investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 6
Avai lab le a t www.sc iencedi rec t .com
j ourna l homepage : www.e lsev ier . com/ loca te /he
Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performancedegradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell
R. Lina,b,*, B. Lia,b, Y.P. Houa,b, J.M. Maa,b
aClean Energy Automotive Engineering Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinabSchool of Automotive Studies, Jiading Campus, Tongji University, 4800# Cao’an Road, Shanghai 201804, China
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 September 2008
Accepted 9 October 2008
Available online 4 February 2009
Keywords:
PEM fuel cell
Dynamic driving cycle
SEM
EIS
TEM
* Corresponding author. School of AutomotivE-mail address: [email protected] (R. L
0360-3199/$ – see front matter ª 2008 Publisdoi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.054
a b s t r a c t
Degradation of PEMFC performance under dynamic loading cycling situation was studied
by simulating automotive working conditions. A protocol of driving cycle was set up. Each
driving cycle was consisting of six different periods. The performance of the fuel cell during
driving cycle periods was represented by time-dependent voltage profiles. Polarization
curves, measured in regular intervals, revealed a changed degradation rate in different
operation periods. A rapid degradation of performance could be observed after 280 h of
operation. In contrast to the starting conditions of the MEA, the degradation of membrane
and dissolution and aggregation of catalysts were clearly visible at the end of testing.
Furthermore, after 370 h of testing, Pt was not uniformly dispersed in the catalysts layer
and some also scattered in the membrane. Cracks and gaps appeared in the catalyst layer.
This change of micro-structure corresponded to the loss of electro-chemical active area of
the MEA and the increased membrane resistance and charge transfer resistance.
ª 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Association for Hydrogen
Energy.
1. Introduction example, 5000 h is the bottommost target of automotive lifetime
Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is one promising
type of fuel cell which could be used as vehicular power source
to replace gasoline and diesel internal combustion engine.
However, some major technical issues still need to be solved for
the wide-spread marketing of fuel cell generators into the
transportation area [1]. The biggest challenge in the commer-
cialization of PEMFC is its cost and particularly durability.
The performance of fuelcell ispronetomaterial degradation.
A variety of tests running in stationary regime at roughly
nominal conditions, provide an overview of the effect of oper-
ating conditions, including the effect of reactant gas flows,
humidification levels and temperatures, on the fuel cell
performance and the corresponding morphological change of
single fuel cells or stacks [2,3]. But under steady-state operation
condition, testing times could be lengthy and costly. For
e Studies, Jiading Campuin).hed by Elsevier Ltd on be
and needs almost months running. It is generally acknowledged
that the performance of a fuel cell is impacted by the dynamic
load cycle much more strongly than by the constant load
condition [4–7]. This is because under dynamic driving cycle, the
variety of operation condition was much more dramatically
compared to the steady condition than under constant load
conditions. This may result to the oxidant starvation, local
‘‘hotspots’’ and physicaldegradation, sothe performance of fuel
cell would be much seriously degraded [6–8].
Setting up an accelerated testing was much more realistic
and necessary than the long-time steady-state testing. Many
efforts have been made to investigate the performance of PEM
fuel cell over dynamic driving cycles in the objective to
provide references for designing and manufacturing a robust
and durable air/hydrogen fuel cell for transportation applica-
tion [7–15].
s, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China. Fax:þ86-69589225.
half of International Association for Hydrogen Energy.
![Page 2: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
10
20
30
40
Cu
rren
t / A
one cycle
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 62370
Many models had been set up to exploit the effect of
dynamic change of load on the durability of PEMFC under
different operation conditions. Effect of gas flows, temperature,
water management and humidity conditions under driving
cycles were studied. Furthermore, the degradation mechanism
was discussed after different electro-chemical and physical
characterizations of fuel cell key components [7,8].
