 $650

    29

    Time Disparity Problem

  • 30

  • Time Disparity Problem

    Project A Project B NPV 758.83 616.45 PI 1.759 1.616 IRR 35% 43%

    Ranking Conflict: Using NPV, A is better Using IRR, B is better

    Which technique to use to select the superior project?: Use NPV (especially in lease calculations)

    31

  • Unequal Lives Problem

    This occurs when we are comparing two mutually exclusive projects with different life spans.

    To compare projects, we compute the Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA)

    32

  • Unequal Lives Problem

    Example: If you have two projects, A and B, with equal investment of $1,000, required rate of return of 10%, and following cash flows in years 1-3 (for project A) and 1-6 (for project B)

    Project A = $500 each in years 1-3

    Project B = $300 each in years 1-6

    33

  • Computing EAA

    1. Calculate projects NPV:

    A = $243.43 and B = $306.58

    2. Calculate EAA = NPV/annual annuity factor

    A = $97.89 B = $70.39

    3. Project A is better

    34