Los Alamos laboratory had operated fuel cell stack utilizing
drive cycle protocol defined by DOE modified to include shut/
down cycles every 10 cycles. It was found the voltage loss is
much seriously in the shut-down cell than no shut-down cell
and more CO2 evolution at start-up compared to shut-down.
The accelerated testing affected the hydrophobicity of gas
diffusion layer obviously and OCV changed with time at
different humidification conditions. Also potential cycling was
used as an accelerated testing method to examine the oper-
ating conditions leading to loss of electro-catalyst surface [7,8].
The durability of a 100-W stack under specific dynamical
current solicitation was linked to a vehicle road cycle to study
the impact of transport environment and the operation
conditions and to prevent stack failure. The work found the
gas flow management in applying highly dynamical current
profiles was very important for the performance of PEMFC
[13]. Escribano et al used two types of cycling test procedures
differing in operation conditions to study the degradation of
MEA. The effects of temperature, oxidizer humidification and
membrane thickness on the durability had been investigated
under the cycling test conditions. The mechanical stress
induced during on/off operation by the successive hydrogen
and dehydration decreased the lifetime of the MEA [14].
Schulze et al [15] set the operation mode at the anode as ‘‘dead
end’’ (100% utilization), with various purging intervals to
understand the degradation mechanism in the MEA. In situ
and ex situ techniques were used to evaluate the operation
effect, especially the water balance for the electro-chemical
performance and characterize the degradation process of MEA
components. Two different degradation processes were
identified, which can be used to determine degradation
values.
However, lack of understanding of most degradation
mechanism and the difficulty of performing in situ, non-
destructive structural evolution of key components made this
topic difficult and required much effort. Considering during
real road driving of a vehicle, fuel cell should go through
dynamic automotive working conditions, the aim of this study
was to design a dynamic driving cycle, which consisted of cold
starting, idle running, full power running, and continuous
loading running and even overload running periods. The
effect of driving cycles on the performance and structure
degradation of fuel cell were studied in order to find the
degradation processes and to give instruction for fuel cell
application in the area of transportation.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
Time / s
Fig. 1 – Driving cycle protocol in one cycle, evolution of
current with time during 20 min, capacity of overloading
was set at 35 A.
2. Experiment
2.1. Preparation of membrane electrode assembly (MEA)
The single fuel cell used in this study has been assembled of
MEA, gas diffusion layers and machined graphite flow
distribution plates. The MEA was fabricated via spraying
platinum catalyst ink on both sides of membrane (Nafion 112)
and followed by just physically placing gas diffusion layers
(GDLs, Toray 090) without hot-pressing process. The effective
electrode area was 50 cm2. The catalyst ink consists of 40% Pt/
C (JM Company), 5 wt.% solubilized Nafion (Dupont Company)
and isopropanol. The mass ratio of Pt/C catalyst to Nafion is
3:1. The loading of Pt/C catalysts for cathode and anode are
both at 0.4 mg cm�2.
2.2. Description of test conditions and dynamicdriving cycles
During the experiment, the fuel cell was regulated at 70 �C
with ambient back pressure. Anode and cathode sides were
100% humidified at a temperature of 85 �C, with a gas utili-
zation of 70% for H2 and 30% for air. The driving cycle exper-
iment consisted of operation of the fuel cell for about 370 h.
The dynamic driving cycles were designed by simulating real
internal engine vehicle with the consideration about cold
starting, idle running, constant load running, variable load
acceleration, full power running and overload running. Over-
load was pointed out as it normally existed when the vehicles
run on the road and plays a role of accelerating degradation. In
our experiment, every cycle consisted of six periods (by
simulating cold starting, idle running, full power running,
continuous loading running and even overload running
conditions) and lasted for 20 min. The capacity of overloading
was set at 35 A. Driving cycle protocol consisted of continu-
ously running the above cycles. The evolution of the current
related to driving cycle protocol in one cycle was presented in
Fig. 1.
2.3. Performance of fuel cell
The evolution of voltages related to the driving cycles at
different current densities was presented to show the tran-
sient response with change of dynamic load. But simply
acquiring the evolution of voltage with time will neither lead
![Page 3: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-0.0023
-0.0015
-0.0013
-0.0011
-2.76E-4
-2.70E-4
-1.88E-4
-1.04E-4
Cell P
oten
tial / V
Time /h
OCV 200 500 700
Fig. 2 – Evolution of voltage versus time under driving
cycles, respectively, at 0, 200, 500 and 700 mA/cm2 current
densities.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 6 2371
to a comprehensive understanding of the degradation mech-
anism, nor provide knowledge of the performance degrada-
tion rates. Therefore, the data collected during driving cycles
will help determine and quantify the degradation mecha-
nisms that occurred over long periods [13]. Thus, polarization
curves were recorded before and at periodic time intervals of
driving cycles, after driving cycles for a certain time to,
respectively, establish initial baseline and subsequent
performance changes in galvanostatic state.
2.4. Characterization of fuel cell
Effects of dynamic driving cycles on morphology change of
membrane and catalysts, membrane resistance and active
reaction area before and after the test were characterized. The
initial characterization performance and images of fuel cell
were achieved before beginning the driving cycles.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the MEA
were examined by a JSM-5600LV microscope to probe the
morphological changes of the electrodes and the connection
between catalyst layer and membrane. Energy dispersive
spectrometry (EDS) was used to investigate the distribution of
different elements over the MEA.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were
obtained with a Joel JEM 2010 microscope. TEM was used to
observe the particle size and distribution of Pt/C particles.
Catalyst was removed from the membrane by scraping the
catalyst layer and suspending the powder in ethanol solution.
Characterization of cyclic voltammetry (CV) was per-
formed using a VMP2/Z electro-chemical workstation. The
potential was scanned at a rate of 20 mV per second from
50 mV–1200 mV and vise versa by taking the anode electrode
as reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). A series of CV
measurements at periodic time intervals was recorded to
quantify the active catalyst surface area of the MEA.
Once the polarization curves were recorded, an impedance
technique was used to characterize the dynamic behavior of
fuel cell. electro-chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)
measurements were carried out using a VMP2/Z workstation
by a PAR model at galvanostatic mode under a constant load
of 5 A with a frequency range between 10 kHz and 100 mHz.
The entire fuel cell impedance was obtained by feeding air
into the cathode and hydrogen into the anode side. All
impedance spectra reported herein were measured between
the fuel cell cathode and anode. A series of impedance
measurements at periodic time intervals was recorded during
the experiment applying a sine wave distortion (AC pertur-
bation) of 10 mA amplitude.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Fuel cell performance degradation under dynamicdriving cycles
Fig. 2 presented the evolution of voltage versus time under
driving cycles, respectively, at 0, 200, 500 and 700 mA/cm2
current densities. It was noticed that the voltage decreased
with time whether under open circuit voltage condition or
under higher current density. After operated for 280 h, a much
more rapid decrease of voltage was observed comparing to the
period of 0–280 h. A trend associated with the evolution of fuel
cell voltage over time can be plotted, if one modulates the V–t
plot into a linear line. It could be found that during 0–280 h
operation, the evolution of voltage versus time decreased with
a rate of 0.274 mV/h, while during 280–350 h, a more rapid
degradation rate of 2.3 mV/h was found.
It was worth noting that the voltage decline trend was
linked to the impacts of the current densities. The slopes of V–
t plots increased with increasing current densities. Under
700 mA/cm2 current densities, they were almost twice as the
ones under OCV (loaded off) condition. It’s clear that degra-
dation of voltage profiles was influenced much more seriously
under higher current densities than under lower ones. It may
be due to the fact that running in higher current density fuel
cell need to output much power, which shows if the inner
structures of the fuel cell, like the connection of membrane
and catalyst, morphology of catalyst layer, particle size of
catalysts and so on, would be affected by degradation. The
structure degradation will be discussed in more detail in the
next part.
From plots of the evolution of voltage, it was found that
sometimes voltage oscillated though the trend of voltage
evolution was decreasing in time. This may be on the one
hand dueto the fluidic resistances and capacities of the gas
pipes and channels and on the other hand to the time
constants of the fuel cell gas diffusion layers.
Polarization curves of initial MEA and those measured in
time intervals (respectively, after 100, 200, 280 and 370 h
running) under driving cycles were presented in Fig. 3. It was
found that open circuit voltage (OCV) was about 0.96 V for the
fresh fuel cell. With time going on, OCV of the fuel cell
decreased gradually but a much more rapid decrease of
voltage was observed after 280 h of operation comparing to
the period of 0–280 h. It revealed that the performance of the
fuel cell decreased with driving cycles running on during 370 h
operation and the trend of degradation change happened just
after 280 h operation, which could be also found in Fig. 1.
![Page 4: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0 200 400 600 800 10000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Cell P
oten
tial / V
Current density / mA.cm2
0 h 100 h200 h 280 h 370 h
Fig. 3 – Polarization curves of initial MEA and those
measured in time intervals (respectively, after 100, 200, 280
and 370 h running) under driving cycles.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 62372
3.2. SEM analysis of MEA after operated underdriving cycles
The fuel cell was dissembled to explore the degradation
mechanism by investigating alternations of membrane and
catalyst layer after driving cycles. Fig. 4 was the cross-section
Fig. 4 – Cross-section of MEA morphology and corresponding e
MEAs.
of MEA morphology and corresponding elements distribution,
respectively, for initial MEA and the one after driving cycle
operation. The colors shown in the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images were also clearly presented below. It
was the distribution of some elements composition of MEA.
From the axes of the spectra, it was found that the thickness of
initial MEA was about 70 mm. Anode side was located in the
range of 0–10 mm. In the middle, 10–60 mm, was the distribu-
tion of elements in membrane. Lastly, 60–70 mm was the
element distribution in cathode side. While after 370 h driving
cycles, MEA expanded and the thickness of it increased to
about 82 mm. The change of the thickness of anode was not so
clear and it was in the range of 0–10 mm. But the membrane
became distorted and expanded to about 58 mm (10–68 mm).
The cathode electrode twisted and expanded to about 14 mm
(68–82 mm).
From the spectra of elements’ distribution, it was found
that F element was uniformly dispersed in the membrane and
catalyst layer and Pt catalyst was only dispersed in the anode
and cathode side for the initial MEA. After 370 h driving cycle
operation, a visible degradation of F element band occurred in
the cathode side and in the interface of membrane and cata-
lyst layer. In the membrane, the band of Pt element appeared.
It was obviously that F element was depleted obviously,
especially in the cathode side and the interface of membrane
and catalyst layer. From these results, we thought that the
membrane started degradation at the electrode/membrane
lements distribution of (a) the initial and (b) the degraded
![Page 5: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DegradedMEA
InitialMEA
Fig. 5 – Surface morphologies of the cathode electrode, (a) initial MEA; (b) the one after driving cycle operation.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 6 2373
interface of the anode and cathode and then continued
degradation from interface towards the center of the
membrane. Additionally, the scattering of Pt in the membrane
was maybe due to the dissolution of Pt under driving cycles [8].
Fig. 5 was the surface morphologies of the cathode elec-
trode, respectively, for the initial MEA and the one after
driving cycle operation. From Fig. 5, it can be seen for the
initial MEA, Pt/C catalysts were uniformly dispersed. While
after 370 h driving cycles, part of catalysts particles grew up
and some aggregated. Cracks appeared in most regions of the
catalyst layer after driving cycles. Corresponding EDS
mapping of Fig. 5 was presented in Fig. 6. It was found that Pt,
F and S elements were sparsely dispersed on the surface of
degraded MEA while those elements were thickly and evenly
dispersed on the surface of the initial one.
Considering the results of fuel cell performance under
driving cycles and defection of MEA structure, it was assumed
that a uniform dispersion of catalysts were beneficial to the
Fig. 6 – Corresponding ED
fuel cell performance, while degradation of membrane,
dissolution of catalyst, expanding of catalyst layer and cracks
and gaps in the catalyst layer were main reasons for fuel cell
performance degradation [8,15,16]. The degradation of MEA
after dynamic driving cycles was maybe due to the constant
switch on and off and overloading during dynamic change of
load.
3.3. Degradation of Pt/C catalysts after operateddriving cycles
As the catalyst layer is the most important region for electro-
chemical reaction, the change of catalyst morphology could
give evidence for the change of electro-chemical properties.
Fig. 7 was the TEM images of the initial and degraded catalyst.
For the initial MEA, Pt particles were uniformly dispersed on
the carbon support. After 370 h driving cycles, catalysts either
from anode or cathode electrodes obviously grew up. It was
S mapping of Fig. 4.
![Page 6: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Fig. 7 – TEM micrographs of catalyst, (a) initial one, (b) the degraded catalyst from anode side, (c) degraded catalyst from
cathode side.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 62374
clearly seen that driving cycles affect catalyst layers, no
matter if anode or cathode, dramatically. As fuel cell operated
in 100% humidification condition, therefore, the growth
mechanism of Pt was maybe due to the Pt mobility (dissolu-
tion or re-precipitation) enhanced by water [8].
3.4. Cyclic voltammetry results after operation of manycycles/hours
Fig. 8 was cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the initial and
those measured in time intervals after many driving cycles. It
was found that the area of desorbed hydrogen (marked by
square, at about 0.09–0.366 V, versus RHE) decreased in
a moderate rate during 280 h driving cycles operation and
then followed by a much rapid degradation rate. As the area of
desorbed hydrogen is corresponding to the active catalyst
surface area, it means that loss of electro-catalyst surface
predominately happened with driving cycles, especially after
280 h of operation. Considering SEM and TEM results, it was
concluded that loss of electro-catalysts surface was due to the
dissolution and aggregation of Pt particles, which was caused
by the strong load on and off or even overload under dynamic
driving cycles.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
I / m
A
Ewe / V
Prior to driving cycle100h200h280h370h
Fig. 8 – Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the initial and
those measured in time intervals after many driving
cycles.
Furthermore, from degradation of fuel cell performance
and CV results, a strongly increased degradation rate
occurred, which was corresponding to the rate of active
electro-catalyst surface area loss. It was assumed that after
280 h of driving cycle operation the electro-chemical proper-
ties of MEA was defected seriously compared with the period
of 0–280 h operation.
As show in Fig. 8, it was further found that potentials of
oxygen reduction, at about 0.8 V, RHE, marked by the line,
were moving to lower values with increasing driving cycles,
while potentials of hydrogen reduction almost was main-
tained constant. The movement of the former one also sug-
gested the oxygen reduction activity of MEA will have
a considerable decrease with driving cycle running [17].
3.5. Impedances results under dynamic driving cycles
Electro-chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been
demonstrated to be a powerful technique to study the
fundamental processes in fuel cells [18]. The components of
MEA had been analyzed by EIS to further investigate the
mechanism for the rapid decay of fuel cell performance.
Impedance of the fuel cell operated under dynamic driving
cycle at 0, 100, 280 and 370 h operation was recorded in Fig. 9.
0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
0.00
0.01
0.02
-Im
(Z
) / O
hm
Re(Z) / Ohm
Prior to driving cycle100h280h370h
Fig. 9 – Impedance of the fuel cell operated under dynamic
driving cycles.
![Page 7: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 6 2375
At the beginning of the experiment, one recognized
a depressed semicircle from EIS plots. With increasing driving
cycles, the real as well as the imaginary parts of the imped-
ance plots increased at the same time. In addition, the inter-
cept of real part of impedance plots moved to high values with
driving cycles going on. Especially, after exceeding 280 h, the
intercept of real part after 370 h running greatly increased and
the diameter of the loop increased to double size. The differ-
ence for EIS plots between 280 h and 370 h operation was
much more distinctive than other points.
The intercept of impedance plots in high frequency was
generally taken as the resistance of the membrane. As the
fuel cell was in 100% humidity, the movement of intercept
in high frequency to positive direction wais mainly due to
the membrane degradation, which may make the conduc-
tivity of membrane decrease and was one of the crucial
issues for the degradation of fuel cell performance [19–22].
Diameter of Nyquist plot was mainly determined by the
charge transfer resistance of the interfacial oxygen reduc-
tion process. The diameter of the loops increased and
moved to positive direction reflecting an increased charge
transfer resistance within the catalyst layer with increasing
driving cycles.
Combined with results of SEM, degradation of fuel cell
performance and EIS plots, it was concluded that the defected
structure of the MEA (degradation of membrane and catalyst
layer) made resistance of fuel cell to greatly increase and
induced corresponding fuel cell performance degradation.
Distinctive difference could be found either for the EIS plots or
fuel cell performance after 280 h driving cycle operation.
Seriously increased charge resistance and membrane resis-
tance after 280 h operation was one of the reasons for the
abruptly degraded performance.
4. Conclusions
Dynamic driving cycles were designed to modulate the real
vehicle running as accelerated testing. The performance of
the fuel cell during driving cycles was represented by time-
dependent load profiles. A moderate degradation rate of the
voltage could be detected for about 280 h of operation which
was then followed by a much more rapid decrease of perfor-
mance. The decline in voltage over time suggested the
degradation of fuel cell performance.
Structural and electro-chemical changes within catalyst
layer and membrane were investigated to find the significant
failure for the cause of performance degradation. With driving
cycles running, the resistance of the membrane and charge
transfer increased. One of reasons was due to the degradation
of membrane, which affected the proton conductance and
resulted in corresponding fuel cell performance degradation.
Another reason was that part of the membrane and catalyst
departed away and the formation of cracks in catalyst layer
increased the charge transfer resistances of the electrodes.
Also the growth and aggregation of catalyst particles in the
catalyst layer resulted in a decreased active surface area for
chemical reaction.
It was clear that 280 h of driving cycles was a key point for
this experiment. At that point, performance of the fuel cell
was greatly decreased and corresponding electro-chemical
properties did also happen.
Our study will give valuable information for the application
of fuel cells in the area of transportation. In the next step, we
will detect the effect of different dynamic driving cycles on the
performance of the fuel cell and try to find the correlation
between them and give information to forecast the life of
a fuel cell.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural
Science Foundation (No.20703031), Young Teacher Research
Fund of the Doctoral Program of Higher Education
(No.1700279016) and Program for Young Excellent Talents in
Tongji University (No. 2006KJ022) for supporting this project.
Authors greatly thank Ms. Reibner Regine (DLR, Germany) for
the serious revision and kind references supply and Ms. Aip-
ing Jia for performing SEM measurements.
r e f e r e n c e s
[1] Wahdame B, Candusso D, Francois X, Harel F, Pera M,Hissel D, et al. Comparison between two PEM fuel celldurability tests performed at constant current and undersolicitations linked to transport mission profile. Int JHydrogen Energy 2007;32:4523–36.
[2] Schulze M, Knori T, Schneider A, Gulzow E. Degradation ofsealing for PEFC test cells during fuel cell operation. J PowerSources 2004;127:222–9.
[3] Ahn SY, Shin SJ, Ha HY, Hong SA, Lee YC, Lim TW, et al.Performance and lifetime analysis of the kW-class PEMFCstack. J Power Sources 2002;106:295–303.
[4] Knights SD, Colbow KM, Pierre JS, Wilkinson DP. Agingmechanism and lifetime of PEFC and DMFC. J Power Sources2004;127:127–34.
[5] Liu D, Case S. Durability study of proton exchangemembrane fuel cells under dynamic testing conditions withcyclic current profile. J Power Sources 2005;161:521–31.
[6] Yan XQ, Hou M, Sun LY, Cheng HB, Hong YL, Liang D, et al.The study on transient characteristic of proton exchangemembrane fuel cell stack during dynamic loading. J PowerSources 2007;163:966–70.
[7] Borup RL, Davey JR, Garzon FH, Wood DL, Inbody MA. PEMfuel cell electrocatalyst durability measurement. J PowerSources 2006;163:76–81.
[8] The knowledge foundation’s – 3rd annual internationalconference, fuel cell durability and performance. Miami: Theknowledge Press; 2007.
[9] Bonnet C, Didierjean S, Guillet N, Besse S, Colinart T, Carre P.Design of an 80 kWe PEM fuel cell system: scale up effectinvestigation. J Power Sources 2008;182:441–8.
[10] Schulze M, Gulzow E, Schonbauer ST, Knori T, Reissner R.Segmented cells as tool for development of fuel cells anderror prevention/prediagnostic in fuel cell stacks. J PowerSources 2007;173:19–27.
[11] Yuan XZ, Sun JC, Blanco M, Wang HJ, Zhang JJ, Wilkinson DP.AC impedance diagnosis of 500W PEM fuel cell stack Pat1:stack impedance. J Power Sources 2006;161:920–8.
[12] Pei PC, Chang QF, Tang T. A quick evaluating method forautomotive fuel cell lifetime. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:3829–36.
![Page 8: Investigation of dynamic driving cycle effect on performance degradation and micro-structure change of PEM fuel cell](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022080309/57501ddc1a28ab877e8db718/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 4 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 2 3 6 9 – 2 3 7 62376
[13] Harel F, Francois X, Candusso D, Pera MC, Hissle D,Kauffmann JM. PEMFC durability test under specific dynamiccurrent solicitation, linked to a vehicle road cycle. Fuel Cells2007;7:142–52.
[14] Escribano S, Morin A, Solan S, Sommacal B, Capron P,Rougeaux I, et al. 3rd European PEFC Forum. Lucerne: 2005.
[15] Schulze M, Wager N, Kaz T, Friedrich KA. Combinedelectrochemical and surface analysis investigation ofdegradation processes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuelcells. Electrochim Acta 2007;52:2328–36.
[16] Tang HL, Wang SL, Jiang SP, Pan M. A comparative study ofCCM and hot-pressed MEAs for PEM fuel cells. J PowerSources 2007;170:140–4.
[17] Luo Z, Li D, Tang H, Pan M, Ruan R. Degradation behavior ofmembrane-electrode-assembly materials in 10-cell PEMFCstack. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:1831–7.
[18] Barsoukov E, Macdonald JR. Impedance spectroscopy: theory,experiment and applications. 2nd version. John Wiley &Sons; 2005. p. 497–528.
[19] Romero-Castanon T, Arriaga LG, Cano-Castillo U. Impedancespectroscopy as a tool in the evaluation of MEA’s. J PowerSources 2003;118:179–82.
[20] Liu FQ, Yi BL, Xing DM, Yu JR, Hou ZJ, Fu YZ. Development ofnovel self-humidifying composite membranes for fuel cells. JPower Sources 2003;124:81–9.
[21] Wagner N, Schulze M. Change of electrochemicalimpedance spectra during CO poisoning of the Pt and Pt–Ruanodes in a membrane fuel cell (PEFC). Electrochim Acta2003;48:3899–907.
[22] Fischer A, Jindra J, Wendt H. Porosity and catalyst utilizationof thin layer cathodes in air operated PEM-fuel cells. J ApplElectrochem 1998;28:277–82.